Theo James: The Gentlemen/Meghan Markle casting rumors were ‘a lot of hot air’

Two weekends ago, the British media could speak of little else other than “the Duchess of Sussex is getting a role in The Gentlemen Season 3!” Even a cursory examination of this rumor revealed a convoluted game of telephone and a heavy streak of anti-Sussex bias. Basically, all anyone could really prove is that The Gentlemen Season 2 comes out in early September and Guy Ritchie will soon begin writing the third season, which may or may not include a role for Meghan. That’s it. There’s no offer, no contract, no nailed-down role, no script.

One outlet accused the all-powerful Meghan for pushing these rumors as a “cynical” tactic to get some acting jobs. I pointed out that it was far more likely a cynical ploy from the other direction – that The Gentlemen’s producers and Netflix were using Meghan’s name to promote the second season. I even wrote: “Now Theo James and the rest of the cast will field questions about Meghan’s possible involvement during their press junket, and every time they say anything about Meghan, it will make international headlines (especially if they say something snide).” I hate that I was right, btw. But I called it.

Netflix’s buzzy show about a drug-dealing Duke, The Gentlemen, returns tomorrow, and star Theo James is over all the rumors swirling about Meghan Markle joining season three. When T&C asked James, who plays Eddie, the 13th Duke of Halstead, in the series, about the possibility of a certain ex-royal being on the show, he replied with a smile, “Yes, Fergie is joining. She’ll be playing my love interest.”

He continued, “No, I think that was mainly a lot of hot air,” referring to the ongoing coverage of the Duchess of Sussex’s potential role in the series. “At the moment, we’re just trying to get as many eyes on season two, and then season three will happen soon. But in terms of story, we have the overarching ambition of where we’re going to go. We’re going to expand the world, go to different countries. But in terms of the minutiae, I mean, it’s still very much up in the air.”

[From Town & Country]

Think of how easily he could have said something like “I have no idea, I don’t think the next season has been written yet, so you’ll have to talk to Guy.” Low drama, no soundbyte, nothing snide. Instead, it’s as I predicted – they used Meghan’s name to hype the show ahead of the premiere, knowing that the cast would be asked about her during their junket. And would you look at that, more headlines than this show has ever gotten before. Theo was asked about Meghan’s potential casting during another junket interview, and he also “joked” that Prince Harry would play his love interest too. This whole stupid story is going to keep going for months – I guarantee that the Daily Mail will use “a lot of hot air” repeatedly. This was always the play.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

30 Responses to “Theo James: The Gentlemen/Meghan Markle casting rumors were ‘a lot of hot air’”

  1. Mightymolly says:

    TBF I hadn’t heard of the Gentleman and now I have, so the ploy worked. But any excuse for photos of Theo James is okay by me. (Who got The Time Traveler’s Wife cancelled? Just point me in their direction and I’ll take care of the rest.).

    • ELX says:

      Something new to discuss: how much did Guy Ritchie pay Tina Brown to start that rumor? What’s Tina’s going rate for spots in her Substack screeds, etc.? Is Tina on Guy’s PR payroll or is it all under the table?

  2. MidnightSuperNova says:

    All this chatter as Meghan and As ever are selling out almost every product they drop on their site.

  3. Barbara says:

    Hot guys really need to stop defiling their faces with the pornstache. 😭

  4. Elle says:

    I’m sorry, but this is not going to end well. They were safe in CA, now they are red meat for the British press, who btw is fresh off the kill of Jason Arday. Harry has put his family in danger for what, exactly? This was a bad decision on his part. It’s one thing to be stupid about his own safety, but now he’s putting his wife and kids in danger. I confess to having a very low opinion of Harry right now.

    • Talia says:

      I wonder if part of the reason is financial. I’ve heard 5 million per year quoted for their security and that can only climb as Archie and Lili get older and more independent.

      Bearing in mind it is only that much because Harry is the son of the King, it must leave a bitter taste for them to realise they have to spend literally hundreds of millions (over 30 or 40 years) on something they should be getting as of right.

      I know they are doing well but I suspect not to the extent that multiple millions a year can just be dismissed

      • Lurker says:

        The 5 million was a guesstimate of security costs in England. Made to get the public behind the “hell no we won’t pay for him” cart.

        Harry and Meghan very likely pay about 1 million a year. The costs won’t rise significantly while the children are kept out of the public and visit private day schools.

        They can afford it. What would me personally bug more is the 2.4 million they paid for the renovation of Frogmore. The Crown Estate should reimburse the costs.

    • Blujfly says:

      The only thing Meghan had to do to prevent all of this was stay at Holme in California. Why is this decision solely on Harry? Does she have no agency? Their children are American citizens and lived in California their entire life (Lili) and most of their life (Archie). She literally just had to stay put if she didn’t want to move back.

  5. Lili says:

    I really enjoyed the film the Gentlemen i have a soft spot for Hugh grant, i was surpised to see how much he had grown as an actor so i was looking forward to watching the Gentlemen, i barely made it through the first episode when it can out, so i dove back in when all the rumors started trying to figure out how Meghan would fit in and i still cant get past episode 3 maybe i’ll have a binge watch one of these days

    • Smart&Messy says:

      I’m not ashamed to admit I felt the opposite way. I fell asleep on the movie (I rarely enjoy GR movies) and loved the series.

      • Jferber says:

        HILLARYISALWAYSRIGHT, I totally agree about Hillary and love that you chose that name for yourself for Celebitchy. Can you explain the Britishism, “take the piss?” I’ve never heard it before. Thanks. And Hillary will always be right!!!

  6. Amy Bee says:

    Guy Ritchie better pay Meghan for all this free publicity his show is getting.

  7. SarahCS says:

    I mean he was honest – “At the moment, we’re just trying to get as many eyes on season two”

  8. Puff Updater says:

    I still have my fingers crossed. 🤞🏻 I want to see Meghan play a bad-ass butt-kicker. Guy Ritchie could write the perfect villainess role for her. She herself has been kicked around way too much, time to take back the night, at least on screen.

  9. Sparkling Water says:

    I still think the entire rumor was started by either Netflix or WME, or maybe both. Both of them are clearly benefiting.

  10. HillaryIsAlwaysRight says:

    I just love it that Theo James loves to take the piss in these interviews, as the Brits say. He’s my choice for Bond, whether he wants it or not. *Sigh*

  11. Sonya says:

    Ritchie or Netflix didn’t start the rumor. It was that hag from the Telegraph and Tina Brown. To continue the narrative that Meghan is a failure. Alot of Meghan’s fan bought & continued to pinned their hopes that Meghan would return to acting. She had six years in California to do so. She only did a small cameo. Meghan is in her entrepreneurial phase of life.

  12. tamsin says:

    I started watching the Netflix series and couldn’t get through the first episode. It just could not hold my interest, and this was when it debuted. And it seems we are at the point where anyone can make up anything about Meghan and Harry and float it until damage is done or it’s debunked.

  13. paintybox says:

    I started watching the show but now I’m going to boycott it, thanks. They’ll need to play nicer about Meghan since they’re using her name and spreading false rumors about her for free hype and publicity for a mediocre series.

  14. Gravitas says:

    She’s a fantastic entrepreneur. She’s a so-so actor in the dreaded almost-50 zone.

  15. Jferber says:

    I hate the mustache, but no one can say Theo isn’t a good-looking bloke. For me, he looks so damned entitled, like he’s had everything handed to him on a gold plate.

  16. Scamuppet says:

    Theo James speaks for the producers? We do know that he can’t land a joke, tho

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment