Glee creator calls for boycott of Newsweek following homophobic article

Fox's Glee Spring Premiere Soiree - Inside
The creator of Glee, Ryan Murphy, sent an open letter to EW calling for a boycott of Newsweek in light of an ignorant, homophobic article by an author named Ramin Setoodeh in which he essentially argued that openly gay men can’t convincingly play straight characters. Setoodeh, a gay man, has since issued a follow-up defending himself and claiming he’d been attacked and his words taken out of context. (Here’s a good rebuttal by Qweerty showing that no, his words weren’t taken out of context.)

Seedotah called out two openly gay actors as too “queeny” to play straight men in his original essay: Sean Hayes, of Promises Promises, (formerly on Will and Grace) and Jonathan Groff, who plays Jessie St. James, the love interest of Lea Michelle (Rachel) on Glee. In response, Hayes’ Promises co-star, Kristin Chenoweth, (who has also worked with Groff on Glee) issued an open letter criticizing the article. My favorite line is this one “This article offends me because I am a human being, a woman and a Christian. For example, there was a time when Jewish actors had to change their names because anti-Semites thought no Jew could convincingly play Gentile.” Chenoweth also said that openly gay actors are needed examples for “young people struggling with their sexuality” and that “no one needs to see a bigoted, factually inaccurate article that tells people who deviate from heterosexual norms that they can’t be open about who they are and still achieve their dreams.” Chenoweth encouraged Newsweek to “promote acceptance, love, unity and singing and dancing for all!

The creator of Glee has gone a step further and writes that we should all stop reading Newsweek until they follow Chenoweth’s advice. Here’s his open letter:

I would like to join my good friend Kristin Chenoweth on her condemnation of a recent Newsweek article written by Mr. Ramin Setoodeh, in which Setoodeh basically says that out gay actors should go back into the closet and never attempt to play straight characters. This article is as misguided as it is shocking and hurtful. It shocks me because Mr. Setoodeh is himself gay. But what is the most shocking of all is that Newsweek went ahead and published such a blatantly homophobic article in the first place…and has remained silent in the face of ongoing (and justified) criticism. Would the magazine have published an article where the author makes a thesis statement that minority actors should only be allowed and encouraged to play domestics? I think not.

Today, I have asked GLAAD president Jarrett Barrios to stand with me and others and ask for an immediate boycott of Newsweek magazine until an apology is issued to Sean Hayes and other brave out actors who were cruelly singled out in this damaging, needlessly cruel, and mind-blowingly bigoted piece. An apology should also be issued to all gay readers of the magazine…steelworkers, parents, accountants, doctors, etc…proud hardworking Americans who, if this article is to be believed, should only identify themselves as “queeny” people (a word used by Setoodeh in the article) who stand at the back of the bus and embrace an outdated decades old stereotype.

Mr. Setoodeh has recently Twittered that he is a fan of Glee, the show I co-created with Ian Brennan and Brad Falchuk…the show on which Mr. Groff plays the straight love interest to Lea Michele, a casting choice embraced by fans and critics alike which Mr. Setoodeh has taken issue with.

I extend an open invitation to Mr. Setoodeh to come to the writers room of our show, and perhaps pay a set visit. Hopefully then he can see how we take care to do a show about inclusiveness…a show that encourages all viewers no matter what their sexual orientation to go after their hopes and dreams and not be pigeonholed by dated and harmful rhetoric…rhetoric he sadly spews and believes in. Hopefully, some of the love we attempt to spread will rub off on Mr. Setoodeh — a gay man deeply in need of some education — and he not only apologizes to those he has deeply offended but pauses before he picks up his poison pen again to work through the issues of his own self loathing. Give me a call, Ramin…I’d love to hear from you. I’ll even give you a free copy of our Madonna CD, on which we cover “Open Your Heart,” a song you should play in your house and car on repeat.

Ryan

[From EW.com]

I love how Murphy invited Setoodeh on set and told him to listen to their cover of Madonna’s “Open Your Heart”! Sometimes people can be fooled by ignorant, outdated ideas couched in smart-sounding rhetoric. This article was like a steaming pile of homophobic sh*t set beside a blanket. It still stunk and had nothing to offer but it tried to convince you to sit down and agree with its mean points for a while. No matter what you add to it, it’s still sh*t. Shame on Newsweek for not smelling or noticing it.

67th Annual Golden Globe Awards - Press Room

FOX 2010 Golden Globes Party - Arrivals

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

40 Responses to “Glee creator calls for boycott of Newsweek following homophobic article”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. canadianchick says:

    The article sounds like bunk. Interesting they haven’t apologized yet.

  2. CandyKay says:

    One thing that hasn’t been remarked upon in discussion of this article is that Newsweek itself is in very, very bad shape.

    The same week that the article appeared, Newsweek was put up for sale by its longtime owner, The Washington Post company, which apparently does not foresee a profitable future for the magazine.

    I would guess that Newsweek’s editors may have had a lot of other things on their minds at the time this article appeared.

  3. Morning Glory says:

    Maybe I’m just not seeing it,(maybe I’m just in a prolonged bad mood) but how was that article homophobic? It was bunk yeah, but it was a writer stating his opinion, which is what he is payed to do. He can be wrong without being prejudiced. Controversy ensued and he backtracked, no surprise there.

  4. Taya says:

    I think the author is not being homophobic, just pointing out that most people (Middle American bible humpers)are not going to believe and want to watch, an openly gay male play a straight man.

  5. Snarf says:

    The guy who wrote the article is gay himself. Proof, if ever any was needed, that the one that screams “faggot” the loudest usually is.

  6. MARKY MARK says:

    Newsweek has been one of my favorite mags & I can’t boycott it because of a self-loathing queen. They should have checked this quickly when it came out.
    I’d like to add that in the last few years self-loathing (also a bit jealous, me-thinks) gay men have been popping up a lot in the media lately..Funny how they seem to be hiding behind this sheathe of conservatism

  7. Roma says:

    I agree CandyKay. Editor Jon Meacham made some interesting points on the Daily Show last week, but it was impossible not to believe that Newsweek had died.

    I think the archaic viewpoint of the author is what made this homophobic. Kristin Chenoweth made the rebuttal better than I ever could but if we can watch actresses convincingly play men, I think middle America can handle a “queen” playing it straight.

    Barney Stinson for life!

  8. Me says:

    Taya, since when are most people Middle American Bible humpers???

  9. embertine says:

    taya, I read it the same way. He wasn’t saying it was the way it should be, just that it’s the way it is.

    And given that most of the people I know can’t mention Cynthia Nixon, Ellen de Generes, Sean Hayes etc. without focusing on the fact that they are gay, I can’t disagree with him.

  10. Benjamin says:

    I find it sad that Setoodeh ended up responding on Newsweek’s website that his argument was really meant to inquire as to why we’ve yet to have a bigger star come out of the closet. He was trying to open up a discussion about Hollywood’s glass closet, which is an important discussion to have, but he tried to open up that conversation using the backwards, homophobic reasoning that America’s not ready for a major star to in any way appear less than 100% straight-guy masculine. I think there’s still sadly some truth to that thought, but it’s such a shame that Setoodeh chose to reinforce those backwards, bigoted politics instead of working to dismantle them.

  11. kai says:

    Morning Glory-

    Having an opinion that isn’t the PC opinion of the hivemind makes you a racist/homophobe/bigot/Christian, didn’t you know that? I find it hilarious that those who scream the loudest for “tolerance” cannot be tolerant of different opinions. Just because your opinion isn’t the officially sanctioned one does not make you a homophobe, but it’s WAY more fun to shriek, get “SOOO OUTRAGED” and point fingers and name-call than be reasonable.

    Also, an added bonus is that if you name-call first, YOU get to be the enlightened, tolerant one instead of the one being crucified…and we all know that those who are always seeing racism/homophobia/etc where there is none are the REAL bigots. They just use the classic method of deflection, blaming others for their own hang-ups, because they’re secretly terrified of being exposed as the bigots they are. It would be funny really if it wasn’t so pathetic, and if it wasn’t indicative of how far we’ve fallen as a country when opinions that aren’t “acceptable” are not being argued against reasonably, with facts and logic but with shrill rhetoric, name-calling and hysteria from the PC douchebag brigade. And you’re ALL part of the problem, just FYI.

    I hope this guy DOESN’T apologize and tells everyone to go f*ck themselves, because this shit has got to stop. His opinion is not hurting anyone, it is not homophobic or hurtful, it is just an OPINION and he is entitled to it. It’s called free speech and just remember, it’s a slippery slope when we start trying to muzzle other, dissenting opinions (which is what is going on here, whether or not anyone will admit it).

  12. Morning Glory says:

    Yeah, thanks Taya, for enforcing that stereotype. Get offended at one, and use the one that suits your purpose. Like there aren’t anti-gay people everywhere.

  13. John Doe says:

    This whole hangup you Americans have with homosexuality is really getting stupid.

    Really who cares if someone is gay? What difference does it make to anyone?

    Really, the USA has some real social and economic issues right now and people still get hung up on whether someone is gay or straight.

    Hey America, you are over 200 years old!
    Grow up!

  14. Kate says:

    Did anyone ever think that maybe this is exactly what Newsweek wanted? Seriously, when was the last time anyone talked about Newsweek? Desperate times call for desperate measures. It’s just like the creepy Nike commercial with Tiger Woods and his dead father. Sure it was in horrible taste and Tiger is an idiot for doing it, but the people running Nike are geniuses. Everyone was talking about “nike” just like everyone is talking about “newsweek.”

  15. Bam Bam says:

    Many a gay guy has fooled me and everyone so its simply not true. But curiously as I watch Doogie Howser play a hetero player, he’s funny, but I don’t really buy the character so much.

  16. stinabelle says:

    I don’t know about homophobic, but I found the article to be very judgmental and rigid. Sure, everyone can have an opinion, but if you voice it, you have to be prepared for others to be offended or not agree. Freedom of speech goes both ways. Debate is not a bad thing.

    I don’t agree with what the writer said about gay actors. They’re actors. They are paid to be people they aren’t. If straight actors can play gay men and women, then gay actors can play straight men. I don’t really get the disconnect here.

  17. Huma says:

    To a poster above, since when are Middle American bible thumpers “most people?”

    That being said, yes, the article and ignorant and shameful. It’s about typecasting, which is fine to a certain extent (Angelina Jolie always getting gun-toting bad girl parts – well, usually; and Ashton Kutcher being the doofy frat boy with a heart of gold; and so on) but when typecasting eclipses that function and becomes about who is qualified to play what (African Americans only qualified to play domestic parts, in honor of the late Lena Horn and her legacy; or saying that Middle-Eastern-actors are only qualified to play terrorists; so on) it’s ignorant, narrow-minded, and damaging.

    He claims he only wanted to discuss whether or not we’d ‘buy it’ if George Clooney (or someone like him) came out of the closet or whatever, but that was only mentioned in the last part of the article, after he’d bashed those actors for a good length of time/paper.

    I’ve never seen Sean Hayes in anything other than a couple episodes of W&G. But I’ve seen Jon Groff on Broadway and in Glee, and the boy is fantastic. I wanted to jump his bones even though I knew full well he played for the other team. These are actors playing parts. That’s it.

    And I loved reading Chenoweth, Michael Urie (sp?) and the dude who plays the Canadian actor/singer in 30 Rock (Cheyenne something?)’s responses to this. The two boys were tweeting about it yesterday, joking about how they’d never nab a Newsweek cover now.

    Maybe when Newsweek changes hands, they’ll have a chance. 😛

  18. kai says:

    John Doe-

    Not as stupid as holier-than-thou, preachy Europeans (I’m guessing you’re European, what with that attitude and all) telling us what’s wrong with a country that they likely know nothing about. At least here we have free speech, unlike the EU…maybe you should be fixing your own country’s issues instead of lecturing us…but then you wouldn’t get to feel smug and superior, now would you?

  19. Huma says:

    Also, regarding Corey Monteith, just call me a carpenter because I WOULD NAIL THAT TO THE WALL.

    Like almost every other girl here. 😛 Gosh, I’m just SO unique, you guys.

  20. Iggles says:

    Honestly, probably the only way for the middle america crowd to wake up is for a slew of closeted actors to come out (Jakey, I’m looking at you!). Once they see so many male leads are gay it would put the myth that gay men can’t pull of straight roles to bed.

  21. EMV says:

    @Kai- Thank you!

  22. Carl says:

    @kai

    Yes, because everyone who critcizes the US of A must be european.

    Maybe you should go educate yourself on the fact that the countries in the european union all do have free speech, you’d look less like a moron then.
    But I guess being moronic is just an integral part of you, what with the attitude and all…

  23. QueenofSheba says:

    Considering I had no idea that Jonathan Groff was gay (and never really thought about it while watching him on Glee)the author’s theory makes no sense. Now that I know he is, my opinion of his performance in the role has not changed-so there!

  24. mig says:

    So the gay author is homophobic?? That’s a silly conclusion to draw. Can’t he just see things differently than you do? Just because he thinks gay actors aren’t convincing as straight characters doesn’t mean he’s scared of homosexuals 😛 What happened to tolerance? Oh yeah, you only have to be tolerant if you’re not gay. Gays can be as rude and ignorant as they want, right? And they can feel justified in doing so….somehow…. Everyone else needs to censor their opinions and feelings, though, or they’re homophobic. Please. We’re not scared of you. We’re not even all that interested. We simply disagree on various things, but guess what! We disagree with heterosexuals too! Guess we’re just scared of everyone 😛

  25. Lucinda says:

    Groff is gay???? Had no clue.

  26. Bee says:

    Homosexual male actors who’ve played heterosexuals

    1.Rock Hudson
    2.Laurence Olivier
    3.Raymond Burr
    4.Richard Chamberline
    5.Montgomery Clift
    6.James Dean ?
    7.Tab Hunter
    8.Neil Patrick Harris
    9.Matt Bomer
    10.T.R. Knight
    11.Jonathan Groff
    12.Rupert Everett
    13.Chad Allen
    14.John Barrowmen

    The list goes on and on. And before people say that the public was not aware that many of the actors mentioned above were gay, there were rumors about most of those actors even in their time. It doesn’t matter if an actors gay, straight, married, a furry, or whatever. It’s all make believe anyway.

  27. Taya says:

    @ embertine..Morning Glory..

    I have lived in 40 states and two countries I have met more people that are anti-gay bible thumpers then ones that are not. Once you get out of your little box and experience this country and beyond and see the real beliefs of people, then you can give a response.

  28. sassenach says:

    I would have never thought Jonathan Groff is gay! He is fantastic! Just to play devils advocate, maybe it depends on how good the actor is. I was shocked to see how believable Heath and Jake were in Brokeback Mountain. I also think Tom Cruise who is always rumored to be gay has had fantastic chemistry with all of his costars except Nicole. I can totally buy him a straight when he makes movies. However one of my fav day time actors who is amazing is not at all convincing that he is a straight married lawyer. Same goes for Hugh Jackman, he never comes off as a straight man to me. I think it all comes down to talent.

  29. julie says:

    wow i just dont get it. Its called “acting”. If they are not believable in their roles, they are not good actors. I wish hollywood and the country in general would get over this whole “whos gay, whos in the closet” thing that the gossip sites talk about everyday. Why should anyone care about what someone does behind closed doors. It should be about their performance. What about Will on “Will and Grace”? He was a straight man playing gay. No one brings that up. Do we not have better things to talk about?

  30. ViktoryGin says:

    Okay, I’ve not read the article and don’t plan to as I don’t have the time, but what was his stance exactly? Was he attempting to claim that gay actors aren’t convincing as hetero or was he legitimately advising gays to stay in the closet because of public perception that would influence their effectiveness of screen?

    While I’ll leave it up to gay actors to decide what’s right for them, in the latter case I can understand the writer’s stance as an existential reality due to the public’s tendency to project their attractions onto celebrities and peformers. It seems to that he may have been trying to say something to this effect and it got mired by ineffectual writing. I believe this to be the case, especially if the writer himself is openly gay.

    @Kai

    Yes, people are entitled to their opinions, particularly if they deviate from what is poltically acceptable. With that said, when you belong to a group of people who have in various cultures historically been persecuted and who are just now being allowed political agency in only a view nations, political dissidence no matter how ideologically justified is hurtful and retrogressive for those whose chief social experience is one of marginalization. In the case of Sedoteeh, he should have known better and framed his argument better.

    By the way, just as a matter of fact….most Europeans with whom I’m personally acquainted know more about the American political scene than many Americans, and perhaps this gap wouldn’t exist if Americans took more pride in attempting to educate themselves instead of viewing education as a useless elitist enterprise. Just saying.

  31. stinabelle says:

    @Bee – Barrowman is amazing! He’s such a great actor and a great example.

    And I want to add that I think it’s totally possible for someone who is gay to be homophobic. It’s self-hate, probably drawn from how they’re portrayed and how society tends to respond when someone comes out. If their parents don’t accept them, I can see that happening as well.

  32. Demos says:

    Hey, Carl,

    Suuure, Europe has “free speech,” so long as you’re willing to have universally left-wing opinions and denounce any right-wingers as RacistSexistHomerphobes.

    And by EU standards of politics, The Brit LibDems are fascist Nazis and the American Republicans are bizarre, savage monsters.

    Oh, and as for Newsweek, why don’t we take a look at some of its recent covers?

    http://www.leftcoastrebel.com/2010/05/impending-newsweek-demise.html

    “Is your baby racist?”
    “The decline and fall of Christian America”
    “Obama’s Lincoln”

    If anything, liberals should be lining up to offer Newsweek free blowjobs.

  33. Kim says:

    Name some openly gay actors who played a straight romantic lead role after it was publicly known that they were gay. Neil and TR got those roles before they came out.The real test will be if they came get romantic lead parts after their shows or current roles end. As for there were rumors about the actors mentioned above. I never heard rumors about NPH until Perez outed him.

  34. I should be working says:

    I read his article, don’t find it homophobic at all. And I wouldn’t say he automatically gets a pass because he’s homosexual. He’s asking a question, and then giving his opinion on the matter. The article was basically about Hayes’ performance, which I have not seen to critique myself, but apparently The NYT wasn’t impressed either. (not that they’re the end-all-be-all)

    A pretty good response by Queerty? CB, please stop. The “Gay is the new Black” argument will NEVER work, so anyone still drawing similarties should STFU (I’m getting angry). They were just mad. And why? Because it made for a meaty blog. Hits! More hits! Oooh! It wasn’t any more well-written than Setoodeh’s article.

    As for loving Kristin’s comments: “no one needs to see a bigoted, factually inaccurate article that tells people who deviate from heterosexual norms that they can’t be open about who they are and still achieve their dreams” OMG, SHUUUUUT UUUUP. She’s sticking up for her friend who (apparently) gave a weak performance. What facts were inaccurate? Maybe I’ll have to read it again?

    Nobody’s telling young gay kids they can’t pursue their dreams OR that they’ll never be able to play hetero if they are open about their sexuality or “out”. The question is why doesn’t it happen or will it happen in Hollywood TODAY. Not 50 years ago, when it was taboo (we understand why). But TODAY when it’s so f*n en vogue.

    I’ll have to check out the new kid on Glee.

    @Julie- I agree with your sentiment; I, too, am tired of the “gay/not gay? Ooh!” Like we give a ish or like it really f*n matters. But, um, did you read the article? That was part of his point- straight actors today have played (convincingly) gay. We haven’t seen the revers in today’s Hollywood, and why not? That’s the discussion he was trying to start.

    @Bee- Ummm yeah, can you give me the title where Rupert Everett played straight convincingly? Musta missed that one. Oh yeah, TR too. CONVINCINGLY IS THE KEY WORD HERE.

    Geez, but I need to get a life. Getting all riled up over a BLOG and some miscellaneous, anonymous comments. SMDH. I’m so tired of the gay talk, I mean REALLY. Can’t say anything w/out people jumping on you and twisting it out of proportion.

    And I’m still laughing at the Glee creator’s invitation to dude to come watch “Open Your Heart”. (dude, please shut up)

    TEAM SETOODEH

  35. Nanea says:

    @ Demos, @ Kai:

    Are you always so ignorant about what goes on in other countries? Most of Europe has governments that are right of center on the political spectrum.

    That said, compared to conservatives like Sarko or Dr Merkel, the GOP really comes across as nothing but a bunch of birthers, Tea Baggers and Christian fundamentalists right now.

  36. Bee says:

    @Stinabelle I know Barrowman is fantastic. He’s the only reason I’ve been tuning in to Desperate Housewives lately.

    @I should be working I thought Rupert Everett was very convincing in An Ideal Husband. He just hasn’t been given that many opportunities to play a straight man since he came out. I’ll admit T.R. Knight didn’t have much chemistry with Callie, and none with Izzie on Grey’s. But, in my opinion that was due to his acting ability and not his sexuality.

    @#33 There were rumors about pretty much all those actors. Even in the 1950s when Rock Hudson and others were working there were rag mags that alluded to their sexuality.

  37. KsGirl says:

    “I hope this guy DOESN’T apologize and tells everyone to go f*ck themselves, because this shit has got to stop. His opinion is not hurting anyone, it is not homophobic or hurtful, it is just an OPINION and he is entitled to it.”

    This. God, the pile-on here is gross. And FWIW, I’m a healthcare lovin’ Canadian.

  38. I should be working says:

    @KsGirl- what do you mean?

  39. mags says:

    lol, it’s not like i’m ever gonna sleep with them, what does it matter if they’re gay or straight. just matters that they play the part well.
    this whole thing reeks of Newsweek’s last dying gasp for relevance.
    lol to the idiot who thought America was the only place w/ free speech. man US public education is really dropping the ball these days :/

  40. eternalcanadian says:

    “openly gay men can’t convincingly play straight characters”

    i guess we all forgot about rock hudson and montgomery clift. oh and bisexual cary grant. then again rock and monty they weren’t openly gay for obvious reasons.

    so by saying gay men can’t play straight men means a black women can’t play a role that would be for a white woman. jewish people can’t play non-jewish roles. muslim people can’t play non-muslim roles?

    there’s a reason it is called acting. doesn’t matter what colour or sexuality a person is, if they are good actors they will be convincing enough.