Stylish Celebrity Escapism
Contributing Writers
Apr 22
'08
Paula Abdul wants to be on “Dancing with the Stars”

After botching her recent musical “comeback” Paula Abdul should probably just settle in for as many years as she can on American Idol. Unfortunately no one’s given Paula that message – and the sorta singer/dancer/choreographer has decided what she’d really like to do is join the cast of Dancing with the Stars. Though her recent “Dance Like There’s no Tomorrow” was panned musically, once thing is still true about Paula – the woman can dance.

“I’m just hypothetically thinking about it,” Paula revealed to OK! after sitting in on Monday’s taping of the hit ABC reality competition. And, despite being on a competing network (Idol airs on Fox), she claims there would be no conflict with her show. “There’s a thing called the ‘off-season,’ I think.”

“It’s all Tom’s fault!” she joked, adding, “I’m a huge fan [of DWTS]. It would be a phenomenal experience for me to be a student and to learn a form of dance that I’ve never been introduced to.” But before all the Paula fans go setting their Tivos for next season, she advises, “I’d be honored, but that does not confirm or deny anything that’s out there right now.

And though Paula first gained notoriety for choreographing dance routines for some of the biggest artists in pop, incredibly, she insists that she’s never been a professional dancer. “I was always a choreographer… But I’ve never been able to be a student and I’ve never done partnering. If I even dabbled with it, I had to be the guy and that’s not fun. I want to wear the pretty dresses like the girls.”

[From OK Magazine]

Paula’s never been a dance student, but she was a professional choreographer? That’s like saying you’ve never taken piano lessons, but you’re a piano teacher. What I hope Paula meant to say was that she’s never been a professional dancer… because she’s obviously been a dancer of some sort. But Paula’s always been a little batty, so just because you’d think logically she must have meant something else, doesn’t mean that’s the case.

I think it’d be a little unfair for someone who’s good enough to have been a famous choreographer to be on Dancing with the Stars. A big part of the fun is watching people with no dance training improve over time. I never find it as interesting to watch the celebrities who have some dance background. It’s just not as impressive to me when they learn to master something. If Paula Abdul learned to master the tango, I wouldn’t be as floored as if Oprah learned to tango. Now if she learned to tango with MC Skat Kat, that’d be totally different. Sorry, it’s hard to write a Paula Abdul story and not mention the Kat.

Here’s Paula Abdul at the Kritik Clothing Party on April 10th at Lisa Kline in Beverly Hills. Images thanks to PR Photos.

Written by JayBird

Posted in Photos

Pages: 1 2 3 4

5 Responses to “Paula Abdul wants to be on “Dancing with the Stars””

  1. sorry Paula,

    You are going to have to wait until they air “Dancing with the Senior Citizens”

    - Shakira Mebarak owes me money.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  2. She’s right about her dancing ability. She never was very good outside of robotic cheerleader movements. No grace at all.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  3. People in Hell want ice water, Paula- but they ain’t gonna get it.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  4. she talentless,and a song theif, rips other people real artists off Idol is sham they pick winners in the audition :twisted:

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

Leave a Reply


Comment Policy: Please be courteous as if you are having a conversation in person. No all-caps posts. If you make comments using different nicknames, repeatedly harass others, or spam, you will be banned. If you make an exceptionally rude comment that people complain about, it will be deleted. Do not dominate the threads by making the same point over and over again or you will be banned. We understand and respect that threads can get heated. Threads will occasionally be closed if the conversation gets very nasty. Repeatedly baiting other commenters or giving rude and attacking responses is not allowed. It's a shame we have to mention that because most of you are kind and respectful of other's opinions.

Comments occasionally become moderated due to spammer's keywords and abuse complaints against specific users, but are otherwise not moderated. We are not responsible for comments in any way and while we work hard to moderate hate words and clean them up we do not have the time or inclination to ensure that they're all acceptable to everyone. In other words - do not blame us for stupid or offensive comments. You will find them on almost every open comment site online. Use the "report spam or abuse" link to get us to delete something if it's offensive.

:D :-) :( :o 8O :? 8) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen:

Get an icon next to your name by signing up for a free Gravatar

Recent Comments:
  • kit: As long as we all agree that Syko’s comments are no more than a form of light entertainment, then I guess...
  • kit: The sisters might want to have a chat with their agent because someone most likely gave the RNC permission to...
  • Trashaddict: First posting was the best: MAY have brain damage??!! ROTFL
  • brista: I, uh…I thought they already HAD their own Disney TV show and that was why we knew of them in the first...
  • Diva: Ethan, read the ARTICLE… Obama hasn’t been on her show since ‘06. And he was on once before...
  • Ethan: Neelyo, I didn’t tell O or anyone how to vote. I was referring to her odd decision (given her being a...
  • Diva: Actually… she lobbied for it, GOT it, said she didn’t want it, but never gave the money back…...
  • Trashaddict: Colic is so miserable. So no matter how privileged, I do feel for her. But with all that help around,...
 
 

Celebitchy is a celebrity gossip site written by several independent authors. The opinions of the authors are their own and do not necessarily represent the opinions of the site owner. All information on this site is for entertainment purposes only. Articles are based on rumor, conjecture, and published information in other sources. The site makes no claims that content is valid, accurate, or true. The site owner and the authors contributing to it will not be held liable for damages resulting from errors, omissions or falsehoods published on this site. It is not the site owner or the contributing authors' intention to defame or malign any particular group, religion, ethnic group, club, organization, company, or individual. The site owner is not responsible for content on linked or quoted sources. All comments made by visitors to the blog are the responsibility of their respective authors and are only sporadically monitored. The site owner will not be held liable for comments in any way.