Vivienne Westwood says the fashion in the SATC movie sucked (mild spoilers)


Fashion designer Vivienne Westwood’s wedding gown featured prominently in the Sex and The City Movie. Carrie was gifted the gown by the designer after she wore it for a Vogue fashion shoot. Costume Designer Patricia Field said she chose to feature Westwood’s gown because she found her designs interesting. Both Field and Westwood are older women known for their eccentric sense of personal style and for their bright red dyed hair, but they may balk at people comparing them. From 67 year-old Westwood’s latest remarks, it sounds like there’s some kind of feud brewing between them.

Westwood said that she absolutely hated the fashion in the Sex and The City Movie, which was all hand picked by Field, and that she couldn’t sit through more than ten minutes of it:

Westwood insists she was far from impressed with stylist Patricia Field’s work on the big screen adaptation of the hit TV series.

She says, “I thought Sex And The City was supposed to be about cutting-edge fashion and there was nothing remotely memorable or interesting about what I saw.

“I went to the premiere and left after ten minutes.”

[From WENN via NY Mag]

This isn’t the first critique I’ve read of the fashion in the film. Slate has a good editorial by Julia Turner about how Carrie was too much of a label whore. Turner said it was a departure from the television series, which often mixed in vintage and cheaper pieces with the high end fashion and wasn’t so concerned about designer names.

Although this labelmania is hardly surprising—why shouldn’t a series known for its fantastical clothing recruit and then flatter such heavy hitters?—I found it disappointing. This is not to say the clothes in the film are bad. Many of the outfits are glorious. (I’ll take two of the Miranda-in-therapy suits and one Carrie-buys-a-copy-of-Vogue fedora.) But there are fewer vintage pieces, fewer off-kilter touches, and the movie, with its emphasis on big-name designers, seems to ignore what the show got right about clothes: that dressing up is a way to invent different versions of yourself.

[From Slate.com]

If you saw the film, do you remember the scene when Carrie was modeling the gowns in which she breathlessly named off the designers one by one as if they were Gods to be revered? It was too much, and my husband and I rolled our eyes at each other. Maybe Westwood got annoyed at Field for thinking she was doing her a favor, or maybe she saw early on that the fashion was label-heavy and resented being lumped in with the other designers in the film. It doesn’t matter, though. One salty old fashion queen’s too-late diss will hardly dent the love for this film and for the fashion in it.

Here’s another photo of Vivienne Westwood at “the Raisa Gorbachev Foundation Gala Dinner at Hampton Court Palace in London” on 6/7/08, thanks to WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

35 Responses to “Vivienne Westwood says the fashion in the SATC movie sucked (mild spoilers)”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Celebitchy says:

    Bellatrix – I’m looking for you to comment as our resident fashion expert.

  2. KDRockstar says:

    *DING*

    The sound of a major dent in the love for this film.

    It was a piece of crap movie with a cast of aging hags. Too bad Photoshop doesn’t work on film.

  3. Missy says:

    Has anyone suggested a makeover for these two women, someone call Maury

  4. Kevin says:

    Girl couldn’t sit there for more than 10 minutes because her depends were overloaded,,seriously though I always wondered where the heck Cyndi Lauper was these days.

  5. chamalla says:

    Yeah, KDRockstar, how dare women over 30 make other people look at their hideousness. 🙄

    I’m a big fan of Westwood – I could never actually wear anything she makes, but I love her work. I can see Fields being a fan, too.

    Fields got some slack for Devil Wears Prada, too, I don’t think designers like her nearly as much as directors do. I always liked what she did with SatC the series. Brand worship was a part of the show, too, IIRC. Just more focused on shoes than clothes.

  6. Larissa says:

    well…even tho the series was well known for its fashion ya don´t go to the movies to see a fashion show, do ya?

    It´s just a movie…it was not pretencious at all, and I liked!

  7. devilgirl says:

    Kick ass, I didn’t know Ronald McDonald had a sister, who is a designer no less. Sweet!

  8. Kaiser/ Hippacrat says:

    Westwood isn’t all that. I hated the Westwood wedding dress – I wished Carrie would have chosen the Oscar de la Renta, which was beautiful and coughcoughageappropriatecough.

    But the critics are right about it being too label-whoreish. It was too much. The belts took away from Carrie’s endless whines. Who’s with me?

  9. geronimo says:

    Also big Westwood fan. Didn’t see movie so can’t comment further but if it was little more than a label fest without any vintage or originality or eccentricity, then I can completely understand her comments.

  10. KateNonymous says:

    Agreed about the Westwood wedding gown. It was a lumpy, ill-fitting mess.

  11. Kaiser/ Hippacrat says:

    … a tranny hot mess.

  12. MSat says:

    Hmm – well, I think Westwood’s gown is the most hideous thing in the movie! It did not flatter Carrie/SJP with its severe neckline and weird shapes- and don’t even get me started on the bird hat that went with it. Total fug.

  13. Dingles says:

    ^^ oooh my god I need some Christian fierceness up in my life.

  14. headache says:

    From the header pics, I thought we were discussing Harry Potter extras.

    And how do you judge an entire film’s fashion after only ten minutes?

  15. Ron says:

    I think a big part of the label whorishness of the film was that Carrie now worked for Vogue. In the past she didn’t. Let me tell you first hand, when you work at some of these stores, magazines etc. You do become a label whore. I tend to be much the same way with vintage and Target and Versace and mix it up. However, I remember when I first started working there and i thought “I will never pay 250.00 for a belt” and a year later I was buying a 250.00 belt! The other thing, when you mention the designers they give you the clothes. So there you have the wedding dress scene, and it’s a freebie.

  16. paris herpes says:

    Why did this fashion skankwhore dye her hair such a putrid shade of orange? IS this supposed to be “fashion forward”? Because I think she looks like a geriatric Raggedy Ann doll!

  17. J9 says:

    Those pics are like looking at two corpses!! Geez !!

  18. breederina says:

    Vivienne Westwood is a style goddess. She can say or do whatever she likes it will not take away from the brilliance of her concepts and couture clothing. Anyone familiar with the tailoring and construction of her work knows of what I’m referring to, and she has a sense of humor, something sadly missing all too often.
    As for calling anyone over 30 with the nerve to be them selves a skank whore, oh baby just you wait. There’s a big comfy skank whore sign waiting in your future too!

  19. Banana Boat says:

    Go Breederina! Ha. I know we all get older so deal.

    Westwood is cool, Pat Fields is waaay overrated. Sorry, she is. And this film she did the proverbial ‘jumping the shark’.
    Westwood doesn’t need the nod from Fields anyway; she has long been established as a designer icon.
    The movie was lame, I saw it and it seemed awkward like they had trouble filling the 2 hrs. The scene where carrie tried on clothes to see if she should keep or toss them and her friends held up signs? Terrible. Totally sophomoric fluff. No one expected a serious movie but this was beyond weak.
    AND NO ONE DIES! I read that somewhere, that an actress leaked someone dies in the movie I was all excited (morbid? maybe) for some drama and no one died.
    Oy!

  20. mollination says:

    Well Vivienne’s stuff didn’t come in until after the 10 minute mark, and you know she stayed to hear her own name, so I doubt she left after 10 minutes.

    I rest my case, your honor.

  21. McKenna says:

    Since her own dress was in the film, does that mean she thinks her own designs are unoriginal? And being such a well-known designer, you’d think she’d have money to fix her teeth. Geez. Scary.

  22. spoonman says:

    Like this washed up old hag with F’d up hair and makeup really has any style sense????

    Who really cares about a crappy chick flick that fizzled in it’s 2nd week at the box office-something like a 60% drop from 1st week stats.

    I agree with the comments above who really wants to see some washed up 40-50+ woman-who have hit the wall literally-running around acting like they are every mans desire. Please!!!!

    SATC should have been a movie made straight to DVD-but all these woman-85% of SATC viewers were woman- that supported the movie used it as a girls night out excuse-kudos to SATC for rapping them at the box office. What is next? The sequel to get more cash???

    Hahahaha- hey if it sells why not!!!

    God is merciful-Thank you god for not letting anyone drag me to see this SATC crap!

  23. bc says:

    a couple of corpses…

  24. gg says:

    I wouldn’t waste a whit of my time watching this trash, but for the record, Vivienne Westwood is The Goddess of Cutting Edge Cool. Always has been.

  25. Bellatrix says:

    CB, here I finally am…

    And I’m afraid (well, it’s only an expression after all!) that I am on Vivienne’s side on this one.
    The movie was label after label after label.
    “Charlotte has pudding in her Prada…”
    Carrie’s vintage wedding suit did not balance out at all the overdose of “it” items that had been put all over the movie.

    Carrie Bradshaw is supposed to wear extreme (but very wearable) mixtures of pieces of clothing.
    Her label preference is definitely for the shoes (Manolo Blahnik, Dolce&Gabbana, Jimmy Choo, etc.). All the rest of her outfits are usually very well made mixes with almost never items that have featured in main publicity campaigns for labels.
    One of the “wow” pieces of the show was a silky vintage trenchcoat with a floral pattern, for example…
    The other girls also wear couture that is not necessarily to be recognized (even by the trained eye)…

    I was highly disappointed by this marketing feature. In the end, I was sad to see that the movie had lost that particular touch of true originality and aesthetic feature.
    I can sum up way too many items in the movie that I’ve seen all over fashion magazines (and their übermany ad pages).
    All the ladies were about labels, labels, labels.

    I thought the plot wasn’t too bad although very, very expected. It was a cute end to the series (here’s to hoping they do not make another one) for the fans.
    But the heart of the story, the “real fashion sense”, wasn’t there anymore.

    The worse of this labelling concept was that the items which were featured weren’t even nice. I thought the outfits looked like what Disney would have made of the SATC movie.
    There are merely two or three outfits I thought were nice and good in an honest fashion sense (one of which being, ironically, what the “young” Carrie wears when Carrie meets a bunch of girls who mirror her own group of girlfriends, at the very start of the film). And those were not very thrilling outfits (rather boring compared to what was worn throughout the series).
    Carrie was synonymous with kitsch&couture.

    I don’t know what happened to Patricia Field. So many “must have” (or considered so thanks to expensive marketing and publicity campaigns which I, sadly, know way too much of) items that were sent by labels who knew this was great and free publicity?
    Field lost her touch and stepped onto the Prada Devil’s side. I guess this can happen when you suddenly get all the expensive things you could never have before served on a silver plate (and sent by special airmail service by the labels themselves, almost begging you to feature them).
    The wedding gown shooting was much too long, I agree CB. Four would have been more than enough!
    I think I can even remember most: Vera Wang (oh, that’s so original!), Oscar de la Renta (again, so never-done-before for a wedding gown), Christian Lacroix (that was a nice one, I’m finally happy to say), Caroline Herrera, Lanvin, Dior and, finally, the Westwood one.
    And why choose to feature those big labels? Why not take less known designers too? It’s all about what the fashion labels sent (I’m still a little surprised they got to have the Dior by Galliano one).
    The bags in Samantha’s car were also completely obscene and simply anti-SATC (she can only pay 50,000 dollars for “her” ring but all those bags in her car are definitely worth at least twice as much). I can still remember seeing a mountain brown Gucci bags. See: great publicity!
    Tasteless and tacky.
    I won’t even go into the “You gave me Louise Vuitton” line. That was too much. You do not define yourself by a designer purse (which was a horrible Vuitton bag, by the way). And Carrie Bradshaw did prove that throughout those many episodes. Especially when she noticed that all her money had been spent on shoes ($40,000 she estimates at one point) and that she had no home. How could the film just jump the shark and take the opposite direction (spend money on labels and spend time on love, that’s all you need).

    Vivienne Westwood has just made a huge comeback with her Red Label brand and declared the punk movement (which she was the notorious Queen of) to be dead.
    She has said we need to move onto an active rebellion against propaganda. And that clothes ought to be worn several times, to be loved by the wearer and remembered.
    I can only understand and join this lack of emotion towards all those outfits in the movie (although I still managed to find the movie agreeable and okay: but I needed closure for the series)…

    Special extra for headache:
    1. Loved and laughed out loud (as in “really”, not just à la LOL trend) over your first remark (Harry Potter casting).
    2. Ten minutes were enough to know where the movie was going to fashionwise (even the quotes at the beginning such as something as “Every year, thousands of young girls come to New York in the hope of find the two big L’s: labels and love). I’m really afraid it was so although I was I could say the opposite, being the huge SATC fan I am.

  26. hello says:

    I agreed with the Loius Vuitton bag she gave to her assistant. I felt like it was stereotypical “ghetto dumb-dumb.” What would have been wrong with a classic LV bag? I don’t even like Vuitton because it’s all about showing that you have the label, but come on! At least a classic one.

    I also thought that the Vivienne Westwood dress was horrible.

    I have to say that the outfit I liked best in the whole movie was the green floral dress do, but that was vintage! Go figure! I also think that probably the best clothing in the movie was the downtime/ carrie is depressed wardrobe, and that was all brand stuff, but stuff you can buy at shop bop; not that stuff is cheap, but it’s not runeay. I actually own two of the “Carrie is depressed” sweaters! I think I have good taste and all 🙂 but if I’m buying clothes from SATC before it even came out there is something wrong.

  27. fee says:

    I enjoyed the TV series but I was dragged to this movie by my friends because just from the media releases i could tell i was going to be disappointed. I agree that the only decent outfit Carrie wore was the green floral dress, the stylist seemed to have gone out of their way to dress her in hideous label clothes. I too was rolling my eyes at the wedding dress scene – yawn – one label after another -and the final choice was the worst of them all. Not to say it was an awful dress – just on SJP it was – i imagine on a runway model it would look amazing.

  28. snappyfish says:

    Bellatrix.. I loved your comment. As an architect I love form and texture and how things work together.

    It is nice to see someone else who watches fashion as close as I do. When I am not reading Celebitchy I am flipping through WWD. Really love the new Preen line. Expected to see some in SATC. I was disapointed with the lack of up and coming labels. But I am a sucker for Balenciaga any day.( or a beautifully cut black Chanel suit and my knees go weak)

    However, if you want to show wedding couture. The most beautiful and unique dress I have ever seen was the one Galliano did for Gwen Stefani. I am sure you have seen it.

    Thanks again for the great and entertaining post. you rock…fashion girl.

  29. sassyspank says:

    THAT’S Vivienne Westwood?!?!?!? HOLY MOTHER OF GOD. I think I just screamed. Somebody fetch me my mommy – she’s terrifying!!!

  30. breederina says:

    Dear Bellatrix,
    It’s obvious you’re very fashion savvy and erudite so as
    one who enjoys reading your comments every time I have to ask : do tell, if you can, what do you do in this big world ?
    I’m not being factitious, I’m truly charmed and curious. Forgive any unintentional internet faux pas.

  31. xiaoecho says:

    Thank you breederina…@#18

    but didn’t you mean?’…oh babies, just you wait!…’

    I hope I look that good when I’m 67

    My favorite photo is of her as Maggie Thatcher (its’ a poster in my kitchen)

    Westwood is one of the immortals

  32. Bellatrix says:

    Here’s a quick reply.

    To all those thinking the Westwood wedding dress was not looking good on Carrie: I agree and I believe that SJP’s small height has a lot to do with it. She couldn’t pull of the bodice (lack of high stature) at all. But the runway pieces which had the same upper features did look great when they went down the catwalk.

    Snappyfish: indeed, it’s not just about a pattern, a shape, a construction and a color scheme (or lack of it, actually!). Texture is the bottom line of a good outfit (and good quality too). If the textures don’t “rhyme” as I like to say, you have something of bad taste in the end. Light reflection also depends almost entirely on texture. You being an architect, I am sure you bring great care to that.
    As for Gwen Stefani’s wedding gown: it still is a sigh-maker. It suited her incredible sense of style (by the way, she is a huge Vivienne Westwood fan) as well as her looks (platinum blonde hair, red lips and rather milky skin). If there ever was a wedding gown match made in heaven these last twenty years, this was definitely it. It was a unique piece too that was exclusively made for her. Lucky girl!
    PS : Balenciaga by Nicolas Ghesquière rocks, hell yeah (but all French ladies love his work)!

    breederina: I wish I could explain what I do for a living but I’m afraid I can’t really define it precisely. I work on regular basis with several fashion and literature magazines (my university studies were French Literature) as a journalist. I work on “compilation lists” during the London and Paris Fashion Weeks which is a concept I came up with. I am also an assistant to two fashion stylists (I’m still in my early twenties). A personal stylist for a small list of regular clients. And also the press attaché for two artists. And when I can’t find a piece of clothing I have in mind or come accross gorgeous fabric or amazing wool, I make my own designs. It’s a busy and ever-changing life but I love it just like that…
    I hope this answers your question 😳

  33. breederina says:

    Thanks Bellatrix, if you can keep up the pace you ‘re
    on your way to ruling in the fashion world,( or a nice size chunk of it), before you hit your 40’s!
    Should you ever decide to start your own fashion/style blog I’m there.
    BTW, a friend was planning her wedding around the time of Gwen Stefani’s. That incredible gown was her inspiration, and has yet to be topped as the one we always think of, the gold standard.

  34. sue mac says:

    Loved the clothes!!! Could have been put together better….Fields fell very short as stylist….The only area I thought they fell short was….shoes were nice-but not off the the beaten path….too main stream.The worst was SJP’s make-up……damn too harsh!! Loved Carries everyday clothes….could mix and match those forever.

  35. tenrags says:

    😕 I never watched the tv show. I enjoyed the movie but hated Carrie’s clothes. At one point my girlfriend and decided she looked like a circus clown.The other three ladies were always tastefully done. Carrie was a hot mess. I did love the movie.