Jennifer Aniston dons black bikini, bends over for the paparazzi

101126p4_aniston_b-gr_07

It must be a month ending in “y” or “er” because Jennifer Aniston is once again in a bikini, posing ass-out for the paparazzi. To her credit, her ass is spectacular, even though from here it looks a little sunburned. Of course, even from the distance, I feel more like her gynecologist (or proctologist) than a casual observer. This reminds me of that other time she posed ass-out for the paps. Or that other time. Or that other time. Aniston’s ass is pretty much a Cabo San Lucas landmark at this point. And please, don’t start in with the “she didn’t know the paps were there” argument. She knew. She goes to this place – Joe Francis’s resort/mansion – three times a year (at least) and gets pap’d every time. Her ass wanted attention, and The Ass got it.

101126p4_aniston_b-gr_02

101126p4_aniston_b-gr_01

101126p4_aniston_b-gr_03

Also – in many of these photos, Aniston is with that same Budget Johnny Weir looking dude (NOT Chelsea Handler!). Some sites are still trying to play it like he’s the new boyfriend, but my guess is still that he’s probably some new member of Aniston’s entourage. Perhaps a hair or makeup guy? And I’d also guess that his boyfriend is seriously pissed that Budget Weir spent the holidays with Aniston.

101126p4_aniston_b-gr_04

101126p4_aniston_b-gr_09

101126p4_aniston_b-gr_11

Photos courtesy of Bauer-Griffin.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

128 Responses to “Jennifer Aniston dons black bikini, bends over for the paparazzi”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Kaboom says:

    Can’t accuse her of not keeping in shape.

  2. Eve says:

    This reminds me of that other time she posed ass-out for the paps. Or that other time. Or that other time. Aniston’s ass is pretty much a Cabo San Lucas landmark at this point.

    LOLOLOLOLOLOL!

    And I’d also guess that his boyfriend is seriously pissed that Budget Weir spent the holidays with Aniston.

    Nah…his boyfriend probably looks better (more graceful and feminine — face wise, I mean).

  3. serena says:

    I really didn’t want to see her ass so perfectly.

  4. Eve says:

    I really didn’t want to see her ass so perfectly.

    I think that’s her best, most relevant angle.

  5. addicted says:

    Brad had that and didn’t want that, so did Mayer, Vince, Mayer again, Hopkins, and all the others she hides. While she might look good, it kills her to get that body so much that there’s no room for anything else.

  6. addicted says:

    HAHAHAHA she acts like Heidi Montsomthing, she knows very well what coverage the bikini shots get her. She is very consistent if it’s not about her love life, it’s about her crappy movies or her hot bod.

  7. tuscan sun says:

    You said it Kaiser. This is the reason she returns to this same exact spot over and over again. It’s because she knows (from experience) it’s a great vantage point for the paps to get shots of her bikini poses. If she wanted a private place, in a beautiful location, to sun herself, she could find one.

    This isn’t much different than Demi posting her bikini photos on twitter — only Aniston gets the paps to do her dirty work.

  8. louise says:

    Butt out and her always erect nipples are Jennifer’s trademarks. Frankly I never understood how people can claim she doesn’t know that the paps are there when without fail she always has her butt to the camera. What makes it more obvious is that she always puts herself in a weird position. She grabs something or stands up/down in a way that nobody has ever done it.

  9. Mizz Tickles says:

    I like the juxtaposition of Jennifer Aniston and Lilo, they kind of look a bit alike, they should do a movie together. Also, that sunburned ass looks painful, she will get freckles on it if she is not careful. But she’s probably got staff to take care of things like that. Also why is this dude who is reportedly gay looking at her behind like that?

  10. Teri says:

    I never ever got why people think she is a good actress..\Her career boomed when she married brad pitt and because of that nobody noticed that she cant act and is extremly annoying

  11. Liana says:

    she has more money and a better body than I will ever have, so kudos to her.

  12. anom says:

    This “woman” is the definition of BUTTA FACE!

  13. Me11 says:

    I believe this is why she take this trip to Cabo just so she can get this shot out to the media. To bad Aniston don’t really know how pathetic she really is…if she did she would run and hide her face. I really do believe Jen’s new lover is Handler. All the signs are there.

  14. mslewis says:

    Say what you will but the woman does look good in a bikini. Of course she spends three hours a day exercising and she doesn’t eat anything interesting or fun but still, that body is banging!!

    I’m not at all surprised at these latest “butt to the camera” pics. Remember that Jen has had three or four bombs in a row and the only talk about her has been how awful her movies are. So, now is the time to bring out the money shots . . . The Body on vacation WITH A MYSTERY MAN!! Good going Jen!!

  15. Trillion says:

    Enjoy it now, I say. Cuz when the sum of your value is what’s in your bikini, aging is gonna be a real bitch.

  16. la chica says:

    speaking of ass shots, Kaiser you could have included the pic with Gerard with his finger up her ass. lol!

  17. devilgirl says:

    Lots of haters here for something so insignificant!

  18. Eve says:

    Enjoy it now, I say. Cuz when the sum of your value is what’s in your bikini, aging is gonna be a real bitch.

    @ Trillion:

    Seriously, that’s one of the best comments I ever read about Aniston.

  19. Cat B says:

    Joe Francis? Seriously? The fact that she would hang out at his place so often shows a distinct lack of character. Who would want to spend time in a place built from the indiscretion/heartbreak of so many underage girls?? JF= Disgusting!!!

    PS these pics make me sad for some reason. Anyone else feel that way or am I crazy? 🙂

  20. Cyui says:

    A hot ass is Tyra Banks Naomi Campbell. When did no ass at toll come in style….

  21. TeeTee says:

    ass out again and its still boring..

    wish she’d take acting seriously, all of this time she could have taken lessons..nothing special..

    how old is she now??? still on this huh?

    sad

  22. whitedaisy says:

    @ Cat B. Totally with you on this. @ Trillion. Exactly.

    Aniston is pretty inoffensive, generally, but what the heck is she doing inhabiting Joe Pedovile ( typo and it stays) Francis’ place?
    And if she is so intent on maintaining her significance via her exterior, these photos will be even more sad and tragic when she poses for them in 10 and 20 years…

  23. guesty says:

    still. alone. maybe that’s the way she really wants her life to be.

  24. Syko says:

    That was her ass? I thought it was her face.

  25. carol says:

    Playboy is next for this once A lister. Until it became pretty clear that she can not act. Now she is playing the Pamela Anderson of the C listers. Sorry but I do not find her attractive and her thighs are a little heavy to me. But I think that is age more than anything else.

  26. birdgherl says:

    What an enviable body she has. She bores me but doesn’t offend me at all.

  27. Raven says:

    Considering that photo has not been photoshopped, I’d say she has nothing to be embarrassed about. She’s on vacation, she’s rich, she’s entitled to enjoy herself if that’s what she wants to do.

    And as far as aging and looks, the woman is over 40 and looks great. If she were ambitious, she could put out an exercise DVD that women would line up to buy.

  28. teri says:

    BWHAHAHA, we knew that was coming. Poor ol girls in heat.

  29. Just a Poster says:

    The only impression I have is..

    OUCH! Burnt buns! Burnt buns are the worst!

  30. meilamon says:

    Great ass, I can’t hate. If mine was like that I’d find reasons to show it off too!

  31. Cheyenne says:

    Maybe once her acting career tanks for good, she can publish a book filled with photos of her signature ass-in-the-air pose. Call it “The Aniston Ass Book” or something catchy like that. Her groupies will push it on Amazon and buy ten copies apiece.

  32. janie says:

    i dont really care either way about JA, she does have the hottest body in the biz. seems to me like she is just turning over though keeping her tan even. i dont know how you would avoid getting those shots. she is not hiding, but seems to me more kind of a whatever, take pics of my ass if you want attitude.

  33. Franny says:

    her thighs are too big for you?

    all of the haters should have to post a bikini picture of themselves along with their comments.

    she looks great for any age. if she wants to stick her perfectly toned ass at us everyday, its her business. its disgusting that you all sit here and tear her apart based on her vacation shots. get a life, maybs go work out so you don’t all sit at home, trash talking someone because you are jealous.

  34. Amanda says:

    Dammit, Jennifer Aniston’s body is amazing. WHYYYYYYY

  35. LIV says:

    I’m with meilamom. My butt looked like that and I’d be showing off too.

  36. Cheyenne says:

    @Franny: Why in the world would you assume that people are putting down a 40+ woman who is so desperate for attention that she flashes her ass to any camera lens within range because they are “jealous” of her? Believe me, nobody is jealous of a middle-aged woman whose ass is her only asset.

  37. Solveig says:

    I don’t want to be the devil’s advocate, but if she knew that the paparazzi were there and she’s showing her ass on purpose, is it safe to say that a pregnant AJ showed her boobs on purpose in her french chateau few years ago, right?
    Or that her babyshower’s pictures were “””accidentally””” leaked…
    I’m just saying that at a certain point they can’t avoid the paparazzi – no matter what they do or where they are – they just act like there’s no camera around.

  38. MyCatLovesTV says:

    She’s in her 40’s and time is running out for that ass. Luckily, she doesn’t have a private life so she can live in her gym.

  39. Henriette says:

    I agree about the Ewwwwwwwwww, Joe Francis comment! He’s disgusting and I don’t like the fact that Jennifer’s staying in a mansion that such disgusting behaviour paid for. Still… she’s an ugly girl with a lovely body who pays her own bills and gives to charity and doesn’t seem to be malicious and hasn’t popped out kids she doesn’t care about. Let’s hope that Joe Francis refrains from reproducing, too.

  40. Molly says:

    Kaiser, Isnt that Joe Francis in the photos? Or is he still in jail..?

  41. jzhz says:

    What ass? Looks pretty flat, to me. She looks much better from the front.

  42. observer says:

    She looks amazing. Jen is a very healthy-looking size, not too thin.

  43. Mei says:

    She looks amazing, but the fact that she’s at Joe Francis’s place is the grossest thing I’ve ever read about her. I don’t like the few people she associates with (Handler, Francis, Cox).

    Cat B: These pics also make me sad.

  44. brin says:

    Joe Francis is a pig….I thought Jennifer was better than that. The Kardashian klan are friends with him, too, but that doesn’t surprise me.

  45. Carrie says:

    Several other sites have claimed that the man in the photos is JA’s manager’s brother- who is gay, obvs.

  46. normades says:

    The hating here is so justified, her neediness is pathetic

  47. Camille says:

    I don’t care how ‘great’ her body is, I can’t get past her fug face. *Shudder*

    @Trillion: Excellent comment.

  48. Lukie says:

    @Mizz Tickles: he is telling her where to aim her ass for the paps.

    I find her boring as an actress, but I will never hate on the body. I would KILL to look like that when I am her age.

    Hell, I’d kill to look like that now!

  49. anom says:

    aniston’s BODY does look “great for her age”.

  50. Lulu says:

    Kaiser, your comments are spot on. Haha 🙂

    She’s obviously working the press. She’s a complete exhibitionist, and no different than most others in Hollywood. She only has better PR, and a gullible fan base, willing to buy whatever she’s selling. What gets me is that she constantly complaining about her privacy and the paparazzi, while obviously trying to get attention. It’s hypocritical.

    I find her attention-seeking behavior tacky and classless. And Joe Francis’s place? Just gross. That guy is all kinds of scum, as is Handler. Birds of a feather . . .

  51. truthSF says:

    Her body looks nice from the front, but her lack of no ass at all is really frightening!

  52. yes says:

    her body is very great!!!!!!

  53. mtb says:

    Perhaps she is just trying to fart in their general direction?

  54. anom says:

    maniston’s fans “come” about the body but never rave about the FACE. even they know a BUTTA FACE when they see it.

  55. Runs with Scissors says:

    She is gross and mean-spirited.

    This is “sad” because it’s always sad to see a woman who has reduced herself to only having her ass to offer to the world.

    She’s a huge disappointment. She has so many opportunities and resources but she’s just so shallow and self-centered. It’s such a waste.

  56. someone says:

    Can’t believe all the jealous people on here that run Jennifer down…shes harmless, beautiful and rich, and if you don’t like her movies then don’t see them, someone evidently likes them, the Studios keep paying her to make them…and her body is smoking….

  57. Josephina says:

    Franny-

    At age 40, we are expecting a lot more than physique, we are hoping also for maturity, wisdom, some spiritual depth… Sexiness has a lot more to do with your state of mind. She still does not have the “it” factor.

    She is a middle-aged actress better known for bikini shots and hair. I am hoping for more, but maybe ass shots IS the equivalent to being on top of the mountain. If there exists more substance to her, it would be nice to see it.

    Many actresses have great and greater bodies in their 40s…and are better known for their craft.

  58. mslewis says:

    @Trillion: Great post!! Truer words were never spoken.

  59. Canuck says:

    Francis has a house in Cabo as well as the one just outside of Puerto Vallarta? Lucky guy!

    I think if her ass looks like that at 41, she should be showing it off! She’s obviously worked hard to get it that way.

  60. ziggy says:

    girl looks good! i’d be happy to have that body and her money! and i’m no fan.

  61. allie says:

    I dont understand the haters!! The woman definitely has a beautiful body, very rich and a very kind individual. Why knock someone like that. Could it be jealousy? Why is there so much hate in the world? Try a little kindness people.

  62. DetRiotgirl says:

    I find it so hard to understand why everyone hates her so much. She’s so boring! I don’t know how so many of you find the energy to dislike her so aggressively. I mean, she’s practically coma inducing! How do you not fall asleep midway through talking about her vacations?

    I’ll probably get attacked for saying this. But, to be honest, the only reason I ever read posts about this woman, and usually the only reason I read articles about the also boring Angelia Joile, is to read the comments. JA articles are all the same; “look! She’s on vacation again and still has a great body!” or “look at lonely, pathetic Aniston!”. While AJ articles are always some made up tabloid BS about Brad or the kids. Snoozefest! But, the comments are always interesting. I feel like JA and AJ both stopped being fun to gossip about at least 4 years ago. But, people will not let the uncool triangle go!

    It’s like AJ fans come on to these threads to trash Jennifer because they feel like it makes the way AJ’s relationship started with Brad less sketchy if Jen is some old hag who deserved to lose her husband. On the flip side, on AJ posts, someone always feels the need to drag JA into it as a defense of why they can’t stand AJ. It was 5 years ago! Who cares? Maybe this rivalry isn’t always explicitly mentioned. But, it certainly feels like these posts are always about Team one or the other to me in the comments. JA and AJ seem to have a polarizing effect on people, and that must be why the tabs love them so much. Anyway, I love that people still seem to care. You guys are the only thing that make these stories worth reading!

    Anyway, her body is amazing. That is a banging body for ANY age! ITA with everyone else who said they would show that ass off too if they were her. Why not? She’s earned it. She really should quit acting and become a health and fitness guru. She would be more believable in that role than anything I’ve seen her in since friends.

    Also, ITA with everyone who feels grossed out by her association with Handler and the girls gone wild creep! Yuck.

  63. moopsie says:

    wow a lot of jen haters here, lol, like really she can’t help that she has a hot bod, crappy movies, etc,

  64. Cheyenne says:

    @allie: A woman over 40 needs to have going for her beside a hot body. Things like personality, intelligence, talent, abilities, etc. Once her body is no longer hot, which won’t be long now at her age, what will she have left? Zero. Zilch. Nada.

  65. e-non says:

    if that’s francis’ property, why in the world would you trust that he hasn’t got hidden cameras tucked away…

    put aside the obvious grossness of even socializing with that scumbag.

  66. echolocate says:

    Her body is good, obviously. I’ve never been one who thought her face was particularly attractive, but she does have pretty eyes.

    My primary gripe is that she’s friendly enough with Joe Francis to stay at his place repeatedly. The place may be luxurious, but it represents ill-gotten gains. At her age (and even a bit younger), you start to think of women in their late teens and early twenties (i.e., Joe’s victims) differently. They’re no longer contemporaries–I’ve noticed myself calling them “kids,” and feeling protective of them, even though I don’t have kids of my own. Since several have come forward who are underage, and many others have expressed regrets and/or alleged wrongdoing on his part, you’d think she might want to find a different rich friend.

    Doesn’t she have enough money and contacts to stay someplace else? Is he her dealer or something?

  67. Lala11_7 says:

    Sorry…never understood the Anniston HATE…perhaps she goes to the same vacay spot because she LIKES IT…

    I’m sure she’s bent over like that to tell all the haters to kiss that particular PERFECT SPOT!!!

  68. Dee Vine says:

    I dont understand the hate either. Will she only be accepted if she has a man draped over her arm and a brood of kids running around? Because otherwise she is “needy”? If this was a 41 year old hot bachelor away for a boys weekend, everyone will think it is pretty cool.

    So what if a pap in a tree with a telephoto lens gets a shot of her butt. It is her signature shot cos she happens to like being by the pool, just like Britney’s signature shot is at the gas station or Starbucks.

    If she can get paid millions for doing “mediocre” work, sun her toned body in Mexico whenever she feels like it, hang out with her best buds…more power to her.

    I assume we are mostly women here and why be so judgemental of a woman who is just living her life the way she wants to.

  69. Someone Else says:

    I’ve never been TeamJen but haven’t been a hater, but for some reason she really screams “trashy lush” these days. Was this always the case and I just missed it?

    It doesn’t help that I lost a ton of respect when she started hanging out with Handler. If I did, I sure as hell wouldn’t go public. Chelsea’s the most embarassing chick on the planet.

    I’ve never viewed Aniston as pathetic until today (attention whore, yes), but something tells me it won’t be long til Jen’s either in rehab or getting a liver transplant (or both).

    Drunken ass shots. Grow up, please.

  70. frewt says:

    Nice body but as boring as bat shit.

  71. Anon says:

    Yes Aniston has stayed at Joe Francis’s place before – has have many celebs, but she is not there in these pics, and has not been there in quite some time. The place in these pics is The One & Only Palmilla Resort and Spa in Cabo San Lucas (where she always stays in Cabo) – as another poster pointed out, Francis’s place is in Puerto Vallarta. Google it and you’ll find it to be a match based on the pics – along with the fact that the photo agency releasing these pics has mentioned her renting a villa there – something she wouldn’t need to do if she was at a residential property.

    And while I’m sure she’s aware that paps are probably trying to get shots of her, judging by the terrible quality these were taken from miles away – meaning that she probably could not see them very well at all, and like others have pointed out, is simply going about her vacation, shots be damned. She looks like she is simply spreading out a towel in these pics, and got caught in this position. If she was covering herself up and taking pains to avoid the deck and these shots then people would be complaining that she was too uptight and that there was something wrong with her figure – girl can’t win!

    And for those claiming al her movies bomb, she’s headed off the A-list and this is why these photos are coming out – get real. She’s one of the highest paid and one of the most bankable actresses. She’s shot four films this year and both of the ones she released ended up being successes, despite being written off by many after opening weekend.

  72. mine says:

    She can turn around and open up the front to the camera all she wants but men still don’t want her and her movies still bomb big time. Seems her female fans are the only one crushing on her stuff.
    In the long run what she need is people to buy tickets to her movie. That will not happen. Her career is going down faster than a boulder in Colorado.
    Just how many more bombs do she think the media is going to accept.

  73. bellaluna says:

    Wish my ass looked like that…

  74. Sarcasma says:

    Jen’s Ass is MINE. I want that Ass. I need that Ass

    I don get the Jen Hate either. Let it rest ppl.

    You dont like it. Don LOOK at it. Simple as that.

  75. whateva says:

    great from the front but that ass, lmao this is the flattest ass ive ever seen…

  76. Granger says:

    She looks amazing. She works hard for that body and it shows.

    I can understand vacationing at the same resort once a year. Everyone deserves (but very few people can afford!) to lie on a beach for two weeks while people spoil you rotten. But two or three times a year? When she can clearly afford to go anywhere in the world? That kind of insularity baffles me.

  77. mslewis says:

    She’s one of the highest paid and one of the most bankable actresses. She’s shot four films this year and both of the ones she released ended up being successes, despite being written off by many after opening weekend.
    ——————————————————
    Not true!! She is not “one of the highest paid” actresses. She used to earn around $8M/per movie but because she can no longer “open” a movie by herself, her price has gone down to around $5M/per and even less for the independent movies she’s done lately. And her latest movies released have not been successful. “Management” has earned LESS THAN $1M overall at the BO. Look it up. The only movie she has done in the past couple of years was the one with Gerry Butler and it was a success because of his international status. If you will notice, she does not have anything lined up after the one she is currently (or has completed) filming.

    Jennifer is still A-List but only because of her name. Nobody wants to pay to see her movies. But, that’s okay. The woman still has a nice butt and she’s still rich!!! That’s all that matters, right?

  78. olivia says:

    @Cheyenne: What, you again? You sound like a broken record.

  79. olivia says:

    J.A. couldn’t open a super market without help.Word is she is into coke…that’s why she parties heavilty at that creep’s place in Cabo.Since her movies flop and she can’t even score on T.V.,not much left …except to show her ass..PRETTY PATHETIC ,IF YOU ASK ME.

  80. Franny says:

    @Josephina – I didn’t know that bikini shots showed that she had no maturity, wisdom and spiritual depth. I was solely commenting on the fact that everyone making rude comments needs to look at themselves in the mirror. Unless you know Jennifer Aniston personally, and have seen how shallow she is, I don’t think you have much room to talk about her spirituality.

  81. Heather says:

    Ouch! that sunburn looks sore,

    All that sun tanning wont be doing her any favours for the future seeing as her career relies on her looks

  82. Cheyenne says:

    @Olivia: You can’t even get an original snark off, can you? Go on back to Female First, your co-hens have been missing you.

  83. mln says:

    Jen always looks amazing but considering that last year she invited Access Hollywood to her birthday party in Cabo and talked about the paps parked outside her house it’s safe to assume she knows they are there. She is probably drunk off her ass she is vacationing with Chealsea Handler and just having herself a great old time posing for paps. LOL.
    It’s pretty sad that a woman in her forties needs that kind of validation.

  84. skibunny says:

    Wow Cheyenne settle down. I hope if I ever get into trouble I have someone like you on my side. You come out with both pitols cocked and barrels fully loaded. Lol

  85. Anon says:

    mslewis: “She used to earn around $8M/per movie but because she can no longer “open” a movie by herself, her price has gone down to around $5M/per and even less for the independent movies she’s done lately. And her latest movies released have not been successful. “Management” has earned LESS THAN $1M overall at the BO. Look it up. The only movie she has done in the past couple of years was the one with Gerry Butler and it was a success because of his international status. If you will notice, she does not have anything lined up after the one she is currently (or has completed) filming.”

    I suggest you look it up. Since December 2008 (the last couple of years as you mention) she has released 6 movies, all of which were profitable except the ONE you mentioned, Management – why am I not surprised?! Marley & Me and He’s Just Not That Into You were great successes, The Bounty Hunter was a modest success, and Love Happens and The Switch more than doubled their production budgets at the box office, so would have been minor successes by the time DVD and TV sales were included. The only so-called flop was Management, which you fail to mention was a low budgeted indie. That’s a pretty high rate of success for any actor/actresses in this day and age – and why Jennifer is considered so bankable.

    And if TBH’s successes were all due to Butler, how come he never had the same success with Gamer? They were both leads, they did equal promotion and they both have fanbases that came out to support them.

    As for your remark about her no longer making $8 million/picture – according to who? Reputable sites like Forbes have stated her salary for TBH as being this much, and nothing has come out yet from her three forthcoming pictures, two of which are bigger-budget studio pics where she is a lead. There is no reason to believe she is making any less for either of these at the moment. She is probably not making her full salary for Horrible Bosses, given she is playing a supporting role – something many A-list actors do in that situation.

  86. redlips says:

    “Putting her ass in the air for the papz”? Really? Please! These photos are so grainy and obviously taken with a telephoto lens. Whoever took them should be sued for trespassing!

  87. original kate says:

    the woman is at a private beach resort in mexico…exactly what is she supposed to wear?

  88. Lulu says:

    Jen’s fans always attack anyone who doesn’t like her–“Oh, you are such a hater!” No, we can just see through her stupid games.

    The lady is a famewhore. She goes to the SAME beach resort so she can get her pics taken by the paparazzi. Kaiser has the proof. Then, she whines about how the paparazzi are “ruining her life.” It’s a joke. WHY would you go BACK to the same place where the paparazzi took your “ass in the air” pics after complaining about it??? It makes NO sense whatsoever. But Jen’s weirdo fans always have an excuse for the self-professed “retard.”

    She sticks her ass out in the air b/c she wants people to photograph it and talk about her. That’s why she brought Billy Bush and People magazine with her to Cabo–for the attention. She’s a famewhore. She’s not Ms. sweet and innocent, just living her life. She’s using her body for attention. It’s basic tits and ass. I don’t find her admirable in the least, and many others don’t either. Certainly everyone has a right to voice their opinon. But whatever 🙂

  89. The Hamm is My Dream Man says:

    Lulu: Every actor who talks about their personal life with magazines and on television shows is a famewhore. Nearly every actor/entertainer is a famewhore. That’s why they are a famous. Hardly anyone is famous without trying. They all want the attention and the validation. ALL of them. It’s not just Aniston. She isn’t unique.

    The people you never really hear about and actually have private lives and never talk about their families to the press actually do want privacy. Everyone else just pretends like they do.

    Keep this in mind: there are MILLIONS of actors/entertainers in this country. Millions. And we only hear about a select few. Why do you think that is?

  90. redlips says:

    @Lulu…..It is so obvious that these photo’s were taken with a telephoto lens. You know, like the pics taken of the “twins” while playing in their backyard! Remember how upset all of you were over the papz taking their photos.

    “Famewhore”? I think not….she is at a “private” resort in Cabo. She is not parading children out on the river for a photo op!

  91. Kim says:

    Why is this guy staring at her like a total creep in all the photos =( Time to get a new staff member Jenn.

  92. Cheyenne says:

    @Anon: “Marley @ Me” would have been an enormous success if Sadie from Podunk had starred in it, based as it was on a blockbuster book.

    Aniston was on of six co-stars in “HJINTY” and was not even one of the three major co-stars.

    For a film to be profitable it has to make at least double its production costs, plus its marketing and promotion costs, because half the box office revenue goes to the theater managers and half to the studio. “Switch” had a production budget of $19 million, cost around $15 million to market, and made $40 million. It may have barely broken even but that’s questionable. “Love Happens” cost $18 million to make, maybe another $20 million in marketing costs since it was very heavily promoted, and earned $36 million. I doubt the studio made a dime on that one. “Management” was an unmitigated disaster. “Bounty Hunter”, “HJINTY” and “Marley and Me” were all profitable, but not because she was the starring attraction. As for Butler, his films average $56 million in box office revenue whereas Aniston’s average
    $47 million, so I’d say the bigger draw in TBH was him, not her.

    She made $8 million for Marley and Me but nothing indicates that she made anywhere near that amount for the other 5 films that were released since 2008.

  93. angelika says:

    Her body is just normal, could be better keeping in mind that she never had kids, there are so many mothers over 40 and having really amazing bodies..I do actually find her a bit bulky..Her behind is not perky enough for a gymrat..But it is just an opinion..I m not a hater,but what surprise me that so many people want to shift their bodies with her.If that would really be possible why not to go for a better figure?Maybe it is just a matter of test.

  94. Canuck says:

    @Cheyenne: so in your opinion, Aniston was just accidentally in money making films? She was probably accidentally making a million an episode in Friends too. Using your standards as a guideline, the only money making film that Jolie has been acted in since MAMS is Wanted. The rest were money losing flops. Can’t have it both ways, can you? Or does AJ have magical fairy accountants who twist warp and weft the very laws of Hollywood only for her?

  95. Cheyenne says:

    @Canuck: Good lord, I never brought AJ into this, but since you saw fit to, let me remind you that she’s made only two movies since “Wanted”, which were “Changeling” and “Salt”, and both were box-office hits. “Changeling” earned almost $114 million, and “Salt” has earned $291 million and counting.

    BTW, this is what she earns per movie:
    Salary (Lara Croft: Tomb Raider) $7,500,000
    Salary (Mr. & Mrs. Smith): $10,000,000
    Salary (Wanted): $15,000,000+backend
    Salary (Salt): $15,000,000+backend

    (Source: http://www.the-numbers.com)

    No magical fairy accountants there, just some movies that make a shitload of money. Want some more numbers?

    JA: Average box-office per movie: $47 million
    AJ: Averabe box-office per movie: $55 million
    (source: same as above)

  96. Canuck says:

    @Cheyenne: Oh dear, you forgot to apply the Aniston accounting to AJ’s films. You know… double the production budget plus promotional expenses.

    The Good Shepherd, which she made after MAMS made just shy of $100 million. Now, considering Matt Damon who was getting $25 million+ for films before and after that one and Robert DeNiro were in it, plus AJ, I would say it didn’t meet the exacting standards that you have laid out for Aniston.

    A Mighty Heart…barely over it’s production budget… never mind it was an indy, because your Aniston standards mean that it doesn’t matter.

    I don’t consider voice over for animation as actually acting, so I’m not going to include those.

    Changeling, $113 million, barely double it’s $55 million production budget, nowhere near making money if you count what it costs to promote a film into Oscar contention.

    Salt. Possibly broke even as it doubled the production budget of $110 million + probably enough for the promotional budget.

    It’s a shame the woman doesn’t have a great ass, good thing she has 6 kids to parade around instead eh?

  97. Lulu says:

    @Hamm. You’re defending her? really? really?

    I do agree that most of them are famewhores. Definitely not admirable. But that wasn’t my point at all. I wasn’t saying that she is better or worse than anyone else in Hollywood.

    I don’t understand why people have to scream “HATER” at you because you don’t worship the lady with her ass in the air–waiting for the paparazzi to take her picture–as they have SO MANY times before. Looks like her bum got sunburned waiting for the paparazzi, too. Haha–serves her right. 🙂

    @redlips. Are you talking abou the Pitts? Why talk to me about them? Go follow the crazed Pitts. You care more about them than I do.

  98. Anon says:

    Thanks Canuck – the way some try to twist the numbers to suit their agenda depending on whether they like a star or not is ridiculous. I’m sure though your rationale will fall on deaf ears.

    Cheyenne – there is info out there to support Aniston’s salary from both The Switch and The Bounty Hunter being $8 million. A little magazine by the name of Forbes.

    And where are you getting your alleged marketing and promotion numbers for Aniston’s films? Those numbers rarely ever come out for any film, and I’ve never seen mention of them on any site, so I would be interested to know. Particularly since you list The Switch’s promotion as being so much when it was roundly known that it suffered from lack of promotion due to the studio sale.

    Also, like Canuck I have to ask if you seriously think Aniston was simply lucky to have found herself in successful movies and tv due to the efforts of others? Because simply listing an actor/actress’s average opening as a reason is no evidence of this. Besides the fact that the genre of the film can be a big impact, what if these actors were simply in films made successful by their co-stars (to use your reasoning), which would then have falsely inflated their averages?

  99. Cheyenne says:

    @Anon: Ballpark figure for marketing and promotion is anywhere from $15 — 40 mil. That includes TV commercials, billboards, newspaper advertisements, internet ads, etc. I remember “Love Happens” being VERY heavily promoted, lots of TV ads, internet ads out the wazoo, billboards all over the place, posters plastered all over the sides of the buses — that kind of marketing doesn’t come cheap. And the studio has to recoup that from the box office receipts, AFTER they split 50/50 with the theater managers.

  100. Cheyenne says:

    @Canuck: Honey, if I had to choose between a great ass on the one hand, and Brad Pitt and his six kids on the other, I’d take Brad and the kids any day of the week.

    Five years from now, at the outside, that great ass is going to look like a waffle iron, all flat and criss-crossed with cellulite. And then what’s she going to have left? I can see her now, desperately wiggling her flat, wrinkled ass at any camera in sight. Only no one is going to want to take a picture of it any more.

  101. Canuck says:

    @Anon: I would actually add that if you remove the voice over animated film totals from Jolie’s average opening amount, she comes in at about $41 million, less than Aniston.

    @Cheyenne: It seems unlikely that anyone would spend $40 million promoting a film that cost $18 million to make. Just sayin…

  102. Cheyenne says:

    anon: I have to ask if you seriously think Aniston was simply lucky to have found herself in successful movies and tv due to the efforts of others?
    ======================================

    Oh good heavens, get real, will you? If Aniston hadn’t married Brad Pitt, and been subsequently dumped, she’d be just another B-list sitcom TV actress. The best thing that ever happened to her career was her divorce.

  103. Trippin says:

    Great ass for sure but why ain’t nobody tappin’ it? Pretty bad when you can’t even keep a creep like Jon Mayer’s attention. That’s gotta hurt. Maybe she’s been waiting for Courtney Cox to be a single woman.

  104. Cheyenne says:

    @Trippin: Now you know you are wrong for that! ROTFLMAO!!

  105. Cat B says:

    Re: people supposedly hating JA because she’s single- Does anyone here care if she ends up with a husband and kids or not? I sure don’t, other than it’s mildly annoying that she keeps dragging that topic into every interview, thereby propagating the ‘lonely single woman’ stereotype everyone here seems to hate :).
    No, you can do just as much giving and loving as a single woman, even more so considering you don’t have a partner’s and children’s emotional needs to attend to. So why isn’t she trying to give back, other than the usual PR stuff all actors are required to do? That’s what bugs me. Life isn’t just about enjoying yourself.

  106. Sawa says:

    i don’t hate the woman but that’s only a “great ass” according to flat-assed Caucasian women standards. she is also entitled to shove it in the air. i find her boring too but, like DetRiotGirl, i like to read the comments and post. plus, if she’s so amazing why is her life so pathetic. well, it’s pathetic to me. like does she have any family? only friends, i see. remember Jen, friends can leave you high and dry. Handler, Joe Francis, etc. she sure knows how to pick ’em!

  107. Canuck says:

    @sawa: She’s a Caucasian woman, what other standards do you think should apply?

  108. Cheyenne says:

    @Canuck: You have to spend a buck to make a buck. If $40 mil in promotion generates $150 in box office revenue, it’s money well spent.

    In the case of Love Happens and Switch, nothing could help those bombs.

  109. Vanessa says:

    Canuck is right, even taking cheyenne’s average box office numbers for both (which are a lot closer according to box office mojo) Anniston is technically the more bankable star!

    She costs a lot less than Jolie, so forgetting promo budgets, she makes the studio more profit per film. And without Kung Fu Panda (which Angie was in for maybe 5 seconds) it’s really no contest at all.

  110. Kim says:

    JA made $8M for Marley and Me in 2007 and she is still making $8M a film in 2010 for TBH. Whereas AJ’s salary for MMS was $10M up front, $15M+backend for Salt and reportedly $20M for The Tourist.JA makes the studios more money. JA can film 3 films a year and AJ film one a year and it evens out in terms on total annual income. Oh yeah lets not forget JA’s perfume line.

  111. Cheyenne says:

    @Kim: You might as well forget that perfume line. Nobody seems to be buying it.

  112. Cheyenne says:

    @Vanessa: Want to trot out a few more numbers?

    Box office total for Aniston’s last six movies (Switch, The Bounty Hunter, Love Happens, Management, HJINTY and Marley & Me): $626 million.

    Box office total for Jolie’s last six movies, not including KFP or Beowulf: (i.e. Salt, Changeling, Wanted, A Mighty Heart, The Good Shepherd and Mr. & Mrs. Smith: $1.3 billion.

    Not even close.

    (source: http://www.the-numbers.com)

  113. starduster says:

    Why all the emotion for a woman who when faced with the most horrifying end to a marriage managed to face it with grace. She hasn’t hurt anyone or asked anything of any of you. You don’t like her acting…don’t go see her movies.

  114. Cheyenne says:

    @starduster: if you call bleating and whining to the media “facing it with grace”… whatever.

  115. Canuck says:

    @Cheyenne: You seem to really be stretching on that promo budget argument. Face it, if they couldn’t or wouldn’t spend more than $18 million on making the film, how likely is it that they could or would spend $40 million on promoting it? Pretty much zero.

    If it costs $500 million to make films that net $1.3 billion, and we apply your Aniston accounting standards, that means that the first billion is taken up by the old “twice the production budget” rule. That leaves $300 million for 6 films, from which we need to deduct the promotion budget. So, if you think a studio is going to spend $40 million on a JA film that only cost $18 million, don’t you think they will spend at least that much or more on an AJ film that cost $110 million to make? Because that only leaves $50 million per film for the promotion of each. And you just KNOW that Both Salt and the Changeling well exceeded that.

  116. Vanessa says:

    Oh Cheyenne, you poor thing! I’m sorry if your own logic failed you, but I haven’t ‘trotted out’ any numbers at all, you did all the legwork by yourself. And sadly you still haven’t actually disproved my point, which is that if their average gross is only a couple mil apart, and AJ makes double what JA makes, then Jennifer is technically the more bankable star.

    I’m not going to bother adding up any numbers, I’m bored at work, but not nearly that bored or invested, but I will point out that taking the gross of their last 6 movies is ridiculous. If we only did that then Zoe Saldana is the biggest movie star around. We were talking about their average lifetime gross, and their reported salaries- which you yourself provided the numbers for.

    They are both A list movie stars, and your disliking JA doesn’t change her bankability, even with a few recent stinkers under her belt.

  117. Cheyenne says:

    @Vanessa: Whoa! Weren’t you the one saying “no contest”? No contest, indeed, but the other way around.

    Tell you what: if a studio was looking for an actor to star in a movie (let’s say any type movie), wanted to make a lot of money on the film, and had to choose between Jolie and Aniston, which one do you think they would pick? Three guesses and the first two don’t count.

    And please don’t say, well, they would pick Aniston if it was a rom-com. All she can play is rom-coms. The studios would rather have a versatile actress than a one-trick pony.

  118. Josephina says:

    Cheyenne’s point is that Aniston and Angelina may both do movies but are certainly not in the same class. Once you start winning awards and are nominated for roles you play, like it or not, it really does put you in another hemisphere. Furthermore, Aniston is still unable to carry ANY movie on her own( after many attempts) and EVERYONE knows this fact. This is what star power is about.

    So… go ahead.. split hairs about box office numbers. Attacking Cheyenne is futile…and silly.

    Angelina is a huge U.S. AND International Star and has been such for over 14 years. Jennifer got started much later in movies. While she has had some success in movies as a supporting actress, she has not been recognized for her work in film as much as she was recognized for her work on TV.

  119. Lauren says:

    Faced the end of her marriage with grace? BWAHAHAHA.

    She went to Vanity Fair, cried big crocodile tears, brought her friends along to badmouth Pitt (he never wanted kids!) and then posed semi-nude. Yeah, showing your ass to the world says class and grace. It was always about saving her image + career. Her fans wonder why people dislike her, meanwhile, I wonder what kind of delusional nut actually buys anything this manipulative fame addict is selling? I don’t get the love. I think her fans must live in fairy land.

    And, NO, I’m not a Brange fan either. They’re both just as manipulative with their “we’re so in love” PR blitz. BLAH to both.

  120. Canuck says:

    @Josephina: No hair splitting going on, and Cheyenne’s point was the Aniston’s movies never make money while Jolie’s do, and had nothing to do with which stratosphere either moves in.

    Pointing out that if the same standards are applied to both would make AJ a money-losing actress too isn’t attacking, unless you think that calling someone out on that sort of dishonesty is worse than actually being the one doing it.

    Jolie has only been acting for 14 years and she certainly hasn’t been a huge international star for all of that time. The first of her films to get international distribution was in ’99. And her first honest to goodness international hit was MAMS, where the “triangle” story frenzy served the film well, as did Pitt’s status as an international star. If Pitt hadn’t been one himself, none of the foreign press would have bothered to print a thing about it and her name would not have become familiar abroad in the way it did.

    In fact, I’m more than a little convinced that the reason they travel so much and spend so much time out of the US is to maintain interest in them abroad, since those are the numbers that push her B.O. results ahead of someone like Aniston. Aniston does well domestically, but doesn’t pull in the numbers abroad.

  121. Camille says:

    Wow, this thread sure brought out the ‘crazies’. Very entertaining 😆 😀 .

  122. california angel says:

    Oh no how did AJ get into this post hahahaha! And Jen either has a really bad wedgie or she purposely turned her bikini bottoms into a thong to avoid tanning lines lol. I don’t think that I would feel comfortable showing that much of my butt to cameras but then again I’m not a model or actress, to each their own: )

  123. Josephina says:

    Canuck:

    Eighty percent of the world’s population lives OUTSIDE the U.S.; ask ALL the other big stars/entertainers who have an international following– you want to pull in the numbers from BOTH sides. All mega entertainers know this (Beyonce, Lady Gaga, Madonna, Sting, Oprah, the Beatles.) But you have to know HOW to pull in the draw of the international crowd, too. Some can and some cannot.

    Angelina, Brad and Johnny Depp, to name a few, CAN. If their name is on something, it draws a huge crowd. It’s smart or smarter business. No one is saying that you cannot make money off of the U.S. crowd. At this point in time, the afore-mentioned people ARE mega watt stars today and have very little competition. When they show up at the red carpet, people are going bonkers. Have you seen ANY of the YouTube coverages of any of Brad/Angelina’s red carpet moments in the LAST 5-6 years? People go crazy!!! Even in the U.S. since her divorce, Aniston does NOT draw the same kind of reaction or the number of persons at her red carpet events.

    You do not have to be a great actress to make money in film, and Aniston is proof of that. She is popular enough. Aniston does not have sequels under her name like Brad, Angie or Johnny Depp. Most industry experts and film critics find Aniston to be a mediocre actress at best.

    If you think that Aniston is at the top of her game because she “makes the studios money,” that there is no room for improvement as an actress or at the box office, then so be it. Then all she needs to do is keep making 3-4 movies per year…and keep the body tight and tanned.

    BTW, Angelina Jolie already had international status from the Lara Croft Tomb Raider franchise. If you ask anyone who is the bigger star in the U.S., they will say Angelina Jolie over Jennifer Aniston.

  124. Canuck says:

    @Josephinea: Thank you for the little social studies lesson, but since I live outside of the US myself, I’m pretty much aware that the world doesn’t revolve around the USA and it’s population.

    I was not disputing that she is an international star, I was disputing that she has been one for 14 years as you say. I also didn’t imply that having a strategy is a bad thing, as I’m the one who pointed it out in the first place.

    I would also dispute that she was a big international star after Lara Croft, had that been the case for any demographic outside of the video game playing teen boy slice her next films would have done better. It’s easy to see that from the poor returns on her next two films, neither of which targeted that demographic, that she wasn’t pulling in other people.

    Original Sin bombed despite having Banderas in it as well, his presence should have been a European sales guarantee. Life or Something Like It was her attempt at a rom-com and her first film where she was the only “star”. It also bombed, and only took in about 2 1/2 million in foreign receipts. You can argue all you like about when her status as an international star started, but if you look at the numbers it’s pretty obvious that MAMS and it’s surrounding media coverage was what really put her into the international public’s eye and made her name recognizable to the rest of the world.

    Something else to chew over: both Jolie and Aniston’s films don’t tend to do well when they are targeted outside of their respective demographic groups. When Jolie does an action film and shoots people, it does well. When she does something else, not so much. When Aniston does a rom-com, it does well. When she does something else, not so much. When you are a woman, BOTH of those niches are age limited. If Aniston keeps up her body, she’s most certainly figured out that you need to look the part to get the roles.

    One final comment: It’s not an easy thing to break out of the public’s perception of you when you have been playing a well loved character on a hit TV series for 10 years, whether it be in another TV show or a movie. Critics actually say that when Aniston does something outside of her comfort zone, she does a good job of it. That doesn’t mean that the public WANTS to see her playing something outside of their own mental comfort zone of what they think JA should be doing onscreen. I’m sure that like myself, you can think of a number of well loved actresses/actors from TV that disappeared after their show was done, because no one would accept them as a different character. Aniston has escaped that fate so she must be doing something right, even though it seems to annoy the Jolie fans that she’s still around. Aniston is after all, in the top 10 actresses who give the best return on investment dollar for dollar, and however much it looks to the public that the big expensive films are all that counts in the money game, it’s the less expensive ones that pay the bills.

  125. Camille says:

    Wow, who knew that JA had crazy fans like the Brangeloonies? Some people really need to let all of this shit go and go outside and breath some fresh air 😆 . Life is for living folks, not constantly going on and on and on and on arguing such truly pointless and full of bullshit stuff! It really doesn’t matter in the bigger scheme of life. 😀

    This thread needs to be locked 😆 .

  126. Canuck says:

    @Camille: It’s a rather sad state of affairs in your mind if you consider a civilized discussion as “crazy”. Btw, what are you doing all the way back here on page 8 (as of now), if not to read the comments on an old post?

  127. Camille says:

    @Canuck: Did I strike a nerve? Oops.
    Well not that it is any of your business really :D, but since you are concerned/curious about what I choose to do on a gossip site lol, I came back for a looky at the comments again because I found some of the comments and ‘discussion’ crazy and hilarious.
    People getting riled up over truly nothing of importance. Now *that* is a ‘sad state of affairs’. 😉

    Don’t worry I will not be back now, you sure told me 😆 . I will leave this thread all to you, knock yourself out :D.
    And, Carry on! (as Tim Gunn would say 😉 ).

  128. Canuck says:

    @Camille: I’m sure you won’t be able to help yourself.

    I’d be interested in hearing your definition of “riled up”, apparently it seems to mean “anyone stating an opinion that I don’t agree with”, and then you go on to label it “crazy”. How incredibly lucky you are to see the world in blacks and white with no greys, and no desire to admit there might be some. As they say… ignorance is bliss. What a happy camper you must be!