Chelsea Handler attacks Angelina, talks up Aniston in a new interview

wenn2810628

We’ve actually had requests for yet another story of Chelsea Handler being a drunken mess, yet again. Do you know how happy I would be to ignore the whole sordid mess? Yes, it’s funny to watch the Brangeloonies and the Jen Hens battle it out in The Great and Unending Uncool War, but there’s just so much nastiness all around, it’s kind of giving me an ulcer. But you asked for it. Okay, to recap: over the weekend, Chelsea Handler did a stand-up act, and she ended up shouting down a heckler by going off on an obscene tangent about how Angelina Jolie is C-U-Next-Tuesday, amongst other things. On her Monday show, Chelsea defended herself by saying that she’s always made fun of Angelina, but she didn’t say anything about Jennifer Aniston and their trip to Cabo and whether Aniston had anything to say about the tirade.

Then, yesterday, Star Magazine released their cover – a story any of could have written in our sleep. According to Star, Jennifer Aniston “broke down” and confessed to Chelsea that she “can’t stop loving Brad.” It was low-hanging fruit for the tabloids – Aniston and Handler were just together in Cabo two weeks ago, and Aniston has never protested Chelsea’s nasty attacks on Jolie, ever. Then, just hours after Star released their cover, PopEater ran sympathetic Aniston pity party story about how angry Aniston is over Chelsea’s tirade:

“I’ve been making fun of Angelina Jolie since she made out with her brother,” Chelsea Handler laughed. “If I’ve learned nothing from this, it’s to write some new jokes.” Sources tell me Jennifer would agree, except she doesn’t think this is a laughing matter and has told her feisty friend to give it a rest.

“Jen has gone out of her way to keep her private feelings about that woman who stole her husband private and has always asked her friends to do the same,” an insider tells me. “She is furious with Chelsea for bringing the whole situation back to life again and landing her on the cover of a weekly magazine tomorrow with a Brad headline.”

Sources tell me Jen hasn’t felt this betrayed since John Mayer held a “press conference” to announce he was breaking up with her. Yeah, that was pretty bad.

The notoriously private actress has kept her inner circle close. Two of the newer additions to that exclusive club — John and Chelsea — have both gone and blown it.

“Jen doesn’t just let these sort of people in her life,” a friend of the actress tells me. “She hates drama or unnecessary attention and certainly doesn’t want to ever see her face on a tabloid again with a headline about Angie or Brad.”

I’m told Jen wants badly to believe Chelsea didn’t revive her Angelina-skewering jokes now that the two are good friends.

“Even so,” the friend admits, “she’s happy Chelsea made it clear her rant had nothing to do with her and wishes she’d just keep her big mouth shut in the future.”

[From PopEater]

“Jen has gone out of her way to keep her private feelings about that woman who stole her husband private and has always asked her friends to do the same.” – except for all of those times she didn’t. Except for getting her friends to bash Angelina and Brad in Vanity Fair. Except for going off on Angelina in 2008 in Vogue, and even bringing up the Jolie-Pitt kids in GQ in the same year. Except for all of these “leaks” from well-placed “sources” who also let us know exactly what she’s thinking about “that woman who stole her husband.” Also: the fact that the “source” is still using language like “that woman who stole her husband” makes me think that Aniston is sitting at home alone in a caftan, rocking and stroking her hair in between sticking pins in her Jolie Voodoo doll.

Also – just out today, Chelsea has a new interview in Glamour Magazine where she’s talking about the triangle bullsh-t even more. Hint: Aniston emails her “funny” jokes, probably about how Angelina is a C-U-Next-Tuesday.

KATIE COURIC: Your humor can be pretty out there. Do you self-edit?
CHELSEA HANDLER: I’m pretty clear about what I’m willing to say and the lengths I’m willing to go, and I think it’s important to be politically incorrect. You don’t want to be nasty, and you don’t want to be malicious. But it’s OK—I mean, funny trumps everything in my mind.

KATIE COURIC: Is there anybody who really makes you laugh? A woman who really makes you laugh, other than me?
CHELSEA HANDLER: Jennifer Aniston makes me laugh. She’s irreverent and hilarious, and she sends me really, really funny e-mails.

KATIE COURIC: She’s funny?
CHELSEA HANDLER: Very.

KATIE COURIC: And speaking of that, wow, girl, you went off on Angelina Jolie recently.
CHELSEA HANDLER: Yeah, I’m not a fan. She just doesn’t come off to me as a sincere woman. She seems like a woman that you’d really want to avoid.

KATIE COURIC: What’s your take on bullying?
CHELSEA HANDLER: I think bullying of anybody, whether they’re gay or straight or anything in high school is unbearable. I dealt with it, and I did it. It’s terrible. And you want the school to tell people that at some point you all grow up, and it was a terrible thing to do, and be a reminder of it’s never acceptable. I was tortured for a year in school by the older girls. They didn’t like the way I looked; I dated a guy that was a senior when I was a freshman. And it was awful. But I think bullies just need to be taught by their parents how to treat other people.

[From Glamour]

So despite Camp Aniston’s attempt to distance themselves via PopEater, Chelsea is still talking up her friendship with Aniston. There are only two versions of this story: either Aniston is completely fine with Chelsea being her nasty, coked-out attack dog and she completely cosigns everything Chelsea says and does OR Aniston does not agree, but those feelings aren’t strong enough to keep her away from being friends with Chelsea, which speaks volumes as to the kind of people she surrounds herself with. Also, I’d just like to note something else – this Glamour interview is relatively tame as far as Chelsea talking up her Team Aniston status. You want psychotic, you should go back and re-read what she said in Rolling Stone.

wenn3107756

wenn2810625

Photos courtesy of WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

188 Responses to “Chelsea Handler attacks Angelina, talks up Aniston in a new interview”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. bite me says:

    love it, hehe, thanks kaiser, oh yeah poor jen 🙁

    EDIT: can’t wait for the people cover on how jen is coping sex years after her divorce

  2. Samigirl says:

    So she hates bullies…and she thinks it’s a terrible thing…but it’s ok to shit talk another woman? Everything she does is paramount to bullying. Hypocritical, unfunny, bitter b*tch.

  3. brin says:

    Chelsea Handler & Katie Couric in one story….double barf.

  4. Jan says:

    Jen lost her man, to a woman who was more fun and WANTED KIDS. Something he has said for years he wanted. It has been over 5 years and 6 kids later. GET OVER IT. I think Chelsea wants to sleep with Jennifer and that’s why she is talking all this noise.

  5. mln76 says:

    I love her take on bullying, good to know that she is against bullying BTW what did she say about Maddox and Shiloh again?

  6. Missy says:

    This disgusting woman is actually making me feel sorry for Aniston. She is seriously making Jen look like a bitter, lonely old bag still hung up on her ex

  7. Bee says:

    As the saying goes “you lay down with dogs, and you end up with fleas.” Take note Jen. CH just seems like the unpopular girl in high school who’s been invited to the cool girl’s table. And she’ll do anything to defend her queen bee, aka Jen Aniston. Also, why would JA be friends with someone who used to call her “sad and lonely.” Is she a masochist or what? Oh wait, she did date John Mayer for a while, and if that’s not some form of self punishment I don’t know what is.

  8. Johnny Depp's Girl says:

    I still think she’s dropping JA’s name for attention. I would hate to think Jennifer is close to this stupid woman.

    Chelsea cant get a lot of media attention by herself, she has to use people… and look, it’s working!

  9. Crash2GO2 says:

    Disgusting woman.

  10. Cheyenne says:

    @Kaiser: Bottom line for either version: people judge you by the company you keep. ‘Nuff said.

  11. Lori says:

    There is no way that woman is 35.

  12. LOVE ANGELINA says:

    I am more horrified that Katie Couric interviewed Handler. You would think they would give Katie a more important person to interview…ouch.

    I think EVERYONE has come to the conclusion that this makes Handler and (I guess guilty by association), Aniston look bad, which is not a problem for me. Handler certainly looks petty because she has never meet Angie so she looks like an idiot just for spouting off about a person she has never meet. Which even further implicates Aniston because why go after Angie with like that, in that manner when you don’t even know her personally and have NEVER met her.

    Well she looks totally stupid.

  13. Bee says:

    I forgot to mention that CH looks like a feral rabbit in the header pick. Ugh. Just ugh. What an ugly woman on the inside and out. Also, in that Glamour interview she had the nerve to say she doesn’t make fun of children. So I guess speculating on the sexuality of a four year old isn’t considered making fun of them in her world.

  14. Sakyiwaa says:

    so CH has met AJ before and knows for a fact that she’s insincere. lmao! The more I think about it the dumber it sounds. So a man leaves his wife for another woman and when his wife asks “why?” Man goes like: “it wasn’t me, sweetheart. She stole me from you.” If I were the wife I would ask, “Well, how come you were open for stealing?” oh yeah, I can hear some dumbass guy giving his wife that excuse and his dumber wife going straight to attack the woman. Just ask the men.

  15. Tanjee says:

    Isn’t Handler sleeping with a married man? At least he was when they first hooked up? I think the guy is the CEO of E! Networks and others?

  16. Louwho says:

    By the same logic, Love Angelina, you look like an idiot for being so obsessed and in love with someone you have never met.

  17. Runs with Scissors says:

    too funny that Couric pointedly asked her about bullying and she totally missed the point of the question.

    Lol at this weak attempt to ‘distance’ Aniston from this. Aniston is the BULLY and a COWARD for constantly milking the situation and putting everyone else up to do the dirty work so she can still look ‘sweet and down to earth.’

    Aniston’s pride was hurt, nothing more. She admitted that there was no affair, that the split was amicable, etc, that is, until she smelled MONEY and she’s been milking it ever since.

    If she had a shred of decency, she would have put a stop to this AJ bashing long ago and CERTAINLY wouldn’t have allowed her friends to attack AJ’s children. I mean WTF?

    Nice to make money off of spouting hate-filled racist and homophobic comments about children. Aniston is shameless. Even if there had been an affair, she would still be a MONSTER to allow this kind of bullying to be done by her friend or her fans.

  18. Moreaces says:

    Also, why would JA be friends with someone who used to call her “sad and lonely.” Is she a masochist or what? Oh wait, she did date John Mayer for a while, and if that’s not some form of self punishment I don’t know what is.
    ==============
    Not only did she date him once, she took him about for a secound round.

  19. gloriaad says:

    Angelna Jolie is such a big star it is a pity that two sorry disgusting people, Jennifer Aniston & Chelsea Handler have decided they want to ride on her coat tail, this is exactly what is happening. If Brad Pitt had left with a nobody you would never have heard from Jennfer Aniston again. This is an orchrestrated plan by two failures, destroy Jolie’s career by calling her dirty names in public, ain’t gonna happen, Chelsea Hanler looks like a drunken fly.

  20. guesty says:

    dear chelzzzzzzzzz….get a clue & stfu. k? thxs.

  21. Jackson says:

    I wish this nasty troll-woman would just crawl back under the rock from whence she came. And fight your own battles, JenJen.

  22. Sakyiwaa says:

    In any case, lemme add that AJ does not need CH or JA validating her. not when she’s got lovely Brad to say wonderful stuff like this about her:

    “I have love in my life, a soul mate—absolutely.”

    “My real fear at this point is the safety and health of Angie and the kids. The fear of losing them is what keeps me up at night.”

    “She’s my great love..and a fantastic mother…”

    “There’s only ONE woman in my vision”

    “I couldn’t do anything better for my children than to give them Angie as their mother”

    “I get defensive. [They’re] talking about not only the woman I love, but one of the people on this planet who I have the greatest respect for. I think she’s as honorable as anyone I’ve ever met.”

    “She is a beautiful woman but she’s also so warm and kind as a person and that makes her even more beautiful. What can I say? I’m a very lucky man.”

    “After meeting Angie, I became a NEW man, both intimately and artistically speaking.”

    “When Angie is usually shot she’s seen as a femme fatale, she does that very well, but also she has the biggest heart and inexhaustible spirit and sweetness and goodness, and she’s the real glue of the family, and that’s what I wanted to portray in that.”

    “My family comes before everything else. No film will ever take precedence or fill me with the kind of joy I have as a father and partner.”

    “Being in the room with those two women is great fun..It’s like sitting down with Roosevelt and Churchill…Only much better-looking.”
    (referring to AJ & Mariane Pearl)

    -Brad on Angie

    Aww…
    so really what’s the opinion of Ms. C*** Chelsea Mandler?

  23. Lisa S. says:

    “Handler certainly looks petty because she has never meet Angie so she looks like an idiot just for spouting off about a person she has never meet”. You are kidding with that right? I am not trying to me mean here, but that is all this site is. Talking about people we don’t know personally. Fun as it may be…And Love Angelina, you act and write things as though you are best friends with Angelina Jolie. But yes, CH really needs to stop talking. She makes herself look like an ass the moment she opens her mouth. Wow I am feeling very literal today.

  24. Ella says:

    Why should Jen care about or defend Angie?
    I agree, it doesn’t make Jen look like she has moved on… but she owes nothing to that woman.

  25. RHONYC says:

    for the life of me i can’t figure out what happened to chelsea’s looks. she’s used to be so cute on ‘girl’s behaving badly’. 🙁

  26. Bee says:

    @Moreaces, the fact that she would date the douchefactory that is John Mayer not once, but twice as you mentioned, is indicative of Jen’s true character. What kind of person is JA that John “David Duke D*ck” Mayer, Chelsea “I’m a drunken slag” Handler and Joe ” 18 is just a number” Francis are acceptable people to hang out with.

  27. teri says:

    I really get angry when I hear of that woman. The way she can bash on the JP children with racist and hateful rants is beyond humorous.

    Jen grow and pair and if you really have something to say just say it and quit letting that baffoon do your dirty work. I don’t believe there was ever cheating or Jen herself would have said it.

    I would really love to hear what Angelia’s reply would be, but then she let’s baffoons stew in their own self hatred and wouldn’t give them the time of day.

  28. Missy says:

    Jennifer Aniston MUST be on coke if she’s hanging out with this trailers park trash. Sending this horse faced whore out to attack Angelina Jolie is the best she could do?

  29. bellaluna says:

    She just needs to stop. Personally, I think she has the ability to be hysterically funny. But sometimes that same wit turns into “bitter bitchy,” and that is NEVER a good thing.

    As for JA, I don’t harbour any extreme feelings toward her one way or the other. I do like her more than AJ, however.

    Oh, and if we’re judging JA by the company she keeps, what does that say about the Kartrashians? I mean, honestly!

  30. LOVE ANGELINA says:

    Yea Louwho I thought about that. I mean as fans and as people who dislike celebs we kinda do the same thing, we talk about these people without knowing them for real.

    However Entertainment is a business. Angie and Handler are in the same business and business in it self has a certain level of respect among those in the business. You may be competitive with someone in your business you may even be rivals, but you don’t attack them personally. Also in such a manner that other people in the same business get a feel for how YOU do business. For example Eva Longria got in a little trouble a few years ago for wearing a shirt that said “I will have your baby Brad.” Now she got in trouble because SHE didn’t know what really happened in the relationship or if Jen really wanted kids or not. She got in trouble because she should know better than to behave like us, she is in that business, and plus it probably hurt Jen’s feelings. It was a personal attack, even though Eva didn’t mean for it to be and she did say sorry.

    Hence the Aniston and Chandler backlash your witnessing right now because this “stand-up” routine not only wasn’t funny but it was an attack on someone in a very personal way.

  31. chata says:

    I find it funny how the so called women on this site condone infidelity. Anjelina Jolie knowingly went after a married man. She gets no kudos in my book. By the way she looks like a heroin addict. You people on this site have your noses so far up AJ’s a s s that you can even smell the s*i+. Disgusting.

  32. lucy2 says:

    CH is just loving this attention, and people are feeding into it.
    I used to watch her show, mainly for the other comedians she’d have on, but haven’t watched it in months and don’t miss it. She’s just getting too mean.
    Don’t like Jolie, and don’t really care what comedians say about adults who choose life in the public eye, but CH has gone too far saying stuff about kids, and that’s not good.

  33. Marjalane says:

    It’s a shame that the media is jumping on Chelsea Handlers bandwagon. She’s a bitch and a bully. Did I read the interview wrong, or did she actually claim to NOT be nasty or malicious? For “professional journalists” like Couric that can’t wait to be a part of the trashy flavor of the week “star”, I am ashamed. Chelsea Handler is everything they claim to be against.

  34. rentho says:

    I like chelsea handler and i do think she is funny but enough w/the jennifer anniston arse kissing, if brad left jennifer for angelina karma will kick in it doesnt need your help….

  35. ziggy says:

    this dog needs to stop barking, STAT!!

  36. Cheyenne says:

    @chata: There are other websites if you don’t like this one. Check out Female First. They post death wishes on Angie and her children. You’d feel right at home over there.

    @Jackson: “JenJen” recruits her friends to fight her battles for her because she thinks in that way she comes off smelling like a rose. But that rose is smelling more like a stinkweed.

    @RHO: Just be glad her outside isn’t as ugly as her inside yet. Otherwise you’d take one look at her and run screaming into the night.

  37. happygirl says:

    @Louwho & @chata – preach it! Well said IMO.

  38. original kate says:

    “You don’t want to be nasty, and you don’t want to be malicious. But it’s OK—I mean, funny trumps everything in my mind.”

    except chelsea is not funny.

  39. Bunny says:

    Jennifer is annoying. That Diane Sawyer interview when she cried about growing up rich with private schools and drivers…but she was lonely. Tell your problems to some kid in Hati or the Congo right now.

    These are just a bunch of self-absorbed people with no perspective of whats really going on in the world.

  40. Vanilla says:

    who the F is Chelsea Handler?? I mean what does she do for a living (appart from making Aniston look even more pathetic than she already is)

  41. Eve says:

    I agree with everything Kaiser said. Every single word.

    And right now I vow to never again comment on anything this woman says. I won’t give her the time of the day and if any of you guys see me commenting on this ugly, wasted, bitter hag (Handler) ever again, please do me the favor of bitch-slapping me (because that will be well deserved).

  42. Alexa says:

    I don’t know…I say leave Jen Aniston out of this whole debate. Let’s not fill in the blanks with speculation. This is about what Chelsea said, did, and keeps saying and doing. Let’s leave it at that.

  43. e.non says:

    why in the hell is katie couric doing this kind of crap.

  44. Jayna says:

    Poor Jen, six years later and still hanging out at beach resorts drinking and sunning. Jen is 42 and she can do better than Chelsea as a friend. Angie only comes off looking good in this mess and with more depth and meaning to her life, than these two Tequila drinking buddies. Jen needs to distance herself from this mess or tell Chelsea to shut up, if she’s such a good friend, because it only makes Jen look bitter and not moving on. I repeat, Brad would have moved on eventually, anyway, past Jen, Angie or no Angiel

  45. Liana says:

    What makes any of you think that even if Jennifer Aniston asked Chelsea Handler to “stop” she would? This is sport for Handler. She had an affair with a married man to get her show on E and when she signed that contract and he left his wife, she dumped him. She is hardly in a position to be anyone’s moral compass.

  46. Zzzzzzzzzz says:

    Who the hell is Chelsea Handler and why does she think we care about her opinion on anything? She is a rapidly ageing, bitter woman who hosts a trashy and vulgar talkshow on tv. And Angelina is well… Angelina Jolie. She’s sadly mistaken if she thinks any of her crap will have any effect on Angelina whatsoever.

  47. MissyA says:

    Ugh. I vote no more validation for Jen’s circa 2005 pity party.

    Get over it, girl. For your own sake.

  48. Peaches69 says:

    Publicity Stunt!
    Jennifer has movie coming out with Adam Sandler. And I’m sure Chelsea loves the additional ratings.

  49. Kim says:

    Chata -Brad, Angie and Jen says there was no affair while Brad and Jen were still together.But you know better , right. Just curious Do you have the same outrage for Barbara Walters, Oprah Winfrey, Julia Roberts ,Liz Taylor , Audrey Hepburn, Rita Wilson, Courtney Cox , Laura Dern, Joanne Woodward to name a few? Women who definitely had an affair with married man

  50. Marjalane says:

    @liana #45

    Totally agree, Chelsea Handler is like a lion smelling blood when it comes to negative attention. If Jennifer Anniston pisses her off, Chelsea will use her as fodder for the next six months. Was it Maya Angelou that said, “When people show you what they are, believe them.”

  51. Lulu says:

    I don’t get why anyone would want to hang around with someone so mean, spiteful and filled with hate. It makes no sense to me. Chelsea is a bully. She is nastiness personified. The fact that she makes racist comments about the Pitt kids, calling Z a monkey, calling Maddox an eskimo and using a fake Asian voice to mimic him, and calling Shiloh a lesbo, is GROSS. You couldn’t pay me to be around someone that nasty. Yet, Jen befriends her? Obviously there is something off about Jen. Like I said, lovers don’t hang out with haters. Misery loves company. There’s no way Jen is some sweet innocent flower who just happens to hang out with cesspools like Handler and Joe Francis. It’s not believeable.

  52. jackie says:

    I agree with everything you said Kaiser

    And I also think this is the new angle for publicity, since her formula of dating a new guy was getting old.

    It actually gives AJ free publicity too for her movie ….. Hmm….

  53. junipergreen says:

    I don’t think Jennifer Aniston gives two craps about her ex-husband. Only the tabloids do. It’s dumb.

    It does look awful that Jen and Chelsea Handler hang out and then Chelsea goes on that anti-Angelina rant, though. If I were Jen I’d be pissed…it just brings the whole, old mess out into the public talking space again.

  54. Praise St. Angie! says:

    “What makes any of you think that even if Jennifer Aniston asked Chelsea Handler to “stop” she would?”

    Liana, this is exactly what I said about this controversy when it was first posted here.

    add to that Handler’s comment about how “funny trumps everything in my mind”, which is ALSO what I said last time.

    for any comedian, if it’s funny, and works with their audience, it doesn’t matter WHO they’re offending, or WHO they’re bashing, or if one of their friends tell them to stop. if it gets laughs, they’ll use it.

    ah yes…here’s what I had written…

    “seriously, that’s the bottom line for someone who makes their living in comedy…not how a very small part of their act makes one of their friends feel.”

    and I really think that Aniston needs to distance herself from Handler. and, perhaps, she already has. it will be interesting to see how much we see them hanging out together after all this has gone down.

  55. Sigh. says:

    ITA w/ lucy2 on all points —

    A little Handler goes a loooong way, leave the kids be, and I would not “pine” for any of the players involved if they disappeared for a minute.

    Aniston needs to no only lose Handler’s numbers (and block the E! Channel on her tv), she needs to FIRE HER PUBLICIST!!! Hear me out:

    Her image is taking hit after hit, and it is affecting her bottomline. Huvane is not cleaning up these messes quickly or completely. I realize “there’s only such much…,” with her own hand in a lot of this, but whitewash IS a part of his job. Making sh!t look like sirloin, not just fauxmances and such. For example, I believe Cruise’s true, er…quirks didn’t see the light of day until he fired a key staff member, and hired his $cientog sis, and now look…

    I know this may never happen, cuz Aniston obviously does not like change. In appearance, acting roles, vacays, food/liquor, men, etc, but she should really consider it. She’s not a struggling unknown, so she is powerful enough to find another key player to at least undo whatever damage they can at this point.

  56. Cheyenne says:

    Alexa: I don’t know…I say leave Jen Aniston out of this whole debate.
    =====================================

    Tell that to Handler. She was the one who brought her into it.

  57. Sara says:

    Come on people, bullying a insecure high school teen or elementary school kid is TOTALLY different than a comedian talking shit about a HUGE CELEBRITY!! Not even close!
    We don’t know what has or has not been said between the triangle. Perhaps St. Angelina has said some nasty things about Jennifer!!! We don’t know. Perhaps Jennifer TRIED to get pregnant and had miscarriages, we don’t know!!!
    What we DO know is that Angelina acted on her feelings toward a married man and it is fair game that she will always be fair game to be called a man stealer(she has done it before hello Billy Bob). That is life. Angelina seems to be okay with people talking shit about her, she seems to have great confidence and bottom line she has her man, she got what she wanted. IMO Chelsea needs to talk some shit on Brad, after all HE was married NOT Angelina!!!

  58. bite me says:

    jen will never leave huvane, he knows ALL her secrets

  59. teri says:

    Angelina is to busy saving the world to be caught up in such nonsense.

  60. mln76 says:

    @ Sara how do you justify the several nasty jokes about the children? That is clearly bullying no matter how many pics of them are out there.
    @ #55 you are right she should fire Huvane ASAP.

  61. Kim says:

    Well Congrats to Chelsea.She is well known now. My sister had never heard of her until this week.She should send a gift to the fan that put video on youtube.

  62. Sigh. says:

    @ bite me–

    Yeah, I know it’s that, too.

    Only someone with tornado-like strength and gods-like powers could twist this 5/6-year old crap around to her favor AND keep down any “leaks” from Huvane if she were to re-evaluate her personnel, but still…

    She should start out small, like switch light dressings on her daily cobb salad or use a pink umbrella instead of lime green in her mojitos.

    Baby steps.

  63. Cheyenne says:

    @sigh and mln: you guys are preaching to the choir. I’ve been saying for years Aniston should fire Huvane. He’s only succeeded in making her look ludicrous, and she’s too obtuse to see it.

  64. Me1st says:

    bullying…that is the root of most problems isn’t it…my son is bullied at school and because of people like CH the kids that do the bullying think its OK. Its got to stop NOW!!!

  65. nnn says:

    # 58

    Sorry bit WE DO NOT KNOW.

    Again, BBT versions and Laura Dern’s, the one with whom HE had an affair during his fourth marriage contradict itself. Laura Dern IS the original serial HOMEWRECKER in BBT’s couple with his 4th wife.

    According to BBT, he dumped his stalker Dern months before he met Jolie. A stalker who still was after him to get married after all the ‘nice’ and lengthy job she did for him to dump his precvious wife and leave wife and children for HER…hence of course she got even against JoliE when BBT married her just weeks after they first met effortlessly … Laura ‘I won”t be ignore Billy’ Dern got mad and lashed out but not to long, since she set her stalking eyes on another married prey Ben Harper whose wife was pregnant and had no problems THIS time to trap him by getting pregnant too to coercise him not only to divorce (like she did with BBT) but to assure herself that he won’t slip away and marry her !

  66. southerncheerleader says:

    Chessire Handyman “IS” a bully.

    In school, she was probably hated by the popular girls & she sees Angie as one of them. Angie is WORLD-POPULAR.

    In her mind, she’s NOW taking revenge for all of the pain she felt as an outcast.

    And Jen is silly enough to hang w/this woman.

    Don’t wanna be rude, but I can now FULLY understand why Brad wanted a woman of more substance & depth.

    Anyone who’d hang out w/Chessie Man is lacking in sooo many areas.

  67. im awful says:

    seems to me JA could have avoided all these years of people thinking shes bitter by simply stating everytime that someone brings it up, that shes happy BP has found happiness. wouldnt that just shut everyone up? seems so simple.

  68. lulu says:

    Wow! Kaiser! I am still laughing as I picture JA “stroking her hair and wearing a caftan”!

    As far as CH goes, she is raunchy. If JA is sooo sophisticated why is she associating with Handler?

  69. heathen says:

    People telling Jen to grow a pair and distance herself from CH are kidding themselves. This woman, with more money than she can spend & who goes to Cabo 3 to 5x a year, doesn’t bother to buy her own place & instead stays at that scumbag Joe Francis’ Cabo house. That right there, should tell you all you need to know about Jen Aniston. Not to even mention John Mayer & CH.

  70. WhiteNoise says:

    @southerncheerleader
    “Don’t wanna be rude, but I can now FULLY understand why Brad wanted a woman of more substance & depth.”

    Nothing rude about that.

    And since she’s stuck with Huvane for all these years, it seems reasonable to assume she’s happy with the type of media attention she gets. She really seems to be her own worst enemy.

  71. Josephina says:

    Johnny Depp’s Woman:

    Both Jennifer and Chelsea have admitted that they hang out together. Jennifer paid for Chelsea to hang out with her in Mexio two weeks ago over the Thansgiving Holidays. Chelsea has released two statements within the last 3 days, after the Angelina bullying rant, gushing about how much she cherishes Aniston’s friendship. Friends often go to bat for their friends if they think their friend is hurt. Furthermore, she has admitted to not liking Angelina –repeatedly. As recent as today. Aniston and Handler–THEY ARE BUDDIES.

    If anyone is foolish enough to think that Aniston’s jealous thoughts about Angelina and her challenge to accept that Brad is happy WITHOUT HER have not fueled Chelsea’s increasingly inappropriate remarks…

    Well then, I can fly you and your family to DisneyWorld in Orlando, FL for a week at a 5-star hotel for only $78.99 (tax not included.)

    On a more serious note, Aniston needs real friends to help her move on since she cannot do it on her own. Or she needs to go back into therapy.

  72. nnn says:

    #68.

    No sophisticated woman will date a guy who publicly said he only date dumb women. Especially after his details and brags on how he like to shower them with a specific personal fluid. That’s totally Ray J and Karadashian bootey girl BIS.

    No classy woman will find John’s thoughts appealing.

    So no, jen is neither classy, neither sophisticated by any stretch, neither intelligent….even averagely speaking.

    I will also add that the overwhelming people would never be proud to present someone like ChelseA as our friend to family members, friends or even colleagues. She is like dog poop…the stench around her is too foul.

  73. skibunny says:

    Jennifer Aniston is also friends with Oprah. Does that make Oprah guilty by association?

  74. bite me says:

    i don’t remember oprah every saying anything negative about la jolie

    edit: in fact out of all aniston so called friends, handler is the only one to have publicly said anything about la jolie

    Skinny whats the point, that you can’t be responsible for someone else actions

  75. skibunny says:

    @bite me: that’s not the point

  76. skibunny says:

    @bite me: no that’s not the point. It’s that we are so quick to throw JA under the bus for being friends with CH but we dont say she must be a good person for being friends with Oprah. I’m not wording this very well I know…sorry. As well if Oprah is friends with JA and JA is friends with CH does that make Oprah bad too? I’m just trying to figure out people’s reasoning. I dont mean to come off as argumentive. Personally I dont think we are responsible for another’s behaviour.

  77. LittleDeadGirl says:

    Kaiser, these stories are tearing our happy “Celebitchy” family apart … no more … I BEG you! That and I can’t stand looking at Chelsea Handler … if you must post place up hot pictures of Gerard Butler

  78. bite me says:

    skinny, i get where you are coming 😀

  79. SuperSleuth says:

    I cosign skibunny.

  80. rraven says:

    I always wondered why no one notices that Jens so called friendships are with powerful media types that help boost her image. For example Oprah is always there to support her and sing her praises, even Gayle interviewed her on the oscars red carpet when she was with John Mayer and then she has Chelsea who is also making all sorts of shady remarks. Then Jim Carey also dissed Angie on twitter etc. My point is, there is no way I can believ that Jen doesn’t detest Angie. I mean even recently whilst filming horrible bosses, Bill Day was talking about filming with Jen and he said she was surprised that he didn’t know she was married to Brad! So, yeah she hates Angie. Realll bad, but for some reason not Brad.

  81. nnn says:

    Wether you like it or not you are perceived partly through the company you share, especailly when it is closely and visibly and using things that belings to you.

    A company still using and abusing things/facts that belongs to your personal story to lash out on your perceived ennemy makes it even more obvious of a cause and effect correlation and you are tainted even more by this tacit complicity in crime.

    That’s why they have been the french fries and all the joke against the french during the WMD’s controversy leading to the second Irak war. That’s why they are the ‘with us and against us’ englobing and fusionning people, state in the same category when a perception of tacit complicity is set just because they happen to be in the same group or the same entourage.

    That’s why you have persona non grata status, that’s why you have friend state and ennemy ones, that’s why as soon as someone has a nasty reputation and gets flacks enough to be dropped, becoming persona non gratta and becoming cholera and HIV all in one, friends tend to drop like flies too because they don’t want to be perceived as accomplice.

    This is a universal rule applied to anyone. You don’t want the poop of someone closed to you taint you, you distance yourself from that person, especially when the poop is created using your sh*t.

    As a correlation it’s like you gave the bullets for your friend to pull the trigger on your ennemy.

    You are free of your company. You owe it. If your close company is the mafia, a douche, a pittbull anchor with no morality, urinator, a drug dealer, it’s all the same in terms of effect. It defines you, it taints you. You are lumped into the sh*t too.

    You chose your friend, you share that perception : Birds of Feathers stick together especially whenever an implicit correlation is set and widely perceived when one act using YOUR sh*t to strike at your ennemy.

  82. Cheyenne says:

    @Whitenoise: maybe she thinks bad attention is better than no attention at all.

  83. skibunny says:

    @rraven: I dont get your logic

  84. mslewis says:

    Ok, Kaiser, no more stories about this “comedian” loser that nobody knew until she blasted on a true superstar!! Let’s just forget about her and move on.

  85. mslewis says:

    I always wondered why no one notices that Jens so called friendships are with powerful media types. . .
    ——————————————–
    Only Oprah could be called a “powerful media type” certainly not this Handler person.

  86. Kaiser says:

    ZOMG y’all! I just banned the worst friggin’ troll, I just had to say something about it. I know many of the Jen Hens think the Loonies are crazy and weird, and maybe we are (true story), but when a Jen Hen goes off the deep end, it is truly frightening. I end up moderating all-caps rants about how I need to stop “STOP LICKING ANGELINA’S GENITAL WARTS INFESTED ASS”. For reals. Oh, and I got called a “BIPOLAR SLUT” too! Man, it’s a good day.

  87. skibunny says:

    #81: fair enough. Why is it then that if one has 10 good friends and one bad one they are thrown into the same heap as the bad one? Why not judge them on the majority of their friends? Is it because we prefer to think the worst of people instead of the best?

  88. nnn says:

    ” 80 jen was in a merger with Pitt, that catapulted her from tv star to movie star de facto.

    She isn’t as bright or talented to reach the status she set herslef on her own merit…i mean she said she wanted an Oscar 7 years ago, that it was her aim. Now she is in a movie with the likes of Heidi Montag while Jolie is at the top career wise.

    I beleive, the bitterness is more due to the conjonction of two events : Brad leaving her for a woman who keeps on rising in all department of her life and her inability to build either the career she crave for or the couple she wants to and be serene in one or both of them.

    Add to that that she is 42 in an industry where roles become lesser and lesser as you hit the big 4 and you have the perfect groud to breed bitterness.

    Maybe she has the impression that Jolie by being with Brad stole that status she craves for.

    When you are in that type of feelings, at 42 and with nothing else to fall back when the lights of hollywood will shift to younger generations, you’ll end up bitter each and every day and I personally beleive that sonner or later, Jennifer will end up in therapy when she will realiZe that her life has been spilled and that at the end she has nothing.

    She strikes me as a very bitter person, and bitterness eats you inside and makes you uglier and nastier as you ages. You ultimately become a sad individual and its’ not appealing for your entourage.

  89. serena says:

    She’s a bitch.

  90. Catherine says:

    Chelsea is nothing but an idiotic drunk. Jen better rethink this friendship as it makes her look like a classless fool to befriend this mouthy loser. Chelsea’s public rants on Angelina on her “bff’s” behalf make Jen look even more desperate.

  91. Cheyenne says:

    @lu #84: Said the pot to the kettle.

  92. nnn says:

    #88

    Because again, in this case the perceived crime is done using YOUR SH*T, hence as long as you’re not claiming that your sh*t shouldn’t be used by your frined in that specific mission, you are perceived as accomplice.

    The other friends are not visible, they keep quiet. They actually act totally like i have explained…they are deaf and invisible because they don’t want to remind us that they are friends too.

    You on the otherhand are right in the middle of the war because the bullets belongs to you and you don’t claim the abuse made of it by your so called friend. Hence the perception is that you gave them or tacitly agree that it can be used in that specific way. You agree with it, you are lumped together in the same perceived crime and if it stinks then the stench is on you too.

  93. LOVE ANGELINA says:

    Wow Kaiser thats awful. That sorta name calling isn’t ever necessary.

  94. Harper says:

    Look, I agree that it portrays negatively on Jennifer by association. Although I know Chelsea Handler has been bashing Angelina for a long time. Having read her books and seen her stand-up act 2 years ago – this is nothing new from her. Trust me.

    BUT, now that she is friends with Jennifer she needs to back off. Before she was free to voice her opinions about Angelina, but not if she has a “conflict of interest” by being besties with Ms. Aniston.

  95. happygirl says:

    @Kaiser (#87 comment)~ are you serious??? Jeez…that’s ridiculous language! I cannot believe someone said that to you! I would have booted them, too! Unbelievable….

    Edit – @lu (#96) – I think Love Angelina was agreeing that it’s not necessary for someone to call Kaiser those names…not that Kaiser was being rude to the commenters…@Love Angelina & Kaiser…correct me if I’m wrong…

  96. Lori says:

    Aw Kaiser, I don’t think you’re bipolar!

  97. mln76 says:

    @Kaiser yeah we loons are pretty nuts but the Jen trolls are scary people.

  98. Cheyenne says:

    @happygirl: I think you’re right.

    @Lu: Kaiser is never rude to anybody, regardless of what you read on some other web site. But if you think she is, you can always click on that little x at the top right corner of your monitor.

  99. LindaR says:

    Kaiser – I’m happy you moderate the board and don’t allow the trolls. The posts are often more entertaining than the lead story and the arguing is hilarious but I come to this site because I don’t want to read posts from the anonymous crazies that have forgotten to take their meds.

  100. Heavenbound says:

    co-sign with Louwho, on everything said.

  101. Heather says:

    I don’t think Jen or Angelina care about this at all by this point.

  102. skibunny says:

    #89 she was already a big star in a hit series. She didn’t need him. I guess if your logic is correct that makes Brad a pretty bad guy. He was married to her for four years and dated her for two before that. If she was that bad he wouldn’t have stuck around for as long as he did. Seems to me Brad is an opportunist. Sorry but I’m going agree to disagree with your logic.
    Just maybe CH took advantage of a friendship and used it for her own purpose…..$$$$$$ and attention. Afterall in Hollywood “no attention” is your enemy.

  103. Lulu says:

    What a stetch to find an excuse for Jen as usual. Just because Oprah interviewed Jen several times does not mean they are good buddies. I don’t see Oprah being invited to Jen’s tanning sessions in Cabo at Joe Francis’s house. I doubt Oprah would attend. Oprah seems chummy w/a lot of people on camera (Julia Roberts, John Travolta, etc). Doesn’t mean they hang out. Chelsea and Jen hang out. Big difference. Even Chelsea said they email each other, go to bars together, and take vacations together. That means they have something in common and are buddies. And, since this crazy, hate-filled rant came so soon after their spending Thanksgiving together, it seems like they spent their holidays trashing the ex and his baby momma. Good times.

  104. Kendra says:

    Man, Brad Pitt much be something, a nice guy, great in bed. Jennifer is still whinning over this man and wants him back after 6 years. LOL Jen and Chelsea are two losers, who can not hold onto a man.

    I think the two are lovers, why would Chelsea go to such lengths to bash and constantly talk about Angelina.

  105. happygirl says:

    @Cheyenne – thanks 😉 …I was LOL-ing at the “little x at the top of your monitor” part of your comment!

  106. Sigh. says:

    O_o

    That sucks, Kaiser. And is 100% pathetic.

    I don’t agree with your opinion on a lot of things (I mostly just exit the post quietly), but never have I felt rage because of it. That negates any well-thought opinion and becks to a lack of character.

    Personally, I don’t even think these 2 women (JA, AJ) hold nearly as much interest, passion, and/or vitriol for themselves or each other as their fans (who tend to forget they’re complete strangers) do…

  107. Harper says:

    Sometimes I wonder, are Jennifer and Chelsea just sitting back (margarita in hand) laughing their asses off. Probably so.

  108. Kendra says:

    I think it is Angelina and Brad sitting back laughing their asses off. Jen is still in love with Brad and Brad is in love with Angelina.

    Her bully friend , Chelsea is not going to make Brad look Jennifer’s way, he is still with Angelina. LOL Who is Jen and Chelsea with, each other?

  109. skibunny says:

    #103 It’s not an excuse. Jennifer and Oprah really are friends. And yes Oprah has interviewed her too.
    Why do you let your dislike for someone you dont know over rule your reasoning? I’m not even a fan nor do I watch CH show. I dont understand the rational. It’s like reasoning with a teenager. They have an answer for everything even when it doesn’t make sense. Guess I should just drop it. It’s like flogging a dead horse. BUT now that CH has piqued my interest I guess I’ll see if I can find her show on tv. See? This is exactly what she wanted. More interest in her show and it’s all Jen’s fault.

  110. Jenny says:

    Handler is milking this for all it is worth. Her friendship with Anniston did not get an interview with Couric, her nasty words about Jolie did. Does that not say something about who is the bigger star? By being silent, Anniston is playing her usual victim– Poor, poor pitiful me, let my friends do the dirty work”.

  111. mln76 says:

    @skibunny are Oprah and Jen really still friends? I haven’t seen her on the show since the whole uncool drama and she’s promoted several films since then. Maybe she will be on Oprah for her next promotion but I haven’t heard of them hanging out lately.

    BTW Oprah never name called ANYONE and told Brad he seemed much happier now with his new family then before.

  112. Nacy says:

    All I can say is that 1. Chelsea is an ugly talentless drunken racist bully bitch and 2. Jennifer need to watch her back she might think its funny now but once Chelsea is done using her all hell is going to break loose every little thing Jen ever told her Chelsea going to uses against her to try and make herself become more famous.

  113. skibunny says:

    @mln76:They are probably still friends but I dont know how often they see each other. It did sound pretty cosy at one point.

  114. skibunny says:

    Well who really knows the truth. All I know for sure is “love me or hate me” I’d like any one of their bank accounts for my own.

  115. Liana says:

    Oh, and I got called a “BIPOLAR SLUT” too! Man, it’s a good day.
    ***********

    It’s not really a day until you’ve had coffee and been called a bipolar slut.

  116. Marjalane says:

    Wow. I always thought it was total urban legend that there were actual Brangaloonies and Jenhens; Kind of like Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny.

  117. Lulu says:

    “Why do you let your dislike for someone you dont know over rule your reasoning?”
    ______________________________
    What a ridiculous statement. One might ask you the same. Why do you let your obvious like for someone overrule your reasoning? I’m sorry I don’t buy into the fairy tale. She hangs out with Chelsea, and I don’t see her suntanning in Cabo with Oprah. Do you not acknowlege anything that disagrees with your pre-set determination that Jen is always innocent? Ridiculous.

    I personally think Jen really likes the association with the triangle. An example: she invited People magazine to her Cabo party, they came and took pics, wrote a nice article, and then the cover read, “Jen: 5 Years after Brad, Fun Flirty and 41!” That’s a fact. If she didn’t like this association with her ex, then why does she promote it? And, her hanging out with a woman whose act is to trash her ex’s girlfriend, and their kids, is another example. If she didn’t like Chelsea, then why would she by such good buddies with her? Lovers don’t hang out with haters. I don’t look for excuses for this woman, I just look at her actions. Of course, in your eyes that makes me unreasonable, because I don’t see things the way you do. I’m sorry I don’t see things your way. 🙂

    I don’t see how people can make excuses for Chelsea and her friend, Jen. If Jen had any values whatsoever, she wouldn’t hang out with someone who calls others the c-word, or makes racist, homophobic statements about little kids. Angelina may not be a saint or whatever, but she’s still a person, and her kids don’t deserve to be bullied like that. I don’t think that behavior is acceptable and I have a right to say so.

  118. Harper says:

    I don’t think Jennifer gives a rats ass about Brad anymore. It’s all media-spun tabloid games. I think she is laughing, all the way to the bank.

  119. rraven says:

    @ skibunny: what I was trying to say in my post was there are many clues to the fact that a)jen hates angie b) some of her friends have access to large audiences and have bashed Angie c) as recently as this year she still identified strongly as Brads ex-wife and was surprised her co star had no idea they had been married. Anyway, I’ve lost interest now, hope this made some sense.

  120. california angel says:

    I answer phones all day and some of the stuff people say when they’re not saying it to your face is ridiculous. For example; taking a message for Oliver Klausoff…oh man. what a life. I feel ya Kaiser.

  121. Runs with Scissors says:

    @Skibunny :”Why do you let your dislike for someone you dont know over rule your reasoning? I’m not even a fan nor do I watch CH show. I dont understand the rational. It’s like reasoning with a teenager. They have an answer for everything even when it doesn’t make sense. Guess I should just drop it. It’s like flogging a dead horse…”

    For the love of God, read your OWN post and then apply it to yourself. You don’t see Oprah on the beach with Aniston, sipping mohitos with her ass in the air. Interviewing someone does not make them friends. Oprah wouldn’t say a word about Sara Palin the other day either, because she wants to be able to interview her later and not burn bridges. Doesn’t make them friends.

    People never allow Aniston to be a grown woman, I just don’t get it. Nothing is EVER her fault.

    If someone you knew went out and issued hate-filled, racist, homophobic attacks on CHILDREN, would you then go and plop yourself down on their interview couch with a big grin on your face?

    Would you then invite that person repeatedly on intimate vacations with you?? Well, not unless you AGREE with them and their tactics and like what they’re saying.

    Otherwise, you’d refuse to appear and would distance yourself from them, just like you would avoid (hopefully) any other racist homophobe who attacks children.

    But of course, none of this reflects on poor pitiful Jen, she’s the victim here again, as usual.

    BTW, this isn’t aimed at you Skibunny, just the bit about Oprah.

  122. nnn says:

    #118

    I beleive they ALL laugh their way to the bank and i also beleive Jennifer doesn’t laugh AT ALL when she see her ex and his new woman having love and professional success above hers.

    It’s not always about money, it can be about simple ego related competition in terms of upstaging the other.

    Objectively it is clear that jennifer 5 years after Brad has lost some of her benefits and credebility in star value (in personal and professional areas) hasn’t reached the goals (on a personal and professional level) she publicly set herself whereas the one she perceived as her ennemy has gained in all of those departments, becoming bigger, more powerful and successful in multiple department while being younger, which statistically gives her even more years to still keep on rising and enjoying her multiple successes.

    Rich people still compete against each other and still relate to each other in terms if losses and gains, failures and wins in both personal and professional areas.

    After all they are loaded for life, the battle is somewhere else…wether legacy before becoming hasbeens, personal and professional accomplishment, you name it.

  123. lisa says:

    Well it’s a good thing that Aniston does not give a rat’s as* about Brad. I’m sure the feeling is mutual.

    I don’t get the headlines that Handler is at WAR with Angelina.

    How do you go to war with someone how is not on the same playing field as you.

    I don’t see Angelina making a comment to Handler. I don’t see her giving Handler the war of words that she obviously wants.

    So when ONE person is in a battle how does that become a war.

    Angelina is headed to parts unknown until she and Brad hit the RC next week. Handler needs Angie for attention. It is not the other way around.

    And when you think of all the crap the tabloids have printed and Angelina has not responded to those stories. Why in the world would she talk about Handler.

    Handler is a NONE PERSON in Angelina’s life.

    but it is funny that Angie seems to occupy so much thought in Handler’s.. strange when you are screaming you want to avoid someone.

    LOL

  124. Meanchick says:

    You know, there are some women who just have a problem with other women go after another woman’s guy. It’s just wrong. Brad is also to blame, but for women, we think it’s the lowest thing ever for a women to do that to another woman. Angelina has to live with that, so whatever.

  125. Kim says:

    You know damn well Anniston LOVES that Chelsea made those comments.

    At least Angelina isnt being a high school mean girl like Jenn & Chelsea. Its just immature and lame.

  126. MrsOdie2 says:

    Chelsea Handler is a New York Times best selling author three times over. Just because the Brangeloonies are only now hearing about her, doesn’t mean she came out of nowhere. She’s been on various tv shows for over seven years. Her stand up shows sell out. I think she’s funny and always have. Yes, she definitely looks older than her admitted age of 35, but she admits to being a heavy drinker, so that’s what will happen.

  127. writer01 says:

    I am a comedian and I can testify to what a few comments on here have noted (notably, ‘St. Angie’): if we perceive a joke is funny, it will get used and used. Joke writing is hard. Really really hard. Now, clearly many of you think these jokes CH told are unfunny. I agree but only because I think the jokes are irrelevant and probably years old. Still, anyone who has a mature relationship/friendship with a comic knows that asking them to self-edit their act is not going to happen. Louis CK and Chris Rock have all done nasty jokes about their wives–You would think the spouse of a comic certainly has more authority to request they take jokes out that hurt their feelings or make them look bad. But a FRIEND? Good lord, no… Perhaps Jen realizes that CH will do the jokes regardless, and either doesn’t care, is secretly pleased, or totally mortified.

  128. Runs with Scissors says:

    @Writer, these are jokes about CHILDREN totally different.
    If Aniston was mortified by these attacks on children, she wouldn’t be going on intimate vacations with Handler.
    She loves it.

  129. nnn says:

    Chelsea Handler can sell any book she want, she is still A CHILD ABUSER for insulting a child being a monkey, a lezbo and ezkimo. She is still a vulgar woman praised for her vulgarity. Crass is her job.

    The fact that this kind of individual is celebrated in teh US as she isn’t known elsewhere as one of the best US comedy representative just show the bankrupcy of this culture and the rise of the trash culture with new boundaries to immarility.

    She is no better than Karadashian or Hilton, both wordly known. At least those too don’t make a business of trashing children left and right so that some adults can have a good laugh and proudly boost about their best representatives and the kind of comedy that make them laugh consisting in putting some children into the public arena to stone them with racist and sexual connotations in the pretense of comedy just to legitimize that over the top tendency…

  130. Marie says:

    #Runs with Scissors: This! And, I would ignore skibunny. She is the person who said I have a “low IQ” b/c I don’t see Jennifer Aniston the way she does.(I think Aniston is manipulative.) Apparently, she gets REALLY mad when people don’t see Jen like she does, resorting to name-calling and saying you must have a low IQ or the reasoning skills of a “teenager.” I can’t imagine being on the internet and thinking YOUR opinion is the RIGHT one, and everyone else is dumb and wrong. But she is one of those people.

  131. skibunny says:

    @ Runs with Scissors: Well maybe they haven’t gone to the beach together but they have stayed over at each others house and partied together on occasion. Oprah showed it on her program plus she said she was a personal friend of Jennifer’s. That’s where I’m getting my info…out of the horse’s mouth not a tabloid or pictures. All I’m saying is it’s “my opinion” that you are not responsible for another’s actions. Why blame Jennifer Aniston for CH’s mouth just because you don’t like JA? How do we know she’s not royally pissed? Isn’t someone innocent until proven guilty? Where’s the proof that she approves? I’m going on principle alone not in defense of JA. This could be about anyone.

    @Marie: are you on crack? Lol Why are you saying this?

  132. Cruisin_Through says:

    Handler is a pig and a trainwreck waiting to happen! Aniston needs to pick her friends more carefully.

  133. writer01 says:

    Regardless of how you think it SHOULD be, in the culture of stand up comedy, NO jokes are off-limits. None. Take the popular Seinfeld series on NBC. Do you remember the Seinfeld episode with the ugly baby? Kids and babies are definitely not off limits, that episode is considered a classic and it’s 10 years old! Comedians always deal with outside pressure to be more considerate of one group or others feelings. This might seem like a good idea to you, but that idea is totally rejected in stand up comedy. Having to worry about what others think beyond whether they will laugh is not conducive to joke writing. If you don’t like what one is saying, leave the club, don’t buy their records or support them. Last time I checked we still have Free Speech in all it’s obnoxious glory.

  134. nnn says:

    Yes nothing is off limit but comedians put themselves their own limits and Chelsea going after THOSE type of targets show how coward she is.

    I have much more respect for comedian or real people making a stand who will go off limits with a religion, a child molestor, a dictator, a criminal, a politician…but we all know that those poeple like Chelsea will sh*t in their pants doing that. Its easier to make money on yunger targets or specific women.

    This is not comedy, this is exploitation

    It’s much more easier to go after specific children because hey, freedom of speech in the US is there to protect you because i know for a fact that in at least two other european countries she would have been fired and fined, that’s what has happend a few years ago as a radio anchor was describing Venus Williams playing in Antwerp as being like the one of an intelligent MONKEy. He was fired less than 12 yhours later and an organization SOS racism attack him on court the day after. He was fined.

    I also know that a french politician was stipped from his political elegibility for three years just by insisting that gaz chambers didn’t exist and lately a comedian making a jewish jokes also fined and held as persona grata seeing his shiows canceles.

    So that’s probably why Chelsea Pittbull will remained successful in the US only for her over the top comedic stunt and her rage passed as comedy..

  135. Angie says:

    @ella #24 mte

  136. Cheyenne says:

    @writer01: Did that ugly baby have a name or was Seinfeld just talking about ugly babies in general? Handler called Maddox an eskimo, she called Z a monkey and she referred to Shiloh as a lesbo. These children are 9, 5 and 4 years old. If targeting specific children is not off limits it damn well should be. Somebody needs to go up to Handler and slap the teeth out of her mouth.

    @Harper: I don’t think Aniston want Brad back. I don’t think there was much love left between them by the time they split up. The marriage had been going down the tubes for years. What I think bothered her a great deal was seeing him move on so quickly, before she was ready to let him move on. In that respect she’s like a bajillion other women whose ex-husbands found a new relationship before they did.

  137. Nacy says:

    writer01 calling a baby or kid ugly is one thing calling a kid a monkey especially a black kid a monkey is a raises slur and not funny, only someone that is racist would find something like that amusing. Bullies think what they’re doing is make jokes but to the people who comet suicide because of it didn’t find it funny.

  138. Marie says:

    skibunny:
    December 1st, 2010 at 3:59 pm

    Maria and Cherise: What you just wrote tells me something about yourselves. Low IQ and no class.
    ___________________________________

    You obviously resort to name-calling if a poster has an opinion different from yours on Jennifer Aniston. And, you were criticizing people for saying mean things about Jen’s hair, calling them haters, etc. You said we shouldn’t make fun of women in general. But here you are defending Jen’s association with the vile Chelsea Handler? Unbelieveably hypocritical.

    And, birds of a feather flock together. Jen obviously has no problems with her, since Chelsea has been doing her stand-up hate-fest against Angelina for awhile. And, Jen and Chelsea have been seen together at bars and hanging out for awhile. It’s clear she either approves or is egging her on. If she was so nice why be around someone so nasty? Just my opinion.

  139. Marie says:

    @Cheyenne. Yeah, it take an amazing amount of talent to call a woman a “F’in C*nt.” Now that’s comedic ingenuity!

    Chelsea only admitted she hated Angelina. Her spewage against Angelina and the kids was an example of PURE hate, and then trying to cover it up as comedy. Sure, she has the freedom of speech to do that. But, I have the freedom to say that she’s an ugly person. And that her only talent has been using her crotch to get the head of E! to leave his wife for her, and sign her contract. This is the woman who has a sex tape out. The fact that she would criticize anyone, is like Paris Hilton calling Kim Kardashian trashy. It makes you think Chelsea is delusional.

    I think Angelina comes out smelling like a rose. Jen and Chelsea look like bitter, mean-girls who are obsessed with Angelina and want to destroy her. They both look really bad right now, and deservedly so.

  140. writer01 says:

    Now this is really splitting hairs… no one is going to win any awards for compassion on this thread!

    “Did that ugly baby have a name or was Seinfeld just talking about ugly babies in general?”
    (so long as the ugly baby has no name and remains unnamed, all is right in the world)

    “calling a baby or kid ugly is one thing calling a kid a monkey especially a black kid a monkey is a raises slur and not funny”
    (okay, so now calling a kid/baby ugly IS okay, just so long as no further description comes. isn’t calling a kid a monkey another way of calling him ugly? why is one okay to you but not the other?)

    if you guys think Free Speech should be regulated, who gets to decide what is ‘okay’? the person who said calling a baby ugly so long as they remain nameless is ‘okay’? the person who says calling a baby ugly is okay but not attaching further obnoxious description–that is acceptable? do you think this fun website would get to run whatever stories it liked if the Free Speech police were breathing down it’s neck?

  141. alexandra says:

    I like Chelsea I like Angelina and Aniston must be a pain in the ass to get along with men. Also it is true that only bitches can’t have female friends. A total conundrum on Angelina ’cause she does good will work but can’t have female friends. Even though she is drop dead gorgeous shows her insecurities by that statement of been unable to friend women. Chelsea is raunchy and that is the reason she is popular. Because everyone tries to be so propper and is just a facade. So good for Chelsea. For Aniston I can’t read her.

  142. redlips says:

    I’m a little late to this party……

    Skibunny – Ditto!

    Writer01 – Thank you, for all the insightful information!Makes perfect sense to me….I don’t think the loon’s can except it due to the fact that CH was talking about the Saint’s children, and that is TOTALLY off limits, you see.

  143. slymm27 says:

    i do believe jenifer aniston is sleeping with this woman…..

  144. Kendra says:

    LOL, I just read that they asked 50 cents who would he like to be and his reply was Brad Pitt, so he could sleep with Angelina.

    No wonder Chelsea Handler hates Angelina, even 50 cents wants her.

    Jennifer has finally found her soulmate, I hope she and Chelsea will be very happy together.

  145. smartie says:

    Belittling Jen, Jolie or CH (for that matter) is no better than CH being crude. Why resort to insults and ugly name calling to make a point if you are so disgusted by it?

  146. latam says:

    “You don’t want to be nasty, and you don’t want to be malicious.”

    Right…….difference between comedy and venom people. Her “joke” was venom and the fact that she has repeatedly insulted Angelina out of the blue in interviews etc shows shes got a problem. What was the purpose of bringing her up in Rolling Stone?

    I remember seeing taraji henson on her show, the woman was digging for gossip then backed down when taraji only had nice things to say.

  147. waq says:

    cod:
    December 9th, 2010 at 11:09 pm

    If someone stole my husband I WOULD HATE HER FOR THE REST OF MY LIFE.

    Or you could actually come to terms with the fact that your husband left you of his own free will.

  148. bambam says:

    I wish all these “poor Jennifer” and “hate Angelina” thing would be over. It’s almost 2011, it’s time to move on. Besides I’d rather judge people not for what they were but for what they’ve become.

  149. Josephina says:

    #140–

    Well, alrighty then. Stay as a child and watch the world grow and leave you behind. You can have your immaturity and your resentment to keep you warm and be your best friend.

  150. Lisa S says:

    Wow and Wow

  151. Ella says:

    I don’t get it–if someone steals your husband, you should be like “Well, that’s swell–good luck!”
    That’s not normal. It’s normal to be upset with it, as long as it’s not all consuming—it’s normal not to like the people (especially the other party) involved.

  152. Bad association says:

    Not a good thing when someone gross and vulgar speaks highly of you. How could Aniston be closely associated with someone so crass?

  153. toni says:

    Wow!! Why do we care about Jennifer, Brad and Angelina. We don’t even know them. Paul Newman left his first wife and married Joanne. Eddie Fisher left Debbie Reynolds and married Elisabeth Taylor. Divorce is very common in hollywood. People get divorce everyday in this country. There’s something deeper going on with the public fascination with this couple. JMO

  154. kimmie says:

    Whatever – like Chelsea should talk. If I recall correctly, she was boning a big wig at E! and instantly got her own show. Hmmmm…talk about tit for tat. Put a sock in it Chelsea, you should be the last one to talk.

  155. Steal husband? says:

    Ella, You are just assuming that AJ “stole” her husband. You don’t know what happened in their marriage. It takes the husband and wife to end the marriage. Same type of thing happened to me, but I don’t hold a grudge. If the marriage was supposed to stay together, then it would have. Obviously, the marriage was over. I don’t get why women want to hold on the pain… let it go, for heaven’s sake.

  156. anom says:

    For the “husband stealer” women who do not wish to face reality, Aniston (YOU) don’t want to face the fact that Aniston (YOU)was 50% responsible in the demise of Her (YOUR) marriage or relationship. Aniston (YOU) took the relationship for granted and neglected it. Brad (YOUR HUSBAND)fell out of love with Aniston (YOU) and fell IN LOVE WITH Angelina (ANOTHER WOMAN). And Brad(YOUR HUSBAND) left Aniston (YOU) and is happily living his life. While Aniston (YOU) are still blaming, bitter and ALONE.

  157. southerncheerleader says:

    association …

    It’s simple: Birds of a feather, flock together.

    Jen & the Chess-man = SAME in thought about all.

    You can best believe JENNY FROM THE BORING feels that way about Angie’s kids, also.

    Jen is cheering on the Chess-man; believe it.

    You may as well call Chess her spokeswoman.

  158. southerncheerleader says:

    writer01

    If you ever have kids, let’s see how you feel when they start calling your kid ugly or fat or goofy or stinky…Or whatever it is.

    OR ….Let’s see how you feel when it happens to your nieces or nephews.

    When they throw rocks or spit at them & tell the principal, IT WAS JUST A JOKE, WE WERE JUST KIDDING.

    How are you gonna feel then?

  159. yadicakes says:

    I don’t like my so called “friends” speaking on my behalf. I have a very big mouth to speak my mind and I would assume Jen also feels the same way.

    Chandler is probably using her story to gain publicity ala Kathy Griffin style. I guess you really can’t trust anyone when you are famous.

    As for Angie, I’m sure she ain’t losing any sleep over this. Chandler is more of like a dirty old chewed up piece of gum on the bottom of her Jimmy Choos

  160. Sakyiwaa says:

    i just can’t help but marvel at this EXTREMELY DELAYED reaction to Brangelina. why didn’t the shit hit the fan WHEN it effing happened?

  161. janie says:

    look what happens when Handler bashes on AJ. laughing all the way to the bank.
    i’m not on team aniston or jolie, but jolie has some of the best publicity out there. have you all forgotten she was carrying around a vile of blood? that is just creepy. kind of hard to take the hard core mother role seriously. but her kids are cute.

  162. Solveig says:

    Wow, 162 comment about 2 overexposed and mediocre actresses and an unfunny comedian.

  163. wonderful says:

    smartie: “Belittling Jen, Jolie or CH (for that matter) is no better than CH being crude. Why resort to insults and ugly name calling to make a point if you are so disgusted by it?”
    ThankyouThankyouTHANKYOUUUUUUUU

  164. Sakyiwaa says:

    what exactly is a “track record”?

  165. skibunny says:

    Marie: sorry if the truth hurts. Your exhibit of juvenile behaviour has just proven my point. Thanks! I rest my case.

    I dont come on here to get into a fight with someone. If that’s your purpose then go pick on someone else because I’m not going to stoop to that level.

  166. Lady D says:

    @ Lisa S…… pretty much covers it.

  167. Camille says:

    I didn’t want to comment on this thread but have to say @skibunny: chill. Marie didn’t say anything nasty to you, she said nothing for you to get upset over. All is OK in the world. 😀

    This thread is out of control.

  168. Cheyenne says:

    @writer01: If you can’t see the difference between talking about an “ugly baby” who remains unidentified, and spewing vicious comments about a specific child, then it wouldn’t surprise me a bit if one day you find yourself the respondent in a slander suit. If you ever referred to my kid by his name as a “monkey” or whatever, I’d haul your ass into court so fast you wouldn’t know which end was up.

  169. Lulu says:

    I agree Camille. Marie didn’t call people names. She just pointed out some hypocrisy. I don’t get skibunny. She calls people out as haters whenever people say anything about Jennifer Aniston. But, now she’s sticking up for Aniston who hangs out with the absolute WORST hater of them all? Makes no sense whatsoever??? And getting angry at people, saying they have a low IQ is not NICE, skibunny. You say that other people have the reasoning skills of teenagers? Look in the mirror, lady.

  170. skibunny says:

    Camille & Lulu?: you are making a judgement based on a comment that has been copied and pasted from another thread and it had nothing to do with Jennifer Aniston. Dont you people read before you spout off? This is so creepy.

  171. Kendra says:

    Skibunny, it has everything to do with Jennifer Aniston. She is still in love with Brad, she still wants Brad. Jennifer is a bitter hag, who is jealous that Angelina has the life, that she has said that she wanted.

    Jennifer has said that she wanted it all, ( a partner, kids, and a career) that she considered that a full life.

    Angelina has all of that, Jennifer and Chelsea do not.

    Getting Chelsea to attack Angelina is not going to help her achieve it either. It only make her look more pathetic, bitter and lonely than she is.

  172. Hakura says:

    This is so played out…

    I truly believe that Jen may have simply been trying to wait for this backlash (of Chelsea’s rant) to dissipate on it’s own.

    If she’d immediately released a statement in response, it could have come off as her being ‘defensive’. Which would probably have made her look even worse. It seems like she was caught between a rock and a hard place, ‘damned if you do, damned if you don’t’, by Chelsea.

    Chelsea is entirely responsible for this mess, and should be the only one receiving the backlash. There’s nothing to indicate that Jen said or did anything negative in regards to AJ & Brad. I just don’t understand why so many people are crucifying her for something *she* didn’t say.

    And as for everyone talking about Jen still being in love with Brad… When did YOU talk to Jen personally? A marriage ended, she obviously loved him, and likely always will to an extent. But making all these assumptions is just ridiculous.

  173. Lulu says:

    @skibunny. That’s not true–try again. The thread was on Jennifer Aniston + her hair, and Chelsea telling her to cut it. Some people made comments that Jen’s hairstyle was as boring as she is etc., and then you called them haters. And when posters disagreed, you said they had low IQs. What’s creepy is your need for everyone to see Jennifer Aniston like you do, and then as Marie said, calling them dumb if they don’t. You are arguing that people are being mean to Jen, while you are being nasty yourself. Rather hypocritical. 🙁

    @Hakura. While I agree Chelsea is to blame. But, as she said, she’s been mean to Angelina for awhile. Jen knows Chelsea is really nasty, using her own life as cannon fodder against her ex’s baby momma. So, why hang around someone so nasty? What does she get out of it?

    And what really got me, at one point, Chelsea said that Brad needed to run back to Aniston. Maybe, that’s why Brad is never attacked, because someone is holding onto the past and that Brad will wake up and come to his senses??I don’t know, but the whole thing is weird. I used to watch Handler when she first came on the air. She wasn’t this nasty to Angelina. She said Angie was freaky, etc. but they were not personal attacks and there was no name-calling. Handler’s excuses don’t ring true. Once she got to know Aniston, the vitriol became over-the-top and excessive. It makes you think she got personal information from Aniston herself and has picked sides. And that’s what many people have noticed about this recent attack. It’s not even comedy–it’s a personal, hate-filled rant.

  174. The Hamm is My Dream Man says:

    Jennifer doesn’t owe Angelina a damn thing.

    That is the crux of this whole stupid debacle. You loonies thinking that Angelina doesn’t deserve the rude jokes being hurled at her. Angelina isn’t any different than any other celebrity. She doesn’t deserve any more respect, she doesn’t deserve any more reverence and she damn sure isn’t too special to get picked on by some second tier comedian.

    And Jennifer is well within her rights to dislike someone else no matter who they are. If she doesn’t like Angelina, so the eff what? She doesn’t owe her a gotdamn thing.

  175. nnn says:

    Right jennifer and Jolie don’t owe a damn thing to each other.

    You loonies who think that the whole critics is for jennifer to owe something to Jolie are totally delusional.

    The point is, Jennifer just OWE IT TO HERSELF, her reputation, the image she has carefully crafted and that is part of her bottom business to distance herself from her new bff critics perceived on her behalf. Even if you don’t like someone you just don’t go insult her publicly.

    Do that in reality and look what will happened : it makes the one spouting the insults BAD, uneducated, unprofessional and gross.

    This has actually lifted Jolie’s star and tainted Jennifer’s. Again, just like and even much more than the r-word, it has just tainted even more Jen’s image, not Jolie’s.

    So you fans of hers who don’t grasp that whole point and that the general conscensus that is that it makes HER looks worst than before should instead be the first ones to advocate for her to distance herself asap, regain her fabricated ‘virginity’ if you trully were her fans.

    Not to stick to her guns and contribute to her own suicide by her own friend’s sword.

  176. Kendra says:

    Bottom line, Jennifer has not moved on. I had thought this for awhile, with the little comments Jennifer let slip.

    Now I know for sure, JENNIFER HAS NOT MOVED ON. She is still in love with a man, who moved on 6 years ago and has 6 babies with his partner.

    It would be funny, if not so pathetic and sad.

  177. Cheyenne says:

    @Kendra: She is not still in love with him and I doubt she ever was. But she is still hurting about being dumped. What makes it worse is seeing them both with thriving careers and happy with each other and their children, while her career is going down the tubes and guys keep leaving her. If she was happily settled with somebody I don’t think she would ever mention Brad’s name again.

  178. Cheyenne says:

    @Hamm: As usual, you totally missed the point.

    Aniston doesn’t owe Jolie anything. She owes it to HERSELF and to her own self-respect to disassociate herself from Handler pronto. If she can’t see the damage Handler has done to her by the rants she has made about Jolie, she’s an idiot. Handler has made her look like a pathetic loser who keeps obsessing over a man who left her for another woman six years after the event. As long as she plays buddy-buddies with Handler, she makes it look as if Handler is her mouthpiece fighting her battles for her. And if that is actually the case, then that says all about both of them that needs to be said.

  179. Lulu says:

    “You loonies . . . ”

    Name-calling is ALWAYS the sign of someone who has no point and has returned back to the 5th grade. Congrats! 🙂

    Of course, Jen doesn’t owe Jolie anything. That was never the point. People are noticing her hypocrisy and how she hangs out with people who are the exact opposite of the sweetheart act she promotes in the press. She herself has pleaded with the media to not make her a part of this “insane Bermuda triangle,” and talked about how the “tabloids have ruined her life” on Oprah. HER WORDS. So, on one hand she cries about the media intrusion in her life, tyring to get sympathy. On the other hand, she hangs out with someone who uses her own life to stir up attention and tabloid drama, and has been doing this hate-act for awhile? Makes no sense. Aniston either endorses it, or she’s using it for the press.

  180. The Hamm is My Dream Man says:

    You’ve both missed my point which is, again, it isn’t Jennifer’s responsibility to shut her friends up.

    And quite frankly, it seems the only people who think she’s behind Chelsea Handler’s recent idiocy are the loons. No one else beside the people who have a predilection toward blind hatred of Aniston are saying that she must be the one behind the jokes.

    She doesn’t owe it to herself and her “self-respect” to shut her friend up. Chances are she doesn’t like Angelina. Chances are she can’t let go of Angelina being with her ex-husband. Some people find it understandable, others find it pathetic and loserly. To each his own. We don’t know her personally so its all silly conjecture.

    Lulu: Brangeloonie is a well accepted term for folks who are on the Brangelina “side” of the triangle. “Loonie” is a shortened version of this term. It’s not namecalling, try as you might to make me seem like a jerk.

    I don’t think anyone thinks of her as a “sweetheart” anymore. She’s way past that time-she’s 40-something. It’s pretty clear that she likes to get drunk, party in Cabo San Lucas and make crap romantic comedies. Only you and the other loonies seem to be perturbed by this.

  181. Cheyenne says:

    @Hamm: She can get drunk as a skunk for all I care but she should choose her drinking buddies more carefully, know what I’m saying? As long as she chooses to associate with a festering bitch like Handler, she will look like a pathetic loser who recruits other people to fight her battles for her. And there is no way she can get around that.

  182. skibunny says:

    There’s a difference between calling someone a name and calling them on their behaviour.
    67.skibunny:
    December 1st, 2010 at 12:45 am I used to volunteer in a cancer centre and for most of the patients(men and women)losing their hair was tramatic. Almost worse than the diagnosis itself. The nastiness towards this woman is disgusting
    For the record this was my original post. Then I was told I need help among other things. Where exactly is the name calling?

  183. Solveig says:

    I’m a friend with a priest but that doesn’t make me a nun.
    And I’m an atheist, by the way.

  184. skibunny says:

    Solveig: excellent!!!

  185. Micki says:

    AJ and JA may deserve all the nasty jokes they get, but to make jokes about children(being ugly or not) is just low class and I can’t laugh about it.I see my son in such situation and God help the joking A-hole because he’s not going to make it to court.

  186. anon says:

    @Micki: Exactly, not understanding why CH fans and defenders don’t get that. You can say what you will about adults. The children should be left out of it. The mocking of the children and the saying the “R” word is what the real backlash will about for JA and CH. Most people don’t care about adult on adult bashing but consider the bashing of the (JP, or any other celeb) children out of line and it is, no matter who is doing it. Leave children out of it.

  187. Sami says:

    Look at all the excuses and denials by the Loonifers about their idol Jennifer. Aniston is a conniving, spiteful b1tch and she has been in on this from the very beginning, ever since her conniving publicist Huvane started repping Handler. Anyone that isn’t Anistoned and brainwashed by the Loonifer coolaid can see this. Only the loons (Loonifers) can’t, and refuse, to see it. When most people spend Thanksgiving with their families, Aniston is instead spending it with Handler, as a BUSINESS vacation where they plotted and planned their latest attack against Angelina. And like all of Aniston’s slurs against Angelina or boyfriend scandals, this of course came out right when The Tourist hit the cinemas. The Loonifers may be brainwashed and can’t see Aniston for the toxic scheming b1tch that she is, but thank goodness I and many others can. I always knew that proof would come out somehow, some day, about how Aniston is a conniving evil b!tch and as far from her FAKE ‘sweetheart’ persona as possible. As someone on another forum recently said, this is Aniston’s Waterloo. I am happy that people are FINALLY waking up and seeing Aniston for what she really is. A wolf in sheeps clothing. A slimy, smarmy, conniving scheming spiteful b1tch. Until Aniston leaves Angelina ALONE and stops this vendetta against her, she will always be lonely and bitter. Karma has rewarded Angelina. She is going from success to success, from strength to strength. Personally, professionally. Yet Aniston’s career is flopping, she can’t keep a man longer than Huvane can afford to pay them for, instead of spending Thanksgiving and other vacations with her FAMILY, her half-BROTHER, her parents, she spends it with Chelsea Handler plotting and scheming. This woman is close to NO ONE, except Huvane and Courteney, the latter which she followed around her and her husband around everywhere like a third wheel. Aniston doesn’t get that karma won’t reward her for being an evil malicious b1tch. I’m just glad that finally, after 6 years, more people as I predicted, are starting to loosen the wool from their eyes, sobering up from the coolaid and seeing Aniston for what she is.

  188. andy says:

    what i can’t understand is why has jennifer not gotten over brad, or over hating angelina, it is so obvious what jennifer and this clown chelsea were doing on that vacation, i can see it so clear, Jennifer crying to Clown face, that bitch took my man, Clown face don’t worry that bitch is gonna pay for what she did to you. Clown face, i will make a fool of her, and her stupid kids, everyone will hate that bitch, and no one will go see her dumb movies and will feel sorry for you and go and see all your movies. Cause Jen you are the girl next door, they all love you, everyone will blame it on me and I will blame it on the brother. High Five Jen from the Clown face.