OK! Magazine runs Aniston & Mayer’s “wedding of the year” (update: denied)

OK! Magazine claims to have an exclusive story with all the details of Jennifer Aniston’s planned backyard wedding to John Mayer. They claim it will be the “WEDDING of the YEAR” in that bright yellow font the tabloids love to use. Judging from the quotes that are included in the teaser article posted on OK!’s site, it’s probably one of those stories that is entirely based on “insiders” and “sources,” and it sounds like it will sell a lot of copies even if it strikes me as completely fabricated at first glance:

In the coming months, Jennifer Aniston will be celebrating two major milestones in her life: turning 40, and marrying the new love of her life, John Mayer.

“She’s at an age where she is thinking with her head not just her heart,” a source close to the actress tells OK!, adding that the event will take place this fall. “No way would she still be with anyone if marriage wasn’t a real option.”

When Jen married Brad Pitt eight years ago, they spent $1 million on the ceremony, which featured a gospel choir, four bands, fireworks and an estimated 50,000 flowers!

But this time around, Jen wants something entirely different. “She doesn’t want anything elaborate or showy,” one friend tells OK!.

With best friend Courteney Cox as her matron of honor and godchild Coco Arquette as her flower girl, Jen will have all the attendants she needs or wants.

With both of them sharing the same laid-back and down-to-earth lifestyle, friends say Jen and John, 30, are made for each other.

“They are just a perfect match,” says a friend. “And everything about that will come through in this beautiful wedding.”

[From OK! Magazine]

You know those inspirational e-mail chain letters that Snopes calls glurge? They usually focus on stories of questionable origin like a terminally sick child getting his hospital bills paid by someone he once talked to in a restaurant. That’s what OK! Magazine is like at times. They’re one of the nicer celebrity glossies, and they never give us grief about using their exclusive photos, but it’s part sickly sweet fiction with enough details added in that you might be inclined to believe it if you don’t dig any deeper.

The bulleted details that OK! includes on the cover to add legitimacy to this article are:

  • Intimate Beverly Hills I Do’s?
  • Strapless Vera Wang Dress
  • Matron of Honor Courteney Cox
  • Orchids, Oysters and Champagne
  • Honeymoon in Greece!

Ten to one these are just suggestions for Jen and John on their special day and the rest of the article is filled with quotes from a source, but we’ll have to see. I know I’ll be buying this issue to find out what all the fuss is about, and so will countless other people. OK! couldn’t afford the photos of Knox and Vivienne, but they can help us imagine what Aniston’s dream backyard wedding would be like. If she were actually engaged and planning to marry that guy she’s been with for about four and a half months.

Update: Aniston’s annoyed rep calls this story, along with another one that ran in Star about how Aniston wants Mayer’s surly baby “complete fabrications”

But her rep tells Usmagazine.com: “She is not getting married.”

See what a body language expert had to say about Jen Aniston and John Mayer.

Meanwhile, Star claims in its latest issue that she is going to have Mayer’s baby “as Brad and Angie’s twins wow the world.”

Says Aniston’s rep: “Both headlines are complete fabrications.”

[From US Magazine]

He forgot to add – “but if she was getting married again, it would be just like OK! describes, and she’s always wanted a honeymoon in Greece. That sounds so dreamy.”

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

36 Responses to “OK! Magazine runs Aniston & Mayer’s “wedding of the year” (update: denied)”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. RaeJillian says:

    i WISH they would get married! i love them together. they are even featured on my blog as one of my top five celeb couples – check it out! i posted it a week ago and my sister nearly flipped. i love them! if brad can be whipped by the hollywood h0e then jen should wind up calming the famous man h0e, and then babies and OMG they should have babies! :mrgreen:

  2. Kaiser says:

    I really like OK’s passive-aggressive sub-head “FINALLY OVER BRAD” – like, “Can you believe she’s been throwing a Pity Party for more than THREE YEARS??!?!?!? Can we marry her off already?!?”

  3. JoGirl says:

    Ridiculous! Jen must be pretty pissed about this story considering that she’s dating a notorious commitment-phobe. On the other hand, if this doesn’t scare him away, nothing will!

  4. JohnnieR says:

    Count this dude as one who is NOT a fan of Jennifer Anacin – the overhyped TV wannabee Movie Star 39-goin-on-40 woman who thinks she’s still a girlie. Anacin, if not for her marriage to Brad Pitt, would have been as quickly and brutally shoved to the side of the Warners soundstage as her former ‘Friends’ castmates.

    I said it before, I’ll say it again – Anacin’s time as a playa is running out. Sad that in tinseltown any female ‘celeb’ over 35, hell, 25, is considered old fodder, but that’s the cruel truth.

  5. Terry says:

    buahaha…

    “her rep tells Usmagazine.com: “She is not getting married.”

    Huvaine, so predictable )

  6. Guest says:

    Kaiser: She is not the one throwing a “pity party”. The magazines are the ones bringing this up. She said almost three years ago that she didn’t want to be part of this “triangle”. But the magazines know that having Jen’s name with Brad’s name on any cover will sell better. I am sure that she is very sick of it. Don’t blame her for the crazy tabloid headlines. That would be like blaming Brad and Angie for the crazy headlines they get!

  7. Kaiser says:

    @Guest: See Vanity Fair Sept. 2005. She is the one throwing a Pity Party. She used those exact words.

    But I agree partly about her & her management not always having control over the tabloid headlines, which is why I gave props to OK for the editor’s passive-aggressiveness.

    But isn’t a bit fishy that the same week that the Brange twins come out, there is glowing coverage of said Pity Party?

    @Terry – Predictable Huvane, indeed. 🙂

  8. Rio says:

    “Orchids, oysters and champagne”?

    Cool, an aphrodisiac-themed wedding! I’ve always wanted to go to one of those!

  9. anastasiabeaverhausen says:

    Guest: well it doesn’t help when people keep connecting her name to ANY story that comes out about Angelina and Brad.

    I nearly sprained my eyeballs rolling them so hard at this story. Suuuuure, right. John Mayer isn’t getting married to anyone anytime soon and I do think this “relationship” is for publicity. So she can stay in the spotlight.

    Whatever. Girlfriend’s not getting married.

  10. Beyond Border says:

    She is so predictable, eveytime there’s MAJOR news about Brad and Angelina X’s PR plant rumor then denied said rumor just to keep the CHIN relevant. Let me guess there will be another pics of maniston in a skimpy bikini while frolicking in Joe Francis beach resort in MEHICO !! 😆

    I think Maniston love BAD BOYS .. john mayer, joe francis hmmmmmm she’s a FREAK

  11. CelebitchyFAN says:

    I’m taking this story like I am the one about her giving him an ultimatim to move in…with a huge grain of salt.

  12. Michele says:

    well she can kiss him goodbye now. this kind of publicity is what broke he and Chestica Simpson up….poor dumb Jennifer

  13. KERRI says:

    nastasiabeaverhausen: you’ve got it right again! By the way, has anyone noticed that JM is morphing into a Brad Pitt look-alike (2002), but without the blond hair? CHINNIFER is spending her money well into this investment. ALL JM has to do is get this pathetic woman pregrant, get his movie deal going and he’s got it made in the shaaddeeee! Job well done.

  14. Trace says:

    Beyond Border – so very true! I didn’t believe it at first and gave her the benefit of the doubt. But, this is a pattern with her and it gets repeated over and over again. Whenever there’s big news about Brad, you always end up hearing “news” about Jen. And then the quick denial by her rep is issued almost as immediate as the story comes out.

    She’s finally in a relationship. She has some movies coming out. She really should just focus on her relationship and her career rather than trying to stay relevant in the tabloid headlines week after week.

  15. someone says:

    I think some of you haters should go back to JustJared and kneel at the shrine that is Angelina Jolie..Please… Im so sick of hearing Chinnifer, and pity party..I think you haters want her to be miserable so badly, that you actually believe she is…She hasn’t mentioned Brad Pitts name in years..and I believe she has been over him for a very long time..so shes having fun with John…so what..shes single and rich and beautiful..so why not…If I could choose to be either Jen or Angelina for a month..trust me..it sure wouldn’t be Angelina

  16. daisy424 says:

    @someone, I for one could care less about JA. I think she was good in “Friends”, but I don’t hate her. I save that emotion for my ex.

    I think the reason she is brought up when it comes to Jolie/Pitt posts is the other people keep bringing up that Brad “cheated” on JA, with Angelina.

    Put your anger at their doorstep, not the BADettes.

  17. Kaiser says:

    @Daisy – What are you doing here? Why aren’t you kneeling at “the shrine that is Angelina Jolie”??!?! 🙂

  18. daisy424 says:

    Just doin’ some ‘splaining. I must have succeeded in being fair. Did you buy it? 😀
    It’s all about the buttons.

  19. paris herpes says:

    it’s so pathetic how they need to make up stuff like this. honestly, they must be so bored over at star. jennifer aniston is the least exciting celeb they write about, cause all she does is exercise and toke hella weed with John Mayer (im speculating).

  20. Kaiser says:

    @Daisy – Oh, I totally bought it. Now go back to The Shrine.

    *daydreaming*

    Wouldn’t it be fun to actually go to The Shrine? We could be in the South of France right now, drinking wine with The Pitt and braiding Princess Z’s hair. Good times. 🙂

  21. daisy424 says:

    You braid Ms. Z’s hair and chat with Angie, Brad and I will discuss in a private meeting how I will design the babies rooms 8)

  22. anastasiabeaverhausen says:

    someone, give me a break. It’s people like you who KEEP bringing up Jennifer Aniston every single bloody time Angelina Jolie or Brad Pitt is brought up. Since you said that, look at the posts under yours–all about A&B. See what you did?

    The original posts that even brought up Brad were because it was in the TABLOID headline. And it was called passive-aggressive on the part of the tabloid.

    So chill out. Go work on your own little Jennifer Aniston shrine. Personally I don’t like OR dislike her. I’d have to gather up some emotional energy for either one of those things and she doesn’t inspire anything in me beyond a yawn.

  23. Kaiser says:

    Well played, Beaverhausen. You can play Barbies with Shiloh when we go to The Shrine.

  24. daisy424 says:

    Kaiser, she can’t play Barbies, Clover has them and she doesn’t share. vdantev sent her to the kiddie table, remember?

  25. Guest says:

    First: I think that it is fine to have a pity party when you divorce. Are women suppose to pretend that a marriage breaking up is a “fun” time. All men and women who face the end of a marraige reflect and cry abit about the break up. Normal behavior. And it is sad that women bash women for admting weakness and sadness in their lives.

    Second: Jen is on the cover of the magazines because they are competing against the People cover. Who sells magazines better than Jen. No one. According to Forbes she sells the best. They put her on in an effort to increase sales and take away sales from People. For example if they put Katie and Tom on the cover or Kate who would care. But since they have Jennifer every single blog is talking about it. It gets them hits and sells magazines. That is why she is on the cover.

    Third: Jen in no way wants to be connnected to Brad or Angie she has said this in interviews. She is long over Brad but for some reason Brad/Angie fans like to feel that she is still sad about the break up. I am not sure why? Anyway most of the nasty posts against Jen are from Brad and Angie fans. YOu would think that they would be happy just enjoying Brad and Angie’s movies and new family but they are not. REally really weird.

  26. Bodhi says:

    I wonder if Jen & John could sue over this…

    I can’t imagine how fucking annoying it must be to have flat out lies printed about you

  27. PJ says:

    Did anybody ever notice that People and other celeb sites place stories about exs next to each other?

    The Nicole Kidman picture goes next to Tom Cruise & Katie, Brangelina next to John & Jen, Kate Hudson next to Owen Wilson, etc. etc.

  28. Mairead says:

    I’m afraid I’m agreeing with some of what someone and Guest says – any “pity party” was three years ago. She’s allowed to grieve for her marriage – but I’m sure she’s moved on. Just a shame some editors haven’t 🙄

    As for the story… lord – how many wedding and Aniston clichés can they shove in. How about hair products as wedding favours? Plates subdivided into the Zone portions?

    Anyway. I’d best go and add extra sparkles to my Shrine. 😆

  29. vdantev says:

    Why buy the cow when you get the milk for free.

  30. RAN says:

    Well said Mairead, I was going to say the same thing, but you said it much better than I would have.

    Honestly, if people really followed celebrity ‘news’, they would see the pattern – Jennifer Aniston gets brought up every time BP and AJ are doing something ‘special’ simply because the magazines bring her up. She’s not necessarily trying to outdo anyone or gain excessive media attention (IMO), the magazines are trying to SELL the cover.

  31. sj says:

    why does Jen’s face on the cover, sale mags? she could stop that if she wanted, she loves the attention,she or her pr/agents might have paid for the cover, it was predicted before it came out, she would be in the lime light again, because of brad, brad dumped her years ago, so she gets the pity, but people are starting to see through her. it’s sad what she has to do to stay relevant.

  32. RAN says:

    Yep, you said it sj! She took the time to write the article, took the pictures and then lobbied to sell the magazine with her picture on it… What was I thinking? Of COURSE she brings this on herself 🙄

  33. Amy says:

    I seriously doubt she “plants” these stories. In fact, she’s probably embarrassed every time her name is brought up in relation to the dude who cheated on her and dumped her!

    I couldn’t care less about JA, but let the girl get on with her life. You are the ones obsessed with Brad, not her!

  34. kate says:

    WTF? jennifer aniston dated joe francis?! eeeeeeeeeewwwww!

  35. nancy says:

    and who in the world is joe francis?