Elisabetta Canalis appears in a new Cavalli ad: total mess or just fine?

eli1

Last year, around this time, Elisabetta Canalis was named the official crotch of Roberto Cavalli underwear. Cavalli is Italian, and so is Elisabetta. She also wears a lot of Cavalli gowns. And Cavalli loves George Clooney. So… it seemed like an okay fit, especially given the simple fact that Elisabetta’s career should consist only of wandering around in her underwear. I’m saying that the girl can’t act her way out of a paper bag, but she makes a half-decent underwear model. Anyway, Cavalli has released an image from Elisabetta’s latest campaign – I guess her crotch contract got extended. The shot is okay, but the shadow on her neck is certainly interesting. It’s like Cavalli knows there is gossip about her Adam’s Apple. No, I jest. Cavalli loves her!

Cavalli spoke about Elisabetta, saying: “For my new underwear collection I chose Elisabetta again… my ideal of a woman: charm, charisma and sensuality, united together. Elisabetta Canalis and I have been friends for a while now, we’ve worked together in the past and once again during this shoot she was perfect in enhancing the spirit of this advertising campaign. With her Mediterranean beauty and intense gaze she’s interpreted an intriguing and super-feminine woman.” So… Eli is our ideal, okay? Take that down.

wenn3131946

wenn5581594

Additional photos courtesy of WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

75 Responses to “Elisabetta Canalis appears in a new Cavalli ad: total mess or just fine?”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. skibunny says:

    I wouldn’t call her beautiful or pretty but she’s definately attractive. Great figure too!

  2. tiki says:

    yikes! talk about man-hands. the photo of her groping her own breasts looks like there’s a guy reaching around from behind her. clooney must be a very secure male to allow those paws anywhere near his manbits. they must dwarf anything in their grasp.

  3. brin says:

    That doesn’t even look like the same tranny.

  4. mia girl says:

    Her body looks nice, but yeah, she does has strong facial features.

    Her face looks sorta tranny.

  5. the original bellaluna says:

    Yeah. NO. She’s not a traditional beauty, nor is she a “Mediterranean beauty.” That is all…

  6. j says:

    I like the rope around her legs..

    Wonder if that is for old Georgie!

  7. Rita says:

    Kaiser, if this is too graphic or explicit, I understand but I tried the seductive underwear thing once including a fancy headdress and hoped to steep the mood in nostalgic pulsating rhythms from a 70’s greatest hits 8-track tape I borrowed from my parents (Carmen Miranda meets Bogart in a sultry apple orchard as it were). I lit the scented candles (Mango Mist) to fill the room with a sensuous tropical ambiance and placed a stiletto heel on the bed to smooth a stocking before adjusting a garter (almost pulled a muscle). Barry White’s penetrating baritone in “I’m Gonna Love You Just a Little More Baby” was about to have me writhing with abandon to begin a night of “amore libertad”.

    Unfortunately, the toddling tune of Puff The Magic Dragon resulted in a failure to launch (Poor Puff). With all the dignity of an experienced madam, I gracefully advanced the tape knowing that whatever the song, the show must go on. To make a long story short, halfway through Miss Joplin’s Piece Of My Heart (Come on, come on and take it!) I was wearing my wonder bra like a surgical mask, the room looked like a cornucopia had been put through a wood chipper, and the curtains caught fire.

  8. Eve says:

    I think she looks good in that shot.

  9. malachais says:

    She’s beautiful regardless of her masculine features, the only thing that bugs me are her random tattoos, especially that arm band.

  10. jenn says:

    Looks like one of her trashy arm tattoos was airbrushed off. Obviously not the only thing that was airbrushed either.

  11. Dana M says:

    SHe has a very masculine face. Perhaps her voice and demeanor is soft and even its out. I agree, she does have total * Man Hands*. Obviously, George finds this masculinity attractive. She does have a nice figure though.

  12. skibunny says:

    oops! I spelt definitely wrong.
    Not a big fan of the tattoos either.

  13. guesty says:

    Just fine.

  14. nikki says:

    She is beautiful, hands, tattoos and all.

  15. Amanda says:

    I think she is definitely sexy. The arm band tattoo cracks me up. She looks good in the pics.

  16. Cherry Rose says:

    I think she’s beautiful and has a great body as well.

    However, in that ad, her face looks horrible. It makes her look like she’s actually a man dressing up as a woman.

    I think she looks better when there’s little to no make up on her.

  17. Someone Else says:

    I remember when I used to care what George Clooney did.

    Then he got boring. And he just seems so smug. I mean, he isn’t ugly but I’ve never thought he was as hot as he thought he was…

    Anyway, he seems to like this one. I do recall that he said he didn’t understand lot of what she was saying, so it sounds perfect for him.

  18. Really says:

    I Do not care for the girl. But you cannot help man hands. It’s sucky genetics. 🙁

  19. Susette says:

    @Rita – ROLFL!! Thanks for that hilarious image! Ah, the best laid plans.

  20. Camille says:

    I think she makes a better underwear model than Megan ‘dead behind the eyes’ Fox. At least EC mustered some kind of emotion/intensity in her eyes. She has a nice figure.

  21. Marie says:

    In the bottom pick, she looks like the average everyday woman. Gotta love photoshop.

  22. Hmmm says:

    George is a smug cynic, very unattractive in a man. She just underscores that point about his character regarding women.

  23. Tazina says:

    Other than those awful tats, she looks great.

  24. Lynda says:

    I wish my only talent was to look good in underwear.

  25. M says:

    just another **** no nothing special at all and not that her waist look like man she doesn’t have waist

    yes cavali must heard about adam apple thing she is a joke .

  26. observer says:

    Both Canalis and Cavalli give off a very dark aura, or at least that’s what I get from them. I guess that’s why Cavalli likes her, that and because of her being associated with Clooney which results in a little free advertising. This shoot looks almost identical to the last one, dim lighting, heavy makeup, contorted body position to make it look like she has a feminine waist and curves. She’s not attractive at all, very mannish even with makeup and photoshop. Clooney gave her some great opportunities, but she doesn’t seem interested in becoming anything better than the trash she is. I hope the publicity fauxmance contract is over because I want to use eye bleach whenever this skank appears on my computer monitor.

  27. california angel says:

    I really like the use of colors in that pic she looks great. I like her hair in the last thumbnail, cute!

  28. gamblea says:

    doesn’t he break up with them for modeling?

  29. Lola7 says:

    The last picture of her smiling reminds me of Lady Gaga – not a good look at all.

  30. TeeTee says:

    uh,nice boots..

    that used to be/is a man, there are too many things that are masculine..ok, huge man hands.
    what about the adam’s apple and the shoulders w/upper arms..

    nevamind, smdh. GC likes it, shrugs.

  31. tuscan sun says:

    Has anyone noticed that the underwear is really ugly? I wouldn’t buy it no matter who the model was.

  32. la_chica says:

    she is gorgeous

  33. Liana says:

    There’s some funky photoshopping where that rope goes over her leg. I think that rope was shopped into the pic. And her leg below the rope is all funky.

  34. TjustT says:

    who is this? oh right nobody! nuf said!

  35. Solveig says:

    She has a very unfortunate looking smile, other than that she is cute. And yes, she’s a Mediterranean beauty.
    I don’t like Cavalli, tho.

  36. Lucy says:

    Never cared for Cavalli…

    I prefer her natural looks without makeup (insert sarcasm). How they worked together in the past?

    She said she was never a model in this interview:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8oZSuLqh3cU

  37. Gabriela says:

    She’s so beautiful. Man hands? Her hands are fine for me.

  38. observer says:

    I see that the publicist brigade has arrived to try to convince us that Canalis is beautiful. LOL.

  39. munchies says:

    all i know she is gorgeous and smoking hot.

  40. Solveig says:

    I see that the obsessed observer has arrived here claiming that EC’s publicists are working hard to make her appear beautiful.
    @obsessed observer, if you are a fan of Clooney and you can stand her because she’s his partner, have you ever thought that maybe he likes “whores” (as you call her), and that therefore he’s not as a class act as you apparentely believe he is? “Dio li fa e poi li accoppia”, as we say here.
    @Lucy, I can’t see the video ’cause of connection problems, but I know she already modeled for L’Oréal, for a fashion house and for a brand of jewels, I don’t know why she’s claiming that she has never been a model, meh.

    Luckily they photoshopped that awful tattoo away.

  41. Lucy says:

    Well, I don’t see anything special about her, that’s all… She is plain, cute, but plain. I have many Italian friends in both Universities that I attended way prettier than she is. Well, we can say GC is not shallow, can’t we?! 😉

  42. crtb says:

    That ad is the best I have ever seen her.

  43. jane16 says:

    Canalis & Cavalli are a perfect match.

  44. lucy2 says:

    I’d never guess that was her.

  45. bellyache says:

    Honestly ? I think she’s beautiful. Always so.

  46. Katie says:

    TRANNY MESS

    hot body though, i wish i had enough money to have a bod like hers!

  47. All says:

    please where this girl waist?

    http://media.onsugar.com/files/2011/01/01/2/192/1922398/f323fc9b9e6159fa_spl237200_021wtmk.preview.jpg

    she is sure for cavali because of clooney, she is not under wears model bodytype bit she can’t get other stupid designer line work ecxpet that one ever with so flaws and short legs also

  48. Anti-icon says:

    Whatever. She’s very attractive (I don’t dig the tats)…..I’d rather see a designer choose her than….Rumer Willis, for example. This partnership at least makes sense…..mature styles on a “edgy” internationally known “personality.” It doesn’t make me want the clothing. It seems like a desperate publicity ploy.

  49. R. Harris says:

    Clooney’s last fake grilfriend got a lot of press right before they split- pattern developing???????

  50. observer says:

    @Solveig, your comments about me are false, inappropriate, and slanderous. I have not made any comments about you, but I don’t have to as it’s obvious to everyone now what you are and why you post here. People who have followed Clooney news over the last few months have noticed a pattern of Canalis’s publicity people showing up on blogs to extol her non-existent virtues and also attack anyone who criticizes her. I’m not the self-proclaimed celebrity here, and slandering me is beyond sleazy. I’m a commenter on a blog. If slandering blog commenters is the best strategy you can come up with, you have no creativity or intelligence, but then neither does your client.

  51. Hakura says:

    @Rita @7- xD I think I got lost between the ‘puff the magic dragon’ & the curtains catching fire. I suppose some imagination is required to figure out how that came about? (It’s still a hilarious mental image, LOL)

    I don’t think her hands are manly… She just has long fingers. (Like me x_x). If her nails weren’t so short, it would definitely improve the ‘femininity’ of them.

    She does look really different in the candid shots (facially) than in the ad.

  52. lol says:

    she is ugly without make up with alot of lies she is low low low girlfriend!

  53. Lucy says:

    @solveig, if you go to youtube-this is the title of the video: Elisabrutta sul set di Leverage

    Well,she said the only things she did related to modeling was due to her work on tv, but she was never a model…

  54. Solveig says:

    @observer, you are a real observer! You are the only one here in CB who has found out who I really am!
    Ok, I’m making this confession hoping that Kayser & Co will be glad for having me, the one and only ELISABETTA CANALIS, posting here in their site.

    Seriously, observer, aren’t you the one who come over CB just to post very disrespectful, vulgar, sour words towards this woman who’s only fault is being Clooney’s partner -or beard- of almost 2 years?
    If you read properly I’ve never said something bad about you, I just stated the obvious: you are obsessed, plain and simple.
    And I get that people may not like her – I for one (surprisingly!) I’m far from being a fan of hers – but you are quite over the top, it’s impossible not noticing your obsession. And your insinuations on my intelligence or my alleged relation to EC don’t make you sound smarter, just plain nuts and obsessed.

    @Lucy, I’m able to see the video now and I think that she misunderstood the question. I guess that for Elisabetta “modeling” is “catwalk shows”, and actually she never did it, for what I know, in fact she says that she’s too short, and being short is not an issue for campaings as Cavalli’s ones or L’Oréal’s, on the other hand it’s an issue on catwalks.

  55. observer says:

    @Solveig, you made me laugh saying that you’re Canalis. Please, Cagnalis can barely string two words together in English. You’re either publicity or some other associate of hers. Cagnalis has commented at times on several blogs, though, resulting in much hilarity. There was one thread on JustJared a while back on which she demanded that people call her a v.i.p., those orders written in broken English. Oh, there was also a lovely comment she recently made in Italian to a fellow commenter which translated to say “go f*ck sh*t” in English. If anyone is obsessed, it’s the skank and her publicist, the obsession being with controlling comments about her even if that means trying to defame and intimidate complete strangers on internet blogs. She apparently cannot accept the fact that she cannot control free speech and truth. She wants to force her lies upon everyone without being challenged, and maybe she can do that to some extent in Italy where Berlusconi owns and censors a lot of the media, but in the USA we value freedom of speech and expression.

    “Clooney’s partner -or beard- of almost 2 years”
    I’ll take PUBLICITY CONTRACT for a thousand, Alex. I notice you left that particular possibility off your list. You really hate the truth being posted, don’t you. She’s not a partner or a beard. She and Clooney had a publicity contract that lasted less than a year and a half. Yes, people realize that they haven’t done a photo op together in over a month.

    “you are obsessed, plain and simple.”
    Right, because anyone who posts the truth versus publicity lies must be “obsessed.” It’s a sleazy tactic that Cagnalis and her publicist have been doing for over a year– insulting and slandering anyone who refuses to worship the skank. As I said before, I have the urge to use eye bleach whenever the skank appears on my computer monitor. Her and her publicist’s nasty behavior towards blog commenters have only added to my reaction of instant revulsion whenever her skankly image intrudes upon my visual space. You’re either her publicist or one of her other trashy associates, or else you have some kind of thing for her, making you the obsessed one here. She’s nothing to me except a particularly nasty skank who is too arrogant and stupid to read the writing on the wall.

  56. redrose66 says:

    she looks good in the ad, but the one with her walking looks – odd

  57. j says:

    ugly girl

  58. Newbie says:

    they’ve made her look like a real woman in the ad. i’m sure it was hard to do.

  59. liel says:

    http://yeeeah.com/2011/02/04/elisabetta-canalis-for-cavalli/elisabetta-canalis-roberto-cavalli-6/

    look at her in this ugly underwears standing look like man very ugly body

    all u see is airbrushing and photo op search for the real pics for this cavali ads she is too ugly without photo op

  60. Lucy says:

    @solveig: I did get that too or, in a more sarcastic and interesting comment:
    maybe she did not misundertand the question, maybe and I say just maybe…her super arrogant ego thought she was asked how her acting job on leverage differed from her TOP model job… maybe she thought if she was tall enough she was (is) so exceptional that she could be a TOP model, but not now because she is 31 and she likes to “dcho” what she does (tv presenter and actress- cough!).

    …But if …if she really misunderstood the question, I would suggest to her that she should go back to University where she was studying languages…

  61. JenJen says:

    Yeah, her “oddness” is pegged in the comments. Is it me or has anyone ever heard any of his “girlfriends” speak?

    LOL @ Rita, I bet you are alot of fun to be around!

  62. Aqua says:

    As far as I’m concerned ANYONE can look great/beautiful as long as you have all the right people, it’s amazing to see the difference between a “before and after” when a transformation has taken place. Hairdressers.make-up artist,clothes,trainer,gym.It’s their job to make you look good.But when you take away all of that they are just ordinary looking people.Very few are beautiful naturally.It’s a big part of their job to look good/beautiful especially when selling/promoting something.

  63. Solveig says:

    @Lucy, you may be right but I think that it is misunderstanding simply because in Italy the word “model” (modella/o) is generally (but not always) used to describe the people who actually work on catwalks, while people who are on campaigns like this Cavalli’s one are called “testimonials” (as she said). It’s not a matter of plain ignorance, just a different meaning of the word “model”.
    And as an Italian speaking person myself I would condone such errors…
    Finally, I think she’s too busy trying to sound pleasant to act like an arrogant.

    Ps: that fuchsia bikini (trikini?) is horrible, what was she thinking?

  64. Lucy says:

    @solveig: Yes, it makes sense (a bit)…

    As a Portuguese speaking person, I would understand the mistake because in Portuguese the word model is used for both catwalk and advertising, when they refer it as catwalk they say Top model or work in a runway show to distinguish from a advertising model. Testimonials can be used in English for different purposes (advertising, testimony, validation…).
    I just cannot understand how someone wants to make a living as an actress in a country where she barely speaks the language.
    ps: Solveig, for a second I thought you were GC (hahaha), but then you said fuchsia bikini…j/k. I know he’s working on locations for Ides of March and he would not go online to defend/talk about his other half (the love of his life- as Lainey says the Italian Queen), 😉

  65. Aqua says:

    @ Lucy, whatever “The Italian Queen” wants George gets lol.

  66. observer says:

    Regarding the “Italian (Drag) Queen” label, Lainey is either on the take or is snorting the good stuff with Elisabrutta. Really, though, Lainey is a known shill. There is no way her blog pays for her trips to Cannes, so she’s supplementing her income somehow. The way I see it, what she does is a form of extortion, since she defames celebs whose publicists don’t make deals with her. Cagnalis’s publicity contract has been over for quite a while, and again, she was never Clooney’s girlfriend, let alone his “other half.”

    @Lucy “I just cannot understand how someone wants to make a living as an actress in a country where she barely speaks the language.”
    Yes, I very much agree with you on this. No one here can understand this, either.

  67. lion says:

    clooney made fun of this girl elisabetta when he said he will not marry her while they are together for almost two years now ,poor girl . he must not taking her seriously at all or even feel love to her .

  68. Lucy says:

    @Aqua: Amen!

    @Observer: I think GC is a grown man, (almost half century of existence, right?!). He knows exactly what he does and why he does it…
    I personally don’t (want to)believe in the PR – contract story. May be he does not have much fun as he had in the beginning, but when Piers Morgan made a joke about being only friends with GC’s girlfriend, GC did not deny he was not dating. On the contrary, he went along with the joke…

    Talking about Lainey, she tends to be more sarcastic towards EC than pro-EC, in my understanding…

  69. observer says:

    @Lucy, I’ve never said he wasn’t dating anyone. He’s just not “dating” Canalis. She was only his publicity front, having nothing to do with his private life. He never mentioned Canalis at all during the interview. Of course he would have gone along with a generic joke about an unnamed girlfriend. Canalis is a random woman, she’s homely, she picked him up in Italy– these are all things that Clooney has said in reference to Canalis. Their photo ops show that they are very uncomfortable with each other. You can’t fake chemistry, and they don’t have it. Add to that the fact that they are never together unless it’s for a photo op. I don’t think Canalis is able to get in touch with him anymore, can you say blocked phone number? She stayed in L.A. over the Golden Globes, probably hoping he would take her, but of course that didn’t happen, and then she showed up late for her job in Italy. It’s pretty clear that he’s not in touch with her unless he wants to set up a photo op, and I don’t think that’s going to happen again.

  70. Lucy says:

    @obserber: “you can’t fake chemistry”- I agree with you on that.
    Why on Earth he would fake a relationship and even bring her to prestigious awards-introduce to his parents, etc? what he gains with it? the more he fakes relationships, the more people question his sexual preferences (which I don’t care and it’s none of my business). But I just don’t get it…

  71. loveyourwork says:

    let’s get one thing straight:
    THE WOMAN IS NOT UGLY. and she looks great in this ad, photoshopped or not.

    Haters: if you had her jam, wouldn’t you at least be a VJ on MTV or on some sort of red carpet or in a magazine somewhere? Being someone like Elisabetta?
    Wouldn’t you?

    I’m ranting, but I read this blog daily and there is so much bitterness towards so many women, especially in regards to their appearance and I’m really over people harshing on about nothing. We get up in arms about men objectifying us and calling us names, but look at the way we act towards each other. Not very fair, certainly not as equals.

    MAN HANDS?! hahaha you obviously haven’t met many 6’0 women. I’m 5’11 and I don’t have man hands, but I have had a guy tell me the my hands dwarfed his junk. He wasn’t upset about it and I wasn’t insecure after he made the comment, it’s just a fact.

    SOMETIMES TALL WOMEN HAVE LARGE HANDS.
    GET OVER IT.

    I’m calling jealous on all the women acting like bitches on this thread.

  72. observer says:

    @loveyourwork, beauty is in the eye of the beholder. This woman, if she is in fact a woman, is ugly, IMO. She’s short, so being tall has nothing to do with the size of her hands. She has weird bone structure including bowlegs, masculine features, and a wide neck. If she weren’t “modeling,” no one would be talking about her looks, but looks are the biggest job qualification for modeling. There are truly beautiful women who get lots of love on this site: Mila Kunis and Julianne Moore, to name a couple. So your jealousy theory doesn’t apply. What’s to be jealous of, here? Being an untalented cokewhore? No, thanks. If I’m going to be jealous of someone, it will be of someone with more going for them than I have going for me.

    And yeah, the whole calling anyone who dares criticize this skank “jealous” is really old. I don’t know why you bother with American blogs, anyway. She won’t be getting any more work in the US unless it’s in porn or a Valtrex commercial, so you may as well limit your efforts to Italian blogs.

  73. Lucy says:

    @loveyourwork: ok, I will admit it. I am jealous, so jealous that I am dying of it and well…gotta go now to celebrate my fabulous birthday!

    ps: I hope I won’t get drunk and won’t cry wishing I was her (insert sarcasm!)

  74. halo says:

    @loveyourwork:

    SOMETIMES TALL WOMEN HAVE LARGE HANDS.

    elisabetta is avarage not tall woman high heels help but it’s Obvious

    she is short any thing under 170 cm is short this is the globle standered and she with out heals is 168 cm