Natalie Portman is “deeply shocked & disgusted” by John Galliano’s anti-Semitism

wenn3134374

Yesterday, I saw a short video clip of Natalie Portman answering questions just after she won her Best Actress Oscar. Some journalist asked her about her association with the House of Dior – she’s the face of Miss Dior Cherie – and what her feelings were about the controversy surrounding Dior’s designer, John Galliano. Natalie’s publicist (or somebody else) short-stopped her answer, but she looked like she was prepared to say something. Now she has, coming on the heels of the video release of Galliano drunkenly saying that he loves Hitler. Natalie, who is Jewish and who was born in Israel, is seriously pissed off:

Oscar winner Natalie Portman today expressed her ‘disgust’ at British fashion designer John Galliano – saying she would ‘not be associated with him in any way’ because of his alleged anti-Semitism.

The 29-year-old actress, who won best actress at the Academy Awards on Sunday for her role in Black Swan, said she was shocked by a video in which Mr Galliano says ‘I love Hitler’ and says two women ‘should have been gassed’.

Ms Portman, who was born in Israel, is currently the face of a perfume by Christian Dior – the fashion label which has suspended Galliano as its chief designer pending an enquiry. The fact that she has now publicly attacked him means his future will be increasingly untenable, especially as he faces a prison sentence for his remarks.

Ms Portman said in a statement: ‘I am deeply shocked and disgusted by the video of John Galliano’s comments that surfaced today. In light of this video, and as an individual who is proud to be Jewish, I will not be associated with Mr. Galliano in any way. I hope at the very least, these terrible comments remind us to reflect and act upon combating these still-existing prejudices that are the opposite of all that is beautiful.’

Ms Portman frequently visits Paris, where Galliano is said to have launched anti-Semitic attacks on at least four women, because she is the face of Miss Dior Cherie, and is engaged to French ballet dancer Benjamin Millepied.

Galliano, past clients include Princess Diana and French First Lady Carla Bruni, visited a police station in the French capital on Monday to meet some of his accusers, but insisted: ‘I’m no racist.’

It followed the emerged of the video filmed at Le Perle, a Paris bar, last December in which Mr Galliano says to two unnamed Italian women : ‘People like you ought to be dead, your mothers, your forefathers would all be f*****g gassed. I love Hitler.’

One of their male companions started videoing the incident because he was so shocked.

An unnamed 48-year-old woman has also made a formal complaint to police that she was also subjected to anti-Semitic abuse by Galliano at the same bar last October. She is believed to have come forward after publicity about the case of Geraldine Bloch, 35, and Philppe Virgitti, 41. Last Thursday at La Perle he allegedly told Ms Bloch: ‘Dirty Jew, you should be dead.’ He is then said to have told Mr Virgitti, who is of Asian origin: ‘F***ing Asian b***tard, I’m going to kill you.’

Ironically none of the four women involved is Jewish – despite the alleged verbal assaults having taken place in Le Marais, Paris’s traditional Jewish quarter. On Friday Galliano launched a counter-claim in a civil court in Paris for defamation against Miss Bloch and Mr Virgitti. He met them at a Paris police station after being ordered to do so by prosecutors. A police source said the Public Prosecutor’s Office wanted to get them all together before deciding on whether to charge Galliano.

The detective added: ‘The accused has insisted that he is not a racist, and certainly not anti-Semitic. On the contrary, he is taking legal action against his accusers.’

During the meeting Galliano, who was brought up in South London, ‘denied all the charges against him’.

Galliano’s lawyer, Stephane Zerbib, insisted that the video on the internet has ‘no value’ and that Galliano has ‘never’ been anti-Semitic while working at Dior, which has a ‘zero tolerance’ policy towards such behaviour. He faces being sacked by the fashion house following an investigation.

[From The Daily Mail]

I told you yesterday that the Galliano controversy had gotten to the point where the celebrities associated with Dior were now going to come under criticism unless they distanced themselves. While I don’t care for Natalie in general, I think her statement was completely appropriate and she showed the requisite amount of disgust. I even read that Natalie’s first choice for an Oscar gown was Dior, but that she pushed the Dior aside in favor of the plum-colored Rodarte at the last minute, given the Galliano controversy. Meanwhile, Sharon Stone and Nicole Kidman both wore Dior to the Oscars, and women like Marion Cotillard and Charlize Theron are still closely associated with the brand. Will those ladies have to make statements too?

diorcherie

wenn3121646

fp_6877962_portman_natalie_fp9_18_21

fp_6876399_portman_natalie_fp9_04_21

Photos courtesy of WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

89 Responses to “Natalie Portman is “deeply shocked & disgusted” by John Galliano’s anti-Semitism”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Cherry Rose says:

    Good for Natalie. I hope other celebrities follow what she is doing, as this guy is a major asshole.

    It must have been hard for her to hear of this man saying these things about the Jews. Especially since it seemed she was around this guy.

    She’s gone about this in a very great way and this really has raised my respect for her.

  2. Sumodo1 says:

    Je n’adore pas Dior.

  3. Rita says:

    This should be society’s response to every form of prejudice. Quietly turn your back on the bigots, making them the outcasts.

  4. Tess says:

    It’s the first political comment I’ve heard her articulate that makes sense to me.

  5. olivia says:

    Too bad she wasn’t “disgusted” by her buddy Roman Polanski… I guess child rapists are okay to defend…

  6. krissy says:

    I I don’t get how he can deny a video that clearly has him saying disgusting anti-semantic things! People who are aren’t anti-semantic don’t ever even think things like that!

  7. Eve says:

    Yes, she did the right thing. I’m guessing if Dior doesn’t fire him a.s.a.p. the backlash for the brand will be disastrous.

    @ Krissy:

    I think he was trying to deny the claims made by Mrs. Bloch and Mr. Virgitti — before the video (where he insults two Italian women) surfaced on the internet. Now there’s a precedent for those allegations therefore it’s going to be a lot more difficult to deny anything related to his racist rants.

  8. EdithP says:

    I don’t think these celebrities hang out with the asshat much, so I doubt they know of his anti- Semetic ways. I’m sure NP is quite disgusted.

  9. Marc says:

    How about the money from Dior. Is she disgusted as well? One word hypocrite.

  10. JenJen says:

    It’s sad that this has to cloud over her happiness over her Academy Award.

    There is her fiance’s name, of course plugged at every opportunity. I was surprised she didn’t spell it at the Oscars for print.

  11. Tess says:

    @ krissy

    It’s bad enough to be anti-semitic but being an anti-semantic is totally unacceptable.

  12. Jackson says:

    Good. Appropriate. I’m not sure any of the other women associated with Galliano/Dior need to come out and make a statement. If they’re asked, yes, but to just come out and make a statement out of the blue? Eh, I think it would feel like they were looking for attention.

  13. tapioca says:

    Why should an actress have to publically distance themselves to avoid criticism for wearing a dress? They will, but they shouldn’t have to, especially after the fact. It’s like saying anyone who drives a Ford is a Hitler-supporting, raging anti-Semite too, because Henry Ford sure-as-heck was!!

  14. Salem says:

    Marc, so just because she got paid by Dior BEFORE knowing about Galliano, makes her a ‘hypocrite’? In what possible logical way? It seems to me that you don’t even understand the fundamental definition of the word ‘hypocrite’.

  15. devilgirl says:

    I find it odd that while she is disgusted by Galliano’s anti-semitism, she was just fine with Polanski raping a 13 yr old.

    Again, an example in Hollywood, that if the situation doesn’t apply to you, or touch you in any way, then it can somehow be ignored and made to seem okay.

    While I agree, his remarks are beyond disgusting, I also think it is disgusting to support a pedophile/rapist. I might have more respect for her outrage had she had the same level of outrage over her hero, Polanski.

  16. Crash2GO2 says:

    Yeah, I’m with you olivia. Baby steps I guess.

    How this man can claim not to be prejudiced after the videos of his rants have been made public is beyond me. What a world.

  17. Praise St. Angie! says:

    interesting. when it’s personal (she’s jewish and his comments affect her), she’s got an issue.

    but when it’s a child rapist who also happens to be a good movie director, he shouldn’t be punished because he’s an artist.

    isn’t galliano an “artist” too?

    ugh. I’m glad she said what she said, but until she recants her support of Polanski, I’m not in her corner.

    EDIT: glad to see I’m not the only one seeing the hypocrisy here…

  18. Abby says:

    Good for her.
    I’m glad she wore Rodarte–didn’t they design the costumes for Black Swan? I was sad Black Swan wasn’t nominated for costume design because they were stunning.

  19. Marc says:

    Salem, Kidman and Stone i guess wore Dior on sunday. It’s just a clothes. They didn’t make any comment about it. But Portman made this very public statement about how much offended she felt. Why? Think.

  20. anti says:

    #3 – i agree rita!

  21. courtney says:

    um Roman Polanski is a different thing the girl he raped and drugged forgave him. she’s only getting coverage for what she said about Galliano because she won an oscar had she not it wouldn’t get the coverage. Nat didn’t deserve that oscar she won it just because she’d won all it’s precursors if she had actually deserved it the precursors wouldn’t matter accept maybe the golden globe The New York City Film Critics award & the SAG which mind you before 1994 the Sag awards weren’t televised.

  22. AngelMay says:

    I may be in the minority here, but it sounds like the guy is just a looney who gets trashed and acts a fool in bars. If he was involved with anti-semitic or neofascist organizations and giving money to them that would be different, but he doesn’t seem to have the attention span for that.

    Not defending the guy, he is big pals with Naomi Campbell which says it all.

    What will Nicole Kidman say? She is the actress who is most assciated with Galliano.

  23. to says:

    lets grow up! i’m tired of people being ruined for saything something anti: jew, black, gay or whatever. so what! it seems people need to get over their own ethnicity/religous self obession. just cause someone thinks differently or says something rude or offensive, you don’t need to hate on them.

  24. emine says:

    i am one of the few ppl here that like Natalie but i agree with you who say she was wrong to support Polanski , we all should pay for our mistakes , nomatter who and what we are , maybe she thought he should get a pass for the outrageous thing he has done because from what i have read Polanski’s victim and him had some sort of arrangement (financial and he appologized for his behaviour) , still a big mistake for her not to stfu about this subject

  25. Rachel says:

    Marc, she made the statement because she is a spokesperson for Dior.

  26. devilgirl says:

    Dior has fired Galliano.

    @To- But it is okay for him to hate, right? He ruined himself, no one did it to him. He has a contract that states that type of behavior is not acceptable if you are representing Dior. He knew what his contract said, he didn’t care. Now he is reaping what he “sewed”.

  27. Abby says:

    @to(23), that doesn’t make any sense. I’m glad you are ok with prejudice though. Go you!

  28. loopygorilla says:

    galliano is a racist pig and i hate racism. and alcohol brings out his true colors, no pun intended.

    anyway, its a shame natalie wasnt soo shocked at roman polanski raping that 13 yr old girl though…

    so i guess she cant pretend to be high and mighty about shit like that.

    anyway, call me crazy, but i have no faith in the fashion world and i dont believe they will dump him.

    the fashion world is filled with ego self centred selfish people who think they are gods, they live in a warp world where nothing else matters but their “art and design”. which is why bitches like karl lagerfeld use their power to bonk aspiring models, CK as well and marc jacobs and blah blah blah…

    just put them all on an island, put a dome (ala simpson movie) over them and let them bask in their own ego until they kill each other.

  29. anonymous says:

    Did she send back the money? No, she has taken blood money so she needs to shut up she is being a hypocrite. Put your money where your mouth is! Most Jews who have strong commitment to their faith,religion and the holocust will waste no time in dis associating themselves with people like that, talk is cheap.

  30. Tiffany says:

    @ JenJen. The pregnacy is the only intresting thing about her. I think that this is a out of the blue statement because she never mentioned her Judiasm before, not that it comes up in normal conversation. But I also think that she is loving this attention, even though she is ‘private’ because she is about to go into obscurity. Years ago she was on the cover of Glamour and she said something that turned me off to her. She was still riding off the Star Wars attention and she was either with the interviewer or asked about autographs and she said that she does not do them because it takes away time from people she loves. She has not been on a cover since. Hmmmm. Its always that quote I think about when speaks and I think she is full of crap.

  31. Frances says:

    @23

    That is the stupidest thing I ever heard, and I sat through The Princess Protection Program.

  32. Bill Hicks is God says:

    Roman Polanski is Jewish. Lost his family in the Holocaust. Do I think that has something to do with Natalie coming to his defence? Quite possibly.

    Galliano certainly might not be anti-semitic, however the type of goofball who likes to shock people. He seems that type of person. Combine that with booze and you have a walking lip who thinks he’s being funny.

    Prince Harry wore a Nazi uniform at a Hallowe’en party and I’m sure he was sober when he made that amazingly stupid decision too. Particularly since the House of Hanover is German and changed the name to Windsor during WWI. His great uncle Edward (David) was a Nazi sympathizer. He’s made racist remarks and people still go on about hot and do-able “Prince Ginge” is. His girlfriend Chelsea is a southern African aristocrat, everybody knows what liberal and charitable opinions they hold toward people of colour…

    Double-standard much?

  33. DGO says:

    I agree with devilgirl re. Roman Polanski. Johnny Depp publicly supports the pedo rapist, too. Disgusting.

  34. Crash2GO2 says:

    “just cause someone thinks differently or says something rude or offensive, you don’t need to hate on them.”

    Indeed. But you can stop giving them your money and public support. Which is what I advocate and it seems Hollywood is doing. As Rita said, simply turn away and shun those who are mired in hatred. When you give the same back to them, you are only engaging in similar behavior. And I don’t see anyone doing that here BTW.

  35. Pauline says:

    @to

    What the hell crack are smoking? Why are you condoning hate crimes?

  36. N.D. says:

    Don’t really like her but why should she give her money back? Galliano isn’t Dior, he’s just employed by them and they did suspend him right after this story broke.

  37. fancyamazon says:

    It is not the house of Dior’s fault that this guy is a douche. They will fire him, I am sure.

  38. emine says:

    @anonymous- she is the face of a fragrance ( miss dior cherie ) , now i am not a fashion fangirl but i dont think Galiiano has anything to do with that perfume

  39. Rosanna says:

    I don’t like Natalie Portman, I really don’t. And I keep wondering why she defended Polanski.

  40. Tess says:

    To all the anti-semites so quick to accuse Portman of hypocrisy, taking “blood money,” etc: Get off it. Your motivation is painfully transparent.

    She wasn’t and isn’t taking money from Galliano. Her contract is with Dior.

    About her general politics including the support for the rapist, perhaps this incident will lead her to reconsider her kneejerk, elitist, la la land positions.

  41. Bill Hicks is God says:

    @#40:

    To call anybody who happens to disagree with Portman and call her on her hypocrisy an “anti-semite” because you don’t agree is reprehensible.

    They used to do that centuries ago only the word was “witch!” and people were burned at the stake.

    Know what happens when a word is used too much and applied out of context, as “anti-semite” quite often is, it loses its meaning. In your case, it’s blatantly lazy, knee-jerk name calling.

    Worry about real anti-semites okay, not people who are rationally discussing and debating various perspectives here.

    I haven’t read anything anti-semitic on this thread so I don’t know what the hell you’re reading or what lens you’re reading it through.

  42. Darlene says:

    Roman Polanski and Mel Gibson get a pass, but this guy doesn’t? Hollywood needs to get their story straight.

  43. DGO says:

    @Hicks – Come now. Surely you can’t miss the sly implications behind the term “blood money”.

  44. tapioca says:

    “Why are you condoning hate crimes?”

    Playing Devil’s Advocate here, I suspect John Galliano is just an *sshole in general and used the first (and most obvious) slurs that came to mind, i.e. just because you call that girl that spilt a drink on you in the club a “fat bitch”, doesn’t mean you regularly hold rallies calling for your supporters to bring death on the obese.

    And anyone here who says they have no prejudices at all is a liar.

  45. loopygorilla says:

    @BillHicks you are soo right.
    prince harry and the royal family are the biggest racist pigs.
    but no1 cares.

    john galliano wont be punished, just you watch.

    people like anna wintour have no principals, morals or any fiber of humanity.

    explains why vogue has only ever had 2 or 3 black women on their cover. no asian,latino,american indian etc.
    the whole fashion promotes racism.
    you look at runways, they have a token asian, black girl and the rest are blond blue eyes.

    anna wintour will disown you if she caught you spreading butter on ure 99% fat free rice cracker.

    but if you made some racist remark, she probably adjusts her sunglasses for 1 second and talks about how beautiful galliano’s new collection is.

    these celebrities are hypocrits and defended rapist pedo roman polanski are not much diffent to galliano and fashion ppl or the royal family…they r all the same.

    and LOL..everyone is only focused on the jewish remark, forget that he made racist remarks to an asian person too…

  46. JenJen says:

    @#23, Ironic, you say stop the hate against the haters! It’s 2011, it’s not about people being obsessed with just their OWN race, religion or sexual orientation, it’s about civilization evolving and “growing up” as you say and NOT hating.

  47. Ferocity says:

    Wait, wait, wait.

    This isn’t about the “I love Hitler” remark, but about the fact that Nat is carrying a handbag version of LOLITA. She’s pregnant… and supported whatshisface the child rapist.

    Now, legally, she’s correct. If the rules are broken this way, what’s next? But. LOLITA?

  48. devilgirl says:

    @Darlene- Excuse me? Mel Gibson gets a pass? The man has been labeled box office poison. He can no longer work unless he finances his own movies, and even then no one will work with him. He is close to being charged for his abuse on Oksana, so where exactly has he gotten a pass?

  49. Jen says:

    If she was so proud of being Jewish, the marquee for Black Swan would have said “Starring Natalie Hershlag”

  50. Eve says:

    but if you made some racist remark, she probably adjusts her sunglasses for 1 second and talks about how beautiful galliano’s new collection is.

    @ Loopygorilla:

    I fear that may actually happen. That that major b*tch (Anna Wintour) will try — and succeed — to save his career.

  51. Bobbie says:

    I cannot believe in this day and age, when we have all so clearly learned what the Holocaust was, that anyone, anyone would ever say or feel the things this man said. Out of the overflow of the mouth, the heart speaks. Clearly, he believes that human beings should be gassed on some level or he wouldn’t say it. This makes me want to cry because if he believes it, do other people? It’s only been a few decades since 8 million people died at the command of this racist and evil person: woman, children, men, innocent human beings. Good for Natalie for saying what she said. My grandparents were Dutch farmers during WWII and I feel like I lived through this period through them. An entire continent allowed the systematic slaughter of a people. It is not to be compared with the rape of a 14 year old, no matter how horrible that may be. I now this is a little preachy for a celeb gossip site, but some things just are not light or to be bantered about in any way. Some thing should just be condemned. Period. And the thing that should be condemned is Hitler and anyone who associates in any way with him.

  52. loopygorilla says:

    @Eve

    call me cynical but thats what i believe about these people.

    they really do think they are above everyone else, so yeah, the fashion world will stay low, but in 1 or 2 yrs time, he will be “reborn” again.

    p.s he just got fired and i just read that on the newspaper in the uk that “the fashion industry is sending him its love and support and its hope he will find some help (probably rehab).”

    WHAT DID I JUST SAY 10 mins ago?

  53. Cheyenne says:

    AngelMay: Not defending the guy, he is big pals with Naomi Campbell which says it all.
    ============================================
    Actually, it says nothing. One can be personal friends with someone from a minority group and at the same time have racist attitudes against that same group.

    ____________________________________________

    @to: Since when is being a blatant bigot a normal part of growing up?

  54. Cheyenne says:

    @rosanna: I don’t know of anyone who defended Polanski’s actions. A grown man having sex with a 13 year old girl is despicable. What some people objected to is trying to prosecute him 40 years after the event, when his victim explicitly said she does not want him prosecuted and she forgave him for what he did to her. The question then becomes, should the victim have a say or not?

    What also made the DA’s prosecution suspect was the fact that the guy was up for re-election and needed a major case to ensure his re-election. So he jumped on the Polanski case since a child molestation case is guaranteed to stir up emotions. What the DA should have realized was that legally, if not morally, he was beating a dead horse.

  55. Bill Hicks is God says:

    @43, Sorry I can’t read your handle but ‘anonymous’ using the term is incorrect in any definition of blood money.

    In the instance of anti-semitic application, far as I know, Portman didn’t take 30 pieces of silver to hand Galliano over to be crucified (‘anonymous’ take note).

    What their post clearly tells me is that they don’t know what the hell they’re talking about. There are several definitions of blood money and clearly anonymous doesn’t understand any of them but that doesn’t necessarily mean its in the anti-semitic context. Certainly anti-semitism is ignorance; not all ignorance is anti-semitic.

    But we are talking about anti-semitism so of course people will read it from that angle. I didn’t. I didn’t think anti-semite. I thought “Somebody needs a dictionary. Next!”

    All things aside, it was one post so okay, I read one thing in this thread that could be construed as anti-semitic.

    I’m not going to tar them with any anti-semitic brush (yet) so why don’t we ask anonymous to explain why they chose that term?

    @Anonymous: why did you say “blood money” – Not the wisest term to use given the topic.

  56. Eve says:

    p.s he just got fired and i just read that on the newspaper in the uk that “the fashion industry is sending him its love and support and its hope he will find some help (probably rehab).”

    WHAT DID I JUST SAY 10 mins ago?

    @ Loopygorilla:

    Yup, I hear you. You see…I’m a cynical person myself — and very much. But I was hoping this time things would work out differently…because if this a**hole is given a pass then people like Mel Gibson can come up and say: “If you forgave him, why not me as well?”. Chills, chills.

  57. Sheena says:

    I feel that the best way to deal with people who reveal their bigotry and prejudice is to lampoon, ridicule, and laugh at them. This also applies to groups espousing dangerous and stupid ideas, such as creationism and religion in public schools.

  58. hatsumomo says:

    Goddamn, I remember there once was a time when Bill Hicks is God used to make some outrageous gut busting one-liners and now look at her! the sole voice of reason in a thread full of a**holes! Astonishing!

  59. DGO says:

    @loopygorilla – I hear you. What about what Armani said the other day? It was something to the effect that Gailliano must be under “distress” and that he was sorry he was taped without his knowledge. Sounds like, “Sorry you got caught, bud”, but not sorry that you’re an antisemite. I can see Armani or some other big name in the fashion industry quietly hiring Galliano. Disgusting on all counts.

  60. hatsumomo says:

    Is it still the same person posting?

  61. AngelMay says:

    I didn’t mean being friends with Naomi Campbell is a good thing! I meant it means the guy is an asshole & likes to hang with other assholes.

    If Dior wants to fire him, fine. But every actress associated with Dior doesn’t need to be tearing her hair out with guilt.

    After all, it’s not like Natalie married a guy who liked to parade around in Nazi regalia, hmmm, Sandra?

  62. TG says:

    @devilgirl and @Praisestangie – I agree with you both. Natalie is a hypocryte. Though this guy sounds like a jerk too. What I don’t understand is how do these people get so successful and far in their careers and then all of a sudden they are racists? Was he that way all along and just kept it hidden? I think some of these folks don’t live in reality. I live in a cosmopolitan area and there is no room for that kind of thinking in DC, I would think a fashion designer would be surrounded by all kinds of people and not hold such hatred in his heart. I couldn’t imagine making comments like that.

  63. Eve says:

    @ Cheyenne:

    I don’t know about Polanski’s victim forgiving him, but what I do know for sure is that she — as an adult woman — said (on a letter or something) that the case being re-opened and being brought up constantly caused more pain to herself and her family than the crime itself.

    I believe Polanski committed a hideous crime (with aggravating circumstances since he got her drunk and doped her) but the whole thing (his prosecution after all this time) and prison in Switzerland seemed more like a political thing as you say rather than people actually trying to punish a rapist. Had she (the victim, I repeat, now an adult woman) said she wanted him arrested, prosecuted, judged and sent to prison, then it would be a different story: I’d be the first to say let’s get him. But she asked the case to be dropped — and I respect that.

    And while all that fuzz regarding his arrest was happening, I read somewhere that around 10.000 rape kits in California weren’t even tested yet. I know Polanski’s face and I know what he did — and would never let a child next to him without surveillance. The men who perpetrated those crimes (the ones from the untested rape kits) are probably still free by now.

    P.S.: I’m not excusing Polanski’s behaviour in any way, but I also think that if we are to punish everybody then we should also question her mother’s actions: she brought her 13-year-old daughter to an adult’s party and let her go alone to a room with a man for taking pictures in hopes that that would help her daughter’s career.

  64. hellen says:

    Good for her, and good for Dior for firing him.

  65. lady of the lake says:

    Galliano should know that Hitler hated gays as well – stupid Galliano

  66. mia girl says:

    @23 Aside from the fact that hate speech is deplorable, Galliano is accused of saying these things in France where making anti-Semitic statements is against the law. So, he potentially committed a crime, twice no less, and hence why it’s a big deal.

    Further, to the many on this thread who are questioning Natalie Portman’s “pride” as a Jewish person… I am no “super fan” of hers, but did know before this article that she is Jewish, born in Israel and she has talked about her faith quite a bit. Perhaps you have not read many of her interviews.

    Plus, changing your name as evidence of not being proud of who you are is a pretty thin argument… you all know full well that many many entertainers change their names mostly at the insistence of industry folks who feel that their name need to be more palatable… i.e. Archibald Leech into Cary Grant; Alan Alda from Alphonso D’Abruzzo, Jon Stewart from Jonathon Leibowitz (and he certainly isn’t hiding his Jewish background!).

    Finally, NO, she does not need to give any money back to Dior. That’s ridiculous. If a vice president where you work spews hate speech, is suspended and then eventually fired for his actions, would YOU give back the money you have earned while working there? Of course not.

    Point is, hate on Portman if you want, her Polanski support can certainly give you cause for that, but in this case she was appropriates it releasing a statement and I believe her statements are sincere.

  67. Bill Hicks is God says:

    @Bobbie: Another poster quite rightly pointed out why nobody’s pants are on fire about Galliano’s “Asian” remark.

    I read somewhere somebody said the woman’s “Arab” companion. Given that “analysis”, I take Asian to mean someone whose ethinicity is from the Indian sub-continent.

    The British Raj starved millions of Indians. Their skeletons sold to medical schools for anatomy classes the world over.

    So, while the Holocaust is at the forefront of people’s minds, there have been many genocides an exterminations: The Irish (poor, white, nobody cares); The Scots in the Highland Clearances (poor, white, nobody cares); The Raj massacres & starvation (poor and brown, now nobody really cares); Rwanda (really poor and REALLY brown so nobody REALLY cares), the Armenians (“different,” “intelligensia,” -sound familiar? Not enough “numbers” so again, nobody cares).

    “Never Again,” right? Kosovo, Rwanda, the Congo. Eli Wiesel pulls his hair out over this and pointed out a much larger hypocrisy; one infinitely larger than what’s going on with a vapid actress and a design house.

    The hypocrisy is that the Holocaust shook the world, we’re supposed to learn something from what happened and we haven’t. What an injustice to those who perished.

    I admit, I digressed a little…

    Galliano is just a diarrheal drop in the bucket of manure that Portman totally chose to step in.

    She’s cherry-picking what outrages her. Obviously the rape of a 13 year-old doesn’t. I think that’s very telling of what kind of tit-head she really is and speaks volumes about her character.

  68. devilgirl says:

    You know, this is off topic a bit, but relating to Polanski. I do not care that his victim forgave him. HE BROKE THE LAW, and like a disgusting, guilty worm, he fled the country to avoid being punished.

    Do you think if all rape victims forgive their rapists, it is a good idea to not prosecute and insist on jail time. Let’s not forget the victim was a 13 yr old CHILD!

    I really shudder when I see people saying he paid for his crime. No he didn’t. It is disgusting that because he is a director, he should get a pass. It is stupid to think that because the person he raped forgave him, that the crime should go unpunished. Heck, maybe all rapists should get the sympathy of their victims and avoid jail time that way!

  69. Oenix says:

    @ Jen: “….If she was so proud of being Jewish, the marquee for Black Swan would have said “Starring Natalie Hershlag”….”

    So taking her Jewish grandmother’s maiden name (Portman) as a stage name instead of her Jewish father’s name (Hershlag) makes her less proud of being jewish???

    Since you’re trying so hard to be offended by Natalie, why don’t you go find another evidence to build your case.

  70. spinner says:

    Sounds like Galiano is an equal opportunity offender. He not only offended the Jews but also Italians & Asians. I am waiting to hear the outrage from the Asians & Italians.

    I think this man just hates everybody.

  71. BW says:

    Off subject a bit, but who’s the guy in the blue T-shirt with the sweat stains in the shape of owls?

    Oh, nevermind.

  72. Eve says:

    @ Devilgirl:

    I don’t know if your comment (# 68) is directed at me or Cheyenne. But I never said because the victim forgave him (since I clearly stated I didn’t know about that) he shouldn’t be prosecuted. I said the victim said quite recently that the case being re-opened and talked about nowadays brings more pain to her and her family than the crime itself.

    And no, I don’t think Polanski should be given a pass because he’s a top director. I just think that his prosecution after all this time was a political strategy, and the victim asking the case to be droped (for the reason above mentioned) was something to be considered and respected. I repeat, had she said she wanted him punished, I’d support the decision. Had she said she didn’t want him punished, just a few years after the crime, I would want him punished anyway. But she, now a forty-something woman, asked the case to be droped for a very good reason — the pain she feels now when people insist in talking about something that she claims she has overcome, not because she allegedly forgave him.

  73. Tess says:

    Back to Polanski for a sec….

    Once a crime is committed (like Polanski’s rape and sodomy of a minor) it is out of the victim’s hands to exonerate the criminal. Only the people (the jury) can deliver a not guilty verdict.

  74. Johnny Depp's Girl says:

    This disgusts me, truly. Prejudice of any sort is a disgusting and horrible practice and anyone who continues to live this way should be shunned for sure.

  75. Bill Hicks is God says:

    Hi Hatsumomo: “Is it still the same person posting?”

    If you mean me, yes it is. Celebitchy can confirm the IP and gossip boards terrify my boyfriend. He knows when he’s out of his league 😉 and being eaten alive isn’t at the top of his “to do” list.

    There’s a time for gut-busting one-liners but this isn’t it. I find nothing remotely funny about this topic or thread, so there it is.

  76. what?! says:

    what Olivia said.

  77. Obvious says:

    i think that we should only be bugging celebrities who work with him now. they most likely did not know his feelings when they worked with him in the past.

  78. celeducat'em says:

    agree with all. hypocrisy plain and simple. slam the anti-semite for voicing a drunken opinion versus defending the jew (and potential employer) who anally rapes a 13yr old. her logic proves what a waste, her ivy league education.
    and to repeat a former comment as it doesn’t seem to register with some, the raped girl- now woman- has no say in the prosecution. victims are notoriously unwilling to face their aggressor, particularly if they got paid off. allowing the rich to simply write checks for their horrid, criminal actions is not the spirit of our law.

  79. MNGIRL76 says:

    Off topic but-Is that a leather Chanel bag in the last photo? I thought she didn’t wear leather?
    At work can’t get to into the subject matter!

  80. Cheyenne says:

    Eve: she asked the case to be dropped — and I respect that.
    =============================================

    Excellent post and that is exactly what I am talking about. What Polanski did was reprehensible. But SHE was the victim here. And since she is now a grown woman, I believe her wishes should be respected.

    As you said, this is NOT about giving Polanski a pass. It’s about respecting the feelings of a victim of statutory rape who wants to put it behind her and get on with her life.

  81. Catherine says:

    The comments are more enlightening than the article here. Ms Portman is quite the contradiction, isn’t she?

  82. Camille says:

    I don’t care for Portman, but good for her (yes, she is a hyopcrite however). Will be interesting to see if other celebs follow suit.

  83. Heavenbound says:

    @ Hatsumomom

    I too second that Bill Hicks is God, use to crack me up so much! I always looked forward to her one-liners.

    I guess, she took some kind of hiatus, so welcome back! Although she has clearly stated this is not a funny topic, which I agree.

  84. geekylove says:

    Tess:

    To all the anti-semites so quick to accuse Portman of hypocrisy, taking “blood money,” etc: Get off it. Your motivation is painfully transparent.
    ***
    i don’t like natalie portman.* i think it’s hypocritical of her to judge one person, and not judge someone who is judged and sentenced (the fact IS polanski slept with a 13-year old). also, i do think that palestinians have the rigtht to their state.
    ***
    that said, i don’t judge people by color:i notice it in the way i notice someone’s eyes, teeth or any other physical trait; i’m really disgusted by the people who do that and i don’t think it’s better if discrimination is hidden in a subtle package.
    by the way, i’m 24, college educated girl, with a great,great guy that i love,from europe-and although slavic, my family has turkish, german, jewish (among many other) forefathers.
    what exactly in all of this, makes me an anti-semit???!!!!
    *closer was fantastic movie, and the role was made for her. 😉

  85. Brittany says:

    I’m not a huge fan of Natalie, but people are people and not everyone has their views completely set in stone… Whenever the Polanski stuff came back up, she was, what, 25 maybe? I’m 24 and my views change daily. And as for Natalie thinking child rape is ‘ok,’ do any of you REALLY believe she thinks that? Come on. She’s prob just as disgusted as the rest of us but didn’t denounce him publicly Bc she hoped to work with him someday Bc he is one of the greatest directors of our time.

  86. daisy424 says:

    @Bill:
    Thanks for the info, well stated.

  87. hannah says:

    Her support of Roman Polanski totally changed my opinion of her. It’s part of the reason I didn’t bother seeing Black Swan. I don’t know how she manages to work up the nerve to criticize anyone after coming out in support of a pedophile.

    By the way, the recidivism rate for pedophiles is something like 95% (or higher). I couldn’t care less whether his victim forgave him or not, hideous violent crimes should be punished, no matter how long it takes to catch the perpetrator.

  88. kiss me says:

    no one has anything to say about her sorry composition? crikey! talk about 6th grade English. i’m not even joking here. really! gross. pray this is the last time she’s asked for a statement about ANYthing.

  89. Frances says:

    Hang on, Natalie Portman is calling someone else racist? Natalie Portman, the uber-Zionist who says not a word about her birth country’s appalling crimes against the Palestinian people? Who proudly allies herself with that revolting racist creep Alan Dershowitz? Too bad she couldn’t have been deeply shocked and disgusted by the corpses of Palestinian children incinerated during Israel’s White Phosphorus Jamboree.

    **
    So long, John. Don’t let the door hit you on your way out.