John Mayer is texting Jennifer Aniston and getting ignored


An older photo of Jennifer Aniston and John Mayer together on 5/10/08. Credit: Fame
Yesterday the Daily Mail ran an “exclusive” story that we covered that claimed that Jennifer Aniston had drunk dialed John Mayer because she wanted a reconciliation and that he was responsive to her and the two have been talking every day since. It pretty much sounded like BS, and the Daily Mail is about as reliable, or maybe less so, than Star Magazine. The main thing they’re pretty good at is spotting female celebrities’ tiny body flaws, minor weight gain, and knobby knees. If a female celebrity has gained 5 pounds or lost enough weight to make her knees protrude, it’s enough for a long story expounding on it in the Mail.

In Touch, another unreliable source but much more trustworthy than the Mail, says that it’s the other way around – Mayer has been sending Jennifer text messages in that pseudo-intellectual style of his. He’s only managed to raise a smirk out of Aniston, though, who just hits delete and moves on to do more yoga, eat a chicken salad, and top it off with some Smart Water.

John Mayer has been battling the blues since his August breakup with Jennifer Aniston, and now she’s ignoring him. “He tried reaching out to Jen with text messages, but she never responded,” an insider tells In Touch. “He was really hurt that she didn’t want to talk to him.” To make matters worse, the former playboy, 30, was spotted at La Esquina restaurant in NYC on September 13 striking out with the ladies. “He loves being noticed by women,” the insider says. But an onlooker added, “No one seemed interested in him that night. He didn’t look very happy.”

[From In Touch, print edition, October 6, 2008]

Now this version of events I believe. The only evidence we have that Aniston is the needy person the media portrays her as are the few interviews she did after the breakup of her five year marriage, which was over three years ago. Mayer, on the other hand, pretty much proves that he’s a douche who needs attention every time he opens his passive aggressive mouth or pens a blog entry.

Aniston seemed like an idiot for hooking up with Mayer in the first place, but she earns points for breaking it off and moving on.

 

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

51 Responses to “John Mayer is texting Jennifer Aniston and getting ignored”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. geronimo says:

    Oh FFS. Don’t care which one is doing it, the fact that both of them feel the need to inform the world about it and have the last word is just beyond pathetic. Not a mouse-sized shit do I give here. Just go away.

  2. Ssshush says:

    Oh please stop it you guys!

    Just change your number and move on already Jen!

    No matter which rumor is true, I’d rather see Jen alone, free & single than with that ugly dude useing Jen for publicity!

  3. Kaiser says:

    Yeah, I called it. Yesterday’s story came from Mayer. Today’s story is coming from Aniston’s camp.

    All of it is unbelievably pathetic.

  4. anony says:

    “moves on to do more yoga, eat a chicken salad, and top it off with some Smart Water.”

    _*Claps* .That was hilarious. I can see her breezy day scheduled just like that. Then strolling on the beach and popping in to Courteney’s pad for some mid day glasses of wine.

  5. Karen says:

    In Touch would have gone to print days ago, certainly before the Daily Mail story, so it’s not in retaliation. Us Weekly ran a story this week also about how John is sad and lonely and depressed and all that crap and Jennifer has moved on.

  6. Kaiser says:

    It’s not the timeline, Karen, it’s the back-and-forth between two people who don’t have the talent to ceed the spotlight to their careers. Instead they continue on this immature PR strategy.

  7. Codzilla says:

    Sorry to state the obvious, but John Mayer is a f*cking ass hat.

  8. daisy424 says:

    Leave it to Codzilla to be the voice of sanity :D I agree :D

  9. Linda says:

    Kaiser – I think the point Karen was trying to get across is that it’s NOT Jen’s camp volleying the ball back and forth. It’s the magazines that do this and they do this kind of stuff to get people to buy their magazine. See all the Brangeloonie’s will buy the magazine that shows Jen as a pathetic loser and all the people who like Jen will buy the magazine showing John Mayer as pathetic – the Jessica Simpson fans will also buy the John Mayer is pathetic.

    It’s all part of magazine sales – just like Brangelina is breaking up in one and another magazine have them looking to grow the family and hunting for the 7th child…

    It’s a fairly common practice and I think that was the point Karen was getting across. Although I know that many people love to buy into Lainey’s theories that Jen has her PR people do this – Karen clearly shows that the timeline on this one makes it impossible.

  10. Kaiser says:

    Yeah, Linda, I’m pretty sure I understand the basics of the tabloid press.

    My point was that after the horrible fallout from the Mayer/Aniston break-up – in which both of their PR teams were giving info to the tabloids – it’s more than likely that both Aniston and Mayer are still giving info about who’s over whom, and who’s calling, etc.

  11. ff says:

    So this is kind of proof that her ‘people’ keep an eye on the stories in the tabloid press and then make sure there’s always ‘tat’ for any ‘tit’.

    I just find it weird that she can’t let some of this stuff go. It seems like the break up had acrimony somewhere along the line if they have to keep having ‘the last word’ on something most people are, frankly, tired of hearing about.

  12. Karen says:

    Thank you Linda. Exactly my point, but you are so eloquent.

  13. Linda says:

    Kaiser – you say that understand tabloid press, yet continue to say that it is Aniston and Mayer giving out information… o.k. – that’s logical! Please, spare me your bias of Jennifer Aniston.

  14. pamela says:

    At this rate, no one will want to date Aniston, because God forbid they break up with her, the guy will be lambasted in the tabloids and blogs.

  15. daisy424 says:

    Linda, spare us your obvious hatred of AJ. Pull up past threads on her to see that.
    I see the point Kaiser is making, you’re too obsessed with your bias for JA to see it.
    Play nice now :D

  16. Karen says:

    Well Kaiser, you’re obviously not a Jennifer fan, so I could care less what you think of this post, but bottom line is:

    Jennifer had many, many interviews at the Toronto Film Festival and in not one did she talk about John Mayer or elude to their relationship. You’ll find them on You Tube if you’re at all interested or on Jennifer’s fan site. Mr. Mayer, on the other hand called a press conference to discuss the breakup at length.

    Last night on Access Hollywood an editor for People called him no class because he talks about his ex girlfriendsm and that he does, and the Daily Mail article was given out by John Mayer himself, in my humble opinion. I doubt there’s a word of truth in it.

  17. geronimo says:

    Linda – you only have to look back at the pathetic ‘he said, she said’ rebuttals that went on when they broke up to know that info was being fed to the tabs by both parties. Whether it’s true or not in this particular case is completely beside the point. They’ve already established their MO. It’s no surprise that people automatically see this as more of the same pathetic attention-seeking onemanupship.

  18. KERRI says:

    @Karen: JA does not “kiss and tell”. That’s what her camp have always said about her. She’s a classy lady. BUT….

    She has her “sources” do her dirty work, and she comes out clean and smelling like a rose.

    The rose has many thorns and it is dying. We’re onto her little pathetic childish games. Grow-up, have your baby and GO AWAY!!!!

  19. Kaiser says:

    Thank you Daisy, Geronimo, Kerri and Pamela – it’s always good to know there are some people who don’t buy into this pathetic Pity Party.

  20. Linda says:

    Daisy, et. al.

    This is almost laughable coming from you!!! I won’t even bother to debate the issue further after reading how “Princess Z” will one day rule the world and her doll should come with crowns, etc. Talk about over the top adoration…

    I’m not the person putting Jennifer up on a pedestal…unlike you and the rest of the badettes who have AJ and “her angels” (puke) up so high…

    Again, thanks for making my point about how biased (and petty) you truly are…

  21. Orangejulius says:

    Geronimo: Not a mouse-sized shit do I give here. Love it! I’m going to be using that one….

  22. someone says:

    This story is so much more believeable, John misses all the attention he got when he was with Jennifer…

  23. daisy424 says:

    Linda; Our ‘adoration’ of the Jolie/Pitt kids is simply old fashioned fun, something you don’t understand I guess. :roll:
    I could care less about JA and don’t think my comments for her are mean except for when I saw her wearing a Cubs cap in yesterdays thread.
    Now, the following comment you made is over the top adoration;

    “…..I didn’t realize her love for Chicago extended to the Cubs – makes me like her even more!!! ”

    Thanks for making my point,have a great day 8)

  24. Kaiser says:

    …and we’re commenting on a gossip site called Celebitchy. Throwing around a word like “bias” like we’re all supposed to have unbiased journalistic integrity? :roll:

  25. pamela says:

    Kaiser and daisy, it always amazes me how the Aniston’s fans are quick to call posters “hypocrites” and “bias” at the first criticism of her, but when there is a post up about the Jolie-Pitts, they are the first ones on here calling them all kinds of names.

    This woman stirs all kinds of rancor because of the way she has conducted herself. Say what you want about AJ, but what you see is what you get. JA is so hung-up on her image that it is imperative to her that anything negative is immediately shot down. And people are beginning to pay attention, and call her out on it. She is 39 years old, almost 40 and needs to start acting her age. Even Lindsay Lohan at this point, acts more mature than this woman. Pathetic.

  26. journey says:

    the difference between the ja fan club and the badettes? a sense of humor. the badettes have one. the jen fans tend more toward melodramatic soap opera. :?

  27. pamela says:

    journey, Exactly. I remember the first time I visited this site, it was so much fun reading the posters (badettes) comments on the JPs. And then the haters invaded and sucked all the fun out of the thread.

  28. RAN says:

    Interestingly enough… I thought this was a post about Jennifer Aniston, which has, yet again, turned into a we hate you Jen and Jen fans because we love Angelina Jolie. Please. It really is the outside of reality.

    Better stop posting now.. time to see a therapist since only those who adore AJ have a sense of humor :roll:

    And.. odd for me – I’m no pal of Kaiser’s, but for the most part, she’s pretty level about these posts lately and is certainly not the problem. It’s the newer folks who just insist on turning this website into trash talking crap — let it go people. It’s all fun and games until someone loses an eye.

  29. DD says:

    lol, I love the conspiracy theories about JA, the pity party stuff etc., she seems like the most normal woman and not at all like the way some of you portray her to be. Hehe, I don’t get it.
    Other than that one interview in Vanity Fair I haven’t seen her really out their talking about any of her other relationships and personally I don’t blame her, Brad Pitt was an insensitive asshole with his timing of things. That whole W spread crap with AJ and the fake kids made me want to hurl for her, and seriously brought down the level of respect I had for the both of them especially AJ, since I guess I idolized her b4 this whole nonsense. No tact there, and I’m not a BP – AJ hater by the way. They are doing plenty of good things. Just calling them out on the stupidity of that one. Whether they cheated or not I don’t care, it happens all the time, but flaunting it like that was gross and a huge slap across the face for JA. I think thats why the media loves this triangle that they never let die.

  30. pamela says:

    And…..here they come, like clockwork. LOL.

  31. RAN says:

    Stop trying to ruin this website for people who actually like to discuss Jennifer Aniston – she has fans (it’s not a surprise), she always has.

    For someone who ‘can’t stand’ JA, there are 4 posts on here from the exact same person. In addition to that… after my comment, there will surely be a 5th. THAT, my friends, is a weird obsession 8O

    And… let me just clarify… I’m not a “fan” either way. I think the woman is harmless and minds her business – hardly deserving of the condemnation that she receives, but that is the nature of the ‘biz’, so…whatever. However, her diehard fans are entitled to their opinion – same as AJ fans.

  32. pamela says:

    “Who the cap fits”. LOL

    Oh wait, I have another one,” kettle meet pot”.

  33. vdantev says:

    Texting each other is the new equivalent to sticking notes on their locker.

  34. RAN says:

    Didn’t take long for that 5th post to come up :lol:

    Dante – good point.

  35. Lola says:

    You would think that a Brangelina ardent fan would know better about tabloid fabrication. Unless of course they also think that the Brangelina camp put out all those ‘the best mother in world/best father in the world/split stories/ rainbow family stories for PR and to keep in the news. Or do they? :?:

    Is there are reason why Brangelina rabid fans rush to make comments on a woman who they say is so boring they can’t stand her? There are more comments from them that anyone else.

  36. dumdee says:

    why are we even talking about angelina spread my legs jolie. and why are the brangeloonies trashing our dear beloved jen? welll… i was thinking, if you guys hate “pity” so much, maybe you guys shouldnt even open this thread and read about poor “papparazi loving pity party”. then maybe you guys can keep your mouths shut and we can carry on loving our jen while you guys go on loving your angie. and touche lola!

  37. jona says:

    lol i doubt john mayer is sad and depressed about loosing jennifer aniston. everyone else has had her so it isn’t like he is missing out on anything. she changes men like a baby changes diapers.
    i really doubt he is texting her. why text when you can call, if he isn’t calling then i doubt he is texting.

  38. karma says:

    oh! look who’s talking!? maybe you forgot how your dear Angie loves to sleep with both men and women..f**king every person she has work with, married or not!

  39. DD says:

    Hey Pamela, were you referring to my post as here they come again? As I said I have no love or hate for JA, BP. I really thought AJ was awesome but not so much anymore either. Is it that you don’t like criticism any kind whatsoever for AJ and BP, but criticism for JA is okay? I still adore AJ, but it doesn’t mean she’s god or hasn’t done anything stupid. Aren’t you capable of an unbiased opinion? Thanks.

  40. House Mouse says:

    I think that she’s so over him. He was cheap and rinning after (fame) paparazzi.

    I don’t see them back together.

  41. Kaiser says:

    See, RAN (I know, we basically promised to ignore each other, but you brought me up FIRST :D ), most of my disgust of Aniston is that she is *not* harmless – I think she actively sends her publicity people out to try to destroy and misinform people – first Brad and Angelina, currently John Mayer.

    After Aniston and Mayer broke up, I had new-found respect for him because he actually had the balls to talk to the press directly and say he broke up with her, and to list his “reasons” – contradicting of all the crap that came out of her camp.

    Just my “biased” opinion… :lol:

  42. RAN says:

    Kaiser, you’ve made my point. Without a doubt, I see your point – don’t have to agree with it, but I see it. Even better than that, you are more than entitled to your opinion and to express it. As is everyone else on every other thread – whether it be about the hypocrisy of Brangelina or the dislike of Aniston.

    The problems come up when all these looney tunes start posting their vile irrational hate, just to antagonize the other posters. You’re funny, amusing for the most part, and seemingly intelligent. I can’t say the same for some of the other weirdos who I’ve agreed to disagree with. For them, it’s a weird obsession – which quite frankly, disgusts me.

    One more thing Kaiser, I didn’t bring you up to drag you into the conversation… I brought you up because I didn’t think you were the one being an a@@hole. While you don’t need my defense at any time, I thought it was stupid that you were targeted and I wanted to point out that you weren’t the issue in this thread.

  43. Gia says:

    I TOTALLY 100% AGREE WITH KEISER! Steven Huvane is the Pit Bull of all Pit Bull PR Reps in the business and he is Aniston’s man Joie has NEVER, EVER had a PR “handler” and convinced Brad to drop his too once they got together and said let truth speak for itself, good and bad. That is WHY this “love tiangle” has played out for so long and all in Aniston’s favor as she had a SPIN DOCTOR ON IT AT ALL TIMES. The Jolie-Pitts recently hired a known political/Charitable/Pr advisor type since Holly Goline’s identity was fraudulently used to report that false twin birth story and they decided they needed to protect their people and he does help advise them on their many charitable donations…including the $3 Million donated just in the last two weeks.

    And I also applaud John Mayer for not taking the Steven Huvane attack and sack of lies being spread by Huvane on Aniston’s behalf. Oh yeah, she does play dirty but keeps her hands clean personally. She pays others to do her dirty work bu they do what she wants done! He did not call a press conference to make his comments about Aniston, he adressed the papparazzi following him from the gym!

    Run John, Run…don’t look back!

  44. vdantev says:

    Karma’s just pissed because she/he/it/they don’t have lovers knocking down their door to bed them 24/7.

  45. zagge says:

    Stop now.Every star make the same so people not forget they. love you jen :x

  46. RAN says:

    Gia, the difference between you and some others is that you irrationally state these items as fact – as if you KNOW them to be true. This is the type of stuff that comes off as ridiculous. You may ‘think’ it, but you know nothing about these people for a fact.

    Linda and Karen, since zagge’s comment drew me back, I thought I should mention that I wasn’t picking on you earlier. It may have sounded like that since I was kind of defending Kaiser, but I agree with both of your perspectives. Hope you didn’t take offense.

  47. smilesalot says:

    PEOPLE WHO THE HELL CARES ABOUT THIS STUFF! i heard that they both passed gas too! Get A Life. :roll:

  48. RAN says:

    Smilesalot – you get a life! If you don’t care, then run along and enjoy your “life”. None of us REALLY care ffs – we’re just having fun on our favorite site. Get lost