Daniel Craig left his ex Satsuki Mitchell devastated, “absolutely bewildered”

wenn2304840

The last we heard of Daniel Craig and Rachel Weisz, a random passerby had declared them “sexier than Brangelina” which you guys debated exhaustively last Friday. Previously, we had talked about their “whirlwind” romance (which seemed to have begun while both Rachel and Daniel were “with” other people, and we also heard about how much Daniel really, really wanted to marry Rachel, which I thought was incredibly hot.) Anyway, a few days ago, The Daily Mail had an interesting piece about Daniel and Rachel, and the people left in the wake of their hot, sexy romance. The Mail spoke to the father of Satsuki Mitchell, who was engaged to Daniel for several years, and the whole article is full of interesting background on Daniel and Rachel. Did you know that Rachel was a radical feminist at university? Did you know that for the most part, Rachel likes, according to friends, “a bit of rough” in her men? You can read the whole exhaustive thing here, and here are some highlights:

The whole [wedding] event, which apparently was followed by a quiet meal and an early night, was carried out amid the sort of secrecy of which 007 himself would no doubt have been proud. But it has not exactly gone down well with friends of 43-year-old Daniel Craig back home. They are miffed, it seems, that the first they learnt of the nuptials was when the actor’s Los Angeles-based PR Robin Baun put out a terse statement last weekend confirming that they had taken place.

One long-time actor friend of Chester-born Craig, who has worked regularly with him – and shared more than a few of the drunken nights to which the Bond star is occasionally partial – told the Mail this week: ‘Frankly, I think it’s a bit much he couldn’t let his old pals know. I really don’t understand why he feels the need for all this cloak-and-dagger silliness.’

Unofficially, those surrounding the new Mr and Mrs Bond were letting it be known this week that the pair had decided on a low-key event ‘out of respect for their previous partners’.

Which does seem rather strange, given that according to the camps of both Craig and Miss Weisz they only began their affair after splitting with their respective long-term exes. Why, then, the need for such secrecy? Perhaps it has something to do with the whirlwind nature of their race up the aisle – at the first hint of hasty nuptials, many would assume that the bride was already expecting. Could that be why Miss Weisz was so eager to become Mrs Craig? Whatever the case, few can deny that things have been moving at warp speed for the couple who have only been officially dating for six months.

Craig’s now ex-fiancée Satsuki Mitchell – a 32-year-old Hollywood producer – is said to be ‘absolutely bewildered’ at the pace at which he and Miss Weisz have formalised their fledgling relationship.

Her own six-year romance with him netted her nothing more permanent than the consolation prize of an admittedly impressive Cartier diamond engagement ring he presented her with in 2007. While some of her circle in LA were letting it be known this week that the Japanese-American Miss Mitchell had stoically moved on, her father Christopher confessed to the Mail this week that her emotions remain very much on the raw side. So much so, in fact, that she can’t bear to hear mention of Craig’s name.

‘His sudden marriage came out of nowhere,’ Mr Mitchell told us. ‘We heard about it like everyone else, by reading the newspapers. She doesn’t mention his name now and tells me off if I do. Satsuki has only just reached a happy place. She has since said, more than once, that the break-up was the best thing for her. She knew he was not the man she wanted him to be and there was something wrong in the relationship.’

Mr Mitchell said that Craig and his daughter had been house-hunting in New York when the relationship started to unravel early last year, although all must have appeared well when, a few months later in May 2010, the couple bought a £1million penthouse in Manhattan’s trendy TriBeCa. Satsuki showed obvious strain after the split and her father says she was so upset that her weight plummeted, even prompting him to ask if she was suffering from an eating disorder.

‘I have suggested to her on a number of occasions that she might have one,’ he said. ‘Yet whenever we’re together she eats like a horse.’

Her devastation is hardly surprising, perhaps, given that she is said to have considered London-born Rachel a friend, after the two women spent time together on the Canadian set of the upcoming horror film Dream House last year, in which Weisz stars with Craig.

Satsuki, who also shared Craig’s £4 million home close to London’s Regent’s Park, is said to have discounted rumours circulating on set that the leading man and lady had become close. Members of the crew were already whispering that 41-year-old Miss Weisz, the star of the blockbuster movie franchise The Mummy, had fallen ‘head-over-heels’ for her rugged-looking screen love interest.

However, Craig is said to have insisted to the willowy Satsuki that he was nothing more than good friends with Rachel, whom he has known for ten years.

While Rachel Weisz’s spokesman was insisting her relationship with Aronofsky, director of this year’s Oscar-winning Black Swan, had been over for several months, in an interview just weeks earlier he had given no indication that all was not well between the couple. The bespectacled filmmaker has since moved out of the five-storey townhouse the couple shared in New York’s fashionable East Village — and it’s reported he’s gone from their London home, too — while Weisz has remained with their little boy.

Despite the split, sources close to Weisz and Aronofsky insist they are determined to stay on friendly terms for the good of their son, of whom they have agreed to share custody.

This week Rachel, who has recently been talking nostalgically about returning from New York to live in the UK, has had workmen refitting her £3 million North London home amid reports the couple are about to move in. They are also said to be looking for a six-acre property on the south coast as a holiday retreat. Just the sort of out-of-the-way place that would be ideal for the reluctant Bond, his new wife and the family they may be about to start.

[From The Mail]

Did you get all that? Satsuki is pissed and hurt. And whatever was going on between Rachel and Daniel, they were lying to their partners about it while they were working together, and everything fell apart shortly after the movie ended. While I have sympathy for Satsuki, I also tend to think… meh, whatever. She can claim that the split was the “best” thing for her and everything, but at the end of the day, she still got to nail Daniel Craig for five years, and that’s got to be one of highlights of any woman’s life. The more I read about Rachel and Daniel, the more I feel like they were just two forces of nature coming together, exploding with each other. HOT. Oh, and I guess the British papers are just out-right claiming that Rachel is pregnant too. Eh, she probably is!

wenn2630686

wenn2280545

wenn5642567

Photos courtesy of WENN.

 

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

143 Responses to “Daniel Craig left his ex Satsuki Mitchell devastated, “absolutely bewildered””

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Len says:

    ok, I don’t get it, celebitchy. How are they HOT and Jennifer Aniston is a homewrecker? Please explain.

  2. Zombie Nurse says:

    Apparently Rachel and Daniel used to date almost 20 years ago.

  3. Sloane Wyatt says:

    These two don’t do it for me. meh on Craig and Weisz. whatever

  4. Pyewacket says:

    How can she be knocked up when she signed on for the Bourne movie which begins filming late August, early September?

  5. Elizabeth says:

    I just think its a bad omen for Weiss/ Craig relationship to leave such carnage in its wake. You know the old saying that if someone cheats once (or abruptly walks out for “something better/ destiny”, etc.), then they’ll do it again. And how do we know this wasn’t just rebound for Weiss and Craig?? Not such a good sign.

  6. Shay says:

    I don’t understand why they’d be ‘hotter’ than Brangelina. Condoning lies isn’t hot, so in that sense even Brangelina aren’t hot either.
    Really bad form to get your meat where you get your bread and act like you’re a friend before you cut the grass.
    Women that do that are bitches. Rachel has revealed what she is. No huge surprise. Actors tend to have enlarged egos.

  7. Nat says:

    @ Len

    You took the words right out of my mouth! Thank you!!!

    P.S. I’m neither Weisz nor Aniston’s fan

  8. lin234 says:

    Ouch. That has to hurt. She’s probably been retracing the last few months in her mind before the break-up looking for clues as to when Craig and Weiss actually started dating again. I really feel bad for her. Especially since he’s a movie star, his image will be popping up randomly all over the place.

  9. OtherChris says:

    People cheat and it sucks. I was dumped when I was engaged and the guy married the womean (postscript: They’re still married and miserable). I don’t think it made him a bad person. I think it meant he made a bad decision. There are better ways to end a relationship.

    Yes, there are better ways to go about things, but everyone involved in this situation will survive and they’ll be better off for it.

  10. tapioca says:

    “the pair had decided on a low-key event ‘out of respect for their previous partners’.”

    So definite cross-over then! If you finish one relationship before you start another then you have a clear conscience as everybody’s moved on, Hey presto – Wedding of your dreams!

    Daniel Craig still gives me the “mehs” though.

  11. sandy says:

    @Len to get why Jennifer Aniston is a homewrecker and this couple not we’ve to travel back in time and talk about the unholy Bermuda triangle. After reading such an exhaustive piece from Daily mail i dont think am ready for that yet.

  12. Quest says:

    For Daniel to be engaged so long to Satsuki and not marry says a lot. And then to break it off and marry someone else could never be a great feeling. But,Rachel and Daniel have this unforgetable historical chemistry and I think he got a second opportunity to be with Rachel and he took it seriously. Look how fast he made it happen, he was so hot for Rachel.

    I honestly like the pairing

  13. Ponytail says:

    Quote : One long-time actor friend of Chester-born Craig…told the Mail this week: ‘Frankly, I think it’s a bit much he couldn’t let his old pals know. I really don’t understand why he feels the need for all this cloak-and-dagger silliness.’
    Hmm, maybe because you’re the sort of person who talks about your famous friend to the Mail ?

  14. saintdevil says:

    I agree that they are a hot couple and so are Brangelina.

    But I also think it’s ok for the S.O. who is left behind to feel devastated and hurt and not be ok with being lied to and cheated on even years later and that this is not something they deserve to be ridiculed for.

  15. Kaiser says:

    I’ve never said that this Craig-Weisz pairing isn’t sketchy as hell. I’ve just said that they’re so hot together, I don’t care. Plus, neither Rachel nor Daniel has ever spent six years milking an endless pity party over “homewreckers” that we can throw in their faces. I judge people by their own standards.

  16. Jenny says:

    To avoid being a homewrecker, there seem to be certain things to have. One is a publicist with direct ties to People Magazine who writes about your fabulous new relationship almost on a daily basis and skirt or totally ignore the “cheating” aspect becuase you are finally happy. The other is to be “hot and sexy” and send stories about being “hotter” than another famous couple to blogs who drool over the story and you. The other is to have a little known ex so that no one knows who the hell got dumped and therefore, the “nobody who is the ex” gets kicked to the curb without much fanfare or sympathy since they don’t have great publicits and have to resort to tacky stories in places like the tackier Daily Mail.

    Both of these two new couples should have to be scrutinized for years like others have been because of their somewhat shady beginnings (no proof though, so who really knows, but that didn’t stop other couples from being trashed for years), but won’t be, maybe because of the reasons above. In any case, none of the folks involved does a thing for me, so live and let live.

  17. Addie says:

    ANY form of cheating is never ok, no matter who the couple is.

    Is it THAT hard to break up with someone first before getting together with someone you feel is a better companion and better suited to you? Wouldn’t it avoid a whole lot of unnessesary drama?

  18. teehee says:

    …Beautiful woman (his ex)

  19. Len says:

    How exactly did Jennifer Aniston milk the homewrecker-thing? In those six years she probably devoted about three sentences total on the whole thing. She kept her head held high and moved on. It’s the press who didn’t. Really, I don’t care for Jennifer Aniston, but I just don’t see it.

  20. Esmom says:

    @10 totally agree with you on the “mehs.” I have never gotten his appeal at all. His facial features look sort of embryonic (it’s the only word I can think of to describe them), not even remotely attractive.

  21. brin says:

    I feel bad for Satsuki, he should have been honest with her. Having said that, I do think Craig-Weisz are hot.

  22. Chloe says:

    @ Len

    Jennifer Aniston spent the last 6 years pointing fingers, so now she’s getting the same treatment.

    That aside, I do believe it’s painful to find out that you were not the love of someone else’s live by seeing them move on immediately. I also don’t understand why is it so hard for all those people to simply break up with their partners first.

    My sympathy doesn’t extend to JA because she publicly admitted (correcting a journalist who called Pitt the love of her life) that Pitt was not the “love of her life” but “a love in her life” while still married to the dude.

    In short, Aniston gets bashed for her displays of hypocrisy after having played her “holier than thou” card for too many years.

  23. Praise St. Angie! says:

    “they were lying to their partners about it while they were working together, and everything fell apart shortly after the movie ended.”

    like other couples that will remain nameless.

    here’s the difference for most people, though, I think…

    Weisz and Craig apparently had the hots for each other 20 years ago and never made it happen so this relationship/marriage is like a cheesy love story – “the one that got away” now has another chance. I think that’s why people are (sort of) overlooking the whole cheating aspect. doesn’t make it right, but it does sort of explain it.

    but, like the other couples, NO ONE KNOWS FOR SURE exactly what happened other than those involved. and what they say to the public may or may not be 100% accurate.

  24. Len says:

    So, this Satsuki person really shouldn’t complain because she got to nail a hot person for five years..So I guess Justin Theroux isn’t hot. And Jennifer Aniston milked a pity-party by not getting into a serious relationship for six years. And when she did, she wrecked a home, unlike Rachel Weisz, who is HOT!!
    I am so lost here…

  25. Len says:

    @Chloe, seriously, In which way did she point fingers? In interviews? I really only recall about one sentence in a Vanity Fair interview, which wasn’t even that harsh considering what happened but which was of course planted on the cover. Other than that, I seriously don’t recall any specific finger pointing. Again, please explain.

  26. Chloe says:

    @ Len

    No Len, once again: cheating isn’t cool (if / when it happens – and whether it does or did, only the parties involved know, I’m not judging, regardless if we’re talking about Aniston / Theroux or these guys here).

    But cynically victimizing yourself for years in public will get you some criticism if you end up in a relationship with a suspicious chronology.

    It’s as simple as that.

    __________

    edit: Okay, since you’re asking, I’m gonna re-post something from a week ago:

    Here’s a short digest of how JA is NOT MARKETING her divorce. All it took was one google search, I’m too lazy to go through more. I tried to pick only the authorized interviews.

    Vanity Fair, 2005
    Jen Finally Talks. And Talks and Talks. And Cries. And Talks.

    Okay, that’s her right. But HERE’S WHERE IT SHOULD HAVE STOPPED. HOWEVER, WE GET:

    Entertainment Weekly, December 2008
    [cover]Jen’s fresh start: candid, confident and so over gossip, Jennifer Aniston moves on.

    Vogue, December 2008
    [cover]Jennifer Aniston: What Angelina did was very uncool

    GQ December 2008
    [inside] “we all go away to The Hamptons on the weekends,” jokes Aniston. “That’d be hysterical: I’ve got Zahara on my hip, and Knox …

    Marie Claire, March, 2009
    [inside] I still have the cassette tapes of messages from my first boyfriend (..) my husband… it’s like saving love letters.

    Cosmopolitan, May 2009
    [cover] Why THIS is the BEST time of my life.

    Elle, April 2009
    [cover]Face to face with Jennifer Anniston: “Why I have no regrets”

    Vogue (Italian edition) April 2009
    [cover] Jennifer Aniston: Quella Volta Che Angelina. L’Ultimo (finito) amore, l’affetto Per Brad, La rivale, I 40 Anni Prima intervista a cuore aperto (Davvero)

    (my Italian is very rusty so I’m not gonna translate but the key words are easily recognizable)

    Harper’s Bazaar, May 2010
    [cover] Jennifer Aniston: “It’s time for my rebirth”

    People, Jan 2010
    [cover] 5 years after Brad: Fun, flirty & 40! Happier, hotter than ever, she’s loving the single life – AND her sexy nights out with Gerard Butler

    People, February 2011
    [cover] Jen’s Most Revealing Interview Ever! Over coctails and girl talk the world’s most misunderstood star sets the record straight: I’m happy, Really.

    also, this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ov47W2LPIRg

    —————–

    That’s what I had in mind. (Sorry for going off-topic but I was asked for specifics)

  27. olivia says:

    Craig + Weisz =boredom

    @Chloe:
    here is what Aniston said about Pitt:

    Asked how it feels to have found the love of her life, Aniston offers a rather cryptic answer: “Is he the love of my life? I think you’re always sort of wondering, ‘Are you the love of my life?’ I mean, I don’t know, I’ve never been someone who says, ‘He’s the love of my life.’ He’s certainly a big love in my life.” She pauses. “And I know that we have something special, especially in all this chaos. In this nutty, brilliant, wonderful, hard business that we have, it’s nice to have somebody who’s anchored and knows you, really knows all of you.”

    http://www.wmagazine.com/celebrities/archive/jennifer_aniston_feb_2003?currentPage=5

  28. hmmhmm says:

    @ Len, I agree.

    I don’t understand why it’s ok for this couple because they’re hot. So, I assume that it’s ok that they’re hot, had a fling 20 years ago and dumped their long term/baby daddys at the emotional expense of others? Having sex with someone you think is sexy is not the same when love, or claim to be if they were engage. There’s nothing hot about this mess.

  29. Len says:

    Thank you Chloe, you’ve just proven my point. You’ve just given 2 exact quotes from Jennifer on the matter. The rest is about enjoying her life and moving on, what is wrong with that??? What do you want from her then? And if you think those last two people-covers are her words then I think you don’t understand tabloid-journalism.

  30. Len says:

    @Chloe. I’m rereading your post and you really don’t understand how magazines work. A journalist ask you: any regrets in your life? And when you answer no, which most people would, it ends up on the cover out of context, like this.

  31. Chloe says:

    Yeah, Olivia, that’s exactly what I mean. A “cryptic” answer about how nice it is to be with someone.

    But I guess everyone will interpret it differently. In the end, we’ll never know.

  32. nnn says:

    I have only one thing to say. Daniel Craig is neither hot not beautiful. When you are hot, you are also hot on your own and that picture of him with his ex girlfriend showed an average looking couple with neither of them upstaging the other.

  33. Susan says:

    I suspect this whole thing is just another brilliant fabrication made up to get massive amounts of PR.

    Especially since Brad and Angie have become such a domestic snoozefest.

    I could care less who this dude is boning.

  34. Riana says:

    Hot my ass. Cheating is disgusting and hypocrisy is simple.

    I always feel anyone who buys into the ‘forces that can’t be apart’ argument with cheaters curls up to Harlequin’s more than they’d like to admit.

    I used to respect Rachel but these actions show there’s a certain amount of immaturity and selfishness which consumes her.

  35. Jaded says:

    No wonder Satsuki is reeling. I had that done to me – guy I’d gotten serious with for a couple of years suddenly dumped me without a reason, disappeared, none of his friends or family would tell me where he was other than “somewhere in California”, and 6 weeks later he married someone else that he’d been seeing while he was still with me. That took a long time to get over, I was devastated so I feel for her.

  36. Chloe says:

    Len:
    “What do you want from her then?”

    To talk less, and maybe make some decent movies. She could simply *not* give so many interviews on her personal life and just nip all that in the bud.

    But, to be honest, I’m not that bothered by JA’s existence and I don’t have the JA hate within me that you probably think I do:) I just mildly enjoy mocking her on a gossip site, not because of what she is (I have no idea what she is) but what she or her PR people are trying to sell her as.

    And back to the topic, yeah, I do feel sorry for the dumped ones. Been there, done that.

  37. zesty says:

    Hypocrisy runs rampant around Hollywood. I’m with Len and hmmhmm on this one.

  38. Len says:

    @Chloe, you can also leave entertainment weekly and Italian Vogue off your list. Not her words.

  39. Nikkers says:

    I dunno. Maybe I’m one of those loonies, but I can understand how 2 people could meet and fall in love. I can believe that they fell for each other, so broke up with their significant others to be together. How is that wrong? It’s not cheating if you dump your partner to be with someone else. That’s just life. And I’d much rather be dumped than be cheated on for years, a la Sandra Bullock.

  40. fan says:

    I felt sorry for Satsuki until I read “She has since said, more than once, that the break-up was the best thing for her. She knew he was not the man she wanted him to be and there was something wrong in the relationship.”
    Why didn’t she leave then? Golddigger, too much enjoying to spend his money.
    Why didn’t she talk when they broke up? Why now, after the wedding? Jealousy and envy or what? And her father is not telling the truth. The flat in NY was bought in her name they never loked for a house in NY together. There are women left behind without this kind of security.

  41. Mia says:

    Eh, it’s sketchy as hell, but what can you do? They haven’t milked their relationship or used it to promote their movies. They’ve tried to keep it on the down low & for the most part they’ve been successful. I do feel bad for Satsuki, though.

    As far as Jen Aniston, she is a homewrecking hypocrite. Her PR strategy portrayed her as America’s sweetheart, whose husband was stolen by that hussy, Angelina. She milked that cow for years longer than she was actually married. Now, she’s the woman who poached, but it’s not the same. Uh…okay. Not.

  42. N.D. says:

    I don’t get what’s wrong about falling in love and getting out of relationship to jump into another because of that. It’s life! What’s a point in repressing your feelings, what good it would do your partner if you stay with them out of pity or duty? 9 chances out of 10 it’ll only make both of you miserable.

    And actually their thoughtfullness about their exes feelings is a nice touch. That’s the least they could do after supposedly hurting them with sudden breakup news (at least in Satsuki case it seems to be the case). Certain JA could have taken a lesson from them.

    Finally them being hot isn’t linked to them being forgiven as a cheaters or something along those lines. It’s a totally unrelated commentary. Their passion for each other is hot, they looks good together, that’s all that’s implied there. It’s not an argument pro or against adultery.

  43. Bailey says:

    these 2 broke up with their previous partners and fell head over the heels for each and got married. this happens every day, how is this news? no one cheated.
    if a relationship isn’t working, you should end end. I think people have a problem with them moving quicker, who is to judge how quickly people move on in their lives?

  44. kibbles says:

    I find all of this so shady. People – especially men – in mid-life crises do these sorts of things all the time. They dump their families or long term partners out of the blue. You can call it passion, love, or whatever you want but that doesn’t mean Rachel and Daniel will last or that they are even compatible as husband and wife. I honestly think this looks worse than when Brad and Angie got together. At least Brangelina gave the appearance of being fairly level headed about their decision to become a couple and start a family together. I just have a bad feeling about this particular whirlwind romance. I don’t think it will last so Satsuki should get on with her life and she can laugh when these two end up divorced in a few years.

  45. Len says:

    O, then tell me how she should have gone about it? How should JA have handled it where it didn’t appear like she was milking it? Because stating that you’re happy and not talking about it apparantly equals milking it. I’m curious to hear how she should have handled this.

    • Truth says:

      Wow, this is an old article…and I shouldn’t even bother commenting but I have to say I am shocked that somebody developed the tunnel vision to wrongly deny the mountains of evidence of Aniston playing the victim card when she had the largest, most underhanded, and extensive smear campaign her ex that I have ever seen when the “scandal” was fabricated by tabloids.

      Her Vanity Fair interview had far more offensive implications than that as well as using her friends to badmouth Pitt as diabolical & shady, lie by saying that having kids was not a priority for him..and she mentioned Angelina in a negative light.

      Read between the lines. The public ate up what she said and implied about the situation and she spouted a bunch of bs that contradicted what she initially said after their separation. It would take a hundred pages to analyze that interview by itself and its impact on an angry public fueled by accusations the media was hell-bent on selling.

      Not to mention, her GQ, Vogue, Newsweek, Tonight Show Interview where she took a snipe against Brad, David Arquette trashing them openly on Howard Stern, and Chelsea Handler attacking them with her becoming an associate.

      Most of it was indirect via using her PR team to trash-talk Brad & Angelina while spreading puff pieces that played along with the tabloid-mongering with dozens of false stories and misconceptions that led to false images. I could go on and on. Dig up the proof yourself. One has to be utterly deluded to pretend Aniston did not play the victim card and add power to this garbage when it is based on a lie.

      Aniston fueled this thousands of comments but most of was indirect via her sources planting info as well as trash-talking around town…some of this was documented. She has taken plenty of aim against Brad & Angelina plenty of times. It is utterly nuts to act like she didn’t and only mentioned two sentences. That is mind-boggling to me. The evidence is overwhelming but I am not going to dig up 7 years worth of it.

      Anybody who understands how a celebrity can work the media underhandedly to destroy others so they can enhance their image & popularity, are aware of what tactics she used.

      Brad Pitt did NOT cheat on her. He did not dump her or walk out on her. Their breakup was a peaceful but she fueled the spite and attacks against him when she is NO victim.

      People in LA knew she was having an affair with Theroux when he was with Heidi but that gets tossed aside because people are so brainwashed.

  46. grazi says:

    @Lenn
    ITA with you! All those covers only show me that the media never let it go. I haven’t seen her saying much more than the uncool thing – which was not that bad of a thing to say considering the circumstances. So everybody painted her as the ex-wife whi never let it go, just to criticize her for the image they created. This is ridiculous.
    Just to mention, I am not a JA fan. I just think she is beautiful and thats it. But seeing how people here love to throw stones at her made me have a little sympathy.

  47. Kelly says:

    Ummm… I’m not sure why this thread is mostly about Jennifer Aniston??? I thought it was about Daniel Craig and Rachel Weisz. I understand the lunacy of the “hotter than Brangelina?” thread the other day, but this story doesn’t have much to do with that other tired old chestnut.

    I agree w Nikkers – sometimes these things just happen, doesn’t make it right or less hurtful. But ALMOST EVERY SINGLE PERSON HERE has experienced a breakup! That’s just the nature of relationships! Much better to get out of something that’s just not working – it hurts, but that’s the nature of the beast. Why hold famous people to a different standard than everyone else? They’re allowed to break up and move on to someone else too.

  48. Chloe says:

    @ Len, grazi

    Okay guys, now you’re doing it again, you’re making Jennifer Aniston a victim – this time of the media. As if she was the daughter of Caveman McUnderock, had no publicist, no experience in show business and absolutely no awareness of how these things work.

    I’ll repeat again what I think – I believe JA was very conscious of what was going on, and when things got out of control she switched to the victim role again, this time blaming the tabloids. There are *many* actors who somehow manage to avoid the tabloid craze.

    Anyway. Let’s agree to politely disagree, since as Kelly pointed out, this is getting slightly off topic.

  49. guesty says:

    It is hot…which makes it 10x worse for Satsuki.

  50. Eve says:

    @ Kelly:

    Ummm… I’m not sure why this thread is mostly about Jennifer Aniston?

    Didn’t you know? The world revolves around her for some people.

  51. Kelly says:

    @Eve – aha! Thank you for clearing it up; I understand now. From now on I’m going to post to every single thread on cb, drawing a parallel to JA’s life. And I’m going to draw parallels in my own life as well! Let’s see… I’m wearing a black dress and a gold chain today! Jennifer always wears black dresses and gold chains. We must be cosmically linked. Wait – Rachel also frequently wears black dresses! She’s wearing one in the picture above! But she’s wearing a silver necklace, so she must be evil.

    It must be that hour of the morning when I get a little light-headed because I need another cup of coffee, LOL…

  52. orion70 says:

    @fan, I think there’s a bit of a difference between sensing something wrong in a relationship and accepting that your partner is carrying on with someone else.

  53. N.D. says:

    @Len My advice to JA? How about not going out with your new bf till his ex has moved out of their shared appartment? How about not releasing PDA photos by professional photographer mere days after ex did move out? How about refraining from declaring your absolute happiness on national TV for a few weeks?

    Rachel and Daniel managed just that and more. Heck, even Brangelina did. Not Aniston and Theroux though.

  54. Nah, nah & nah... says:

    They’re hot, I’m happy for them and am looking forward to following a hot, mature couple in the tabs for a change.

    Without an extenuating circumstance like a service deployment of something, being engaged for more than 2 years is a sure sign a marriage, if it happens at all, will not be successful. I have no sympathy for the mates that were left behind. When you are too lazy or comfy or unsure in your engagement to jump the broom, they’re’s nothing there to feel sorry for when it’s over.

    Honestly, I hope they’re’s no pregnancy as I hope they did it for love and love only. That would make it the hottest of all and the funnest to watch unfold.

  55. N.D. says:

    @Angela: It seems that on this site actors who cheat or leave their wives/long-time girlfriends are not criticized as much or at all when their new wife/girlfriend is perceived as hotter than the previous one.

    It’s absolutely not true. Who is praised and who is trashed depends entirely on how they fare with blogger of the day (which is Kaiser in 95% of posts). If she likes them she finds something nice to say, if not she always finds something to critisize and you can see people in comments pointing this bias out. But that’s the nature of personal blog for you.

    In comments you can see just as many people mindlessly trashing Brangelina as those who mindlessly praise them. Same goes to Aniston.

  56. N.D. says:

    @Nah, nah & nah…
    I think they may start trying for a baby of their own soon even if they ain’t pregnant now.

  57. Turtle Dove says:

    Neither was married. Relationships come. Relationships go. None of the parties involved were obligated to be with one another forever and ever. They fell in love, so why shouldn’t they be together?

  58. spinner says:

    Hottest couple around. I always give long engagements the side-eye. Something is up if your relationship gets stuck in the “engagement stage.”

  59. Pyewacket says:

    To be honest, I could give a fig less who cheats in Hollywood and who doesn’t, because when it boils down to it, they are all liars, as that is their job, as an actor. I believe nothing that any celeb says about their pristine personal life. They say what they say in order to maintain a reputation, all done by skilled PR firms who conveniently subtract, add, smudge on dates of make-ups, break-ups, pregnancies, divorces, etc.

    I get it, people hate Aniston, hate Brangelina, hate this couple, or anyone that doesn’t fit into their morally perfect world. The thing that bothers me is how many of us posting here are without sin in our distant or not so distant past? How many of us are willing to put ourselves and our private lives out there for public scrutiny? I am far from perfect, and I suspect those screaming at all these infidelities are not that lily white either, and you know what? THAT’S OKAY! People fall in and out of love all the time. Sometimes people get hurt, sometimes things are done in a shitty way, but it happens, end of story.

    Sorry for the rant, but I get tired of these threads escalating into a war of who was wronged more or who is hotter or whatever. It is all OPINION. We all have one. Not everyone likes the same people.

  60. Missy says:

    The Daniel-Rachel affair is so not hot! At least Jennifer Aniston didn’t have a kid when Brad took off with Angelina! I never thought Daniel Craig was hot (even when he was Bond). He looks like he works all day in the coal mines. Living hard, drinking hard, you get my drift. He’s gonna be a mess when he’s 60.

  61. Jana says:

    Whatever. I didn’t judge Angie and Brad. I don’t judge these two. But I feel tremendous empathy for the ones left behind at the time it happened. That same with Jen’s new beau’s life-in longtime girlfriend. It’s heartbreaking. You feel someone pulling away and you can’t get answers (well, truthfull answers.) And then eventually you’re hit with them moving out and immediately in love with someone else. Then you see it all so clearly, but the pain is horrible. It happened to me. And for these women to have seen their exes all over the place in the mags and tv shows would be heartbreaking. But everyone moves on and finds happiness. I did eventually and couldn’t be happier.

  62. Eve says:

    @ Kelly:

    From now on I’m going to post to every single thread on cb, drawing a parallel to JA’s life. And I’m going to draw parallels in my own life as well!

    Make sure to make it look like she’s winning. Always. If you’re wearing a black dress and a gold chain — both simply don’t look as good as hers. So you must type something like this: “I’m wearing a similar black dress and a gold chain, but Jen (make sure to always call her as if you guys were BFF) looks sooooooo much better than I ever could”.

  63. Isa says:

    I would be hurt too, if I spent so long with someone without getting married. Only to have him break up with me and get married 6 months later. I mean, I would know something wasn’t obviously right (like supposedly Satsuki admitted) but it would still hurt.

  64. bluhare says:

    My husband was married before to a woman whom he met while she was married to someone else. He says they did not have a physical affair while she was married, but they got involved and she left her husband and then they got married.

    We were talking about it once, and he said that he should have known it wouldn’t work out because it was based on a lie — the lie they were telling her husband. I thought that was pretty astute.

  65. Iggles says:

    I’m meh about this couple. I love Rachel Weisz but Craig reminds me of a monkey. I know that sounds messed up, but it’s true! He and George Bush have that in common..

    Don’t like the sketchiness of how they hooked up and being “hot” doesn’t excuse it. Though, I understand how Rachel may have wanted to get far away from the sketchiness of her Ex. I still think there’s a possibility Darren is the real father of Natalie Portman’s baby..

  66. TXCinderella says:

    I just don’t get the appeal of this guy. His big flapping ears and lack of upper lip are just…ugh.

  67. Very Telling says:

    @Hmmm Cheaters never prosper Really?tell that Paul Newman and Joanne Woodard, Tom Hanks and Rita Wilson , etc

  68. Carrie B. says:

    I do love the way Craig holds a woman when in public. Go and check every pic of him with past and present women. He always holds them in such an intimate and tender manner.

  69. gabs says:

    Im not judging them for their sketchy romance BUT I dont think its fair to say Satsuki shouldnt complain because at least she got to nail him for 6 years. Come on kaiser! She has a right to be hurt. Anyone would be in that situation. She needs to tell her dad to shut it though because hes making her look pathetic. No one (with self-respect) wants their cheating ex to know how devastated they are.

  70. ElleGin says:

    Sometimes people fall in love with other people, and it definitely sucks for the other partner, but at least they have the decency to stay low-key. They didn’t brag about it or post happily-ever-after pictures every where. This is what makes me feeling, “Alright, too bad that they had to hurt others in the process, but I guess things like this happen.”

  71. Minx2 says:

    I never liked him with Satsuki, she has this weird expression all the time. I think it’s very telling that they were engaged for a long time and nothing came of it.. I think it shows that a relationship is not ready to move up a notch. Same goes for Rachel’s relationshp with Darren. And Daniel leaving for another person is not cheating! Cheating means being with someone, telling them lies, sleeping with them while you’re also sleeping on the side with someone else but with no intention of leaving the primary relationship. Leaving the relationship soon after you fall for another person is not cheating.. it’s just falling in love with another person. I don’t blame either one of them that they fell out of love with their previous partners. It’s sad for those partners (if they still care) but it’s just life. What are you supposed to do? Live miserable life forever?

  72. Heatheradair says:

    (wow. how did this entire thread end up being about the Aniston? ugh).

    I sort of love that both of these guys spent YEARS not marrying their respective others, then hook up and IMMEDIATELY race to make it legal. Fascinating. Guess when you meet the right person…….

  73. littlemissnaughty says:

    I have no idea why we’re qualifying homewrecking here. You either are a homewrecker or you’re not and if these two are (it seems like that’s the case) then that alone makes them not hot. At all. There’s nothing more unattractive than cheating, whether you fall in love or not.
    And Jennifer Aniston really tried not to talk about it for a long time, it was the media who wouldn’t let this go. But that’s not even the point. She’s not better or worse than anyone else who cheats.

    And Kaiser, holding people to their own standards? Well, does that mean if these two find nothing wrong with cheating or simply never had the chance to publicly complain about it then that’s okay? That’s an interesting view. I don’t share it but okay.

  74. marge says:

    “The more I read about Rachel and Daniel, the more I feel like they were just two forces of nature coming together, exploding with each other. HOT.”

    i totally agree

  75. machiavelli says:

    I never liked Craig. I just don’t get his appeal.

    Whats with parents giving information to the press? They should just shut up and let people get over their breakupin peace. Maybe Satsuki doesn’t want the whole world to know how she feels.

  76. MLM says:

    Craig reminds me of a buff Vladimir Putin–this is not a good thing.

  77. T.C. says:

    Something happened on that movie set that wasn’t on the up and up. These two CHEATED on their significant others while filming their movie together. Daniel Craig has one of the best P.R. agents in Hollywood that’s selling this story as a “love story”. At the end of the day, these two are nothing but cheaters. What is wrong with breaking up with other people FIRST before starting a new relationship? Just more respectful that way.

  78. mln76 says:

    Didn’t read all the comments but the worst thing to me is that Rachel was Satsuki’s ‘friend’. There is nothing worse than going after a friends’ man.

  79. Lisa Turtle says:

    Satsuki looks like a muppet.

  80. lucy2 says:

    I like them both as actors, and they are a pretty couple, but it’s a real shame others got hurt along the way. I know there are some exceptions, but it rarely seems to work out for relationships that start that way. bluhare, I think you made a good point about things that start out as a lie.
    I can totally understand why they kept it all very quiet though, and agree with #13 about the “friend”. Why would they tell someone who talks to the tabs?

  81. Cheyenne says:

    He should have bad the decency to break off with Satsuki before he started nailing his co-star. But like most guys, he wanted to have it all ways.

  82. Sassy says:

    @TXCinderella – totes agree! Daniel Craig is NOT HOT. Blech.

  83. Kelly says:

    Nobody knows whether they were having sex on the set. Unless you installed hidden cameras, or were invited into their room to watch, you just don’t know. I mean, c’mon.

    Also, I always thought Satsuki looked ilke the Runaway Bride.

  84. N.D. says:

    @mln76: They weren’t really friends though. Basicaly they’ve meet a few times socially during the filming. It’s not like they were each other confidants.

  85. UKHels says:

    daniel craig and his hideous filtrum – ewwwww

  86. Aurelia says:

    Satsuki looks just like Pippa Middleton. Spec the tanned pic of her.

  87. solamia says:

    Team Satsuki.

    He’s super hot to be sure, but this rendition of what went down makes the most sense. And that’s effed up how it went down, socializing with the girl in some capacity while they both diddled behind the scenes at some point. To stay with a man for six years, get dumped for a coworker and acquaintance, and have them get married within a year? Yeah, I’d go boiled bunny glen close all over their asses, they’re lucky she has more class.

  88. Jen34 says:

    Neither Daniel Craig nor Rachel Weisz were married. No vows were broken since no vows were made. End of story.

    It happens all the time. I don’t understand why the names of Jen/Brad/Angie keep appearing in these DC/RW threads. Apples and oranges.

  89. malia says:

    Forces of nature bound together? Naw. It’s called a mid-life crisis, just presented in more attractive packages, folks.

    And the only reason I bet Satsuki is speaking indirectly through friends and family is because of the lame attempt to overromanticize what went down with Daniel and rachel. They are trying to make it look like they made clean breaks and what not. And I don’t blame the girl for saying, excuse, that’s bullshit.

  90. mln76 says:

    @ND obviously I have no clue what Rachel & Satsuki’s relationship was. Whether it was merely cordial or whether she considered her a friend. But I have heard that they were friends repeated several times in the press. If they were close that reflects really poorly on Rachel. I think what happened sounds hurtful towards her. I feel sympathy for her (not Aronofsky because he’s rumored to have more than one skeleton in his closet) at the same time that I think that Rachel and Daniel make a good match and I hope everybody moves on.

    @Jen34 that’s your opinion not the ‘end of the story’ many commentors don’t agree with your take on the committed relationships vs marriage.

  91. Swanning says:

    Craig and Weisz both lied, they both cheated, they were both duplicitous to partners who trusted them. They deserve each other. I wish all the best to Satsuki, she deserves better than a man who would do something like this to her. Where I come from, we call men like Craig “slime-bags”.

  92. gg says:

    They’re not hot. Daniel is a goofbag with a funny upper lip thingy.

    Satsuki looks whiney and bored in all of the photos when she was supposedly happy.

    Rachel is meh.

  93. khaveman says:

    They were probably not totally truthful with their partners, but they were not formally committed and at the end of the day, Daniel and Rachel tied the knot. They did it formally. That says real commitment. People get hurt in relationships. That may sound cold, but six years and an engagement ring does not Daniel Craig your husband make. Sounds like they were having problems. Gorgeous woman and I’m sure she has plenty of men in line!

  94. michelle says:

    Interesting coupling. Sidenote: some people commenting here need to find more productive things to do with their time. God DAMN.

  95. kira says:

    This really sucks for Satsuki. I feel really bad for her :-(

    If it’s any consolation to her==this relationship probably won’t last. People who make major life decisions in the heat of passion…well, that doesn’t usually end well. These two haven’t seen each other’s dark sides yet. And when that happens, well, you know the rest… it happens time and time again.

  96. sil says:

    not all the relationships that starts with cheating end up badly… I think maybe if the people involved do not know each other, or if one of them is a serial cheater,then you are correct.
    some romances did not work, like ingrid bergman and rosellini, or the huge passion of Taylor and richard burton, but as someone said above: same E. Taylor and the man that left her as a widow, Michael todd, Paul newman and joanne woodward, spielberg, hanks, j. roberts, hey even katherine hepburn and spencer tracy, bacall and ogart, loren and carlo ponti, Prince charles and camilla, Woody allen and Soon-yi, (like it or not, still together!), Jlo and Marc Anthony to date, and James Cameron and current wife, suzy amis, still together.

  97. N.D. says:

    @mln76: Well, they say “she considered her a friend since they hanged out on th set”. You don’t become best friends with someone over a few workplace visits.

    If Rachel and Daniel had and affair (and it seems highly probable) or at least were seriously attracted to each other I can’t disapprove of them taking some time (a few months) to deal with it and not breaking up their long term relationships right away. These affairs are occupational hazard for actors. Probably the delay in coming clean to their SO was due to Racher thinking of her son, she had a lot to consider before dumping DA for DC.

  98. mln76 says:

    @ ND uhm again neither you or I know what the nature of their friendship was. If they were friends or friendly it’s much worse. A woman who smiles in your face whilst she’s screwing your man (or a man who will do the same) is a creep.

    Aside from that I as for whether or not they struggled ‘deciding what to do’ I am sure they did. BUT they lied specifically to Satsuki and she didn’t deserve that. I think lying and sneaking around is more hurtful than the actual cheating in certain ways.

  99. sapphire says:

    I simply don’t think “relationships” are the same thing a marriage. Cheating? Mayhbe stretch that to engaged, but there[‘s no “until death do you part” going on.

  100. REALIST says:

    This whole Daniel-Rachel thing is starting to feel very Liz and Dick to me. I wonder if they will have an equally passionate/destructive relationship.
    Only time will tell.
    Satsuki IS very lovely. She deserves better..good luck to her in the future.

  101. Shy says:

    Yeah I really don’t understand when some people or media can be angry in those kind of situation. It’s one thing if you are married or dating and then suddenly fall in love with someone else and cheat and lie for months. That’s bad.

    But it’s completely honest when you tell your partner that you don’t love them anymore and divorce or split. That’s what normal people should do. Not lie and cheat but split when love is gone. Same was with Brange and same was with Daniel and Rachel. They didn’t cheat and promise each other to leave their partners. Like many married man do. They can promise that for their mistresses for years and never actually do it. Normal people leave their partners and then get together.

  102. Camille says:

    @Iggles: I agree with your comment.

    DC also looks like a Troll to me. I think he is so fugly!
    I don’t find this couple hot at all :( .
    As for how they hooked up- well it all seems dodgy, but its none of my business.

  103. Lauren says:

    S. looks awkward in those above pics. Rachel & Daniel are both British, so therein is their bond. Rachel probably yearned to return to her homeland, and will settle down with Daniel. I think it is romantic-R&D look so lovely together..a good fit. Their Love Story is private & passionate. We don’t have to understand.

  104. lachica says:

    they both spent YEARS eith partners they did not marry. good call. wait for the right one to come along. when they do, you know.

  105. Tuatara says:

    @Aurelia — cosign!! She really does look like Pippa Middleton.

  106. June says:

    solamia/#90: “Yeah, I’d go boiled bunny glen close all over their asses, they’re lucky she has more class.”

    They dont make movies like they use to!

  107. You don't say says:

    So I guess all of those celebrities and everyday folk too, found “the one” multiple times since many people are married more than once. Marriage is no gurantee of permanence, though if married, I am sure that is what you want and since divorce is legal, ending a marriage is also possible, and “till death us do part” are just words. However, to constantly say that if you are not married, though together 5, 10 or more years, your relationship is just a couple of people waiting until the “one” comes along is sad and a very poor way to justify this situation. And the “force of nature” hotness is just making me laugh.

    However, I do agree that relationships end all the time, even marriages, sometimes people just fall out of love and don’t want that person anymore. I just don’t get why long term relationships are de-valued so much here. This couple and many other celebrities met on sets, some married with children, some not, some in long term relationships. It is no more special than any other and no worse either. Just stop with the double standards.

  108. CHRISTIAN_GIRL says:

    Their People Magazine article clearly states that DC and RW MET on the set set of their movie “Dream House” LAST YEAR. NO 10 year or 20 year passion longing between them JUST NEW PASSION. Does that make a difference to this supposed HOTNESS that I obvisously can’t see?

  109. The real Jenny says:

    I think you all missed the best part of this article- the snippet from satsuki’s dad. Of course satsuki tells off her dad. He says things like “she eats like a horse” to the press. It’s a wonder she talks to him at all!

  110. Luckylilgem says:

    DC and RW think they traded up to be with each other. Time will tell… once the HOT “secret” romance mumbo jumbo fades, they will be left with the reality. Yes, they’re hot….but how secure will they feel when they’re off working in separate locations with the NEW HOT co-stars? Look at Brangelina? They won’t work at the same time because they agreed to never be apart for more than 3 days at a time. How ridiculous is that? No trust.

  111. Luckylilgem says:

    PS. Satsuki it’s better that you didn’t marry DC. The dude has Shrek’s ears. Jonathan Rhys-Myers is hotter and younger albeit that drinking problem and temper.

  112. Gossip Owl says:

    I guess I agree with everyone who says neither of them were married. No messy divorce and no actual home wrecking are involved anywhere in this story. Yes, Rachel has a 5 year old son but she obviously chose not to marry Darren for a reason even with a child. With Daniel, I think he left Satsuki because he felt he was making a mistake – for whatever reason. She’s mad now but I am sure that soon she will find someone else. No one knows what goes on behind closed door (except some of us nosy owls).

    I think they are really good friends who both hit 40 and realized they were unhappy with their current relationships. They lament about their problems to one another and BOOM sexy stuff started happening. I can’t say anything bad or good about Satsuki Mitchell but I always thought that Darren Aronofsky was too dweeby for Rachel. I think Rachel realized that she wanted a MAN and Daniel’s relationship with Satsuki wasn’t going well. I am betting these two have had chemistry since way back when and they decided that it was better late than never. At the same time I think this all began to happen due to both of them suffering from a mid-life crisis and questioning the position of their love life. But a mid-life crisis can have benefits. I hope it works out for them, I like them as a couple.
    By the way has anyone else noticed that the British media is quick to “knock up” any girl that dates someone or has a relationship that isn’t “proper” in their eyes?

  113. mln76 says:

    @GossipOwl totally agree with your take on them. I don’t hate them at all because number one they are so low key that there is so much that the public doesn’t know about anyone involved. I just still think it’s painful to have a relationship that longterm end because of infidelity. I feel bad for Satsuki but I hope that these two are happy together.
    @Luckylilgem Actually Brangelina don’t spend more than a few days apart or work separately because they are RAISING SIX KIDS together…

  114. Violet says:

    If Daniel’s relationship was already unraveling early last year, then Satsuki should’ve seen the writing on the wall. He still should’ve completely broken things off before hooking up with Rachel but maybe he did but the overlap was minimal because of their shared history.

    As for Rachel, her ex is rumored to be the true father of Natalie Portman’s baby, which would certainly explain why she moved on.

    @Chloe, I totally agree with you. On all points.

  115. MoMo says:

    Satsuki and Darren could do a Mutt-Marie Anne/Shania-Fred trade in. They could be good for each other as a producer/director couple.

  116. the original bellaluna says:

    I tend to agree with the “force of nature” statement, though I may not agree with the process. (I don’t know the full story; none of us do, hence the word “may”.)

    Hubs and I were a “force of nature” thing, though we were both already free at the time.

    That being said, lies do not create a firm foundation for a relationship base.

  117. hunny says:

    Mmm. All I can say is that you meet that “force-of-nature” someone ALL THE TIME. If you’re really supposed to leave your wife or significant other every time you met someone who fits that bill, well. We’d all end up divorced a million times, single at 75, paying child support…and possibly battling some STD’s. Thank you hollywood. I don’t care if you give me a list of 50 celebrities who got divorced and then died next to their mistress. Sooner or later a person has to grow up and ask themselves if they want to continue that shit into their 50′s and 60′s. And I’m sorry, but you CAN help it when you fall in love. Falling in love is the easiest thing in the world to do…when you set yourself up for it. If you’re keeping your eyes where they need to be, and you’re keeping your thoughts where they need to be, and you’re keeping your hands where they need to be, and you’re keeping your ass where it needs to be, it’s actually quite easy to keep from falling for every piece you come across at work. Cheating never starts with bumping uglies. Don’t know about the rest of you, but when I meet a man who’s willing to cheat for me, I only think of one thing: weakness. The same weakness that’ll happen to him again when the going gets tough. That is NO ONE I’d be with, let alone have kids with.

  118. cara says:

    Meh, I think it’s a lot less romantic and more benign than people are making it. I think they had a basic workplace flirtation, maybe more than that, and they acted on it. And it most likely overlapped somewhere with other relationships cause this is all being done very quietly. They are all adults, I’m not going to judge it, but I’m not going to project some fairy tale upon it either just because they are attractive co-workers.

  119. Nikki Girl says:

    This is depressing, I feel bad for Satsuki. But it proves how much of a butthole Daniel Craig is, she can do better. He is butt-ass ugly too, I don’t get why anyone would think he’s sexy. He’s not even sexy in a rough way to me, he’s just plain creepy and ugly.

    And I don’t think there’s any way this marriage will last- they married in the heat of the moment, they’re caught up in the passion, spontaneity, and romance. All new relationships are passionate and romantic in the beginning. But reality will set in eventually, and hot sex fades a bit too. Sorry, but I’ll be laughing when they break up.

    P.S. That rumor about Darren Aronofsky being the father of Natalie Portman’s baby is absolutely absurd, what a crock of sh*t! Where did that rumor start, the National Enquirer? I don’t like Natalie or her fiance, but there’s no reason to think he’s not the father of her kid, and she seems legitimately in love with him.

  120. Ruby says:

    Not all relationships that begin in infidelity end with infidelity. My husbands father ran off with another woman when he was 3 years old. Leaving his mother to raise him as a single parent- he is still married to this lady. But she is a miserable bitch and their marriage isn’t a happy one. I distinctly remember my mother in law telling me that she (the other woman) was beautiful and when I saw her I nearly peed ny pants she was uggggly. Nobody wanted to blame him- the instigator! This guy my childrens grandfather is a pathetic man who has been pussy whipped for 30 years and still hasnt gotten his balls back from his now wife.

  121. Micki says:

    EPIC!
    So, hm, ARE they hotter than Brangelina or ARE they ordinary homewreckers?
    Shall we settle for hot homewhreckers?LOL

  122. Kiki says:

    who knows what happened. probably a little honesty up front would have been nice for daniel’s ex. everyone will move on, live on and pair up.

  123. Ally says:

    Ew, it’s gross that Rachel was friendly with Satsuki and then left with her man. Not good behavior.

    Otherwise it sounds like they broke off their previous relationships as soon as the affair started, which is about the only good way to handle a bad situation.

  124. sapphire says:

    Infidelity? Homewrecking? Did anyone forget that neither were married? And we sure don’t know the staus six months ago.

  125. ZenB!tch says:

    @Len, Aniston should know better having been on the receiving end before.

    I feel bad for Satsuki and Aronofsky. I liked Rachel and him together. I never really thought Daniel and Satsuki seemed well matched but they seemed happy.

    What fasinates me and if this happens with Aniston I will really be fascinated, is that both Rachel and Daniel had been with their SOs for *years* Rachel even has a son with Aronofsky, yet they get married after 6 months. PREGNANCY doesn’t explain this – she has a child.

    Can someone please explain this? It happens a lot and I have never understood. If you want marriage and this person you are with for years is not “the one” or is not into marriage, why not move on? Why wait until homes are wrecked.

    I still think the only home wrecker here is Angelina as the only married people were Brad and Aniston (ick, why Brad?) but this together for ever, dumped for someone else and then hitched to the new person in a short time phenomenon fascinates me.

    • Truth says:

      Angelina was never actually a homewrecker.

      Plenty of co-stars deal with gossip during a shoot and plenty have quickly rebounded with a co-star after a breakup. The public would give them the benefit of the doubt. Brad, a good guy, who had a strong reputation for ethics might have received it and the backlash would have calmed down if not for Aniston’s tactics and campaigning against him where she very much fed into the idea she was a victim.

      There is zero evidence that they cheated. Angelina became romantically involved with Brad 3 freaking months after he split up with Jen. That marriage and breakup became completely misunderstood since Aniston chose to milk up the tabloid garbage and influence it through her PR team with so much deceit and conniving cover-ups.

      What is astonishing is that her fans are wiping out any evidence of Aniston’s smear campaigns over her dozens of references and the non-stop mentions of Pitt-Jolie as well as her camp painting them as the nasty vindictive ones when she was the one being vindictive and opportunistic.

      Then people blow off or downplay Rachel and Daniel…then continued their brainwashed bashing against two misportrayed targets like Pitt-Jolie.

      This is more about tabloid obsession and being influenced by the media than true morals.

  126. ZenB!tch says:

    @Eve anytime I get to hate on Aniston, I will and I think Angelina is the wrecker but I have never, ever liked Aniston. Not even pre-Brad.

  127. Jeannie says:

    @ Ally
    Do you know how you can discredit the new wife of your ex the best? – When you say she was your friend. Kill two birds with one stone.

    I don’t think Rachel was her friend. I bet they knew each other casually not more. We talk about Hollywood everything is superficial there.

    I also think Satsuki learned a lot during her time with Daniel. She knows she can say through her father a lot because Rachel or Daniel will never disagree by reason of private matters.

  128. V says:

    Rachel Weisz=upgraaaaaaaaade!

  129. Sheigh says:

    Douchebag harmony, wish they stay forever and ever, and I bet Rachel will cheat first on the next three months!

  130. eternalcanadian says:

    Daniel is so fugly. I can’t figure out the sex appeal in him? Bleh! :|

  131. Eve says:

    @ ZenB!tch:

    @Eve anytime I get to hate on Aniston, I will and I think Angelina is the wrecker but I have never, ever liked Aniston. Not even pre-Brad.

    I never said you couldn’t (hate on anyone you wanted). My comment was sarcastic towards those who think Aniston can do no wrong or that everything must be related to her.

  132. Bette says:

    come on people…….this happens all over the world, every day, to many people. you cannot control who you fall in love with and they were not married to others. any woman that waits 6 years in an engagement………….might want to think about why its taking so long to walk the isle. i don’t think there were any laws broken here and i hope they make it together. move on ex’s….

  133. Jane C says:

    Both Daniel and Rachel are immature and selfish for cheating on their relationships. Frankly, I feel sorry for Satsuki, she couldn’t get Daniel to the altar in 6 years and Rachel does it in 6 months? With a kid in tow too? Daniel and Rachel should be careful — if they are quick to cheat in the first place, who’s to say they won’t cheat again? HOT? Oh come on … She’s not that good looking! They deserve each other. I feel sorry for their ex’s.

  134. John D says:

    Apparently, Daniel has a habit of nailing his co-stars. Anyone remember the Sienna MIller affair rumors during LayerCake? If I were Rachel, I’d be plenty worried to see who he hooks up with next while filming a movie.

  135. Sapphyre says:

    This union is not going to last.
    Even though I love him as James Bond, I get the impression that Daniel Craig is a hard drinking son-of-a-B in real life.
    I hope they can get 2 more Bond movies out of him after Skyfall.

  136. Tdotgurl says:

    I man that does not honor his relationships should never be honored. I’ve lost respect for him already. I hope this Satzuki girl finds a better man.