Did Jennifer Aniston & John Mayer get back together because she’s pregnant?

Jennifer Aniston’s dreams may have just come true. Or maybe some less-than-ideal-but-she’ll-make-the-best-of-it dreams. According to Just Jared, the real reason Aniston and John Mayer have reconciled isn’t because he promised to be a good/non-douche bagging boyfriend – it’s because she’s pregnant with a little mini-player Mayer.

Jennifer Aniston has reunited with musician John Mayer because she’s pregnant with his child, according to Australia’s New Weekly.

That’s the reason behind their surprise reunion???

It was reported just last week that Aniston took Mayer back! But after a string of secret dates, could this reunited couple be expecting a child together???

Aniston visited Mayer’s home late Friday night. And you can also check out these pictures of Aniston taken just last night.

Does she look pregnant to you???

[From Just Jared]

Jennifer doesn’t really look pregnant to me but that doesn’t mean anything. There’s a long period of time where you really can’t tell on most women. And considering all the years of “poor sad Jennifer” gossip, I’m guessing she’d be baring her belly for anyone and everyone if she had even the slightest reason to.

I could go either way on John and Jen as a couple, but I think it’s pretty obvious John’s nowhere near ready to be a dad. He strikes me as one of those guys that might be mature enough for it in his mid-fifties or sixties. He’s still at that clichéd “let’s bang every waitress in the room because we can” stage that men go through in their twenties… and thirties… and maybe a little longer.

If they did just get back together for the publicity, I have to give John and Jen kudos for working it.

Here’s Jennifer at Sacha Baron Cohen and Isla Fisher’s daughter Olive’s first birthday party this weekend. She is also shown yesterday outside the Sunset Tower Hotel. Her stomach looks pretty flat to me, but who knows. Images thanks to Fame.

 

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

52 Responses to “Did Jennifer Aniston & John Mayer get back together because she’s pregnant?”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Mairead says:

    I’ve heard that with a lot of women, on their first pregnancy they show very little in the first 5 months.

    That would certainly trump any celebrity adoptions in say, 6 months time, wouldn’t it? :wink:

    Odder things have happened, my dears.

  2. CiCi says:

    ooooh, i hope so! as much as everyone claims to hate jen, i bet they’d be obsessed with her as a pregnant woman.

  3. TC says:

    I doubt that she will end up being one with kids of her own making. Just doesn’t seem to suit her, but time will tell. I don’t know about everyone else, but when I was pregnant, even early on, a belt would have been uncomfortable, so I am going to cast my vote as a negative on the Mayerspawn.

  4. Leandra says:

    If she didn’t have children with Brad Pitt who wanted them and probably begged her to have them, why would she have them with the less than appealing John Mayer who is 10 years younger than her and isn’t known to stay with anyone for very long.

  5. CiCi says:

    because she didn’t want children at the time brad did, and now she does? people’s priorities change as they get older. as far as john mayer, maybe she wants a child, regardless of the father being around full time or not.

  6. goons says:

    personally i do not see jennifer in the motherhood light..she strikes me more as the oprah type..these are woman who just dont want children..Besides, this is breaking news comming from australia and i just feel they are trying to sell mags that’s all…

  7. Kaiser says:

    Yeah, doubt she’s pregnant. I don’t think motherhood is her priority.

    Sidenote: I hadn’t watched anything with her for several years (no, not even Friends re-runs) but last night some girlie channel was showing Rumor Has It, and I watched the last twenty minutes. Let me just say… she’s a worse actress than I remember, and she’s had major facial plastic surgery in the past few years, since filming that movie. It’s kind of scary that few people call her on it. 8O

  8. Roni says:

    Yeah Kaiser,

    It was on the Oxygen channel…I saw that it was coming on and I turned it right off…that was a stupid movie!

  9. Kaiser says:

    @Roni – Oh, yeah. Just judging from the last 20 minutes, it was a trainwreck movie. Poorly acted too.

  10. Roni says:

    Kaiser,

    Since I consider myself a “movie buff,” I will watch a movie all the way through at least once…and I watched that movie (all the way through) and I have NO desire to EVER see that movie again! Not only was the movie a complete BORE…there was NO CHEMISTRY between Kevin Costner (I hope I spelled his name right) and Jennifer Aniston! It was hard to believe that they could even be a couple and they were acting! A really good movie I saw over this past weekend was “The Secret Lives of Bees!” That movie was really good, some movies I will go back and see more than once…this movie wasn’t like that for me; it was a good movie, a little sad at times…but I will buy it when it hits the stores for my movie collection. I thought all the women in the movie (including Dakota) were excellent and BELIEVEABLE!

  11. xiaoecho says:

    Congrats Jen on your twins……er, pregnancy……that’s if you’re pregnant

    might as well work backwards

  12. devilgirl says:

    What is so great about celebrities having babies? It isn’t a as though common folk don’t have them as well.

  13. Linda says:

    OMG…out come the Aniston haters!!!

    Jen is pathetic, Jen is a bad actress, Jen deserved Brad leaving her because she didn’t want to have kids….blah, blah, blah….

    And these are the same people who wonder why people pile on Saint Angelina. Kaiser – one word when it comes to bad acting – Alexander.

  14. Kaiser says:

    Linda, I agree that there was a lot of bad acting in Alexander. Between the miscasting of Colin Farrell, Rosario Dawson’s “WTF?” performance and Jared “maybe if I just stare vacantly, people will think I’m acting” Leto, the only things making that film watchable were Val Kilmer and Jolie.

    Roni – thanks for the tip. I’m not a big Jennifer Hudson fan, but maybe I’ll rent it.

  15. Cinderella says:

    I think this is just another example of Jen’s publicist stirring the pot.

    I’ll have to agree with Linda on the acting in Alexander. AJ is always captivating to watch, but her accent was rather Transylvanian in that flick.

  16. PJ says:

    Mayer has had steady girlfriends and longtime male friends, which is an indicator that he wants and is capable of forming real attachments. It seems like he’s been focused on his career, but I think he might go for the big relationship if he found it.

    If Jennifer was pregnant from August she would have known it for a while now.

  17. Zoe says:

    Wow, her face looks so different lately. Her nose and lips look different. The tell-tale sign of pregnancy will be if we hear she stops drinking.
    Did anyone see her in “The Good Girl” or “Friends with Money”? I thought she was surprisingly good. Also, “Along Came Polly”?

  18. vdantev says:

    Congrats to JA if it turns out to be true and not tabloid muck-raking. Linda, your desperation is unbecoming. Name every movie Jen has been in that was directed by Clint Eastwood, or someone other than some former MTV video hack.

  19. pamela says:

    I have been wondering myself for the longest while, why the tabs dont call her out on all the obvious plastic surgeries she has done. They continuously make fun of Nicole Kidman, so why not her. Her PR must be really influential.

  20. Kaiser says:

    Good point, V. Clint Eastwood…or Michael Winterbottom, Robert DeNiro, Robert Zemeckis, Doug Liman, Oliver Stone, or the late, great John Frankenheimer.

  21. kate says:

    i doubt she’s preggers. also, i’m not on team aniston or team jolie, but i think i like jen more. she looks like she would be fun to hang out with, while angie looks like she would sleep with your husband behind your back. and also angie seems to have no female friends. i was told once to “never trust a woman with no woman friends”, and that advice has been very accurate.

  22. Anne says:

    I’m sure Jolie has female friends – how would we know? It’s not like we are all neighbours or related to her. Christ.

    Aniston looks really happy in these pictures. Mayer seems like a total douchebag, maybe Jen will get a baby out of the deal and throw him to the curb.

  23. Linda says:

    Hey V…not desperation – I do believe it was Angelina who had received Razzie nominations 4 years in a row – yea, such a great actress she is.

  24. Kaiser says:

    Kate – does Marianne Pearl not count?

  25. Cinderella says:

    I’m on neither team, but didn’t Marianne Pearl sleep with someone’s husband, too?

    I can do without those type of friends.

  26. Bodhi says:

    I’d be more concerned about that type of husband, but that’s just me.

    IF (big if) its true, I doubt it will last. Everyone knows that people shouldn’t get together/ stay together just because there are children involved

  27. Tina says:

    Insecurity becomes some of you. If you have it together in your relationship then you do not need to worry about a third party, after all, it does take two to tango. I would rather my husband slept with Jolie than Anniston, I will be so offended that he slept with someone as unattractive that it would be grounds for divorce.

  28. Jenni says:

    I hope she is – I’m getting excited already!!!

  29. PJ says:

    If it makes you look better, what’s wrong with plastic surgery — especially for actors, whose careers depend on looking good?

    Note I’m saying “IF” you look better. I really love Nicole Kidman, but can understand why the tabs give her a hard time about the Botox and puffy lips. She is such a great beauty, it’s upsetting when she messes with Mother Nature.

  30. Key says:

    It’s highly doubtable.

    I mean, yeah they’ve been hooking up but for exactly How would an Australian paper get the scoop before any of the US tabs? Also I don’t think Jen’s the “accidental” kind of girl or she’d have gone ahead and had a few with one of those ex’s that actually treated her well.

    Nope, I think Jen’s real agenda is a family, not a husband, not a kid, but the whole package. The question is is John going to give it to her?

  31. Skank Basher says:

    Pamela: Regarding Aniston’s plastic surgeries – the media HAS pointed out that she’s had a nose job as well as Juvaderm (or some such filler)injections in her upper lip. :?

  32. someone says:

    Im a Jen fan, and I don’t believe this story, but strange things happen in Hollyweird. Did anyone see “Rock Star” with Mark Walberg and Jen?? I loved that movie.

  33. Zoe says:

    @PJ: “If it makes you look better, what’s wrong with plastic surgery” :lol:

  34. kate says:

    @ anne: obviously i am not related to angelina, but the fact that i have never seen her once photographed with a girlfriend just going to lunch or whatever, or the fact that she never talks about friends, only about men and kids. i just think it is strange, that’s all.

  35. Mairead says:

    Regarding Alexander: I cannot effin’ stand Val Kilmer. As far as I was concerned, anything with Philip II of Macedon (one of my heroes) should have been done 10 years previous, with Anthony Hopkins in the role. SImple as.

    Colin wasn’t miscast – those weird bleached caterpillar eyebrows were. And at least Jared Leto can do a decent Dublin accent.

    Angie was all right in the film. But that accent!!! I swear she was two syllables away from saying “I vaaaant to suck your blaaaaaahd”

    OH PLLLLLLLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEASE let it be triplets!!!! :mrgreen:

  36. pamela says:

    @ Skank Basher: I am sure she has had more work done, especially to her cheeks. They always look puffy now.

  37. pamela says:

    Mairead,“I vaaaant to suck your blaaaaaahd” :lol: . Now you know I am a big Angie fan, but that is funny.

  38. Mae says:

    She definitely has good karma coming her way. If she wants to be pregnant I pray she is. She is such a class act and everyone who knows her says she is so kind and down to earth. She probably didn’t want children with Pitt because she didn’t trust him.. obviously correct assumption.

  39. Cheyenne says:

    The source of this rumor, people, is a notorious Australian tabloid that has a reputation for fabricating bullshit out of thin air to sell magazines. This sounds like the Huvane PR machine going into hyperdrive.

    However, I will be delighted if it’s true, for the sole reason that the Infernal Triangle will be officially dead — unless the tabs start spewing forth items such as “JEN SECRETLY WISHING IT WAS BRAD’S BABY” or something like that. Or more likely, starting a “Who’s baby is cuter” contest. Whatever, as long as it keeps their circulation up and their bottom line in the black.

    Also, if it is true, I would love to see what the Jenhags will call the blessed event, since they had no hesitation whatever about labeling Shiloh Jolie-Pitt and the J-P twins as bastards. Since Aniston, if pregnant, will be expecting a bastard as well, I wonder if the Jenhags will bestow this soubriquet on the Johniston product.

  40. ino says:

    I think Jen just want John back for fun and sex only. Not for baby. She doesn’t want baby at all.

  41. Judy says:

    God I hope not, that kid will have more “uncles” than Joan Crawfords did.

  42. Cheyenne says:

    Okay everybody, relax. Huvane was up to his old tricks. Plant a rumor in one tabloid or website, deny it in another. This time he was test driving it to see how it would play so he planted it in two obscure places, but it didn’t play. Aniston is getting ripped apart on the gossip sites. God, this shit gets older than dirt.

    http://www.wowowow.com/post/jennifer-anistons-pregnant-john-mayer-australia-magazine-nz-not-true-126809?promo=news

  43. Kaiser says:

    Consistent with the good calls, Cheyenne. Another day, another Huvane plant. Oh right, shall we mention again that The Changeling is coming out for wide release?

    Oh, Pity Party! :roll:

  44. czarina says:

    I can’t see how a pregnancy rumour benefits JA. I mean, sure, stirs up gossip for 24 hours, but how does it help her? That she carelessly got pregnant with the baby of a man she dated for a couple of months and had already broken up with?
    No, I’ll hand this rumour right to the tabloids. I never thought it was true for a second. I’m not a huge Aniston fan, but she strikes me as smart and self-aware enough not to ever “accidentally” get pregnant, and way too smart to “accidentally/on purpose” get pregnant with a guy like John Meyer!
    (that could, however, be a projection of my own dislike for Meyer)

  45. Tina says:

    Jennifer: cute girl, can’t act, only good at sitcom-slapstick stuff.

    Angelina: envy her face and body, but she’s such a self-sainted… ughhh.

    Mayer: HATE HIM.

    I hope Jenn gets a baby, either through adoption or by natural means. I think she would make a good mother too.

  46. ff says:

    I hope not. Too much drama. Seriously.

  47. Granger says:

    Well, if she IS pregnant, at least that will be something for interviewers to focus on while she’s plugging her upcoming movies, because god knows they won’t be able to say anything good about her acting.

  48. sauvage says:

    GOOD LORD! Is there any chance that I will live to see people talk about Jennifer Aniston without mentioning Angelina Jolie and vice versa?

  49. Kenny says:

    Pregnancy doesn’t always instigate getting back together, but who knows with celebrities. Maybe it’s just a publicity stunt.