Angelina Jolie: “I’m still a bad girl, it just… belongs to Brad and our adventures”

Angelina Jolie’s promotion for her directorial debut (for full-length feature film), In the Land of Blood and Honey, is starting now. I guess it really started when she got the cover of Vanity Fair a few months ago, but now it’s super-serious. I wonder how much press Angelina is going to do as writer-director, and how much press the actual film actors will be doing? Yes, most of the actors are not well known to American audiences, so Angelina’s name is going to be the biggest selling point. But it will be interesting to see how much press she does in support of the film. For now, though, Angelina is going to be on 60 Minutes on Sunday! Huzzah! CBS has already released a short video clip and some interview excerpts:

She wasn’t always toy shopping with Shiloh and visiting with refugees in the Congo. Prior to her current, globe-trotting wife as an actress, humanitarian, mother of six and longtime partner to Brad Pitt, Angelina Jolie first became a household name as a weird, risk-taking Hollywood hottie.

Now 36, the star (whose directorial and screenwriting debut In the Land of Blood and Honey is out in December) says that the much-parodied darkness of her earlier years was very real — and very scary.

“I went through heavier, darker times and I survived them. I didn’t die young,” Jolie tells 60 Minutes’ Bob Simon in a new interview airing Sunday.

“So I am very lucky. There are other artists and people that didn’t survive certain things,” adds the Oscar winner.

But, she teases to Simon: “People can imagine that I did the most dangerous, and I did the worst. . . for many reasons, I shouldn’t be here…You just. . . too many times where you came close to too many dangerous things, too many chances taken too, too far.”

Not that she’s completely reformed, of course. “I’m still a bad girl,” Jolie insists. “I still have that side of me. . . it’s just in its place now. . . it belongs to Brad–or our adventures,” she gushes of Pitt, 47, her man since 2005.

[Via Us Weekly]

That was kind of hot – “I’m still a bad girl… I still have that side of me. . . it’s just in its place now. . . it belongs to Brad–or our adventures.” Sexy adventures. With whips and lots of leather. No wonder Brad looks so tired.

But with the good comes the bad. A British tabloid – Grazia, excerpted in The Mail – claims that Angelina is subsisting on a mere 600 calories a day and that she’s just wasting away. Which is weird, because in photos recently, Jolie hasn’t been looking so super-skinny. She looks like she’s been eating solids, more so than the Duchess of Cambridge:

Angelina Jolie’s weight is said to hover around the 97lb mark – underweight for her 5ft 8in height. Regardless of her emaciated frame though, sources say Angelina rarely eats a full meal and frequently forgets to eat. According to Grazia magazine, Angelina survives on as little as 600 calories a day, which is the equivalent of two bowls of cereal with milk.

‘Angelina has been known to start her day with little more than a spoonful of coconut oil and a handful of cereal,’ a source told Grazia last week. ‘The worrying thing is that she is so busy, she often forgets to eat. Sometimes she’ll skip lunch altogether or will just grab a few almonds and some gummy bears while she’s on the go, or will have a protein-based shake rather than anything more substantial. Then dinner could be something like a lean steak and a glass of red wine.’

The Grazia source said: ‘What with her career, Brad and their six kids, Angelina has a lot on. Yes, stress plays a part. She is the type of person who drops weight when she’s stressed out. She simply loses her appetite and can survive on almost nothing. But a lot of people are worried that she is taking things too far and that she won’t have the strength to do all the things she wants to do if she doesn’t gain some weight. Everyone has been begging her to eat more and she is trying not to get any skinnier, but unfortunately she just doesn’t seem to be putting on any more weight.’

[From The Mail]

Meh. I don’t even buy that Jolie only weighs 97 pounds. My guesstimate for her weight is around 110-120 – very slender, with some muscles and some hips and boobs. I mean, could Angelina stand to put on 10 pounds? Yep. 20 pounds? Sure. She would even look great with 30 more pounds. But no matter how much weight she gains, I think the weight usually only goes to certain areas – when she gains weight, it seems to go to her boobs and mid-section, never to her legs and arms. She just has the skinny arms & legs gene. Skinny bitch!

Photos courtesy of Reuters, screen caps from 60 Minutes.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

366 Responses to “Angelina Jolie: “I’m still a bad girl, it just… belongs to Brad and our adventures””

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. NotaBitterBetty says:

    Oh yeah, she and Brad definitely get freaky. She’s just learned there’s a time and a place, and now a man, for everything. Good for them.

  2. Addie says:

    OMG! I love Angie and everything, I realise she is a busy mom of 6 with UN and film commitments all around the world, BUT…..How in the hell did she age herself 10+ years!?!?She is the exact same age as Charlize freaking Theron and looks about 10 years older.

    I know looks are not amoung her top priorities , but what woman chooses to look older than she really is when it is within her means to change that(not surgery)

    Take better care Ang, at least for the kids.

    • Cherry says:

      Actually I was just thinking that her skin looks particularly tight and glowing on these pics. Chemical peel?

    • operagirl says:

      AJ has how many kids? And Charlize only has to look after herself and has never birthed any.

      And I have to agree with Cherry. I think her face looks quite lovely here.

      • tmbg says:

        I also thought she looked particularly good in the interview. The only thing slightly aging on her are her arms and legs, but I don’t think she can help it. It seems to be her natural shape.

      • Mrs. Odie 2 says:

        With all the traveling she does and having all those kids, she probably never gets enough rest. That will age a person.

    • mln76 says:

      She needs to gain weight. Even as a fan I can admit that. BUT surgery isn’t healthy it just gives the illusion of health. There are other stars that are probably as thin but because they are plumped with fillers it’s not as blatant especially since they don’t have her body type.

    • Cali says:

      I don’t know what you are looking at, but she looks beautiful and her skin is glowing. She looks to be in her mid 30’s which is how Charlize looks also. If anything Angie could use a sandwich b/c 10lbs wouldn’t hurt her.

    • Emma says:

      (Blinks) This thing about looking ’10 years older’ is one of several talking points used over and over again by Angie’s defamers. It doesn’t really matter how Angie ‘actually’ looks or what kind of Mom she ‘actually’ may be, the comments just seem to be hardwired in hate … like a malicious Pavlovian reflex.

      • MW says:

        Ha! “. . . hardwired in hate … like a malicious Pavlovian reflex”. So true! That sentence actually gives me a Pavlovian reflex concerning at least one constant commentor, who shall remain unnamed!

      • Freya says:

        ITA, Emma! They have to have something to criticize.
        She looks very nice in these pictures. Can’t wait to see the 60 Minutes interview.

    • what?! says:

      congrats Addie for having one of the stupidest comments on here. firstly, with the pressure society put on women to look young i would be surprised any woman “chooses” to look younger-and if you would enlighten us to non cosmetic procedures that make someone look younger without being dangerous?! women just cant win.

      or perhaps its just shes not as shallow as you and like you say-knows there are more important things and decides to focus on those instead!

      • Addie says:

        Bwwwaaha!!
        I think THAT is a stupid response @what.

        It is a FACT that she looks older than she actually is, noting to do with being shallow or being rude, just a fact.
        Clearly she is busy with other things (as I stated before but whatever)

        Eating right, getting enough sleep and just generally looking after yourself can do wonders. NOT just for looks, but for energy to carry on with a fast paced life – which she clearly has.

      • Emma says:

        No, Addie, it’s not a fact … it’s your opinion, which is filtered through hate.

      • Addie says:

        @emma. Hate? Really?

        I actually like and admire Angie.
        Not love or worship like some, so I suppose that helps with objectivity and not seeing Angie as flawless and close to perfect.

        Just human who yes- looks older than she is for MANY reasons.

    • rmd says:

      10 years! Seriously, if i look like that when i am 46 I will be freakin’ thrilled. i’m not a jolie lover or hater, but i think her face looks amazing here. her skinniness does make her arms look a bit older, but still…a really super hot 46 year old.

    • ZenB!tch says:

      I was thinking she was looking younger than she has been lately. No, not 36, maybe 40? Still she is finally heading in the right direction. Her face and body are starting to fill out. Her cheeks are not as sunken and the new highlights suit her.

      It pisses me off that they are saying she is soooo thin and lives on 600 calories a day because you know what – I totally believe she did but you can see it’s stopped. If the all mighty “they” cared they would have pointed it out while it was happening. I hope she doesn’t relapse because of these stories.

      Next year she will look 36…

  3. Eve says:

    She has great complexion.

    EDIT:

    “I’m still a bad girl… I still have that side of me…it’s just in its place now…it belongs to Brad – or our adventures.”

    Lucky motherf*cker…

  4. Cherry says:

    I know there are a lot of AJ worshippers out here so I’ll probably get yelled at, but: ‘People can imagine that I did the most dangerous, and I did the worst…’ Jeez, Angie. That’s a little dramatic, wouldn’t you say? Especially since it’s not specified what kind of ‘bad’ and ‘dangerous’ stuff we’re talking about. I dunno. Seems to me that she’s a bit over-emphasizing on the ‘I’m still a bad girl’, as if people wouldn’t be interested in her anymore now that she’s a mother and in a stable relationship. No need. She just has to let her work speak for itself.

    • LisaM says:

      But Cherry dont you understand she is the coolest girl on the block. Not only is she the it girl in Hollywood, shes also a mother and works for the UN. Plus she is still the bad girl she always was. She is all things to everyone. No wonder people fawn over her.

      • leetruth says:

        Right on point. This is why people love Angie. She has seen the dark and descructive side of life and withdrawn from it; embracing only the good part.

      • Jaye E says:

        This is actually a common practice for a LOT of celebrities. Being “all things to all people” ensures that they are non-threatening to everyone and thus people won’t find spending their time and money to support said celebrity objectionable.

    • samira677 says:

      That’s funny. People are always saying she’s hiding her past and it’s a lot more serious. Now when she says it was serious people say she’s lying and over dramatic.

      Grazia is even less reliable than In Touch.

    • ZenB!tch says:

      Not an AJ fan here – was definitely team Jen during the divorce even though I can’t stand Jen and would rather hangout with Angelina. I know totally blame BRAD!

      I think she’s complicated like most of us (not Aniston, just the rest of us) and I seem to remember she was using heroin and playing with knives so yes she wasn’t serial killing but she was a danger to herself.

  5. toto says:

    Angelina u rock girl, they r both lucky with each other

  6. cheesecake says:

    Agreed! That quote was HOT!! Of course those two have some cray-cray times together!! Have you SEEN fightclub?? Helena Bonham-Carter is not the same, since!!

    I’d laugh if the bad-side is reduced too weed smoking at “bed time”, while Brad whispers “Sssshhh! We’re parents, stop giggling, they’ll wake up!!”

    You can see that Jolie likes it served on the freaky side, though!!
    I LOVE ANGELINA JOLIE!! I LOVE HER! I LOVE HER! I LOVE HER! HATERS TOO THE LEFT!! This bad girl is my inspiration!

    • Freya says:

      LOL It’s like the two of us (parents) against them (kids).

      I like Jolie, and I like cheesecake too!

  7. lisa says:

    It always amazes me that people thinks she is naturally BIG.. don’t know. I guess that LC image. Thing is when you read accounts from fans or even the people that have interviewed her all say that she is small and petite.

    She has a BIG persona and that makes people think she is this big woman. She is not.

    She is always honest in her answers. He asked a question she answered it. And to be honest. We know about her past because she talked about it. I know a lot of people that experimented when they were young. Drugs.. crazy acts of youth, but looking at what other celebs have done well Angie’s proven antics looks quite tame.

    And I love the quote about her and Brad. Love that they keep the heat going. Sexy as hell to me.

    • tmbg says:

      She is 5’8. While she’s not large weight-wise, that’s fairly tall.

      • lisa says:

        I don’t think she is 5’8.. more 5’7..

      • Emma says:

        @lisa … I think she’s really 5’8″ tall. It’s interesting, but the one thing I noticed most about Angie in the film “Salt,” that I never really paid attention to before, is her height. That’s also the height listed for her at IMDB and other celebrity sites.

      • Cheyenne says:

        Well, how tall is Brad Pitt? Because even when she wears 4-inch stilettos, he’s still a good inch taller than she is. And I don’t think he’s over six feet.

      • Emma says:

        Brad is listed at 5’11” tall. I’d image that if his shoes have any kind of heel on them (like the shoes he’s wearing above), he’ll still be a good inch or two taller than Angie.

      • Cheyenne says:

        @emma: Well, do the math. If the heel on a guy’s shoe is an inch, that would put his height at six feet even. But even when Angie is wearing 4-inch stilettos he’s still taller than she is. So I think stilettos bring her up to 5-10 or 5-11, which would make her real height 5-6 or 5-7.

        It’s interesting that several people who have interviewed her commented that she looks small and fragile in real life.

    • mln76 says:

      She may be above average height but she has a small bone structure and delicate frame. Which is why her arms and legs are so thin even when pregnant.

  8. olivia says:

    I survived? How f*cking DARE you say something like that while promoting a movie about a WAR? You “survived” being a spoiled Hollywood brat who used (uses) drugs and tried to look edgy.

    • lisa says:

      You really need to calm down. When exactly was Angelina a spoiled Hollywood brat.

      and just like others used the word “survive” to speak of coming out or through something why not her.

      and the movie has nothing to do with that. YOU of course are going to make this something completely different. Maybe you should stop following her. You get way to upset.. over nothing

    • Lana says:

      Wow, thats sad of you Olivia. Very desperate and very sad.

    • Nina says:

      EXACTLY! Those people in Bosnia REALLY survived. Those people are still trying to survive. And she makes a movie about them that totally trivializes everything they’ve been through.

      • Stacey says:

        How is she ‘trivializing’ it, just by making a movie? That is so ridiculous and irrational. Take that line of thought, every movie and documentary on WWII and Aushwitz (sp) ‘trivializes’ the Holocaust. Don’t be so ridiculous.

      • Nina says:

        Cause the movie is about a woman that is raped and then she fell in love in her rapist. Do you understand how this affects those women that were really raped? Especially in that war? They had a whole rebellion when Angelina wanted to make a movie about them. They said she’s trivializing their pain because they even couldn’t let their own husbands touch them after the war, let alone rapists. And now, a story about woman falling in love in her rapist is going to be known world wide. And it didn’t even happen. Do you know how painful that is for those women? After they suffered so much

      • mln76 says:

        @ Nina thats not what the movie is about. It’s about two people who met eachother and fell in love BEFORE THE WAR and what happens when they see eachother again in a camp!!!

      • Stacey says:

        “Cause the movie is about a woman that is raped and then she fell in love in her rapist.”
        And that rumor about the plot turned out to be false. So there is no issue.

      • Stacey says:

        Like mln76 says, it was RUMORED that it was about rape, but it turned out to be totally not. People attacked the movie before even understanding or knowing the details of the plot. Rape has nothing to do with this movie at all. This shows how one should always get their facts straight and not just believe gossip, rumor and lies.

      • G says:

        Nina girlfriend, if you’re going to go on a tirade about someone/something, you need to be better informed. The rape story line proved to be just a malicious rumour, AGES ago. Tsk tsk, haters gonna hate.

      • Freya says:

        See? Find out, ask, before posting.

    • Rose says:

      You totally need to let go of the hate before it eats you up inside.

    • Cheyenne says:

      Easy on the haterade, Olivia, you’re really losing it.

    • Derpy says:

      I know it’s beyond useless to even respond to you. Your little hit and runs are getting quite old, one comment early on in a thread, and bam, no replies after that.. but yeah.

      What she said is completely valid. You yourself like to throw her past into various threads about her, including the supposed “drug den” video. Yes, it’s true, Angelina never had to survive through a war. I’m almost willing to be you haven’t ether, just as I have not, and many others that post here. However, life has its experiences and trying times, and you either survive, or you don’t. The entertainment industry has lost great artists, Michael Jackson, Amy Winehouse, to name a few, long before their time was up. All because they couldn’t survive.

      I’m sure many have had some points in their life where they may not have made it through, possibly didn’t want to either, but they survived. There are different levels of horrible things in this world, and trying to compare one persons personal struggles with another, cheapens any survivors story – no matter what it entails.

      • anon says:

        Agree Derpy, well said! Most of us are survivors of one thing or other. I survived being hit by a bus in Brooklyn, NY when I was 15, true story :-). I have always been grateful that I did. I had not even had sex yet 🙂 My entire family would have been different had I died. So though I didn’t survive war; I am still a survivor. Very grateful to be around to see Grandchildren 🙂

      • treasa says:

        Hear hear.

    • Nancy says:

      Angelina Jolie is very…boring she really has always tried to come off as a badass and I have no doubt she’s done “bad” things but she still comes off as more of a wannabe then some one that’s actually a “bad girl”.

    • Cerulean says:

      I guess I am not a cancer survivor then.
      I guess people don’t survive child abuse or survive accidents.

    • Freya says:

      You don’t like Jolie, but you keep clicking on the threads about her. As they say, she owns you!

    • ZenB!tch says:

      Olivia, obviously you have no experience with mental breakdowns. She was hospitalized after BBT. I don’t condone some of her behavior but as someone who has been there, I can usually recognize a fellow sufferer. This is why she is growing on me.

    • Jaye E says:

      Whoa! Deep cleansing breaths, Olivia.

      And how do you draw the parallels between her surviving her self destructive past and making a movie about a war? I don’t get where you’re going with that.

  9. tapioca says:

    Stressed?!! What with no money worries, chefs, maids, nannies and the freedom to do whatever she wants? If only we could all be so “stressed”!

    And it’s funny how all the stories about how badass she was in her youth come from one source – Angelina Jolie. No reports of collapsing outside the Viper Room, no arrests, no visible scars from the “knife-play”. Yeah, I totally believe she almost died from being so zOMG ToTEz HXC!!!11!

  10. hyena says:

    She may always have skinny arms and legs but they were never this bad! she looks emanicated now! Dsmn girl, eat something!

  11. Celebasshat says:

    Angie u look gorgeous alrite but try to eat very often.

  12. Jackie says:

    seems like she has had some good therapy. good for her. can’t wait to see the full interview.

  13. Nina says:

    Oh please, bad girl? Dangerous things? Was she defending USA on the front line? Did she volunteer in Africa, for more than few days? The only “dangerous” thing she did was to take drugs and bang all sorts of dudes and gals. That’s it! She didn’t live in poverty, didn’t have to fight to survive, to get a job, to get a chance, to be someone. She just had some auto destructive issues when she was young, just like everybody does and now she’s promoting it like she was born in the ghetto or something. Pathetic!

    • Wildone says:

      READ girl!!! She was not talking her UN work but the shit she did in her younger days with drugs and cutting herself and whatever else she was in to at that time in her life. Do you know her personally to know all of the shit she was in to at that time because you sure are talking like you do?

      She did survive it she alive today looks at Amy Winehouse and all though other people that didn’t survive and died young.

      • Nina says:

        Those things she “survived” are all the things she choose to do. She didn’t have to use drugs, drink and cut herself. on the other had you have lots of people in America that are trying to survive on a daily basis. Trying to keep a house, to get a job, to survive a gang war… She’s mocking them by saying all this. Wake up people, there’s real world out there. And it’s not Angelina’s real world, far from it

      • Stacey says:

        Nina, please take 10 breaths and get a hold of yourself. Survive is a dictionary word that people use in a wide variety of situations every day. You really make yourself look pitifully desperate for something to base your hate of Angelina on. Please get a grip.

      • Cheyenne says:

        @ Wildone: Reading comprehension is not the Jenhens’ strong point. You should know that by now.

      • mln76 says:

        @Nina There are different kinds of pain in the world. Angelina talking about her life isn’t mocking anyone else. Would you say a person who is worried about paying bills is mocking a homeless person? Or that a homeless person in the US is mocking a starving refugee in the third world?

      • Freya says:

        @Nina

        Stop spinning. She didn’t mock anyone.
        There are celebs who have done (also their choice) drugs and/or alcohol, etc., went too far and didn’t survive. She is saying she is happy she survived whatever she has done.

        As for the real world, she has seen plenty of the real world. She doesn’t live her life sunning herself and going to fashion parades.

    • Kelly says:

      Her commitment to Africa has lasted a hell of a lot longer than “a few days.” She’s been at it for 10 YEARS. And she and Brad have donated a hell of a lot more than the vast majority of “stars” (and even the mega-wealthy like Steve Jobs, who was very stingy and not philanthropic). To name just two examples that come to mind, $2 million to African wildlife (which helps small farmers by preserving biodiversity, in case you’re wondering how it’s relevant), and $340k in aid to Somalia, when the rest of the world has done very little to fight famine there.

    • Wildone says:

      You clearly have not seen or read her other interviews were she talks about how when she went to Cambodia for the first time and saw what real struggles are and how she realized how small and insignificant her problem were when compared to what those people have been though.

      Does it really bother you that she feels lucky to have survived her dark past? I my friend Erica family feel very lucky every day that she survived her drug addiction were her best friend didn’t and died at 20. Do you have a problem with them now too because they feel lucky she alive, I mean how dare they feel lucky the she alive and not six feet under in a box.

    • Who knew *Olivia* had a sister…

      • Emma says:

        LOL!! That was awesome (thanks for the laugh). They’re ‘all’ sisters, don’tcha know? They’re all related in the same delusion.

      • Cheyenne says:

        They don’t call Anistons fans the “Boo-Hoo Sisterhood” for nothing.

        🙂

      • Cerulean says:

        Oh that was good. Lol. We are missing the other sister though. I’m sure she will be here soon…

    • ZenB!tch says:

      As someone who has been there (not drugs) she did have to do those things. My guess is her chemical imbalance is different than mine but before I was diagnosed I would (literally) beat myself up. Mine is anxiety disorder. Hers may be the same or it may be depression. My guess is depression because she got bone thin after her mom passed away.

  14. Addie says:

    I hope that in this interview they focus more on the subject matter of the movie rather than Angie and Brads family and sex life.

    It doesn’t seem like the right time or place to talk about such things…Actually is it really appropreate to talk about your sex life to the world ever?

    • Toot says:

      Just because Angelina said she’s saves the bad girl only for Brad doesn’t mean she’s going to talk about their sex life. That statement isn’t risk-ay at all.

      • Addie says:

        That could be the one statement that media outlets focus on cos it’s “Brangelina” after all, forgetting the seriousness of the subject matter.
        So for a movie like Salt, this would be more ok ,but a movie about a war/genoside… dunno.

    • pamela says:

      Umm, am I missing something? Where did Angie talk about her sex life? As far as I see, it’s our own interpretation regading her comment.

      • Annie says:

        Yeah, I’m sure she was actually talking about going into his sock drawer and matching the navy socks with the black ones. Flushing the toilet when Brad is in the shower. That sort of thing…

    • Emma says:

      Why, Addie? … because the interview proves how substantial and intelligent Angie is, and showcases just how happy she and Brad are as a couple, committed lovers, and parents?

    • Sophie says:

      Totally agree. What a tacky reference to her sex life. If that shit really belonged to Brad she wouldn’t be sharing it with the world.

  15. L says:

    And let the new use of the reply and battle of the Jen hens begin. Where’s my popcorn?

    • Addie says:

      This generalizing everyone as “jen hen”
      is very juvenal.

      You can like someone (in this case Angie) and still not agree with everything the person says and does.

      Its called thinking for yourself.

      • Stacey says:

        No, just look at Olivia and Nina’s posts. Far from juvenile, there is the proof right there of the term. I think JenHen is far too soft though and sounds endearing which is why I never use it. Anistoloonies is more like it. To be as nice and polite as I possibly can.

      • L says:

        As @Stacey said exactly. There’s a big difference from thinking for yourself and being a sheep.

        For the record, I think they are both harmless. But both have their fair share of obsessive fans that come out of the woodwork on these posts. And I find them all hilarious.

      • mln76 says:

        @Stacy I still think they are Angieloonies. They are more obsessed with hating on Angelina than they are fans of the other one.

      • Carrie says:

        Sorry. for some reason my posts are sent to the thread above.

    • tapioca says:

      Really? A lot of people find it’s OK to dislike both – you don’t have to choose!

      • ZenB!tch says:

        No one believes you. I feel like I have been forced to choose – so Team Homewrecker. At least she knows how to dress and can actually do her job well. She may be a fame whore about it but she tries to do good. She is more or less the female Bono.

        Aniston is just annoying, whiney and plays up her so-called desperate childlessness when we all know that is is loving the single life and has no interest in being a mother.

      • Carrie says:

        Team Homewrecker? I assume you mean Aniston, since shes the only one who has actually wrecked someone else’s relationship (Justin Theroux and Heidi Bivens).

  16. mln76 says:

    I love her and am so looking forward to the full interview. I find it odd that people are offended by her honesty about her past- especially those who routinely bring it up to trash her now. We all know she was a wild child as many in their teens and twenties are. And yes whether or not the causes of danger were self inflicted or not she survived a dark time.
    Oh and the 600 calorie stuff is nonsense if she’s eating steak and a glass of wine that by itself is around 600. I definitely think she needs to put in some weight though.

    • MorticiansDoItDeader says:

      I don’t think she’s eating only 600 calories a day, but Kaisers weight estimate is waaayyyy off. I’m 5’7″ and 120 lbs. Usually I hover around 115 (but because I’m nursing my breasts are a much larger and heavier G cup). I gain in my stomach and breasts too, and the only time my arms, legs and face looked that thin was at 105 lbs. point being, I don’t think Angie is much more than 100 lbs and I don’t want to speculate as to why 🙁

      • theaPie says:

        I agree. She is built like a bird and I would guess weighs in at about a buck. That’s it.

      • mln76 says:

        I agree that she’s probably only a 100lbs. I don’t like to speculate the WHY. It could be that she simply has the kind of body type that she needs to make efforts to put on weight-extra meals and weight training etc and doesn’t have time with the 6 kids and the career and travel. It also could be food allergies or over active thyroid. Or of course stress and/or eating disorder. I hate speculating because I have a good friend who eats well but simply can’t gain weight no matter what she does. It took her years to find out that she has a wheat allergy.

      • seri says:

        Everyone has diff body types and heritages. My weight is the same as my friend’s, and we’re the same height too, but she looks WAAAAY skinner than I am, because of her bonestructure and the way she carries her weight. It’s no big deal 😉
        Some peeps look like this, some like that, and we’re all fabulous bitches <3

    • emmabeee says:

      i’ve always admired her honesty and lack of hollywood bs. anyways, i love her and do wish she would gain some weight back. her face is as gorgeous as ever though. & mln, i just wanted to say i always like comments on angelina posts.

    • ZenB!tch says:

      I have lived on 900 before so is 600 any less feasible? Lettuce is your friend. I’m not advocating it. Just pointing it out. I’ve already come out as officially nuts on this thread and that is what people who are officially nuts do. I see a lot of my former self in her former self, even if the manifestations were different. I don’t totally see what she did as “self inflicted”. She didn’t do drugs, cut herself or debase herself by marrying BBT for fun. There was something wrong. Her dad unfortunately chose to make it public causing their last rift. However, she recovered and committed the act that most women revile her for and then her mom and closest confidante died and she lost 30lbs. She seems to be gaining it back slowly.

      I don’t even remember what I was going to say anymore. I just get po’d when people dimish her suffering because she she grew up with money. I think she had money – I am not really sure. Did Voight pay up?

  17. Toot says:

    Can’t wait for this interview.

  18. serena says:

    I think she was talking about drugs. It’s nice that she came clean and that she admits it one way or another. Guess we need more Angelina in showbiz 😀

    Btw she is always so beautiful.

  19. Katherine says:

    It sounds like it could be an interesting interview. As for all this nonsense about her looking so old – she looks like a 36 year old woman with a mature life style. What do you want her to look like? Cute? Surfer girl? She’s always had a mature face.

    She’s discussed her past enough. She doesn’t need to detail it ad nauseum – especially not for people who can’t wait to jump on everything she says or does and turn it into something waaaay worse than it was. Her past drug use is not uncommon and I don’t believe she has said or anyone else has said she used needles – I am sure we are talking about snorting – which can be as dangerous for your health.

    To me her past has never seemed all that wild. She was obviously a moody and sensitive youth but she also seems to have been a sweet and adventurous person who was mostly obedient and close to her family. Many people who develop a strong social conscience or end up in the arts were perceived as troubled teens. That’s more our misperception of their struggle to find their own place in the world than anything they really do.

    • lisa says:

      great comment.

      but of course the vultures are swooping. Taking anything she says to spin. The laughable thing is go to an old thread and you will see them throwing up her past as if it was today. Thread after thread you will see some none fan ranting about what she did years and years ago. But if she even hits at her life and how she has grown and changed then all hell breaks loose. How dare she. Because it is there place to talk about her past. Tabloid stories are their bible. They quote them as Fact, but any positive anything about her is PR spin..

      just so funny how clouded by hate they are. But only as it relates to her. If this was another celebrity they would be saying how great it was that she was talking about how it is possible to move beyond what she did in her youth. But its Angie so they hate.. I guess their hate is their drug of choice.

    • Enny says:

      There’s close to your family, and then there’s making out with your brother on live television. I think there’s a lot about Angie’s past we don’t know, but hopefully it will stay that way. Not that she’s not fascinating, but it’s just not something she should feel like she has to share.

      • Carrie says:

        Do you even know what ‘making out’ means and entails? Because AJ definitely did not ‘make out’ with her brother.

      • Enny says:

        Yes, Carrie, I’ve been around the block a few times. But why don’t you enlighten me.

      • Carrie says:

        Clearly you haven’t Enny, because making out does not include a 2 second closed mouth kiss *on* the lips. Its a lot of heavy petting and other stuff. Not just one greeting kiss on the lips with no tongue. I’m sorry if your mind led you to see making out when it clearly was nothing remotely like it, and read more into a harmless and totally innocent family greeting kiss on the lips. As Jolie said, the ones with the sick minds are the ones with the problem.

      • shay kay says:

        That whole “kissing her brother” thing was just Angie deliberately being “shocking” to gain attention.Same deal with wearing the blood vials with Billy Bob.She no longer needs to do that type of thing for attention so she doesn’t.Both were weird things to do but that was the point and it got her exactly what she wanted.She now gets that attention through being Brad’s partner, a UN worker, and a mother.It’s kind of silly for her to want us to believe she still is a “bad girl.”I get that she’s not a sweet as pie type of lady but that doesn’t make her a bad girl.She seems pretty establishment to me.What exactly is “bad girl” about her now?I think enjoying adventures with your husband is pretty “average girl.”She should just stick with the Mother Theresa image that she’s cultivated because that one will still sell.

    • anon says:

      “To me her past has never seemed all that wild. She was obviously a moody and sensitive youth but she also seems to have been a sweet and adventurous person who was mostly obedient and close to her family.”
      I agree I have seen much worse in other celebrities and people. She has been actively giving back for 10 years. Good job!

  20. Wow says:

    STFU Angie…….some bad gurl you are with veiny arms and skeletal body. Gross!

  21. madpoe says:

    And here I was worried I would not be able to sleep at night but now that I know AJ is still a “bad girl” all is right with the world. I’m not saying anything bad. And not anything good. But wish from time to time over sharing wasn’t happening or mysterious allure about someone still existed more often than not.

  22. LisaM says:

    “I’m still a bad girl,” “I still have that side of me. . . it’s just in its place now. . . it belongs to Brad–or our adventures,”
    Not sure what her sex life has to do with the movie she directed, but at least the comments helps perpetuate the myth of her edginess.

    • WhiteNoise says:

      ‘…the myth of her edginess’

      Exactly. Perfectly put!

      • tapioca says:

        Well quite. Take a girl like Lindsay Lohan – who’s f***ed, snorted, smoked, stolen, whored, self-mutilated, starved, binged, been in jail AND house arrest – or Courtney Love. They DENY they’ve ever had any problems.

        If you remember the 60s you weren’t there, if you say you’re going crazy then you definitely aren’t, and if you have to give yourself the “Bad Girl” label, then you’re as genuinely edgy as a Jonas Brother!

      • Carrie says:

        “Take a girl like Lindsay Lohan – who’s ‘f***ed, snorted, smoked, stolen, whored, self-mutilated, starved, binged, been in jail AND house arrest’ ”

        Sorry, I know those are serious issues but the way you wrote that had me in stiches. 😀

      • Emma says:

        Spoken like the truly young or the truly clueless. Honey, I remember the ’60’s and I ‘was’ really there. The problem with today’s youth, as I see it, is that they have no actual frame of reference for themselves. In many ways–though there are many, many exceptions–they’re just a bunch of white noise.

  23. flourpot says:

    Just because she has money doesn’t mean she can’t be stressed. The woman has a large plate that overflows with responsibilities. I think the ‘I’m still a bad girl…’ line was fairly brilliant. Got our tongues wagging, didn’t it? That was said on purpose for just that reason. Well played.

    And since I’m on about it …Is it just me or, since the Bieber debacle, has this site been filled with new posters USING ALL CAPS ZOMG!! and rilly badz sp3llingz?

    Let’s try and keep it legible and comprehensive, please, newfolks.

    • shay kay says:

      “Well played,” you say and I answer, “Well said, flourpot, well said.”

      lol on the thoughts that we’ve been invaded by Bieber lovers who don’t believe in lower case letters or proper communication efforts! The more the merrier but let’s keep it a site of communication instead of confusion.

  24. WhiteNoise says:

    Artists?! Uh, you’re an actress, Angie. If we’re going to be talking about artists, then we’re moving into eg. Daniel Day Lewis territory. And you are not in Daniel Day Lewis territory. When you’ve got a body of work like his, then maybe you can call yourself an artist.

    I like AJ but my God, sometimes her and Pitt really come across so desperately pretentious and up their own arses. And really, ‘I’m still a bad girl’? If you need to tell people this, then you’re really not. Real ‘bad girls’ just get on with being bad girls, they don’t feel the need to tell the world about it. I’ve always thought her ‘bad girl’ persona was exaggerated for effect.

    • pamela says:

      You do realize you are picking apart her interview based on excerpts, right? You don’t know in what context the comment was made, so I think it might be wise to wait until Monday to vent your displeasure.

    • Stacey says:

      I guess you didn’t realize that acting/drama is part of the umbrella term “The Arts”?

    • Mrs. Odie 2 says:

      She’s savvy enough to know that people are not much interested in her as a director,but they are interested in her as a naughty girl. So by playing into that, she hopes to get people to become interested in her movie.

    • blonde on the dock says:

      Totally agree! I’ve always been on the fence with her.

    • Emma says:

      Now see? When people preface “I really like so and so, but …’ before talking shit about them, what they’re really saying is ‘I hate this person and I think I’m being really clever in the way I’m talking shit about them.’

  25. pamela says:

    LOL, I see the hens have got their “talking points” for the day re the Angie bashing. Now it’s “she’s trivializing the war”. You got to love them…they are nothing if not persistent in their ignorance.

    • Stacey says:

      Yep. And the movie doesn’t even have anything at all to do with rape. The egg is on the haters’ faces.

      • katyalia says:

        Uhm. In that case the egg would be on the trailer’s face. Or are you saying they’re showing that even while in a rape camp she’s getting her kink on?

      • Carrie says:

        Katyalia, the trailer makes no reference to rape. It was only the haters that made mention of rape months before a trailer even showed up.

  26. Paloma says:

    Wish I had her nose.

  27. Wow says:

    You can have her nose, just contact her plastic surgeon.

  28. I.want.shoes says:

    She looks really good. I seriously doubt that she is 97 lbs at 5’7″ or 5’8″.

  29. islandgirl says:

    LOL! The haters are cray-cray lol

  30. Eve says:

    Off topic: the post updating has been kind of difficult to follow ever since the “reply” button was added — I mean, we have to take a look at the entire thread to spot any new comments.

    • Carrie says:

      I agree, its a pain and I wish they would put it back to how it was. Maybe if enough of us ask for it to be reverted to how it was, TPTB will change it back?

      • Eve says:

        It’s annoying, isn’t it? I always have to go back and forth on the thread, trying to find the new comments whereas all I had to do before was pressing “page down” or “end” and then read the comments — starting from the bottom.

      • Cheyenne says:

        I like this format. Before, when someone replied to an older comment, you had to scroll all up and down the thread to see what they were replying to.

    • WhiteNoise says:

      Agree. It’s a pain having to make so much efforts to find new comments. It worked fine as it was imo. I’m behind the ‘If it ain’t broke..’ principle.

      • anon says:

        It is annoying you have to go through the entire thread to see reply comments.
        it wasn’t broken 🙁 agree with WhiteNoise

  31. Nina says:

    Every time a Hollywood director or actor makes a movie about what’s going on in the world, it trivializes that. Cause you’re not smart enough or creative enough to get it and make a good movie about it. I don’t hate Angelina, I just don’t like when people can’t face reality. Enough said, over and out!

    Nina

    • Stacey says:

      You come on here, firstly repeating a nasty lie about the movie being about rape. You were corrected on that.
      Then you flip out about the word ‘survive’, thinking that could buy you an angle. You were roundly ridiculed. Rightly so.
      You don’t know if the movie does the war justice, because *it hasn’t been released yet*, so how would you know?

      It seems to me that you are the one that absolutely refuses to see reality. All you see is LIES.

    • pamela says:

      Something tells me you didn’t have similar sentiments about movies like The Hurt Locker.

    • mln76 says:

      @Nina you have a right to your opinion but I think the opposite is true. I saw Sophie’s Choice at a young age it broke my heart and I decided to read more about the Holocaust. I can say the same about a few other films on different topics such as the Civil Rights movement, Apartheid, and the Gandhi Movement in India. If I hadn’t watched films about these events since I didn’t live through them I would never have been inspired to learn more than the cursory information that was in a history class. If the film isn’t well done it should be judged on it’s merits. But to say that no films should ever be made about X topic is a bit ignorant.

    • pamela says:

      Who knew Angie talking about “her life” would cause such an uproar, and most likely by the same people who were only too happy to bring it up time and time again to bash her? I am having a really good laugh today. Go on Angie with your bad self. LOL

      • Carrie says:

        I know. The haters and loonifers are way off kilter in their minds. AJ is bad for making a movie about rape.
        No, now AJ is bad for making a war movie that has any romance in it.
        Oops, no. Scrap that. She is now bad if her movie *doesn’t* have rape in it. Oh, and she is a bad selfish person for saying she ‘survived’ her wild childhood. Yet *we* are the ones over-reacting and being passionately defensive? Um, how does THAT work? Its sad how the self-proclaimed (but not fooling me) neutrals or moderates only see the defense. They selectively ignore and never comment on these remarks from the haters. They are so transparent, lol.

      • Addie says:

        Wasn’t @carrie the one schooling people on not bringing Angelina up in a Jennifer thread?

        Pot meet kettle.

    • Emma says:

      Over and out? Isn’t that what Olivia usually says? Man! Those sisters are ‘really’ close, aren’t they?

  32. lem says:

    I’m not sure how you can make a movie about the war in bosnia and forgo the entire issue of rape and sexual violence as war crimes. do you people not understand what actually went on during that war? i’m not saying that the story line has anything to do with this rapist love story, but seriously to say that the movie doesn’t touch on the topic of rape tells me that its going to be an incredibly shitty movie that glosses over major issues from the conflict.

    so for everyone jumping down the throats of people who mentioned rape, maybe YOU need to educate yourself on the actual war that this movie is based on.

    • mln76 says:

      I am specifically addressing the allegation that it is about a love story between a rapist and his victim IT ISN’T. From what I have read about it from people who have watched it on the internet it’s very heavy, violent and does go into detail about the suffering people went through during the conflict.

    • lisa says:

      The movie does address the sexual abuse of women.

      the point is IT IS NOT ABOUT A WOMAN FALLING IN LOVE WITH HER RAPIST.

      Just because a rumor is out there does not mean an intelligent person should believe them. This is the thing. Every dumb rumor (negative) is believe. But if it is positive then that according to the none fans are lies.

    • Carrie says:

      Rape, torture and violence happen in every war. Are you saying that if there is one single movie or documentary on WWI, WWII, Vietnam, Boer, Gulf etc that does not have anything included on rape, that its not a real documentary or movie? Are you truly serious? You are honestly being ridiculous and irrational. Not every movie or documentary has rape in it, it doesn’t make them any less valid. A documentary does not HAVE to have rape in it. You seriously are being ridiculous.

      • lem says:

        Yes rape happens in every war. However, prior to Bosnia the world had not seen the widespread systematic use of rape and sexual violence as a tool of genocide and violence that was purposefully implemented by the military. The impact that this had on international law and the way that we view the treatment of women in war was unprecedented. To address the war in Bosnia without addressing the systematic sexual violence would be like addressing WWII in a movie but forgetting about the Holocaust. I’m not saying that every single movie/doc has to address every aspect of each conflict but I do expect them to ADDRESS the major issues in the conflict if they are attempting to portray the suffering of the people during the conflict.

      • Carrie says:

        I can tell from research and family history that rape was indeed AS MUCH a military tool in Vietnam, as it was in Bosnia. Maybe moreso. The issue is that modern time have brought increased technology thus videos, surveilance etc than Vietnam and other wars did which is why people are seeing more details of what war entails. Don’t be fooled. Bosnia didn’t engineer rape as a tool, its just that we get to know about all the nitty gritty details now with modern communication. As I said, there is no difference between Bosnia and any other war when it comes to rape as an aggressive and often as a pre-emptive attack. So again, I fail to see why this movie should be any different from other movies or documentaries.

      • lem says:

        well then i will agree to disagree with you regarding the similarities between vietnam and bosnia rape crimes. i’m not saying one was worse than the other, just that they are different situations (i know sexual violence was a huge problem in vietnam, especially in terms of forced prostitution). my point was that if the movie is going to be set in the camps during the war, then rape needs to be ADDRESSED. i’m not saying it needs to be the focal point of the movie. but again, IN MY OPINION, if you make a movie about bosnian war camps, you need to address the systematic rape that took place in those camps.

        does AJ address the issue of rape? I have no idea. i said IF she doesn’t, the movie will be lacking in my opinion.

      • F5 says:

        “Bosnia didn’t engineer rape as a tool”??? Bosnia was not at war with itself, please stop embarrassing yourself since you’re clueless about the subject.

      • Annie says:

        Lem @ 11:46, At the risk of sounding entirely cynical, the big difference in how it has been treated is probably because it was white Europeans doing it to white Europeans. It’s going on right now in the Congo, where are the headlines? It’s going on right now in the Ivory Coast. The Sudan. It was systematic in Rwanda. In WWII, the Japanese kidnapped thousands of Korean and Chinese women and girls and sent them to goverment approved bordellos to “service” Japanese soldiers. The survivors have yet to get any sort of an apology.

      • lem says:

        Annie: you are completely correct and not at all cynical. although i will point out that everything you mentioned, aside from WWII, happened after Bosnia and wasn’t as systematic as in Bosnia, although it was definitely as common and as horrific.

    • lem says:

      didn’t i say that the storyline wasn’t about the rapist love story? my point was that a few commenters said the movie had nothing to do with rape, which means the movie doesn’t address the issues in the war, specifically what happened in the camps. IF (operative word there people) it doesn’t address those issues, then to me this movie will be shit.

      side note: seriously these AJ posts need to come with an injection of valium because people get wayyy too bent out of shape over a celebrity they don’t even know.

      • Carrie says:

        As I said above. Rape is common in every war, so much its unremarkable, so I don’t see why THIS movie should be any different than all the others, and I don’t see why it HAS to include rape. Why THIS movie?

      • WhiteNoise says:

        I hear ya, Lem. It does make you wonder about the mental health of those posting such passionate defences in response to even the tiniest little bit of criticism! I like and admire much of what AJ does as far as her UN-related/humanitarian efforts go and post accordingly here, but I do find her (and Pitt’s) PR very tedious and eye-rolling at times.

      • pamela says:

        You do realize you are contradicting yourself re the “rape” story?

      • Carrie says:

        Yes WhiteNoise, because reasonably and rationally asking why rape is important for this movie when rape has been committed against captives and their families since WWI, is sooo less sane than attacking an actress for merely saying she ‘survived’ something. Such selective attention of 1 side, its very obvious. Just look at the things that AJ haters have said on here. That takes the cake for irrational responses.

      • mln76 says:

        @lem the people who said the movie has ‘nothing to do with rape’ are probably wrong. I think it addresses rape but not in the context of rape victim falling in love with her rapist. As for rape and war it’s been used as a tactic for thousands of years not just in modern wars-so any war movie that doesn’t touch upon rape whether it be in Ancient Rome, Scandinavia, WWI or WWII or 90’s era Bosnia is to an extent historically inaccurate. There have been taboos about discussing rape which is why we don’t talk about the horrific tactics in a historical perspective-also as the weapons of wars have modernized unfortunately mass rapes have also become more systematic. I think Angelina will address the issue in the movie I agree she would be remiss if she didn’t. But I think everyone should wait and see what she actually produces instead of listening to either vicious rumors or glowing over-zealous gushing from us fans.

      • Heine says:

        @Carrie: Len said the reason why this movie should feature it. Yes, rape has clearly been used as a tool of violence since wars probably began but the Bosnian war, maybe because there was so much media surrounding those particular atrocities, really brought that kind of violence to the forefront and people were forced to recognize it in a way that changed international law. Rape became a crime against humanity.

        Wars often have particular large scale episodes they are remembered for-WWI has trench warfare, WWII-the Holocaust, Vietnam-widespread protests due to tv coverage and Bosnia-systematic rape and genocide.

        No one is denying that rape has happened since war began, but it became a war crime after this particular conflict.

      • Freya says:

        lem, we haven’t seen the movie yet. IF it doesn’t cover or mention rape, it doesn’t mean that the movie is lacking. Many things happen in a war.

    • LAK says:

      As someone who has survived a civil war in Africa, let me say lem that you are talking bullocks.

      Add to that, Rape is something that has happened in every war going back to year dot. If you study all or more conflicts, you see that it is used as a weapon of terror, and is systematically used by the military as a strategic move.

      Without wishing to trivialise or dismiss what happened in Bosnia, i can say that Bosnia wasn’t the worst war because there are wars that were too horrible for words. it’s only that we have seen and received more information as it was happening.

      From a personal perspective SFTU, and on a recent historical perspective i say go look up the history of Nanking specifically google the rape of Nanking, and then come back and tell us about Bosnia

      Apologies to Bosnians on this thread.

  33. spinner says:

    How’s come I can only see some of the comments?? What do I have to do to see the entire thread, please? Right now it says there are 72 comments but I can only see 32?? Help!!

  34. Imelda says:

    The “I’m still a bad girl” could definately explain Brad’s diminishing looks lately!
    Wonder though what that really means – is it booze/drugs/sex or what else could she be referring to – a bit cryptic that one eh.

  35. theaPie says:

    I LOVE that color on her! Look how it makes her eyes pop. Beautiful.

  36. Ming says:

    As long as the movie is better than St. Angies drug-trips – please continue.

  37. 221jazz says:

    Why is it when anyone criticizes Angie they must be “jenhens”..LOL! that tag is old BTW. I think some people dislike Angie because she reminds them of how she lives her life: does what she want, lives by her own rules, does not care what others thinks and she can basically have any man or woman she wants..yeah life is good for Angie. Jealous? you bet your Chalupa I am.

  38. Embee says:

    She’s gorgeous, her weight is troublingly low and I like her choice of projects; however, the statement about how her bad girl side “belongs to Brad” makes me want to throw up.

    It’s like she’s being crushed under the weight of her image. I know it’s a bit rash to speculate on her emotional health, but this statement is emotionally unhealthy, and it is being portrayed as “hot.” I find it sad.

  39. Wait a minute says:

    Is the baaaaaad girl, still shooting up heroine and snorting drugs but only sharing it will ball-less Brad?? Hmmm

  40. NicoleAM says:

    I used to be a huge AJ fan until I got tired of reading interview after interview about how bad she was/is and how much pain she’s experienced. We get it: you were a junkie badass who is sooo wild and free etc etc. Gets old. And while I’m not calling bs on her account of her life, I have often wondered how bad a drug habit could she have had if she was never arrested and more importantly never went to rehab? As far as the cutting, she does nude scenes and wears revealing clothes on the red carpet and in photo shoots…where are all these horrible scars? As someone who has had a prob with this very thing I cannot wear short sleeves because you would clearly see them. I also take issue with the way she has spoken about it to the media. watch her Inside the Actors Studio. When it aired I was still a fan but I balked at how she was so happy and eager to discuss it. I got the impression she thought it was edgy and dangerous. Not to upset her rabid fans but someone who constantly feels the need to remind us how much of a badass she is, well….”The lady doth protest too much.”

    • lisa says:

      Yeah.. you were a huge fan

      lmao

      • NicoleAM says:

        lmao? You find it impossible to believe that at one point I was a fan and then I tired of her and moved on? Why is that strange? I happen to think her UN work is commendable etc all I’m commenting on is this image she perpetuates of herself. BTW, not healthy to idolize someone to the point where you’re afraid to critize them.

      • Lithe says:

        It’s possible to be a fan of someone without being rabidly so.

    • Nikki says:

      Her cutting scars are visible if you look she has a scar near her jugular vein and an x on her arm as for the nude scenes she wears body makeup like lots of people in movies

    • Marie says:

      I totally agree. It is only so much you can take before it all seems so desperate and contrived. She is actually saying she was close to death, but as someone else said, it was through behaviour of her own choosing. And you should wonder how serious it was when she blabs about it purely for attention. My ex had serious issues with self-hurting, and that is not exactly a topic for conversation with anyone really.

    • Emma says:

      Is it just me or are there people posting multiple times here today using different monikers? This seems to be–verbatim–the same as a couple of posts up stream under different names.

  41. Amy says:

    I think she looks absolutely beautiful in that interview. I love the olive green on her.

  42. Mi says:

    God she looks like she’s skinnier than Kate. I mean serisously she looks pretty unhealthy in recent pictures. I hope she gains a couple of kilos because now she doesn’t really look that attractive but some weight would do her wonders.

  43. F5 says:

    holy crap when did J. Jared crazed Jolie fans relocate here? 0__o

    • Carrie says:

      You mean fairness and reason is something you loonifers are not familiar with so being amongst rational people on here is a shock to you?

      • F5 says:

        See, just like that, if you don’t like Jolie, you must be a Jen fan.. typical JJ nut.. this was supposed to be a gossip site where you can like or dislike someone without being personally attacked.
        You felt called out and you just proved my point.
        Fkn sad to have ppl like that here on CB that I think is really kewl site, btw

      • Carrie says:

        Nope, not at all. Experience has shown that most people who go on about ‘Angeloonies’ especially on Just Jared, are FFers and loonifers. I think I hit a nerve, and you proved *my* point.

    • Cheyenne says:

      JJ’s crazed Jolie fans don’t come on here. They think this site is anti-Jolie because it keeps Jolie in perspective and doesn’t worship the ground she walks on.

      • Annie says:

        Lol, as if the Loons here don’t post on JJ, hahaha!

        Or it cold be that they see that the post of chief Bat-Recliner Loon has already been solidly and heavily anchored over here.

      • Cheyenne says:

        @F5: Some of those people on JJ are f*cking nuts. They don’t post on here but they lurk on here. Some of them act like crazy stalkers. They’re the flip side of the psychos who hang out on Female First.

      • Carrie says:

        Annie, and no doubt the Loonifers and FFers from here post on JJ too…

      • F5 says:

        @ Cheyenne
        Idk.. this looks like total JJ infestation, judging by majority of comments 0__o can’t get worse than this??

      • Carrie says:

        F5, read the comments and tell us exactly which posts are written by Angeloonies, and why. Or is it that, like it is with FFers and all loonifers, any fan of Angelina is antomatically a ‘loony’? If you want to see true and unhinged loonies, try FF and Aniston section on JJ. Aniston fans have the most loony and unstable reputation of all. *My* proof, is Olivia, Nina and Mara, for a start. You have no equal for that. So come on. Put up or shut up. What Angelina fan posts equal those 3. Who are the JJ ‘loonies’. Time to put up or shut up me thinks.

  44. Yep says:

    Wow @ the comments. People that don’t like angie or hate her because she’s with their dreamboat have been trashing her for her past since she got with their botoxed dreamboat… Now that she is telling you that it was a wild time and she’s lucky to be alive you’re mad at her. I’m sure you would prefer it if she denied her darker time so that you can continue to go on tirades about it lol oh wait, you are still going on tirade only now you are saying she is lying about the wild past that you’ve been trashin her about lol She looks super pretty in the pix from the interview.

  45. Not Working Hard says:

    Just like Democrats and Republicans should try to understand each other’s viewpoints — instead of endlessly sparring and hating — I’ll just say the one word that has summed up Angelina Jolie for me over the last 9 years: sanctimonious.

  46. Susan says:

    A couple of things:

    I assume that when she saves her “bad” for Brad she is not refferring to doing drugs or cutting with him. So it must mean s*x. Somehow a picture of a very skinny almost 40 year old woman and a 50 year old man getting “bad” – well the picture in my head is not good.

    As for the movie. I personally think that Angie is going about this advertising all the wrong way. Talking about herself will not bring people to the theaters. She needed to go on to 60 minutes with the actors from the movie and discuss how it was filmed, what it meant to them, etc. The people who are going to see this movie will be middle aged mostly, talking about her personal life will not get them into the theaters – however actually knowing something about the film will. Hopefully this whole thing will not just be about her and her love life. We need to hear from the actors to. See the problem is now people are talking about her “bad” instead of the film.

    • Yep says:

      How do u know she wasn’t just joking about still being a bad girl but only for brad? He is a heavy smoker and probably tastes like an ashtray … I bet his lungs are black.

    • mln76 says:

      Well Susan I assumed when she said ‘our adventures’ she meant not only sex but the travels, the children, and the adventure of her life with Brad. It’s useless to know what she actually said without first seeing the full interview. But of course this is CeleBITCHY so we should all be free to speculate.

      • Pat says:

        Hey this is a whole new idea. If she meant that her adventures and traveling with the kids are her “bad” side -then I am one bad mamma!

    • Emma says:

      Why do young people think they’re the only ones having good sex? By saying you can’t picture Angie and Brad having sex at their ages are you really saying that you can’t picture ‘yourself’ having sex at their ages? Sad.

    • Deltona lakes says:

      Again people these are excerpts not the full interview. I’m sure like all other interviewers asked Angie about her past. She unlike other stars probably doesn’t have any stipulations about what they can ask her.. Unfortunately the men in HW never have talk about their drug past i.e Johnny Depp, RDJ. I also agree with Kaiser about her body frame she always had skinny legs and arms when she does gain weight it goes to her boobs,stomach and face.

    • Lucky Charm says:

      Well you know that a woman doesn’t reach her sexual peak until her 40’s, right? I can think of (& want to do!) more “bad girl” things now than I did 20 years ago. With age comes wisdom, and experience 😉

  47. Yep says:

    Angelina should release a clarification saying she didn’t really mean to say anything. Lmao if only she cared about your opinion as much as Pitt does …

    • Carrie says:

      I know. The attacks she is getting on here from her haters over nothing show that one side get really worked up and are very unhinged.

      • Cheyenne says:

        LOL “unhinged” doesn’t begin to describe it. They hate Angie for breathing. They are never going to forgive her for being the woman Brad Pitt loves. They think he’s still secretly pining after his ex-wife.

  48. Reece says:

    How many of the young HW actress sell their left boob to get as many hits, comments and back & forth as ONE Angelina Jolie story gets no matter the site or context?
    I mean ONE story!

    • whatever says:

      that’s not much of a challenge, since 99% of hollyweird is full of plastic boobs..including the subject in matter

      • Reece says:

        Not really what I was going for but, more along the Ashley Greene comparing herself to AJ thing but…ok…

  49. gossip lover says:

    lol at the jen hens going cray cray,angie has that effect on them,go look at people the same age as angie including charlize,kate winslet,milla,eva,they donot look younger than her in any way.what crack pipe have the trolls been smoking,google exist

    http://i42.tinypic.com/11rznzq.jpg

    • MorticiansDoItDeader says:

      They all look about the same age. Except Mila Jovivich (she looks to be in her twenties)!

  50. Sara says:

    She is still beautiful, but again 20 lbs. would bring the “younger” Angie back. She must not be eating very much. I can’t imagine she can keep this up for many more years without it seriously affecting her looks and more importantly her health.

    • MellaYella says:

      Very true but she does need to gain weight but still love her! She would look younger with weight

    • Deltona lakes says:

      Sara how about she has a busy life and not sitting around doing nothing. When she was a little heavier she had no children or just Maddox. I say a little heavier because when she filmed mr and mrs smith she was probably 7lbs heavier(one size) and you can see the veins in her arms in the outtakes (specifically the dance scene).

      • sara says:

        Look, when you are that rich and someone is cooking for you, you can get take out at any hour, go to dinner at any restaurant you want, the issue isn’t time. She spends half her life on a private jet going form place to place. The girl has time to eat, she chooses not too. She looks malnourished and if she keeps doing this she will look really bad in ten years.

  51. Bianca says:

    I wish people could stop judging others before they know them in person. People can go through a lot of personal crises without the whole world knowing!

  52. dede says:

    at 9am this story had 45 comments now its at 140 comments at 11:56am..love or hate AJ you gotta admit people love to talk about her and this is why celebitchy will keep posting AJ stories, good or bad..im pretty sure the interview focuses more on the movie but of course the media only talks about this part smh

  53. Kelly says:

    I have spent a lot of time in Bosnia. The people there are beautiful. I think they would welcome a movie that brings attention to their plight; then and how it affects them now. Would it be better if Angelina made movies about a self-indulged American single woman who has dating “struggles” in her life, and then finally catches her man? It is what it is. How anyone can criticize a movie about something that happened in real life – and, no, there is NO WAY any movie can catch it perfectly, entirely – and pay to go watch stupid, fiction movies about stupid, “funny”, Americans and their love stories/problems? I don’t get the hate for AJ. She’s done more for other people than most people have. Also, what is with the level of education of people on this site? I know it’s a gossip site, but please, people, learn how to spell and use the English language properly. How can you complain about anything at all about another country when you can’t even express yourself well in your own native language; and I’m willing to bet that most of these people resisting the authenticy of a movie about another country – I am betting they don’t know much about their own, American, history at all. It’s not about celebrities, as has been portrayed here. It’s about the process, and the bigger picture.

    • lisa says:

      It’s called a teaser; this is the part that was released. Its only purpose was to get people to watch and talk. It worked. I don’t think 60 Minutes needed to worry though, This interview will be watched. I expect it will be very highly rated. The fans will watch for several reasons. We like her and want to see hear talk period. The none fans will watch with earnest. One so they can whine and Bi@h about every thing she says. Every movement. inflection of the voice. Whatever. They have to have something to rant about come Monday.

      so 60 minutes is marketing this about her past. And if you look and listen to the clip, she made ONE statement then stated she was not going into detail. Besides she has talked about this years ago. And like many have said her “past” is G rated compared to what others have done and said. But its Angie so the standards have to change to attack her.

      and since she had not had a sit down interview like this in OVER a year her fans will be watching. LOL at the persons claiming she did this interview weeks ago to counter a tabloid report that came out this week. Really. think people. Angelina has not been in front of the camera for over a year and a half. No interviews outside one or two print things for her movie yet to be released. In that time there have been hundreds of tabloid stories and yet no interviews. But a story about her eating whatever or not or another “tell all” that never tells a damn thing… made her come out and do an interview weeks before the story was printed. Dang. Angie has some serious ESP.

      OH and all that talk of Angie forcing Brad to travel. Lets see.. Brad is working Angie is not. They have been traveling the last 5 months because of his work. Not hers. but of course she is the one making the family move.

      But logical thinking doesn’t work when you hate is front and center.

      • pamela says:

        lisa, personally I am having a good chuckle at all the ranting and raving going on here. Who knew Angis could cause such a ruckus just by an excerpt from an interview? LOL. I am especially amused at how angry they are that Angie give mention to her “dark period”, when they were talking about it ad nauseum since 2005. They need to pick a side.

      • Camille says:

        Lisa- excellent comment.

    • Annie says:

      Sorry, but why would you think that everyone on this place is an American? And why bring up Rom Coms? You could just as easily bring up films that glorify violence where the heroine holds lots of phallic symbols that ejaculate projectiles when handled properly. I’m sure those are also fodder for deep philosophical pondering.

      • Cheyenne says:

        So go watch some rom-coms and count how many ways the heroine can simper and twirl her hair like an idiot. You sound like you can’t handle anything more substantial than that.

      • Heine says:

        Cheyenne: Action films are just as insubstantial as romcoms.

      • Cheyenne says:

        Heine: Look, honey, if you get off on a pea-brained fluffball grimacing and fiddling with her hair and calling that acting, that’s your lookout. Chacun a son gout.

      • Annie says:

        Heine, my point exactly. Plus they have the added factor of banalizing violence to the point that seeing someone’s brains get blown out is considered “entertainment”. While I’m not a big fan of Rom Coms either, at least they focus on a positive thing (love) rather than a negative thing (violence).

      • Heine says:

        Cheyenne, sweetie, you seem to ‘get off on’ a woman gnashing her teeth and yelling and calling THAT acting.

        As Annie said, I don’t care for either genre but at least romcoms don’t glorify violence and generally convey a positive image of life.

        And did you just learn that phrase a few weeks ago? You used it then and you’re using it now. How cute. You’re practicing your French.

      • Annie says:

        If someone is going to practise their French, you would think they would make the effort to get it right first, lol

        The correct expression is “à chacun son goût”

  54. Angie is awesome!! Thats all

  55. Dalstongirl says:

    I love me some Jolie. I think she’s great. She gets so much stick because she’s a little different and some people don’t know how to handle difference. Anyway, I don’t think she gives a damn what people think. Good for her!

  56. Heine says:

    I hope this interview is mostly about the film and not her.

    Personally I think, considering the serious subject matter, she should not talk about herself outside of directing and writing the film. It seems to take away rather than add any interest. Her fans are now drooling about her ‘bad girl’ fakery but know nothing new about the film.

    Shouldn’t film promotion focus on the film? Especially a war film?

    • blonde on the dock says:

      She’s got to sell the *Brange* for anyone to watch this movie.

    • Emma says:

      Since 2005 people have been raging on Angie for, as they put it, trying to be a Saint by pretending she didn’t do drugs, cut herself, (and my favorite) make out with her brother, wear a vial of blood, engage in (gasp!) bi-sexual activities, use sex to steal men away from women as a game, or in other words … pretend she didn’t have a ‘bad past.’

      So, now that she’s admitting (thought she’s never made it a secret that) she ‘had’ the bad past that people have stated as their reason for not liking her, all of a sudden she’s ‘pretentious’ and just ‘pretending’ that she had the ‘bad past’ you guys have accused her of having?? Right.

      Does anybody else have a headache from the whiplash caused by this reversal of opinion?

      • Heine says:

        Emma: Incorrect. I think she moved on from her bad girl persona when she adopted and became a mother. Isn’t that what she said herself?

        It’s fake that she’s still a ‘bad girl’ in any interesting way and yet she’s trying to play it up in order to sell a war movie.

        I wonder why she thinks she has to continue to sell her private life to sell her movies. Does she think no one will be interested otherwise?

      • Cheyenne says:

        Emma: It’s called trying to have it both ways. First she’s wrong for being bad and now she’s wrong for not being really bad but only pretending to be. I’ve said before about Jenhens that they aren’t very bright, and damned if they don’t keep on proving it over and over and over again.

      • Heine says:

        Cheyenne: You are bound and determined to make other people look bad but you only make yourself look bad in the process.

        Silly goose.

    • Freya says:

      Don’t tell me you’re going to watch the interview, are you? You don’t even like her. Maybe you’ll be looking, looking, LOOKING for things to criticize.

      Don’t tell me you’re going to see the movie. Why would you? So why do you care? Why are you even here?

    • Katherine says:

      When it comnes to public persons like actors, politicians, artists, etc., 60 Minutes usually does profiles of them. I assume this will be a profile of Jolie with some talk about her latest project. But tell me do you also have this objection to other 60 Minutes interviews?

      It seems clear to me just from the teaser CBS has put online that they are going to talk about her entire life in some measure – I mean for god’s sake they’re still talking about immature behavior from her teens and early 20s? That just becomes tiresome and uncreative.

  57. lisa says:

    Ok.. let me say. Friend or Foe

    for those of you that celebrate or not have a wonderful and safe Thanksgiving. be safe and enjoy the people you love and who love you..

    Life is too short to do anything less.
    Gossip is fun..even when fighting for your “side” but it ain’t real life

    PEACE

  58. Maritza says:

    She is beautiful but why does her face look always so shiny,she should try using powder sometime.

  59. Laughing Librarian says:

    Team Angelina forever! I NEVER watch 60 Minutes, but I will be for this interview.
    Brad remains a happy man-c’mon, we all knew why all along!

  60. Kim says:

    I think she plays up her badness and the dark things she did and/or doesnt realize ALOT of people do those same things.

    There are alot of people who go thru a drug and/or sex phase, its called your 20’s (ha-ha) and come out the other side ok.

    • nemera says:

      That’s true.. so why is it that the people that don’t like her act as if what she did in her late teens and 20s is so terrible and unforgivable. That she must wear the some sign forever. They bring it up all the time. But if she hints at it she is playing it up.

      hmmmmm don’t get that.

    • Sherri says:

      yes – Agree . . .she sounds foolish –

  61. I wonder what “adventures” she’s referring to? Hmmm….

  62. Sherri says:

    she’s done a lot of ‘good’ – I respect her for it, nothing can take away from all of that but does she still really need to play up the ‘bad girl’ image at this stage? Her bad girl image has ‘jumped the shark’ – she comes off trying too hard and sounds absurd –

  63. sally says:

    I think she looks great. She’s gorgeous.

  64. NM9005 says:

    Oh well, nothing new here. It’s mixes up the boring interviews and photo-ops she gives us most of the time. I think there’s a bit bad in all of us but it’s good she got rid of the real bad and grew up and expresses her “naughty” ways in a healthy manner.

    As for the weight. She’s naturally skinny but it’s well established she can hold a healthy weight and even gain muscle mass so I think she chooses to be that skinny and I also think Brad likes it. He likes his women skinny.

    If people think that Stewart is going to gain weight after her 30s than what does that say about Jolie? 30+, two pregnancies and she’s skin and bones. I call skinny by choice.

  65. d says:

    Well. These comments have been awesomely entertaining! Meh, I dont really care for her as an actress, though I do admire the charitable work she does. Thats all I can say really, as I dont know her personally like so many commenters on here on seem to lol.

    Having briefly visited bosnia a couple of years ago, I cannot wait to see the film, as I found it to be a beautiful country and was fascinated with the war stories.

  66. Freya says:

    Wow So many comments. I want to read them all.

  67. EUanon says:

    I’m 5’9, 105 and 38 years old, and I’m AJ’s body type all over (with accompanying corpse bride collarbone, arms and hands). I’ve been trying to gain weight to no avail for all my life, although I think I could have done so had I lived abroad (I eat mediterranean with the occasional burger or pizza, lots of bread and viennoiseries though), and I believe it is really unfair to disregard body type variety, or worse, vilify someone that could just as well be also affected by stress, hormonal imbalance, thyroid complications and the likes. It’s just unfair, trust me.

    • Cheyenne says:

      Ten years from now your metabolism will go south, your weight will go north and you’ll long for the good old days when you could eat like a horse and not gain an ounce.

    • Medusa says:

      10 years from now doesn’t do anything for NOW.

      It’s true, it can be really really hard for some people to gain weight. It can be really frustrating, believe me.

      Do you really think someone who feels like they are too skinny feels any different than someone who feels they are too fat?

      • Cheyenne says:

        Trust me, I not only sympathize, I empathize. I’m 5’6″ tall and I used to weigh 107 lbs. I couldn’t gain weight no matter how much I ate. My metabolism was off the charts. When you get older your metabolism slows way down. I’ve been wearing a size 6 for the past 15 years, but now I have to watch it.

  68. Nikki says:

    The interview is not just with her she has Rade, Zana and Goran there as well.

  69. Camille says:

    I have often wondered if people would still have a hate on for AJ if she and BP had broken up quickly after them getting together, instead of them still being together tons of kids and years later. Hmmm.
    After all disliking someone for their wild past and for being skinny doesn’t seem like much of a reason to hate/dislike someone to me :\. Its not like she isn’t honest about her past, unlike Lohan for example.

    As for this interview, I look forward to hearing what else she talks about. She is so articulate and always (in my opinion) sounds intelligent and classy. Love that about her. Oh and I love her laugh too, so naughty hehe.
    She also looks beautiful. Gorgeous skin. But yes she could gain a bit of weight. Better than having the opposite of that problem though huh.

    • Cerulean says:

      She can’t win with some people. I agree with you. No matter what she says or does. Makes me like her even more.

  70. Sara says:

    I don’t agree that she looks older than her natural age, I just think some woman in their 30s strive to always look 25. Some people also look younger than others. I have a friend who is three years younger than me and people have guessed her age to be five years OLDER than mine because she has crows feet and just looks older. That’s genetics though. I mean, I smoked, drank and tanned through my 20s and most people still don’t think I’m in my 30s. My parents looks really young for their ages too.

    Either way, Angie is still 100 times more beautiful and talented than any other actress of her generation. I can’t think of another actress as impressive and as beautiful as her. She’s one of a kind. Not to mention the charity work, or the kids. I mean come on, she’s great.

  71. G says:

    I prefer to actually see a movie before I review it.

    60 Minutes? Is that still on. Only their geriatric audience can think that this “being naughty for my man” tidbit is remotely racy.

    Apparently there is another G……

  72. teri says:

    Angelina is an open book, nothing about her that she already hasn’t said herself. I really like her and how honest she is even if it wasn’t so good. Love the JP family. Everybody have a wonderful Thanksgiving.

  73. Ranga says:

    I like her, I used to think she was smoking hot, she looked amazing with those Tomb Raider muscles (minus the giant inflated bra though). She’s REALLY REALLY thin, I don’t care what anyone says. She has been so thin that it’s actually distracting in some of her movies. I think she might be one of those people that just eats her kids leftovers or something, just not a food lover 😀

    • Cerulean says:

      My husband is the kind who drops weight very fast if he doesn’t shovel in a lot of food. He’s naturally skinny so he can look gaunt very quickly. I get the feeling she is not a foodie and that she has a fast metabolism. Some people have to fight to be average weight. I think she needs to supplement her diet to get bigger. She is looking better now though. She was scary thin for a bit.

  74. Yiarr says:

    She seems cool as a person – but I just don’t like her as an actress anymore – A Mighty Heart was just awful!

  75. ruby says:

    She is so FAKE and her fangirls are the biggest bunch of fooled sheep I have ever seen.

    • Carrie says:

      No one is more fake than Aniston and her fangirls are the most easily manipulated sheep and brainwashed fools there are.

  76. Mari says:

    Is it just me or her face has improved??

  77. Pixiestix says:

    Am SO tired of her attention getting phrases “I save the bad parts for Brad and our adventures”…who CARES?

    Over it. Next.

  78. Mara says:

    The Voights are weirdos. They are just as gross as the Kardashians but they are “artistes” so they get a pass.

    Jolie is not 36. She’s 40-41. Havens is 42. She shaved off a few years from her official bio. She and her brother were not photographed the way celebrity kids are now but you can search for articles written between Gia and Girl Interrupted where the references to her age stay the same through the 90s.

    Either way, she peaked in 2004-2005. She’s not going to get that teenage boy audience back. She might try learning to act.

    • Carrie says:

      Wow. You people are really losing your grip on reality. Angelina’s birth was documented, so we all know she is 36. Clinging to inaccurate articles won’t change that. Angelina is as popular as ever and I know that really eats at you. Deal with it. The only weirdos are the small-minded unhinged bigots such as yourself.

    • F5 says:

      Fascinating, Mara, that would splain why she looks so much older ( that and hard life, of course)..
      anyway, happy Thanksgiving all 🙂

      • Carrie says:

        And you expose your self as a loonifer by entertaining and believing that unhinged bs. But, loonifers are truly gullible sheep, so no surprises there 😀 Calling any Angelina fan a loon, but you are the one believing such conspiracist unstable bs from a clearly unstable Mara. That you would entertain and pay mind to that rubbish exposes you as what and who you truly are. Yep, we know who the TRUE loons are. Thanks again for proving our point. 😀

    • Freya says:

      You really meet all kinds of people on the internet! Here is one who decides how old other people are.

      Jolie was born on 4 June, 1975. Pitt on 18 December, 1963. You can google it, Mara, and why are you here if you find them gross.

    • mln76 says:

      Angelina is one person who can’t lie about her age because she’s been in the public eye her whole life. Her birth was in magazines and she attended the Oscars with her dad when he was nominated in 1985 are you saying she’s 15 in this picture or is the Academy in on the conspiracy too 🙂
      http://www.eonline.com/celebs/jon_voight/112516#photoSection

      Nice try why not take that theory to the crazies at IUC or FF?

    • Cheyenne says:

      Sweet Jesus, are you off your meds??

    • Lucky Charm says:

      Hahaha, so you’re saying that when she was in the the movie “Looking to get out” with her dad, she was really an 11-year-old pretending to be a six-year-old? I think you are confusing her with Chelsea Handler, who is 41 pretending to be 36.

  79. catt says:

    After spending hours reading all of these comments and rants I just gotta say it ” Angie did not bring up her bad girl image…THE INTERVIEWER DID. And when he asked her she didn’t even want to talk about it she said/ I like the selective hearing the Angie haters have.
    If she wasn’t asked she would have never brought that subject up I’m sure she is sick of people asking her about it.

  80. DD says:

    wow 250+ comments, is this a record?

    In regard to being a bad girl for Brad; I just wonder how bad can you be when your partner has as much personality as a Ken Doll.
    Angie needs to let go of her perception of being a “bad girl”. Barbie isn’t considered bad by any means, and her “bad girl” fans have probably left a long time ago.
    Needless to say, she looks ravishing in that red dress.

    • Sakyiwaa says:

      Uhhm, actually, Brad ‘the Ken Doll’ has THE record on CB. His back-to-back threads on CB in the aftermath of his Parade mag interview drew in close to 500 comments… each. And there I was… thinking people were so disinterested in anything Brad-Ken doll ever had to say…(shrug)

      As for this particular thread though, it has got to be ANGIE-BARBIE’s record on CB. She’s been pretty consistent in the 100+s so far, along with a few randoms. Gotta say though, that no other female celeb has logged this number yet. Not mentioning any names… just no one else has.

      And her PR drive is just beginning… Wow, I can’t wait for more Fun with Barbie and Ken (cough)!

      • Annie says:

        And he NEVER would have gotten that many comments if he hadn’t brought up his ex-wife in the interview, however obliquely.

        It’s no wonder the tabs do everything they can to keep the Triangle alive.

  81. MoMo says:

    YAWN.SNORE.ZZZZZZZZ.
    Brangelina has been so over exposed for so long. We knew years ago that she was wild, dangerous, illegal etc. Whatever. Same with Brad. We know he’s a stoner. Lol, I’d so much rather hear tales of the Moore-Kutcher or Paquin-Moyer threesomes.

  82. Freya says:

    I see Angelina’s haters say that she isn’t or is no longer a bad girl, so we can expect, we can be sure they will never again mention all the ‘bad’ things of the past they used to go on about!!!

    • Carrie says:

      Agreed, if only that were true. Their form post template is shes a drug addict (which shes never actually been), ’tongues’ (roflmao) her brother, wears ’vials’ (it was one tiny droplet pinprick of blood in the center of a locket, no actual vials) of blood etc etc. You can see the form letter template all the time and its obvious that the sheep haters are parotting the lies spoonfed to them and don’t think for themselves, because none of the template of worn-out old lies are true or stand up to scrutiny. It doesn’t matter how many times the form template is posted, it will never become true. Of course they will keep posting the template because they cannot see their mental and moral gymnastics and hypocrisy in themselves.

  83. Phyllis says:

    Angelina Jolie is the most beautiful woman in Hollywood right now, hands down. She directs, acts, is a mom of many kids, has a hot celebrity hubby, manages to visit and support every country out there. She is amazing. I don’t care what she does in her personal life. She is inspiring.

  84. Medusa says:

    She’s always had kind of a weird body.

    Even in Gia — thick and almost dense and stiff mid-section, slimmer extremities. Kind of boyish, just with big boobs.

  85. Zoe says:

    I’m not a jealous gal… I could care less that Brad Pitt is famous, attractive, has money and a cool job. But honestly, he gets to come home to Angelina Jolie at night, and that’s got to be pretty special.

  86. mew says:

    People aren’t really too busy to forget to eat. Choosing to work instead of food is not about memory. It’s a decision.

    Anyway, well, whatever is anyone’s opinion about her, she’s been at least more real than the fakies in Hollywood land. She’s been through thick and thin, not been playing plastic barbie doll but been a real human being and still is. She has obviously grown. It’s much more fascinating than the fabricated PR lives most live.

    • Zelda says:

      I actually forget to eat all the time.
      People find this insane, but I’m not really into food. I hate the feeling of being full, and eating is a meh activity for me. Thus, if I’m hungry and busy, I usually just carry on and forget about it soon enough.

      • theaPie says:

        Same here. Unless I get shaky or smell something delicious I’d rather just get on with what I’m doing. Sometimes I wish there was a pill I could take that would contain all the calories and nutrients I need for a meal because all the shopping and prep are way too cumbersome.

    • Lucky Charm says:

      Sorry, I have to disagree with you. It is actually quite easy to forget to eat. I frequently get so busy and focused on what I’m doing that I forget to eat, I don’t choose to skip a meal.

  87. Addie says:

    I have a question.

    Does the interview & interviewee go through the talking points before the interview takes place??
    The questions and responses are really weird considering the heavy subject matter of the movie being promoted.

    They don’t gel together. This is a war/genoside theme, with a lot of people watching to hear about what makes this movie worth watching, but again the story turns to the irrelevent matters.

    • pamela says:

      Addie, since NO ONE has seen the interview in it’s entirety yet, why don’t you wait until Sunday, watch it, pinpoint ALL your criticisms, (as I’m sure you will have lots of them) and THEN you can vent. At this point, it’s all just conjecture. You CLAIM you like her, (right) so with that in mind, you may be pleasantly surprised with the interview.

    • Cheyenne says:

      Addie, you keep harping on the same theme to no purpose. You keep whining about the content of the interview before you’ve even seen it. Did it ever occur to you that it may have been the interviewer who brought the whole thing up? Wait till after the interview airs before you criticize her, and for pete’s sake, try using your spell checker once in a while.

    • Addie says:

      Are we watching the same clip above??
      Also what is the headline of this thread focusing on?
      They DO talk (even if no for the complete interview)about irrelevant things.

      The question is- Does Angie know before hand? Cos this passed week, the media are now focused on her wild/bad girl passed, not a word about the movie.
      I don’t think that SHE would have wanted that to be the case.

  88. CHRISTIAN_GIRL says:

    She has the 3 main stars of ITLOBAH at the interview too. The movie WILL be discussed.

    She is smart to sell it this way. A foreign unknown cast in a feature film not in English about a horrific war, Right, People will want to see it because of her, if no more than to criticize and look for stuff. However, when the movie proves to be fantastic, can I have bacon and pancakes with the egg on your faces?

    I swear, to even have your film and unknown actress mentioned as a award contender is the business. Clint Eastwood said he was amazed in their interview. And those who have seen were also blown away. 60 minutes is the perfect avenue, whereas lame talk shows are not. Sunday, I will watch just like you.

    Happy Turkey Day.

  89. casey says:

    this woman is just so beautiful..classic beauty in hollywood.love you angie.

  90. casey says:

    i love to watch angie’s interviews.she is so smart and you cannot stop staring at her extraordinay beauty.how can someone be this beautiful.its unfair.

  91. Sakyiwaa says:

    Angie! Dayum! I’m SOOO late to the party! Love her. She rocks… wish I could watch her entire interview! I guess wanting her to gain weight, would be like me wanting Rosie O’Donnell to lose weight. Why is it okay to nitpick skinny people and not fat people? WTH???

    Of course, she’s BADASS. she’s the only legit HW BADASS FEMALE I know. Whereas BADASS is not equated with F*CKERY in my dictionary but with LOYALTY, COURAGE, UNABASHEDNESS, DIGNITY, PRIDE and an awesome CAN-DO SPIRIT…

    I’m not a fan of Lohan and all the other people who still do ACTUAL f*cked-up stuff. And if ANGELINA JOLIE was STILL that way, I wouldn’t be a fan… instead she does awesome things with her money, time and fame… go figure.

    That’s a real badass person. A person who doesn’t live life like a NUMB SHADOW and makes changes that MATTER.

    Go AJ. you’re FAB!

  92. sara says:

    Wow, the number of comments here just go to show whether you like her or not, you are still talking about her. Her star power is amazing.

    • NotaBitterBetty says:

      Absolutely. No one in Hollywood commands more attention than her. Nobody. And all she does is pretty much get on with her life the way she sees fit. I think she’s pretty kickass.

  93. donnamae54 says:

    I can’t believe Angie said what she said It seem to have gone viral. Why did she do it, her comments are reaching the four hundredth mark. Why, did she do it? I can only imagine what some people had to say, not all of them good some are down right vile and horrible. Anyway she didn’t have to say what she said by the silly grin on Brad Pitt’s face we all know what’s going on!

  94. casey says:

    i admire angie more because she’s always been honest about her past and has made her life better now.she’s an inspiration to me.her fans love her unconditionally and will always support her no matter what.europe loves you miss angelina jolie.we cannot be angry or disappointed with you despite the attacks of the media and the trolls.it has made us want to defend you more instead.only non american fans like me has to improve our english.but i must admit my english has improved a little because of wanting to defend you from the bashers.

    • Cheyenne says:

      Casey, what country are you from? You express yourself in English very well.

    • Your skills are greatly improving!! I admire you,I know learning a second language isn’t easy. I’m trying to learn Scottish Gaelic.It is very imporant to me now that I’m expecting my first child.And,I have no help and very little resources.Tip* always capitalize the first letter in a word when starting a new sentence,and capitalize the letter I(when referring to yourself).Oh,also capitalize the first letter in a pesons first and last name.Damn,I sound like a mother hen.Lol!

      • Cheyenne says:

        Is there a big difference between Scottish Gaelic and Irish Gaelic? I understand Gaelic is on the list of endangered languages.

        Congratulations on the new baby!

  95. Cheyenne** I have a friend who I work with that speaks Irish Gaelic.(He’s from Ireland).He says that there is.I wish that weren’t true,because then I’d have someone to help me.All of my family history died with my grandfather(he died before I was born,and my father was very young).If not for a great Uncle it would have stayed lost forever.Sometimes,I feel so lost that I feel like crying.I know that my kinsmen are a great Scottish clan,and I feel as though I’m on the outside looking in.And,I don’t want that for my child.I want him to know who he is.Somehow,I have to remedy this.Sometimes,the past ways heavy on us all,doesn’t it?(Oh,thanks for the congrats.I cannot ever remember being so happy.)

    • Cheyenne says:

      One of the most precious things we can pass on to our children is our heritage. I have some friends in the Midwest who are teaching their new baby Hungarian but they both speak it. But you don’t have to speak the language to help your child take pride in who he is.

      • Seal Team 6 says:

        Irish is a bit more complicated than Scottish Gaelic, especially certainly spellings. I know a bit of the former, and hope to know it better one day.

  96. Nymeria says:

    She sounds a lot less pretentious when I imagine her speaking with Cartman’s voice. “I’m mostly a bad girl at night… Mostly.”

    • Derpy says:

      Wonder what its going to take for me to talk myself into the poster they’ll put up at the theatre. Want that so bad, I love it.

  97. helli says:

    She is still unstable to me

  98. helli says:

    One more thing, Brad must be regretting leaving Jen, a normal woman. He must be suffering from buyer’s remorse by now 🙁

    • Cheyenne says:

      Thanks for the best laugh I’ve had all week.

      (P.S. I’m not laughing with you, I’m laughing at you.)

      • helli says:

        You may laugh but you know its true. Well too late for Brad, Jen is now taken plus she wouldn’t want him anyway. Have you seen the state of him lately?

      • Cheyenne says:

        Yes, you poor deluded Jenhen, I’ve seen the state of him lately. He looks like a very happy and content partner of a beautiful, vibrant woman and the father of six healthy, active children.

        Brad is on record as having said on several occasions that his marriage to Aniston was a low point in his life, so it’s doubtful he would want to return to anything that reminds him of that time, including looking like a pretty boy playing Ken to her Barbie.

    • Carrie says:

      Um, didn’t you read his interview from a couple of months back? He couldn’t have made it MORE than clear that Aniston was dull, he was unhappy in his marriage, and pretending. Doesn’t seem like missing her, to me. You are inhabiting a fantasy world. He has a REAL woman with Angelina. The gorgeous, classy, talented person who gave him children which the ice cold malicious bitch Aniston wouldn’t do. Far from regretting it, Brad’s boasting makes it all too clear he walked on and never looked back. Its Aniston that is the one with her current balding greaseball that has buyers, I mean ‘buyers’ in every way, remorse. She chose her career over Brad and children and you just KNOW she regrets it til this day. She had a good man; yet she chose her career. Aniston is a homewrecking vain, self-absorbed conniving and manipulative psycho. If you think Brad would ever return to that rubbish on legs, you are dreaming. Brad upgraded and moved on. Aniston is in the gutter where she belongs.

  99. helli says:

    He needs to take those 6 kids as far away as possible from her and have someone put her into an asylum for a very very long time ala Losa Rowe (Girl, Interrupted). She played herself there.

    • Derpy says:

      I’m going to chalk your post up to some weird triptophan induced lapse of breathing, thus depriving you of oxygen and shutting your brain down. Either that or some poor soul put a boot to your head at your local Black Friday sale.

      I’m pretty positive someone else here is going to come to Angelinas defense and explain how people can grow and change, so I’m going back to gaming.

      • Linnie says:

        I am going to come to AJ’s defence. Who hasn’t done stupid, immature things when they were young and then become a responsible, caring adult? I know I did. I’m lucky I “survived” my younger years. It’s more the norm than starting out life like you are already 30 years old. Many of the postings here are an indication that some of you are still really young or that many of you have yet to grow up so you just don’t get it, yet. Hopefully those of you have not yet reproduced because if so, I despair for your children.

      • Cheyenne says:

        I couldn’t believe what I was reading. She actually makes olivia sound sane!

    • theaPie says:

      Would you be projecting a bit here dear?

  100. G says:

    The jenhens imagine themselves to be like Jennifer Anniston because they’re the same boring flavour of vanilla “normal woman.”

  101. Nikki says:

    Profile of the interviewee
    The show also features profiles. The profiles are often of celebrities and offer up a biography of the figure, focusing upon the celebrity’s early life story, obstacles, and choices, rather than offering a simple publicity platform. Non-celebrity profiles usually feature a person who has accomplished a heroic action or striven to improve the world.

    Occasionally, if a celebrity has written a book or has a current film in release, the segment featuring them will also promote the book or film. However, the celebrity in question will always be profiled in detail, and never appears on the show simply to promote his or her product.

  102. Mitch Buchanan Rocks says:

    Angelina looks fantastic in that shade of green in the first pic, it really brings out her eyes.

  103. caitrin says:

    Though there was no way i could get through ALL of these comments, what I was able to read was pretty hilarious! People calling each other THE lamest names:Jen-hens? Angeloonies? REALLY? Certainly not referring to all of you posters, at ALL, but for the ones who toss such vapid names around, I SERIOUSLY have to question your level of maturity: Are you in highschool? I suppose it would be TOO confusing and mindboggling for those of you who accuse all of us who are not in blind love w/ Angie of being”Jen-hens”, but I happen to dislike both women EQUALLY. (The real world is NOT, in fact, divided into 2 “teams”: those who prefer one overrated actress over the other.)IMO, AJ is pretentious and sanctamonious and self righteous, as well as a *very* mediocre actress: If not for her beauty and name, she would never have made it onto the movie screen at all.What I DO like about her is that she seems very charitable and concerned about the plight of people in impoverished countries, and that she brings badly needed attention and charity to such places and causes.Because of this, I admit I like her more than JA, who seems shockingly self-absorbed, petty, and selfish, therefore even worse than Jolie, in my eyes.(And is perhaps an even slightly worse actress than AJ.)
    But, I suppose, since I don’t naively and blindly worship Jolie and the earth she walks on, this is a little confounding to those of you who would automatically like to label me a “Jen-hen”, for not idolizing your holy one? PLEASE. Since when must the world–and people–be all black and white, good and terrible, wrong and right? Just b/c one favors one celebrity over another, does NOT make them all the same sort of people, automatically loaathsome and pathetic simply b/c they don’t adore the same “star” as you do.Since when does such a trivial thing have to make you all rivals, even *enemies*–hurling insults at each other as though you were fighting over something revolutionary or holy, or even remotely important? Those of you who take this whole thing onto “Team…” level, and verbally assault those who don’t share their “team”, please grow up:you just make yourselves look *so* vapid, and ludicrous. Yes, it’s amusing to me, so much made of so little, such completely unnecessary conflict and even mean-spiritedness, the tedious, predictable insults aimed at one another–but it gets old very quickly, and pitiful, even sad. The world is filled with so many, so much more important–and far more divisive—issues than who prefers one overpaid, overhyped celebrity to another! Why become petty and even mean to one another over such a tiny, tiny thing as this: a dispute that you,yourselves–no one else– invented, and contine to quarrel about, to maintain?

    • NicoleAM says:

      Dear God! A voice of reason! This site is pure entertainment to me. I rarely even care enough to post. I can’t for the life of me imagine why ppl are taking this shit so seriously. Huge eyeroll on my end too over those ridiculous nicknames. I get a much bigger kick out of Michael K over at Dlisted ’cause it’s entertainment to him too. He pokes fun at everyone and doesn’t take it seriously BECAUSE IT ISN’T.

    • Lucky Charm says:

      Wow, such a long post from someone who claims to be completely uninterested in this actress, yet here you are not only reading but commenting! I generally don’t have much to say, if anything at all, about someone I’m not interested in. Certainly not a long post like yours. But that’s ok, you don’t have to like Angelina, she has enough fans that she won’t miss you.

      • NM9005 says:

        @Lucky Charm:

        Disagree. When you don’t like something you can state the reasons why. Like when somebody doesn’t like a book, why wouldn’t that person be allowed to have read it completely and give his/her opinion to a person who does like the book? Same thing, different subject. I think Caitrin made a good statement about not wanting to jump on the “team blabla” bandwagon. She makes more sense than those who claim to hate a certain person (you know what I’m talking about) yet their posts are featured many times in the threads about the person they dislike. Even more so than fans. I bet a few of the regular posters who spew their hate on every thread have a much longer comment than Caitrin when pasted together. In fact, I’m going to put that to the test =) just for myself for shizz and giggles.

        And “she has enough fans that she won’t miss you.” is written like you actually think Jolie gives a crap about her fans as individuals =). That she wants to get to know you, reads this blog and acknowledges you because you happen to like her. Umm, weird.

  104. Maya says:

    I love how honest she is. And I think she looks gorgeous in the interview.

  105. Grace says:

    Oh Angelina, people are so not impressed when aging female entertainers try to seem “naughty.” Just ask JLo.