Lindsay Lohan’s leaked pictorial causes a major headache for Playboy

GO HERE to see Lindsay Lohan’s full NSFW Playboy pictorial. Just go and come back, because we have some things to discuss.

You see, I didn’t talk about Lindsay Lohan’s Playboy shoot on Friday for several reasons – first of all, the full photo shoot was leaked DAYS before Playboy wanted it released, and chances were that Playboy’s lawyers were considering lots of legal actions to get the images taken down, considering that most people wouldn‘t buy the magazine if they could see all of the firecrotchy images online – TMZ even reported that Playboy was “freaking out” because they stand to lose a lot of sales. However, it looks like Playboy has just decided that now that the leaks are already out there, they should just go with it. Hugh Hefner tweeted that LL‘s pictorial was going online early, the newsstand issues would be released earlier and that the issue “will make the perfect Christmas issue for men in your life – father, son, husband, boyfriend, whoever.”

Another reason I didn’t want to talk about it: Crackhead exhaustion. I mean, the “leaks” of the photo shoot are NOT some budget photos-of-photos crap – these are full-on quality scans of the actual magazine. Someone (cough) got their hot little crack hands on an advance of the mag, scanned the pages and released them. It’s such an obvious crackie move. She’s so obviously pleased with herself.

Now, shall we talk about the actual photo shoot? The shoot is based on the famous (infamous) Marilyn Monroe shoot with photographer Tom Kelley. In Marilyn’s shoot, she was very young and fresh-looking, lounging around on satin sheets, looking kittenish and rather adorable. The Cracken photos look like she’s been dipped in bleach and flea dip and then Photoshopped within an inch of her life. Don’t get me wrong – I was genuinely surprised that her body looks that good. Even if there is the motherlode of ‘Shop, LL’s got the basics for a bangin’ body. I was especially surprised with how pretty her boobs are, honestly.

BUT THE FACE. The face is rough. The face is trashy. The face is all kinds of terrible. Those horrible lips, that red lipstick, the lack of any real seduction or joy in her eyes. She’s just awful. Also – she didn’t show vadge. Does that matter? The shoot is just all T&A.

I also skimmed the “interview” with LL – I don’t even care enough to transcribe it. She compares herself to Marilyn, of course, and talks about how she was really mixed up when she was 18 and 19. No mention of 20-25. One quote: “I have no idea why there is this fascination with everything I do.” BECAUSE YOU’RE A CRACKHEAD MONSTER.

Photos courtesy of Fame, WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

166 Responses to “Lindsay Lohan’s leaked pictorial causes a major headache for Playboy”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Laurie M. says:

    Her rear end is quite pointed in the fourth photo…what’s up with that?
    I nominate this photoshop artist for a major award. He made a crackhead look passable.

    • si says:

      i noticed it too. but in the last pic, u see the full photoshop. notice the niples are not the same from the pics above. they are bigger….

      • Laurie M. says:

        You are right – her nipples are much different in the last pic!! That is a massive change in the size – she went from dime size to at least quarters (if not bigger!). As a woman I will say changes like that are NOT normal. How bizarre!!

      • David Daniel says:

        The photoshop errors on nipple size make the whole thing a joke. Her nipples are bigger in a smaller photo than they are in a bigger photo. Given all the photoshop all over her body, her photos are counterfeit and Playboy should only sell for monopoly money, not real money.

    • duncecap says:

      A common trick for a perky butt is to photograph a model’s ass as she’s laying down or something, and then graft that image onto another pic where she’s standing or something. It creates the illusion of shape and tone. I’m guessing LL’s booze soaked ass is so saggy it was photographed upside-down then added in.

  2. Laurie M. says:

    Also, am I the only one that thinks the “leaked” photos are for publicity? I have a sneaking suspicion Playboy planned it this way, because who would actually buy a copy to see her?!

    • girl says:

      Agreed. This is just really sad. She’s photoshopped to within an inch of her crackheaded existance. The only real similarities with MM is that they are both troubled. MM is an icon. LL is just sad. She looks dead inside in these pics. No amount of Photo-shop magic will fix what’s wrong with her.

      And besides that, who the hell buys Playboy for their father? Eww.

    • OfficialBitch says:

      Was OBVIOUSLY PLANNED. So fake like the photos. So irrelevant, like PLayboy.

  3. CandyKay says:

    I also noticed the boobs! They look very good, but I guess it’s hard to mess them up when you’re only 25.

  4. Zoey says:

    She has chicken legs and no ass. I think the photos are pretty bad considering they have been photo shopped, it makes me cringe to think of what the untouched photos look like. LL, please move to Siberia and disappear.

    And, she has NO muscle tone. Not even for an average person…

    • NM9005 says:

      I have a feeling the untouched photos will surface since TMZ has one of her just before the shoot (in a robe). My my, how convenient. If she doesn’t sell as well as they expect, then hold your breath because they might release the untouched ones just for publicity sake (what else is left for her?).

    • Madisyn says:

      Regarding the ‘no muscle tone’. I completely agree. Thats why the pic of her straddling the ‘bunny’ chair at the top is FAKE. A. Those legs have muscle tone. B. Blohan is NOT that ‘leggy’. She’s rather short and those legs look like someone who is 5’8 or 5’9. What is this idiot, 5’4 tops?

      I feel sorry for the poor schmuck who bangs her. When she disrobes, the shock and horror of reality is gonna smack this dude/chick senseless.

      I’d actually pay good money to see the first photoshoot that was rejected and BEFORE photoshop.

      • becky says:

        4No, she’s not. She’s taller than 5’4.

      • MorticiansDoItDeader says:

        Morning Madisyn!

        I think you mean, when she disrobes, her pendulous boobies are gonna smack this dude/chick senseless. Without photoshop those puppies look like a couple of tube socks with rocks in them!

        On another note, it appears I missed chat again 🙁 I’m usually available at night 8 or later EST next time you decide to do it

      • Oi says:

        Look at her left foot, especially where it meets the show. There are no shadows. Totally PS.

    • JaneWonderfalls says:

      I agree! For these to be supposedly re-shot and photo shopped on top of that, they are not that appealing. I know I’m a women who is straight but I can’t see how men would look at these either and be wowed!!! She needs to hire new people and career advisers because this will not revive her career.

      • GradStudentEatingHotPockets says:

        I agree. SHe’s just not attractive in these. I think they had to photoshop her body A LOT though…esh.

  5. Carobell says:

    The pictures are pretty, but photoshop (and life) make her look so plastic. She doesn’t look like a real person, or even herself, but rather computer’s interpretation of what Marilyn Monroe looks like. There is nothing in that pictorial that makes me think ‘wow, Lindsay looks good’ because nothing in that pictorial is actually her.

  6. Shelly says:

    She does have pretty boobies. The pictures are good, but why oh why oh why won’t she just embrace the sexy spitfire redhead look instead of trying to be a bleached blonde bombshell?! Blonde just does NOT work for her, no matter how much they photoshop. She may still be a cracken as a redhead, but she looks less cracken then.

    • Alexis says:

      Yeah, some people can dye their hair any color they want, but Lindsay is not one of them. Her complexion is such that her natural red is by far the best. Maybe she could do a dark brown or maaaaybe a very dark blonde. This white blond makes her skin look dirty.

      They literally photoshopped all of her skin. She doesn’t have any freckles in this. That’s why the pics look like paintings.

      Boobs look good — not sure how you could photoshop them into looking perky when they’re actually saggy, so I think posing + photoshop + they’re less saggy than we thought are all at play.

      • Mava says:

        I work with photoshop and trust me, you can do some miracle things with it. It wouldn’t be difficult at all to push her boobies up a little. They do look good though, photoshop or not!

  7. Khalesi says:

    while I may have to bleach my eyeballs afterwards, I am kind of interested in seeing the untouched photos from this shoot…

  8. tyson says:

    what is the upside for LL releasing the photos early? i don’t think it was her. her manager/mom would want this to be a best seller. to release the photos early will kill sales. wasn’t LL or her camp.

    • Madisyn says:

      I agree. I don’t think this is Lohan Inc. at work here, only because they wouldn’t have access to the pics before hand. Even if she did get an advanced copy before the release date, by her ‘leaking’ the photos, Hef would sue her little white freckled ass so fast, your head would spin. Plus, like you pointed out it wouldn’t benefit Lohan Inc. to hurt sales of the mag by releasing the pics early.

      Since we haven’t heard a peep about any lawsuits or threats of a lawsuit and since the pics remain on the internet, I’m gonna assume ole Hef has a master plan of some kind. I can’t imagine what it is, but he must.

      • WillyNilly says:

        Re: Hef’s master plan…Weird kinky video during the shoot of her doing lines off her own boobs, perhaps?

  9. horizonte says:

    i saw the pics yesterday, and i can’t get over how sad and not joyous or seductive she looks. i know she’s an adult and she consented to having them taken, but something feels just off, exploitative. it really looked like she was having a miserable time, for the first time i really pitied her.

    • pwal says:

      I felt the same way. I actually had a feeling of foreboding, that this will not end well. Not to the same degree as Anna Nicole, after her son died, but just a feeling that things are going to get worse.

      Maybe it’s because I flashed back to when she was 17 and the press was much too fixated on her breasts. And now, she’s giving the boys what they want, albeit several years later.

      It’s just sad.

      • Guest says:

        I agree. The whole thing is very sad. She has been exploited her entire life and I cannot imagine what that does to a person. Obviously she has to take responsibility for her own actions but she looks so dead and damaged in these photos. Although I will say, photoshop or not, she is quite lovely.

  10. Hautie says:

    I want to see the pictures from the first Playboy shoot that got dumped.

    And I still think Lohan looks like Amanda Lepore’s ugly sister.

  11. Selena says:

    Where has the crack that belongs to her back disappeared to in pic 7? Bad photoshop! Bad!

  12. truetalk says:

    way too much photoshopping. honestly,if we were not told nobody would know it’s lindsay lohan.those breasts definitely
    look nothing like those seen in her see-thru tops.

  13. Paul Frehley says:

    I have a theory about the leaked photos. I think Playboy “leaked” them.

    When it comes right down to it the pictures are really just average looking. There is nothing sexy about them it really looks like she doesn’t even know how to pose. And if this is the best of the photos. What did the first shoot look like?

    So back my theory, with the photos “leaked” Playboy can blame the internet when the magazine doesn’t sell well.

    Just saying.

    • The Original Mia says:

      I think they did too. Doesn’t make sense for Cracken to release them. She wants the issue to be a mega-seller. Playboy, oth, has plenty of reasons to release them. It isn’t going to be a big seller and the photos are pretty average. Her eyes are dead. Her body isn’t toned. Her boobs are gorgeous, but that’s it.

      For sexy, look at Buffy’s Charisma Carpenter’s pictorial. Hers was amazing. Very sexy. Try again, Cracken!

  14. Silk Spectre says:

    Even though she’s in her birthday suit these pics aren’t sexy, seductive or anything like that, just plain boring. I’ve seen fashion spreads in magazines that were hotter than that….and these gals were clothed.

  15. wonderwoman21 says:

    How is it she is so curvaceous, with that curve on her side? She always had a very straight midsection, boyish even. PHOTOSHOP

  16. MaiGirl says:

    I REALLY thought that these photos would be A LOT worse. She looks pretty good. Obvious ‘Shop, sure, but her boobs look fantastic. Clearly, they curved her up in the butt and legs, since she has none IRL, but I am having a serious case of boob envy. Also, totally agree with Shelly above. If she had gone back to the red, these photos would have looked a lot better. Blonde washes her out, makes her look older and more dirty and orange, and makes her look psychotic when styled Marilyn short. With that longer hair style in her natural red, she could have still done the retro, but it would have been a hell of a lot more youthful and flattering.

    • kibbles says:

      I noticed that she had big boobs around the time Mean Girls came out and she was wearing a lot of low cut dresses to premieres. Her boobs look good but they are likely breast implants.

      • ahoyhoy says:

        They ARE implants. Saline. I knew two ‘dancers’ in college who got saline implants—they look natural and they DO SAG! They looked exactly like these.
        The sag potential is why so many stars get silicone, and why everyone seems to believe LL must have real boobs.
        LL’s surgery at 17 is well-documented by many witnesses (workers at the hotel she stayed at post-op, etc).

  17. Booboocita says:

    FoxNews.com (via HuffPo) is reporting that the original leak came from a filesharing website called WorldMags.net, based in Eastern Europe, and that they’re the product of some hacker who managed to break into Playboy’s servers, download about 200 files, and reassemble them. So it may not have been Crackie or her mother who leaked them.

    Either way, they look very little like her, although they look as good as anyone could possibly make her look, I guess.

  18. GiGi says:

    I thought these were weird. A two day shoot and these are the best of the best? And they needed *that* much photoshop? This feels very “prop her up & trot her out” like Britney.

    Also – re: her boobs – They’re as saggy as mine and I’ve nursed three kids – and they’re enormous – I’m not sure why she doesn’t think she needs a bra. Ever.

    • theaPie says:

      Yeah, she needs to start giving those babies some support, or they WILL end up at her knees, implants or no.

    • the original bellaluna says:

      Word, GiGi. I wrote that on a previous thread. I’ve nursed 3 and her girls are actually saggier than mine. She’ll be able to tuck those babies into her pants in no time!

  19. The Original Denise says:

    Dipped in bleach? She needs to be dipped in flea powder and disinfectant. This will not revive her career; Hollywood has moved on an there is a whole flock of young and younger actresses who are making strides. Her time is over, now it is time for her to move on. But she will never be a force in films again, ever.

  20. whatev says:

    It’s strange to me how Lindsey is all bleached blond and extensioned when the whole fun of the MM photo shoot was a curly haired, (naturally) red headed Monroe.

    • whatevs says:

      almost username twins! marilyn wasn’t a redhead though she was born a blonde, and her hair got darker over time like most blondes’ hair.

    • Minty says:

      Marilyn was naturally blonde as a child. Google it. Her hair darkened to auburn (reddish brown) by the time she was a teenager. Her hair was already dyed blonde when she posed nude in 1949. Back then, color photo processing sometimes got the tint wrong. That’s why she looks like a true redhead in some earlier photos.

  21. Thea says:

    I think Playboy leaked the pictures also to drum up more interest. Now, there is a scandal surrounding them. Will increase sales. And if I were to give that issue as a gift to my husband for Christmas, he would probably actually read it and not look at the pics.

  22. Sophie says:

    That’s AFTER the shop job? Are u guys sure? I’m still seeing a good bit of cellulite and uneven skin tone that I would have thought they’d get rid of.

    Does anyone know whether she’s had a boob job?

    • Lenore says:

      That’s what’s confusing me about all these “her boobs look pretty good” comments – wasn’t there a controversy over Lindsay suddenly, um, blossoming overnight in her teens? I thought it was a given that those breasts were bought and paid for.

  23. Paul Frehley says:

    Everyone keeps saying how nice her boobs are. You all do realize that boobs can be fixed with Photoshop?

  24. Seal Team 6 says:

    Ugh. Lohan is NOT Christine Keeler, nor Joanne Whalley, which is what that cover is supposed to be. She is too pathetic and crackie to bring down a government.

    And, talk about PHOTOSHOPPING HELL!

  25. Seal Team 6 says:

    The iconic of Keeler, which Joanne Whalley reproduced in the movie about the Profumo Affair:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christine_Keeler

  26. Just U says:

    Amsterdam. That’s what they look like. If you’ve ever been to the red light district you’ll know what I mean. Should be sexy (blonde, red satin, nude, heels), but really a bit sad.
    I feel bad for her that this is actually her life.

  27. Javagirl1 says:

    The boobs look good, but she still seems so dirty. I have the urge to burn everything she sat on/rolled around on for the shoot.

    • Madisyn says:

      No worries Java. Hef collected everything she touched on the set, went to an empty field on his property, poured lighter fluid on everything, and struck a match. Hazmat was then called and removed the burnt out rubble.

  28. Jennifer says:

    OMG OMG OMG she looks perfect in these pictures. She is MM od this century. She is stunning. I’m so happy for her she is on right track again. I’m sure 2012 will be her year – huge comeback on the way. After all these time haters finally have no reasons to hate her. She is just doing great.

  29. Marianne says:

    I can’t believe some of you had the curiosity to look at nudes pics of Linds…blech

    • MorticiansDoItDeader says:

      It’s like a car wreck. You know you shouldn’t look, but your curiosity gets the best of you.

      • Jo 'Mama' Besser says:

        No, it doesn’t.

        But I guess it’s just safer to head to the bomb shelter whenever any kind of eclipse occurs if you’re a ‘curiosity killed the coke’ type.

      • MorticiansDoItDeader says:

        @jo mama, I think I’m a bit of a masochist actually 😉

  30. mary simon says:

    she’s skinny but flabby – there is potential there if she would go to the gym. she does need a boob lift. most of the pictures had her lifting her arms up and back, straining herself in an effort to pull her boobs away from her waist. Unfortunately, nothing can be done about the face at this point.

  31. Sim says:

    Don’t have boob envy, photoshop is AMAZING! They can put em up under your chin if they want to, turn obese people into skinny minis you wouldn’t believe what that program can do.

  32. Madisyn says:

    Those tatas were ‘lifted’ by photoshop. This twit NEVER wears a bra so we know how low they hang, we’ve seem them on display every time she steps foot out the door.

    They do look GREAT, thats how you know they’re NOt hers.

    • Jo 'Mama' Besser says:

      I haven’t looked at these photos, but if memory serves, her gruesome twosome could shovel the sidewalk pre-blizzard. How can it be comfortable to walk around without one all the time? Even with full scaffolding and butresses, you won’t find me running down the stairs to catch that subway.

      If she’s doing anything less than spontaneously (and fruitlessly) attempting to re-furl her vulva once she drops trou in these shots, the people are lying to you.

      • MorticiansDoItDeader says:

        @Jo mama, that’s just wrong! LOL. I think I need a lobotomy after the mental image you painted.

  33. Jackie says:

    i know they are Photoshopped, but her body looks great. i would really enjoy having that rack.

  34. Kat says:

    I find it interesting and a little weird that they photoshopped her tattoos off. At least the one on her lower back is mysteriously gone.

  35. Sasha says:

    ‘She’ looks great – but I don’t see any point in commenting on any of it because even slight tweaking with photoshop can completely change a face/body.

    The boobs are fantastic, sure, but they’re NOT HER BOOBS.

    As for the MM tribute.. the camera loved MM. She brought something more than beauty. The sexiness came from her playfulness. Even if she faked it there was always play and joy in her eyes. LL’s eyes are kind of dead.

  36. mollie says:

    I also agree that playboy leaked these because they knew it would not sell well. They opted to get the most publicity possible for the magazine. This girl NEEDS to go back to redhead. She is so pathetic as a blond. It simply does NOT work and is not sexy. Her bony butt makes me sad, and her feet are NOT the sexy barefoot kind of feet. I find myself looking for orange spray tan streaks. Lindsay please, change your hair, put some clothes on and go low profile for a while.

  37. MissyA says:

    THAT’S the reshoot? Really? THAT?

    I mean, with all the media hoopla over Playboy wanting to take “a new direction” a few days after wrapping the original shoot, I was kinda expecting something. . . more.

    It’s not terrible, just. . . typical, subdued, run-of-the mill, mundane Playboy shit. (My FIL has a lifetime subscription, and has a portfolio of every centerfold from the early 1960’s through today. Unfortunately, I know of what I speak.) I mean, how could she f up the original shoot so badly when the reshoot is just so . . . average?

    Seriously want to see the originals if this is all they could come up with for the reshoot. It’s got to look like the Tuesday shift at the strip club by the airport. . .

  38. TG says:

    There was so much photo shopping I wonder if any of it is real. Usually they photo shop you to look thinner but in this case it is obvious they put in curves on her and gave her more meat on her bones so they could have that soft look. She is a stick insect that like Kaiser said looks dipped in flea dip and hung out to dry. Gross.

    • Carolyn says:

      It’s screamingly obvious the body isn’t Lindsay. The next PR line will be that Playboy has gone for a Varga-girl type of shoot…trying to recreate the glamour of 50’s pinup girls…3..2..1. People don’t really buy this mag anymore do they?

  39. MissyA says:

    Also, I’m fairly sure that’s her “actual” body, but her face looks like it was cut and pasted on in mircosoft word. Which makes everything about this shoot suspect. . .

    • Agnes says:

      it does, doesn’t it? her head looks superimposed on the body (her body filtered through photoshop? someone else’s? – it doesn’t matter, they should have made it look less awkward.)

  40. ManicPixieDreamGirl says:

    I think her body looks smokin’ hot, but couldn’t they have photoshopped some life into her eyes? Yikes.

  41. Madisyn says:

    In that top pic of her straddling the bunny chair, you know she’s just ITCHING, DYING to stick those dirty, filthy fingers in her mouth, like she always does.

    • MorticiansDoItDeader says:

      I’m sure she does A LOT of itching.

      BTW, I responded to one of your comments above re:chat.

  42. marie says:

    People WANT to see Lindsey Lohan naked??? WHY???? She is skungy…looks old and worn out and smelly.

  43. Victoria says:

    What is the point of even shooting someone if you’re just going to photoshop them to death anyway. Seriously. Even the most undeserving celebrities get it.

  44. la chica says:

    the aureolas around the nipples are inconsistent. one minute she has them, next minute she doesn’t. cheap work Hef.

  45. Jenn12 says:

    Looked at the 1st few, lost interest. It’s a total pity that she possessed such a cute face, great body and so much talent and just flushes it all down the crack toilet daily. Her youth is holding the line against the abuses, but that won’t last much longer. What a waste. My 7 year old loves to watch “Parent Trap” and says, “Those are great actresses! Where are they?” I don’t have the heart to tell her: facedown in a pile of coke, twitching.

    • Lenore says:

      Ha! Classic! 🙂

      Just tell her that the young lady no longer acts, but went on to do good work in the sciences and humanities, and that’s why that pretty red-haired girl isn’t on TV much anymore. Sure, one day she’ll find out it isn’t true, just like she’ll find out about Santa and the Tooth Fairy, but until then, let her have her illusions.

    • Jo 'Mama' Besser says:

      Oh, I’d definitely tell her. It’d be just the bracing tonic she would need to instantly keep her mind on her business: now, and in perpetuity. I’m thinking of mounting a teaching through trauma symposium at whatever recreation centre is closest to me and I think it’s a pretty genius move. After my guidance, what you’ll be hearing from the children is, ‘Pole, what’s a pole? Does that have anything to do with my current successful career as an air traffic controller?’ You’re welcome.

  46. Leigh says:

    haven’t we already seen most of these parts when she’s getting in and out of cars?… or drunk and stumbling around LA?

  47. hazeldazel says:

    LOL, they ‘shopped her thighs together in one pic! epic! yeah, what a horror show – she had dead eyes, and almost every pic had her arms above her head to hide how saggy her boobs were. notice how saggy the skin of her upper arms were? and this is the 2nd shoot and after the photoshop was done? yikes, i’m glad we’re not seeing the raw pics! *shudders*

  48. sabine says:

    Nothing works here. The blonde hair is awful, her lips fake and ugly, freckles everywhere, doughy body…who actually thinks this girl is attractive

  49. dahlia1947 says:

    Ok you all put her down, but it didn’t stop u from looking at the pics did it? She wins again! BTW, I love that pink jacket!

  50. skeptical says:

    it’s the case of the disappearing and reappearing areolas/areolae!
    (lol at my spellchecker saying i mean aureole)
    And her legs seem conjoined in one of those pics.
    And I doubt that’s her real butt. I remember some pap pics of her caught on some photo shoot, she was in a gray swimsuit and her butt was flabby-flat.
    It looks as though it was photographed upside down then rotated and shopped on a pic of her upright.
    She does not have a waist. nor hips. That is also shooped. she has a ruler-straight body, which is why I first suspected implants. She doesn’t have the curves that tend to come with real knockers.
    When she suddenly “grew” boobs, the ONLY things that “grew” were the boobs.
    http://img2.timeinc.net/people/i/2006/gallery/bodies/lindsay_lohan.jpg

  51. eternalcanadian says:

    And that is why women will never be taken seriously in this world when there’s ditzes like Lindsay naked in skanky rags like Playboy.

    • Jo 'Mama' Besser says:

      I’d like to live in a world where on the streets a response like that wouldn’t result in a hordes of detractors shouting ‘hater’, ‘jealous (which always seems to be spelt ‘jelouse’)’, or spark a, hm, *thoughtful and measured* assessment of the original commenter’s weight and/or personal attractiveness. I’m going to use my intelligence to assume that unless you post a photo of yourself you are a gorgon and probably can’t keep a man and since you may not be as affluent as the celebrity in question, you can’t be permitted to rent your own opinions.

    • Marc says:

      May I point out to you Canadian, that half the females that appear in Playboy seem to be Canadian. As for all of these starlets who provide the T&A in grade-Z horror flicks, they all seem to be Canadian. So spare us the Feminist observation. By todays standards, Playboy is classy! What was skanky a generation ago is mainstream today.

  52. Meanchick says:

    What’s with the blow-up doll expression on her face? Just nasty.

  53. ... says:

    I’ll be honest, I have had the Lohan special treatment with photoshop before. Back in my professional dancer days I was paid to appear in a whopping three magazines and several editorial photos. During one shoot I had been lazy and had no muscle tone to my ass. They can work miracles. And for the record we know her knockers are saggy and gross with large areolas; so a common trick to make them appear higher is posing (arms up/angles) and putting skin coloured foundation on the bottom of the areola or around the entire thing to make the nipple-to-boob ratio more appealing. That being said, she looks surprising good….for the fact that David Copperfield is probably distracting us as a whole so he can make the “whore” on her disappear. Like an elephant.

  54. Kloops says:

    Kinda disappointed. They’re dull. Not particularly crackalackin nor are they particularly pretty and definitely not sexy. It’s weird, parts of her look clearly photoshopped but there’s still some uneven skin tone. Meh. Anti-climactic. I was expecting them to be horrifying or nominees for photoshop of the year. Enough with the Marilyn comparisons. It’s so over done ams not even remotely relevant to this person.

    • Lenore says:

      Agreed – they’re just dull. Mostly she looks dead-eyed, but charitably, one could put that down to the strain involved in trying to literally recreate someone else’s poses. She’s not thinking sexy thoughts, she’s thinking, “Where should my elbow be?” and “Is my back arched too far for this shot?” and “Mom, where’s my Vodka Red Bull?”

      Charitably.

      I just Googled the original Marilyn Monroe shoot with Tom Kelley and they are beautiful. So innocent and playful they barely even register as sexual anymore – she’s just adorable.

  55. MoMo says:

    The pics are so photo shopped they look like animation movie stills.

  56. Princess Charming says:

    “I have no idea why there is this fascination with everything I do.”
    Um…it’s not fascination…it’s pity, disgust, thankful-that-I’m-not-you-ness, it’s like watching the most awful film that you can’t look away from because you are amazed at the awfulness.
    I think all attention of Lindsey should cease and desist. The girl has ruined herself. I can’t even fathom how she thinks anything about her is desirable. No, I didn’t look at her nekkid pictures, I’m not that hard up. All I need to see are the above pictures with those hideous fish lips, vacant eyes, and busted look to know that I need not see any more. It seems with her, bad attention is better than no attention, and that’s indicative of serious, serious issues. She’s beyond help, and her mother should be locked up for creating this mess of a woman.

  57. Hugh Mungus says:

    A failing magazine is paying a million dollars for this piece of trash?

  58. wunder says:

    She just isnt Playboy material. . . ugh! (Those legs-sticks???)

    Photoshopped to the HILT! Her face looks unrecognizable. That said, she looks better than usual.

  59. DrM says:

    @ The Cracken photos look like she’s been dipped in bleach and flea dip and then Photoshopped within an inch of her life…

    Priceless…. LOL

  60. ZenB!tch says:

    Review: I’m not horrified so she looks great. I’m not horrified so it’s not interesting. I WANTED TO BE HORRIFIED! I may need a Hourtney Love fix after this.

    Seriously, all I could think is “OMG! Her skin looks so dry.” And, yes, lovely boobs. I had those once around 19-20. When they are that big they go early, she had a little ‘shop help with them but I do think they are hers vs. fake. They just have a digital lift here.

  61. hi says:

    her body does not look toned. this shoot is a real come down in playboy standards. unfortunately, lindsay has reached the age where she must workout to look good naked

  62. Quinn says:

    Her face looks soooo old in these pics…

  63. Hanna says:

    Ugh. They got to the point of photoshopping her nipples. This girl… She’s pure trash, a dumbstershopped crackhead. And her face… That crack is getting the best of her.

  64. Mitch Buchanan Rocks says:

    Whoever photoshopped this playboy cover did an excellent job of making Lindsay look like the lovely Monica Potter.

  65. Filthycute says:

    She looks computer generated. Jessica Rabbit, anyone?

  66. Boo says:

    Did we all see that TMZ is reporting she left her $5000 purse in the car while she was inside a house partying (but not drinking! oh nooooooo), and it was stolen, along with the probation paperwork saying she was allowed to travel, her passport, a TON of cash, and any number of other items? I wonder if this little incident will prevent our Darling Crackie from attending her court date on Wednesday? I’m just surprised the “theft” didn’t happen closer to her court date.

    • Madisyn says:

      Only this twit would take her passport inside the U.S. We know she has a drivers license because she was pap’d at McDonalds behind the wheel, what a couple of days ago. Two weeks ago, I flew to Vegas and all I had to do was show my DL. Blohan need only do the same.

      Amazing, how quickly WO got on the horn to TMZ to let them know all about it. Blohan must not be sharing ENOUGH of that PB money with ‘mommy’.

      I smell bullshit on this ‘theft’. This is just WO looking to make a quick buck, as usual.

  67. Lady D says:

    Am I the only one that thinks Crackie sold those pictures? This trick is a thief and she would have no problem getting paid for posing and turning around and selling the pictures on the sly to make more money. Lohan Inc is responsible for the leak, I’d bet money on it.
    OT, someone stole her purse this morning in Hawaii. Couldn’t happen to a nicer person!

    • Boo says:

      You are not the only one. I hope Hef’s team of lawyers and investigators are looking into it and they sue her ass for a bazillion dollars and have her arrested for theft or fraud or some such. I am always hoping for the worst for that little grifter and her whole clan of thieves…but she always gets away with everything, so…no breath-holding here.

  68. Newtsgal says:

    OMG!
    The cracken says her purse got stolen in Hawaii. Along with “thousands of dollars” she said that her passport was stolen too!
    First- why take your passport to Hawaii?
    Wonder if she is trying to get out of court again…..LOL!

    • Lady D says:

      I was wondering about the passport thing too. Is it a law in the US that you have to carry a passport for cross-state travel? I though you only needed one to cross international borders. I need one to get in and out of the states but I can go anywhere in Canada without it.

      • dovesgate says:

        No, a passport is not needed for cross-state travel. She won’t have any problems flying from Hawaii to LAX unless she uses her passport as her identification to get on flights and doesn’t take her driver license.

        Except she will probably try to make some excuse to not show up in court by saying she has to stay in Hawaii to straighten everything out or that she has no way to get back home because her only photo id was stolen.

  69. Stephanie says:

    IMO, the last time Lindsay was sexy was when she danced to Jingle Bell Rock in Mean Girls. I wish she would stop being something she’s not. What a sad way to live. She probably doesn’t even know who she is any more.

  70. Karen says:

    OMG, there are morons on the other site explaining that you have to have a passport to go to Hawaii (which is a state and thus no passport required for the non-Americans who might not know)because you “go across international waters”! Always defending the Cracken. Can’t wait to see pictures from her phone!!!!

  71. Rachel says:

    Her eyes are dead… you can just tell she’d rather be off snorting coke in the bathroom rather than posing for the cameras. The least sexy nude shoot I’ve ever seen, seriously.

  72. anonymoose says:

    “I have no idea why there is this fascination with everything I do.”

    there isn’t.

    and though i have not been paying attention and have never once seen any of LL’s movies, i looked at these photos and conclude that both playboy and LL are trying either way too hard – or not nearly hard enough – to be fascinating.

    are we sure Lohan didn’t pay playboy for this spread? because no one’s heart seems in it, they’ve only succeeded in making tart water out of lemons (ie, not even close to achieving proverbial lemonade.)

  73. Jay says:

    People are missing the obvious on who leaked the photos: it was Adobe. They want everyone to see what Photoshop can do.

  74. Madisyn says:

    Afternoon Mort, Boo, Lady D

    All great comments, per usual. Mort, how about we meet in ‘chat’, say at 5pm PST, 8 your time? Let me know. All are welcome.

    I really don’t have too much to say on this subject as I think everyone pretty much covered it.

  75. hillbilly in the corner says:

    The TMZ story is a deversion from this Playboy story

    Cause she has been takien a bashing on this one and they want to draw attention away from the spectualtion as to who leaked what…..
    I find it a little too convinent that she skips town the same day this pics hits the net and to answer your question she would have gotten a coutersy copy of the magazine ahead of the release date . I get copies of any of my books a month sometimes before they hit the stores…so Lohan Inc had time to do this and
    Why do it cause once she had her hands on the payment for the pics then all bet and contracts are off in Lindsayland and she would sale them in a minute and did….She had no scuples and no no honor…
    So much for changing and turning over a new leaf and sorry folks but don’t you think she’s about used up every “chance and excuse for her action ” that any one person should get…She like the writer of this article said is a Crack Monster !!!
    NO MORE EXCUSES !!

  76. hillbilly in the corner says:

    Bye the way
    the girl who said that wasn’t Lindsay body on the cover is right notice the boobies …they ain’t even close to Lindsay much smaller and don’t sag low enough…the face has been superimposed over the model and is not quite the same size as the rest of the fiqure thats why your eyes keep tell you somethings wrong and you can’t quit figure it out…LOL

  77. Sillyone says:

    I CAN NOT be the only one who thinks she looks like a terrible cheap looking transvestite…(No offense to any transvestite out there)

  78. Devon says:

    These are gross. even my hubby thinks so.

  79. skeptical says:

    i love the pic Michael K posted of Marilyn herself doing the “is this b*tch serous” look. he credits someone on ONTD. I just love the pic. Poor Marilyn, whatever you think of Marilyn, she still doesn’t deserve to constantly have her name attached to this skank!

  80. Jason Bond says:

    Look I think she might have leaked her own shoot.

  81. Marie says:

    I’m not a Lindsay fan at all, she has made horrible choices and has brought this on herself. However, to sit here and make fun of her and judge her is not funny. These pictures really tell of what is to come for her, nothing. She will most likely not make it to 30 and people just point and laugh.

  82. TXCinderella says:

    That doesn’t even look like her. They must have done alot of airbrushing.

  83. Maria says:

    pathetic and ugly girl,poor marilyn 🙁

  84. GT says:

    I think she looks gorgeous! She has a smokin body and we all know that every model in that magazine gets photoshopped to some extent and maybe some more than others.

  85. kimberly says:

    Saw the pics because I was bored, they are nothing interesting or special pretty blah.I guess if i was like 14 I’d think it was cool, but I’ve seen hotter chicks working a pole than LL in those pics.

  86. Lauren says:

    Doesn’t everyone get Photoshopped? I recall that WV said LL breasts were real. I am older than Lindsay, have two children, somehow I still have nice breasts. Thank God. I get asked if my boobs are real. Yes indeed..would never get saline/silicone sacks sewn into my chest. I just want Lindsay to get well. She was brilliant in Mean Girls..Woman seem to HATE other women that are naturally endowed. LL is an addict, and criticizing her is nasty, and counterproductive.

  87. Loongfellow says:

    Did any of you guys ever think that maybe Hef could be holding out? Two things that are a consistant given with Playboy: plastic models & great photography. Hard for me to believe that Hef would ever allow a shoot this bad to actually hit the stands. Hmmmm…a completely different layout in the printed mag?! Gotta buy it!!

  88. M_In_O_Town says:

    She doesn’t deservce to be put in the same league as Marilyn Monroe. How much did they airbrush her rotten teeth??? Homeless people will soon be dogging her.

  89. Ron says:

    What an awful set of photos. I can’t imagine a less attractive set of images. I have to wonder if Playboy caught the true essence of Lindsay — I mean, is this it? Is she so far gone that this is the best photos they could get?