Brad Pitt: “Angelina Jolie is still a bad girl… delightfully so”

Back in November, Angelina Jolie did an interview with 60 Minutes in which she claimed that she “is still a bad girl… I still have that side of me. . . it’s just in its place now. . . it belongs to Brad–or our adventures.” She gave us hope, y’all. All of us Angeloonies, we wish and hope and dream that some day, we’ll see our old Angelina, the wild maneater who could just as easily stab you as f–k you. I like the current Angelina – I do! – but sometimes I get a little sick of her all-mommy-all-the-time stuff. I miss the old Angelina!

Anyway, Brad Pitt was interviewed on CBS’s This Morning with Charlie Rose. Charlie showed Brad the clip of Angelina talking about the “bad girl” stuff, and Brad’s reaction was just… delicious. Brad says: “She’s still a bad girl. Delightfully so. It’s not for public consumption.” It’s around the 4:30 mark on this video:

Um, did that make anyone else hot? The way Brad smiles and says, “Yeeeeah, she’s still a bad girl.” Like he’s whispering it in her ear as he’s on top of her? Or would he say that to her while she’s on top and his arms are tied to the bedpost? Damn, that was hot.

And, sure, Brad also talks about the kids, Moneyball, politics and using Paul Newman as an example of the kind of life he (Brad) wants. It’s a good interview, and you can read some additional quotes here. But I will be all over Brad’s Oscar campaign if he gives more interviews like this. Please, Brad! Talk dirty to us.

Photos courtesy of WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

172 Responses to “Brad Pitt: “Angelina Jolie is still a bad girl… delightfully so””

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. originalone says:

    Never thought I’d say this: But I am overdosing on the Brange here. Need rehab, a full month of no Brange.

    It has gotten a bit too much nauseating with all the TMIs. a Tad.

    • MorticiansDoItDeader says:

      I’m with you on that one.

      • originalone says:

        Not to rile the Brangeloonies, but this TMI with Brad is getting pretty close to Kim K! territory. No cameras need follow him around, he is talking my ears off with his everyday life in details.

        Thought the Brange Brand was built on “keep them guessing, they’ll keep on coming for more”?

      • Pop Rocks says:

        @Originalone. They’ve been like the Kardashians for YEARS. Go back and look at all the family life stuff from Benjamin Button and all the other films. It’s ALWAYS TMI. I’m glad people are finally noticing.

      • originalone says:

        Now see, I’m pervy @Pop Rock. I wouldn’t mind getting some information. Wouldn’t mind having them confirm when they really hooked-up and if the NY Post and Enquirer stories were true.

        But this, this is too much in too little time. It should have been dispersed over a 12-month period. Wouldn’t have lost credibility in the process.

      • Bohemia says:

        WELL, SINCE HE WAS ASKED, I DIDN’T EXPECT HIM TO SAY ANYTHING LESS! keep talking, Brad… Grrrrr! HAWT!

    • Asli says:

      LOL! Originalone – I recently emerged from a Brangeloonie-induced coma. It was not a pretty sight. Apparently I was convulsing and having seizures every time some even mentioned their names. I’m all good now, though 😀

      • originalone says:

        LOL! Glad you’re doing better. I’m starting to get into hypoglycemic shock myself.

      • Asli says:

        HAHAHHAHAH – Yeah, I think we need a shot of Daniel Day-Lewis to balance this out. Hmmm. Maybe an IV-drip. It’s going to be tough for him. Will he be able to override the Brangeloonie? We’ll see…

  2. Sasha says:

    I haven’t OD’d on Brange yet. Give me more! I love their love 🙂

    • Ida says:

      Good, ’cause they’re selling it.

    • teri says:

      I love it also, never to much. 🙂

    • Freya says:

      I have been away on vacation, then my PC and laptop BOTH broke down, plus other things to do… I haven’t seen or read too much about my favorite Hollywood family. I’m back to reading about them now and I like it.

      It will be quiet again for a while, after the Oscars. Of course I’m hoping Brad wins, but I think the French guy will most probably take the tropy home.

  3. spinner says:

    I am burnt out on Brad & Angie as well. Yes, yes…Angie is still a bad ass.

    Enough.

  4. carrie says:

    subliminal message: “i’m nice,i have a great family,i’m a nice actor: GIVE ME AN OSCAR!the french guy doesn’t speak english! Clooney yet has an Oscar!”

  5. 221jazz says:

    OK..I get it! she is a freak in the bedroom…she spanks your monkey, she tickles your no no place, she makes your toes curl like the witch in The Wizard Of Oz blah blah blah. Please!! Academy give him the Oscar already so he’ll shut the f**k up.

  6. Tiffany27 says:

    Dear Brad,
    I know you want an Oscar, but ffs please sit DOWN already. You are making me hate you and I don’t like it.

  7. venny says:

    I never understood Brad’s appeal (or Angelina’s, for that matter), but I suppose it’s nice to hear that they’re doing good things and have given a home to children who otherwise likely wouldn’t have anything.

    Also, ‘producorial’…? 😉

  8. sarah says:

    LOVE LOVE LOVE it. OMG, yeah that one little bit MELTED me. Damn the things I’d do to her.

  9. Astrid says:

    Brad’s still got it.

  10. shontay says:

    I love them. I don’t even care. I love Brad’s Oscar campaign, too. This is what he’s supposed to do. Sell, sell, sell. He’s also a producer on this thing and so he should do all he can to keep the movie out there. That’s the game.

  11. Shoes says:

    I burnt out on the Brange weeks ago. This heavy, heavy Oscar push, combined with the heavy ITLOBH push, has been a bit much.

    ETA: I don’t have any problems with them or anyone talking about being happy and in love, generally. It’s the quantity of it all that did it. Awards season always does this.

  12. Kimbob says:

    All of this oversharing is riduculous. Like above bloggers, yes, Angeliena is beautiful, bad, blah, blah, & blah! OK..enough already!

    I’ll apologize in advance…Brad could be hotter looking. I think he’s cleaned up his looks for his “Oscar campaign,” but really he’s reminding me more of an OLD GOAT anymore. He literally looks like a damn goat to me…there…I said it!

    Honest truth…I just smell desperation here. Brad is just “going w/it” & agreeing to sully himself, & where it’ll end, I don’t know…but I for one, am just OVER IT.

  13. lisa says:

    I loved it.. loved the look on his face when they showed that clip. His smile. NICE..and so what if he wants an Oscar. Lots of actors do. He had an amazing year.

    but yeah..I much prefer the behind close doors Angie. I like that they obviously still get hot for each other. I think that’s nice.. especially after 6 children.. Can’t be easy.

    • deltona lakes says:

      Yea, but the difference is Angie had his babies. Goes much further when a man has that smile after 7 years and 6 kids.

    • deltona lakes says:

      But Brad and Angie are still together. So, make the comparisions if they break-up.
      Is it so difficult to believe that they love each other and their children? and that they could have a lasting relationship/or marriage just like Paul Newman and Joanne Woodward.

      I’m rooting for them.

  14. Ari says:

    Gimmee more!

  15. marie says:

    Well, it is nice to see a couple who loves one another and is not divorcing. I think they will go the distance in their marriage and I hope so for the kids. So many couples have divorced lately.

  16. Pop Rocks says:

    There’s a great article in New York magazine this week about the Fame Economy and there is a blurb on Brandgelina which basically says their relationship is where their real money comes from. I guess this is why we have to hear about their sex lives all the time and every intricate detail of their relationship and their children.

    I’m so burnt out on them. They’re worse than the Kardashians when it comes to the personal life exploitation. They just don’t technically have a TV show about it.

    Also, Brad appeared on a New York radio show this week and basically admitted that they stage all the photos of the kids because they want to control the images. He made it sound like this was a great thing and that he was pulling one over on the press. The fact that they use their children to manipulate their public personas seems to have escaped him. And his fans.

    • Kara Ann says:

      I agree with you completely and thanks for the heads up on the New York magazine piece. Hope it’s available online.
      BTW, the logic of I say “when”, “who”, and “how” per the family photos doesn’t wash for me. Reminds me of the line in Pretty Woman where the hooker is boasting about all of the control she has in her line of work. The comparison with the Jolie/Pitts may be apt when it comes to making money off family.

    • Jin says:

      What bugs me about Brad and Angelina is they hide behind this self-righteous “we’re exploiting our image and our children for charity” when they make enough money to give to charity. Johnny Depp is a huge star and I’ve never seen him stage photo ops with his kids. They don’t have to do that. They feed the press machine.

    • Rhea says:

      Maybe he meant that they prefer to choose when the press can take pictures of their kids. I am not a Pitt’s fan but I am trying to understand him. Public still wants them so the picture of their kids still selling. Better give some than getting hunt down. Might as well staged it. If there’s no sight of them people always assuming the worst like the kids are down syndromes or ill or they must be a bad parents for never taking the kids out.

      Perhaps that’s why they let out some of the pictures just enough to satisfied public’s curiosity. They never bring their kids to the interview or bringing camera inside their house showing what the kids do. I noticed they have a tendency to give out almost the same answer for years so isn’t that counting that they protecting their privacy too by just giving a bit and mostly the same information about them?

      • dede says:

        you are so right..a few years ago life and style or intouch had a cover that said “where’s shiloh”..another mag i think OK was counting down the last time the twins were sighted..and to IDA are you really comparing the Jolie-Pitt kids to the Depps..Angie and Brad are AList megastars..Depp is as well but Vanessa is NOT..most ppl werent itching to see their first child nor are people that interested in their family..if they were interested the media would be making a big deal out of the fact that Johhnys little girl dresses inappropriately for her age http://jjb.yuku.com/topic/699428/Lily-Rose-Depp—Tube—Mom-Vanessa-Paradis–Hollywood-Jan-6?page=1

      • Blood&Sand says:

        Big round of applause for Rhea as she/he demonstrates thoughts that are free from bias, dishonesty, and is a fair judge.

      • Rhea says:

        @PopRocks: They might try that if there’s a possibility for the law to be passed on. Even marriage for gay/lesbian still not approved in all of the state when there are so many gay/lesbian people. What makes you think the people would feel the urgent to passed on the law that ban the media to put pictures of a celebrity’s child when there are so many other pressing issue in America?

        And let’s be honest. People are mostly interested in the Jolie-Pitt’s children than any other celebrity’s child. So if they tried to pass the law people might said to them to just suck it up and moved to France where they have the law for that 😀

      • Ida says:

        @dede, you need to read properly before you reply. I didn’t make the comparison, I responded to someone who did.

    • deltona lakes says:

      PPl are interested in Brad and Angie because there’s been no other in couple since Liz Taylor and Richard Burton that match in Beauty, talent, finanial status and add their multi-racial family. They appeal to everyone.

      The fact that this couple after 7 years together and really considered midddle-age are still making covers on magazines
      Shows that they still generated $$.

      How many tab covers last week?

      Johnny/Vanessa, Gwen/Gavin, David/Victoria (I don’t think the US press ever cared), Demi/Ashton, Tom/Katie, Nicole/Keith.. No one cares about those couplings.
      I don’t see anyone in HW detroning the JP’s as least in the near future.

      Besides the exerpts that I’ve read from the NY Magazine article they really didn’t do a great job researching how the JP’s make their money. They claimed most of their income comes from endorsements and baby photos. Brad hasn’t had a endorsement deal since 2009. Angie LV $10 mil endorsement went to chariry. The baby photos of Shiloh and the twins went to charity which the magazine used as part of their income.

      Even if it didn’t go to charity, the $20 million they received 3 and 5 years ago for the baby photos is not paying for the $100 mil in properties they claim the JP’s own.

      • Ida says:

        Jolie-Pitt do not even compare to Taylor-Burton. Taylor-Burton were much more talented actors and much more glamorous and nuanced characters than these two.

      • Rhea says:

        @Ida : You do realize that Taylor also has reputation for stealing a man from his family and even her best friend? So much for character. On the side note, I think deltona lakes meant that people are interested at Jolie-Pitt for the same reason they got fascinated for Burton-Taylor. The scandal, the facts that both are nominated as the sexiest people, etc, and many other reason. You may think the Jolie-Pitt are not all that, but apparently a lot of people think they do.

      • Rhea says:

        @Ida : Also at Taylor’s time there’s no internet blogger, online website and the press are not as crazy as right now. Otherwise, they would also splashed the media A LOT and there would also made up stories spread around easily that some people would swallowed it just like that. I understand that you think the Jolie-Pitt are annoying but we should get all the facts and situation on the line first, don’t you think?

      • Ida says:

        Okay Rhea, let me make this easy for you. This: “there’s been no other in couple since Liz Taylor and Richard Burton that match in Beauty, talent, finanial status and add their multi-racial family” is specifically what I responded to. The keywords being TALENT and BEAUTY although I did admittedly interpret the word ‘beauty’ rather liberally. It, my comment, has got nothing to do with Taylor ‘stealing’ someone else’s husband…as if husbands were bloody handbags…or the internet etc. etc. In any case, gossip and scandal were not invented in the age of the internet.

      • Ida says:

        Also, the reason why I find Jolie-Pitt annoying has got nothing to do with the way they got together or Pitt’s ex. In fact, I find all three of them equally annoying.

      • Rhea says:

        @Ida : I am replying regarding your comment that Taylor-Burton were much more glamorous and nuanced characters than Jolie-Pitt. The key words is the “characters” since I do not think that Taylor is all that goody-goody in her characters too just like Jolie. As for glamorous, Taylor and Burton were glamorous at their era. Time has changing. Like I said, apparently a lot consider that the Jolie-Pitt are the next after Taylor-Burton. That’s definitely not just up to me to decide 🙂

        Why am I bringing the internet stuff and the press attitude now? Because I would like to point out that we all got annoyed with the Holy Triangle for the reason that they have become too much on our face that we got bored. Every day, every week, every time you turn on the media you will found those three for even small detail of their life. If the internet and the media are the same like now in Burton-Taylor era, you would sick to death with them too 😉

      • Ida says:

        You’re doing it again Rhea! When I say complex and nuanced characters I don’t mean goody-goody at all. And, yes, I agree, la Jolie is by no means a goody-goody, and I’m not talking about her sex life with Pitt.

        Yes, the Jolie-Pitts are overexposed but there is a difference (in theory at least) between being overexposed and actively promoting (and selling) your life or, rather, a cheesy, completely two-dimensional picture of what a modern American family is supposed to look like.

      • Ida says:

        One more thing, I’m no fan of Taylor-Burton but gotta pay credit where it’s due: they were great actors.

      • Rhea says:

        Ida : You’re doing it again too, sweetie. I am not even discussing them as an actor if you read my comments carefully. As I was saying from the beginning, Burton-Taylor were the glory of their era. Jolie-Pitt according to media–NOT ME–are the next one after them IN THIS ERA. That’s what deltona lakes meant. I have to apologized though for mistaken your comment since the way you said “Burton-Taylor much more glamorous and nuanced characters than Jolie-Pitt” sounded like they are far better as a person when in fact they were not squeaky clean either.

        Maybe you should explain why you think they are better than the other couple. I don’t see why Taylor characters are better than Jolie whatever complex you meant. They both do what they want, take what they want. Both do charities. If you say that Taylor not promoting as much as Jolie you should put a consideration about media in that era and media in this era. Also like it or not, real stories or not, internet can make you perform an opinion of someone you have never even met. If the media right now is the same like the media at Burton-Taylor era, you would not heard much about Jolie-Pitt unless the movie studio arranged it.

        And I strongly believe that internet and media that so easily to access today required a different method to handle. Do you think if Burton-Taylor are in this era they would not do the same thing? When there are so many lies spread, so many fakes sources, so many people trying to discredit you, won’t you try to come out and give your own interview to straighten up? When they are hunting you down, since your family pictures still selling–won’t you staged a photos too so public can stop bother you for a while?

        Well, that’s my 2 cents 😉 Off to make dinner now….

      • Ida says:

        Based on what I’ve observed in other threads, deltona lake really means it when she says that Jolie-Pitt are the only comparable couple to Taylor-Burton in terms of beauty, talent, sex appeal, etc. As in, although that may be the general opinion, it is also one that she shares. Which is fair enough, just not one I happen to agree with.
        Also, at the risk of repeating myself, again, you are doing it, again, petal. If I say that I ‘prefer’ Taylor-Burton to Jolie-Pitt (although that is not the case, I simply find them more interesting) because I find them to be superior actors and more nuanced characters, I couldn’t possibly explain that in terms of the fact that they all do/did what they want/wanted and give/gave money to charity. That wouldn’t constitute a very nuanced reading. But while we’re at it, the fact that they (Taylor-Burton) were bloody good at what they did certainly adds to their allure, a lot actually, as is only right. After all, what the hell does anyone of us *really* know about the life of the Jolie-Pitts? Nothing, is the answer. We go by the image they have constructed and put out there and their work as actors and I happen to find both very flat and two-dimensional and cheesy. When I see a great performer like Burton, on the other hand, I am quite moved, and Taylor, when at her best, was absolutely enthralling. Jolie meanwhile, apart from the fact that she’s a mediocre actress, although she did show some promise early in her career, can’t stop making disparaging comments about her profession, which I find unforgivable. For example, the nonsense she spouted around the time of her directorial debut. At one point she said she was relieved to be behind the camera because it meant that she didn’t have to concern herself with her appearance. As if acting involves exclusively looking good. As if looking good was a burden to her. As if she’s free from vanity. She’s a Hollywood star and you can’t be a Hollywood star and not be vain. Please. It’s a damn cheap trick and her comment an offense to the profession and people who have worked with her in the past.

      • Rhea says:

        @Ida : You see, Ida. Your understanding and my understanding are different regarding deltona lakes comments. I have to admit I am not checking other threads, don’t have that much time, so I simply took in from her previous post here. My understanding when she said –“PPl are interested in Brad and Angie because there’s been no other in couple since Liz Taylor and Richard Burton that match in Beauty, talent, finanial status and add their multi-racial family. They appeal to everyone.”—is that she meant in this era, people interested with them since Brad and Jolie match EACH OTHER in talent and beauty and financial status(plus their rainbow family).Just like when the era of Burton-Taylor where people got interested with them because they seem matched with each other in the talent, status, etc.

        As for Jolie nonsense that you said, again I interpreted her words differently. She said, “I love having the spotlight on somebody else, and I much prefer it. It’s nice for all of that not to matter”

        By appearance I believe she meant her performance in act. Not her face. When you are acting to be someone in the movie, you are out there from your comfort zone showing your understanding of the character that you played by your act. People would judge your appearance in that character. They would either like the character you played or not. In any case it would put you on the spotlight. So I understand why she feels relieved to let other actress to take the spotlight.

        Since we are obviously have a different understanding on the subject, it seems pointless to keep continuing this discussion. 😉

  17. acidburn says:

    It’s impossible not to love these two people! 🙂

  18. Reel Wheel says:

    LOL – when you guys said the comment was hot, I though at least he would have lingered on a syllable or two. Didn’t feel it at all.

    Brad. Stop Campaigning. Now

  19. samira677 says:

    Stop whining. Brad is doinh the same as everybody else. He just gets more attention.

    • Jin says:

      lol at the people who think Brad and Angelina are above it just because the people who do work for them in manipulating their image in the press aren’t labeled “publicists”. They have a whole team of people to keep them out there. How do you think Brad Pitt is handling this long Oscar campaign? How do you think Angelina makes sure photos of her being a good mommy or doing charity come out just around the time any negative story about them comes out. Open your eyes people.

    • Katherine says:

      The studio handles Oscar campaigns. They have a whole separate budget for it. Studios often hire PR firms that specialize in Oscar and awards campaigning. Just like they handle promotion of the film itself and the other Oscars it hopes to get for the film.

      Brad is obligated to cooperate to some extent. His co-producing responsibilities for Moneyball require him to sell it. Since an Oscar win historically generates more money and exposure for a film – even one already released – what kind of producer would he be if he didn’t go along with the studio’s Oscar campaign?

      People in the industry who know Brad personally always comment on his reluctance to campaign for awards for himself. I am glad to see that he is more cooperative this time around. His reluctance to campaign for himself for Jesse James saw his incredible performance overlooked that year despite great reviews. Instead Brad pushed Casey Afleck for his nominations.

      This year he not only put in TWO excellent and award worthy performances but he worked hard to make these TWO excellent films a reality. The industry has been enriched by his work.

    • Josephina says:

      @ Poprocks-

      OR….maybe Katherine just likes the couple with six kids, admires the fact that they are a very ACCOMPLISHED and RECOGNIZED couple, …when they show up at the red carpet people stop and stare and yell and holler.

      She is NOT in denial of their beauty or star power…YOU ARE. The Kardashians will never be invited to the White House or invited to join the prestigious Counsel of Foreign Relations.

      I am a proud fan of the “Brange” because they lead an interesting and adventurous life. There has never been another Hollywood family like them. They are a united family, with solid acting careers, with similar goals and interests, with mutual love and respect for each other.

      And I will never tire of watching the Jolie-Pitt loving family, just like I will never tire of watching Meryl Streep, Sandra Bullock, Gary Oldman and Tom Cruise.

    • Jaxx says:

      @Katherine: Ah, the voice of reason. As you said, if Brad didn’t cooperate with the campaign he would be derelect in his duty to his studio and his film. Oscars generate money. Studios don’t make movies for nothing. Period. An Oscar will also make Brad’s salary go up for his next picture.

      I don’t understand why there is so much resentment because Brad tries to earn the fruits of his industry’s labor. Anyone with a job tries to earn bonuses, advancement, promotions, raises. An Oscar awards all those things. Every single person who labors at anything wants recognition for their efforts. So Brad is repulsive because he wants some? Please. People condemn him for doing the very same thing they would do in his position. And there is the rub. Few people are in his position and they are frothing at the mouth with jealousy and resentment.

  20. blonde on the dock says:

    Nauseating is right. They are so in love with themselves. I’m just waiting for the day when the facade starts to crumble.

    • gab says:

      Right there with you, Blonde! Then I’ll pop some corn and pull up a seat to watch these two.

      • Mari says:

        Hoho, you’ll probably get some Hemorrhoids for sitting down that long, geta cushion on that chair!

  21. maemay says:

    Ever since Seal and Heidi, i’m looking at celeb couple over-sharing another way. We know Brandge is the ultimate and saintly and all that jazz but this is approaching overkill.

    • Tiffany27 says:

      Agreed. I do think Brad and Angie will be together for a long time though. Besides the 6 kids, I think they both realize staying together is good for their careers and images.

      • blonde on the dock says:

        There’s a ton of money riding on these two. That’s why they play up the relationship. Who knows? In reality they might hate each others guts!

  22. I.want.shoes says:

    I love her. He bores me to death.

  23. Euphorima says:

    Gosh, after all this campaigning, what a bummer it would be if he DOES NOT actually win the Oscar….would have all been a total waste.

    Well best of luck to him though.

    • Josephina says:

      Having a full life and a great loving family is how you “win” in life, so they have already won.

      Winning an award is nice…it shows recognition for your work and provides additional validation…

      Brad has been nominated 3 TIMES in the last 4/5 years … Does his acting now have to be reduced to whether or not he wins? GMAFB.

      If he wins, great! If he doesn’t…keep doing the great work and create a legacy of great work.

  24. serena says:

    That really made me hot.

  25. Julia says:

    In a time where many ‘solid perceived’ couples are splitting left and right, i am glad to hear them still being hot for each other and going on strong.

    But I am tired of this round of interviews in a very short period of times for the Oscar campaign.

    Not that I don’t like Brad, i just prefer Angelina, her intelligence, eloquence and interests. Plus i think she is the more charismatic element in that couple.

  26. Sue says:

    Threw up in mouth a little when I read this…….

    • Sue says:

      Guess I should have said when I read header. Because there is no way I am reading article, only wanted to commet.

  27. jinni says:

    I wonder if the tabs are going to make the connection between Paul Newman leaving his first wife for his second wife Joanne Woodward, who he met on the set of a movie, to the triangle of doom. They’ll probably take his comparison as a sign of admitting guilt. Also, that despite calling Joanne the love of his life he still cheated on her throughout their marriage. The tabs will probably than insinuate that Brad is cheating on Angie. You know they look for every angle to throw sh*t at her.

    Anyway, it’s great that she still has that side of her (the mommy thing does get a bit boring and repetitive), but I just can’t think of this admission as hot because I feel like it’s being wasted on Brad. I just have never gotten the hype about them as a couple. If this had been Jonny Lee or Colin Farrell(alleged ex-lover) that would be hot, but Brad is just so not sexy to me.

    • MorticiansDoItDeader says:

      Jinni have you met Courtney? I think you two would get along famously!

      • jinni says:

        I was actually expecting Courtney to put that info out there, but I guess I got here first. Anyway, I’m just a fan of Paul’s movie and know about his history. I’m not going to start connecting every thread I post on to Paul Newman or any other Old Hollywood gossip/lore, though.

    • skuddles says:

      Did Paul Newman really cheat on Joanne throughout their marriage??? I’ve never heard that before…. disillusioned.

      • jinni says:

        Maybe not at the very end, but I did hear that he cheated on her on several occasion during their marriage. Is it really hard to believe that a person that steps out on one relationship wouldn’t cheat in the next, especially considering how the second relationship started? But if you don’t believe me it’s no skin off my teeth.

      • MorticiansDoItDeader says:

        @Jinni, I love that you got that 😉 and we can only have one Paul/Joanne expert here. At some point you’ll probably have to have a hypothetical Newman/woodward fact duel to the death. It’s kind of like highlander 😜 “two men enter, one man leaves.” I’ve got my money on you!

      • jinni says:

        @Morticiansdoitdeader:
        Oh I don’t think my singular attempt will ever compete with sheer volume of posts Courtney dedicates to Paul and Joanne, but I thank you for your faith in me.

    • Pam says:

      I’d compare them more to Richard Burton and Elizabeth Taylor. Or even MORE accurate Eddie Fisher and Elizabeth Taylor! Liz was VERY much the Angelina of her day when Eddie left “America’s sweetheart” Debbie Reynolds for her! Angie hasnt met her “Richard Burton” yet but something tells me the thing with Brad is gonna get pretty boring and old and someone else is gonna sweep her off her feet! As handsome as he is he’s just TOO sane for her. She actually used Brad to change that “bad girl’ image she had during the earlier years of her career. People then were talking about how weird she was and Brad Pitt was way more popular than she was!Since she’s hooked up with Brad her image went from being weird and strange to this Saintly Earth mother care about the world image overnight. Talk about a brilliant PR move! She got Brad at the right time! His marriage was on the rocks cause as he tearfully told Barbara Walters when he was married to Jen how badly he wanted a little girl. Angie had expressed she was looking for a “good man” to have kids with in another article. UREEKA! But I have a feeling there’s gonna be another man out there whos gonna totally knock Angie for a loop–and she’ll drop Brad fast!

      • Katherine says:

        Pam mistakenly thinks: “Since she’s hooked up with Brad her image went from being weird and strange to this Saintly Earth mother care about the world image overnight.”

        I think you missed some years in your imagionary timeline. Angelina started her humanitarian and international work years before she ever met Brad.

        Angelina also became a mother years before she met Brad.

        Angelina’s life as a mother and her work with the UN was talked about and written about in the media years before she met Brad.

        Afraid your “theory” doesn’t hold much water. If anyone’s rep as a serious person was helped by their getting together, it was Brad’s. I believe that Brad always had this serious and more worthwhile side to him before he met Angelina but that with her encouragement, and maybe even her example, it flowered.

      • Maya says:

        I’d agree with you. However Elizabeth and Richard were 1000 times the actors that Brad and Angelina are.
        There is no way on earth that Brad can ever pull of Shakespeare, whereas Burton memorized all plays and Elizabeth’s acting range exceeded Angelina’s.

      • jinni says:

        Well I was just using the Paul Newman angle because Brad’s career was compared to his.

      • Pam says:

        The point is Katherine nobody paid attention to Angie’s charity work or her adopting UNTIL she hooked up with Brad Pitt! Was it written about? Sure. But her popularity was certainly not at the level that it is now–even you’ve got to admit that! Her reputation was still very much foggy. If you knew YOUR HISTORY since you’re obiviously a fan you’d know this! She surely didnt have all of these women fans fawning over her back then most of them problably really fans of Brad and feel that Angie is the appropriate partner for the “Sexiest Man Alive”. You would think we should all know by now with the long history a beautiful couples breaking up in Hollywood including Richard and Liz that beauty and fame arent the backbone of a good relationship. As far as Brad being “serious” now that he is with her, he always changed himself to match whatever girlfriend he is/was with at the time. Charity work existed long before he got with Angie.You can’t say he was never aware before.
        Maya you totally make a good point about Burton and Taylors acting skill’s being superior.As good as they looked at least they backed it up with talent!

      • aprayerforthewildatheart says:

        @Pam
        In 2003 20/20 dedicated an entire episode to an interview that Barbara Walters did with Angie. The subjects ran from BBT, to Maddox, to her UNHCR work, and to her opinions and feelings about sex. It also included footage, and talk about the land she’d purchased in Cambodia, that she planned to live there off and on with her son Maddox, and how she’d had to have the land de-mined, before she could build on it.

        This was summer 2003. She’d never met Pitt yet. There was a huge amount of interest in her pre Brad Pitt. So much so Babs made her promise to come back and be interviewed again, which she did in 2004. And they again spoke of both her public, and private life, including her UNHCR work.

  28. Wendy says:

    Given how she looks these days, “bad girl” probably means eating more than 500 calories a day. Anything more is not for consumption at all, public or otherwise.

    Not only did I really enjoy the (silent) movie that is The Artist, but I’m also enjoying the relative silence of whatever Oscar campaign Harvey has cooked up for it.

    Maybe if we buy Pitt and Clooney a Jack Russell terrier each, they’ll stop oversharing?

  29. foozy says:

    give me more brangelina any day!!!

  30. Asli says:

    Usually I don’t get hot for Brad but damn… I need a cooooooooold shower.

  31. Bellebeesting says:

    Brad…sit. Stay. Stop barking.

  32. Ogechi says:

    I’m not a fan & will NEVER but I must say that a real man never talks about what his woman is like sexually. If shes a bad girl & he is excited about that, he needs to keep that to himself….otherwise he might find some other guy trying to find out if its true or not. All these for publicity huh?

    • Katherine says:

      “a real man never talks about what his woman is like sexually.”

      Please. Real men sing the praises of their partners all the time. Brad isn’t going into any details at all. He’s just saying she’s still sexy to him. Any man who can’t say his partner is still sexy or beautiful to them is not much of a man.

  33. olivia says:

    “Not for public consumption” but I am talking about it in an interview. No disconnect there.

    Or does he mean she doesn’t get around as much anymore?

  34. Jin says:

    lmao they are so desperate to make everyone think they have this hot love life. So sick of them. They need to get over themselves and have some class because the couples who do have a steamy life, don’t talk about it. They just worry that people look at the fact that they have all those kids and think they aren’t a sexy couple anymore.

  35. aprayerforthewildatheart says:

    If you look at the myriad of venues through which BP has done these interviews, you can see they’re trying to hit all demographics to promote both films, and Brad for Oscar. I mean from Inside The Actors Studio to CBS This Morning, the audience between even just those two shows is broad to say the least.

    If one didn’t follow HW press, they may only see one interview. If a person does follow what is trending, they might be on overload by now.

    I know that if I didn’t follow all of this campaigning online, I wouldn’t know much other than the nominations, as I watch very little TV. So, I see this situation as something I control, and would only get “overload” if I let it happen, which I don’t.

  36. koko says:

    I like how it is the same people posting over and over. All the nominees are campaigning but it is just the big guy who gets called out and all you people who have your pants in a twist over people u claim not to care about is funny.

    • lisa says:

      Totally agree.

      I think the anger is that he and she actually seem happy and together because they love each other. It is funny how when a negative story is posted these same people are all over it. Angie cheats, Brad hung up on the ex, Brad walks out, Angie on drugs. anything. So many tabloids talking about them, their children their sex life you name it. But if they talk about their lives and put their answer to the lies then it is TMI.. or they should shut up. Brad is promoting his film. YOU hear about all of them because it is BRAD.. Jean was on The Today show this morning. nothing about him.. why? because all these people that are “tired of Brad” didn’t watch the interview. Didn’t give a shit about it. No post on what he said. But Brad yes.

      I for one would listen to him talk about his life then tabloids and gossip sites that do so every single day and week.

      Now it’s his turn’

      KEEP TALKING BRAD AS MUCH AS YOU WANT. The people that don’t like it should stop listening.. but they either wont’ or can’t..

      By the way.. he looked so good.

      • aprayerforthewildatheart says:

        “So many tabloids talking about them, their children their sex life you name it. But if they talk about their lives and put their answer to the lies then it is TMI”

        Perfect statement, lisa. Maybe they’d like to own their own story for once. Maybe they’d like to comment on what they KNOW to be true. It is “their” life together after all.

        The tabloids don’t own their lives, they just act like they do. The tabs are nothing but negative about the JPs life, all while they line their pockets with horrid tales about the JPs, and their kids.

        I can’t imagine having my life twisted, and attacked at every turn without wanting to give my own truth.

        It’s not as if you see them on Twitter, answering to/battling every story about them that’s out there, and trying to justify themselves is it? No.

      • Freya says:

        Exactly! Don’t like it, don’t listen, don’t watch.

      • Camille (The original) says:

        I agree with you. Great comments.

        It was a good interview IMO.

    • Freya says:

      True! They all want to win so they’re all campaigning, but only Brad gets criticized.

  37. Jamie says:

    The thought of Bonegelina in the buff is such a gross thought. Seven years ago this might have been hot, but not anymore. She is so emaciated.

  38. Mae says:

    It is sooooo important for her to make people think she’s so freaky and bad. You don’t tell people you are that if you are. You just are!!! It is weird how they try to spin everything….they are probably so ultra boring in the sack. She falls asleep, he dreams about Jen….all the bad stuff is happening in their dreams. See through!!!!

    • Josephina says:

      Stop taking drugs. Now.

      He dreams about Jen ?!?!?!?!?!?

      BWAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      • Julia says:

        Aniston hen at his/her best.

        They have given DELUSION its nobility letters.

        I like it when they like to paint the Brange fans as delusional when they have been living in total delusion for the past decade painting a slipping in hell and years of therapy of a dead end union a rosy marriage , all around fantasy, whishful thinking, imaginery to the core, imagining babies, inventing misscarriages, pregnancies, reunions of the fake golden couple, romances with actors they selected as the one for Jen, a weird reality that only exist in a parallel universe…

        But the Brange fans who live in the reality of the existing prolific Brange couple are the ones delusional…yeah right !

    • aprayerforthewildatheart says:

      There’s something so FF about this post…”he dreams about Jen”…

      Yes! Because we all dream about our exes that we dumped because we didn’t want to be with them anymore. Doesn’t everyone do that?

      I SO wish I could get back with my ex-boyfriend…Oh wait, he’s that CREEPER I friended on facebook out of pity, who asked me out numerous times, and even sent e-mails to my friends asking that they encourage me to take him up on his offer, that I was then forced to BLOCK! God I miss him…

      HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAA!!

  39. barrio girl says:

    gross! they’re old!

  40. CHRISTIAN_GIRL says:

    Unless you people are hearing specifics, he has NOT given up TMI. He is certainly inferring Hotness, but what exactly did he reveal? Nothing.

    Their tease can sure rile up emotions. We know no more now than before. Details people. What jumps off? We don’t know, because NEITHER has told us. Never has. You only think you know what he is talking about. That IS how you do an interview. You lead your listeners. So yeah, she’s still a bad girl and delightfully so. Too funny Brad. Big reveal, to still keep us guessing.

    As for their kids, we know what? Shiloh likes swords like a tomboy, Mad is fearless, Knox is a lil dude, Viv is gracefull and elegant, Pax is wild with freedom, Zee is a lil mommy. Really, that’s TMI. Heck, we could tell that by the pics. Again, making us think we know stuff, but we don’t. Quite clever actually, but we are not peering into their daily lives. We are NOT privy to their 24/7, never have been.

    Think what you want, but truthfully we are totally closed off to their actual lives, we see only their public lives at certain points and this Oscar season is one. We are not getting any NEW info, just said differently to appear enlightning. I am loving it. We probably know the least about them as a couple or family, but we are certainly made to think we do.

    • fayefaye252 says:

      Hey Christian Girl: I remember a line Jerry Springer once used when people complained about his show. “That’s why you have a remote, to change the channel.” People, people, people, your comments remind me of that. If you don’t like Brad and/or Angie, and prefer his x, that’s why you have a mouse. You don’t have to read anything about them, look at pictures, etc. All you have to do is take your mouse and click on something else. People are now complaining Brad is giving TMI. I, for one, am glad to get these little tidtibs. And that’s all they are, little. Bet when he was talking about his x, everybody loved it. I’m loving the things he’s saying. Loving the fact he’s in love with Angie. Loving the fact he’s in love with his children. If you don’t like it, click and move on. Nuff said.

    • Rhea says:

      ITA. I am thinking the same thing. They are basically only gives a bit info and most of their answers are same for years!!

    • aprayerforthewildatheart says:

      @CHRISTIAN_GIRL
      I always enjoy your posts. All the beating of the negativity drums is old and redundant. It’s refreshing to read opinions that are free of the hyperbole of hate, or hero worship drool. Here’s to having an opinion free of emotion, and based upon facts over tabloid fiction. 🙂

  41. teri says:

    Nothing gross or old about Brad or Angelina. Very sexy and hot. Glad to see a woman that after seven years can still light his fire.

    • barrio girl says:

      have you seen her body? it’s like an 80 year old woman body and full of veins and tats eew! i feel sorry for brad pitt, he’s stuck with that.

      • dede says:

        bwhaha Brad has been happy with that body for 7 years and counting..YOU may not like it but who cares cuz YOU dont matter..all that matters is that Brad likes it..hes had other women with nice bodies and left them so obviously thats not his major concern anyways..you haters slay me..keep em coming Brad..the more you ppl comment that you cant stand them the more popular you make them

      • barrio girl says:

        are you sure Brad is happy with that body! LOL …he thought he got the most beautiful woman in the world..she even wears a weave HAHAHA!!

      • Freya says:

        As dede wrote, you don’t matter.

        If you don’t plan to be 36, which is ‘old,’ that’s your choice.

      • aprayerforthewildatheart says:

        Whomever said “Beauty is in the eye of the beholder” was right. Everyone has a different opinion on what they find beautiful.

        After many years of being with the same person it’s easy to forget that you once found them beautiful. It takes a little work, maybe even just a minute out of your day to look at that person and pretend that it’s the first time you ever saw them.

        Love is many things, attraction being one of the first to spark interest, but interest would not last long in a world full of beauty, without something more. People need to share common interests, respect, learn together, have adventures together.

        It’s very easy to sit back and judge a person based upon what you see. Thankfully most humans are more complex. Love is what you FEEL when you see that person who you, at first, only saw as beautiful.

    • DeeVine says:

      Yes, she can definitely light a fire if she rubs her bony arms together.

    • Josephina says:

      @ the silly little posters DEEP in denial…

      Uh…Fool…HOW do you think those children got here?

      He loves touching her, his hand is always on her ass. He always has a sly grin on his face. His eyes tell us that he’s hit the jackpot.

      For those of us with healthy sex lives, we know what’s up.

      • barrio girl says:

        you’re too funny! haha.. and to those who said I don’t matter, YOU don’t matter to them either! lol! 2 middle age talking about their sex life..gross! i know iknow agelina jolie is only 36 but she looks 50!!

      • Toni says:

        @ Josephina

        “He loves touching her.”
        WHEN THE CAMERAS ON THEM……
        “his hand is always on her ass.”
        WHAT ASS?

        He always has a sly grin on his face.
        WHEN THE CAMERAS ON THEM……..

        “His eyes tell us that he’s hit the jackpot”

        His eyes say TRAPPED to me!

        “For those of us with healthy sex lives, we know what’s up”

        People who value the private part of their lives and really have happy healthy sex lives DONT TALK ABOUT IT TO THE NEWS!

      • Josephina says:

        Yep, the haters are losing it!!!

        @ Tony–

        Surely you don’t think the ONLY time his hand rests on her ass is during photos? Perhaps you should look at ALL of the YouTube coverage over the LAST 7 YEARS of red carpet appearances.

        Using your intellect, I guess that cruise ship didn’t sink after all, you didn’t SEE the ship sink, you only SAW PHOTOS. GMAFB.

        Lastly, did you not hear Brad say that his sex life with Angie is “not open to public consumption?”

        It hurts to know that they probably get buckwild… Who knows? Maybe one day someone will still find you sexy after 7 years and 6 babies…Probably not.

  42. hopeso says:

    THAT’S ANGIE’S MAN!!!!!!!

    • Pass it on says:

      I feel bad for her because she got the bradpitt in his old insecure years. He wears foundation, eyeliner, lifts,Botox, Weave, dye, and who knows what else. Life with him must be tres stressfull.

    • Toni says:

      Correction: WHIMP

  43. naturegirl says:

    With No Apology…..

  44. Maya says:

    This interview is just pre-Oscars advertising for the film. The same old, same old. Boring. She said her bit, he is saying his bit.
    Whatever.
    In my experience couples that sing their sexual praises too loudly raise other questions, like whether there is smoke without fire. Then there are celebrity examples of over sharing their sexual ‘attraction’ – Seal and Heidi Klum are one such example.

    • dede says:

      you all said the SAME thing when Angie made those comments about enjoying sex while pregnant and that was FOUR years ago..lol..keep counting down till the breakup

  45. DeeVine says:

    I would be so embarassed if my husband said on national tv i was “still a bad girl” , but i guess i don’t have a brand to sell.

    To me her bad girl image was heroin and famewhoring by kissing her brother and carrying vials of blood etc. i didn’t find that hot at all!

  46. original sandy says:

    never, never!!!! get tire of the brange, if i did, i would not click on and say that i am, there are very few celebs that i just can’t stomach,kardashians,jen lopez,jen aniston,lindsey lohan,leeann rimes, they have no talent and will do almost everything to stay in the head lines, it’s pathetic that they Conn some people, but not all. so you will never catch me on there thread unless, i want to just be mean for a day.

  47. Pass it on says:

    True story…Brad wears blue eyeliner

  48. Snowflake says:

    love brad and angie! their sex life must be so hot!! whew!

  49. jes_sayin says:

    Their ‘perfect love affair’ image to the public is so phony. So obvious. And all the choreographed PDA for the cameras – its just embarrassing.

    The more perfection they project, you know the more troubling it must really be in reality.

  50. Mae says:

    See through couple and SHALLOW…they are truly boring now. BORING…wish they could be happy with that. Trust me for a couple that doesn’t read anything about them…they will hear all this negative stuff and be on a rampage touching smooching blah blah blah…predictable…

  51. Lindy says:

    Oh STFU already!! Seriously, for eff’s sake, quit! God, when will this Oscar campaign be over–please make it soon. This is so dumb. I never comment on Brange posts, mostly because I want it ALL to go away (the whole triangle, the whole 9 yards, all of it, I am not team anybody). But I have to say, this is just blatant and cheesy and tacky.

  52. Camille (The original) says:

    It must be a slow day over at Dlisted by the looks of things on this thread. 🙄

    • IC says:

      Thoughts about this interview: 1) the make up artist should win an award He looked great, 2) He has smoked too much weed or drank too much–his thought process is all over the place. He kept having to pause before answering simple Qs. And/or he is becoming like his wife and checking himself before a word comes out of this mouth—trying to sound smarter than he is. 3) He can’t hold eye contact around certain issues. I’m no expert, but I think he was lying at least 3x. 4) I agree with some other respondents that they are ‘selling’ this marriage and family for their own benefit. Dragging children around the world at your own whim–feeding them soda to get them out of bed—and making them pack their own bags—WTF? Children need stability. They have enough money to be with their children in one home. That many children need their mother and father—not a group of nannies.

    • Bohemia says:

      Nah. All the AWESOME REAL LOVE crashed the FF site – the ultimate St. Angie altar… looooooool!

  53. CHRISTIAN_GIRL says:

    He REALLY set people off, Didn’t he. BY what he said or did he DO something?

    Maybe it was the twinkle in his eyes or the smile on his face. It could NOT be just him repeating what she said.

    We don’t know what they mean by “bad girl” btw. Our projections don’t count. They clearly know what they are talking about and it appears all warm and fuzzy. They have what seems a comfort and ease with each other, that they did not share with others. A tender sweetness that can turn to that something else that lots seem to fear.

    Good for them. He adores her. Better for them. He loves her. Best for them. The feelings appear mutual and reciprocated and love is equally shared. The kids reap the benefits. What more can anyone ask for?

    As for her physical body, REALLY? I believe ALL her parts are there. The shape of them don’t have to please us. Brad seems beyond pleased. I never slept with her so I can’t say what it’s like, but going by Brad these last 7+ years she must be something else. Great for him. He must be handling his business too, so great for her. We don’t share that. Thin, veiny, older, child birth is NEVER a problem when you love someone. I can’t be the only one who knows that kind of love. If I am, I will be sad for everyone else.

    Oh wait, was I only being baited? Jokes not on me or the JP’S, jokes on those in denial. Enjoy. Still a long awards season ahead of us of which the JP’S will be a part of. Others, not in this lifetime. I think I just CUT that bait of my line.

    • Josephina says:

      Bravo and well said. Unfortunately, I think you are right. Too many of the hens posting, who lack insight of any kind, have yet to experience real love in their own lives and therefore doubt what is so obvious in front of them.

      Angie loves Brad and Brad loves Angie. This IS the deepest and most fulfilling relationship either one has ever experienced. Both have stated in the last 7 years how much one means to the other. The more Brad expresses his UNDIVIDED love for Angie, the bigger the JenHen meltdown. HAHA!

      BTW, Aniston HAD THE NERVE to mention Brad and Angie in her latest INSTYLE magazine interview.

      You Jenhens say the tabloids and the media made up the triangle?

      SMH…She wants y’all to know NOW there never was any bad blood between her, Brad and Angie. Yep, she’s telling a random interviewer this but she forgot to inform her BFFs Chelsea Handler…and Sheryl Crow…and Laura Dern.

      Aniston has MAJOR issues. Aniston is STILL COATTAILING…after 7 years and 6 babies… She FEEDS the media AGAIN by linking herself to the Brange.

      An article with no reference to them reveals that she is truly a nonfactor to most people, except for the lonely hearts of rejected women still holding a torch for the men that left them… STILL CLUELESS years later as to why they were left behind.

  54. Divorcee says:

    I’m so glad Brad is whipped by Angelina, and he should be with six kids. Angelina’s got it made and she knows it! How many women with alot of money will be all over Brad now that he’s got all those kids, not many if any. I am glad he’s talking about Jolie this time and not how miserable he was with Jennifer. He started to sound like a broken record and a p**sy. He wasn’t man enough to tell Jennifer that I see. Now he’s stuck with Angelina, and she’s stuck their kids on him. It’s a good thing too Angelina’s not leaving Brad for someone else. And why should she? She’s got a built in babysitter, any other man she probably would have to take care of financially.

    • Pam says:

      Well he said he liked a “bad” girl. Everyone loves a “baddie’ once in their lives….until the bad guy or girl starts to act bad toward them. Angie may be with Brad for now but I really don’t think she’s actually met the guy who is going to REALLY whip her into place. I don’t think Brad is that guy by a long shot! 7 years is not a long time for a relationship. 20 years yes–7 years NO. She’s doing the “mother-charity” thing for their image now but she’s problably bored out of her mind and waiting for an opportunity.

      • Josephina says:

        @ Pam

        Brad is probably every bit of a “bad boy” (See Tyler Durden of Fight Club) as Angie is a “bad girl.” These two actually make a great match. They don’t have any regrets because of everything that happened in their lives brought them together.

        Jen was not the one for Brad. If Brad’s marriage was so wonderful, he wouldn’t have longed for something else, been in therapy and desire a better quality life. Billy Bob rejected Maddox as his son, and Angie refused to stay with a man who would not be a father to her child. Brad and Angie are soulmates.

      • Pam says:

        @ Josephina
        Brad Pitt was and still is Hollywood’s Crowned Prince. Billy Bob wasn’t. He was more suitable for Angie’s “badness” than Brad is but she badly needed an upgrade in her image and career. Her partnership with Brad has made her more famous and bankable than all of her movies put together including ‘Girl Interupted. Jen might have not been the one for him but one cant help question if Brad would even still be with Angie if it werent for all of those kids and their public grabbing brand worthy image.

      • Josephina says:

        @ Pam

        If you refuse to believe what you see, and what Brad and Angie say about each other, how can you ever get close to the truth?

        The family and kids were PLANNED and CREATED over 7 years while the media and Aniston watched, befuddled in confusion and amazement. Adoption is a deliberate choice… So is having six kids.

        Brad and Angie CHOSE to have a large family, which is a huge part of their happiness and they have said MANY, MANY times and yet you are still trying to play devil’s advocate?

        On the red carpet, in live interviews, talk shows, magazine articles… How many more interviews do you need to see where Brad/Angie talk about the joy of parenthood before you get the idea that they love being parents to a large family? Being a parent is a deliberate choice and a very happy and large part of their life. And they wouldn’t have it any other way.

        You really ARE the devil’s advocate, huh?

  55. Divorcee says:

    Brad just needs to marry Angelina and make an honest woman out of her.

  56. Bohemia says:

    I LOVE Brangelina! i love tha Brad stil talks about Angie! Nothing haters do is gonna change that. Go Brad! She’s a REAL BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD GIRL! mmmmmm, yum yum!

  57. Bohemia says:

    BRAD KEEP TALKING! I LOVE IT!

  58. Bohemia says:

    Keep the sexy quotes coming, Brad! Grrrrr! i love it, Brad! I wanna do BAAAAD things to you too! I’d be bitchin’ TOO if IT were the EX and her ‘Roux piece… jenhags, can eat their hearts out… you get a pass. LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL! 😀 😀 :D!

  59. Jayna says:

    Yuk. I have a feeling their sexlife is a lot more lacking than people would assume.

  60. sm255 says:

    Okay, now he’s treading into creepy Daniel Radcliffe territory. And now I need brain bleach because I don’t want to imagine Cruella DeVille and ‘The Guy Who Looks Like My Sleazy Uncle’ doing the horizontal limbo.

    • Divorcee says:

      Brad has gotten old looking quick. His parents look good for their ages, and even his sibilings.

  61. NM6804 says:

    People in the beginning of the thread said it best.

  62. S says:

    Pitt and Jolie are two very hard-working showboats indeed. They know exactly how to sell their “brand” and make a profit, and will do whatever they need to do to stay in the limelight. It’s really not that deep. And neither is either one of them.

  63. TheRealMcCoy says:

    Guess the pledge to not get married until “everyone is able to get married” doesn’t apply anymore. It was all a publicity stunt from the very beginning. What a couple of fakes. And we (the dumb adoring american public) give them the billions they don’t deserve.