Britney Spears wanted her new body to grace the cover of Vogue, and promised to deliver the exclusive first pictures of Jayden James free to the glossy. Vogue balked at her offer and turned her down. They must be wary of being associated with Britney, who is much more suited for the covers of all the tabloids she’s been gracing:

Vogue magazine has turned its nose up at Britney Spears! The high-end fashion magazine was approached by the newly-single star to run the first photos of Britney with her second son with Kevin Federline, Jayden James. “She really wanted the photos to run in Vogue, but they turned her down,” a source tells Star. “She’s now reconsidering her options.” It’s a big blow for Brit, who adores the magazine, and was featured on its cover in November 2001.

But there are takers for the pictures. The source tells Star, “She’s been offered $2 million by another publication,” adding Britney has not yet decided if she’ll take the magazine’s offer.

Britney reportedly does not want the photos to run in People magazine, where she placed the first-look photos of her first son Sean Preston, because she wants to take a cue from Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes, who debuted their daughter Suri on the cover of high-end glossy magazine Vanity Fair.

Another reason Britney might not want to use People is that they would probably pay her handsomly for the photos, and half of the proceeds might go to K-Fed in the divorce.

Here is Britney outside a CVS with her manager wearing a Santa hat and a see through half turtleneck sweater with a bright blue bra underneath. I wonder why Vogue doesn’t want to be associated with her?

Thanks to BreatheHeavy.com for these photos.