Stylish Celebrity Escapism
Contributing Writers
Nov 13
'06
Britney too trashy for Vogue

Written by Celebitchy

Posted in Britney Spears, Magazines, Photos

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

3 Responses to “Britney too trashy for Vogue”

  1. Mr. T:
    November 13th, 2006 at 2:04 pm

    Chaulk one up to Vogue for being a class act. Kudo’s!

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  2. Pepper:
    November 13th, 2006 at 4:03 pm

    She should do the pics for free to her choice of magazine, if they want them..that way the Wart (aka The Free-Loader) won’t get any procedes !!

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  3. Melissa:
    November 13th, 2006 at 8:32 pm

    Eh just let her mom or sister sell the photos and she can still get the money…off the books.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

Recent Comments:
  • CandyKay: I agree with Celebitchy about the opening monologue, which seemed a little desperate. I wasn’t as...
  • xDEWx: def she is the queen of pop ^^
  • Claudia: Honestly, I didn’t think the opening monologue was that bad. Just because there were lots of politics...
  • Sham: Can you say Birth Control…..dam the first child ain’t even a year old yet… Give your body a...
  • Scott F.: Again, you’re entirely missing the point. It’s a question of degrees, not absolutes. Your...
  • jacqueline: Its very common- its trapped air (even very painful for adults if not “expelled”)- yeh,...
  • breederina: Scott if you honestly believe that History Channel, Discovery Channel, and Animal Planet don’t have...
  • CB Rawks: Goodness Rottenkitty, what a nasty and unnecessary diatribe. What’s stuck up your arse? I was saying...
 
 

Celebitchy is a celebrity gossip site written by several independent authors. The opinions of the authors are their own and do not necessarily represent the opinions of the site owner. All information on this site is for entertainment purposes only. Articles are based on rumor, conjecture, and published information in other sources. The site makes no claims that content is valid, accurate, or true. The site owner and the authors contributing to it will not be held liable for damages resulting from errors, omissions or falsehoods published on this site. It is not the site owner or the contributing authors' intention to defame or malign any particular group, religion, ethnic group, club, organization, company, or individual. The site owner is not responsible for content on linked or quoted sources. All comments made by visitors to the blog are the responsibility of their respective authors and are only sporadically monitored. The site owner will not be held liable for comments in any way.