Angelina Jolie cancels summer wedding plans, Brad Pitt cries about it

I’ve been surprised by the lack of wall-to-wall coverage for Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie’s wedding plans. I always thought that if they ever got around to getting engaged, the tabloids would be in meltdown mode, and if they ever get married, the tabloids will have a field day with “DIVORCE!” headlines. But maybe, at long last, the tabloids are tired of playing the same old storyline? Probably not. In Touch Weekly reported a few weeks ago that Brad and Angelina might marry as soon as next weekend, just before Angelina begins work on Maleficent. But when Brad was flying solo at the Cannes Film Festival, he claimed that he and Angelina were very far from setting a date. Which is what Katie Nichol at The Mail says too – that Angelina is about to do back-to-back projects and Brad is pissed that she’s putting their nuptials on hold:

Angelina Jolie and her fiance Brad Pitt have put their wedding plans on ice. The Hollywood A-listers, who finally got engaged in the spring after an eight-year courtship, were rumoured to be marrying at their chateau in the South of France this summer, with Brad reported to be planning the nuptials.

But Angelina’s busy work schedule means the ceremony is likely to be postponed.

Angelina, 36, set tongues wagging when she did not join Brad for the premiere of his movie Killing Them Softly at the festival. Now I’m told their wedding plans are in chaos after she agreed to make three movies back-to-back.

The couple, left, are currently based in Richmond, South-West London, with their six children while Angelina films Disney’s Maleficent.

The pair have an arrangement whereby they never work at the same time, and Brad, 48, is looking after their children while Angelina embarks on her marathon filming session, which includes Salt 2 and a probable role in Danny Boyle’s next movie.

‘Brad isn’t happy that Angelina has taken on all this work as it has scuppered plans for a summer wedding,’ says a source. ‘He is taking on less work to be with the children and Ang’s father, Jon Voight, is also flying to the UK to help out.’

[From The Mail]

As far as I know, Angelina will probably just be working on Maleficent this year. Salt 2 is listed on her IMDB as “announced” – and I’m guessing that they don’t even have a working script yet (incidentally, the script for the first Salt SUCKED). Angelina’s also supposed to do that Versace project with Ridley Scott, although they probably won’t get around to it until next year. So… while I don’t think a Brangelina summer wedding is in the cards, I think Brad and Angelina’s autumn and winter looks pretty clear. Would Angelina be an autumn bride?

Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

123 Responses to “Angelina Jolie cancels summer wedding plans, Brad Pitt cries about it”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. lisa says:

    Let’s see the tabloids are the ones that were speculating on when they would get married. Going so far as to print an actual date. Now that they are proven wrong the new story is the wedding is cancelled. How do you cancel something that was never planned. LOL

    Brad also said that he would not be working a lot this year. Focusing more on Producing. Which is the case. His roles in Twelve year a slave and The Counselor are very small parts. Only needing a couple of days of filming. He said that Angie would be working a lot this year so she will be doing some back to back project. It is just that the media doesn’t know what and won’t until she decides to let them.

    The media just proves again how they know squat. All those sources and they didn’t know she was not going to Cannes or the wedding date/location.

    funny seeing them spin

  2. watchingyoubitchh says:

    mondieu no summer wedding?!nooooooooooooooooooooooo

    as long they wed cos they make an amazing couple.i am all about the dress-i bet she s gonna dress a white Sack

  3. Cleveland Girl says:

    Brad looks like crap.

    • Bobo says:

      Yes. Yes he does.

      • Marjalane says:

        Those pictures make him look like he’d fit into any one of the TLC shows about Hoarders, or Pawn stars. Maybe “Meth Madness” or something. Seriously low-rent.

    • LeeLoo says:

      I think he looks good. I’ve always had a thing for rugged looking men though.

      • Trek Girl says:

        @LeeLoo: I agree with you. I understand what people are saying when they say he looks “unkempt”, “dirty”, or like he isn’t aging well, but I like the way he looks and I think he actually is aging well.

        When it comes to Brad Pitt and how he dresses, I don’t really care, because he changes the way he dresses when it matters, which is when he is ACTING. He can dress however he wants to otherwise.

    • Maria_Spain says:

      +1
      Im fed up with this 2

      • JudyK says:

        Brad doesn’t look rugged…he looks dirty and unkempt. Hate that look on him. Hate.It.

    • Lilalis says:

      He looks like the Dude. 🙂

      • Cait says:

        I bet you he doesn’t roll on Shabbas.

      • thatsh*tcray says:

        I came here to say that!

      • Veruca says:

        I’ve been saying for the last 2 years that Brad is slowly morphing into Jeff Bridges. If you see him in interviews, he even sounds like a Dude-in-Training.

        What’s this “Day of Rest” shit?!

    • Anonny says:

      Absolutely he does. And what’s with the wedding band on the right ring finger? Very European.

    • Jilliterate says:

      He looks like Kody from Sister Wives…

      YOU’VE SEEN IT! YOU CAN’T UN-SEE IT!

  4. tmbg says:

    I read somewhere else that he used that old line again about getting married when everyone can get married.

    But honestly, who knows with them?

  5. Ramaona says:

    What a attention whores. It’s no surprise. It will be very long engagement. There is a lot crappy movies to sell.

  6. LeeLoo says:

    Why is that Brad looks gray and rugged and I think he looks absolutely gorgeous? I never had any attraction to Brad Pitt until I saw these photos.

    I think it’ll be at least 2-3 years before they marry. They’be been together for 7 years, they’ve been in no rush thus far. I don’t see them in a race to go down the aisle.

  7. Rita says:

    All plans must be approved by Shiloh and she’s been a bit pissy lately so until Shiloh gives her blessing, everything is on hold.

  8. lower-case deb says:

    i don’t know why the tabs bothered to even waste ink and column spaces for this story.
    considering that everybody “knows”.
    well either knows there won’t be a wedding or knows that the tabs will be writing this.

    and there are still people who are willing to pay for this kind of swill?
    obviously no one told them that they could get a better deal by following celebitchy. (it’s free, and the things people write in the comments far surpass the meagre abilities of them tab writers in terms of eloquence, fun factor and entertainment value).

    gosh.

  9. dahlianoir says:

    Brad cries a lot these days… Poor thing xD

  10. Angi says:

    DAMN….Brad looks rough!

  11. Claire says:

    Damn you Angelina! Leaving that poor Brad alone running and crying and waving his hair because you don’t want to give him what he always wanted : A summer wedding.

    Damn you !

  12. Mara says:

    Angelina and Brad will never have peace in their personal life because of this gossip magazines but i think they don’t care or read this kind of gossip .

    • Red Granny says:

      Or they read sometimes and just have as much fun with it as we have 😉

  13. jilly says:

    I think they’re already married. They married that steamy summer in Africa when they were making Shiloh. That’s why there is no rush to make the public wedding happen. The private and more important one happened years ago.

    • Tapioca says:

      A quick Google search says Brad was still technically married to JA when Shiloh was conceived.

      Anyway, everything these people do is for publicity so they want the “will-they, won’t-they set the date” questions to continue. If it was about formally cementing their relationship in front of their kids they’d do it quietly in their own backyard then release one tasteful pic of the happy couple.

      I wonder if BP & AJ and Bey-Z are friends, because they both seem to have the same bizarre idea of “keeping their private lives private and totally not using their relationships as a brand”!

      • Emma - the JP lover says:

        @Tapioca, who wrote: “A quick Google search says Brad was still technically married to JA when Shiloh was conceived.”

        A quick Google search will also say that JA began her relationship with Vince Vaughn in July 2005 while she was still ‘technically’ married to Brad Pitt.

        Furthermore, since Shiloh was born on May 27, 2006 it means that Jen began her affair with Vince Vaughn a couple of months ‘before’ Shiloh was conceived. Google also says that Jen filed for divorce on March 23, 2005 and that the Aniston-Pitt divorce was final on October 2, 2005.

      • Tiegs says:

        @ Emma, I think Tapioca’s point is that they could not have legally gotten married around the time Shiloh was conceived, because Brad and Jennifer were still married. She would have been conceived late August, early September, and their divorce wasn’t finalised until October.

      • Sal says:

        The Judge signed off on their divorce in early August. the October 2 date was simply the archival date. They were formally divorced in August. Shiloh was conceived late August/ September.

      • Tiegs says:

        Untrue. Their divorce became finalised in October 2005. The dissolution papers were filed on August 19 2005 and the judge signed off on them, but neither would have been able to remarry until the divorce became final under California law without commiting bigamy. And yes, Shiloh was conceived while Brad was married, and no amount of semantics will change that.

      • Josephina says:

        @ Tapioca,

        Well according to your timeline, Aniston is the adulterer in her marriage to Pitt as she was photographed saddling Vince Vaughn and making out with him on a balcony in the spring/summer of 2005. There were never any pictures taken of Brad touching/kissing Angie in 2005.

        In fact, everyone thought that Vince and Jen would surely marry before Brad and Angie.

        It was obvious that both parties were dating once the divorce papers were filed, which is not a crime.
        n

      • Darwin says:

        Idiots! Tapioca is placing doubts on Shioh’s paternity not the semantics of adultery under California law. Learn to read jackasses.

    • Emma - the JP lover says:

      @Jilly, who wrote: “They married that steamy summer in Africa when they were making Shiloh.”

      They were in Africa (before they became an official couple) in April 2005. That summer they were busy promoting “Mr. and Mrs. Smith.” They were next in Africa as a couple ‘way’ after they conceived Shiloh (Angie’s bump looked about 5 or 6 months old).

      If Shiloh had been conceived during the summer of 2005, she would have been born in February or March 2006.

    • Freya says:

      Shiloh was born in Africa but she was made nine months before. Where were they nine months before Shiloh’s birth, roughly the middle of August 2005?

  14. DEVIL! says:

    Now where are these cheap women who accuse other prettier and beautiful women for depending on Botox?? Brad looks full of botox now.. haha…… whenever i see a megan fox, nicole kidman etc post. First thing i see is these women accusing them due to jealousy! THIS PROVES HOW SHALLOW WOMEN CAN BE!

    • Cherry says:

      I don’t get your point? Brad is not a woman and he’s clearly not using botox, so who’s being ‘cheap’ and ‘shallow’ here?

    • Sal says:

      Um….what on earth are you talking about? People are always saying Brad looks ‘old and haggard’. If he was using botox, he would look YOUNG. The problem is Brad is CLEARLY NOT using botox, when he would look better if he did.

  15. RubyTuesday says:

    He’s morphing into Benicio Del Toro.

  16. Samigirl says:

    For some reason, I could see her wanting a winter wedding. Not sure why I feel this way, but it’s just how I see it. God I hope she doesn’t wear a shapeless sack as her gown.

  17. olivia says:

    Jolie puts work before the wedding because her relationship with Pitt was always about her career. She has what she wants with or without a wedding.

    • lisa says:

      Really.. she has not worked on camera in about 2 years.

      You have serious issues. One would think Angie did something personal to you. WOW

    • Janet says:

      Hey Olivia, weren’t you the one who said nobody wanted to work with Angie in films and she couldn’t get anyone to do “Maleficient” with her?

      How does it feel to be wrong all the time?
      😆

    • Sal says:

      Like how a certain ‘ex’ of Brads put career before her wedding vows to him? Brad and Angelina make sure they are together no matter who is working where which is a darn sight more than his ex ever did, who only married him to get into Hollywood.

  18. Jackie says:

    kudos to him if he can ever get her down the aisle.

  19. Hautie says:

    I have always felt that Angelina was not looking to be legally married again.

    Had she really wanted a legal marriage, she would have done it years ago.

    By not getting married (to Brad) she keeps better control of her own finance’s and her children.

    There is no worries with pre-nup’s and the chance of an unfortunate divorce. Then having to fight over property, cash and children.

    And didn’t she adopted the 3 children alone? (Z, Maddox and Pax)

    As in Brad is not listed as a legal parent.

    She had their surnames all legally done to match (Jolie-Pitt). But she never let Brad legally adopted any of them.

    • lisa says:

      What in the world are you talking about. Brad has adopted all 3 of the children.

      seriously you need to check facts. Angie and Brad have both said they have all the legal things in order regarding their children. Gosh why is it so important for people like you to believe that Brad is not the legal father of the adopted children.

      • bettyrose says:

        Well, in either case, adoption is much more legally binding agreement (as well as emotionally) than marriage. I think it would be hard to challenge that these two are committed to proving a strong family unit for the children.

      • pwal says:

        People want to believe it because it gives them one last thing to criticize the JPs about… nevermind that the lack of coverage could be indicative the media bias towards their adoptions.

      • bettyrose says:

        It’s too late for me to edit my post, but I meant to say “providing” (not “proving”) a strong family unit.

    • Rena says:

      Say what? What have you been smoking today? What fantasy world do you live in?

      Brad is the legal father of Maddox, Zahara,and Pax, just as Angelina is their legal mother.

      Truth is out there you know. Facts are facts. Reality is what it is.

    • Sal says:

      AJ adopted the kids as a sole parent in the country she got them from, but as soon as she re-entered America, Brad legally adopted them too. This is common knowledge. Where have you been?

  20. Janet says:

    Count on this: when it happens it will be very quiet and nothing will be announced until after the fact.

    • Rhea says:

      I agree with you. They are doing it their way not following what others want/think they have to do.

      They got engaged when they feel like it, not when others said that they supposed to do it (example after they adopted Zahara or got pregnant with Shiloh. Remember how everybody speculated the wedding bells for weeks??). So naturally they would do the wedding their way, too.

      I have a hunch they would get married suddenly, too. When they feel like the time is right. Some people, including me, is like that.

    • MW says:

      Seriously – and maybe they just feel “if it ain’t broke, it don ‘t fix it”. He got her a beautiful ring to make the kids happy, supposedly. They could get married anywhere in the world in 5 minutes if they wanted, and probably will, quietly one day. They do not care about anything that is printed, if you ask me. I can guarantee you though, if they got married, all we will be seeing, weekly, ad infinitum, is “DIVORCE SHOCKER” in the tabs’ headlines!

    • Rena says:

      Totally agree with you. No public announcement will be made beforehand. Just as no announcement was made of the engagement until Angelina was seen wearing that huge ring and questions then were asked and answered.

      • NM6804 says:

        No announcement? The Jolie-Pitts only let you see what they want you to see and when they want you to see. If you break down the reveal of the ring it shows that it was all PR so premeditated.

        She was just “seen” with the ring: There was nothing to promote yet when they went to a “private viewing” with their son, pictures where taken by an agency up close and approved to be distributed for the public. Her hand was placed in a way the ring was obvious to be seen. So Jolie-Pitt did not hide the engagement and wanted the public to know. Why else would you allow pictures to be taken when you spent some time with your partner and child?

        Then, even though the press did not exactly explode of curiousity, the jeweler comes out with a long statement about Pitt designing it. A simple “yes, it’s an engagement ring” would have sufficed but as usual, they provide every detail and invited the public into a private matter. No doubt in agreement with the Jolie-Pitts.

        Then as if we didn’t know it by then, even Pitt’s team releases a statement but calls it a “promise” instead of engagement. Jolie-Pitt are never spontaneous. As for private: only when it suits them but certainly not all the time like say Meryl Streep, Julianne Moore.

      • Janet says:

        @NM: You just proved my point. No announcement was made about the engagement until after Jolie was seen with the ring in public. No announcement about “we’re getting engaged”. The announcement was after the fact.

        A wedding announcement will almost certainly be handled the same way. I’m betting nobody will know zip until it comes out on the cover of People magazine.

      • NM6804 says:

        Well, agree to disagree then. When you go out in public for no reason whatsoever and get your picture taken at close range with an engagement ring, you’re pretty much announcing it without words. It was meant to talk about. All that outing needed was a confirmation.

        They didn’t need the pictures and if they wanted to keep it private or hide it, she wouldn’t have worn it, showed it off or get photographed. If they were engaged since December, why bother making a show about it in April? And how quiet will the wedding be if we already knew every detail from the engagement after a couple of days? Is it still quiet, authentic, intimate and private when they spill the beans afterwards?

      • G says:

        Really MN, you know every detail of their engagement? A woman can’t even wear her own engagement ring? She can’t go out for “no reason”? Do you know how crazy that sounds?

        BTW, there is a vast difference between private and secret. Look it up.

      • NM6804 says:

        Oh calm down G. I’m only writing what they put out and you can’t deny that they did give away a lot of details.

        She didn’t wear her engagement ring for MONTHS yet decide to turn it into a public matter in April quite obviously? Really, letting an agency take your picture in close-up inside during a “PRIVATE” viewing?

        Yes of course people can go out for “no reason” but you don’t have to include paparazzi or photo agencies when doing it, that comes close to Kardashian territory. For people so private as some apologists like to claim, it’s a weak defense that it should be considered normal/private to be photographed when doing nothing special. If she just wants to hang out with her family then why allow people to take your picture? Because they had something to promote: an engagement.

        I never said she couldn’t wear her ring, never. I just pointed out that they certainly did not want to have kept it private or secret. They are all about timing and selling and garner good publicity. Too bad it backfired this time.

        Private:

        – pertaining to or affecting a particular person or a small group of persons; individual; personal

        – confined to or intended only for the persons immediately concerned; confidential

        – personal and not publicly expressed

        Secret:

        – done, made, or conducted without the knowledge of others

        – kept from the knowledge of any but the initiated or privileged

        – faithful or cautious in keeping confidential matters confidential; close-mouthed; reticent.

        – designed or working to escape notice, knowledge, or observation

        – secluded, sheltered, or withdrawn

        The Jolie-Pitts are neither when it comes to maintaining their image and wanting attention.

      • G says:

        Actually, you have no idea when Jolie did or didn’t wear her engagement ring over the course of their engagement. You have no idea how many times she wore it. You only know that she was photographed wearing it on this particular occasion.

        The Jolie-Pitts are movie stars and as such, like other movie stars and celebrities are routinely photographed doing nothing in particular and it is indeed, in that circle, quite normal.

        Just as they have no reason to promote their engagement, there is also no reason for them to conceal it. Equating being photographed with her own jewelry on to excessive self-promotion in essay long posts and limiting their jeweler to one word answers to any questions seems indeed a bit crazy.

      • NM6804 says:

        Yes, what I meant was: since their Christmas engagement she didn’t wear the ring in PUBLIC. So the first time she did wear it, they turned it into a photo-op with Pitt confirming it on a Friday so that the tabloids could pick it up for their covers. We know she wore on that particular occasion because it was planned to debut then.

        Well, considering you don’t see them for long periods of time, it’s not that easy to conclude that they only allow themselves to be seen in public when they want to. Since the Oscars, they are barely out and about and I don’t think they lock themselves up when they got nothing to promote. They have the ability to appear and dissapear whenever THEY decide so for them to choose to come out and play is like I said: planned. That is the privilige of being a film star. Whether it’s normal for A-listers to be so desperate for positive PR when they have nothing to promote is another debate and why they felt the need to do it while having one of their children with them baffles me too.

        The jeweler wasn’t asked anything, he GAVE an exclusive statement/confirmation to the Hollywood Reporter. Otherwise THR would have written that they tried to contact him but they didn’t. People didn’t even know Procop designed the ring together with Pitt.

  21. lucy2 says:

    Another few inches, and Brad and I will have just about the same haircut. Hmm.

  22. Rice says:

    I was actually paying attention to Salt until the Jolie removed her panties and covered the surveillance camera. After that, all I could think about was how gross it was that she wasn’t wearing any underwear for the majority of the movie. In fact, I don’t even remember how it ended.

    • islandgirl says:

      Seriously! You need help lol

    • ataylor says:

      LMFAO. I totally forgot about that. I was somewhat perturbed by that too when I first watched the movie but then I reasoned/assumed she eventually bought a pair or two — like when she bought the hair dye — maybe they sold those generic white panties in the plastic bag and the audience just didn’t SEE her buying them?

    • Freya says:

      She put panties on when she was in the little girl’s house (the little girl she gave her dog to).

  23. samira677 says:

    I don’t know how these stories get published and even worse why people believe them. Angelina is only doing one movie. Other projects she’s attached to like Salt 2 don’t even have scripts. So it’s ridiculous to claim she’s doing 3 movies this summer/fall. I guess tabloids and blogs write for the haters. They really don’t care about facts and logic.

    For people who supposedly love publicity they sure stay out of the spotlight when they don’t on set or promoting. So many celebrities are photographed everyday and attend every premier and party. Yet Brad and Angelina are famewhores? I don’t get it.

    • Rhea says:

      I don’t get it either. People would say that the Jolie-Pitt should stop appearing going out and about, “selling” their family.

      So when they are laying low but the tabloids decided to still making money by making up stories about them, people would still jumping on them too. I don’t remember they ever say anything about the wedding date or that they already deciding on a summer wedding.

      So when Brad said no summer wedding, people still saying they are the attention seeker??!! Gezzzz….

    • Rena says:

      This particular total LIE originated with that always lying never know nothing chick KN @ The Daily Mail, LOL. She and all the other gossips jumped on some August wedding nonsense. Brad said at Cannes that an August wedding was tabloid stuff he and Angelina never pay attention to, and then to one reporter that “not August but soon”.

      Angelina is making ONE film this year, Maleficent has a long shoot scheduled like Brad’s WWZ last year. She has signed on to NO other films.

      They wil get married when they want to like everyone else does, and it will be made public after the fact.

      As an aside to the few who keep seeking in vain to stick the fameW label on them, fameW’s seek fame and are pictured all the time out and about courting paps and constant attention, the very opposite of the behavior of Brad, Angelina and their kids.

    • Freya says:

      Me four!

  24. lmfao says:

    Ummmmm…. Wow. We can clearly see who’s still wearing the pants in this relationship… Jeez, talk about having him by his short and curlies! But I guess he prefers his bitches like that… Brad should get big papa Voight to loosen Angelina’s vice grip on his balls!!!

    • lower-case deb says:

      this can only be true if AJ actually gives a flying care of what her father says; and not just threaten to excommunicate him again.

      then again, JV has been in the acting career longer than she’s been alive, so maybe he’ll just use his acting chops to get his future son-in-law-to-be what he wants.

      plus, we can’t discount the power of the Super Six, and also Pitt Srs.

      of course, all of the above are only applicable if we believe the tabs as gospel. however, i have the sneaking feeling that tabs are just bagsful of wind.

  25. Heidi says:

    Poor guy took on too much and aged rapidly. Angelina is scary skinny and unhealthy.

    • Josephina says:

      Too Soon? The man is almost 50 years old!

      It should be clear to all by now…even Stevie Wonder AND Ray Charles…that Brad has no regrets with his expedient choice to start and raise a large family with Angie.

      He has a very rewarding and awarding career…huge worldwide fanbase…adorable, loving family…various successful humanitarian projects and foundations…he is about to marry the love of his life and mother of his six gorgeous children…

      But let’s scrap all of that– he should ditch the fam and go hang out, get high and maybe tan in Mexico instead.

  26. Linda says:

    Brad doesn’t give a shiz about looks. He is not as shallow as his ex. He been there done that. This is Brad pre Angie. I guess he looks hotter here because he was with Aniston.

    http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-6UQn2mmyK5s/T0ee0m-6SdI/AAAAAAAAHhI/zM64EV2Afq8/s400/Brad-Pitt-Beard1.jpg

    http://www.busybeeblogger.com/wp-content/uploads/Brad-Pitt-2002-Beard.jpg

  27. NM6804 says:

    Isn’t Pitt the busy one of the two? He actually was confirmed for all the parts he was going to play in two serious projects. The Counselor, just like Maleficent is shot during the summer so I’m sure they both were too busy to get hitched.

    Jolie only has Maleficent for sure. Salt 2 is still uncertain so I don’t think it’s Jolie who doesn’t want to put work on hold. For all the talk about how many roles she can snatch (Gertrude Bell, The counselor, Gucci, Atlas Shrugged, Scarpetta, Catwoman…out of the top of my head) how much did she actually work in the past years? Rumours and facts are something else in her case. So what back to back projects? She’s hardly worked in the last four years now.

    Besides, Pitt himself said at Cannes that they didn’t have a date.

    “We actually, really and truly, have no date … It’s just something that makes sense to us, and certainly date-wise, it’s just a rumor … We’re still hoping that we can figure out marriage equality in the states before that date.”

    Ring designing for a year, a proposal in December (supposedly) and announcing it months later generated not that much press coverage or interest and now we basically have Pitt saying that there are NO plans for a wedding. And then people still think these two aren’t pulling our (right)Leg =).

  28. valleymiss says:

    1) Wait, the script for the first Salt movie sucked? I liked that movie!

    2) I bet they’re still marrying this summer. Brad is trying to throw the media off the scent by saying there’s no date, it’s not gonna happen for a long time, etc. Their reasoning for getting engaged (or at least, what they’ve floated to the public) is that the kids have been begging for it. You mean to tell me that now that AJ has an engagement ring, the kids have finally shut up? Doubtful. It’s gonna happen by September, people. That’s my prediction.

  29. Wilma Flintstone says:

    I think she’s ridiculously good looking, and her constant default choice of nude/taupe shoes pisses me off.

  30. Floridaseaturtle says:

    …Brad Pitt cries about it… I love that

  31. sup says:

    i can see her being an autumn or winter bride, or a hushed up quick wedding bride. she has a penchant for doing things differently and ‘edgier’~ plus she was married twice before, and she can’t risk ore negative press after leg-gate -snort-

    • Rena says:

      HaHaHa. The only leg gate was generated by gossips. Cannes had many trying to emulate Angelina’s pose. Angelina is a style setter without even trying or caring to try.

      Brad looks great for a 48 year old man who will be 50 in December. He is aging naturally with wrinkles to be seen in his face. Glad to see someone in celeb town to be doing so.

      • Jackie says:

        the ‘leg pose’ gave it away…she really does care and really does try.

      • sup says:

        @Rena people who follow trends are not exactly the brightest bulbs themselves. if angelina did something much worse they would have emulated it too.

        @jackie yeah i thought the leg thing was silly, and kinda unclassy too because the whole point to a high-slit skirt is the peek-a-boo effect, not sticking your leg out half a metre away from your body so that everybody can get a clear view of it. that said, i know i’m not the only one in admitting that i much rather prefer the angelina that does care and does try. it makes her more human and more real. i dislike it when celebrities are presented in a superhuman fashion, or a holier than thou and above it all demeanor like angelina was pre-leggate. she actually wanted to have fun and was probably intoxicated too but i prefer that angie to the cold patron saint of baggy mom dresses any day.

      • Freya says:

        Rena, you forgot 49!

  32. Janet says:

    How do you cancel plans that were never made? The only “plans” for their marriage this summer were hatched in the fevered imaginations of the editors of ITW.

  33. Tara says:

    yawn…..

  34. Truth says:

    It’s a fake engagament. Brad is promoting himself and his movie, and Angelina is promoting her jewelry line.

    • Ducky La Rue says:

      Okay, I’ll bite. What makes it “fake”? Is it because they aren’t married yet? Is it because you have insider information that they are actually not going to get married? Or is it fake because – gasp – the ring is really a cubic zirconia (TM Angie’s Discount Bling)?

      Hey, I’m partial to fake diamonds myself – much easier on the wallet. 😉

    • Katherine says:

      Truth? LOL! Delusion is more like it?

  35. Rena says:

    Well untruth, this may be the silliest written today by far. LOL LOL LOL

    People promoting something are seen promoting it right? Brad was seen for the only time in weeks @ the Cannes film festival like what 5 days ago with other actors and directors and producers of films at the festival (work you know), and Angelina has not been seen for weeks.

    Truth is they are not out in the public promoting anything, and seemed to have found a private place for the most part to live in the UK while Angelina films Maleficent.

    So tell me how are they promoting anything if they are not seen promoting something?

    Common Sense and Truth hurts does it not when one is totally unrealistic LOL

  36. ChronLogic says:

    “Autumn bride” reminded me of a line from Gia: “More like nuclear f’ing winter.”

  37. JoeBanana says:

    He reminds me of Benicio Del Toro…

  38. KLO says:

    I love this story.
    Classic enquirer material.

  39. redroses says:

    Looking forward to Salt 2!! Salt was one of my favorite movies. And she put off the wedding plans!! they should get married already..

  40. KellyinSeattle says:

    I think Angelina looks gorgeous; Brad, not so much.

  41. amy says:

    I think Brad kinda looks like William H. Macy in Shameless. He looks better with short locks. But I wouldn’t kick him out of my bed the way he looks now…. LOL. Personally I would become a lesbian for Angie. She is such a beautiful person to look at.

    • lisa good says:

      Who the heck cares anymore they make billions, travel the world,live in lavish mansions,secretly do drugs and play in their adult dungeon, they are going to be just fine.now I have to go to bed so I can go to my 13.00 an hour job and pay all my bills by myself.

  42. Katherine says:

    The judge signed the dissolution papers August 9, 2005. The papers were filed with the Clerk of the Court August 19, 2005. I suppose you can make an argument for either date as the formal end of the marriage absent caselaw. The dissolution papers restored both parties to Single status meaning that there could be no charge of “adultery” or no more shared assets after the dissolution date. The dissolution papers also restored Jennifer’s maiden name as of the date of the dissolution.

    The October date is the date which the parties could enter into new marriages. The marriage was formally dissolved ahead of the October date for all purposes other than remarriage.

    Please learn to differentiate the meaning of the different dates. The differences have legal significance.

    Shiloh was not the result of adultery. Give it a rest.