'08
Nicole Kidman and husband Keith Urban brought five month old daughter Sunday Rose out for one of her first appearances. The family is in Paris promoting the release of Kidman’s latest film “Australia.” In the past they’ve been very private about Sunday and haven’t released official pictures – though Nicole did flash a photo to Oprah.
However little Sunday got some primo paparazzi exposure today, as Nicole and Keith took her all around Paris.
Nicole Kidman and Keith Urban embarked on a tour of Paris today, with little Sunday Rose in tow.
Giving their five-month-old daughter one of her first public appearances, the family took a walk around the French capital, taking in the Picasso exhibition at the Grand Palais.
The actress gave the world its first look at her baby last month during the Oprah Winfrey show, flashing an intimate picture to the audience.
Describing her daughter, she told the host that Sunday looks ’so much like Keith’, that she has actually taken to calling her ‘Keith-ette’.
The family are currently in the city to contine Kidman’s whirlwind world tour to promote new movie, Australia. She last night attended the French premiere of the film, following events in New York and Sydney.
[From British Marie Claire]
The Gossip Girls pointed out that while Nicole has gotten some good reviews from the critics for her performance in “Australia,” she’s definitely not appealing to the Facebook demographic, where multiple groups have been created denouncing her performance. A few of the titles are, “Am I Taking Crazy Pills or is Nicole Kidman the Worst Actress in the World,” “So Over Nicole Kidman,” and “No Wonder Tom Cruise is Crazy and Keith Drinks.” Though something tells me that’s the last thing on her mind right now.
Here’s Nicole, Keith, and Sunday Rose out and about in Paris today. Images thanks to Bauer-Griffin.
Written by JayBird
Posted in Babies, Keith Urban, Nicole Kidman, Photos
- Heidi Klum topless in Allure [Celebslam]
- Robert Pattinson's tousled look is expertly styled [D-Listed]
- Britney is back to white tank tops with no bra [Lainey Gossip]
- This cracks me up: Dog Chapman on the accuracy of Bounty Hunter[Popeater]
- How the hell did Rebecca Gayheart lose all her baby weight in 2 weeks?! [Celebrity Baby Scoop]
- Is Chris Rock adopting an African child? [Bossip]
- More photos of Johnny Depp on set [Popsugar]
28 Responses to “Nicole Kidman and Keith Urban take baby Sunday out in Paris”
-
and what is up with these celebs not dressing their children warmly enough? that child needs a hat!
-
Keith’s hair sucks.
-
I agree JayBird.
I bet she doesn’t give a rat’s ass what the ‘Facebook crowd’ thinks about her. -
I love Nicole but I think she should have a bob with warm shades in it. The hair colour is too cold and blends in with her pale skin with no definition between the two. A layered bob with warmer blonde and red in it would look cute!
-
Yes, Codzilla, Keith’s hair is about as bad as Billy Ray Cyrus’ hair.
-
her Moulin Rouge look was the best
-
The baby weighed more.
-
one of the things that really bother me about nicole and tom is the blatant non-recognition of their adopted children on both their parts… not the couch jumping, the scientology, the cold countenance… but the fact that they seem to have both unanimously forgotten their adopted kids… that’s REALLY weird…
-
she is pregnant again, i just heard on the news….lol
just kidding!
-
Keith is such a mess. His jeans are ill fitting; his boots are filthy (and have been resoled), and he definitely needs a new ‘hairdresser.’ He looks just plain dirty. His appeal to Nicole eludes me utterly.
-
The ‘Hollywood Types’ always tend to be in favour with USA crowds…they do not appreciate nor understand personal or professional dignity. Unfortunately, those like Britany Spears, who greet the press photographers with shots of her hairless vay-jay rule…
-
definately definately trying for another baby by the look of that grey hair
I’ve been saying she was grey for years but of course no-one believed me
-
I don’t understand the rancor against Nicole. She is beautiful and classy and a wonderful actress. Maybe I will understand better after seeing Australia, but I doubt it. Her husband is handsome and casual. It is obvious from the way that Nicole holds her baby that she considers her precious. What do people gain by trying to tear these two apart? A sense of superiority? I’m sorry, but who on earth cares that Keith’s shoes have been resoled. My God, president-elect Obama campaigned wearing shoes with holes in them. So what?
-
I want to take a proper look at Sunday. From most pictures she takes after Keith.
-
Nicole, a baby head represents one fifth of it’s surface, so please, please cover it even if the hat has been lost or you go out for just one minute. Babies aren’t able to regulate theree inner temperature.
Apart from that, they look greaaat -
God she looks like she’s 60
-
Meow. She hardly looks 60. Give her a break. I saw Australia and thought she was fabulous and I admit my expectations were low: funny, convincing, showed range, etc. But honestly the movie belongs to the young actor who played “Nullah.” I can’t understand why the critics aren’t talking about him. Amazing.
-
Is it just me or does Sunday Roast look like neither Keith or Nicole?
Nicole really needs to stop doing that sh-t to her lips. It’s freaking me out.
-
Whatever do you mean, kaiser? Are we back in pillow territory?
-
G, ZOMG BOTOX BABY. I don’t know, but The Fraud is strong with this one.
-
Whoever pointed out that these celebs trot out the tots when its publicity time was right on! That baby in the summer was covered head to toe, now she’s all exposed? Paris in December the temps are in the low 50’s.
WTF?
She can’t buy herself a hit movie unless she goes the comic book route. -
Nicole looks beyond awkward holding her baby. It’s like she doesn’t have much experience holding her. I guessing the nanny holds that baby more than Nicole ever will.
When Sunday was a few months old there were pictures of Nicole carrying her in a sling, she wore the sling is a way that would have been incredibly uncomfortable for both of them. The baby was hanging so low she would have bumped against Nicole’s hip with every step.
Taking baby out = photo op for mom.
-
Everything about her is a lie.
-
Ah the baby she paid another woman to have for her.
-
she looks ghastly. so pale, so skinny, so frozen…
-
OK, I kinda like Nicole but, OMG, I think she botoxed the baby! Helps the photogs get good shots when they ain’t moving so much!
And, if you pull your hair back tight enough, TADA!
Instant face lift! -
Nicole does look ultra thin and in these pictures is it just me or does she seem quite a bit taller than Keith?
In these recent Nicole Kidman pictures you can tell that there may be a few inches difference, but they are nowhere near as obvious as the ones in the shots above.
Leave a Reply
Celebitchy aims to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.By commenting you agree to our comment policy
Use the "Report this comment as spam or abuse" link to ask the moderators to delete a comment if it's offensive. If your comment disappears, it has been eaten by the spam filter. Please e-mail cbcomments at gmail.com to get it retrieved.
Get an icon next to your name by signing up for a free Gravatar
I don’t know… methinks is mighty strange we see pics of Sunday NOW that Nicole has a movie out that’s not doing so well….
Report this comment as spam or abuse