Kim Kardashian isn’t “real” enough for a post-baby weight loss endorsement

I’ve noticed something weird about Kim Kardashian post-pregnancy announcement. The paparazzi seem to be going out of their way to respectfully shoot her from the front. Which is sad, because I really want to see that pregnant ass. Is that mean? I didn’t mean it in a mean way. I just want to see if her ass gets crazy big, or if it stays the same size. I think Kim is worried about it too – she’s been pap’d going into the gym A LOT lately. Anyway, it seems that other people are thinking about the size of Kim’s ass, and how it will probably expand. TMZ spoke to reps at Jenny Craig and Medifast to see if Kim would be in the running for a post-baby weight loss endorsement deal. Long story short, no one wants to deal with that ass.

Two major weight loss companies won’t touch Kim Kardashian’s “big fat ass” with a 10-foot pole … TMZ has learned they have zero interest in signing the pregnant celeb to a Jessica Simpson type deal.

Reps for Jenny Craig and Medifast tell TMZ they won’t be be helping Kim K shed her post-baby weight — and their reason, ironically enough, is the reality TV star isn’t real enough.

Medifast said its not looking for any celeb endorsements — but Jenny Craig was more specific, telling us they’re … focusing on “real results for real women” this year.

Interestingly, JC’s rep added, “We will continue our working relationship with Mariah Carey.”

Of course we don’t know if Kim’s even looking for a new weight loss deal … she endorsed Quick Trim last year.

But who knew? Mariah’s ass: way realer than Kim’s.

[From TMZ]

I wonder if anyone has spoken to Weight Watchers? I imagine all of the WW people are still on suicide watch after the Jessica Simpson debacle – and I still say that people probably got fired over that at WW. No, my guess is that Kim will probably stick with her QuickTrim endorsement after she gives birth – she’s been associated with those weight loss pills for years, hasn’t she?

In other Kim K. news, Radar reports that Kim is telling friends that Kris Humphries is “ruining her life.”

Pregnant reality TV star Kim Kardashian is venting to close friends that her estranged husband, Kris Humphries, is ruining her life because he is “hell bent on dragging her name through the mud by prolonging the divorce proceedings” and claims if not for the delay, she’d already be married to her baby daddy, Kanye West, by now, is exclusively reporting.

“Kim is seeing red because she is still legally married to Kris Humphries. Kim is overjoyed at the news that she is pregnant with Kanye’s baby, but she isn’t able to fully embrace it because of Kris. Kim feels that Kris is hell bent on dragging her name through the mud by prolonging the divorce proceedings,” a source close to the situation tells exclusively.

“Kim knows that she most likely will still be married to Kris when she gives birth to Kanye’s baby, and that absolutely sickens her. Kim has been pressuring her attorney, Laura Wasser, to get Humphries to sign off on the divorce, to no avail. Kris is holding the position that if Kim grants him an annulment on the grounds that the marriage was a sham, this whole thing ends. However, Kim won’t give in to his demands because it would damage her brand,” the insider added.

On Friday, February 15 – the day after Valentine’s Day – Kim and Kris’ divorce lawyers will be in court setting a date for the trial. The earliest the trial can be scheduled would be the middle of June to accommodate Kris’ basketball schedule. His team the Nets is now in second place in its division, and the play-offs don’t end until June. Kim, who’s 12 weeks pregnant, is due at the end of June.

[From Radar]

Wait, what? “Kris is holding the position that if Kim grants him an annulment on the grounds that the marriage was a sham, this whole thing ends. However, Kim won’t give in to his demands because it would damage her brand.” It was my understanding of the situation that Kim wouldn’t give into an annulment because that would effectively end the terms of Kim’s pre-nup, and Kris would be able to get more money from her and from the Kardashian-Jenner family. I keep hearing that the hold-up is still about money, not Kim’s “brand”. I think she would sell out her brand if it meant she got to hold on to $5-10 million, but Kris is going after her money.

Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

129 Responses to “Kim Kardashian isn’t “real” enough for a post-baby weight loss endorsement”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. SW says:

    They are both douchy, but kris needs to get over this already, he’s a probasketball player, like he’s hurting for money??

  2. Migdalia says:

    Yes he is which is annoying when people assume she’s just holding onto her pride…he was paid for that whole wedding debacle with E! and for appearing on her show and his public status shot way up. Not to be a hardcore Kardashian defender cause they annoy me, but he more likely damaged his own brand by his holding out and with that temp gf he had then by them actually breaking up.

    • EarthWindFire82 says:

      I am not a fan of Kim’s by far, but I do think Kris is being a tad unnecessary in this divorce. Just break loose and go on with your life, so I say. Besides, only hardcore NBA fans knew who he was before he got with Kim and even his sister benefitted from the exposure (by way of modeling contracts).

      He can’t be THAT naive to not know who she was, what she was known for and what she was about. He gave control to her and E! now he wants to say she was a fraud. She didn’t do EVERYTHING under his nose…

      • Loulou says:

        Not like sleeping with Kanye under his nose? Lol I think for Humphries, it’s sentimental – he wants to be the one who appears more moral but why did he date a Kardashian in the first place? They made their name over Nicole Simpson’s dead body!?! Talk about a “brand”. I’d keep a low profile if I were any of them, frankly. And hide that hideous behind.

  3. palermo says:

    If he was dumb enough to go into the marriage thinking it was real, I don’t blame him for wanting an annulment. It’s clear to all the rest of us she totally used him for the show and to get all that free stuff. Didn’t she keep the ring and all the gifts. I’m Team Kris.

    • Rachel says:

      If I remember correctly, E! paid for that ring, not Kris Humphries. So why wouldn’t she keep it. Please feel free to correct me if I’m wrong.

      But regardless, under contract law, even if he did buy the ring, she’s entitled to keep it post-divorce because she fulfilled her side of the contract by marrying him.

      Not that I’m defending her, I think they’re all horrible. Except Khloe.

  4. RN says:

    The image of a postpartum, potentially breast-feeding woman sucking down handfuls of weight loss pills isn’t going to sit well with a segment of the population.

    Oh, who am I kidding. KK is never going to breast feed.

  5. dorothy says:

    I wouldn’t think that the weight loss companies want her attached to “their” brand. I can’t imagine it would be positive publicity for them. Kim doesn’t represent a positive image for anyone.

  6. Riana says:

    Yep, some low level worker at WW decided to give Jessica the sponsorship without researching anything about her past – in fact they picked her name out of a hat. Psssh.

    Of course its about Kim’s brand, Kim’s brand, Kim’s lies, Kim’s false story, Kim being America’s Darling, Kim being the American Kate. Kim Kim Kim. Kim loved her husband, she really really did…yes, 72 days of pure unadulterated LOVE.

  7. DeltaJuliet says:

    If she’s so “sickened” by it,she shouldn’t have rushed into marrying Kris. And the fact that she’s already intentially knocked up, and saying she would already be married to KANYE shows that she has learned n.o.t.h.i.n.g from her experience. Dumbass.

  8. LAK says:

    It’s crazy that people keep saying that Kris is holding on and dragging it out etc.

    Assuming all this is true, one signature on an annullment form = free Kim.

    This could have been over 5mins after Khris filed those papers, without court, trials last october.

    Instead Kim is sticking to her woe is me tale because of money and profits. One could argue consenquences, but she thought she’d found a chump who would roll over and do as told and walk away with it all.

    Well Kim, he is a chump. Just not as much of a chump as you thought. So put on your big girl pants, stop whining, sign the papers, give him and the sponsors the money you defrauded them and get on with your life.

    You’ve got an 18yr guaranteed money maker assuming all goes well with pregnancy, plus profits from famewhoring the baby.

    • G says:

      This is right on. She wouldn’t admit the fraud becasuse it opened her up to other suits and loss of monies.

      I predict the pregnancy will give her an out to say something like “I just want to get on with my life in the best possible way for my child and family and so, I’m signing.”

      If it costs her a bit, so be it now. she’s got a hotter set of propects.

    • the original bellaluna says:

      ^^^This right here^^^ Well said.

    • Relli says:

      Agreed! I have also read on other sites that his grounds for wanting an annulment are purely because of his religion. I don’t know what sect of Christianity his is but I know in the Catholic church you cannot get married in the church or receive sacraments if you are divorced, your previous marriage must be annulled. The church does seem to play a large part in his life, remember when Kitty Killer flew to Minnesota to “save her marriage” in order to meet with the minister who married them. Because of that I believe that there may be more at stake then simply he wants her money and the ring back! An annulment does seem more fitting to this situation anyway.

      • swack says:

        @Relli – please let me clear up about annulments and the Catholic Church. First the annulment comes from the church not the state (I know, my ex wanted an annulment and I would not help with it – he must have paid big bucks for it). So that being said, if you are not married in the Catholic Church you do not need an annulment to receive sacraments or get married again. Second, I agree this was not about money. Didn’t he turn down $7 million when this first came out. He has always said it was not about the money. Kim is the one holding things up and she only has herself (and whomever is giving her advice) to blame. I think she does this because it makes for more drama and face time in the media.

      • Relli says:

        Right Swack!

        I guess my point was that he may want an annulment for religious reasons within his own church. I was using the Catholic church as an example because thats what I know, but I know Humphrey is not a Catholic but is a Christian based on his actions. Therefore, it may be important to him and his beliefs that his “first marriage” be annulled in order for him to get married again. If that is the case, then I can understand the hold out; if she is going to put his life on hold by not granting him an annulment, he can put her life on hold too. I say, well played!

    • Brookie says:

      @LAK – Totally agreed!!! Ticks me off when people say he’s dragging it out. All she has to do is sign the papers. She’s already been divorced once, and that divorce was pretty mess-free and quiet. Ohh, that was BEFORE the sex tape.

      Like someone else said, he might be a “Der”, but he ain’t that stupid. He had money before her. He was like a sport phenom in high school, and he had endorsements before college. He really doesn’t need her money; he probably needs her to admit she’s a phony to the world to gain some self-esteem back.

    • Lizzie K says:

      The prenup doesn’t come into play if there is an annulment, but neither do commmunity property laws. The whole point is that he wants a legal ruling that there was never a marriage at all. No marriage, no property settlement, no alimony, etc. The only way he could get any of her money if the marriage is annulled is under some kind of breach of contract claim relating to the marketing of the wedding, and he would have that same claim if they get divorced.

      I don’t think he is in it for the money at all. If he is, he is getting really bad legal advice.

  9. littlestar says:

    I think it’s a combination of both. Kim doesn’t want to admit what everyone already knows, that their “marriage” was a fraud AND she doesn’t want to potentially lose millions to Kris H. I also think that an annulment would allow Kris H to speak freely about the Kardashian’s, and no one the the KKK family wants that to happen.

    Oh gahd I hope the annulment goes through! I want to know what delicious sordid secrets the family has been hiding! :D

  10. Buckwild says:

    I actually believe Kim married Kris with genuine delusions of a fairy tale romance/love etc. She was desperate to get married and rushed into it without getting to know Uh, Basketball. But this doesn’t make the marriage fraudulent, many ppl make mistakes when marrying and that doesn’t mean the marriage was fraudulent to the point of illegal. I think we must all know women who marry partly for te sake of being married with delusions of romance and love etc and I wouldn’t think that means the union should be dissolved as though it never existed (which is what would occur in an annulment).

    Kris also benefited from the wedding so he needs to move on and stop pretending he wants the “truth” and that this isn’t a last minute cash grab. He started dating that KK lookalike the moment the divorce was announced, so it’s not like he can clutch his pearls here.

    • Latisha says:

      You’re kidding right? She married Kris Humphries to make Kanye jealous.Kim is a rich spoiled princess and Kris never had the kind of money that this woman wants from her man and is used to.She has been trying to seal the deal with Kanye for years and when she felt like he was leaving because of all of her divorce drama she locked it down with a pregnancy. I don’t care about Kanye either,he will see her true colors one day. I actually think these two awful people totally deserve each other.

  11. fabgrrl says:

    Hm, well, it sounds like marrying her baby’s father is less important to her than her “brand”. Otherwise, she would just sign whatever and be done with it. It’s not as if this child is ever going to be lacking anything (financial-wise), even if Kim’s “brand” is damaged.

    If you want to be a halfway decent parent, Kim, you have to be willing to sacrifice your own self interests for your child’s well-being

  12. Ali says:

    Personally based on the fact Kim is working out and probably eating healthy she will only put on 15-20 pounds during her pregnancy like Kim Zolack (sic). No need for a big weight loss like Jessica Simspon which ironically would be a great way to expand her brand. Pregnancy dvds, healthy food plans etc and all in keeping with looking good quickly after birth.

  13. Sweet Dee says:

    Honest question: do you actually get any money if a marriage is annulled? My impression was that this whole thing was indeed about not damaging the brand, per Pimp Mama.

    • cf says:

      Yeah this is right- you get NO money in an annulment, because you are saying the marriage never existed.

      • tabasco says:

        you don’t get money simply for an annullment. but if the the marriage is annulled, out goes the prenup, out goes the confi in the prenup, and here comes the lawsuits.

      • Sweet Dee says:

        That’s what I thought! There’s no money at stake because it’s as if the marriage never really happened, right? So it’s actually all about saving face, and not damaging her brand. Because why else would she not go for the annulment if—

        –what’s that? I smell something…smells something like a PimpMama…anyone else smell that? Weird.

      • MyCatLovesTV says:

        Thanks so much! I’ve been reading to find someone to say this. Who needs a pre-nup when there is NO NUP, right? I remember when Kim met Kris and she was obsessed with his “K” name. She posted a picture from his childhood and said she wanted her child to look like that. She was picking out wedding dresses almost immediately after meeting him and, I think, he was all puffed up that this beautiful heiress/reality star actually loved HIM. Marriage jackpot! But I think even before he walked down the aisle the bloom was off the rose & he realized she was not interested in him….and loved him enough to follow her man to where he needed to go for his job. Kris may be immature or a boob but I think he got sucked into the vortex that is Kardashian World. And all she has to do is admit to the terms of an annulment and it is all over. They can both go on like it never happened (they both have short term memory issues). Her “brand”? Give me an effing break! If getting peed on in a raunchy sex tape & getting paid every time it sells didn’t hurt her “brand,” WTF would? She’s hurting her brand.

        And I apologize to my brain that I know all this stuff about Kim. I think I learned it right here and that’s OK, right????

      • Sweet Dee says:


        is all there is to it. Seems pretty cut-and-dry to me.

  14. assistantrachel says:

    If she wants the marriage over so badly, why not give him what he wants? We all know the marriage was a sham, her denials don’t change that.

  15. the original bellaluna says:

    Maybe they mean “parts of her aren’t ‘real’ enough…”

  16. OXA says:

    Kim said Kris Hump is ruining her life.
    Lmao cos if she wanted it then the marriage could end. She is greedy and loving all the attention it brings her.

  17. Cecada says:

    I’m not a fan of this person and I have never watched the show but I was reading this article out of boredom and I have a (hopefully not-too-dumb) question.

    Um… Her butt is “fake” – ?

    I know I’m an old fart and all but this one is new to me. You can get a “fake butt” now? I clinch my bum-cheeks just THINKING about plastic surgery back there…

  18. cf says:

    and Kris would be able to get more money from her and from the Kardashian-Jenner family.

    Annulled means the marriage never happened. So he would get NO money in an annullment. He would only get money in a divorce. He is not going for her money.

    He may very well think he can get more money on his own by doing a tell all, which he would be able to do if the prenup is cancelled by the anullment.

  19. HouseOfBeatrix says:

    Ok. So she’s refusing to get the annulment not because saying the marraige was a sham is a lie, but because saying so is damaging to her brand.

    Sounds like an admission of guilt to me.

  20. RobN says:

    I’m kind of loving the fact that idiot Kris has managed to gain the upper hand in this debacle.

    • MyCatLovesTV says:

      Me, too! Call me a jealous witch but I just love it when people who always get their way (the “don’t you know who I am” crowd) DON’T get their way. Maybe it is his religious belief system and, if so, he’s got every right to dig his heels in and she’s a monster to not allow him to have the ability to move forward without a divorce. But maybe he was humiliated in public (and in private) and wants a little of his own back. Good for him.

  21. Katie says:

    Charles Barkley was overheard on television calling his Weight Watchers endorsement deal a “scam” and the easiest money he’s ever made and he’s still their spokeman, but a woman getting pregnant while on their plan is a “debacle” that probably led to people’s firing. Uh huh.

    As for Kim K., I wish we could all forget about her. Her pregnancy is probably the most nauseating piece of gossip I’ve heard in a longtime.

    • cf says:

      umm he wasn’t overheard he said it- and he said it as a huge compliment to weight watchers. he said it was a scam that he gets to get paid to lose weight, because the program is so easy.

      • Riana says:

        If I remember correctly the ‘scam’ part was what was said on the microphone he assumed was off. The ‘scam because its so easy to stick to the program’ part came out in a later statement to explain why he called it a scam.

        The majority of the women who do these programs don’t maintain that weight, but Jessica…yeah she’s driven someone to suicide. Even now the WW people are gulping down vodka and whimpering about ever knowing her. Please.

      • Katie says:

        Yes, he was “overheard” saying it when he thought the mic was off. I don’t know how they later spun it, but he wasn’t giving them a huge compliment at the time.

  22. Guest says:

    I do get by by pretending that Kim and Kayne do not exist. I will do my darnest to continue while they behave like they are the first couple to become pregnant.

    • Riana says:

      I do understand why people are emotionally invested, it is a child and NO child deserves to be brought into that mess, but its not like this relationship will last. Its just waiting to see how long.

      It was 72 days of waiting with her last relationship, its just ticking down the days with this one.

  23. Maggs says:

    Blind Item Reveal at CDAN:

    Thursday, January 03, 2013
    Blind Items Revealed

    November 21, 2012

    This stage mom thinks a baby will make for great ratings and a bunch of money so she has her daughter’s ovulation cycle in an app and calls her and texts when its go time. Not sure, but she would probably even go and watch if she thought she could get away with it.

    Kim Kardashian/Kris Jenner

    Posted by ent lawyer at 8:30 AM 24 comments

  24. Asdfg says:

    “Kim won’t give in to his demands because it would damage her brand,” the insider added”!?!?!?!

    Good God, who cares if it’ll damage your “brand”?

    She obviously doesn’t want the divorce too bad.. :P

  25. Tpoe says:

    Maybe its because I’m a life long NBA basketball fan, but I think everyone needs to lay off of Humphries

    I totally believe that Kim and her Klan just don’t want to admit that her “wedding” was a huge fraud designed to earn money. There is absolutely nothing in that family’s history that would lead me to believe the opposite.

    As for Humphries, I think he’s genuinely hurt, or at least angry, at being used in such a manner and genuinely wants to get her to admit that the marriage was a sham on principal.

    All this stuff about how he’s a douche who’s after her money? I don’t believe a word of it. Its just misinformation put out by the Kardashians if you ask me. Consider that Humphries is known as a good teammate and citizen who genuinely goes about his job as a professional basketball player with maximum effort and minimal fanfare. Consider also that the man is currently in the first year of a two year 24 million dollar contract that he earned through hard work rather than famewhoring. Consider also that he earned 8 million dollars playing basketball in 2011. This guy does need the Kardashian’s money. PERIOD.

    He’s a well respected and hardworking teammate and professional who has earned and will continue to earn millions at his chosen profession. She’s a lying, fake crying, honeymoon editing, famewhore.

    If anyone can find a fault in my logic, I’m dying to hear it.

  26. Madriani's Girl says:

    Wait a second. She faked a “real” marriage, she got peed on in a sex video, she is pregnant by a man who isn’t her husband, she rode a camel in high heels (her, not the camel), and her mother is Kris Jenner. She’s a frigging Kardashian, FFS! And she’s worried it will damage her brand if she admits to something everyone already knows??? Is she kidding???

  27. dorothy says:

    A thought. What happens if she realizes this baby doesn’t increase her brands profitability? That all this baby did is make people realize what a cheap, skanky person she is for getting knocked up while married to someone else.

    • RN says:

      But to whom does she appeal in the first place? Who is her target market? It’s not as if she promotes herself to an intelligent, educated segment of the population. Chances are, whoever is watching her show/buying her merchandise are people who are a little loosey goosey with the axiom, “first comes love, then comes marriage, then comes baby in a baby carriage”.

  28. tabasco says:

    if the hump stands his ground, i think we may be seeing a cruise-holmes move. the ass’s lawyers meet with the hump’s lawyers, hump gets a payout, marriage is ended, everybody signs a konfidentiality agreement, the ass makes a statement saying she’s just glad it’s over so she can move on but won’t/can’t discuss the details b/c it’s a “private matter.” you know, b/c she’s so private.

  29. tabasco says:

    wasn’t there some sort of legal drama surrounding those diet pills she shills? she wont get a weight loss deal with a reputable place b/c she’s already associated with that shady-ness and b/c she’s too easy a target for calling bullsh*t on “i followed a sensible eating plan and exercised” versus “i called my plastic surgeon, he’s on speed dial.”

  30. Elceibeno says:

    “Drag her name through the mud!!!!!!!!!”
    How can something that’s already filthy possibly get more dirty.

  31. EmmaStoneWannabe says:

    The only reason they are not divorced yet is because of all the greed going around. GREED GREED GREED GREEDYYYYYY people! All of them. How about walk away with what you had before the 72 days (hah!) and split all the shared profits right down the middle and call it a day? Oh yeah, greed.

  32. dorothy says:

    For a while this family was fun fodder for gossip. With this latest development, they have gone beyond human decency. They pushed the envelope to a sickening level. I can’t even imagine why her sisters would want to be attached to this spectacle in any way. Any other family behavior. Am I the only one that feels this way??

  33. TheEntrepreneursWife says:

    Anyone else see an implicit admission that the marriage was fake by the statement that she won’t give in to his demands because it would “damage her brand”?

    Not because she wants to defend the truth that she really loved him but they just weren’t meant to be married? — which would be a better position for her “brand.”

    Maybe I am looking too much into this, but I see an interesting and probably unintended shift in position here.

  34. nikzilla37 says:

    Good for Kris. I’m liking him more and more everyday. And for you, Kanye: you KNOW you can’t make a ho a housewife.

  35. lucy2 says:

    Kris is ruining her life? Aw, poor baby. Perhaps she shouldn’t have married him for money/attention/ratings and then intentionally got pregnant by another man before they were divorced. Her problems are her own doing, I feel no sympathy.

  36. Pam says:

    I think it’s hysterical. I hope he stands his ground and makes her admit that the marriage was just another KK production sham. Does anyone actually believe the crap they promote, they are a sad, sad family with way too much money.

  37. Lily B. says:

    What prenup? This was a freaking 72-day marriage. There is no prenup, no alimony, no nothing on this short of a marriage. All that is based on the LENGTH OF THE MARRIAGE. This proves that celebrities live in an alternative universe with their own rules and the law doesn’t apply to them.

    This woman is beyond disgusting. Fake marriage, fake relationship, fake feelings, fake ass. Please, please, just go away!

  38. AlbaDeTamble says:

    Math isn’t my strongest subject by far, but I need someone to explain to me the timing of this baby’s due date. I’m currently 17 weeks pregnant and due mid-June (June 10). So, how is KK only 12 weeks along (5 weeks behind me) but due only two after me?

    And unless that announcement is three weeks old, I’m not sure how KK/Radar is getting those numbers.

    • BeesKnees says:

      Ok I’m glad I’m not the only one who thought that was odd. Two years ago on new year’s day, I told my family and friends I was pregnant and I was 10 weeks at the time and my daughter was born in August. So the timeline makes no sense, wouldn’t baby Kimye be due in July?

  39. Tiffany says:

    I would like to believe that I am open minded, but I am so sick of the term, ‘baby daddy’. If you are not married, you are having a child with your significant other, boyfriend or partner. That term is one away from an appearance on Jerry Springer. Feel that same about the term, ‘baby mama’. Ugggg.I just won’t accept that we are dumbing down as people.

  40. Maggs says:

    Another Blind Item Revealed on CDAN:

    Blind Items Revealed

    November 28, 2012

    I love this blind item. It seems that this A list reality star had to go scrambling to find a place that wanted her to host a New Years Eve gig. Previously the star had asked for and received $600K for hosting. This year she managed just a fraction of the amount and had to settle for a way less prestigious place to host. Tick tick tick on the 15 minutes.

    Kim Kardashian

    Posted by ent lawyer at 10:10 AM 18 comments

    • Madriani's Girl says:

      No universe yet exists in which she would be considered “A List”.

    • TG says:

      I don’t think this blind is about Kim because didn’t she host at 1OAK? Isn’t that the same type of place she always hosts? The money sounds right though, because they are reporting she made $300K so even though that is a kings ransom for me if she is used to commanding twice that amount that part would fit the blind. I don’t know though since I don’t know what places are considered prestigious. So maybe you are right.

  41. erika says:

    kim isn’t ‘real’ enough for a weight loss deal, people can’t relate to her, she’s never been humble, true, grateful…

    Kim would be a hell of a lot more popular and famous if she would climb down of her high horse. women especially don’t like hr because they feel like they don’t have anything in common with her, they can’t relate to her.

    if Kim would cut down the glam bam thank you man makeup, admit to some faults, have a bad hair day, LAUGH at herself!

    your ‘brand’? wtf is your ‘brand’ uppity, rich, fat ass bitch??? screw men to get famous/photos in magzines? wear clothes 4 times too small for you?

    just go to Sears, your crap is still on the racks, no one is buying the ‘animal print, super tight, Long island Hooker meets Hollywood plastic surgery addict’ look…..

  42. The Wizz says:

    So this Kris dude is nothin but a golddigger?

  43. tabasco says:

    i have a question. did she really get peed on? i’m serious. i’ve heard it a million times, but i’ve never (thank God) seen the vid. does she actually, for real, 100% certain get peed on???? on film? does he pee on her belly? face? i don’t get it. please explain.

  44. tabasco says:

    i have a question. did she really get peed on? i’m serious. i’ve heard it a million times, but i’ve never (thank God) seen the vid. does she actually, for real, 100% certain get peed on???? on film? does he pee on her belly? face? i don’t get it. please explain. (i live in nyc, but i’m from a small town, ok? don’t judge! :)

    • TG says:

      #tabasco – I have seen some of the video but I don’t remember that part so someone will have to answer that one. I just remember not being impressed with her skills and Ray J is so gross. Also, I too think getting peed on is very weird and not a turn on, but there are people out there who like that. I once had a co-worker tell me her much younger boy-toy liked to do that to her and I had to pretend like I didn’t think that was sick and twisted and gross.

  45. BooBooLaRue says:

    Did ya’ll miss this:

    “Mariah’s a$$, way realer than Kim’s”

    HA HA HA this is so funny!

  46. AnnieC says:

    She looks like some swamp creature dragged up from the ocean depths in that web-net dress!

  47. Holly says:

    If she’s really pregnant.. Remember the episodes where she’s had issues with telling the truth..

  48. Yup says:

    Blah blah blah. So sick of this chick and her fam. It’s ruining this site for me. Thankfully there are many others to choose from. Bye.

  49. Yup says:

    Blah blah blah. So sick of this chick and her fam. Its ruining this site for me. Thankfully there are many others to choose from. Bye.

  50. Barbara says:

    When I heard about the different companies rejecting her I thought…aha..finally someone has the class not to associate themselves with a Porn Star…:-)

  51. ataylor says:

    Oh for the love of God…

    Kris Humphries isn’t entitled to any financial compensation if there’s an annulment — which is what he has been asking for THIS WHOLE TIME.

    A pre-nup is only necessary if there is a valid marriage in existance.

    An ANNULMENT would effectively legally declare TO THE WORLD that the marriage NEVER EXISTED. If there isn’t a valid marriage, a pre-nup is superfluous since there is no need for one.

    A DIVORCE would legally declare TO THE WORLD that there WAS a valid marriage, that there IS need for a pre-nup and that the couple is in fact ENDING their valid marriage.

    He wants an ANNULMENT because he says that it was NEVER a real marriage.

    She wants a DIVORCE because she says there WAS a marriage and wants the pre-nup enforced (including the built-in CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT).

    She DOES NOT want an ANNULMENT of “the marriage” because that would effectively prove that the whole marriage ceremony they participated in was FRAUDULENT and might have to RETURN or PAY the monies and gifts donated by sponsors for the wedding. Not only that she MIGHT have to give Kris HIS HALF of the appearance money E! Entertainment paid the Kardashian family for the televised special…and that’s still a BIG MIGHTY MIGHT because he might have signed over all future rights to his appearances/image when he FIRST started showing up on episodes of the “Keeping Up With The Kardashians” show.

    If she REALLY wants out, all she has to do is sign the annulment papers. That’s it. One signature. Done. Over. Finito. No courts. No depositions. No fuss. She doesn’t even need to hand over any cash.

    This is just about HER ego and HIM trying to stick it to her ego.

  52. hownowbrowncow says:

    Kim has more money than Croesus. She could’ve settled out of court. Even the fraudulent marriage settlement with Kris won’t put her in the poorhouse. The classy thing to do would be to give him what he wants and move with her life. But she’s not classy so obviously she’s not going to do that. She cares more about money than anything else – she learned that from her mother that sold her splayed-out image to the highest bidder. Watch as Kim sells out her first child in ways you’ve never even imagined possible. She and her whole family are the lowest form of human being.

  53. anon says:

    Weight watchers gave a comment to Huff post saying they are in a long term agreement with Jessica Simpson & have no desire to include KIM.

    I guess KIm could do a PORN work out video you know more bounce per ounce. KIm’s PR is trying real hard though to get something. Its not fans KIM & K’s attract but it is people that like to watch the train wreck.

  54. Lou says:

    If you google her, it says she’s 53kg? Who the heck is she kidding?? HAHA

  55. janie says:

    I have one question? Why do all these “Stars” that have more money than small countries, go to gyms? They have trainers, right! Put a gym in their homes?! Is is a missed photo op? Why?

  56. crazycatlady says:

    “Respectfully shoot her from the front…” Where do think the story is? That’s right – it’s a story, not a fetus.

    I can see plenty of foam rubber – er, ass – in this top picture. It’s as huge as ever. It’s the same size as it was when it was shoved in and sewn up.

    And oooh I’ve been waiting to say it: She gonna get faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat!