Pippa Middleton dropped by her literary agent following her first book’s total failure

I kind of like how Pippa Middleton has been going back to her old uptradey ways. I missed talking about her, quite honestly. Even though Pippa is definitely a trainwreck, I kind of root for her because I think it must be hard for her to be the younger sister, the “less than” sister to her “more than” duchess sister. And I like that Pippa at least TRIED (and spectacularly failed) to launch her own career as some kind of party-planning book writer. Her book, Celebrate, was simply awful and it bombed in America and the UK, and likely “mortified” Pippa’s royal connections. Not only that, but Pippa’s publishing failure also made her publishers look awful because Pippa refused to go on a book tour and promote the damn thing, and as it turns out, she probably wasn’t contractually obligated to do so (which is a contractual failure by the publisher). So this news makes sense:

After her foray into publishing with Celebrate — her less than riveting guide to entertaining, which failed to feature in any bestseller lists — I can reveal that Pippa Middleton has parted company with her agent.

Literary guru David Godwin masterminded the deal with Penguin that saw the Duchess of Cambridge’s younger sister pocket an estimated £400,000 advance from publisher Michael Joseph. But the book of party planning tips will be their only collaboration.

‘Theirs was a tricky relationship,’ says a literary figure. ‘David was not an obvious choice for Pippa. His writers are heavyweights while Pippa’s niche is fluffy and commercial. In the end it was clear the union was not a happy one.’

At the time it was thought that Pippa’s contributions to the Party Times newsletter, part of her family’s Party Pieces mail order firm, plus her experience as a party planner for London company Table Talk, were sufficient credentials. Under Godwin’s expert guidance, she set out to style herself as the go-to party planning expert. But she failed to impress observers astounded that someone without real writing experience had managed to secure such a substantial offer.

Insiders were more baffled as to why she was being represented by an agent whose stable includes highbrow writers such as biographer Claire Tomalin, novelist Vikram Seth and historian William Dalrymple. In the end, despite Godwin’s expertise, Pippa’s guide was a flop. Poor sales followed and Penguin quickly denied suggestions that their involvement with Pippa was anything more than a one- book deal. And the unlikely partnership, which at first had proved so financially fruitful, is over.

Speaking from his Covent Garden office, David Godwin tells me carefully: ‘I am very sorry it has happened, but yes, it is true: I no longer represent Pippa and I wish her every good luck.’

So what of Pippa’s literary future? A month ago, Waitrose signed her up to write a column. But apart from joking herself that she should write a sequel entitled Bottoms Up — a reference to the attention her shapely behind attracts — whispers of a second tome about weddings appear to have been shelved.

[From The Mail]

The agent can “carefully word” his statements all he wants – he was the dummy who got a Middleton a pile of cash and prayed that her idiotic Pippa Tips would be a resounding success with little to no promotion. I guess we’re supposed to assume that the split was mutual, that Pippa realized that she’s not some amazing writer and that the agent begrudgingly let her go. But I think it went more like the agent getting reamed by his bosses and by the publishing houses he works with for wasting all that money and Pippa was all, “What? You’re not going to give me hundreds of thousands of dollars to dispense advice like ‘If you’re going to have a party, you will need to invite partygoers’?”

But as I said, Pippa is going back to her old uptradey ways. She’s back to “writing” a column for Waitrose’s monthly magazine and she’s got a new wealthy boyfriend, Nico Jackson, but she’s still hanging out with other wealthy suitors in between vacations with Nico. According to UK sources, Pippa “is totally smitten with Nico. I think they’ve already chatted about moving in together. She loves the fact that the whole fame thing doesn’t bother him and he’s already had the seal of approval from her family, including Kate and Wills.”

Photos courtesy of WENN, Fame/Flynet.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

40 Responses to “Pippa Middleton dropped by her literary agent following her first book’s total failure”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. India says:

    This chick is just plain boring. And so not attractive.

    • Susi says:

      I know! I’ve never gotten it. I think she is mildly attractive but no great beauty and not even someone I would think was really pretty. She has terrible style, terrible make-up skills, and an unfortunate addiction to fake tan. I’m sure she’s a nice girl but in terms of public personas, she is just blah. There’s nothing there. I could never understand the massive hoo-ha (love that word) about her bum. Her bum is almost non-existent, it was just great tailoring! I think the dress designed for her by Sarah Burton was fantastic and made her look great, accentuating a slim girl’s few curves, but in the end it was the dress that was the star, not Pippa.

    • Jub-Jub says:

      She’s looks incredibly old and rough.

    • Barhey says:

      Don’t kill me but there is something about her face I find attractive. She’s definitely not a classic beauty but she’s interesting looking (too me).

  2. Eleonor says:

    My opinion if she was interested in that book, and not only in the cash, she would have cared more, she would have made efforts to publish a decent book. Instead she didn’t do anything, and this proves she didn’t give a crap about it.

    • littlestar says:

      Exactly. From the exerts I’ve read from the book, I’ve wondered if she didn’t have a ghost writer doing most of the work. Or at least a good editor who would have demanded more and better from her.

  3. LAK says:

    I shall forever be grateful for #pippatips. Entertainment at it’s best.

    • Ally8 says:

      #PippaTip: on someone’s birthday buy them lots of presents and throw them a big party with cake and music and beverages

      • Barhey says:

        Hahaha #Pippatip: Serve refreshments at a birthday party in case guests become thirsty.

        Never gets old.

  4. Nope says:

    I don’t buy this “must be hard for her to be the younger sister”.
    First of all because nobody forced her to start a job she ‘s absolutely unable to perform. Did she have any title / experience / talent that made her assume she was a decent writer or party planner? I mean apart from being invited to parties and watching her family selling cheap party items?
    Secondly because, before publishing the book and accepting the money, she surely had the chance to read her own book and realize it was total crap. Or to ask someone to express an honest feedback about it.
    Finally, what to say about her entourage? Nobody available for advice? Not even the Firm?

    • GoodCapon says:

      “At the time it was thought that Pippa’s contributions to the Party Times newsletter, part of her family’s Party Pieces mail order firm, plus her experience as a party planner for London company Table Talk, were sufficient credentials.”

      Serves them right. More fool to the editors AND Pippa for believing her hype.

      • CC says:

        real writers would have to show way more before getting a book deal, a lot of first writers are forced to pay for publishing their book, or close to it, definitely not that obscene advance.

        Her “credentials”, if you can call it that is that her sister gets to f*ck Wills, and carries the royal embryo.

  5. aquarius64 says:

    Pippa’s image is that of a social climber who is crusing for a rich guy with a title. I think that, along with a lack of skill, is what contributed to the book’s failure.

  6. Merritt says:

    The fact that this book was even published with those ridiculous tips, reflects really badly on the publisher. I can’t see there even being much a market for this type of book, even if the content had been worthwhile. Most people typically search online for party planning ideas now anyway.

    She didn’t put much effort into the project, and the people working with her didn’t make her do more than she felt like doing.

    • Miss South Africa says:

      What annoys me is that the publishers thought that the public is/was consumed with Pippa that we will go crazy over whatever she puts out good/bad

    • gogoGorilla says:

      I think they assumed it would be a good coffee table book, similar to say, something by Martha Stewart. #Fail

      Unless it’s different in the UK, the book agent is just the one who sets up the deal and isn’t actually responsible for the end result. Agents aren’t usually even attached to a publisher; they’re independent and act as a go-between. So, it’s the PUBLISHER that dropped the ball–mainly, the editor, who had to know s/he was reading Toilet Paper Material. I bet that person got canned. The agent probably ditched Pippa because he knew there was no way another lucrative deal would be coming her way.

  7. Simmy says:

    We all know that the only real way to milk the “famous for being famous” thing is to have a sex tape/do a reality show. Since I’m guessing the royal family would shut that s**t down instantaneously, Pippa’s going to have to stick to her social climbing.

  8. Just Me says:

    The other guys she is with are not “suitors”. One is Tom Kingston, an old friend, who has a steady girlfriend. The chunky guy in the other picture is Benjamin Fitzherbert, Lord Stafford’s heir who is married to Pippa’s former roommate Georgina Hewlett. They all went to Edinburgh University together.

    Her book sold over 50,000 copies btw.

    • LAK says:

      irrespective of genre or author, a £250,000 advance indicates that projected sales should have been more than 50,000 copies.

      when proven track record authors can’t secure that much of an advance, it proves the publishers really thought she had the Midas touch.

      the publishers are to be blamed for being so starstruck they struck a terrible deal, Pippa will find it hard to get a new deal because of this failure.

      Her new column is already receiving protests before she’s published a single word. it’s really too bad that she’s now seen as taking advantage of her position.

      All this could have been avoided if the book had been any good.

  9. Bored suburbanhousewife says:

    I missed the Kate goes camping in full makeup & jewelry yesterday so just in case LAK, Sachi, angelic , bluhare or other royal dishers are out there, I’d like to comment on the jewelry wearing big Diana ring & full make up.

    This is the kind of thing that would be regarded as definitely “naff” by true royals & Aristos. I doubt Anne, Camilla, the Queen or any highly born ladies wear their big stones, even engagement rings, while mucking about in wellies or leave off sensible gloves to do so in the country. They’d be without jewelry or tons of eye makeup. The Dowager Duchess Violet would be horrified.

    Makes me think of a scene from the old Upstairs Downstairs–middle class Hazel has married above her station, packing for country house party. Rose the maid stops her packing her fancy jewels,, saying ” Lady Marjorie always said, no diamonds in the country!”

    • LAK says:

      We had thought that the class thing was a thing of the past.

      • Bored suburbanhousewife says:

        Even in America wearing flashy stones and looking too done up in venues where most people are expected to dress in a practical manner would be looked at as nouveau riche affectation. It’s not necessarily a snob thing more of try hard perception. E.g. Painted face, designer clothes, long painted nails, diamond jewelry whilst handing out snacks to pre schoolers at 10 in the morning or taking them to the pumpkin patch in cold wet weather. I’ve seen it!!

    • Kate says:

      It was an official engagement to get the Scouts some publicity. It’s actually been the tradition since the QM visited bombed out families to dress in their best, as they think it’s a compliment to the people they visit.

      I agree with LAK that that sort of snobbery is unfortunate and actually not really something you see that much in this country, now. And the royal family traditionally looked on everyone who wasn’t royal as pretty much a lump. If they weren’t royal they were lower in class terms so they didn’t really worry about distinctions.

      I have no issue with her background, or her getting dressed up for public engagements. My issue is she does very few public engagements and we fund her role now, so she should be earning that public subsidy.

    • Susi says:

      I don’t understand why everyone keeps banging on about the “no gloves thing”. She is clearly wearing gloves in the first picture – you can see them covering her wrists with the rest of them covered as her gloved hands are in her pockets. In the article quoted it even mentions that she took them off in order to participate in the activities.

      Agreed, she needs to learn to do “daytime makeup” – minimal makeup that just freshens you up without it looking like you are wearing any. Also, I doubt that is her real ring, probably a copy she wears out and about – although I really don’t see the point in it. She should have just left it at home.

  10. Birdix says:

    Her agent would have made a percentage of the money she got from Penguin. Penguin is out the advance, not her agent (although he doesn’t come out of this looking too savvy).

    • LAK says:

      it’s the publisher who looks bad for not doing due diligence and buying at such a premium AND then not policing this new author so that the end result was good for market. That’s completely on the publisher.

      The Agent’s job is to get the best price for their client irrespective of client’s talent. I would say they come out of this looking very good indeed. if i wanted to write a book, i’d be beating down his door if he can pull this sort of advance out of a publisher.

      • Another K says:

        Well said. I totally agree. And why did she object to doing any public appearances, interviews, etc.? Well, I should clarify that and say that I am not aware that she did any publicity for the book. Maybe the publisher smelled a stinker early on and wanted it to quietly fade into the sunset with a minimum of fanfare? I am one of the dummies who bought the silly thing, and yup, it’s a stinker.

      • Birdix says:

        True… but that agent can only pull that so many times and then he won’t have the ear of any editors. There are so many proposals out there that editors use agents as a way to narrow the field.

  11. Sal says:

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/kate-middleton/9895031/Theres-plenty-for-Pippa-Middleton-to-celebrate.html

    Last three paragraphs. It’s still selling and expected to do so, especially throughout Europe. I’m not a pippa defender by any means (though I like her much better than her lazy sister), but this criticism is actually factually wrong.

    • Just Me says:

      Thanks for posting that. If you include American sales her figures are over 50,000 books sold. And yet I keep reading that she sold only 2,000 copies and the book is an utter failure.
      I quite understand that people don’t like her and think she only got the contract because of whom her sister married ( which is of course true). Some of the criticisms however are unfair. She does say the turkey is good for a large gathering, but then in the next sentence suggests that for a smaller group one might try a goose – so she was just making a comparison and it is not so silly. Nobody ever mentions the second sentence.

      Whatever. The book is not a masterpiece, but it is hardly the flop it is made out to be. But the general consensus among people who have never looked at it is that it is so, and you can’t buck the general consensus.

      • Cazzie says:

        50,000 copies sold at $2/per book royalites = $100,000

        Pippa got a $600,000 advance against royalties, so the publisher has still lost a lot of money on her. Like, they overestimated her royalties by half a million dollars.

        A half million dollar loss (at minimum) counts as a failure, in my opinion.

      • Justme says:

        from the Telegraph article
        “The publisher had made a profit on the book before it had even sold a copy, thanks to serial and foreign rights (it has been a huge success in France, Italy and Holland).”and then

        “Over at the Bookseller, its editor, Philip Jones, believes that Celebrate “still has lots of legs in it. It sells pretty consistently and continues to hang around the best-sellers. I think, in the long term, it could tick over very nicely.”

        the Bookseller is the magazine which tracks book sales.
        So they did not lose money on it.

  12. acp says:

    Who cares?! She already got PAID. And let’s not be naive and think that Pippa doesn’t have a million offers coming to do a billion different things for a zillion dollars. I just hope she finds someone that truly respects her and is utterly loyal to her and won’t use her. So there, haters!! Trying to only put out energy that you want to receive (it is Holy week after all 😉

  13. Lisa says:

    Okay, really? Why does she need a book?

  14. Izzy says:

    Too bad they don’t give out Razzies for Worst Book. Surely this would’ve been a contender…

  15. A Fan says:

    That’s what happens when you ride on someone else’s coat tails (ahem, Justin Bieber’s mom). Go away.

  16. Melissa says:

    Am I the only one in love with her outfit in the last picture? I need that cost, and to move to London!

  17. Elise says:

    I love how defensive Waitrose is in their decision to sign her and do the monthly column. I hope they know what they’re doing. And their best defense is that critics are “jealous.” I think Waitrose forgets their readers are critiquing Pippa’s culinary talent (apparent or lack thereof), and not her fashion sense.

  18. emem says:

    whatever happen to her she looks so old. whoever said this chic is better looking than her sister better wake up always picked kate over her