Justin Theroux ‘got weirded out by all the rushing’ for his wedding to Aniston

In last week’s tabloids, there was yet another story about Jennifer Aniston and Justin Theroux and their failed (broken!) wedding plans and how everything is falling apart, and poor, poor Jennifer. I didn’t think much of it, only that I find it weird that every tabloid isn’t running stories about JustJen’s doomed romance, just because that is what tabloids seem to be built for: endlessly throwing pity parties for Jennifer Aniston. While I do think there’s trouble in skinny-jeans paradise, I never really considered the idea that Jennifer and Justin are completely DONE. Well, yesterday we were treated to endless headlines like “Jennifer Aniston, Justin Theroux Resurface Amid Split Rumors” and “Jennifer Aniston and Justin Theroux Reunite Amid Breakup Rumors”. You can see the X17 exclusive photos here.

So, what does it mean? It means – to me – that Jennifer and Justin are far from over. As I said, “canceling wedding plans” doesn’t automatically mean they’re breaking up. For one thing, Justin isn’t even sure if his HBO pilot is going to get picked up. He still needs Jennifer to help with that, and if and when it gets picked up, then there will be a host of new problems because the series does film in New York and Jennifer is adamant about staying in LA. It also means that Jennifer and Justin have already put a lot of time (and famewhoring) into this relationship and it would be a pain in the ass for both of them to start from scratch with new people. That’s my prediction/hope: that Jennifer and Justin stay together for a while longer.

That being said, it does seem that Justin is increasingly over The Aniston Show, you know? The subtext of People Magazine and Us Weekly’s reporting continues to be that Justin is kind of tired of everything in their lives being about what she wants, what she needs, about her issues and her hair and her projects, etc. Us Weekly’s new story about the situation seems to emphasize that too. A source tells the mag that they postponed the wedding because “Justin got weirded out by all the rushing. Nothing has happened on that front in a month… She has been cranky from this stress… Justin’s never seen her like this.” So, Jennifer was super-stressed out and yet – once again – Justin is the one pulling the plug on the wedding. Interesting.

Photos courtesy of WENN, Pacific Coast News.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

144 Responses to “Justin Theroux ‘got weirded out by all the rushing’ for his wedding to Aniston”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Elle says:

    She annoys me! All she does is make crap movies. If it weren’t for her link to Brad and Angelina no one would care about this woman.

  2. brin says:

    He should put on some Rob Kardashian socks cause he’s getting cold feet.

  3. Tulip Garden says:

    A tabloid is reporting about a break-up/postpostment without any evidence?? I’m shocked, shocked I tell you :)

    • FLORC says:

      If this only came from NE and Star and tabs of that caliber then I would agree with you, but People has also said this and People is the go to rag for publicists. Something is going on and there are a million conspiracy theories for it, but something is happening.

    • Tulip Garden says:


      I see your point. I do think that something is going on but I think that the something is that People magazine knows that Jennifer Aniston makeup/breakup/baby/ex drama sells magazines. I think they put one of these stories on the cover as often as they can especially now that print media is taking a hard hit.
      As for if Aniston is in cahoots? Hmmm, I can’t imagine that it would bother her either way. There have been far worse things written next to her face on a magazine cover.
      Of course, I have no idea how much input publicists have in People magazines covers but I do know that the mosted vested in People magazines sales is People magazine.

  4. Dhavynia says:

    Yeah he’ll stick around to make sure the show gets picked up and he has enough money to keep buying the skinny pants

    • CG says:

      If the show gets picked up, that’s a convenient excuse for them to break up, right? It shoots in NYC, and she obvs doesn’t want to leave L.A. So then they’ll break up and the tabloid narrative will be “poor Jen, cruelly dumped by Justin who put his career before love!” Even though I won’t watch the show if it gets picked up, I kinda want this to happen!

  5. Rock says:

    I don’t believe he is over the Aniston Show. Since the beginning he knew she stays relevant exclusively by being gossip material.
    And now he is relevant, too, as part of this Reality-show. He is not going to happen as an A-list actor or writer, and I am sure he is aware of this.
    So, as tired as he is, the Show will go on.

  6. DanaG says:

    Yep I think skinny pants will hold tight. I don’t think they will make it down the aisle Justin probably doesn’t want the drama of being Mr Aniston.

  7. Feebee says:

    No sympathy for any of these prats getting caught up having emotional toil. If they want to manufacture all this crap they have to be prepared for the finished product to belong in the ‘factory seconds’ bin.

  8. Sannie says:

    Why does she care so much about a wedding? It’s the mariage that counts.

  9. Jen says:

    I don’t understand this couple really. If they did not want all these odd stories about break-ups and what not, then why put a story in People Magazine (the one publicists have on speed dial) about postponing the wedding? If that story had not run, then they would have gone on quietly in their own way.

    So, the question seems like, was that story printed to keep the other stories going, (to stay in the press), good or bad (knowing most would be bad) or to really let people know a wedding would most likely not happen–not necessarily a break up, but no wedding–just like with his other girlfriend and her other beaus. They just seem odd to me.

    • lisa2 says:

      I agree about the 2 stories well 3 can’t recall; in People. I don’t think anyone was really all into this wedding. Yes the media was trying to do a Who will get there first” but that was only on the gossip sites. The outside world is over this. So when her fans say why are people hoping for a break up (I actually want them together and MARRIED) they need to go back to the People Mag covers. First one right after the Oscars. And really why was that one even there; making some big announcement. I really think her PR guy got wind of something happening with Brad/Angie. I think he thought it was a wedding and we now know it was something more; Angelina’s surgery. And that to me is why there was that Oscar/People cover came out. And as everyone noted it was dumb and didn’t make sense. posters here even wondered why People would give Jennifer Aniston a cover and not devote it to the Oscars. They just jumped too quick and got the wrong info because while I don’t believe all that PR moves; I think this was a big PR move and it was a misstep. They were countering what they thought was coming out from Brad/Angie (wedding) and again they got the wrong info.

      I think Jennifer/Justin are together. Whether it last or not who knows. I just like that she is in a relationship and the “fake connection stories” are ending.

    • Emma - the JP Lover says:

      @Jen, who wrote: ” If they did not want all these odd stories about break-ups and what not, then why put a story in People Magazine (the one publicists have on speed dial) about postponing the wedding? If that story had not run, then they would have gone on quietly in their own way.”

      Agreed. Furthermore, why did Jennifer bother hijacking the “People” magazine Oscar edition to announce their upcoming wedding?

      I have a theory. I don’t think there was ever really meant to ‘be’ a wedding. I think this was all a PR stunt designed to compete with/steal thunder away from the Jolie-Pitt wedding (which I seriously believe happened over Christmas with their family members in attendance).

      The ‘this-is-all-fake’ clincher for me was the live interview with Jennifer at that Life Time “Crazy” red carpet event (the one where she had those marks on her back). It was about three weeks after that “People” magazine ‘Just-Jen wedding’ issue. The female reporter asked Jennifer about her [wedding] dress. Jennifer got this ‘wtf are you talking about’ look on her face and said “What dress?” The reporter was genuinely surprised and confused by Jennifer’s reaction–because of the recent “We’re having/planning a wedding, y’all!”–People issue. The reporter said: “You don’t have a dress?” and Jennifer recovered by saying “Well, I’m spontaneous” with that weird ‘I’m really just like Rachel Greene’ look she gets. And I laughed, thinking ‘busted!’ :)

      Oh crap, I can’t find ‘that’ video sound bite, but here’s one from the same event. The female reporter in the one I saw was American and was truly surprised when Jennifer said “What dress? I don’t have a dress.” I’m thinking they pulled that one. She should have known she’d be asked that question:


      • lisa2 says:


        I remember that. And she also said shrugging it all off; something like it will all probably come together last minute. That she likes being spontaneous (since when)

        I just remember after seeing it that she just did to People Magazine what she did to Vogue after the Uncool comment. That Vogue had gone tabloid. after they printed HER statement. A statement she called them back a week later to make. Same thing she did on Oprah after that magazine came out. “It was 100 years ago”..

        I see a pattern. People Mag is not going to talk about her wedding out of the blue unless they got some news. They haven’t done it with Brad/Angie. The engagement yeah but nothing else about their wedding really.

      • Zombie Shortcake says:

        I don’t think they have any real desire to get married either; this relationship has been to increase their media exposure.

      • Virgilia Coriolanus says:


        That’s what I didn’t get either. Jennifer was what, 38 or 39 when she said that. She’s been in the business for over a decade at that point…had to do tons of interviews. She didn’t think that they wouldn’t print what she said? ESPECIALLY knowing that her ex and his woman is a hot topic?

        Yeah, I’m all for her saying what she wants, but don’t do it and then complain that they went tabloid on you. They are in the business of making money. Any fool with half a brain knew that the minute she said that, that magazine was going to sell like hotcakes. I bet the reporter had to do a little happy dance when she said that.
        I bet that editor just sat there and laughed when he/she heard/read what Jennifer had said. I would’ve.

        She’s a grown woman, not a little girl. She needs to act and be treated like one.

      • Camille (TheOriginal) says:

        Good lord, she is so incredibly inarticulate! The way she had to parrot back the reporters question, it was like watching a ditzy contestant in one of those pageant shows. Yikes.

    • lexi says:

      she is the idiot. i can’t stand her fake and self manufactured media persona. I am glad brad dumped her and i hope he did screw around on her cause she is so self absorbed. she still can’t get it together – can’t keep a guy, can’t’ get to the altar and still can’t decide when to have a child she seems to want so badly. Save it bitch – none of this will ever happen for you!

  10. Spooks says:

    Why do people get engaged and then don’t marry for years? What’s the point. Jen And Justin, or Kate H and Matt Bellamy. They’re engaged for years. Just be boyfriend and girlfriend then. Yeez.

    • Erinn says:

      I don’t see anything wrong with it. We’re getting married a year and a half or so after our engagement – it might be a bit longer.

      There’s no rules about how fast you get engaged. Some people like to enjoy their engagement without rushing around planning a wedding. If it makes them happy, who cares?

    • MissTaken says:

      FYI Jenifer has not been engaged for a year yet! So I think the pressure for her wedding is ridiculous…. There are no kids plus she has been married before, so yeah!

      • Spooks says:

        Not yet a year? It seems like forever.
        I get long dating and waiting to get married or not getting married at all.
        But when you get engaged, I presume you have decided to get married, so why wait for 3 years? I doesn’t take 3 years to plan a wedding.

      • Virgilia Coriolanus says:

        Well, the reason why there’s such speculation about her getting married, when she’s getting married is because she started it. The only reason we’re even speculating about her wedding, beyond the norm, is because she had that People cover back the day after the Oscars (in January or February) about how she was getting married this past spring.

        Then when spring came and went, she had another cover saying that her wedding was on hold. One, that was obvious, as she wasn’t married yet, and Two, who pays for two People covers for a wedding that hasn’t happened yet?

        Something’s going on. Whether they’re broken up, trying to be relevant with the Brangelina, or what? I don’t know. But something is going on….they’re in their forties. They’re not young, immature things anymore…they (presumably) know what they want…they didn’t have to get engaged.

      • MissTaken says:


        Relevant with the brange? I dear say neither of them are very relevant. Just in the minds of the extreme fans on both sides of this sick twisted triangle.

        Ragging on one side and tearing down the other while giving a pass to the side you favor is THE dumbest thing I have ever witnessed. Just makes most fans look loco.

        Clean this mess up folks….they are all celebrities playing media games. We don’t know them.

      • Virgilia Coriolanus says:


        I’m not making excuses for anyone. We know that Jennifer was supposed to get married this past spring. Why? Because she paid for a People cover, the day after the Oscars, to say so. This spring came and went….then another cover saying that she was putting it off. Why on earth would Jennifer Aniston put out TWO People magazine covers about her wedding date, if she didn’t want there to be talk about it.

        She’s not some young, naïve, twenty-something actress who is just letting her pr team do whatever they want…she knows how her actions are going to be taken. Especially as she has a history of using her pr to try and benefit herself-Five years after Brad, anyone?
        That’s why I said she’s trying to keep relevance with the Brange…she has a history of doing so. Heck, that’s her whole post-Friends, post-divorce career in a nutshell.

        And how am I excusing Brad and Angelina’s actions toward their engagement? They haven’t done anything. I think they had a People cover for their engagement, after Angelina was photographed with her ring on. Besides saying (when asked when they were going to get married) that it would be soon and small ( and that’s been Brad, Angelina hasn’t said anything), they haven’t put out any statements or anything like that. So what am I excusing them for? I would honestly like to know, if I am forgetting something, or haven’t read/heard about something they have done that could be construed as trying to be relevant and/or famewhorey.

      • Gina says:

        @ Virgilia, she ‘paid’ for the People cover did she? I mean it’s not like they’d put her on the cover without her writing them a cheque. Who does she think she is? A celebrity?

        And when the Brange did it, complete with exclusive pics and ring details, it was just after they got engaged, right? They didn’t have another cover Dec last year with Brad posing like Fabio and spilling wedding details? Around the time Killing them softly came out?

        No, that would be so desperate. And that’s Jennifer’s territory.


      • Virgilia Coriolanus says:


        First off, thank you for showing that to me. I’ve been looking through the covers at People, and I must’ve missed that one, as in their archives only the engagement one shows up.

        Second, I side eyed both, especially the first cover, that Jennifer had because of the fact that it’s the freaking Oscars. Why in the world would People magazine give Jennifer Aniston, someone who hasn’t ever been nominated for an Oscar, the cover of their magazine-just so she can say that she’s getting married in a few months. That’s it. Nothing more…no exclusives on her dress, where she’s getting married, no great reveal if they’re going to try for a baby (not saying she is, but nothing juicy enough to push the actual winners to a side bar), and so on.

        So yeah, I believe she paid (maybe not in money, but she paid for it somehow) for that cover. I don’t see People salivating over getting her on the cover, INSTEAD of Oscar winners.

        Third, Brad and Angelina had been engaged for MONTHS (I believe he said he proposed sometime in 2012) before she was even seen with the ring on. She was seen with the ring on, was asked about it, and Brad’s manager confirmed it to People. Angelina hasn’t said a word about her engagement, and Brad has said that it was going to be soon and small-from the article you showed me-plus I think he’s said the same on red carpets when asked.
        Engagement article in People: http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20587035,00.html

        So those two covers…one of which was a promotion for work in which he simply said they would get married soon without a lot of people, just family. I’m not seeing the connection between putting out covers to say you’re getting married that spring a day after the Oscars, and then putting out another one to say that there’s issue sand they’re putting the wedding off compares to ONE, confirming that you’re getting married/engaged and TWO, getting interviewed because of work and saying, when asked, that you’re getting married soon.

      • Gina says:

        I don’t think I’m going to change you mind about this, you’re obviously pretty heavily invested in ‘team jolie-pitt’, which is fine.

        But just for the sake of it, do you know who was on the cover of the 2012 ‘Oscar edition’? Kate Middleton, the title was ‘a princess on her own’ and it had the same sidebar of Oscar coverage.


        Where was the outrage then? There was none. I think that says a lot about the whole straw man argument being used here. But i’m sure you still don’t see the connection.

      • Virgilia Coriolanus says:


        What is the connection? Americans, not all but apparently a lot, love hearing about Kate and William. I probably would too, if I hadn’t been reading this site since before they got engaged and found out how freaking lazy she is.

        I don’t have a sense of outrage about Jennifer getting a cover the day after the Oscars; I feel the same for thing for Kate. I side eye both of them. They’re both obviously selling something, otherwise they wouldn’t go to PEOPLE. Jennifer is selling her wedding; Kate is trying to unsuccessfully get us to think that she’s a hard worker and actually cares about less fortunate people.

        I’m not saying that Jennifer is this awful, horrible person for getting the cover, both covers, but what’s the point? I know what Kate’s point was. O know what Jennifer’s is. She’s trying to sell her wedding at the expense of the Oscar winners, just like Kate did (although the Oscars should’ve meant more to Jennifer than Kate).

        My point in the covers is that when someone is said to be using their engagement/PEOPLE magazine, Jennifer has Brad (since he’s the only one who’s said anything) beat. She’s had two covers; one giving some unnecessary miscellaneous news about her wedding; the other saying that she’s putting it off for some reason. Brad and Angelina had an engaged cover, which I think Jennifer had one too? And while promoting Killing Them Softly, Brad was asked about when they were getting married.

        I see a big difference, not necessarily a bad one, in the way they go through their engagements. We know Jennifer and Justin are having issues; we don’t know anything about Brad or Angelina.

    • Kim says:

      I agree. No engagement should be longer than year or whats the point? You can have a commitment but why why bother with the formal engagement if you have intention of marrying for 2 or more years?

    • Sandy says:

      What bothers me is the couples that get engaged after getting pregnant and never actually make it to the altar. What is really the point of getting engaged if they know they won’t get married. Did they just get engaged because of the pregnancy? Just stay boyfriend and girlfriend. So many celebs do it. Two kids, and engaged 10 years, someone should write a sitcom

      • MissTaken says:

        I am engaged, it’s been 14 months since I said yes…. And I do not have a dress or a wedding date! :O why this bothers others I have no idea…it’s my wedding and my engagement with my fiancé and we will move at our pace. Don’t see why it should annoy folks one way or the other.

        FYI we have no kids, except for our cute 2yr old jack russell terrier ziggy. Maybe if ziggy fussed I would speed things up for his sake lol ;)

      • Tiffany :) says:

        I agree, MissTaken. It is up to a couple how long they want to stay engaged before getting married. It really makes NO difference on the lives of anyone else.

        I also have a jack russell terrier (who is a magical combination of fun, fiesty, and cuddly)…so perhaps I am a bit bias! ;)

      • MissTaken says:

        Omg Tiffany! aren’t they the sweetest,craziest loving little dogs, so much fun. Love love them.

      • Tiffany :) says:

        Yes! I love them so much!

        My little one has so much personality, it is crazy. They are a very smart breed, and I think that gives them a really interesting sense of humor. So many people think of them as hyper, but I have found that they are super loyal and snuggly! I call her my little cuddle bug. :)

  11. Suze says:

    If they wanted to be married they would just get married.

    If they want to stay in the forefront of celebrity news, they will announce an engagement, flaunt a ring, send out hints about the nuptials, back off of the engagement/wedding talk justifying it with a bunch of “we have issues to resolve” talk, and then start the process all over again.

    I know which situation I think they want.

    And I say this as an Aniston FAN.

    • MissTaken says:

      Suze? Can this same logic be applied to the jolie//pitt? Cuz no one expected an engagement from them because of their stance on equality etc and then out of nowhere it popped up….while promoting stuff, the kids want it etc? But still no wedding! And I know there has been things that can get in the way…but then there is the whole “if they wanted to be married they would just get married” argument so lets remember this.

      • akivasha says:

        I think they get a pass because (at least for me) they said they were in no hurry to get married.
        any time asked about it, responses were always “we are in no hurry”

        Jennifer tries TOO HARD at everything now and I think it obvious. I believe there was a date somewhat set at a point but then her PR machine keeps giving tidbits here and there on the ‘wedding’ the Jolie Pitts never talked about tidbits, just one day that they will get married just “in no hurry” :)

      • Suze says:

        Yep, I think it applies to Jolie/Pitt too. Unless they are married already, in which case it vanishes.

        And I am a fan of the Brange as well.

        But I don’t think you can say that they don’t use their relationship to keep themselves in the press.

      • Sandy says:

        Well, they haven’t had any covers promoting their wedding, besides Brad on People in November last year, saying it will be a simple family affair,other than that they haven’t said anything in months. They didnt have People covers announcing plans and postponing. When they got engaged, they stated they weren’t in a rush. Also, they have actually been busy unlike Jennifer. Brad has been working on WWZ, Angelina on Unbroken, and let’s not forget she had a mastectomy

      • Virgilia Coriolanus says:

        I agree somewhat with you Suze. With Jennifer and Justin, God yes. That’s her MO right there. With the Brange, I don’t doubt that they use their image for promotion sometimes, its normal (in that business-they talk about their kids a lot during interviews, even if they don’t say anything really personal about them), and they control it on their terms.

        But I don’t think that they’ve been using their engagement/wedding for promotion. Besides the initial “yes, we’re engaged!” they haven’t really said anything about it, other than Brad saying that he was in charge of the napkins. I think that it’s been “put off” (and who knows if they didn’t plan on having a wedding in Christmas 2013 when he proposed 14? months ago) because of two reasons. Her health/double mastectomy and because he wanted her to have an engagement.

        If you think about it, she’s never had a real, true engagement period. She’s always gotten married very quickly, and in a courthouse. I think he wants to make it special for her…that’s sweet. And the more I look at her ring, the more I like it, although I wish they were emeralds or rubies instead of diamonds.

        I like that it’s not a typical celebrity designed ring, where it’s just some huge diamond, maybe surrounded by some smaller diamonds-a design that looks like it took maybe ten minutes. Her ring looks like he put time into it. I’d wear it.

      • MissTaken says:

        That is hilarious…the fantasies that some of you spin because you are a fan of a celeb is totally scary. Delusion and turning a blind eye is VERY real!!

    • Tiffany :) says:

      People have long enagements ALL THE TIME. It really isn’t a big deal.

      (And can we please get over the AJ/JA competition thing? That is just so stale!)

  12. Liz says:

    The never ending wedding drama seems to be the new triangle for the tabs and like that will go on forever.

  13. Cam S says:

    I’m not fan of Jennifer, but I hope I age as well as her. She has a killer body also

    • EmmaV1 says:

      She does have a great body but her face is aging very averagely and that’s putting it nicely.

    • Kim says:

      Jennifer, Angelina, Katie Holmes and alot of others get subtle work done over the years to make people not see how much work they really have had done. All these girls noses are completely different noses after several nose jobs. Shaving away their noses over the years and they arent fooling anyone. I give more credit to Ashley Simpson for just getting it done & being open about it. Anistons body is a full time job. Hours of daily yoga, personal training, tanning, cellulite treatments etc. This is what she is paid to look like. Non celebs dont have the time or money to do this.

  14. ReelChildofHell says:

    What happened to her new movie where she plays a stripper? Has it bombed already? How does this woman keep getting movies made that go nowhere?! I don’t have anything against her, but damn what a waste.

  15. toto says:

    Jenifer is a tabloid girl…the last 8 year her fame doubled with the drama of her divorce from Brad Pitt.
    now since her engagement with her new man Justin …the tabloid were some how not much interested in the happy couple.
    she has many endorsements and projects therefore she needs more people talk about her no matter if it is positive or negative, her picture must be on tabloid more often to sell her image and products and he also needs more fame for his project. in conclusion they needed a DRAMA to create more buzz for them until they show up stronger than ever queen of hair and king of crotch hair.

    These two did not break up and will not for a long long time.

  16. lower-case deb says:

    i wonder if he’s not secretly a groomzilla. i got that sort of vibe from him.

    ah reminds me the joys of my littlest sister’s wedding. bridezilla-who-swears-she’s-laidback v.s. closet-groomzilla (controlling-yet-well-meaninged mothers and slightly-medicated maid of honor sold separately).

  17. gogoGorilla says:

    I agree it’s odd to put out these stories in People. I wonder if she is using the tabloids to put the screws to him to get him to do what she wants (get married, live on the West Coast, whatever)? Kinda sorta threatening, you know? I could see her pulling a power play like that.

  18. The Original G says:

    I think the other tabs are not covering this story because Jen has aged out of the gossip market, for the most part.

    Wasn’t the estrangement by being separated for long stretches part of the reason her first marriage ended? You’d think she’d make more of an effort to meet her future husband half way.

    Am I the only one that finds her “NYC” boho hat hilarious?

  19. Tessa says:

    If you’re ready to get engaged, you should be ready to get married, especially when you’re middle aged ffs. Rushing? Um, you put a ring on it, you dufus.

  20. Dedrie says:

    Now that he’s singly sought out by the papps and is news.. Well? He has but a short time to become very fabulously rich and famous, grab the hot and rewarding jobs;.. come on lady.. is this demand to marry and settle down.. live like dull old married folks.. for reals?

  21. NM9005 says:

    Why let out news about the wedding being on hold to start with? That’s inviting media in their lives!

    Tbh, many women who social climb go through a lot more. Ugly old men, being paraded around like candy, treated like dumbasses, birthing out their children and sticking it out for more than 10 years all to get that fat check in the end and live the sweet life in a mansion. All in all, JT has it good, he holidays, he meets famous people, his career is in the spotlight and let’s be honest, JA isn’t old and she looks great so he should man up and get married already. He wanted this so he should push through with it. There are worser things in life.

    Then again, this is a man who never got married to his gf of 200 years. Maybe he thinks it’s not worth it.

    Either way, JA is the star and he knows Hollywood well enough to know he’s got nothing say if he wants to stay Mr. Aniston and get more opportunities. Who else would actually date this guy? If he had choice, I’m sure he would have dumped Bivens WAY before Aniston. He laid his bed!

  22. sophie says:

    So why haven’t brangelina gotten married yet. 8 years 6 kids, pitt said during promo for his kts flop that it will be soon, the time is nigh, wants to do it in the kids lifetime, it will be small. You would think after the mastectomy they would have made it a priority and could have done it any time since it was only going to be family. Now she is in Hawaii and he is no where to be seen. In loonland, that means he dumped her. Why has he not married her after 8 years? Is there trouble in brangelina land if pitt is still refusing to marry her?

    • gdsgnsk says:

      Please go back to FF! BP is not refusing to marry her!

      AJ is in Hawaii to look at locations and only has two kids with her, meaning it is a short trip.

      She has done this many times….brings a few kids for a few days while prepping for a film. For example, when she went to Budapest to prep for ITLOBAH and brought two of the girls. She is not filming until the end of the year!!!!

    • Janet says:

      Get lost, Sophie. Scat. Shoo. Vamoose. Go back to Female First with the rest of your co-freaks. You are not welcome or wanted here. Scram.

    • The Original G says:

      There is no evidence that Brange’s relationship is on the rocks. They’re firmly together and they will marry whenever.

      Anniston went to People, HERSELF to promote the engagement slow down and issues preventing their wedding from going ahead. It’s not speculation, it’s confirmed by THEM. No one cares if they marry or just continue on. It’s Anniston’s own self promotion.

      • MissTaken says:

        There is no evidence of trouble with these two either. Just pure speculation and tabloid fodder, yet everyone is busy writing stories and narratives about how their relationship is unfolding.

        There were people cover by brad ” Angie, the kids and our wedding” last year. Still no wedding. So to call out one celeb and give a pass to others because you like them is BS.

        Double standards much????



      • Vera says:

        Actually MissTaken…..there is evidence of trouble between JA and JT because People mag, who is in bed with her PR team, did a cover story of how wedding talk has completely stopped.

        Her pr team is leaking stories of trouble. And the fact she can’t bother to go to NYC while he films shows some truth to the stories of her refusing to go to NYC. What is keeping her in LA???? Nothing.

        She even had her pr team tell People that a wedding was happening in the Spring!

      • MissTaken says:

        Just because wedding plans are on hold or stopped does not equal trouble. Ok? They gave specific reasons why, but its more fun to speculate… I get it! BUT do not be upset when the speculations spread to other parties….

        It’s gossip remember? None of us truly know these folks or what is going on in their lives.

      • The Original G says:

        You’re missing my point Miss Taken. Which is, that this story about Anniston/Theroux engagement problems was given to People by Jen’s publicist. THEY made a PUBLIC statement that they are having issues.

        I’m not calling anyone out and I don’t need any of them to get married to prove anything to me.

      • MissTaken says:

        If I remember correctly when Jen was asked about her wedding she said there were no plan and that she didn’t have a dress yet.

        Yes there was a story about a spring wedding & yes there was a story about the wedding being pushed back because of busy schedules.

        At no point do I recall a story about trouble.. Except for speculation and stories written on blogs. So if you are reading blogs that wants to promote the rumors you may believe it to be true, but its mostly speculation and gossip.

      • Janet says:

        Does anyone beside me have a sneaking suspicion that Brad and Angie may have already married last winter when they had the whole family with them in the Caribbean? Or is it just me?

      • Gina says:

        Well said MissTaken. This is the thing that annoys me, when Jennifer has a wedding themed People cover, it’s because she’s just promoting her fake relationship like the sad little spinster she is destined to be.

        When the Brange do it, People wedding cover, ‘the time is nigh’ quotes, it’s fine, or better still, they’re waiting for gay marriage to be legal or they must already be married, even though they’ve both denied it.

        I mean, it’s just not possible that they aren’t getting married. Or that they used a People cover and quotes for PR, they’re so above that.

        It’s the double standard that bugs me. They both use the media to promote projects, they both have had long-term engagements, they both have had rumours of trouble in paradise with very little evidence to support it.

        But if you like one and not the other, you’ll just believe what’s convenient. So of course Justin’s either desperate to leave her or using her for fame. And we all know she bought her own ugly ring and forced him to propose. Why else would he be with her, right?

        They said the wedding plans are on hold, I don’t remember anyone saying indefinitely, but this is obviously them ‘fame-whoring’ their relationship yet again. If they wanted to be married, they would be. Except the Brange. They’re obviously married already.

      • Liberty says:

        @MissTaken..actually, you are on gossip website where writers and commenters alike have fun with gossip and speculation. You keep chiding people by noting it is all speculation and cite things from which you yourself are engaging in speculation via the assumption that what you see is what you think it is. You then go on making rather more serious unfounded speculations about the celebrities and commenters. It almost reminds me of the comment teams hired by PR teams. Or, someone fantasizing that they have a such a real emotional investment to protect celebrities from the gossip that butters their bread that they spend their time patrolling gossip sites…to make certain their own fantasy truth is upheld.

        Interesting either way.

    • Maya says:

      The difference with Brad and Angelina is that no one is in doubt that they will be together forever and that they will marry. They both said they wont marry until gay marriage is legal and that wasnt legalised until last week or so. The Jolie-Pitts have always kept their promises and now they will marry soon with their family and friends but without the media nor the publics’s knowledge.

      As for Jennifer – she has been with atleast 7 men in the last 8 years and she has been dumped by all of them and none has anything nice to say about her. Jennifer comes across as a needy, selfish, vain woman who wants it her way or the high way. Jennifer is known to play with the media about her relationships hence the reason no one is believing Jennifer and Justin will ever marry. Especially since Jennifer cheated with Justin while he was still living with his girlfriend of 14 years Heidi. If Justin never married Heidi even after that many years so why would he marry Jennifer? Everyone knows he is only with Jennifer for her money and the possiblity to get some new movie roles but that hasnt worked out for Justin. He is forced to take tv shows now so lets see if Justin stays with Jennifer is the show does take off.

  23. janie says:

    Good grief just go away!!! I think we all agree this ‘big’ wedding is for Brad’s benefit. Everything J does is calculated, right down to *sources say*. Brad did the her sooo wrong, poor J?! Maybe she needs to look in the mirror, she did the same to Justin’s gf of 14 yrs. Just go away, please.

  24. Jennifer12 says:

    Jennifer is the kind of person who guys adore in the beginning. She’s all about them, very warm and affectionate, generous and so on. Then the real her comes out: selfish, needy, self centered. JMO

    • FLORC says:

      It’s the lack of compromise that stands out to me. The real estate in NY when courting Justin and then the quick sales with a new pad in CA. She’s a woman that should be fine single and probably likes it that way. However, she can’t keep playing the jilted ex of brad struggling to find a nice guy while not dating.

      Sigh, I wish she would just stick to what she’s good at. Flipping real estate, investing seed money in businesses, being a spokeswoman. She can live forever on that dough. Her acting is eft out of the list because she’s just awful unless other actors carry her so the film isn’t a bomb.

      • epiphany says:

        +1 FLORC. Aniston is not a very good actress – certainly the least talented of the ‘Friends’ ensemble. Not hating, just making a statement. Aniston’s real talent is her natural business acumen – I wonder if she even realizes it, or if it’s just a fun sideline for her? That she flips expen$ive properties consistently for a profit in this economy, while other celebs are taking losses, says something. She should do what Wayne Rogers did; after 3 years of playing second fiddle to M*A*S*H star Alan Alda, Wayne quit showbiz and became a real estate investor. He’s been wildly successful – more so than any of his former co-stars. Jen, take note!

      • apsutter says:

        ITA with all of that!! She should just stick with being a spokesperson because lots of women love her and would buy whatever she’s peddling. She could totally be the next Suzanne Somers.

      • cs says:

        What profit? I thought it was reported she took a $500k loss on those apartments in NYC?

      • FLORC says:

        Sing it! This will never happen though. My personal theory is she loves the spotlight and the perks of acting. She enjoys her circle of friends and trash talking others. Being in the tabs and playing the victim. All this because it gets her attention and strokes her ego. Hell, i even think once she’s past child bearing years we’ll hear about her wanting to adopt until the day she dies.
        The woman is insanely rich and can vacation in cabo and never have to make another movie… but then we would forget about her….

      • Janet says:

        @cs: The way the housing market is in Manhattan right now, it would be almost impossible to sell at a loss. The prices are over the moon.

    • Maggie says:

      How do you know? Like really!!! These types of comments are so silly to me. PPL need to separate the person we read about in gossip rags from the private person because we basically know jack shit.

    • epiphany says:

      @cs – you’re right her NYC apartments were sold at a loss, but she didn’t purchase them as an intended flip property; she bought them to be her ‘love nest’ with Justin. When her short (very short!) love affair with Manhattan fell by the wayside, she had to unload them, and therefore, took a loss. Any other property which she purchased with the intention of renovation and resale has made money. Girl has an eye for real estate and should do it full-time.

  25. Madriani's Girl says:

    His body shape weirds me out too much. Short, super-skinny legs and that big-a$$ed head!!!! He is too disproportionate. Plus, he’s hairy. Blech.

    I wonder if she ever looks at his forehead vein and thinks about the one Angie has.

  26. Sara says:

    Those army green pants she wears look Ambercrombie circa 1999

  27. Paloma says:

    I think the major problem is they don’t want to live in the same state and every other problem is made worse because of this. If his show gets picked up, this will be the death knell.

  28. Ginger says:

    Is this really a surprise? Jen in notoriously self centered and Justin was with Heidi novena for 14 years? No wedding? I’m sure he’s freaked and running for the hills by now. Haven’t they been coupled up for a year? Just enough time to really get to know each other warts and all.

  29. The Original G says:

    Ugh. This is so tedious. It’s just another one of those stories where she puts out that she’s want to have a baby/reunion/new house/wedding/production company. Then, later whene we ask how that’s going, we’re chastised for being narrow minded/invading her privacy/making stuff up. Tedious.

    • Bex says:

      This is why I don’t buy into the Aniston brand – because I hate being told what to do – LOL. She uses the PR machine to sell me on all things JA. Then there’s that second layer of PR that leaks “sources” when it comes to spreading things that America’s Sweetheart can’t say on her own.

      Hijacking the Oscars takes some pretty evil genius PR. I’d respect her a lot more if she didn’t care what the public thought about her image. It’s not rocket science – especially when her product is RomCom fluff. I don’t have to believe she’s capable of anything greater than shopping, tanning and enjoying being rich and single.

  30. Mew says:

    Stop being so wedding centered. Stop being a bridezilla. Life could work much better that way.

  31. skuddles says:

    So the deal is if his career doesn’t take off he’ll marry her? Aw, now that’s true love!

    Postponing or cancelling a wedding doesn’t signal the end of a relationship immediately… but it almost always means the end of the relationship eventually. Not many couples can stay solid when one of them balks after the proposal is already out there.

  32. brumhildawayne says:

    Mr. and Mrs. Hand-Holding. THAT is what bothers me the most about them. I can’t STAND adult hand-holders. It’s not comfortable if you’re different heights! There is just something about it that makes me wince.

  33. Anon says:

    Whatever is going on with Jennifer and Justin, you can bet–it won’t be her fault–because as she’s said, “she fights dirty”. What person only takes 2% fault when a relationship fails?

    No man, mother or child will ever be good enough for Jennifer Aniston…the BPD.

  34. Joanna Joanna says:

    This man does not want to be married.Wasn’t he with Heidi for 14 years and didn’t marry her?I know that for some reason Jen is desperate to lock this thing down with this leather loving hipster,but he is obviously not interested in being married.But he IS interested in the career boost from dating her.I never heard of him before they started dating,not he is starring in a HBO show.Good move Justin.

  35. HN says:

    Just go away Jennifer Aniston. We can see through your fakeness. Every relationship she gets into, her PR team has to make it look like they will get married and they are so in love. Please. Wonder why Vince Vaugn ran for the hills when her PR started saying that her and Vince were engaged. Lol

  36. Maritza says:

    The only way this guy would marry her were if she got pregnant and since that is not going to happen I doubt he will ever marry her.

  37. The Original G says:

    WHY are people bringing up Brangelina? They’ve nothing to do with this.

    This story is about Jen and Justin delaying their announced wedding for some reason. Give it a rest JenHens.

  38. dorothy says:

    So over her. What exactly is she relevant for anyway? She hasn’t been an anything of any value in years. Her biggest achievement was being dumped for someone else. There, I said it.

  39. Jayna says:

    I have to say he looks really good in that last photo.

  40. The Original Mia says:

    What exactly is the problem? No one was pushing for them to get married except the tabloids. I don’t understand this new narrative she’s creating for herself. Are we supposed to feel sorry because her marriage-shy boyfriend, who loved living in NYC isn’t all that gung-ho about marrying her and staying on the West coast permanently? Like really?

    As if the writing hasn’t been on the wall for awhile now that the marriage wasn’t going to happen. These are people with the means to get married whenever, wherever they choose. They could call up any Hollywood wedding planner and have a ceremony of their dreams within a few weeks. It was never going to happen, so I’m legit confused why JustJen is playing it this way.

  41. JenniferJustice says:

    There was a blind item about a month ago saying a certain female celebrity recently had a miscarriage, kept it secret from the public, and now her fiance is getting cold feet b/c he absolutely wants children and fears she cannot have them or carry full-time. Many thought this blind was about Jennifer Aniston. Hmmm……

  42. TOPgirl says:

    All these stories are just hinting at…there’s going to be a movie about “The Breakup” part 2

  43. Miss Melissa says:

    I can’t decide if he is truly in to her, or just riding her coattails.

    I’d like her to find some happiness just because I want to know it works out in the long run some times, but it all seems to elude her.