Angelina Jolie takes Zahara, Shiloh, Vivienne & Knox shopping in Sydney: so cute?

109974PCN_Jolie37

A few days ago, Brad Pitt was in Sydney, Australia and Angelina Jolie was able to take some time off from work, and they took the kids out on a yacht on the Sydney Harbor. You can see the photos here – the yacht is called Ghost, and the kids seemed to be having a ball on Ghost, posing for their dad and he snapped photos of everyone. If you look through those photos, it looks like Angelina is fussing at someone (Shiloh, probably, because that kid just seems like a little hellraiser, just like her mom).

We didn’t have access to those photos, but we do have these new photos – Angelina out and about in Sydney with… let’s see… Shiloh, Zahara, Knox and Vivienne. I don’t know where the older boys were – they’re probably at that age where their mom and their younger siblings are totally NOT COOL. Angelina took the kids to LegoLand, Berkelow Books and then the group went to Bondi Beach for some grocery shopping, according to the photo agency. A few things about these photos:

*It’s crazy to me how much Knox looks like a little Shiloh, or Shiloh looks like a bigger Knox. They have the same haircut and it looks like Knox wears Shiloh’s cast-offs!

*I think Shiloh’s haircut looks a lot like what Jennifer Lawrence is rocking these days. Right?

*Shiloh’s Chucks = amazing.

*Vivienne is such a little princess with her long blonde hair and her “Mama didn’t let me wear pink today!!” expression.

*Vivienne isn’t allowed to have shoelaces?

*Zahara is so gorgeous. But look at how Shiloh has gotten so much taller than Z! Z is always going to be petite, isn’t she? Z’s more than a year older than Shiloh and by the time they’re adults, I bet Shiloh towers over Z by more than seven inches.

*I am an adult woman and I always want to wear whatever Zahara is wearing. Take note, people. We’re going to be wearing a lot of pink shorts, fuchsia-and-animal-print high-tops and white t-shirts with heart-shape prints.

*Is Angelina wearing a bra? I think she is. The pants are fine but that grey tank is awful. She’s also developed a real problem with those baby-wedges.

109974PCN_Jolie06

109974PCN_Jolie16

Angelina Jolie and her kids spend a day out shopping at Rose Bay in Sydney

109974PCN_Jolie55

Photos courtesy of Pacific Coast News.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

132 Responses to “Angelina Jolie takes Zahara, Shiloh, Vivienne & Knox shopping in Sydney: so cute?”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Maya says:

    They all look gorgeous and each has their own individual style.

    Angelina is slowly gaining weight which is evident on her face – it looks fuller these days.

  2. ANDREA1 says:

    Brad flew into Australia last week thursday not a few days ago
    http://www.justjared.com/photo-gallery/3006749/angelina-jolie-goes-book-shopping-with-the-kids-in-sydney-16/.From/?__nored=1 this picture of shiloh and Z is So adorable and Shiloh totally has Angie’s nose and lips!
    http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-Fpl3Q96Dl9o/UqNfpfz10zI/AAAAAAABTwM/uiuW4KVuGJs/s1600/Angelina-Jolie-and-kids-2902453.jpgBEAUTIFUL Angie totally has great skin and she takes care of it.
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2520173/Angelina-Jolie-daughter-Vivienne-wear-matching-skinny-jeans-flats-family-day-The-Lion-King-Sydney.html these are more pictures of Angie and the kids when they went to see lion King later on.
    I love totally love this family. Adorable and well behaved kids and committed and loving parents! 😉 🙂 !!! And oh she is wearing a bra…

    • Anon says:

      @ANDREA1″ saysthese are more pictures of Angie and the kids when they went to see lion King later on.
      I love totally love this family. Adorable and well behaved kids and committed and loving parents! 😉 :)”
      🙂 Thanks for posting the links, the children are growing up lovely good to them.
      ETA Angelina looks good

    • Emma - the JP Lover says:

      @Andrea1, who wrote: “… adorable and Shiloh totally has Angie’s nose and lips!”

      All three of their biological kids have Angie’s lips and nose. Remember those baby photos? Google a photo of Angie as a baby and you’ll swear you’re looking at a picture of shiloh, Knox, or Vivienne. 🙂

    • ANDREA1 says:

      @Anon since you love to see pictures of this family I have some more for you http://thejoliepittfamily.forumotion.com/t366p300-news-pics-and-more
      @Emma the jp lover I checked out angie’s pictures as a baby yes! You were right all 3 of them look like baby Angie. 🙂

      • Anon says:

        @ANDREA1 says
        Those were great, I love Zahara’s integrity if she sees the paps they are zapped. I like what Angelina Vivienne are wearing.
        Thank you 🙂

  3. Camille says:

    They are so fake. I can’t stand them.

    • Virgilia Coriolanus says:

      You don’t have to like them, but I fail to see how you can find something fake in a few pictures of a mom and her kids, walking around.

      • emmie_a says:

        Actors use their kids a lot of times for good press (Ben Affleck!) so I can sort of see where Camille is coming from… although I sort of like Angelina, I know she plays the game.

      • Lopusta says:

        Am with you VC

      • Virgilia Coriolanus says:

        Well I get that you have to sometimes–but there’s a difference between being pictured almost every day, especially doing rather mundane things (like the Afflecks) and being pictured once in a while. They’ve been in Australia since the beginning of September, and I think I’ve seen maybe 4 sets of pictures of them.

        I do think that they sometimes just don’t avoid the paps–but I’ve never thought that they weren’t famous enough, that they *had* to call the paps–for a lot of celebs it’s a matter of ‘do I want to avoid the paps today’, imo, at least.

      • LoLoLoLoL says:

        Perhaps Camille was talking about the yacht photos. Obviously staged for pitt to have good daddy photo-op before the media went tom cruise on him. “He abandoned his children for a movie!” Plus, star magazine had him on the cover as a cheater. So yes, the yacht photos are obvs staged and fake. Sadly, he had no real interaction with the children. Angelina on the other hand is getting all the attention from the kids. You can’t force the kids to look that way for a photo-op. They obviously adore their mother.

      • Lopusta says:

        @ LoLoLoL or LoL guessing its the same person Wow! Brad had the twins with him after him and Angie met up in hong kong! After two weeks he returned them to their mummy in Australia and took the 4older kids with him back to the Uk who were with him for over 4 weeks I know this because there were sitings of him and the kids in london. He took the kids back to australia last week thursday. That is hardly abandonment. So you mean they arranged a photo op on the yatch becos they knew star was going to publish that they were having a rift wow just wow! I get it that some of you don’t like them as a couple or a family but at least try to be factual. Don’t lie or spin things. End of rant 🙂

      • Kim1 says:

        Poor LOL if the yacht pics were staged than AJ is just as responsible as Brad.So the disdain you have Pitt should include Angie.BTW the yacht pics were taken a week before Star BS story.FYI Brad had the twins for three and a half weeks.He had the four older kids for four weeks.They returned to Australia last week.So if abadoned his kids so did Angie since they each had either the twins or older kids for the last two months since Hong Kong trip when Brad took the twins.@LOL miss you @ JJ

        s

      • LoLoLoLoL says:

        Kim1, where did I say Angelina didn’t hold some responsibility? But the facts are the facts. Angelina has been out and about with her kids all over australia and she doesn’t have any cheating rumors floating around her head. So there is really no need for a family photo-op for her. Pitt on the other hand choice to film a movie while Jolie is filming, hasn’t been photographed with his family & has cheating rumors. Similar to angelina releasing her double mastectomy news right when Pittstain needed publicity for his movie angelina participated in the yacht photo-op for him.

        If he did have the kids it explains why they are so clingy to angelina in recent photos. The last photos I saw her daughter was hugging her neck and now the yacht photos show the kids interacting mostly with Jolie. Never see the kids hugging him. Like I said her kids obviously Adore her. Oh well, I’m sure you’ll have an explanation for that too, kimmy.

      • Jana says:

        Whamo take a hike.

      • lovegossipbutnotL&E says:

        @lolololol, or whatever. I haven’t seen all the pictures but it seems one of your main complaints is that the kids are paying more attention to Angelina while Brad is taking pictures. Ummm, that’s because he is BEHIND the camera? Kinda hard to have the kids hanging all over him while he takes picts….. I don’t have one feeling more for any of the people in this group (talking adults here), but even I can see you’re making a silly observation. =-O

      • Kim1 says:

        Unbroken was scheduled to began end of December for some reason schedule was changed.They are still casting roles for Unbroken.So Unbroken is the reason the family is not together not Fury @LOL

      • Emma - the JP Lover says:

        @Lopusta, who wrote: “I get it that some of you don’t like them as a couple or a family but at least try to be factual. Don’t lie or spin things. End of rant.”

        But that’s the problem … they are ‘never’ factual, and they will ‘ignore’ facts just to hate. They deliberately ignore facts here when they’re posted, either by the writers at ‘Celebitchy’ or us. Have you ever noticed? Someone will post something here with ‘links’ to articles supporting the ‘facts’ they’ve stated, and two posts later you’ll find a post stating the same old lies and jaded opinions, none of which are supported by facts, as if links to the truth of the matter were never posted.

        Jen-Hens only have their hate and opinions to go on, and they resent us for being able to support what we say with ‘facts.’ So they ‘lie’ and ‘spin’ out of spite.

    • Janet says:

      She looks relaxed and content and she doesn’t look anything like a woman in a strained or unhappy relationship.

  4. eliza says:

    Such a beautiful woman but her weight is so unattractive.

    The kds are getting so big. How time flies.

    • Nessa says:

      ITA, if she gained a little bit I weight, she would be absolutely perffffffect. Her face is truly stunning.

      She seems like a really hands on mom, too. I mean, I know they play the Hollywood game (just as well as anyone out there), but they seem like a genuinely loving family. So, that’s something!

      • eliza says:

        She looked stunning during her Tomb Raider and Mrs.Smith days. She was thin but not skeletal. I am sure she is busy and that is part of her thiness problem but 10 lbs would be fantastic on her.

        I do not dislike them as a family. The kids are always doing something with one or both parents and seem to be happy. That is how it should be.

  5. GeeMoney says:

    Awwww, they are all so cute! And so big.

    Even though I wish Angelina would gain a little weight, I still love her.

    • Virgilia Coriolanus says:

      I think she will–she’s nearly 40. Look at her mom. Her mom was the same (as was her dad)–a beanpole. As she got older, she filled out–her mom looked really good. If I hadn’t known any better, I would’ve thought that she was in her early forties–not her fifties. But Angelina’s weight looks a lot more extreme because her face used to be fuller, and she had an extra ten pounds that softened her arms up.

      • cs says:

        Why do we keep comparing a 23-25 year old Angie to a 38 year old Angie with six kids? I’m more concerned about Melissa McCarthy obesity with such young children.

      • mayamae says:

        Why does poor Melissa McCarthy have to get attacked every time someone mentions Angie’s thin? Has Melissa attacked Angie’s body in any way? I don’t understand it. But, I do remember someone here mentioning they would get back at the Angie “haters” by attacking Melissa McCarthy at every opportunity. How the two correspond in any rational mind is beyond me.

        I have been too thin, and I’ve needed to lose a few pounds. The only people who claim it’s just as painful to hear comments about being too thin as too fat – have never been both.

        There are thin people dropping dead every day from coronary artery disease. As far as we know, Angie’s cholesterol is off the charts, and Melissa’s is normal. Let’s not pretend a concern for Melissa’s children.

      • Nayru says:

        I have nothing against Angelina and also feel she has looked thin and frail these past 10 years. I am not just talking about her Tomb Raider days. True, it does seem that she has always had thin limbs, but she was naked in Gia and she looked less frail then. One factor could be the natural loss of fat that happen from the face with age.

        The point I want to make is there is something different about her looks that makes her seem thinner and I am not just talking about her Tom Raider shape.

      • bns says:

        @cs

        LOL @ you bringing up Melissa McCarthy. Being very overweight or very underweight are both equally unhealthy.

    • Lopusta says:

      @GeeMoney I love your comment.

      • GeeMoney says:

        Why thank you!

      • Lopusta says:

        Because in as much as you are worried about her weight and would love her to add some. You found a polite and genuine way to pass your comment across without using offensive words. Also you stated you love her regardless 🙂

      • Virgilia Coriolanus says:

        I’ve always loved Angelina, and I’ve always thought she was very skinny, and I’ve never wanted her body type i.e. tall, skinny, straight up and down–which is the exact opposite of my body. But I’ve also never really been worried about her health, because she has always been like that. As I said before, I know this girl from school–she’s my age. We’re the same height, and she MIGHT weight a hundred pounds. That’s a big might. Everything on her is thin and long. She doesn’t look unhealthy/sick NOW, but in 10 or 15 years, I can see people going up to her and telling her that she needs to eat. But I think her weight is a lot more noticeable because of 2 reasons–her face, which has always been full, has thinned out w/age, and she’s always had big boobs for her frame.

      • GeeMoney says:

        @Lopusta

        Honestly, I’m a die hard Angie fan, and have been since she did Tomb Raider (any woman who kicks butt on screen automatically becomes a favorite in my book). I could never say anything mean about her, lol.

        Besides, we all know that in H-town being thin is necessary. I can’t give her too much flak for her weight, b/c we all know how hard it is to function and survive out there.

  6. Rhiley says:

    I always love pictures of this family. They are so beautiful and such a tight knit bunch.

    • Sullivan says:

      They do seem tight-knit. A big, loving family yet each individual is allowed, even encouraged, to be true to him/her self.

      • Maya says:

        Sorry for asking but are you a man or a woman?

        You always write nice comments without actually being rude and we all know that we women likes to be mean – hence the reason for me asking.

      • Holly says:

        I think they are very tight knit, but I get irked when people comment on their individual styles. Do people really think that the kids, especially the younger ones, are picking out coordinating black and white outfits for themselves? As someone with a young son, I’m still completely in charge of his clothing and of course, that means I’m completely in charge of his ‘style’. He’s not exactly clothes shopping online and putting together a ‘look’ for himself.

        That being said, Zahara is a bit older and obviously gravitates towards incredibly short shorts and animal prints.

      • Samtha says:

        @Holly, it depends on the kid! My stepdaughter has been picking out her own clothes since about age five, and started putting together her own outfits around seven or eight.

      • Holly says:

        I totally get that, Samantha, but the kids have each been rocking the exact same ‘individual styles’ since they were toddlers.

      • mayamae says:

        Holly,

        I’m not sure if you mean to criticize Zahara’s “incredibly short shorts”. But, I have a little cousin who is similar in body shape. She’s a little bean pole, but tall. She has to wear pants for a much younger child or they fall off, even with a belt. That means that shorts tend to be shorter on her.

  7. Cool Phosphorescent Shimmer says:

    Shiloh, Knox, and Vivienne all look SO much alike. Very cute.

  8. tifzlan says:

    I just love their kids so much. Brings so much joy to me, seeing them all holding hands and taking care of each other.

  9. Downton fan says:

    Did y’all notice Knox’s nails? I wonder if his sister’s decided to paint their lil bro’s nails or if he asked for it to be cool?

    • Kim1 says:

      Pax and Maddox have worned nail polish also Pax this year I think it was black.There are pics of Maddox getting a mani with his cousins last year.

  10. Esmom says:

    Adorable family. As for Viv’s shoes, I doubt that she’s not allowed laces, it’s just the style of shoe. Much easier for little kids to slip on and off.

    • ozmom says:

      Thx, esmom, for stating the obvious. The comment that V isn’t allowed to have laces is just stupid. Obviously the shoes were made without laces.

  11. Gossy says:

    I don’t think Zahara will be short….Shiloh is probably just tall since Angelina is 5’8 and Brad is 5’11 (which is above average for both men and women). Zee will probably be 5’5 or something.

    • Tiffany says:

      When Zahara was brought home she had some health problems that required surgery. I remember AJ and the doctor who helped her ( I cannot remember her name) speaking about it and one of issues Zahara could having a stunt in her growth.

      • gennline says:

        She never needed surgery, she had an infection. She likely also had ricketts as a baby, as her legs were quite bowed but she never needed surgery for that either.With good care her legs straightened out. AJ has gone on record to say that she never needed surgery for her health problems as a baby.

      • Virgilia Coriolanus says:

        She had rickets or something like that. Plus they weren’t sure if she had AIDS or not–Brad and Angelina didn’t get her tested until after they brought her home, to the US.

  12. Ai says:

    Re Knox’s nails… Kids that age could be into anything their peers are into. He could just have been playing with his sisters.

    Not anyone here yet but I saw these photos elsewhere; It scares me that some posters are making a big deal in a negative way out of the nail polish on Knox or that Shiloh is a tomboy.

    • tifzlan says:

      I didn’t even notice his nails and that’s so adorable! Especially considering the fact that his brothers are slightly older than him and he’s probably around his sisters a lot. That shows to me that the girls include him in whatever they do, which is awesome!

      People making a big deal about Knox’ painted nails or Shiloh’s style are so pressed. Grown men paint their nails all the time! Rockstars, anyone? And plenty of little girls were tomboys growing up. It really means NOTHING at all. I know lots of girls who grew up as tomboys and they are now some of the girliest girls i know.

      • pwal says:

        It’s possible that his sisters ganged up and the result was painted nails, but then again, Maddox and Pax rocked painted nails at one point. I remember some uproar when Pax rocked gold and black (?) nails a year or two ago,

        Although it would be sweet if he did let his sisters paint his nails and he didn’t protest. It reminds me of his aunt Julie saying that Brad allowed her daughters to do things like that to him (although I think they focused on the long hair he was wearing at the time).

      • bbb1975 says:

        My youngest son loved to have his nails painted when he was little, I was a stay at home mom and he has two older sisters. He was around females all day long, and really liked to copy us. He wanted to be included and we liked to include him. He eventually our grew it, but the memories make our family smile.
        I’m sure in a few years Knox will out grow it too, and if he doesn’t? Who Cares!!??

      • Lara says:

        I remember once painting my nails and my little brother was watching me (there’s a 20 year gap) and asked if I could paint his toenails. I said sure go and get the black (so he could be a pirate) but he wanted the pink…

      • tifzlan says:

        pawl, I’m not going to shade his sisters ganging up on him because that’s the normal interaction siblings have with each other sometimes. I’m sure his brothers love to play football (or whatever) with him too. It’s just that Maddox and Pax are slightly older than Knox and are usually absent from the huge family outings Mama Jolie takes the younger ones on. My youngest sister is 4 and obsessed with makeup. She frequently uses my father to experiment on and it is just the most adorable thing!

        bbb1975, who cares is absolutely right! I like that the Jolie-Pitts allow their children freedom to discover themselves on their own. Whether they grow out of it or not is secondary.

        Lara, that’s really cute! Little children are so adorable. My sisters are the same way.

      • Amy Tennant says:

        I remember painting my daughter’s toenails when she was little, and her little brother toddling up and sitting beside her and putting his feet out to be next. It was so sweet,

    • LadySlippers says:

      My son ADORED getting his nails painted for quite some time. He preferred bright colours — the brighter the better! His favourite was fire engine red.

      I think people overreact to boys and girls doing things normally associated with the opposite gender. Most of the time it’s harmless and part of the normal developmental process of growing up. Besides, no one person is ‘purely’ feminine or ‘purely’ masculine, we all have a mix of both. We should embrace both and enjoy and celebrate diversity.

  13. Audrey says:

    Omg the attitude on Z!

    • Observer says:

      Stop.

    • Stef Leppard says:

      Zahara is so boss.

    • zut alors! says:

      You mean the attitude you’re projecting on her? No, I don’t see it.

    • mayamae says:

      Why is this assumed to be an attack on Zahara? Kaiser herself referred to Zahara as Empress Z, who wanted to rule the world and boss her siblings, for years.

      • Observer says:

        I do have a problem with adults projecting sh*t onto a child. She has a neutral facial expression and she is automatically assumed to have an ‘attitude’ or she is ‘angry’.
        I also do find it problematic that words like Empress and carer of her siblings /boss lady are used whenever she holds their hands.
        She is a child, let her be one.
        To me she looks like a happy little girl who loves pink, to me she is a princess more than a frickin’ Empress-boss-lady (words that are always used to describe her, hmm wonder why). Why don’t you add ‘strong’ while you’re at it.
        Meanwhile Viv wears black clothes a lot and is called a ‘princess’.
        God, you’re transparent. At least own it.

      • lisa2 says:

        Angie said Zahara likes to be “mama” and tell everyone what to do. Every family has that particular child. I was that one in my family. I don’t have a problem with that. BUT I hate when people assume she is mean. I think she is a thoughtful child. And her expressions are mirrored on her face. It seems as she has gotten older she finds the people snapping pictures a bit ridiculous and silly. Her facial expressions show that. She seems very protective of younger brother sister. I remember Brad saying she use to be scared of them, not I think she has gotten over that which is a good thing. They have very famous parents, and unfortunately the paps and people with phones is a part of that reality.. Good or Bad; they are going to have to learn to handle it.

  14. lady mary. says:

    Angie and her kids look lovely ,healthy .i love this family ,but Zahara is my favourite ,she seems so responsible and caring

    • Anon says:

      @lady mary
      agree and like your description of Zahara as responsible and caring, she’s the big sister who is protective of her family. its nice to see.

  15. Anna Moon 85 says:

    Angelina’s looking like she’s gained a little weight, which is fantastic IMO. Her arms are still so thin, but I’ve noticed that from even when she was younger she always had very skinny arms…just her body type. Anyway, she’s looking healthy. All of the kids are adorable. I’m always shocked when I see Maddox with her, he’s gotten so tall…there were photos of them on another site.

    • Camille (TheOriginal) says:

      Agree with everything you said. She does look a little fuller, you can see it in her face as well.

    • TC says:

      Yes, Angie’s always had thin arms. Even during her Tomb Raider days when she was at a higher weight, her arms and legs were thin. Same as her mom. It’s genetic. Here’s an image of Angie’s mom, Macheline Bertrand, holding a young Angie. Her arms are identical in thinness and shape to Angie’s. When Angie gains weight, she gains it in her face and around her middle.

      http://lesbeehive.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/bPBkL3S.jpg

  16. Renee says:

    Um, in the top pic Zahara looks like Angelina!!!

  17. freya7 says:

    It was Pax’s 10th birthday- Pax has had more than one birthday on a boat, but usually they are in a place that is too cold to spend much time above deck. This is also the exact same boat that Brad and Pax went on when Brad was promoting WWZ in Australia. It’s hard to take a boat excursion without bring exposed to the public, but there are those who think everything Brad & Angie do is pure evil regardless, so enjoy your evil thoughts.

  18. Patricia says:

    I really, really, really wish you would not comment on her breasts, whether or not she wears a bra, etc. as the daughter of a breast cancer survivor it just pains me.

    • AlmondJoy says:

      @Patricia I can definitely understand that it’s painful for you to read. I’m so sorry about your daughter. Sending you my thoughts, prayers and love ♥

    • Sloane Wyatt says:

      Yeah. For all the vaunted proclamations on this site against body and weight shaming, there seems to be no hesitation about publishing numerous stories about the minute vagaries of Angelina’s prosthetic breasts.

    • Lucinda says:

      I just hoped that if she was not wearing a bra because it was painful, that perhaps wearing a bra meant she was more comfortable now. So I was glad it was pointed out because it might be a sign her body is healing which would be wonderful. While there are certainly a lot of unkind comments, I think there are also many people here who express genuine concern. Since we don’t know her personally, the only information we can often gather is based on body presentation and body language. Superficial of course, but the nature of the beast.

    • maggie says:

      Patricia with all due respect if you don’t want to read comments about her breasts I would suggest not visiting an angelina thread on celebitchy. If you think I’m not sympathetic….my mother is no longer alive.

      • Patricia says:

        Maggie I like to read about Angelina because she is a humanitarian, an interesting actress and director, and a mother. It is painful to see someone with so many great attributes having her breasts scrutinized after a life saving surgery. I love this site, personally I think this site is better than that and should remember that it is better than that…

    • mayamae says:

      While Angelina has gone through a lot of pain and suffering post-mastectomy and reconstructiive surgery, I think the fact that she did not have breast cancer gets lost. She did preventative surgery because of a high likelihood she would develop breast cancer – but it is not the same. My best friend/cousin has breast cancer. Besides the actual mastectomy and reconstruction, she endured chemotherapy, multiple surgeries to implant and remove a central venous port, will take Topamax daily for the next five years, and lives day in and day out with the fear that her cancer will re-occur. Her story is sadder with the knowledge that she prolonged treatment due to lack of health care, and what should have been a lumpectomy became a full bilateral mastectomy.

      I’d like to give a shout out to Susan G. Komen, who paid for the genetic testing my cousin could not afford, so she could learn that she does not have the gene to pass along to her two daughters.

      To make it clear – I DO NOT thing Angie plays on this misunderstanding. She has made it very clear and has allowed her doctor to make it very clear that she did not have breast cancer.

      Although it may be very insensitive to constantly reference her nipples, I think it’s part of the educational process. Angie’s “live nipples” is a newer and expensive procedure, as well as difficult. Many women, like my cousin, have false tatooed nipples, and may now question this choice. As the most publicly representative woman of this procedure, we are learning through Angie some things that most doctor’s probably don’t take the time to explain. When I first learned of her procedure, it seemed like the better alternative by far. At least now women, many of us tired of our breasts getting the constant attention already, are aware of the potential of large, prominent nipples. It may sound trivial, but perhaps Angie has accepted this as part of her attempt to educate the public on her journey.

      My apologies if I sound overly clinical, I’m a nurse and it’s second nature.

      • CuriousCole says:

        We need more people like you on internet comment threads 🙂 Putting a clinical stop to speculative hate and snapping people back into reality in the nicest way possible, thank you. I hope your cousin remains in remission.

      • Sloane Wyatt says:

        Fascinating!

  19. lisa2 says:

    I thought these were pics of the at the Lion King. but they are of the other day. There are new pics of Angie with 5 of the kids at a Sunday show of The Lion King..

    Why is it that we can see every other celeb out with there kids and nobody says a thing. But Brad/Angie out with their kids is a photo op. BUT if we never see the kids then it is those poor kids don’t get to do what other kids do. Seriously.

    Those children look well behaved and having fun. OH wait I forgot they are terrible and uncontrollable . Even though we have never seen them act that way.

    the children look happy and enjoying the time with their mother. But I guess that is the problem. They look fine and are enjoying time with their mother. Goes against the script that people have about this family.

    • Maya says:

      Personally I think the haters just want to hate – it’s doesn’t matter what it is – as long as it’s something to do with the Jolie-Pitts they will attack. Never mind that they are wrong on most counts.

      It’s mostly Jennifer Aniston fans who attack the JPs (I have seen the same people who hates on JPs – fawn over Jennifer). They just cannot handle the fact that the relationship they predicted & prayed will only last a few months because it was apparently based on lust – in now into its 8th year and going from strength to strength.

      So since JPs are still together – they have started to attack the children and the way they are dressed etc. Children are off limits and any decent human being will never even think bad about children never mind attack them this viciously (then again their idol is all for attacking children since she gets her BFF to do that). Attacks Angelina & Brad on their looks – never mind that she cannot wear a bra most likely due to the mastectomy (Jennifer has not worn a bra the last two decades and is nicknamed Nippleston but that’s is fine according to the fans).

    • Emma - the JP Lover says:

      @Lisa2, who wrote: “Why is it that we can see every other celeb out with there kids and nobody says a thing. But Brad/Angie out with their kids is a photo op. BUT if we never see the kids then it is those poor kids don’t get to do what other kids do. Seriously.”

      I know. I’ve been asking the exact same question for years. We see Reece Witherspoon, the Afflecks, and countless other celebrities out with their kids almost daily, but let one or two sets of pictures of the Jolie-Pitt children appear after a 6 or 7 month drought, and seeing the Jolie-Pitt kids is a ‘deliberate’ PR move/ploy/plot by Angie and Brad.

      • abby says:

        The difference are those celebs are liked, thanks to their public image. Angie is not, for various reasons even pre-Brad/BBT. Even the Afflecks, who are called out mind you, are not done so with such vile and invective thrown at them. Never mind Jennifer Garner’s questionable personal history (Foley, Vartan, Affleck), the point is those men were dull, minor celebs, uninteresting and none was married to America’s Sweetheart. In fact, Jenn G is one of America’s Sweethearts, so like Julia, she can get away with anything. Just like Reese. Flash a bright smile (and dimples in Garner’s case), wear some All-American outifit – red, white and blue, maybe a baseball cap/cowboy hat, walk around with the baby/kids. All is forgiven.
        Aniston plays on her Rachel Green/flakey persona (a character she plays repeatedly in film) so people tend to think she’s as clueless and harmless as Rachel supposedly was. But yeah, you don’t thrive in Hollywood as long as she has by being clueless. So just as I am willing to concede that the JPs play the game you can bet your a$$ that Aniston does too and she’s no novice either. But that Girl Next Door persona makes her teflon.

        It’s not what you do apparently, but who you do it to and – how public it is.

        The hypocrisy is astounding.

        btw, I deeply apologize for that LAP above. I didn’t realize how long it was. oops.

  20. Sloane Wyatt says:

    Shiloh looks like a young Brienne from ‘Game of Thrones’! http://gameofthrones.wikia.com/wiki/Brienne_of_Tarth

    This is one photogenic family.

    • Julianna says:

      I think she looks exactly like a young Emma Rigby who plays the Red Queen in Once Upon a Time in Wonderland.
      http://www.imdb.com/media/rm3777879296/nm2050746?ref_=nm_phs_md_4

    • Virgilia Coriolanus says:

      Sloane what’s rather ironic is that a month or so ago, I was looking through this gossip blog to see if they had any posts on Angelina when she was pregnant w/Shiloh (just curious)—I found this post that was made in late December 2005, when the rumors that she was pregnant were really strong. In the post, the pics of Angelina were with her having a little food baby. But the funny thing was that almost all the comments were about how (beyond accusations of homewrecking and the pics of her stomach were photoshopped) Brad and Angelina’s kids were going to be these weird, ugly looking kids. Bruce Willis/Demi Moore were brought up–and one really bitchy comment was this: “Bruce Willis is supposed to be good looking?!” (which for the record, I think he’s like Russell Crowe, in thinking that he’s the hot shit, and sooo handsome–NO)….hilarious.

      Oh and I left a very looong, Virgilia like post on the other thread–where you asked how old I was.

      • Sloane Wyatt says:

        Happy Birthday, Virgilia!

        I read your comment on the ‘Brad Pitt: Canoodled’ story, and I know where you’re coming from. My opinions change and evolve as new gossip comes on the horizon, so although I find drinkin’, tannin’, vacaying’ Jen pretty harmless, she’s a mite hypocritical on the cheating thing.

        Life’s mostly grey areas, but knowing Angie’s predilection for meetups in hotel rooms I still believe she and Brad got it on while still married to Jennifer. Who can forget these two’s overly compensating standing apart photos during the publicity of ‘Mr. and Mrs. Smith’? – http://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/angelina-jolie-and-brad-pitt-during-showest-2005-20th-news-photo/105734774

      • Virgilia Coriolanus says:

        Well, as I get older and more experienced, my opinion might change. Who knows? But for now, I still stand by it. Check out Jennifer’s Vogue 2008 article–notice how she talks about Brad vs. Angelina–that’s what did it for me. Because even if they were absolutely sleeping together–that wasn’t what Jennifer was angry about. And that’s what gets me.
        http://www.vogue.com/magazine/article/jennifer-aniston-prime-time/

        And I LOVE that maxi dress that she’s wearing!

        But, again, I am more about how you deal w/the fallout. Like the cousin I was talking about–his wife asked him why he didn’t ever stay home w/his family, why he always had to go out (to the clubs, basically to get a new sidepiece). You know what he said to her? He said “You weren’t saying that when I was married to my first wife”. I died laughing when my mom told me that. She can’t even be mad–she dated a married guy for eight years, married him, and then didn’t expect the same thing to happen to her.

        Regarding the pic–I think they were just trying not to fan the rumors. At that point, they couldn’t win. If they were near each other, or he had an arm around her–then people would say that they were def. screwing around. Its the same the other way. But I love that he’s got his hands in his pockets and she’s got her arms behind her back. I think they were trying to be respectful to Jennifer–because they were a couple at that point, even though they didn’t talk about it.

        I read a lot (read as: ALL) of the older posts of the Unholy Triangle (because I am a loser with a lot of free time), and one comment that stuck out to me was that someone said that they saw Jennifer on Oprah. And basically Jennifer said she was mad because there wasn’t an “insufficient mourning time” i.e. she wanted Brad and Angelina to wait to go public w/their relationship–that plan was shot to hell w/those beach pics.

  21. JudyK says:

    Totally disagree w/ Camille. Angie is a woman who truly loves and enjoys being WITH her kids, and it shines through in every pic I’ve ever seen of them. Think she’s a GREAT Mom.

    • Camille (TheOriginal) says:

      I really wish that that trolling person that calls itself ‘Camille’ would change its name…

  22. DreamyK says:

    Vivienne looks like a worrier. More often than not she has that concerned look on her face. Beautiful family. I always enjoy seeing pictures of them.

    • Samtha says:

      It seems like maybe she just doesn’t like the paps. In those pictures of the family on the yacht, she’s smiling in a lot of them.

      • mayamae says:

        I think Maddox and Pax respond to the paps as well by not smiling. Maddox has always been my favorite, so I’m happy to see the rare photo where he’s smiling.

  23. Holly says:

    I know the grey tank is a bit sloppy looking, but I still love that she isn’t wearing all black. I’ll take it.

    • lisa2 says:

      hahaha..

      I think that is Brad’s tank. She does that sometimes. She will wear one of his shirts..

    • ANDREA1 says:

      Yea! Its good to mix colours at least for a change 🙂

    • Santolina says:

      Me, too. The gray looks much better on her than black, which I think is much too severe for her. She was a blonde, blue-eyed child and although her hair has darkened, she’ll always look much better in softer colors.

  24. MrsBPitt says:

    The pics on the yacht are great! Shiloh and Knox were having a great time paddle boarding and Zahara and Viv were having a super time together, watching them and laughing! Did anyone notice how awesome my man, Brad, looked…his body was smokin!!! Well, from the black socks up, anyway!!!

    • Blood&Sand says:

      +10000

      PS: loved the black socks comment. Real men don’t care what the fashion police think of their footwear, Brad had work to do dangling all over that boat recording family pictures.

  25. Gossipfun says:

    Viv is totally Mummy’s girl.

  26. Maria says:

    They are a lovely looking family.

    These threads are always so unnerving: the ugliness and over investment is on BOTH sides.

  27. phlyfiremama says:

    Empress Z! Tres magnifique!!!

  28. Camille (TheOriginal) says:

    Seriously gorgeous family. Love the outfits too, cute.

  29. Zigggy says:

    I love how unfashionable Angelina is. She likes what she likes and doesn’t follow trends 🙂

    • Virgilia Coriolanus says:

      I’m the exact same way, so I can’t even trash talk her. I wear jeans and a sweatshirt almost every day. If I want to get dressy–which honestly depends on my mood—then I’ll wear a nice shirt, or I’ll wear a maxi dress. Other than that, I look the same.

      As for Angelina, it’s not even that I think what she wears is horrible, its just that it looks worse than it is because usually it’s all in black. Although I do love to snark on her shoes. I do LOVE that she’s starting to wear those black suit pants w/a tank top–I like her in a good tailored suit.

  30. xboxsucks says:

    these pics melt my black heart,the kids are really cute!

  31. CuriousCole says:

    I did a double-take when I saw Angie wasn’t head-to-toe in black, such a nice change! I find Zahara’s protectiveness so sweet. She’s always got a hold of a younger sibling, looks like a very good big sister. I do feel sorry for the kids though – even if they escape the paparazzi when they go out, look at the number of camera phones pointed their direction! That would rankle me but Angelina looks so peaceful all the time. I don’t know how she does it.

  32. Rena says:

    Cute always well behaved kids in public surrounded by paps and the public with an loving calm attentive mother they are all very close to. I think it is the calmness exhibited by both Angelina and Brad that the kids mimic. The kids are growing so fast, no little babies anymore. Demonstrates the passage of time.

  33. shump says:

    I am 99% sure those are the little slip on plimsole type shoes that have elastic instead of shoelaces. So they look like you are going lace-less. They’re brilliant for kids because they’re easy on and off.

  34. Amy Tennant says:

    What a beautiful family, and the kids are so well-behaved! I can’t wait to see what they’re like when they grow up! I think they’ve been taught well to hold each other’s hands to stay together, look out for each other and not get lost. I’m sure they have a lot of help from nannies or bodyguards, but that’s a big family to keep track of in any case, and I can imagine there’s a worry and danger of kidnap threat with a family as well-known as this (and from REAL stalkers, not just those of us who play them on gossip blog message boards). I think being raised as they have been, they’ve become a tight-knit little clan who rely on each other and take care of each other. They seem well-mannered too. I hope their bonds last a lifetime, and I hope they avoid the pitfalls that other celeb kids fall into. I think they will. I think the way Brad and Angie are letting each kid express his or her individuality is key–maybe they won’t feel a need to rebel so much.

    Each child is so beautiful. I *really* want to see what Shiloh looks like when she grows up! I think Viv’s adorable little worry expression may just be her face in repose. Z is a stunner. Knox is a heartbreaker. And the older boys are handsome, too.

  35. Carolyn says:

    Very nice. All look relaxed and happy. Sydney seems to agree with the family.

  36. Dibba says:

    Photos on boat are funny. I can’t get over how many helpers they have. Congrats to us for doing it without helpers! Even with all the staff they look overwhelmed!

  37. aasf says:

    I do feel like Brad really doesn’t seem to be spending enough time with his family. What do you guys think. I am forever fascinated with this family.