Star: The Jolie-Pitt kids’ education is crazy, they don’t take tests or do homework

star brangelina

Over the years, the tabloids have tried to make Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt sound like terrible parents. At this point, I don’t really believe it. I think they’re probably as hands-on as they can be with two competing careers, and I think they have tons of nannies, helpers, tutors, private teachers and others to help them along the way. One thing I’ve always believed is that Angelina is the disciplinarian, and she’s the one organizing the family. That’s my assumption, but Star Magazine claims she’s a “hippie” who doesn’t believe in “rules.” Eh. Doubtful.

Three former nannies who worked for the Jolie-Pitts is filling Star in on the startling details of their mysterious universe—a rarefied world of security guards and nannies and nothing that other kids have: no friends, no school, no rules. While Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie themselves have enjoyed wondrous experiences few could imagine, their children—Maddox, 14, Pax, 11, Zahara, 10, Shiloh, 9, and 7-year-old twins Knox and Vivienne—may have the most unique lives of all.

“Brad and Angie are very unconventional parents, to say the least,” one nanny said. “It’s like they’re living in a hippie commune most of the time, because Angie doesn’t believe in rules. She thinks it’s important for their children to have freedom of expression, but that doesn’t always work out well,” the tipster said. Perhaps the most clear-cut example of Angelina’s “anything goes” parenting style is the fact that the children don’t go to traditional school.

They used to attend the Lycee Francais—a French-language school with campuses all over the world, so students can continue their lessons while traveling—but they eventually dropped out. Now, the kids are homeschooled by a team of international teachers.

Angelina refuses to impose any structure on their studies, according to one of the nannies. “She lets the kids learn what they want and ignore the stuff that doesn’t interest them,” dished the source. “And they don’t take tests or do homework.” Adds a nanny, “Let’s face it, none of those kids will ever be going after low-level jobs, so it’s not like they need a formal education the way other kids would.”

Even access to the Internet is largely unrestricted in the Jolie-Pitt household. “The kids are allowed to browse the Net as much as they like, and the older ones use social media, though their security team monitors it for their own safety,” the source revealed. “They’ve even seen some of their parents’ R-rated movies, like Fight Club and Inglourious Basterds—and Mr. & Mrs. Smith! It was weird for them to see their parents acting sexy onscreen in that, but they loved it.”

[From Star Magazine]

Gasp, children watching R-rated movies! My parents let me watch everything when I was little too, which probably instilled a love of movies from an early age. I doubt the little ones understand Fight Club, but I bet Maddox and Pax like it.

As for not even giving the kids tests… well, you know how I feel about that. I side-eye the hell out of these actors deciding that their kids should only learn about artsy-fartsy stuff. Kids that age are little sponges and they need to be exposed to everything, from math, science, technology, art, literature, history and everything else. I get that Brad and Angelina are trying to give their kids the childhoods they never had, but I do think most kids thrive with stability, a reliable school schedule, etc.

brange3

brange1

Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet, Pacific Coast News.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

136 Responses to “Star: The Jolie-Pitt kids’ education is crazy, they don’t take tests or do homework”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Sabrine says:

    Oh I’m sure in their world the little darlings will be sufficiently educated. They won’t be scrapping for a meal any time soon.

    • V4Real says:

      Don’t employees or former employees have to sign some kind of confidential agreement that prohibits them from speaking about their former employer.

      I’m sure they have tutors.

      • CORAL says:

        Yes, they do (sign NDAs) – that means if this were real, they’d be sued, and at the very least never work again.

        Reality check: This is STAR magazine. The same publication that has Aniston with 3 sets of twins, from John Mayer, Vince Vaughn, and whatshisface.

        From the excerpt it appears the nannies names are: Ms. ‘One Nanny’ and Ms. ‘Another Source.’

        As in ‘one nanny says….and another source says..’

        Yea. Mmmkay Star. Get back with me when these kids inevitably ace their SATs, and ACTs and are attending some Ivy league w/bodyguards one day…I’m sure it will happen.

      • knower says:

        yea, legality nixes any possibility of truth to this story. these people get NDA’d up.

      • Pondering thoughts says:

        I am annoyed that it is legal to print such bu***ck*. Some people just won’t get it that it is probably all made up.

      • funcakes says:

        I no longer read the taloid magazines. The internet give news faster than publications. Hollywood stars have been pretty much exposing themselves lately. ( Ben Affleck, Gwen and Gavin, Leah and COS)

    • Jib says:

      I agree. They will never have to earn a living, which is a terrible thing to hand down to a child. If this story is true, this is really irresponsible of them. I would tend to agree that Angelina is a hippie and wants her kids to just “explore what they want in the world.” But I would think Brad is a bit more down to earth. Kids need to learn things like math and logic so that their brains develop – lots and lots of studies on this, folks. You can’t just learn some stuff and have a fully functioning brain.

      (And there have been many studies on how younger people will have as much greater percentage of dementia when they get older: because of all the time spent on computers, they are laying down fewer “tracks” in the brain than those of us who played outside, played board games, sang, danced, looked at dust motes, etc. Those extra tracks we older folks have can be used when others get blocked by things that happen as we age.)

      • Itsnotthatserious says:

        The irony is that you are writing about logic and developing brains about a tabloid story, ha!

      • Jib says:

        @itsnotthatserious, so what should I talk about? It is a conversation about education, so I think what I discussed is relevant.

      • monstergirl says:

        Jib–itsnot apparently doesn’t know the definition of irony. I wouldn’t be offended.

  2. RH says:

    I really like both of them. However, I’m not really shocked to read this.

    • CORAL says:

      I’m not shocked either, you know why…

      …because it’s STAR magazine.

      (Helloooo??!!)

    • Carmen says:

      Considering the “source” of this story, neither am I. However, I would bet my next paycheck it is 100% fabricated. Everybody who works for the Jolie-Pitts has to sign a confidentiality agreement. Anyone who breaks it will be sued out the wazoo. And believe me they have some very good lawyers. They successfully sued News Of The World for libel and won a very hefty settlement.

  3. Crocuta says:

    When I was a kid, my father would rent horror films a lot. The whole block of children gathered to watch them and nobody betted an eye. Different era?

    Could it be that they’re also homeschooling for safety reasons? I mean they’re the most well known couple with the most famous kids after the president, so I can imagine children being targeted by criminals all the time for ransom and similar crap.

    • CORAL. says:

      The reason I call bullshite is:

      1) it’s STAR magazine. Who’s written some of the most wild, vicious and unfair lies about them and many others, in the cesspool that is the tabloid industry…. and…

      2) We’ve seen clear evidence that the kids participate in organized team sports with other kids (older girls are in soccer). You can’t just show up one day and play, you have practice, training and your fitted with your uniforms. So the fact that they’re involved in ‘team,’ anything speaks to the lie that they have no structure. I’m also sure they have (gasp!!) ‘friends,’ on the team, and friends period. Maddox even has a ‘girlfriend,’ Angelina said. Did he create her out of thin air. That takes ‘some,’ socialization skills.

      Also, the fact that they’ve both given interviews and discussed the ‘structure,’ in their home with the children.

      Angelina and Brad both had structure educationally growing up, I’m sure they want nothing less for their kids.

    • Mimi says:

      Yeah, if there were ever children who needed to be home schooled, it’s the Jolie-Pitts. It’s very unfortunate, but that is the case here. I don’t blame Angie and Brad if they don’t feel comfortable sending their kids to a normal school. That being said, I do hope the children are receiving a proper education. Granted, they will never have to work a day in their lives, but they should still be able to read, write, and add and subtract.

      • Maria says:

        @ Coral.
        Angelina never attended university(Are you taking about NYU where she dropped out after 1 semester?) and Brad dropped out of his college too. That does not count as being university educated.

      • knower says:

        @Coral

        Both Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt are college dropouts.

        you aren’t ‘university educated’ if you didn’t graduate.

      • Catelina says:

        Maybe technically Brad is not ‘university educated’ but he was literally 2 weeks away from graduating when he dropped out to move to LA. The actual learning done over the course of four years means more than a piece of paper, no?

      • Bess says:

        THANKS @Catalina +1

        To @Maria and @knower —

        Geez.

        Hello?

        I don’t believe Coral said Brad and Angelina were degreed.

        However, they BOTH were accepted into university and attended/WERE ENROLLED, so they must have had pretty good grades/transcripts/SATs.

        As was pointed out, Brad was a senior in college, two wks from graduating, that’s nothing to sneeze at.

        I’m always amazed how the detractors know as much about their bios as the fans. Lol

        *Bringing you back to the point: I’m sure Brad and Angelina appreciate the benefits of education since they literally advocate for it around the world philanthropically, and were accepted and briefly attended university themselves before their careers took off.

        If you want to get mired in the muck of their exact amount of time spent enrolled in University before they became successful actors, that’s irrelevant and another topic altogether.

        But we are discussing all the reasons why a tabloid story is bs…the biggest and main one being…it’s a tabloid.

      • Jib says:

        @bess, Angelina had famous parents, so I don’t think her grades or SATs had anything to do with her college enrollment. I don’t even know where Brad went, so who knows how smart he is? Anyone can get into many schools.

      • geezlouise says:

        If Brad dropped out before graduation then he is a dropout. Close doesn’t count.

      • Catelina says:

        @Jib he went to the journalism school at Mizzou

  4. MoxyLady007 says:

    It sounds like unschooling but with the worlds best tutors and teachers. Not sure about all aspects of unschooling but I am deeply jealous of the educational resources they have at their disposal to teach their children. Can you imagine just being like – hmmmm. I want the best Montessori teacher in the world to come and work with my toddlers. Gah. Seething with envy.

    • GiGi says:

      I thought the same – they’re not having a public education as we know it, but rather a classical education. They’re traveling and learning and it sounds a lot like unschooling to me. They have tutors, so I’m sure they’re fine.

      • knower says:

        The traveling thing actually is what I think is pretty amazing as its own form of learning. That is a type of education all its own, if you know what I mean. Good to be opened up to the world that young.

    • phlyfiremama says:

      Seriously. Those kids are going to be so multi-faceted in their lives, it will be amazing. There will be none of the Smith kids bullcrap, because the Smith kids aren’t getting the rounded education the Jolie-Pitt kids are. There are MANY ways to learn, and sometimes being stuck in a classroom with too many rules and not enough action are the least effective~especially if the children are more advanced than their peers. NOTHING sucks worse than being dragged down to the lowest level of other students, when you are further ahead. I’m sure that there are a small army of tutors and that many of their household play multiple roles~they are probably ALL, in some capacity or another, teaching the children different things, so that those children are constantly picking up information from many different sources. This IS education, even if it isn’t in the “traditional” sense. Have you SEEN the quagmire of insanity that is common core? Craziness.

  5. MG says:

    They’re getting home schooled by a team of “International teachers” so I’m sure they are just fine. And I don’t believe the “no rules” thing. If that were true they probably wouldn’t be so well behaved in public.

    • Elisa the I. says:

      THIS! This story is BS.

    • Luca76 says:

      Yeah exactly I’m sure they have their moments like any kid but they are very well behaved.

    • Esmom says:

      Yes, I think that’s the point of hiring highly qualified professionals, to make sure they are learning what they should. I’m guessing they may emphasize the arts but I doubt they’re neglecting STEM type stuff. I think that while their lives may be unconventional that Brad and Angie would not want to deprive their kids of solid educations.

      • MrsBPitt says:

        Didn’t Angelina say in an interview within the last couple of years, that Maddox loves math and science? These children are getting the best education that money can buy! And good for them…maybe they will all grow up and become more than, actors, or models, or party animals. Perhaps, they will have the skills and desire to try and make a contribution to the world. I feel like this is what their parents are trying to instill in them…

    • Carol says:

      you know, I get the feeling if this was a story about Jennifer Aniston this site would be casting stones at “bad parenting.” Anyways, I’m sure the kids are getting a good but somewhat unconventional schooling.

  6. grabbyhands says:

    I’m taking it with a bit of grain of salt.

    I’ve never been a Brangelina fangirl (not an Aniston fan either), but neither of them seem to be intellectual lightweights, so I’m willing to bet it isn’t so much a case of “the kids get to stay up all night eating Cap’n Crunch and watching nothing but cartoons, and only read comic books” as their lesson plans, such as they are, are just probably really esoteric.

    We have had a lot of debate in recent years (in Seattle, anyway) about the constant testing that kids have to go through every year and if it is really having any other effect other than adding extra work and turning kids into rote memory machines rather than teaching them anything. With that and the knowledge that American kids keep falling farther and farther behind in all categories academically, coupled with a busy and varied schedule that takes you all over the world, I can’t say I fault them for taking the approach they are with their kids. I’m willing to bet that they are learning quite a bit and that it is pretty well rounded.

    • WomanBearPig says:

      I agree. Every study that’s every been done on the subject has shown zero benefit to giving kids homework. Their kids are probably getting a better and more effective education than any of our kids are.

      • Kori says:

        My son has ADHD and one of his biggest problems was either doing his homework or turning it in when he did do it (the latter making me especially nutso). But he was super bright. We had personal meetings with his teachers (we didn’t want to go IEP if we didn’t have to because then it’s all very formal and impersonal and we were always fortunate he had understanding teachers) and some of them dropped his homework requirement. Their view was that he was getting A+ on his quizzes and tests so obviously he wasn’t having trouble learning the material–what homework is supposed to accomplish–so why drag down his grades with redundant work.

      • LT says:

        Agreed. No homework and no testing (even if that is true) does not mean no education – not by a long shot. The primary purpose of testing is to prove mastery of a subject, but there are other ways to do that.

  7. GoodNamesAllTaken says:

    I think homeschooling should be illegal. There, I said it. The people I know who homeschool are: one of my husband’s partners, who is brilliant but completely socially inept to the point where conversation with him is torture, and his bedraggled little wife from Sweden who still, after 30 years in this country, barely speaks English because he insists that only Finnish be spoken in their home by their 7 children, because yeah, that’s going to help them later in life; my born-again old neighbor who is dumb as a rock and thinks public schools are bad because sex education encourages sex, in fact all of the public school students are probably having sex right this minute because sex, sex, sex; and my neighbor in Maryland who has some sort of phobia or combination of phobias that make it hard for HER to take her daughter to school, so she just teaches her herself. I know that’s a small sampling, but my point is NONE of these people have any business teaching at home and I feel sorry for their kids.

    However, I think Brad and Angie’s kids seem very well behaved and I find it hard to believe they don’t have rules.

    • GreenieWeenie says:

      It’s all very circumstantial. I might end up homeschooling, even though I’m not a fan in theory, because I refuse–I really find it wrong on so many levels–to pay upwards of $15000 USD/year for preschool through high school, which is how things fly where I live. I will not.

    • noway says:

      I felt the same way for a while, and then I met a couple of families who homeschooled their kids, and I was very impressed. Apparently, there are organizations where they co-op with other parents to have a few lessons together and those parents would teach subjects they were more educated in. Two things I came out of this was yes homeschooling can be beneficial, and there is no way I could do it. In fairness to the Jolie-Pitts they travel so much, I would think a regular school might present that problem, and also security issues too. Now I know other celebrities do it, but I am sure there are issues with them too, and maybe this is just easier.

      • aenflex says:

        What a wonderful comment.

      • phlyfiremama says:

        Houston has an AMAZING homeschool network. At any given moment there are dozens of classes being conducted all over the city, that students can attend. There are entire curriculums developed all the way from pre-K through high school, lots of computer based programs, and multiple social physical activities at any given time: bowling, skating, swimming, you name it. There are also lots of social events and opportunities, that give the kids social skills and such. If anyone who lives in Houston is interested, it is called the Greater Houston Area Homeschooler (GHAH) Association

    • Casi says:

      Quick, let me go tell my homeschooling friends to stop with the literature, math, foreign languages, history, science, and cool PE activities like the circus class (tumbling, juggling, trapeze) to stop because GNAT knows some whackadoodle parents.

      If I had it to do again, I would homeschool my kids using a classical Ignatian curriculum supplemented by a good homeschooling co-op and social opportunities like community sports, music, and scouts,and a different history curriculum through 6th grade and then find them the most rigorous secondary education that emphasized something they really liked: STEM for my oldest, liberal arts for my middle, and well-rounded with a performing arts emphasis for my percussionist youngest girl. In the end, I appreciate that they are intelligent, thinking, empathetic young adults and hope that they know I made the best decisions I could with the resources and data I had available.

      • Colette says:

        Well my friend’s daughter was molested by a teacher at a regular shool.So I think we should ban schools since there are hundreds of teachers who have engaged in inappropriate behavior or worse with their students.
        #sarcasm

      • KB says:

        You’re both using anecdotal information to base your feelings on. The average experience probably lies somewhere in the middle. Though I tend to think there are far fewer homeschooled kids learning foreign languages and getting to trapeze. It sounds like your friends are probably comfortable financially and I would guess college educated? Not so for a lot of families that are homeschooling.

    • Santia says:

      I, too, started off feeling the same way, UNTIL I met some absolutely brilliant homeschooled children. Frankly, I think it depends on the parent. If you – the parent – don’t have two brain cells to rub together, you have no business homeschooling your kids. In the case I saw, there was a community of homeschooled kids, all with highly educated parents who took turns teaching them. The kids were also socialized that way, since they weren’t home alone.

      • CORAL. says:

        Sounds like a great plan, but very very rare. Number 1) the rarity is in having a ‘community,’ of parents/neighbors who are educated sufficiently (to my standards) that you’d trust with your kids education. 2) Do they demand to see these parents transcripts and 3) are they vetted with background checks like a school system would do?

        I mean, you could have Jared Fogle ‘tutoring,’ you know what I mean? In fact, most people would have loved to say that wealthy educated Subway Jared, was their kid’s math tutor. Ugh.

        I’m against wide-scale homeschooling and charters frankly because it takes funding away from public schools, and for many years there were absolutely no safety nets in place for those kids.

        They just disappeared out of the system.

        You didn’t know if they we’re being educated with structure or not, and in fact, often they could have just been little more than captive prisoners of indulgent parents for which ‘home schooling,’ gave them some usefulness.

        They didn’t want their little Johnny and Susie leaving them alone and at home, because what were they, if not hands on smothering parents.

        There have been tons of books on the parents of millenials and how they’ve been ruined.

      • Tanya says:

        That’s how it’s done amongst the homeschoolers I know as well. Most felt that the public school system wasn’t serving their children well (tolerating bullying, their kids had special needs, or too much testing) and take it seriously. Their kids tend to skip straight to community college when it was time for calculus, etc. It’s a very diverse group now.

        On topic, Star seems to be describing progressive education. My kids go to a progressive school, and it’s been wonderful for them. Kids naturally want to learn, and education that doesn’t snuff that desire out of them is a good thing.

    • noway says:

      My issue with some home schooling is it is hard for the teacher to be adept in all subjects. I have a B.S. in two majors and I would find it hard to feel like I was an adequate teacher for my daughter in many of her subjects, no matter how well I prepared. I think you need specialized teachers a lot quicker than most people think. Still some people realize this and make accommodations, and I have seen some very smart well socialized home schooled kids with a great love of learning. The people who take it seriously and accommodate the limitations generally have the best outcomes. There are limitations in all forms of educations though.

      • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

        My problem with it is that any idiot can do it, and all idiots think they are smarter than they are and they will be better than public schools.

      • lucy2 says:

        That’s what I’ve always wondered about as well – if the parent can handle the more advanced stuff, or brings in outside help as I’ve heard many say they do, then I think it’s fine, but otherwise it could potentially be limiting for the kids. An extreme example would be the Duggars – those kids will never learn anything beyond the tiny world their parents know.

    • Algernon says:

      I don’t think it should be illegal, but it should be regulated. Maybe it already is? Do homeschooled kids have to pass the same standardized tests?

      I’ve known products from both sides of the debate. I knew kids growing up who were homeschooled by their religious nut parents, and they’re adults with minimum wage jobs because their educations prepared them for nothing. But I’ve also known kids who were homeschooled that turned out brilliantly, with well rounded educations that helped them become fascinating adults with many hobbies and interests, and they all also have very high-powered jobs and are some of the best critical thinkers and problem solvers I’ve ever met. It depends entirely on the quality of education being received.

    • Locke Lamora says:

      I completely agree. In my country it is illegal, unless the child is severly disabled (but there are speacila schools for those children ,or the child gets a tutor), not sending you kid to school could get you in jail.

      Regarding only speaking Finnish at home – if I was to live in a foreign country, I would speak only my language with my kids. They will learn English outside of the home anyway, but it so easy for them to forget or never learn their mother tongue. I’ve met a few people who live abroad and their kids barely speak our language, or have atrocious accents. It’s rather sad.

    • rice_bunny says:

      I understand your point of view, but you forgot to consider that Brangelina’s kids are homeschooled by actual educated professionals/teachers, while the people you knew were just parents deciding to be teachers to their own kids…makes quite a difference. In my opinion, as long as kids are being taught by qualified people then public/private/homeschool/etc is fine.

    • Enid says:

      I would argue that these kids aren’t being homeschooled. They have tutors and are receiving something more kin to a private school education than what we consider in the modern day to be “homeschooling.”

    • Lrm says:

      Well then I guess you need to meet more homeschoolers. There ard plenty of crazy “regular school” stories to match the home schooling ones too. And both have failures and successes. Why shouldn’t there be options? No one approach regarding education healthcare religion etc is always successful or without negativs for some people.

      We home schooled for several years and now our child is in one of the top districts in the US and doing great. Home school was the right option at the time and the current school situation wouldn’t be as successful for this child, had we not home schooled earlier. Depends on the child. Yes some homeschooler families are kinda weird lol. But so are some families who attend any type of school.

      Eta oops this was supposed to be a reply to GNAT

    • Jib says:

      I agree. 99% of the time it is done because the parents are very religious and don’t want their kids exposed to those “other kids.” You know, the ones they are going to compete with for college spots and jobs.

      And as a high school English teacher of 25 years, I know for a fact that no one without my education can teach the very difficult AP and British Literature that I teach anywhere near as well as I do. Just like I can’t teach my own kids Calculus or Chemistry. High schools have teachers who have specialties, and they are very smart and very learned. To think that reading a few books on “How to home school” will make up for a degree in a subject and a mandatory Masters degree (in NY, where I teach) is just vanity and ridiculous.

      Plus, all of the home schooled kids who come into high school from home schooling have trouble adjusting to not being the center of the teacher’s world, as they were at home, and many have social difficulties.

      Thanks, GNAT!!!

      • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

        You’re welcome, and thank you. It’s fine for people to fantasize about how great they would be at teaching their kids every subject. But without the training and even minimal supervision, so many of these “homeschoolers” are just big ego inflated weirdos.

  8. astrid says:

    Pretty much all the pap shots and more reliable articles about the kids makes them look grounded and well behaved. The older kids have travelled with Angelina to worn torn countries to see the horror first hand. While their education is less “traditional” by western standards, I don’t believe they aren’t being educated.

  9. I Choose Me says:

    Yeah. I side-eye this one because it’s Star. Two, wouldn’t nannies or former nannies have signed non-disclosure agreements.

    I do buy that the kids don’t have normal school structure but I think everyone has their own learning style and Brad and Angie can afford to pay for tutors that will tailor lessons to each kid so I’m not sure that’s a bad thing. Not a fan of tests myself.

  10. lisa2 says:

    I never understand the OBSESSION with the tabloids about the education of these children.. and of course Angie is the BAD mother. They do have 2 parents that have both talked about their kids being homeschooled. Why are there people hoping that these children are deprived.

    When they are seen out they seem very well behaved and respectful. and why do we have to have a thread on EVERY TABLOID STORY

  11. Patricia says:

    This article seems to think that freedom of expression means no rules.
    My child is free to express himself as much as he wants and as much as he can. If he oversteps a boundary then he is corrected. If he knowingly and repeatedly oversteps a boundary then he is disciplined. But there is a lot of expression and freedom that can happen even in a household with rules and discipline.
    The Jolie Pitt children seem well mannered, calm, and present. I think Angelina is probably doing a wonderful job.

    And a woman so focused on the suffering of refugees throughout the world would be unlikely to let her own children miss out on education – she sees first hand that many many families wish their children could be educated and it’s a sad struggle for the refugees. I really don’t think she would let that go by the wayside. Not taking tests does not mean not learning.

  12. Linn says:

    Was it star that had all those “super informed insiders” talking about the Brangelina wedding that turned out to be 100% wrong?

    I wouldn’t be surprised if those children don’t get the typical american education, but I take everything written by star with a huge mountain of salt.

    And not taking tests and doing (much) homework isn’t necessary a bad thing. The praised finnish education system works (somewhat) similar.

  13. Sixer says:

    No censorship imposed on me by my parents either. And I’ve never imposed any on the Sixlets. This doesn’t necessarily imply a laissez-faire parental attitude – in fact, it often requires more parental involvement, not less, because kids are inquisitive and want to discuss things they see and do.

    Education-by-test, all too popular in schools these days, can retard critical thinking. No structure can impede the acquisition of broad-based skillsets that children need if they are to become fully-rounded citizens in a modern world. It’s not one or the other: it’s a bit of both.

  14. Mrs. Wellen Melon says:

    When I read about this kind of celebrity kid education, my reaction is “But why are you limiting your children like this?”

    Maybe they’ll want to reach higher and further than what mom and dad are doing. Maybe the’ll want to be an ambassador who negotiates peace or a pediatric cancer specialist or a human rights lawyer or any of a thousand jobs which require an excellent education.

    Don’t we all wish that Kendall Jenner’s mom and Dad were proud of her graduation from college and not her strut down the runway in cheap lingerie. The parents made choices that limited Kendall to fulfilling the parents’ aspirations. I hope that the Jolie Pitts are not doing the same.

    • noway says:

      I don’t think you can compare the Jolie-Pitts to the Kardashians. First the Kardashians are all primarily product brand spokesmen or snake oil salesmen if you want to take the negative view. Brad and Angelina are primarily actors, directors, producers and writers. The Kardashians need the constant publicity to make a living. I think the Jolie-Pitts would still be able to do their careers without it.

      I find it funny though that you use Kendall as your example. She is the one with an actual occupation, modeling. Maybe it is a bit light weight, but still people have been models for a long time. Also, two of the Kardashians have college degrees believe it or not.

  15. Rosalee says:

    I read years ago the high level educational qualifications including languages such as french and Spanish required by applicants to work for the Jolie-Pitt children, I assumed the children were taught by team of professionals. No doubt AJ allows the children educational freedom to focus on individual interests – but I bet they are taught the basics

  16. GreenieWeenie says:

    I don’t know. I’m not convinced much of it matters before high school. Actually, it’s important for you to expose your kids to as much as possible when their brains are going through puberty as for whatever biological reason, they are most likely to retain those skills/information for life. But for your elementary education, I’m not convinced any of it is essential and I’m the hugest champion of a classic liberal arts education (and have too many degrees myself, so it’s not as though I don’t value a formal education. I do).

    I think Jolie has talked about how she wishes she had been more aware and less self-absorbed when she was younger–that it would’ve helped her perspective. I doubt she’s going to raise a pack of clueless kids. She understands the value of being able to write and communicate in a professional environment.

  17. Colette says:

    Yeah they don’t care about education.That’s why they spend hundreds of thousands to have three multilingual teachers travel with them? They don’t care about education.That’s why there are dozens of pics of them at “book stores”.
    #sarcasm
    Angelina and Brad have both talked about the kids visiting the set AFTER school.If school wasn’t important they would be at the set INSTEAD of school.

  18. minx says:

    I doubt the Star knows the ins and outs of the Jolie-Pitt kids’ educations.

  19. Tippi says:

    I hope that’s not true. Children need a peer group, they need friends from outside their family, they need to be exposed to a diversity of people, they need to learn discipline and have a routine. You can’t raise them in an environment isolated from peers and with no interaction with reality without serious consequences. Look at Will Smiths kids or the Duggars. Homeschooling (unless done for good reason and proper socialising, education and routine), separation from a community and family cults have horrific consequences for children’s ability to grow into independent, competent, socially able adults.

    They may have enormous trust funds but it’s not going to be a happy life without sanity, education, real friends and none of those things are possible if they see everybody outside their family as servants and outside their compound as aliens.

    • Jellybean says:

      I agree! Though a nightmare, the constant bickering and falling out between teenagers is all part of their development. You can learn a lot from siblings, but you are all from the same background, you need to learn to deal with people with different attitudes and opinions, people who are not paid by your mum and dad.

    • Lucky Charm says:

      They have plenty of friends outside the family, we just don’t always get pictures of them. The children have all been on sports teams (there were pictures just a few months ago of Brad and Angelina attending Zahara and Shiloh’s soccer games), and the girls have all taken ballet classes, and the time they were caught leaving Gwen Stefani’s house after a play date. These kids are not isolated from the real world and real people, just because we don’t see it.

      • BNA. FN says:

        I’ve seen the boys at soccer and football games with friends, eg Marian Pearl’s Son. I don’t believe the children are without friends their own age. Two days ago DM had Angelina leaving LAX with the children and a friend accompanying them leaving LA. Yesterday DM had Angie out with Shiloh, Viv and the same girl friend out in Cambodia shopping. I. Guessing they have friends and family we never see because we hardly see these kids out and about.

  20. Jellybean says:

    I am not particularly concerned about the curriculum aspects of this. If the team of teachers are good they can bring the basic skills into any topic the kids choose, it just requires imagination and flexibility on the part of the teachers and it isn’t as though they will be bogged down by work load and lack of resources. Of more concern is the lack of day to day contact with regular people of their own age. I understand they will be taken to refugee camps and such, but there is a mass of humanity between the desperate and the super rich. You only have to see the lack of understanding from all the Old Etonian t**ts than run the UK.

    • Emma - The JP Lover says:

      @Jellybean, who wrote: “Of more concern is the lack of day to day contact with regular people of their own age.”

      You keep on saying this without any evidence to back it up. Even if you are new to “Celebitchy,” how could you have missed reports over the years or even earlier this year of the Jolie-Pitt children engaging in activities with other children? Heck, even “Female First” had a thread about Shiloh and Zahara’s soccer game on their Board.

  21. The Original G says:

    It’s Star. This sounds like fodder tailor made for anti-Angelina trolls.

    • Jellybean says:

      This is true too.

    • The Original G says:

      And let’s save our outrage for the inequalities that prevent regular and poor children all over the world from being well educated.

      The children of the well to do, well connected will be fine.

  22. swack says:

    The fact that they hire qualified teachers puts them ahead of the children who are home schooled by parents that don’t know what they are doing. Don’t get me started on the test thing. I taught for 30 years and all this testing is just taking away time when a teacher could be teaching something other than the test that needs to be taken. Testing doesn’t necessarily prove someone knows the material. As far as homework – I’m sure they are getting what they need during their instruction time. As a secondary math teacher I always have time in class to work on extra practice in case they had questions. If they didn’t finish, they took the rest home.

    • Locke Lamora says:

      How does testing in America work? Is it one huge test at the end of each semester or peridiodic tests troughout the year? Are there any oral exams?

  23. Saphana says:

    i think raising them in the spotlight will do damage to them but i doubt both dont care. nowadays i would not believe that Angelina thinks “rules suck” i would think its the opposite i can see her as a very strict mother.

  24. Jayna says:

    Brad said in an interview that they have four hours of school at home and that that includes homework he said.

    • Ollie says:

      Just 4 hours? That’s nothing when you consider all the school subjects.

      • Jayna says:

        I was kind of shocked when he included homework in that four hours for the older kids like Maddox. He said that leaves them the rest of the day to pursue things that interest them.

      • S says:

        How much time is wasted in a traditional school setting though? 4 hours of directed study is probably more teaching than my middle schooler gets.

      • Jib says:

        @ s says,
        My better students who are Maddox’s age and are taking AP subjects often don’t even have a lunch period – which isn’t ideal, but they spend a ton of time in the classroom. From Period 1 to Period 9 is 8AM to 2:30PM, (so 6 and a half hours, plus homework) no lunch, no study halls. My son had this schedule, but he did have a lunch. He did very well at an Ivy League college.

      • Emma - The JP Lover says:

        @Ollie, who wrote: “Just 4 hours? That’s nothing when you consider all the school subjects.”

        How many hours were ‘you’ in school? Most kids are in school for 6-hour, which includes and hour for lunch. And that includes waking back and forth to classes. 4-straight hours for school work 5-days a week seems enough. It is my understanding that two (or more) of the Jolie-Pitt kids are bilingual (French) as well. There ‘is’ something to traveling with small kids as they tend to pick up languages easily.

  25. Lucky Charm says:

    It’s Star, so I’m sure the “former nannies” are probably just people who applied for the job but didn’t get it. Those kids are all so well behaved in public, and do you know how that happens? Discipline. I don’t believe for one second that those kids run around doing nothing but playing all day and night without rules or limits. I’m quite sure that AJP values education and makes sure her children are receiving a good one. She’s been around the world and has seen first hand the impact of the lack of education. No, it’s probably not traditionally structured like we’re used to here in the U.S., but considering how that’s (not) working out for us, I certainly don’t blame them.

  26. What's inside says:

    Total crap. Angelina is an avid reader and Brad is involved in the study of architecture, both of them are creatively engaged in many business ventures, and are actively involved in the care and welfare of their children.

  27. lisa2 says:

    So let’s see. Angelina has BUILT schools to educate children; but she doesn’t believe in educating their own children. She and Brad have both talked about helping their kids with homework; and even during this promotion she talked about the kids working hard to get their school work done so they could come to set.

    STAR and other tabloids run this same story year after year.

  28. Catelina says:

    First of all, this is probably BS, second of all, they’ve been pictured with friends many times before. I doubt they’re isolated and anti social.

  29. Not a fan says:

    And if they even bother with college, they’ll have no problem getting in, just like all the other wealthy kids. The whome college admissions process is totally corupt.

    • BNA. FN says:

      I remember Angelina saying MADD was very smart and he wants to be a writer. (I’m thinking that’s why in By The Sea, Brad is a writer). Also, Angelina had mentioned that Z has a beautiful singing voice. I’m sure she is getting lessons in voice coaching, just a guess. Shiloh is very artistic in the arts I read from an interview from Angelina. Angelina had mentioned MADD and Pax have a teacher from their birth country and that Viv and Knox were fluent in French. I’m sure those kids will be very well educated.

      • Maria says:

        All parents say their children are very smart though. I don’t think there is anything special about the Jp kids at all. Even if they are home schooled, they don’t get the experience of being with other children and learning in a classroom. Sorry but mommies do love to think their kids are more better and more special then others.

    • Maria says:

      They will get whatever they want without working hard for it. Many celeb kids get into the top schools, the best jobs without working hard for it . Its nepotism and cronyism.

  30. original kay says:

    There are many ways to be educated. The old fashioned system of sitting in a class, learning by rote, and regurgitating it on paper at a specific time is just that… old fashioned.

  31. Whatevs says:

    The Jolie-Pitts are unconventional parents, and in other news, water is wet. But “unconventional” doesn’t mean “bad.” Whatever else anyone may think or know about them, it’s super obvious that they ADORE those children, and I can’t see them being neglectful of their education. Especially since, as others have pointed out, they both seem to know quite well that a good education is one of the great equalizers in this very unequal world.

  32. FingerBinger says:

    There shouldn’t be any photos or articles about celebrity kids. There’s already too much information about these kids out there.

  33. alihar999 says:

    Both of them the childhood they never had? Angie yes…..but Brad was raised in a small town by 2 loving parents and didn’t get in to acting until he was out of high school. So he is not trying to have a second childhood. I just think he lets Angie make all of those decisions. Lets hope none of them decide they want to be a doctor later in their childhood without any formal schooling.

  34. Algernon says:

    Kaiser, I went to a new agey hippy dippy “no grades” school and it was amazing. There are probably loopholes to exploit that could result in a bad school and bad teaching practices, but my experience was wonderful. I struggled in school from day one, and my parents were totally at a loss as to what to do. At home I was reading Russian literature out of my dad’s library when I was nine, at school I was failing every class. There was a huge disconnect between my abilities and my school performance, and I saw a slew of counselors and doctors trying to figure out what was going on. I didn’t have a learning disability or any kind of autism (as was expected when I was little, because I wasn’t a very tactile kid). Finally, one doctor suggested my parents talk to his wife, who was on the board of an experimental private school. I ended up going to that school for junior and high school and I thrived. It was based on Waldorf education, and there were no tests and no grades. I didn’t get report cards, I got actual reports detailing my progress in each area of study. I don’t think it would work for every kid, but I’m a hands-on, visual learner. Sitting silently in a room being droned at to memorize charts is never going to penetrate my brain. I learned mathematics (an area I was *way* behind in when I started the new school) by building abacuses and mechanical machines to help me understand the principals behind calculus and physics. Instead of one language class a day, I did half of all my schooling in French throughout high school; even my Spanish classes were taught in French. Today, I am proudly quad-lingual: English, French, Spanish, and Italian, and I’m taking Portuguese classes for fun. I was very much struck my freshman year of college by how dumb my peers were. They were totally unprepared to think critically or write college-style papers, and there was so much they didn’t know that I considered baseline knowledge. They hadn’t been exposed at all to philosophy, rhetoric, or theoretical science and math. A lot of kids make the leap that first year in college, but some never do. Their minds stay in those narrow little rote-learning lanes. I can see where it wouldn’t work for everyone, but there some basic principles to alternative education that could probably help a lot when combined with more traditional principles.

  35. Maria says:

    I am sure they are home schooled but I would not be surprised if these kids go into acting, music, reality tv rather then become doctors or lawyers. They have access to the best education systems but sadly I don’t think they will take advantage of that.
    I mean, Jolie herself said her older son will be with her every day filming her new movie. I am not sure if that is her son’s wish or Jolie’s wish, but think he should be focusing on his school work rather then help his mom direct another vanity project. Something tells me none of the kids will go onto university or anything. They will be in show business.

    • Colette says:

      One of their kids is interested in filmmaking.So what ? Most of Denzel Washington’s kids work in the entertainment industry.So do Meryl Streep’s kids,Tom Hanks,Spielberg’s kids etc.I am sure the Joliet Pitt kids will be allowed to pursue whatever careers they want to.

    • Paige says:

      She said he will be working behind the scenes after school. He’s not going to be doing that much. I’m sure it won’t stop him from focusing on his school work.

      • Maria says:

        @ Paige
        Does he not have homework to do after school? I mean yeah he can see his parents doing things but I don’t think that is a very wise use of time if you are a teen or child still in school.

    • Maria says:

      @ Colette
      Did any of Steven Speilbergs kids help him out when they were children or teens? Denzels too? No they pursed a show biz career when they when they were of adult age.
      I am sure their children are interested in filmmaking but he should focus on his school work rather then helping his mom out on her movie. I don’t think that is right of Jolie to make him help her out every day. What happens if he decides later in life he doesn’t want to be a go into filming? You should always have a back up plan.

  36. dippit says:

    Even with the Star built-in doubt, this isn’t a stretch to believe. They certainly appear to live an atypically unstructured existence, with flexibility fitting their parents’ schedules and particular focus at any given time.

    Angelina has indicated in interviews her favouring the unusual experiences the children have, as having learning benefit and outcomes, as ahead of the educational benefits from more formal teaching and regular activities and peer engagement.

    I’ve always taken that as more her signalling up some liberal, free-thinking, avante garde virtue about herself (Brad). Admittedly, that’s because I usually sense or perceive Angelina as very wrapped up in presenting an affected image in order to appear interesting. The children often seem to be one aspect through which she furthers her own reflection of herself.

    Everyone is unique, but most live a balance of not having their ‘specialness’ take overwhelming priority ahead of the more fundamental points of commonality with everyone else. A solid foundation, with a sense of perspective (including understanding of limitations) coupled with nurturing individual promise has always seemed a reasonable approach to me overall; and especially crucial in early-stage parenting.

    But some parents need to stamp their offspring as ‘exceptional’ ahead of that balance, and as an extension of their own notions of their own exceptionalism. It’s not difficult for me to consider Angelina might be one of those type of parents; just more rarefied due to access to near unlimited wealth and resource. And while she’d perhaps argue it as giving them a freedom to broaden their horizons, the converse is that, typically, it ill-equips them as they reach adulthood to appreciate some of the realities of life and leads to developing caricature not character.

  37. desertrose says:

    Why do they look so utterly depressed all of the time? This whole clan needs to lighten up.

  38. Gina says:

    yeah, very much doubt that. Brad is clearly fascinated by architecture and you can’t be an architect without proper education. And Angelina is very grateful to be alive because of a medical progress that detected the cancer gene before it was too late. They are anything but hippies and they both are fascinated by science and technology

    • extracookie says:

      “and you can’t be an architect without proper education. ” Very true. And that’s why he’s not one.

    • Jib says:

      Gina,
      WHat the heck are you talking about?? Brad is NOT an architect. You need calculus to be an architect, I would bet you my house that BP did NOT take calculus. And Angelina had doctors who knew what they were doing – you talk like she is going to quit acting and go work as a cancer doctor at Sloan Kettering. Seriously – give it a rest. They seem like two reasonably intelligent but not very well educated people who play make believe for a living.

      • BNA. FN says:

        Brad is three credits from getting his degree from a university in Missouri. Angelina graduated high school at age 16. Not sure how much college education she has.

  39. Pondering thoughts says:

    “And they don’t take tests or do homework.” Adds a nanny, “Let’s face it, none of those kids will ever be going after low-level jobs, so it’s not like they need a formal education the way other kids would.”

    Nope, sorry. General education isn’t just for getting a job. It is for getting along in the world you live in. It is very useful to know how to write a formal or semi-formal letter demanding certain rules or laws were obeyed. It is also useful to have a general understanding of many of those laws and freedoms and restrictions and possibilites that shape our lives and country.
    Additionally general education allows you to get a bit of everything at least and that opens up new worlds to you. I would never have taken chemistry classes if I hadn’t had to. But it turned out to be interesting and useful. Nope, I still don’t like chemistry but I don’t regret that I was “forced” to learn it.
    And finally I do believe that the majority of the population is served very well with a rather broad approach in early and secondary education. That means you absolutely should get a general understanding of several natural sciences (chem, phys, bio) and of several social sciences (history, sociology, politics…) and of several arts (arts painting drawing, performing arts: music, … movies) and several foreign languages and of course, you own language. And computers.
    General education is also for reaching your potential – and not just that potential that helps you get a paid job. There are tons of amateur artists who find their activities very satisfying despite not getting paid. Humans don’t just develop skills to earn money.

    I am not sure that that what star reports, is true. As far as I know it is the case that the staff of celebrities has to sign confidentiality agreements. I would be astonished if the nannies hadn’t had to do that.

    Additionally: most western countries have some kind of “obligation to send children to school” or some kind of “obligation to provide children with lessons” or similar. As the Jolie-Pitt children are US american it would be for the US american authorities to check on their education if such suspicions of deficitary education arose.
    So, are the authorities acting accordingly?

    • Emma - The JP Lover says:

      @Pondering Thoughts, who wrote: “And finally I do believe that the majority of the population is served very well with a rather broad approach in early and secondary education. That means you absolutely should get a general understanding of several natural sciences (chem, phys, bio) and of several social sciences (history, sociology, politics…) and of several arts (arts painting drawing, performing arts: music, … movies) and several foreign languages and of course, you own language. And computers.”

      You just described the Jolie-Pitt lifestyle. They travel constantly and immerse their kids in the local culture of whatever country they stay in. Two or more of the kids are now bilingual in French. They always seem to visit art stores and bookstores where the kids each emerge with full bags. They are encouraged to use their imaginations and are all huge Disney fans. But more importantly, they are encouraged to romp around outside, which is sadly lacking in the childhoods of many kids together, no matter how much formal schooling they have.

      • Pondering thoughts says:

        @ Emma

        Nope, I didn’t describe the Jolie-Pitt lifestyle in my description of a broad education. That I didn’t do. Because travelling disrupts education a lot as some tutors or teachers change and the new ones don’t always pick up where the old ones stopped. The teaching methods can change extremely. Not good.

        And nope, travelling alone doesn’t educate anybody nor does it always broaden anybodys mind. You can travel to another country and see the fancy buildings and admire strange artefacts and come back without having learned more than you would learn playing Tomb Raider.
        But being fully immersed in other cultures and having deeper conversations with foreigners and reading good books about issues does improve education. Reading different quality newspapers and blogs in foreign languages improves education. And for most of those things you need people who help you through this (teachers, educators, well-educated people). Not every book nor every school book is a good book. Not everybody can give you a good overview about another country’s situation. Not everbody understands “education” ;-9:
        In other words: there is a difference between a consumerist approach (shopping, entertainment …) to new things and learning and education and “Bildung” which would be even more than “education”.

        Visiting art stores and bookstores isn’t enough. That doesn’t provide a guarantee that there is more than a consumerist approach.

        Running around outside is difficult for children nowadays because of increased urbanisation and traffic. And the Jolie-Pitt children do suffer from these things even more than non-celebrity children because there is a danger of them being kidnapped.

  40. jwoolman says:

    When you are taught one-on-one by tutors, they don’t need to sit you down in a room and have you fill out a multiple-choice or true/false test to know if you are getting the material. You are being tested far more effectively every day. And everything you do is “homework”…. Schools are structured with tests and homework because they are typically inefficient and and there are too many distractions during school. That simply isn’t the only way to go or even the best way to go, it is simply easier to have large classrooms with few teachers even though obviously children learn much better otherwise.

    And the socializing effect of the “normal” school is highly overrated. Schoolrooms are full of bullies, disruptive students, bored students, etc. None of these are conducive to learning about the subject or how to function well as an adult. Quite the opposite. Some people are lucky and have a good experience. Many of us are unlucky and end up hating school. It’s like being stuck in a miserable job with an awful boss and awful coworkers and no chance of getting another job. You just endure, you don’t enjoy it. There are many other ways to let your kids get together with other kids in a much less horrible environment.

    The Jolie-Pitt kids are really just in a very small private school that travels with them. But I’ve known parents who homeschool their kids, and they’re nothing like the Duggars. They have arrangements with local schools for things they can’t teach well at home for older kids, or else focus on the basics with the younger ones and then transition to a private or public school full-time at some point. With computerized learning available with online teachers and video conferencing capabilities, schools are more and more cooperating extensively with “homeschoolers”. It’s about doing what’s best for the kids. And quite a few kids do far better learning at home with all the tools now available. Just being able to be physically active any time they need it can be a huge help to many kids. Many children are simply not ready to sit still in a chair for long periods, it’s not really natural at their developmental stage.

  41. Cirque28 says:

    Unschooling. (As others mentioned above.) The kid in my family who was unschooled is brilliant, went to a very competitive college and (unlike *some* kids who go to traditional school) still loves to learn.

    I don’t buy the idea that Brangelina give their children the most perfect life ever, but it’s very clear that they hope to be seen as intellectuals and giving their children a superior education through a team of international teachers is part of that.

  42. Dara says:

    Unconventional doesn’t equate with bad or nonexistent – sometimes it is actually better preparation for how life really works. I went to a Liberal Arts college that didn’t believe in tests, grades or tenure for its instructors and yet it is considered one of the best colleges of its kind in the country and its alumni have an incredible acceptance rate for graduate school.

    I should say my early education was very traditional and I did quite well in that environment – my SAT scores were good enough that my high-school counselor couldn’t understand why I picked the college I did rather than some Ivy League powerhouse. I explained that I wanted to learn more than how to take a multiple-choice test.

    I knew I made the right decision when, on my first day at college, the instructor pointed out he didn’t consider his job to be just imparting facts and figures or theories, his job was to teach us how to go out and learn those things for ourselves – his job was really to teach us how to think and solve problems. He loved it when someone challenged him in class and encouraged contrarians and devil’s advocates. I think of him fondly every time I have to learn something new for my job, or life in general. The need to learn never stops, even if you are no longer in “school”.

  43. Gwen_pens says:

    I am going to say I think not sending them to school is a very good thing.I do not even like them.But it will save them from common core.I believe they know a thing or two about that agenda.
    They travel in the same circles from where it came.
    Little boxes for all.except the veRY wealthy

  44. Hannah says:

    Artsy and creative stuff are important but so is STEM. I hope this isn’t true. As for r rated movies – I grew up with my grandad on Rambo, Die Hard and tons of war movies. Wouldn’t change it for the world.

  45. Kath says:

    Meh. I’m not a Brange fangirl, but it’s difficult for tabloids to maintain the “the kids are running wild!” narrative when the kids in question appear polite and well-behaved in public. They are probably receiving a better education than I did at my crappy state school which went through a “let the kids decide!” phase which was disastrous.

    The celebrity kids that you can see were/are being damaged by a ‘no rules’ upbringing was Suri (before her mum got her out of $cientology) and the two Smith kids. I don’t believe this is true of the Jolie-Pitt kids at all.

    When they were in Australia filming ‘Unbroken’, Angelina arranged for an Indigenous artist to come to her house and teach the kids all about Aboriginal Australian culture. So, yeah, I don’t think that they’re lax parents about their children’s education.

  46. Ray says:

    Um Star magazine…..any one that believes anything they print are brain dead idiots and I have a bridge to no where that I would like to sell you 🙂

  47. Suzanne says:

    “They don’t take tests or do homework!” WHY BOTHER?…They know their kids will never have to work a day in their lives if they so choose…and still live better than most people on the planet…whether they’re socially accepted as morons or brain surgeons! It’s THAT simple.

  48. rudy says:

    Unconventional lives for sure, but not at all dysfunctional.

  49. lisa2 says:

    LMAO.. so all the “INSIDERS” that know so much about the children’s education couldn’t slip STAR a not saying that Angie was having surgery. I mean Mom was in the hospital and Dad with her.. but nobody knew.. not to mention the wedding or all the other things.

    I will say again why the obsession over these children. I don’t understand it.

    • BNA. FN says:

      @Lisa 2, I’m with you, I don’t get the obsession with these children. Dont these people understand Brad and Angelina are great parents. They will not leave their Children for months with nannies. Their children goes with them everywhere they go, what’s wrong with that? Brad and Angelina can afford to hire the best teachers to travel with the family. I’m sure they are getting the best education bar none. I would be more concerned with parents who go on location for months without seeing their children. Angle build schools for less privilege children, why would they not care that their children getting the best education.

      My thought and prayers goes out to the People in Paris. Stay strong!!

  50. JustJen says:

    Pffffttt…. as a parent my only opinion of this is- at least they’re not at Sea Org.

  51. MrsK says:

    I think the lack of opportunity to have friends is the thing that will push them into Barbara Hutton territory. I understand the dilemma and there’s no simple formula, but isolating them socially is a recipe for problems.

    • BNA. FN says:

      Why do you belive they have no friends? From what I have seen they have lots of friends and cousins. Don’t believe everything you read in the the weekly rags.

  52. so i saw Pulp Fiction at like 10 years old back in the early to mid 90s…. (thanks crazy dad and his gf)

    scarred me so bad I think i blocked out the gag-ball rape scene completely…. i still cant see that movie geeezzzzz