Michael Fassbender had never played ‘Assassin’s Creed’ when he signed on

fassy1

Michael Fassbender has been filming Assassin’s Creed, the film adaptation of the video game, for months now. Entertainment Weekly published this new photo from the film – that’s actress Ariane Labed on the left. Fassy plays Callum Lynch, the lead guy in the film standing in for the first-person POV of the game. Please don’t ask me to describe anything else about the game, because I can’t. I’m not a gamer. I really couldn’t care less. And as it turns out, Fassy couldn’t care less either. He signed on to star and produce Assassin’s Creed without ever having played the game. Is that funny? Or weird?

Ubisoft’s historical fiction-action-adventure series Assassin’s Creed stands as one of the most popular video game franchises ever created, selling more than 73 million copies and spawning comic books, novels, animated short films, even its own hard-cover encyclopedia in addition to popularizing some 20 series-related titles…. But before Ubisoft made their movie overture to him in 2012, Michael Fassbender admits he couldn’t have been less of a gamer and didn’t have the most concrete idea of what he was getting into.

“I hadn’t played it before these guys approached me,” Fassbender tells EW. Starring as Callum Lynch — a character who does not appear anywhere in the game but who exists as a kind of cypher for all the time-traveling, first-person action in the games — has yet to compel the man widely hailed as one of the finest actors of his generation to spend more quality time with his Playstation 4.

“I’ve played it since [being offered the job] mainly to get an idea of the physicality of the character,” Fassbender says by phone from Spain, where he was filming the adaptation. “We’re striving to find something special. We believe the whole concept around it is special and want to service that the best we can. The fans are really passionate: very specific and they expect accuracy and historical detail. We’re really trying to capitalize and feed on and enjoy the fun element. We’re working hard to make this something special.”

Descended from a long line of master killers (who square off against another secret sect called the Templars in a centuries-old covert war), his character’s physicality does not, however, involve super powers or magic. “A lot of the stuff in the game is Parkour,” Fassbender explains. “Blades attached to his wrists. It’s about getting in close to the target, close quarters fighting.”

And that, according to Assassin’s Creed director Justin Kurzel (who also directed Fassbender in this December’s Cannes-anointed adaptation of Macbeth), has involved the actor doing a lot of his own stunts. But he shrugs off questions about his physical feats on set. “I’ve learned how to roly poly, tumble turn,” Fassbender says with a laugh. “Stuff you can do in everyday life. Like cartwheels. No — just basic fight choreography stuff. I did some horse stuff today. So stuff like that.” Sounds killer.

[From EW]

While I’m not in the position to criticize Fassy for not being a gamer, I do think it’s strange that he would not only want to star in but produce a film based on a video game he had never played at that point. Video game nerds are like comic-book nerds: detail-oriented, passionate about minutiae and just looking to throw a tantrum about something. It would have helped if the producers on the film were very familiar with the world of Assassin’s Creed and willing to fight to get those details right. That being said, it does seem like the video game people are very involved in this film adaptation, so maybe Fassy is more like an actor-for-hire and everyone around him are making sure the details are correct.

wenn22981834

fassy2

Photos courtesy of EW, WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

36 Responses to “Michael Fassbender had never played ‘Assassin’s Creed’ when he signed on”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. MexicanMonkey says:

    I would argue it’s more important for the director and screenwriter to be familiar with the game than the actor. I can probably count on one hand the number of actors in comic book movies who actually read or care for Comics.

  2. ichsi says:

    Not a gamer either but from my gamer friends I’ve only seen eye-rolls for this so far. Also it’s helmed by the same hack who made Macbeth so I won’t ever spend money on this.

  3. CornyBlue says:

    AC is one of the coolest video games I played but i do not play a lot so what do I know. But the trailers that Ubisoft puts out of these games are mindnumbingly good. I doubt Fassy has time for playing games now though.

  4. Kate says:

    This actually makes me more interested. If he signed on to star and produce despite not knowing the game, odds are the script is pretty good.

    Most bad game adaptations have come from über fans of the game. A game adaptation coming from people less invested in the source material may actually be a good thing here.

  5. Abigail says:

    Since Ubisoft is producing I’m sure the details are right. Fassbender, also a co-producer, was actually approached in 2012, and it took these few years to get everything right, including apparently a script that he liked. Kurzel is a great director and Marion Cotillard is also in the film, so I’m eager to see it.

    • Addison says:

      I was just going to comment this. Ubisoft who created the AC universe is one of the producers. They want to look after their product so I’m sure it will be great.

      Also, Fassy never read comics and he has done an awesome job as Magneto so…

      The great thing about being a great “actor” is one doesn’t need to know much about the subject in order to be compelling in the role. He has also played a sex addict and a slave owner and doesn’t have a background on those two kinds of people either. He was compelling in both.

    • Carol says:

      Yeah, wasn’t too interested about the movie until I read this post. Now, I’m curious to see how a non-gamer/fassbender will helm this project

      • Farhi says:

        @Addison he did? He was so uninspiring and dead as Magneto. A waste. But I am sure the paycheck is good.

      • jammypants says:

        @Farhi, his Magneto was what made me even bother looking him up. He has an everyman face so it was a pleasant surprise to learn of all the roles he played that I’ve seen him in. He definitely stood out as Magneto in First Class.

    • lilacflowers says:

      I enjoyed Fassy’s Magneto. But I particularly enjoyed him in Inglourious Basterds.

  6. Rainbow says:

    I like AC but i like Assassins Kittens more https://youtu.be/jnk15Wf6xMU!

  7. Farhi says:

    Video game nerds will be pissed that he doesn’t care and he is not one of them. The promotions are going to be awkward.
    And with the same director as in Macbeth and Marion again? Because it worked so well the first time around apparently.(sarcasm intended)
    Fassbender is a good actor but he needs to pick projects HE CARES ABOUT because otherwise it shows.

    • Minxx says:

      What’s your point? I loved Kurzel’s Macbeth – both Fassbender and Cotillard were great in it. Critics apparently agree – 79% fresh on Rotten Tomatoes. Not his fault the movie was not promoted at all in the US. Maybe a bit too difficult for most people to grasp.

      • Farhi says:

        Not his fault it wasn’t promoted?
        It wasn’t promoted because the backers realized it wasn’t going to be well received by general public and most likely because Fassbender didn’t want to do promotion tours.
        The last time I saw him doing a promotion for Steve Jobs I saw “I don’t care” written on this face. If he wants to have lead roles he not only has to act he also has to sell his work. And selling would be easier if he cared about the subject.
        If he doesn’t / can’t sell his work then he cannot be a lead.

      • ichsi says:

        Kurzel’s Macbeth sealed it for me that I will never give a peep about movie critics’ opinions again.
        It’s a bad movie. It tries to be all artsy and deep but I cringed at the performances throughout the piece (that McDuff was the worst I’ve ever seen and I’ve seen many versions of the play); it’s technically weak (I get you want to make this all look dreamlike but hold your damn camera still!, why are all the actors only a few inches apart in ALL the scenes? Are you trying to make this more dramatic? Because it. doesn’t. work.), the sets don’t know which kind of movie they belong to, what’s going on with those witches (you’re making a movie, these are the moments you can seriously outshine any theatre production, don’t make it so ridiculously boring), and it can’t shake the cheap hipster film school project look the whole time. Never mind the burning of the damp Scottish woods with petrol, as you can tell by the clearly visible black smoke. Or that Macbeth had by far the most chemistry with the young soldier boy and not Lady Macbeth or Banquo; you know, the people he should have chemistry with.
        I can’t remember being this disappointed by a movie in a long time because I had my hopes for it (my favourite Shakespeare play with one of my favourite actors, how neat!) and the good reviews supported that hope. Instead I got this pretentious, overrated piece of *beep*.

      • Moon says:

        Macbeth wasn’t a good movie. I thought fassbender was good and Marion badly directed, and these are two actors whose work I admire. Not a fan of kurzel’s interpretation.

    • Moon says:

      Farhi doesn’t like Fassbender because he’s dating AV 😉

      Sorry couldn’t resist throwing that ludicrous logic back at the other camp. Now do you see how silly it is?

      Side note – I think this movie looks like a disaster too.

  8. Joni says:

    He doesn’t strike me as a gamer. And what is it with him playing Syrian characters? First steve jobs now this.

  9. Anon says:

    What upsets me is that the director is the same that directed Macbeth. It was sooooo bad. AC is not going to be a success. I’m sure of it. Fassbender should just focus on doing good films with serious matters and complicated characters because he is wasting his talent imo

    • Minxx says:

      Macbeth to me was fantastic. It was very moving and artsy.. yes, some kids walked out of it, but I loved it. The score is amazing.

      • anon says:

        Moving? It was extremely flat to me. Beautiful scenery but that’s it. It was mostly the director’s fault in my opinion. I’ve read Macbeth and it’s everything. It really strikes me how the managed to do such an “un-moving” film on this tragedy lol Each to their own, of course

    • FingerBinger says:

      @Anon Fassbender wants to make money. Many of these actors want to be in franchise films. They all want ironman or batman success.

      • Jay (the Canadian one) says:

        Doesn’t X-Men count?

      • anon says:

        He is a part of a franchise, does he really need another one? He hadn’t even played it for christ’s sake so that means he doesn’t care about AC. Plus how is he going to make money if the film flops? lol Ugh I just want to see him in sth like Hunger again. Where is Steve McQueen when you need him???

    • Ana A. says:

      Macbeth was the best Macbeth I ever saw. (And I saw a lot.) Yes, it was really artsy and that can be annoying for some, but it was also one of the clearest and most logical interpretations of the play with amazing actors and a stunning cinematography. Not your everyday movie, but worth every cent.

  10. ChocoChipDstryr says:

    He looks really different with brown eyes. I’m digging it.

  11. Jay (the Canadian one) says:

    Assassin’s Creed is not 1st person, it’s 3rd person (chase camera). It does not involve time travel per se either. The concept is a machine called the animus that allows you to relieve the memories of your ancestors as if you were there, through simulation. You have free will while in the simulation but if you don’t do the thing your ancestor did (more or less) you “desync” and have to start the memory from the beginning until you get it right. The reason they do this is to discover information lost to time, such as where some lost artefact was hidden. So it’s a little like Groundhog Day in history or Quantum Leap depending on how much they play up that aspect of it.

  12. Rux says:

    I am an Assassin’s Creed Junkie! Got my Dad hooked on it and we do XBox Live and play together along with Halo — but that’s a different story. I love Fassy however, I do believe he is not the right person for the role.

    Kaiser for you, it’s basically the reincarnation of an assassin through the centuries. As the lead POV clears out a time period, he learns a little bit more of himself and what his mission is; basically unlocking memories through the lives that he has lived through re-incarnation. I am not a Gamer per se but during NYC winters (you can’t go anywhere “super cabin fever”), and B.C.H. (Before Children and Husband) I did get wrapped up in Assassin’s Creed and Halo because the storyline is really great.

    But Fassy as the lead….he’s a really good actor and I enjoy his movies but the “fit” is not the “fit” for him. I would more likely see Toby Kebbell from RocknRolla the Guy Ritchie film as the lead…He has the lankiness and look.

  13. jammypants says:

    “Video game nerds are like comic-book nerds: detail-oriented, passionate about minutiae and just looking to throw a tantrum about something.”

    This truth hahaha! At least he did his homework.

  14. Angie says:

    I still don’t understand why they didn’t do the AC movie about Ezio. He’s the best character in the franchise and they could have hired an Italian stallion to bring him to life…*fans self*

  15. Pondering thoughts says:

    I think that the connection to the video game alone ensures that there will be a lot of media attention to that movie. Apart from hardcore gamers there are also equally many ore even more gamers who wouldn’t mind some differences between movie and game.

    I think it is a good role for Fassenbender. He fits.