Ron Howard defends himself from ‘anti-Catholic’ charges

art directors guild arrivals 150209
Director Ron Howard is fighting back against claims that he is “anti-Catholic”. As the director of The DaVinci Code and the soon-to-be-released Angels & Demons, Howard has been battling charges that he makes anti-Catholic films. One of the Howard’s biggest critics is this guy named William Donohue and his “Catholic League”. Donohue’s main claim to fame is his appearances on Larry King Live and Hardball, where he criticizes anyone and anything who does not move in lock-step with every conservative Catholic dogma.

Donohue has tried to pick fights with everyone from Kathy Griffin to all the Jews in the world. The Catholic League isn’t even an officially sanctioned branch of the Church or anything, it seems to be just a couple of blowhards who issue press releases. Donohue has been yelling about Ron Howard lately, and Donahue even issued a booklet called Angels & Demons: More Demonic Than Angelic. Ron Howard has had enough, and he’s written a statement of defense to The Huffington Post:

William Donohue of the Catholic League is on a mission. Whether it is a “mission from God,” as the Blues Brothers would say, only God knows, but the goal of his mission is clear: to paint me and the movie I directed, Angels & Demons, as anti-Catholic.

For a $5 donation to his organization, Mr. Donohue will send you his glossy new booklet (Angels & Demons: More Demonic Than Angelic), in which he writes that I and the people who made this thriller “do not hide their animus against all things Catholic.”

He’s been making these assertions for years, going back to the theatrical release of The Da Vinci Code. He stepped up his campaign more than a month ago with a series of press releases. And there he goes again, in New York Daily News, saying that Dan Brown and I “have collaborated in smearing the Catholic Church….”

Let me be clear: neither I nor Angels & Demons are anti-Catholic. And let me be a little controversial: I believe Catholics, including most in the hierarchy of the Church, will enjoy the movie for what it is: an exciting mystery, set in the awe-inspiring beauty of Rome. After all, in Angels & Demons, Professor Robert Langdon teams up with the Catholic Church to thwart a vicious attack against the Vatican. What, exactly, is anti-Catholic about that?

Mr. Donohue’s booklet accuses us of lying when our movie trailer says the Catholic Church ordered a brutal massacre to silence the Illuminati centuries ago. It would be a lie if we had ever suggested our movie is anything other than a work of fiction (if it were a documentary, our talk of massacres would have referenced the Inquisition or the Crusades). And if fictional movies could never take liberties with reality, then there would have been no Ben-Hur, no Barabbas, The Robe, Gone With The Wind, or Titanic. Not to mention Splash!

I guess Mr. Donohue and I do have one thing in common: we both like to create fictional tales, as he has done with his silly and mean-spirited work of propaganda.

Mr. Donohue’s op-ed and booklet also suggest that we paint the Church as “anti-reason.” There is plenty of debate over what the Church did or didn’t do with Galileo, but I for one do recognize that the Church did much throughout the ages to encourage and preserve education, the arts and the sciences.

Had Mr. Donohue and his allies waited to see Angels & Demons before criticizing it, they would have seen references to struggles within the Church between faith and science, but they would also have seen clear signs of support for the pursuit of science at the highest levels of the Vatican. Indeed, one of the first scenes of the movie depicts a scientist at the high-tech CERN laboratory…and he is a priest.

And it’s a two-way street. As Dr. Rolf Landua of CERN said during my visit to their facilities in February, “Most physicists which I know are very, very tolerant towards all kinds of religious beliefs, many of them are themselves religious believers….When you look at the scientific way we are looking at these questions, you come to the conclusion that there’s always some part which we cannot explain.”

Even the current “faith vs. science” debate over embryonic stem cells is briefly depicted in Angels & Demons in a balanced way.

But since Mr. Donohue has, in effect, smeared me by claiming I am smearing his Church, I want him to know this: I have respect for Catholics and their Church, and know they accomplish many good works throughout the world. And I believe Angels & Demons treats the Church with respect — even a degree of reverence — for its traditions and beliefs.

I know faith is believing without seeing (and a boycott would be disbelieving without seeing). But I don’t expect William Donohue to have faith in me, so I encourage him to see Angels & Demons for himself. Then he will finally witness, and perhaps believe, that what I say is true.

From The Huffington Post

This statement is very well-written, and I feel the overwhelming urge to yell “Don’t mess with Opie!” Here’s the statement I would have written: “It’s fiction. Get over yourselves, wingnuts.” Do you think The Huffington Post would have published that?

If the Catholic League’s only goal is to get some press, pull out the “mission accomplished” banner. But if their goal is to, oh, I don’t know, stop people from seeing Angels & Demons, they should try not to offer cross-promotional pamphlets! But one of the unexpected consequences of this whole ordeal is that people might actually start talking about the real issues confronting science v. religion, and everything in between. Gasp!

Ron Howard is shown on 2/14/09 at the Directors Guild Awards. Credit: WENN.com
art directors guild arrivals 150209

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

9 Responses to “Ron Howard defends himself from ‘anti-Catholic’ charges”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. heh-heh says:

    Ron Howard has a bigger problem. Some friends and I were talking about what a successful director he was…and none of us could name any of his films. They were all forgettable.

  2. crab says:

    Opie is that you??

  3. Michelle says:

    I am an active Catholic and I have read both of the books The DaVinci Code and Angels and Demons. I think they are great. I wouldn’t want someone who does not know where they stand religiously to read or watch them as it could skew their point of view, but if you know what you believe then by all means I think they can strengthen ones position. They are clearly works of fiction. They each have some fact in them, but that is how all stories are developed. To be honest I think scientists would be more up in arms about Angels and Demons as it makes them seem like power hungry god complexed people (some of the scientists at CERN). I thought The DaVinci code was super and I really only want to go to Rome more since reading and seeing it to see all of the beautiful places discussed and shown.

  4. Obvious says:

    Did they not learn from the Da Vinci Code? all they are doing is piquing our interest and offering free advertisement for these movies. If you ignore them. gotta love the league.

    That being said cannot wait to see this one!

  5. KateNonymous says:

    Good statement, but I still won’t see the movie–not because it’s “anti-Catholic” (I don’t think it or the book is, really), but because the ending of the book drove me nuts. And because I still think Tom Hanks is miscast.

  6. Trillion says:

    heh-heh that’s pretty self important of you to think that Ron Howard’s bigger problem is that you and your friends can’t name any of his movies. I hope you were joking. Cuz like him or not, he’s big time.

  7. I Choose Me says:

    (if it were a documentary, our talk of massacres would have referenced the Inquisition or the Crusades).

    Ooh burn. I am not anti-catholic btw, I just enjoy a well-written article.

    OT: Splash is one of my favourite movies of all time.

    “All of my life, I’ve been waiting for someone and when I find her…she’s a fish.” 🙂

  8. bella mama says:

    cocoon
    parenthood
    backdraft
    a beautiful mind
    ffar and away (okay, that one sucked)
    grand theft auto
    frost/nixon
    splash
    willow
    cinderella man
    how the grinch stole christmas w/jim carrey
    ransom
    apollo 13

    and i’m sure there’s more but those are the ones off the top of my head.

  9. Mike Slade says:

    I just came home from watching the new movie. I’ve never blogged before but I had to write down a new ending.

    At the end, after the new Pope nods to Langdon and receives the Pope hat, at the moment he steps onto the balcony I started laughing. My friends didn’t get it. At that first step onto the balcony I envisioned him leering down and back over his left shoulder only to see the face of Dan Aykroid as Baldar smiling with those pointy teeth and with a sneering evil giggle he turns and moves forward toward the crowd and announces he is Baldar of Romulac and starts to consume mass quantities and blah blah blah with that laugh. I need to see that skit again.

    How can I get Mr. Howard or Mr. Spielberg to let me do a spoof movie? I’m still laughing but I did feel a little stupid because I was the only one laughing in the theatre.