Gisele Bundchen in green Stella McCartney in Milan: gorgeous or plastic?

Green Carpet Fashion Awards Italia 2017 - Arrivals

Milan Fashion Week has been pretty lit this season. Over the weekend, the Versace show featured the OG supermodels like Naomi Campbell, Cindy Crawford, Claudia Schiffer, Carla Bruni and Helena Christensen, plus it seems like all of the nepotism models are in Milan right now and they all got high-profile runway gigs. Milan Fashion Week also featured the Green Carpet Fashion Awards, and these are some of the photos from that event. Gisele was one of the big names there, and she wore this Stella McCartney dress. Shock of shocks… I think this is perhaps one of the best McCartney dresses I’ve ever seen. Granted, Gisele could make a paper bag look glamorous, and I’m sure that will be Stella’s next project. Also: I f–king LOVE how we’re not even supposed to say anything about Gisele’s obvious face work. Girl has gotten a mountain of plastic surgery in the past few years.

Green Carpet Fashion Awards Italia 2017 - Arrivals

Here’s Anna Wintour and Francesco Carrozzini. Shock of shocks, Wintour didn’t wear Chanel!! She wore Tom Ford and the change was amazing. This is maybe the best frock she’s ever worn.

Green Carpet Fashion Awards Italia 2017 - Arrivals

Naomi Campbell in Versace. If you told me this was a photo from 1999, I would believe you. She doesn’t age and her style is either timeless and perfectly dated.

Green Carpet Fashion Awards 2017 - Arrivals

Here’s Dakota Johnson in Gucci. I don’t really care for this dress (AT ALL) but I’m enjoying the changed-up styling. I prefer her without bangs, obviously. The makeup seems a little bit harsh, but I also think the lighting wasn’t that great in these photos.

Green Carpet Fashion Awards Italia 2017 - Arrivals

Green Carpet Fashion Awards Italia 2017 - Arrivals

Photos courtesy of WENN.

 

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

43 Responses to “Gisele Bundchen in green Stella McCartney in Milan: gorgeous or plastic?”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Astrid says:

    Did Giselle forget to have her hair done? Anna looks fantastic

  2. Kata says:

    Anna’s dress looks like every dress she’s ever worn. The change of designer didn’t do anything.

    Naomi looks beautiful but dated.

    Dakota looks a million times better with bangs. The bob with bangs she had last year was hands down her best haircut.

  3. Snazzy says:

    Dakota’s dress is horrible, and Naomi is magnificent, even with those god awful yellow feathers.

  4. Laura says:

    Dakota, girl, what is that dress??

  5. Alix says:

    Gisele’s dress is simple but pretty. Love the color. Hate to say it, but Naomi’s had a ton done to her face as well.

    Anna’s ensemble’s also good. Now how about ditching those pretentious shades?

    Dakota’s dress — horrific.

  6. Alleycat says:

    I know when women look beautiful we say they look younger, but Naomi looks great for her age. She does not look 20 years younger though, lets be real. She has a banging body and great skin, but she looks her age (and still fantastic). It’s such a pet peeve of mine. I do think Dakota looks better with bangs. Some of us (like me) have weird or large foreheads, and need something to help cover it up.

    • Sarah L says:

      I saw Naomi in person recently, and you are right. She does look like a woman in her 40′s, but she looks like the most amazing 40 something you have ever seen. I thinks its better to look your age and completely rock it than attempt to look 30 forever.

  7. Dr Snark says:

    The lighting seems to be a big part of the problem for Dakota and Giselle. Naomi has the enviable talent of being impervious to 1) age and 2) bad lighting.

  8. marc kile says:

    Just my opinion but Gisele is not a good looking women without photo shop. There i said it.

  9. Megan says:

    Naomi must be a vampire. There is no other explanation for her agelessness. She is stunning.

  10. Zondie says:

    The idea of constantly fighting the inevitable fact of aging seems tedious. But then maybe it’s a small price to pay for skating by most of your life on your beauty.

  11. Becks says:

    I don’t love Gisele’s face/makeup or hair (I like it down, but think it could have looked brushed….or something) but that dress is gorgeous. Simple design, great color, and she has the body to take it from “pretty” to amazing.

  12. Bridget says:

    I love Dakota’s dress.

    Did Carlo Bruni ever officially divorce Sarkozy?

  13. Electric Tuba says:

    Mrs. Football Dude looks boring and in need of a wash.
    Naomi looks typical for Naomi minus the fact that she’s beaten an ostrich with a phone and catwalked through its feathers right before this event.
    Fifty Shades of Meh maven has sparkler boobies and that’s not interesting enough to make that hair color work on her.
    The Thing From The Vogue Lagoon remains a monster

    Super Monday Mood

  14. AnnaKist says:

    I don’t know the first thing about fashion – high or otherwise. I like what I like, whether it’s in or out. I really like the simplicity of GB’s dress, and the colour is beautiful. I’ve never been a fan of hers, but by golly, her new face is a bit how’s-yer-father. I hate all the other dresses, but as I said, I’m no fashionista. Geez, when will AW stop with the sunglasses-at-night-indoors? She only looks ridiculous.

  15. Honey says:

    Giseles dress is plain but I still love it. It should be a crime to wear a dress as bad as Dakotas.

    Has Anna always had that hairstyle? She never looks different, always the same exact hair, sunglasses, and wears the same style dress at every event. Time for her to change

  16. Twink says:

    Naomi is a stunning goddess. Dakota looks like Pennywise!

  17. lucy2 says:

    I like the green dress, it’s pretty, especially for a Stella.
    Anna’s is pretty but kinda boring. Naomi looks amazing, but the dress is too much for me.

    Dakota. Good Lord. She looks…different, and the hair color is not her most flattering, but I’m assuming it’s for a role. The top of that dress is HEINOUS. I actually like the skirt, and if it would have carried up to be a whole bodice in that material/design, I may have liked it overall, but the daisy boobs or whatever they are, NO.

  18. Annabelle Bronstein says:

    Y’all I think I might love Dakota’s Gucci. It looks like she was going for Dita Von Teese but nobody does DVT better than herself.

  19. mayamae says:

    Didn’t Gisele once have a waist?

  20. PP says:

    CB readers: I know this article is strange, but you have to remember this writer is a feminist. Yes, I know she always sounds bitter and she always attacks ‘plastic’ women, but she is a feminist. And Trump is a feminist. You don’t believe me? If this writer is a feminist… who is NOT a feminist?
    Sorry, I’m tired of reading articles like this. Her face looks very natural. But Naomi… Well, not so much. But don’t worry, CB readers I will not say anything about Naomi, I have nothing against plastic surgery and I’m not jealous or bitter.
    They look beautiful.

  21. Paris says:

    OMG! Look at Anna Wintour’s SHOES! Wow! I am impressed. REALLY IMPRESSED!
    Anna Wintour always wears the same shoes – Manolo Blahnik! Not this time … Wow!

  22. Nibbi says:

    K first the thing is that Gisele has obviously had work done around her eyes, perhaps a hair too harsh, but otherwise, yeah, grudging respect for still looking like herself.

    Dakota’s dress is HEINOUS and the top is the most unflattering thing i’ve ever seen.

    naomi is indeed fairly ageless and always looks amazing but c’mon, she too has had some kinda brow lift or something, it’s obvious. perhaps she and gisele have the same surgeon, it’s a hair too harsh/ obvious.

    anna wintour just always looks frighteningly severe to me, with her impeccable bob that never moves. i thought part of having amazing style and being , like, a Vogue fashionista was changing your look at least every 20 years. i mean they’re the ones pushing new trends and products and all the shizz we’re supposed to buy all the time.