Jennifer Aniston: Love is about relinquishing control, except not

Jennifer Aniston sat down with CNN for a quickie little four-and-a-half minute interview, and nothing much happens. I mean, of course, “love happens” because that’s the name of her movie, get it? I have to say this – Jennifer Aniston has been building her whole life for this promotional tour. Her sort of girlish ruminations on “love happening” and all of the cloying questions about making relationships work, it’s all right up her self-help alley. Here’s a transcript of part of the interview… note how quickly she backtracks when the reporter comes close to saying her ruminations contradict what Oprah teaches:

CNN: What does it take to make love happen?
JA: I think you have to relinquish control. As I don’t think it’s something you can control or really choose. You know, it sorta of chooses you.
CNN: Being open to it…
JA: Being open to it and being open to what form it comes in, what package it’s delivered to you in… and people have ways, ‘Well, it’s supposed to look like this’ or ‘No, I won’t do this’. They have all these rules already sorta preset ideas of what the person’s supposed to be, how it’s supposed to be, when it’s supposed to be, all of these plans…and then…
CNN: And then you’ve got Oprah out there telling you make a list of every single thing you want, and it’ll come to you.
JA: I think that’s different than… but it’s not about what you…what you want, the quality of the person – a kind person, a funny person, you know, a nurturing person.

[Transcribed from CNN Video]

So you shouldn’t have a preset idea of what love is going to look like (when it “happens”) except when Oprah tells you to make a list of everything you want in a man, and how you should reject any guy who doesn’t match up to the list? Aniston is giving me a tension headache.

There is some confusion when the CNN reporter asks her about her interview in Australian Harper’s Bazaar (which we covered Monday), when she was asked “Why do you think the romance goes out of a relationship?” Her response at the time was: “I think it’s laziness. I really do. I think a good relationship is about collaboration. That’s the way to go in a relationship. I think you just need to talk to each other. Say what you need. Say what you want. That way it’s not threatening. You just need to say, ‘This is important to me.’ Don’t expect your mate to read your mind.”

Jennifer got confused when the CNN reporter asked her about her “lazy” comment from Bazaar, and she says she thought she said it to Elle. She might have – she says a lot of the same stuff in most of her interviews, but the first and only time I think I’ve ever read her blaming “laziness” on a relationship’s decline was in Bazaar. In the CNN interview, Aniston agrees with herself, saying “Well, I think that with anything, if you’re lazy it withers and dies. Your work… your flowers…love. It all takes attention to… things.” Dude… she listed flowers before love. Classic.

The CNN reporter also asks her at one point about the Elle/Bazaar (who knows at this point) quote, where Jennifer was asked, “Do you think that women in general do too much in relationships?” Jennifer replied: “Oh yeah. I think that’s because it’s just instinctual as a woman to be the caretaker of your home. Women complain that men don’t do enough, but it’s your own fault. You train your man to do nothing. You can’t blame someone for not knowing what his or her job should be if you don’t ask for it right off the bat.”

In the CNN interview, Jennifer comes close to disagreeing with herself on that point, saying “I think not ‘too much’ maybe just working hard to allow a man to feel comfortable in a room. Sort of. Um… women can do too much, over-doting on somebody, like you’re selling a car, when you’re just in a relationship.” “Over-doting” is my new favorite verb. Must. Use. Today.

Jennifer talks more about “love happening” in her normal hippie-dippy self-help-speak. I mean, yeah, some of what she’s saying I agree with, but only because she’s just regurgitating clichés that are clichés for a reason, you know? You have to “learn how to be vulnerable” and “love isn’t easy”. Please, more pearls of wisdom, Mahatma Aniston!

Towards the end of the interview, she sort of goes off on a tangent talking about “love happening” and she says, “It’s not the longevity of a relationship that… that, uh, that shows it’s success, I think it’s the… you know… you have a really positive two-year experience that really taught you something, I don’t think that determines the success or failure.” When was Jennifer’s last two-year relationship again?

Here’s Jennifer on the set of The Bounty in Queens, NY on 8/24/09. Images thanks to WENN.com .

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

56 Responses to “Jennifer Aniston: Love is about relinquishing control, except not”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Jen says:

    That dress is really pretty…

  2. Heavenbound says:

    Oh no here we go again!… You just love to post her, because she just strikes a cord with all the crazy’s.

  3. cee says:

    She is going to be manless for a while until she learns to be more of a giver and not a taker.

  4. Laura says:

    I’m still waiting for the post on her paying every crew member’s salary (from the Bounty) out of her own pocket for the Thursday preceding the Fourth of July weekend so that they could have four consecutive days of vacation. Maybe it was too positive of a story?

  5. Granger says:

    You know I love me some Kaiser, especially when the article is about Aniston or the ex, but I can’t help thinking this was an awfully long analysis of a 4-1/2 minute interview…

  6. Munkey says:

    Heavenbound: LOL, spot on.

  7. lisa says:

    Hell what is there to comment on.. nothing.. she said nothing..

  8. alex says:

    all I have to say is “WOW” lol

  9. Karie says:

    The more she opens her mouth, the more idiotic she sounds. I can’t believe this girl has fans! I really can’t. Are her fans equally brain dead? Or, is Aniston just cute/non-threatening? I don’t get it. And, before you jump on me and call me a Jolie lover, I’d like to say I’m not a fan of any famewhores and that includes BOTH Aniston and Jolie last time I looked.

  10. Karie says:

    Takes one to know one Heavenbound.
    I find the people defending this amazing dullard equally crazy.

  11. lem says:

    @ granger- that is what i thought.

    i think interviewers need to stop treating her like she’s the advice goddess on relationships. there is more to her than her love life and it’d be nice if the interviewers treated her as such.

  12. whatever says:

    “Please, more pearls of wisdom, Mahatma Aniston!” haha–very funny, Kaiser.

    Everything she says sounds like a cliche from a self-help book. I don’t believe she has had ONE original thought. Megan Fox is starting to sound unique, by comparison. Same cliches, same movies, same hair, same clothing style–dull, dull, dull.

  13. Lacy says:

    Lem, she’s doing “ROMANCE” movies–what is she supposed to talk about–the Middle East? If that’s the topic of your movie, you will be asked about it. But she doesn’t have to answer the interviewer. She could make a cute little joke–have you seen the guys I’ve been dating lately?–and then move on. But, I doubt she has anything to say about anything else either.

  14. Snoopchew says:

    She should just learn to be lonely. At least until she has a little wisdom regarding relationships.
    She is such a ditz! Too materialistic.

  15. Heavenbound says:

    Kaire:

    *Yawn* is that all your ammunition?… how elementary.

  16. DD says:

    She is just playing it safe, giving answers that are positive media pleasers about the same tired old subject of all her movies: LOVE.
    The lady was burned several times, does anyone really expect nuggets of honesty and wisdom from her on a subject her career depends on?

  17. Teri says:

    If Jen really knew anything on this subject she’d be happily in a relationship by now. What is she doing wrong?

  18. Beth says:

    This has got to be the most boring promotional tour. All of the questions are the same. I feel like Jennifer’s pr team gave the interviewers 10 questions they must select from.

  19. larawinn says:

    It’s the same boring promotional tour b/c it’s the same boring kind of movie. Have you seen previews? It’s got all the standard Jen Aniston qualities: Cheating boyfriend, check. Can’t find the right man, check. Gorgeous, sensitive, available (conveniently) man, check. Fall in love hesitantly, check. Throw in a “big misunderstanding” that makes it look like it’s over, but then oh wait…they end up together. It looks terrible and boring as hell. Life is to short for me to wast 120 minutes of my life on this kind of crap.

  20. Ana says:

    Aniston is so smart. Except not.

  21. Sani says:

    Teri you are so right.
    If a person don’t have a car why listen to them tell you how to take care of a car. If a person had a car and messed their car up why listen to that fool tell you about how to take care of your car.
    Do not want her advice. Don’t want to see her move. She is too superficial to stomach for over 10 minutes.

  22. Andrea says:

    something about her is really bugging me these days. dont care for brangelina either. just sayin, JA, i dunno, something annoyingly get-some-girl-power-already about her. of course i dont know her personally at all, but when i see her, i never see some SPINE. i think her best quote was calling angelina uncool. at least that had some spunk. overall though, anybody looking to celebs for relationship advice is looking in the wrong place.

  23. Josephina says:

    I listened to the CNN interview… all I can say is….it is what it is.

    Saying something positive…she is cute and I like her hair.

  24. boomchakaboom says:

    She’s like someone who can’t stay in the saddle giving riding lessons.

  25. Karie says:

    Yeah, your comeback is SO scintillating, Heavenbound. Aniston fans and boring are just about synonymous.

    BTW, learn how to spell. It’s Karie not Kaire, chord not cord, and crazies not crazy’s. Speaking of “elementary”–maybe, you should consider going back to school.

  26. Heavenbound says:

    Karie:

    You sound like an angry B*tch! I am glad to know that you are the spelling police if this site.

    Aniston is a woman with a multi-million dollar career and does not care what you think, nor do I.

    Bitter much?

  27. Heavenbound says:

    …. Like I said Karie, it brings the crazies out!

  28. Karie says:

    Oh geez, the “bitter” comeback! I’m so HURT–haha. Your comment is right up there with “you’re JUST jealous!” or “get a life, loser,”–just the same cliched replies from someone with no mental ammunition. But, then again, what can I expect from someone who worships the Queen of cliches?

  29. Get a dictionary says:

    Agree or disagree, but the careless use of the word “crazy” to describe someone you don’t agree with, or someone who threatens you, needs to stop. It’s especially heinous when it’s woman to woman, mimicking the men. It reveals a mindlessness, a thoughtless parroting of the latest internet invective without any sense of the word’s genuine meaning.

  30. Heavenbound says:

    DEFINITION OF CRAZY: mentally deranged, esp. as manifested in a wild or aggressive way.

    That sounds like you! Please read your threads again, you come across like an unhappy person. Picking a fight in a blog is so pathetic.

    I am embarrassed for you, and since I am sane, I will no longer reply to your ridicules comments.

    Good night.

  31. trainwreck says:

    The interviewer is being naughty. Pretty funny. She’s so clumsy and vapid. It’s painful to watch and fascinating to watch. She has nothing to say on this. What does she expect when she keeps doing these movies. It’s all so cynical. She does the only genre that seems to work for her, yet seems resentful when asked the inevitable questions. This comes off like it’s her first interview, couldn’t she have at least prepared some semi-interesting replies. C’mon, she’s got more money than she’ll ever need. What’s the point in playing it safe. Take a chance, do something interesting. It’s infuriating to see someone like her who is financially secure but takes no chances. And that doesn’t mean more half naked photo shoots. More by-the-numbers cliches. She just keeps doing the same old and what’s the point. For the attention that she then says she resents? So the men controlling her career can keep making money off her? Sheesh.

  32. Karie says:

    Haha, Heavenbound, you’re responding to another poster! I think calling someone crazy SPEAKS VOLUMES ABOUT YOU, and not anyone else. I’m here having fun, but you’re the one who has become all worked up about Jennifer Aniston of all people. Haha. But you started it, saying people who comment on Aniston are “crazy’s”. You get out of life what you give, sweetie!

  33. Celebitchy says:

    This is exactly why Aniston has trouble in relationships. She believes in leaving it all up to chance. This is insane when compared to her very deliberate approach to her career. If you want a good relationship, you have to define what you’re looking for in a partner and have criteria for someone before you start dating. Then you have to deliberately start dating. It’s not neurosurgery, as Aniston would say. *You do need rules!* You can’t just fly by the seat of your damn pants and think love is some magical sh*t that will hit you when you least expect it and come in any old package, that’s how you end up with assh*les like John Mayer. She’s said variations of this in the past and it’s absolutely wrong.

    -edit- Also, with Jennifer Aniston, she really needs to establish a rapport with an interviewer in order to feel comfortable and give good responses. She was wonderful on Oprah, but not that good on Letterman, for instance. This guy threw her a lot of curveballs and you could tell that she was uncomfortable and just trying to get by. These celebrities do like tens of interviews in a day on these press tours. It can’t be easy. Yes that’s their job, but could you do it? We don’t get paid millions for a few weeks work, but these are different skillsets – acting and being able to come up with good interview answers on the fly.

  34. Rosanna says:

    I usually can’t stand Aniston. However this piece of advice is one of the few that makes actual sense.
    Love is not like going to the market and buying a product. Love *happens* in that you either are in love with a person or you’re not, no matter how closely he matches your checklist.
    Checklists can be useful in relationships, when you decide whether to be in a relationship or not.
    But you definitely can’t decide who to fall for, unless you’re so delusional to think that what you like (ie the checklist) is what you’re going to love.

  35. Celebitchy says:

    Rosanna, a lot of cheating spouses would agree with you, including Jon Gosselin:
    http://www.celebitchy.com/69533/jon_gosselin_i_love_soulmate_hailey_glassman_more_than_kate/

  36. Praise St. Angie! says:

    “I think calling someone crazy SPEAKS VOLUMES ABOUT YOU, and not anyone else.”

    Karie, YOU called someone “crazy” too.

    as well as “idiotic” and “brain dead”.

    does that speak volumes about YOU, too?

  37. Sudini says:

    I just don’t get what all the fuss is about. I think some people (the easily programmable kind)are so used to beating up on certain people that they try to find fault with anything that person says, no matter HOW inane. Jennifer Anniston gets the same questions from just about every interviewer I’ve read/seen/heard. And to be fair, I don’t remember her ever claiming to be an expert on love/relationships – these are just her opinions and things she’s gathered from her own life experiences. And really, REALLY not note-worthy or anything to be judged. De-program yourselves haters..there’s nothing to hate here.

  38. Wow says:

    Sudini: The Voice of Reason. Very impressed with the maturity of your post, Sudini.

    In Jen’s line of profession, I know she has to do these interviews. But I think she should just not bother to set herself up with any relationship talk. This would be a difficult stance as most of her movies as of late deal with romance/relationships, but still. It’s as if she’s damned if she does and damned if she doesn’t.

  39. Sudini says:

    Aww, thanks Wow. And I agree – she really does seem damed if she does/damned if she doesn’t. I’d like to see her cast in a completely different genre – maybe horror or psych thriller. It’d be interesting to see how that might play out..

  40. Guest says:

    Celebitchy, you may have a point that it would be nice to develop a rapport with reporters and that would help with the interview for celebrities. However, I think you and most people fail to give Jen the benefit of the doubt that 1) she actually is a fairly private person all things considered, and 2) she gets trashed so much through misquotes and the use of her soundbites that she is probably approaching many an interview with a strong degree of wariness.

    Obviously the topics of love, loss and relationships are going to be addressed in a press junket for a movie called “Love Happens.” But few people will be reading into Aaron Eckhart’s quotes on these topics to see if they can find whether they offer insight to his past high-profile marriage/divorce/relationships, or whether they offer reasons why he is still single and can’t keep a woman. Jen seems to me to be keeping things fairly neutral when asked about these topics probably in the hopes that people like Kaiser and yourself won’t pick them apart and use a sentence here or there to claim this is why she is single, etc.

    We’ll have to agree to disagree on Jen not having a rapport with Letterman. But I find it predictable that Celebitchy chose to post this interview from Jen’s press junket and not one of the many others such as GMA, E!, Access Hollywood or Extra that were released yesterday that showed Jen having a great rapport with both the interviewers (most of whom she has interviewed with previously), and her co-star, and providing much more insightful commentary and funny banter to dissect for Kaiser to dissect ad naseum.

  41. binc says:

    what a stupid interview. what idiotic questions. and she is trying to answer seriously? so silly.

  42. hmm says:

    Why can’t people just be honest and admit that she comes across sounding a little foolish and out of her depth? I really don’t understand because we usually ridicule celebs for the foolish or trite answers they give but with Aniston, she’s treated like she’s the slow girl in class that’s given a pass because she’s incapable of doing better. Ahh, that’s good Jen. You really are handy with those cliches. Good girl! If Gwyneth had given these same answers, the same people defending Aniston would have been eviscerating Paltrow for her Goopiness.

  43. Cheyenne says:

    Celebitchy: These celebrities do like tens of interviews in a day on these press tours. It can’t be easy. Yes that’s their job, but could you do it? We don’t get paid millions for a few weeks work, but these are different skillsets – acting and being able to come up with good interview answers on the fly.
    ************************************************

    At her age, and after doing umpteen-zillion interviews on the fly, yes, I would expect her to be able to manage a more adult level of communication than “um… yeah… yanno… ” I’ve seen teenagers with a better level of communicatoin skills than she has.

  44. Anak says:

    She is so lucky! Always with a hot guy!

  45. lacy says:

    I agree hmmm, there’s a double standard here. People make so many excuses for Jen, but I remember many of these same posters calling Brad a moron, Gwyneth a haughty b*itch, trashing Heigl and everyone else. YET, when someone critiques Jen for her own statements, then the same people become incredibly defensive, calling us “haters,” etc. The blatant dbl standard is annoying.

  46. DD says:

    “You train your man to do nothing. You can’t blame someone for not knowing what his or her job should be if you don’t ask for it right off the bat.”

    OMG is she serious?? I can’t beleive she said that. I know if Goopy or hiegl would’ve said that, people would be slammin them. Her fans are so hypocritical.

  47. Cheyenne says:

    Anak: She is so lucky! Always with a hot guy!
    ***********************************************

    Good lord, how old are you? Thirteen and a half? Most people would not consider getting constantly laid, played, humped and dumped as being “lucky”, never mind how hot the guys are.

  48. lem says:

    the different is that if a married actor/actress had given the exact same answers that she did, it wouldn’t have been dissected at all because they are “happily married.” she gets dissected to bits because she’s single and people see that as being some sort of defect in her.

  49. lurker says:

    funny…the posters who seem to have the most hate for Jen are ALSO the same people who heap praise on Angelina.

    but nooooooooooooooo, none of you are still obsessed with the past, like you hammer others for being. none of you rush to make some hateful comment about Aniston when there’s a thread about her, all the while claiming that you don’t have anything against her.

    you brangeloonies are so fucking transparent.

  50. kim says:

    It’s NOT b/c she’s single. There are many single women who don’t get the same scrutiny. Look at Cameron Diaz– she dates, looks happy, doesn’t want marriage/kids yet, and people don’t bother her that much. Why? Diaz doesn’t talk about her love life, bfs in interviews, and doesn’t do red carpets w/bfs. Diaz sells her work not her love life to the media. BIG DIFFERENCE.

  51. luckyme says:

    Yeah, the reason we dislike her is because she’s single! So, people who dislike her are women haters? Please! IMO, Aniston is not that talented + barely articulate. She has money, but so what? I’m not materialistic. Sorry, I don’t admire her. I don’t have this idea that she’s this amazing strong woman others see. I see a fake blonde ditz. Just another bad actress, imo

  52. Zarah says:

    This woman is so bland it’s unreal. There is nothing remotely interesting about her or her movies. If it weren’t for her infamous relationships, she would have faded into the background right along with all the other Friends cast.

  53. cole says:

    The last two posters sound like real winners. You see a fake, blonde ditz who isn’t remotely interesting? Do you actually KNOW her to say any of these things??? You two sound like petty, jealous, bitter lonely woman. It’s real easy to hide behind your computer and spit your snark out at others.

  54. luckyme says:

    Cole, do YOU KNOW ANYONE HERE to call them “petty, jealous, bitter lonely”? What a hypocrite! I just read her ditzy interview, and that’s what she sounds like, imo. Isn’t that what EVERYONE here does? Somehow, no one gets upset when I do the same w/ Goopy. In fact, they all agree. Sorry my opinion doesn’t agree w/yours. It’s all about how you see things, isn’t it?

  55. boomchakaboom says:

    I’m not even sure Aniston is freakin’ CONSCIOUS.

  56. 4Real says:

    I think Jennifer Aniston ranks right up there with Drew Barrymore, Cameron Diaz, and Kate Hudson. Cute but boring…….