Sarah and Bristol Palin and their babies on In Touch: ‘We’re glad we chose life’

intouchcover
This week’s In Touch features mother daughter team Sarah and Bristol Palin holding up their babies with the title “We’re glad we chose life.” Jezebel has some highlights from the article, and it sounds like the typical “life at home” interview complete with plenty of cute photos. There’s some mild introspection from Bristol, who comes across as a well grounded and self aware young woman. The pro-life message, as positive as it is with the babies and family pictures, should have been saved for the end of the article. The title just makes me bristle. Why can’t they show off their little ones without making it political? Plus, so much of that pro-life material tries to make women feel guilty so that they won’t have an abortion. They could alternately title this cover “We kept our babies – did you?” Still, this In Touch cover might be considered an improvement over last week’s “Jealous Rage Over Jen!” or “Angelina’s Revenge Pregnancy” from three weeks ago.

Sarah, 45, and Bristol, 19, are raising their sons Trig, 21 months, and Tripp, who turned one on December, together in the same home. Sarah found out during a prenatal checkup that her son Trig would be born with Down syndrome. She chose to take the pregnancy to term and mentioned in her new biography Going Rogue that she very briefly considered abortion. She later made the very misleading and misinformed statement that the new health care plan would include “death panels” that mete out care according to patients’ contribution to society, and might chose not to treat her child. “The America I know and love is not one in which my parents or my baby with Down Syndrome will have to stand in front of Obama’s ‘death panel’ so his bureaucrats can decide, based on a subjective judgment of their ‘level of productivity in society,’ whether they are worthy of health care. Such a system is downright evil.” Oh Sarah, you know just enough to warp things beyond recognition.

In their much less polarizing In Touch interview, Sarah said that Bristol takes responsibility for raising Tripp while Bristol mildly yearned for the things she may be missing out on by becoming a mother so young.

On raising their boys together
Now, the mother and daughter are sharing a unique experience — raising baby boys together under the same roof, along with Sarah’s husband, Todd, and their other children, Willow, 15, and Piper, 8.

While Sarah is extremely proud of Bristol, she hasn’t coddled her or taken over mothering duties. She lets Bristol learn and make mistakes on her own, and it’s understood that Bristol will support Tripp financially as much as possible — which means buying her own diapers and formula.

“There’s no mistaking that Tripp is her baby, and she is in charge,” Sarah explains. “this whole experience has made her grow up so quickly , but she has taken total responsibility and never gripes about it.”

Bristol on the difficulties of motherhood
“Tripp is the love of my life — I couldn’t ask for a better baby,” she insists. “But the reality is I’m 19 years old and I have a one-year-old. I wish I could be in my 20s with a baby and not be in my 20s. Just having him so young — I have to work, and I have to provide for him, because I’m a single mom.”

Having Tripp so young was a mistake, Bristol admits: “I should have waited.” but she can’t imagine her life without him. “Tripp is awesome,” she says. “It’s going to be a special relationship, a special bond. I’m glad I chose life.”

Bristol on dealing with the split from Levi Johnston
After she gave birth to her son, Tripp, in December 2008 — and broke up with her boyfriend, Levi Johnston — the reality of single motherhood quickly set in. “I remember sitting on a black recliner, just bawling my eyes out,” Bristol tells In Touch. “I was just rocking Tripp to sleep because he had been screaming for so long. I was just like, ‘What am I going to do? This is as bad as it gets.”

[From In Touch Weekly compiled via Jezebel and In Touch’s Website]

Sarah’s baby Trig has congenital heart defects and some medical problems associated with his condition that seem to be well managed. He’s doing pretty well, according to the article. My favorite photo that’s been leaked online is one of Trig and Tripp sitting on rocking horses in the living room and smiling at each other. You can tell that they’re good friends.

It really strikes me that Bristol Palin has barely sought the spotlight since her mother’s campaign. While her famewh*re ex boyfriend has been posing in Playgirl and trash-talking her mom to any outlet that will have him, Bristol has held her tongue and raised her son in virtual silence. It’s nice to see a relatively neutral, positive interview in which she focuses on her life as a mom. Bristol has really come out on top in this whole drama-filled debacle.

In Touch images via Popeater and Jezebel

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

96 Responses to “Sarah and Bristol Palin and their babies on In Touch: ‘We’re glad we chose life’”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. DrM says:

    I can’t think of more appropriate spokespeople for the anti-choice movement…and the movement is welcome to them…

  2. ♥Natalie♥ says:

    Those poor babies have such horrible names.

  3. BitterBetty says:

    Their names are the least of their problems.

  4. SageAdvice says:

    Bristol is the only one in this who debacle that seemed to have her head on straight. She even talked about how expecting teens to be abstinent wasn’t realistic…and then was told to get back on the Palin Talking Points, so she back-tracked.

    Anyway, choosing to keep a child is a personal decision that I don’t think anyone should be judged for. It all depends on your needs at the time and the level of support you have. Bristol may be buying some of those diapers but you can bet that her mother and father pick up the slack whenever she can’t be there (like when she’s working).

    She’s lucky to have a wide-ranging support system which some people just don’t have and would be a major contributing factor to someone deciding to end a pregnancy.

  5. MooMooMooMooMoo. says:

    I’m glad I chose to not be a slut anymore so I don’t have to have an abortion OR a baby!

  6. Rosalee says:

    Actually Bristol did make the round of talk shows. She talked about abstaining from sex and she wished that she would have waited, rather then have a baby at a young age.

  7. QB says:

    Who cares , this are just another bunch of idiots with kids. Didn’t Sarah was mad at the press for talking about her kids but then she goes out of her way to use them for her political agenda and personal gain. Plus Bristol does not fool me with her “I’m a single mom and I have to support him”.

  8. Tazina says:

    I wish they had chosen getting lost so we don’t have to see or hear them anymore. That would be even better.

  9. Danielle says:

    It’s great to chose life, but not every one has a mommy with loads of money so they can continue school and not even have to care for the baby.

  10. April says:

    “I wish I could be in my 20s with a baby and not be in my 20s.”

    What Bristol? Which one do you want, to be in your 20s with a baby or not?

  11. GatsbyGal says:

    I still think that down syndrome kid is secretly Bristol’s.

    And WTF, “We’re glad we chose life” – it’s a magazine cover, not a church-funded billboard. How snotty can you get. They’re practically shouting their moral superiority over women who had opted to have an abortion.

    I bet you ANYTHING Bristol wishes she could’ve had an abortion. But with Sarah Palin as a mom, there was absolutely no chance of that happening.

  12. Jocelina says:

    That title made me bristle, too. I mean, I’m glad they both chose life, because it was clearly the choice they each wanted to make, and I’m pro-choice. But I agree that that message should have been saved for the article, rather than blazoned on the cover.

  13. anon says:

    If Bristol Palen wants to have 10 kids before she is 30, that’s great. However, her mother backs Abstinence Only and her own daughter is living proof that it doesn’t work. People don’t really abstain and then end up getting pregnant. I’ve seen it with my own friends in high school. Not everyone has rich well connected parents, most people have to go to school and get an education so they don’t end up broke, in a bad neighborhood with no health insurance. You have to take care of the kids after you have them!

  14. annie says:

    #13 that’s a pretty viscious statement.

  15. Gwyn says:

    because when they show off babies on magazine covers without a pollitical msg attatched to it it’s calld pimping, that’s why CB.

  16. bite me says:

    fun fact: Bristol started a pr firm

  17. sayrah says:

    Why is this statement on the cover of the magazine? Good for you, but yeah, keep it in the article.

  18. Cuntastic says:

    Who cares what they did? “Leave my family alone!” But let me get a cover story on this stupid magazine…

  19. Kaye says:

    Gah! I loath Sarah Palin. This just reeks of the b.s. that people who are pro-choice hate babies. I’m pro-choice but if my daughter were to get pregnant when she’s a teenager, I would want her to have it because we have the resources necessary to raise that baby. Not everyone is so lucky.

  20. QB says:

    Who would want a Palin to do their PR?? , Bristol is 19 and the only experience she haves in the field is the nightmare of the McCain Campaing , what having a parent with money does, you can be anything you want to without going to college or having work experience in that field.

  21. Praise St. Angie! says:

    a few of you have said what I was going to say.

    it’s wonderful that they’re happy with their CHOICE to have the babies.

    but not every woman who faces that CHOICE has the same support (financial/familial) that Bristol Palin has.

    what is best for one woman is NOT (necessarily) what’s best for the next.

    EDIT: to Cuntastic, excellent point. Can’t have it both ways, Sarah. either keep them out of the public eye or stop your whining when the public has an opinion on them.

  22. LolaBella says:

    Hmmm, coincidence that this is coming out as Sarah begins her tenure as a Fox contributor? NO! This cover is great publicity and exposure to her target audience.

    Trig and Tripp…the names! Yikes.

    The idea of abstinence is all fine and well; the reality is that it is UNREALISTIC, IMHO.

  23. Peach says:

    Oh, the rich white girl chose life? Well fantastic. Your baby is really very cute. Most babies are cute. Even black babies born to mothers who cannot afford them, they’re cute too.

    But they don’t get a Hero’s Cover.Proudly displaying their choice for the world to congratulate them on. Really.

    Where is the story on the single woman who lives in the projects and had her baby and raised herself up, went to school, held down two jobs, worked her ass off and somehow came out the other side wiser and better?

    Nope. Instead we get this. Yeah, having a baby is always hard. But having a baby in a giant home you don’t have to pay for when you’re getting paid large sums just to appear in photos…I’m sorry…but boo fucking hoo.

    If they want to promote their clear anti-choice message that’s fine. But to act as though they deserve any kind of accolades makes me sick.
    Fuck. That. Noise.

  24. Praise St. Angie! says:

    oh, Peach…how I love your posts!

  25. Goddess711 says:

    Gurp!

  26. ,,,, says:

    Preach it Peach!!

  27. DrM says:

    @ Peach to quote Wayne’s World “we’re not worthy!!!….” (great post!)

  28. snowball says:

    Peach, I couldn’t agree with you more.

    I don’t care if someone’s personal decision is pro-choice, pro-life or pro-bestiality. Get your opinion out of my face.

    These two make my skin crawl, but Sarah has more reason to be featured than her daughter. She’s dealing with a handicapped child and of course, wants to push her show. Sticking Bristol on there too is just ridiculous.

    She got knocked up, had the baby, broke up with his daddy, lives comfortably with mommy and daddy and wants to tell us (like we haven’t heard it a zillion times lately) how much having a baby changed her life, how she loves him so much but raising him alone is tough.

    Gee, thanks for the alert, Bristol. I’m sure all the struggling moms who can’t even afford to buy the magazine because every penny goes to living expenses would find your story so inspiring.

    Gah.

  29. dude says:

    Peach who cares that they are white? Other than you!! Their babies are sweet. Especially Trig, he has such innocents in his eyes. Babies with downs are so sweet & loving!! They are very special! I think that its great how she talks about him, shares him with the public. DO you know any celebrity who has a baby with any kind of mental/health illness. No one famous would keep a baby with downs. Im sure lots of celebrities have had a abortions just to avoid it. So the public/media doesnt mock it. I will say that choosing to not abort you mental challenged baby is something to be rewarded. B/c most people would…& i know that for a fact. I work for perinintologists

  30. lastwordlinda says:

    What a couple of sanctimonious, self-righteous twits. I’m sure they both feel very special and better than anyone who has had to make “choices” these two don’t agree with. They may not come right out and say it, but you can tell it’s the way they feel. How dare they sit it judgement of anyone, as if they have led exemplary lives. Bristol is young, maybe she will acquire her own brain one day, if she ever gets out of the clutches of her mother. Sarah Palin should just shut up. There is no way there isn’t something in her past that makes her speak out so vociferously against certain things. To paraphrase a famous line “I think the lady doth protest too much.” Kind of reminds me of Jimmy Swaggart and ilk.

  31. heb says:

    Look Sarah, if you cant get your story in People, DONT BOTHER

  32. Lem says:

    … the kid turned one….
    it is very odd to say “I like my one year old, I’m glad I didn’t have an abortion”

    Once past however many weeks conception, the abortion issue is over.

    anti-abortion + Pro Choice!
    Pro choice doesn’t mean you have to get an abortion
    anti-abortion doesn’t(have to)mean you can’t get one
    I will never understand how a woman can fathom dictating to another woman what to do with her own choice

    is a tabloid the place to make your bid?

  33. J says:

    Up to today, I am still amazed by the fact that this woman could manage to own some ‘market share’ among the American audience……

  34. Lem says:

    dude; what a ridiculous, untrue thing to say

  35. Sudini says:

    Congratulations on being in a situation where choosing not to have an abortion was viable. Assholes.

  36. princess pea says:

    dude – Wrong. There are a lot of celebs with special needs children, but you probably didn’t realize because they don’t trot them out for People magazine to make a political statement through an innocent child. (Well, except for Jenny McCarthy, I guess)

    I wouldn’t care if they wanted to do a speical issue on the Palin babies (although I feel bad for the kids in that family who get NO attention while Bristol, Tripp and Trig are household names… I bet there’s some jealousy). I just hate that they dare to use the word CHOICE. CHOICE is something that Palin would deny other young women.

  37. javelin says:

    I’m glad I choose quality of life, via birth control.

  38. Praise St. Angie! says:

    dude, you missed Peach’s point entirely.

    and it’s “perinatologist”. If you work for them, I’d think you could spell it.

  39. Volō Dīcere says:

    Peach, you must send your post to the editors at Intouch for it is brilliant and something I’d rather read about than a couple of white chicks on easy street.

  40. lucy2 says:

    @dude – I believe Katherine Heigl and her husband just adopted a special needs baby. I’m sure others have had or adopted special needs children as well, but just don’t choose to do the cover of InTouch Weekly.
    Everyone has already pretty much said everything I was going to, so…OK!

    Both babies are darling. I imagine they will have a very special friendship.

  41. Sunnyjyl says:

    Those are cute babies they CHOSE to have.

  42. cprincess says:

    Hand me a barf bag someone quickly pse.
    They both made a choice(well we think Bristol made a choice but maybe her mommy made it for her)to continue their pregnancies but its not theirs,the Christian Right or anybodies elses business what I or other women do with their bodies…..
    I think it about sums these hillbillys up,being on the cover of a tabloid willingly…

  43. Iggles says:

    It really strikes me that Bristol Palin has barely sought the spotlight since her mother’s campaign. While her famewh*re ex boyfriend has been posing in Playgirl and trash-talking her mom to any outlet that will have him, Bristol has held her tongue and raised her son in virtual silence. It’s nice to see a relatively neutral, positive interview in which she focuses on her life as a mom. Bristol has really come out on top in this whole drama-filled debacle.

    I gotta disagree with you here CB.

    The one time Bristol tried to speak her mind after the birth, Sarah quickly silenced her. I’m referring to the time Bristol said abstinence programs didn’t work during an interview. Sarah, who was off to the side, swooped in and Bristol never mentioned it again. In fact, she reversed her position and started to promote abstinence only programs (im sure at the urging of her mother).

    I suspect the reason we haven’t heard much from Bristol is because Palin won’t allow it. As she raises her son, Bristol is dependent on them for money and a roof over her head. Until she has her own resources she cannot go off the reservation.

    Also I think the reason Levi is speaking out again Palin is because she’s playing dirty in Alaska. Even as a former Governor she has quite a pull there and is likely making things difficult for Levi and his family. And it wouldn’t surprise me if Palin and co are interfering with Levi’s access to his son.

    In my opinion, the Palins are shady and have a tight lease on Bristol and are furious Levi is standing up to them.

  44. padiddle says:

    @dude – How would you know whether celebrities have special needs children or not? Do you live with them? Work for them? Hang out with them?
    No, you don’t, and so it’s rude of you to generalize that all celebrities (or even a lot) would not keep special needs children.
    For instance, John Travolta and Kelly Preston’s son, who passed away, was autistic and had many medical issues. But, you didn’t hear anything about him until he passed away, because guess what’ THEY DIDN’T WANT TO USE HIM FOR PUBLICITY.
    I think you completely missed Peach’s point – Why do we laud these celebs for being able to (gasp!) raise their children in homes and neighborhoods with plenty of money and access to good schools etc?
    We should be praising women and men able to raise well adjusted children even in the worst of situations – bad neighborhood, no job, single parent.

  45. Bodhi says:

    @ dude – Colin Farrel’s son James is a special needs child, as was John Travolta’s late son Jett. Doug Flutie, Toni Braxton & Sylvester Stallone all have kinds with autism. John, Bobby & Ted Kennedy had a sister with special needs & their mother helped found the Special Olympics.

    Your statement is so stupid I have idea why I bothered to acknowledge it

  46. ,,,, says:

    @ praise st. angie – Thank you for enlightening dude on how to spell perinatologist as well as the irony involved in spelling your employer’s profession wrong.

    And @ dude – I am frightened by the prospect that Trig has “innocents” in his eyes. How did they get there and can they leave?

  47. annie says:

    #46, if I’m not mistaken, the things these little ones suffer from that you listed would not be detected before birth, they were discovered after the fact. Sarah knew full well Trig had downs way before she gave birth. Also. it was #11 not #13 who I thought made a viscious remark, sorry Anon.

  48. Michelle says:

    Two things have always bothered me about this Sarah Palin thing and her “choosing” to keep her child.
    1. She got pregnant at an age where risk for Downs Syndrome (and other developmental issues) is much higher – perhaps if she had thought about that before getting pregnant she would not have had to make that “choice”
    2. The way she talks about it you’d swear Downs Syndrome is a horrible, life-threatening illness or condition where she made the “brave” decision to allow this child into the world. Most parents I know with Downs Syndrome children find them to be wonderful, loving and rewarding kids. We’re also so much more equipped t deal with kids with this Syndrome. So quit the martyr-ing there Palin.

    3. Like she considered abortion for one secnd – she said that so she could SAY she made the CHOICE.
    4. What if her child DID have a really terrible life-threatening condition (e.g. Tay Sachs,which I know hers couldn’t have) – does she think women should make the choice to bring a child into the world where they are going to suffer for the few months they are alive just so the parents can have a clean conscious?

  49. Praise St. Angie! says:

    “How did they get there and can they leave?”

    oh dear, that made me laugh!

  50. J-Lin says:

    Go ahead Peach! Couldn’t have said it better.

  51. nj says:

    Testify, Peach! Testify!

    I really don’t buy that Bristol has to support the baby. I honestly think they have painted the best picture they could to trot out. Don’t tell me that Sarah and Bristol go to Costco together and pick up cases of diapers and split the cost. The hired help is out buying that stuff and paying out of household accounts. If my daughter (who is a baby) had a child at 18 and wanted to raise it and I had Sarah Palin’s money, I would pick up the cost too, as long as my daughter wasn’t running around like an idiot. That’s my grandchild. I’m not nickel-and-diming my grandchild.
    Bristol doesn’t seem too bad. I’m sure she loves the baby, but wishes she didn’t have him so young. She’ll be happy one day that she made this decision because she’ll get married and be older and shell always have money and opportunity. She won’t be a teen mom anymore and it’ll be fine.

    The cover is rather smug, and I can see why people don’t like Sarah Palin. I would not have put that headline on it. Its polarizing.

  52. boo says:

    What cute babies and how fortunate Sarah and Bristol had a choice in their reproductive health.

  53. Liz says:

    Hmm… This was a good article. However, I don’t think this is “Anti-Abortion” at all, in fact the title didn’t do anything for me. Everyone seems to forget that choosing life is still a choice. Just because you don’t get an abortion doesn’t mean that you are “Anti-Abortion”.. it just means that you personally didn’t want the abortion…. maybe you’ll have one another time.

  54. princess pea says:

    One little request, CB. It’s my belief that use of the term “pro-life” in these discussions is really negative, aiming to make a certain group look evil. Who isn’t PRO-LIFE, literally? Even people who preform abortions are pro-life, or they would probably commit suicide. People who identify as pro-life are in fact anti-choice. Similarly, no one is really pro-abortion, most people would prefer that no one ever had to make that choice (i.e. no unplanned pregnancy ever, no unhealthy babies ever). The women who have abortions aren’t high-fiving and cheering their way through the process; they didn’t set out to get pregnant just to get a trendy abortion. It’s usually a really difficult situation to be in.

    I know you know that, but it’s important to me that we be careful what words we use. Language matters, and words give power to ideas.

  55. Praise St. Angie! says:

    “Everyone seems to forget that choosing life is still a choice.”

    exactly the opposite. Most people who have commented have pointed out that she made a CHOICE, which she wants TO TAKE AWAY from other women. that’s kind of the point.

    she made a choice but she doesn’t want women to even have the opportunity to make a choice. hence the hypocrisy of her wording, which is what people are pointing out.

    not to mention, her choice was based on the resources that a LOT of women don’t have.

    EDIT: Princess Pea, well said. I hate how people refer to pro-choicers as “pro-abortion”. I don’t know of a single pro-choice person who wants more abortions, just the right for women to make a choice that bests suits their situation, their health, etc. strange as it may sound, you can be both pro-life and pro-choice.

  56. Anastasia says:

    PEACH FOR THE WIN. Thank you! Exactly.

  57. guest says:

    @peach…uh huh & then some.

  58. Mel says:

    Princess Pea – I couldn’t agree more about the choice of words. The other side to pro-life is anti-life or pro-abortion. I am pro-choice, but that does not make me pro-abortion, but rather pro QUALITY OF LIFE of everyone involved. I have given this speech to everyone I hear utter the words “pro-life” for at least the past decade. Nice to see that someone else is too!

  59. TG says:

    Iggles I agree with you about Bristol being dependant on her parents so she really isn’t able to choose on her own and I also am on Levi’s side. I don’t trust the Palin’s. And regarding celebs having special needs children, it depends on what line you draw. I wouldn’t abort a child with certain physical symptoms but I am for sure not keeping a mental vegetable. Of course I realize after giving birth to a healthy child that child could get sick or have an accident that results in severe mental impairment. I guess you have to deal with it then. But as for Heigel her daughter reportedly had surgery for a heart ailment not sure what it is so that isn’t anything like bringing home a mentally challenged person. As for the Kennedy’s didn’t they have a lobotomy performed on the sister that resulted in disaster and wasn’t she shipped off to some home to be cared for?

    Anyway, I enjoy everyone’s comments. The people who comment on this site to me are the most reasonable bloggers with a great sense of humor so thanks everyone!

  60. The best says:

    name one celebrity that has a child with downs. Name one!! You cant! The paps take a pic of every celeb that walks out their door. Im sure they would catch a post prego star out w/ their baby!! Or who knows maybe they do & dont let them leave the house!! My mistake….everyone else is right! Silly me!

  61. Praise St. Angie! says:

    as it’s been stated, John McGinley has a child with Down Syndrome.

    Colin Farrell’s son has Angelman Syndrome which is very similar to Down in the developmental disabilities realm.

    Albert Pujols (star of MLB) has a daughter with Down Syndrome.

    I’m sure there are more. but it’s not the kind of thing you put on the cover of a magazine. unless you’re Sarah Palin, of course.

  62. Lem says:

    @the best
    why so angry?

    @ the rest
    it’s the wording that confuses the issue.
    IE: yes for no gay marriage or no for yes gay marriage
    the wording hurts the movement

  63. Ally says:

    Praise St. Angie @ #54: Thanks for stating the importance of these labels. They define the issue. Everyone is pro-life. What we’re talking about here is pro-choice and anti-choice.

    Am impressed by the enlightened comments on this topic here today!

  64. daisyfly says:

    Sarah Palin exploits her children and then wants us to applaud her for bringing yet another child into the world to exploit for her own gain?

    Call me cynical but a huge part of me believes wholeheartedly that the only reason she decided to continue her pregnancy with Trig was because she knew she could use it as leverage of some kind. Even before she was nominated for VP she used Trig’s birth and Down Syndrome to HER benefit.

    Also, with regards to DS, the proper term is Trisomy 21. There are varying types of Trisomy, with T21 being the mildest form and the most common. Had Trig been diagnosed with Trisomy 18 in utero, he would have most likely died while she was still pregnant.

    Contrary to popular belief, most Trisomy 21 diagnoses do NOT get aborted. The other forms, however, do, and I think she’s trying to relate T21 to Trisomy 18 and lower, which is really, really despicable.

    As for Bristol…girl’s trying to talk about being hungry while she’s got a slice of cake in her mouth. I DGAF about that sponge.

  65. MT says:

    I usually don’t post, but I do know of an actor that has a down syndrome child. John C McGinley who plays Dr Cox on Scrubs, his son Max has Downs.

  66. Cinderella says:

    When does Sarah have time to raise Trigg? Seriously.

    It wouldn’t surprise me if Bristol were the full-time caregiver for both. Now Sarah can pay her well with Fox bucks.

  67. annie says:

    #64 Ya that is cynical, almost nuts. You remind me of my crazy sister.

  68. Oy Vey says:

    I’d choose life too if I were being paid $600,000 to be in a cheesy magazine. Palin was also quoted refering the “little retard”

  69. crash2GO2 says:

    I firmly believe that abortion is murder. And I also firmly believe that it is wrong to make it illegal. And Sarah Palin is a laughable idiot if she can’t see the fallacy of her logic when she talks about being glad she made the right ‘choice’. Thank you to those here who have pointed it out.

  70. glowkey says:

    @crash2GO2: “I firmly believe that abortion is murder. And I also firmly believe that it is wrong to make it illegal.” How in the world does that make any sense? Equating abortion to murder means a woman who just walked out of an abortion clinic is no different than an armed gunman who walks up to someone and pulls the trigger, right? So then how can one act be illegal yet you don’t favor illegalizing the other?

  71. nj says:

    This nation should try an experiment. For a set period of time, make medicinal birth control dirt cheap and available over the counter to anyone over 16 who can pass a blood pressure test. I would be interested to see the results and what kind of money could be saved by health insurance and welfare, as well as abortion rates.

  72. ~A says:

    Sarah Palin is a tool.

  73. singerinwhite says:

    #71: I like your idea. I think maybe it should be done in a single state first – as an experiment. A state that has a high teen pregnancy rate and or abortion rate.

    My lord – when I saw that cover, I felt so much blinding rage. What a pretentious cover, and what pretentious language.

  74. Trillion says:

    Damn liberal media.

  75. Trillion says:

    Glowkey: Thank you. This is not pointed out enough and it drives me nuts with it’s inconsistency and leap of logic.

  76. ViktoryGin says:

    @nj

    Second. Here in Korea, the pill is over the counter and costs per month the price of McDonald’s combo meal. The teen pregnancy rate is nearly zilch. There are other factors of course, but hmmmm….. Coincidence?

  77. annie says:

    Fallacy of logic????? Also,#71, there would still be a problem. With the sex ed. and birth conreol available, birth rates among teens are still high. So the answer is something else( I wonder what that could be?)I’m an OB nurse and we frequently see people who are 4/4 at age 21 for example, meaning, 4 pregnancies and 4 births, don’t you think their Doc’s give them a script for birth control at the first post partum visit, yet they continue this way Why? You can’t say to a teenage mind, go have sex and don’t forget you’re birth control. Look around , has it worked?

  78. Green Is Good says:

    “We’re glad we chose life”. Could they be more sanctimonious and morally superior? They’re not fooling anybody with this self-righteous, saintly act. Sarah is schilling for her new job at Fox, and she’s using her daughter, son and grandchild for publicity. Pathetic.

    Also, well stated Peach and Praise St. Angie.

  79. boo says:

    Somebody posted a fun fact that Bristol was opening a PR agency. Verrrry interesting. Let me guess. She’s Sarah’s publicist. I wonder what her salary is?

  80. Ally says:

    Bristol Palin set up her corporation or whatever cause it’s the best way to handle money coming in from her various speaking engagements. It may lead to PR work in the future (she certainly seems classier and smarter than her mother), but I gather that’s not the main purpose at present: it just allows for a better way to handle money from the way she works now.

    Levi Johnston has said in interviews that the older kids in the house are the child care providers, cleaners and cooks. I guess that’s the point of having so many? Though people like to impugn Levi’s motives, I think this story is rather proved by how often and how expertly the very young daughter handled the Palin babies at the various rallies during the campaign. It’s not often that one sees 10 year olds being allowed to heft around newborns.

  81. VLF says:

    How nice. Tweedledumb and Tweedledumber made the cover of ANOTHER magazine.

    Boy, for someone who gets all pissy that the ‘media is in her family’s face’ all the time, The Wasilly Hillbilly certainly whores herself and them out for the media … ALOT.

    Oh, the SCREAMING hypocrisy of Alaska’s Quitter In Chief!

  82. Trillion says:

    #77, I think kids still feel “slutty” for carrying birth control – at least many girls do. It’s like you’re expecting to have sex, and preparing for sex is slutty, but having spontaneous sex somehow is not. That approach is not smart, but having grown up in a very strict religious environment, I can tell you that is the prevailing sentiment. Sex ought to be demystified and deconstructed in sex ed.

  83. annie says:

    Trillion, the guys would be the ones to have it on them, the gals take it in the privacy of their on home, the girls don’t have to tell anyone if they choose not to. I don’t know how much more we can demystify or deconstruct sex more than we do. It’s everywhere and that might be alot of the problem.We’ve made it into a sport, we reap what we sow I guess.

  84. justathought says:

    @annie: do you think a 4/4 has the kind of disposable income around to keep up with buying birth control pills and take care of her kids? I know I don’t. They make that stuff almost impossible to buy. Yes, I know there’s condoms but I just don’t like hearing how these women are bad for not filling their script.

    As to the language debate: everyone seems to forget that being anti something has a negative connotation. Most people want to be pro, hence pro-life and pro-choice. Just like pro-life makes it seem like the other side hates all life, anti-choice makes them sound like they hate all choices.

  85. BTR says:

    The article’s title should really be “We’re glad we chose life (and now Sarah will work her hardest to ensure no one has the right to chose because women can’t be left alone to make their own decisions, the government should do it for them).”

    And let’s just all remember this article and this interview next time Palin goes on a rant about the media not leaving her family alone.

  86. abigail7881 says:

    #77 (annie) probably some of the reason a 21 year old would be 4/4 could be if she’s on medicaid, the more kids she has, the more money/food stamps she would receive per month. I worked at an urgent care and saw it a lot, they also would have the latest fashion, but no job. It made me mad.

  87. singerinwhite says:

    #77 – I agree with # 82. And the biggest part is that girls don’t really know about the pill.

    That NEEDS to change.

    I’m 21 – Fortunately, I’m not pregnant. But my high school sex ed consisted of “DON’T HAVE SEX.”

    “But if you do? USE A CONDOM.”

    It’s certainly a good start, but there’s still the fact that boys and girls alike feel embarrassed to go in stores to get condoms. And they feel embarrassed to grab them when the teacher dumps them out on a table to get them for free. Trust me – I was one of those people, and my health teacher was encouraging girls to grab them as well.

    There needs to be multiple options out there – and the different forms of the pill MUST be more affordable. Because they’re not. They really aren’t.

    #77, I also think that another reason why girls might not use the pill if they can get it (especially if these are teenage girls) is the parental factor. They might not have a way to get around the parent – and no way for the parent not to find out that they’re on the pill. Because if they’re on the pill – then they’re “doing the deed” which will get them into massive problems with the parents.

    But that gets into a whole different issue – the close minded attitude of many adults.

  88. Wresa says:

    Princess Pea–That is why typically newspapers refer to pro-lifers as “anti-abortion.” The term “pro-life” is too charged and what is the opposite? “Anti-life?” “Pro-death?”

  89. oh hey says:

    “#13 that’s a pretty viscious statement.”

    Stating the obvious is vicious? Wow.

    ETA: ITA with Peach.

    @dude. John Travolta’s and Jenny McCarthy’s kids were/are autisic. Do some research before posting, moron.

  90. oh hey says:

    dude; the best=Todd Palin.

    Also, it’s sad that babies can’t have a choice sometimes. If that’s true, Sarah would be a childless spinster right now.

  91. annie says:

    Oh hey, refer to post #37, the numbers were changed after I posted.

  92. oh hey says:

    @annie. I read #37 and I take back my original post to you. That said, I agree with Javelin on this one, for reasons many people have stated, such as poverty, adequate child care at the very least, having to use government assistance to provide basic child need, and sometimes what the mother gets isn’t enough. Not to mention, there are women out there who have kids they don’t want and treat them like garbage. It really upsets me when I see a woman screaming and cursing at little toddlers. There’s not the same as sternly talking to them and occasionally raising your voice. This is just plain nasty.

  93. annie says:

    This whole spiral downward of people becoming dependant on the government began with Johnson’s “great society” and “war on poverty”, this opened the flood gates of so many kids being born out of wedlock-the government became the surrogate father, and stopping that has been like holding back a tsunami ever since. The government has to stop rewarding bad behavior. Stop doing what they can and should do for themselves. Of course there has to be a safety net for the legitament poor, but let me add,the private sector does a much more efficient job at this than the nanny state(charities etc.)Anyway, I could go on and on, but believe me government is the problem, it does’nt solve problems and it certainly does’nt produce anything. Let me add to what #86 said, it’s very true except sh left out they always have the latest cell phones as well. Anyway, I hace to go take out my chicken now.

  94. bella says:

    Why can’t I be pro-life, pro-choice, and pro-woman? That’s what I am. And to the government: Keep your laws off my body!

  95. kat says:

    jeez sarah get a life!

  96. fence,invisible fence says:

    Great paintings! That is the kind of info that are meant to be shared across the internet. Disgrace on the search engines for no longer positioning this submit higher! Come on over and discuss with my website . Thank you =)