Stylish Celebrity Escapism
Contributing Writers
Feb 21
'08
Tom and Kate treat Suri like a little adult

suristrange.jpg
Even though Suri Cruise is barely two years old, her parents, Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes, treat her like she is an adult. That’s because according to Scientology, Suri isn’t really a baby - she has lived for millions of years. (If you could see me right now, you’d see that I am making that circular motion with my finger next to my head. You know, the universal signal for “batshit crazy.”)

She’s not yet 2-years-old, but Suri Cruise’s face is known the world over. Whether she is out shopping at high end New York stores, sightseeing in Paris or watching the Spice Girls in LA, her parents Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes treat her like a little adult.

That is because that is how they see her. As Scientologists, they believe their daughter has lived for billions of years and so she already knows all there is to know. Just like a grown-up she doesn’t even go to bed until 11 p.m!

For Suri there is hardly any discipline, a fascinating Star probe into her life reveals. But there are rules. Tom forbids television and because of anti-Scientology sites, when she is old enough, her computer use will be very limited. “The Internet has become a major source of problems for Scientology,” cult expert Rick Ross tells Star. When it comes to education, Suri will follow Tom’s other kids, Isabella and Connor and be schooled in the controversial church.

McDonalds is out, her diet is organic, with boiled barley juice one of its major ingredients. Her health is maintained not with medicine, but by herbs. Her friends are virtually all the children of fellow Scientology believers.

[From Star Magazine]

No McDonald’s or TV probably isn’t a bad idea. And we’ve heard about the barley juice before. There was a story that instead of breastfeeding Suri as an infant, Tom insisted that Suri be fed on barley water. At that time, I thought there was no way a child could be nourished on that stuff, but Suri looks very healthy, so maybe there’s something to that barley juice after all.

That part about no discipline is bothersome, though. I don’t know how you let a two-year-old run rampant in your house without at least the occasional “no” or “don’t touch.” Anyone who’s raised a toddler knows what I’m talking about here. If you don’t set rules and boundaries, you can pretty much count on having yourself a selfish brat.

I wonder - were Isabella and Conor raised the same way? Somehow I can’t see Nicole Kidman agreeing to the “no discipline” part. Which could partially explain why they are no longer together and her kids never see her. I’m sure given the choice, my kids would rather live with their good-time, no-rules daddy too.

Thanks to popbytes for the header image.

Written by MSat

Posted in Babies, Katie Holmes, Tom Cruise

On-Page Comments are closed.

Add a comment in pop-up window
(for posts before 4/21/08)
On April 21, 2008, comments were moved from the pop-up Haloscan format onto the page. Older posts still use the Haloscan comments for discussions, and you are welcome to comment there. All new posts use on-page commenting.

Recent Comments:
  • CC: BETH LOOKS LIKE A HO, AND IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT, IT IS WHAT IT IS
  • Diva: Are balls really the “pleasing” part of the area??? lol I always looked at them as function over...
  • just me: He’s butt ugly and so is she. They were made for each others :] I love his music but can’t stand...
  • SeVen: TBH guys with one ball arent as “pleasing” to the eye but sexually they arent lacking.
  • hentai video love mom: shocking video hentai mom hentai video mom gallery
  • whatevs: Am I the only one that thinks they should leave Ghostbusters alone? It’s not like a third movie is in...
  • renee: OMG! I sure would love to get a hold of David before he’s cured! :) :) Best wishes to you David!
  • Jessie: There is no state in the US that allows birthparents three years to change their mind and take a child back....
 
 

Celebitchy is a celebrity gossip site written by several independent authors. The opinions of the authors are their own and do not necessarily represent the opinions of the site owner. All information on this site is for entertainment purposes only. Articles are based on rumor, conjecture, and published information in other sources. The site makes no claims that content is valid, accurate, or true. The site owner and the authors contributing to it will not be held liable for damages resulting from errors, omissions or falsehoods published on this site. It is not the site owner or the contributing authors' intention to defame or malign any particular group, religion, ethnic group, club, organization, company, or individual. The site owner is not responsible for content on linked or quoted sources. All comments made by visitors to the blog are the responsibility of their respective authors and are only sporadically monitored. The site owner will not be held liable for comments in any way.