More than a decade ago, Matt Damon did the Playboy Interview and he dropped some interesting gossip about many different things. He ended up talking about all of the films he’d turned down which he later regretted not doing. He was offered Josh Brolin’s role in Milk, he could have potentially done Brokeback Mountain with Joaquin Phoenix, and he swore up and down that James Cameron offered him the lead in Avatar. Damon told Playboy: “Having to say no to Avatar was tough because I particularly wanted to work with James Cameron, and still do, because he’s fantastic. He knew he was the star of that movie and that everyone was going to go see it anyway.” In other interviews, Damon claimed that Cameron knew he didn’t need a big name for the role, but that Cameron still offered him 10% of the gross if he took the part. Meaning, if Damon had said yes, he would have gotten a nine-figure backend, potentially something over $250 million. The problem? James Cameron now says that he never offered Matt Damon anything like that.
James Cameron says Matt Damon‘s viral claim of rejecting the lead role in Avatar — and losing out on a massive payday — isn’t entirely accurate.
The backstory: For the past two years, a video of Damon has made the rounds, explaining how The Martian star was offered the role of Jake Sully in the 2009 blockbuster in exchange for a whopping 10 percent of the film’s gross (the role went to Sam Worthington).
“Jim Cameron called me — he offered me 10 percent of Avatar,” Damon said [on camera]. “You will never meet an actor who turned down more money than me … I was in the middle of shooting the Bourne movie and I would have to leave the movie kind of early and leave them in the lurch a little bit and I didn’t want to do that … [Cameron] was really lovely, he said: ‘If you don’t do this, this movie doesn’t really need you. It doesn’t need a movie star at all. The movie is the star, the idea is the star, and it’s going to work. But if you do it, I’ll give you 10 percent of the movie.’”
Given that Avatar grossed $2.9 billion, the claim suggests Damon lost potentially hundreds of millions by rejecting the film and, by extension, its two subsequent sequels. But Cameron says — to quote Rose in Titanic — that the reality is “somewhat different.”
“He was never offered the part,” Cameron tells The Hollywood Reporter. “I can’t remember if I sent him the script or not. I don’t think I did? Then we wound up on a call and he said, ‘I love to explore doing a movie with you. I have a lot of respect for you as a filmmaker. [Avatar] sounds intriguing. But I really have to do this Jason Bourne movie. I’ve agreed to it, it’s a direct conflict, and so, regretfully, I have to turn it down.’ But he was never offered. There was never a deal. We never talked about the character. We never got to that level. It was simply an availability issue.”
Added Cameron: “Now what he’s done is he’s extrapolated ‘I get 10 percent of the gross on all my films.’ And if, in his mind, that’s what it would’ve taken for him to do Avatar, then it wouldn’t have happened. Trust me on that. So he’s off the hook and doesn’t have to beat himself up anymore,” Cameron playfully adds. “Matt, it’s okay, buddy! You didn’t miss anything.”
Cameron added that he respects Damon and thought it was classy of the actor to reach out and noted that turning down a movie due to a prior commitment is an “ethical” move. “He felt compelled to call me personally and tell me; he said he didn’t want it to come from the agent — that’s an honorable guy,” Cameron says. “So all respect to Matt. I’d love to work with him someday. But that never happened. It was a conflation of different things that were happening.”
Yeah, I actually believe Cameron’s version of events. It was probably widely known at the time that Cameron was casting a male lead for an effects-heavy project, so a lot of actors between the ages of 25 to 40 were theoretically in contention. There were probably calls made about availability for various actors, Matt included. Asking about availability isn’t a firm offer though. And Cameron is right that IF Matt had done Avatar, there was no way that Damon’s backend would have been structured like that. At least Matt Damon will no longer be the guy who turned down a $250 million paycheck. That paycheck never existed, and he wasn’t even offered the role.
Photos courtesy of Avalon Red.
- New York, USA. 9/23/24, New York, New York, United States Matt Damon during the Clinton Global Initiative CGI Day 1, held at the New York Hilton, Monday September 23, 2024 in New York City,Image: 911125873, License: Rights-managed, Restrictions: , Model Release: no, Credit line: Jennifer Graylock-Graylock.com/Avalon
- New York, USA. 9/23/24, New York, New York, United States Matt Damon during the Clinton Global Initiative CGI Day 1, held at the New York Hilton, Monday September 23, 2024 in New York City,Image: 911128187, License: Rights-managed, Restrictions: , Model Release: no, Credit line: Jennifer Graylock-Graylock.com/Avalon
- Netflix Tudum 2025 at the Kia Forum on May 31, 2025 in Los Angeles, CA,Image: 1006057581, License: Rights-managed, Restrictions: , Model Release: no, Pictured: Matt Damon, Credit line: Nicky Nelson/Wenn/Avalon
- James Cameron attends the “Avatar: Fire And Ash” European Premiere on December 05, 2025 in Boulogne-Billancourt, France.,Image: 1056954565, License: Rights-managed, Restrictions: , Model Release: no, Credit line: Thomas Floyd/Avalon
- James Cameron attends the “Avatar: Fire And Ash” European Premiere on December 05, 2025 in Boulogne-Billancourt, France.,Image: 1056954638, License: Rights-managed, Restrictions: , Model Release: no, Credit line: Thomas Floyd/Avalon

















Well damn imagine if he has been regretting it for the last 16 years,well now those thoughts have been set free.😂
IMO I think Matt made the right choice in not pursuing Avatar. He’s amazing in the Bourne series. I’ve lost count of how many times my husband and I have watched the Bourne movies whereas I have no desire to see Avatar again. Can’t wait to see Matt in The Odyssey.
things that didn’t need to be said for $500 — this is just weird to me — a lot of detail to make Damon look…bad? desperate?
Apparently the latest installment didn’t wow this weekend.
Well one of the things that has always bothered me about Matt – and I’ve been a fan of both Matt and Ben since GWH – is when he talks about how he was offered such and such movie before the actor that got the movie did. I mean who cares you’re just bragging. And Ben did say once Matt always exaggerates when he tells a story. This kinda proves it.
I love all 3 Avatar movies. I can’t see Matt Damon as Jake Sully. The roles went to the right people. Matt is right about one thing James might’ve said: the Avatar movies themselves are the stars along with James Cameron. They are beautifully filmed, and Zoe Saldana is awesome in them.
Seeing how actors like Matt Damon network is the most interesting part of this story. I learned something about how they communicate…. And also how things might get misunderstood. Yikes.
Did Matt Damon offer himself the part? That’s what it sounded like. I can also see a director turning him down based on money. So I guess I believe Cameron. Maybe there was discussion about one movie but he misinterpreted the percentage based on all the movies? Wouldn’t this go through agents and lawyers? I’m so confused haha.
So Matt publicized and “regretted” an event that never happened? I believe Cameron, too. I’ve heard Matt’s wife has stood by for years while Matt had affairs with other women. I believe that, too.
I don’t believe it. I know someone who worked for him and says he’s a super nice guy. On the other hand, did you hear the joke Amy Poehler told about James Cameron at the Golden Globes?
Damon might be a nice guy, but that amount of money cited is enough for me to believe that something, at minimum, was misunderstood by Damon at the very least. I don’t get why a director would need to promise him that percentage on 3 films. For that type of franchise, no actor is that indispensable.
I’m also wondering if a woman could get away with saying she turned down $250 million, even if the story is true.
I do think Damon made the right call in playing Jason Bourne, even if he believed he had the part in Avatar.
@Thinking – Yes, it does seem to be a misunderstanding between them but actors and actresses have made 10% and more of the profits of movies.
The “dispute” seems to be over the entire gross of the franchise though. Whenever I’ve read about a backend profit it’s usually after the first film is made or when no one actually knows how successful the film will be (the movies Keanu stars in or whatever Eva Longoria has bankrolled because no one was going to cough up the money). This film was going to be successful no matter who was in it – they didn’t need to pay Damon that much.
I read that Sam Worthington made 10 million plus 5 percent gross off the second movie, but not the entire franchise. He seems to have made about 60 million overall. So idk Damon has made misunderstood how much money he actually would have made.
I know Matt donates a lot of money to the charity he founded. He’s probably thinking of how much more money he could have donated.