
*Sharon Stone and the former nanny, Erlinda T. Elemen, who is now suing her, back in 2010.
Yesterday, the Los Angeles Times reported that Sharon Stone was being sued by a former nanny. And all hell broke loose! The former live-in nanny, a Filipino woman named Erlinda T. Elemen claims that she was fired by Sharon Stone for “accepting overtime pay and repeatedly subjected to derogatory comments about her Filipino heritage and religious beliefs.” Other claims: Sharon told Elemen not to speak in front the children because Sharon didn’t want them to “talk like you.” Elemen alleged that Stone used to tell her that Filipino people were “stupid”. Sharon alleged mocked and criticized Elemen’s religious beliefs, church attendance and Bible-reading – in fact, Stone allegedly forbade Elemen from reading the Bible, which is pretty rough considering the nanny lived with Stone. Here’s more:
A key element of the suit involves accusations that Stone, best known for her roles in “Casino” and “Basic Instinct,” fired Elemen after she had been paying her overtime, said the plaintiff’s attorney, Solomon Gresen.
“Because abuses in overtime pay are common for household employees, it seems ironic that Ms. Stone initially did the right thing and paid Mrs. Elemen overtime wages, and then terminated her for accepting those same wages,” Gresen said in a statement.
According to the suit, Elemen was hired by Stone in October 2006, working as an assistant nanny caring for one of three children of the 54-year-old actress. Two years later, Eleman was promoted to head nanny and began caring for all three children, which included extensive travel and living at Stone’s home.
Elemen was fired in February 2011 when Stone learned that she was paid overtime, the suit alleges. State law requires that non-salaried employees must be paid for additional work over eight hours per day or 40 hours per week. But the suit alleges Stone found out that her staff had paid her overtime and accused Elemen of “stealing” and that it was “illegal” for her to have taken the pay, and asked for the money back.
[From LA Times]
There’s even more stuff too, if you can believe that. Elemen says that after Sharon fired her, Sharon invited her “to come back in the future to say goodbye to the children she once cared for.” When fired from her position, Stone alleged wrote Elemen an email saying: “This email will terminate your employment without cause, as of today, Friday 8, 2011. Thank you for your services. I invite you to come by and say goodbye to Laird and Quinn. Best Regards, Sharon Stone — See me for a letter of reference. SS.” Sources say Stone did pay Elemen well – around $1000 a week, but since being fired, Elemen cannot find full-time work. Elemen also filed a complaint against Sharon with the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing back in February of this year, where Elemen detailed the harassment, etc.
Sharon’s spokesman, Paul Bloch, tells the LAT that the lawsuit is “frivolous” and Sharon will be “completely vindicated in court.” His full statement: “This is an absurd lawsuit that has been filed by a disgruntled ex-employee who is obviously looking to get money any way she can. After she was terminated approximately 1½ years ago, she filed claims for alleged disability and worker’s compensation. Now, she is obviously looking for another opportunity to cash in.”
So… do you believe Sharon’s side of the story (the former nanny is just looking for a payoff) or the nanny’s side of the story (Sharon is a monster)?


Photos courtesy of WENN, Fame/Flynet and Pacific Coast News.