Stylish Celebrity Escapism
Contributing Writers
Dec 14
'06
Nicole Richie has an earlier DUI and could be sent to jail for 5 days


Nicole Richie’s high-profile arrest for driving the wrong way on the freeway this week wasn’t the first time she was nabbed for driving under the influence. Richie pled guilty to DUI four years ago, and according to TMZ if she’s convicted of DUI again she’ll have to serve a mandatory five day jail sentence.

TMZ has found court documents which reveal that Richie pled no contest four years ago to driving under the influence. Under California law, if Richie is convicted of DUI as a result of Monday’s arrest, the judge must impose a jail sentence.

The law requires a mandatory sentence of five consecutive days in county jail as well as a one year license suspension for anyone twice-convicted of DUI. In addition, Richie would be ordered to attend an alcohol education program for a year-and-a-half, even if the second conviction is not alcohol-related.

As TMZ first reported, Richie admitted to CHP officers that she had taken Vicodin and smoked pot before driving the wrong way on a Burbank freeway. A field sobriety test revealed she was not under the influence of alcohol.

Although Richie was under the influence of non-alcoholic drugs, it might not matter in court. She was clearly impaired and should not have been driving. Maybe she can call up Michelle Rodriguez for some tips on how to get all her fellow inmates singing showtunes.

In Richie’s previous DUI offense in 2002 she blew a .12. and a .13, and the limit for impairment is .08. At that time she told officers that she had a shot of vodka. Her license was suspended for a year and she had three years probation. She got arrested again for driving with a suspended license and possession of heroin just six months after that.

During her latest DUI arrest, Richie said that she had only eaten french fries that day.

Written by Celebitchy

Posted in Arrests, Drunk, Nicole Richie, Photos

2 Responses to “Nicole Richie has an earlier DUI and could be sent to jail for 5 days”

  1. This could suck big time for her. With five days is a minimum required sentence. Depending on the judge she could get up to a year.

    A guy I worked with several years back was in a similar situation. He thought he’d get the five days and be back out in no time. Evidently he said the wrong things and got six months.

    As much as she’s been in the news for partying she may be in pretty deep.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  2. Actually the comment about her only having eating french fries that day was from when she was arrested in 2002, not this week.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

Recent Comments:
  • RAN: Little Deacon looks like Ryan Gosling from the Notebook — That IS the guy’s name, right? I...
  • April: I liked it. The red wig was hot, I have to say. Wouldn’t work for everyday life, but she did pull it off...
  • Boobz: cheyenne, I have NEVER been turned on by Brad pitt the faker. he is too phony for me and not good looking. I...
  • RAN: The song was ok… but I thought she looked fabulous in the video. Good for her!
  • RAN: Freakin’ hilarious SeVen! I’ve never heard it put quite that way but truer words have never been...
  • EnKay: I think she looks beautiful - but my GOD what a horrific song. I had to turn off the volume so I could make it...
  • Codzilla: Good God that little boy is adorable. 8O Too lazy to look up carb face. I’m guessing it’s...
  • Tia: Heard she loves the vjayjay ALOT !!! Go Pink.. :)
 
 

Celebitchy is a celebrity gossip site written by several independent authors. The opinions of the authors are their own and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Celebitchy, LLC. All information on this site is for entertainment purposes only. Articles are based on rumor, conjecture, and published information in other sources. Celebitchy, LLC makes no claims that content is valid, accurate, or true. Celebitchy, LLC and the authors contributing to it will not be held liable for damages resulting from errors, omissions or falsehoods published on this site. It is not the site or the contributing authors' intention to defame or malign any particular group, religion, ethnic group, club, organization, company, or individual. Celebitchy, LLC is not responsible for content on linked or quoted sources. All comments made by visitors to the blog are the responsibility of their respective authors and are only sporadically monitored. Celebitchy, LLC will not be held liable for comments in any way.