Prince Harry & Meghan Markle are ‘next level’ & ‘practically living together’

As we discussed last week, Meghan Markle did end up making a charity trip to India, and the press didn’t get wind of it until she was leaving India and about to return back to London. Meghan has been using London as her homebase since just before New Year’s – she flew to London after Christmas, she and Harry went on holiday together in Norway, and they’ve been at his London cottage (on the grounds of Kensington Palace) ever since, except for the India trip. Harry has also been stepping out and doing solo charity events, but we haven’t caught sight of Meghan in more than a week. Until now! Harry and Meghan had a date night on Wednesday and The Sun got the photos – go here to see. Apparently, Meghan has pretty much moved in with Harry.

Doting Prince Harry took girlfriend Meghan Markle by the hand this week as they walked down a busy London street after a dinner date. It is the first time the couple have been seen hand-in-hand in public — another sign that their blossoming romance is serious. And pals say actress Meghan has “virtually moved in” to Harry’s cottage at Kensington Palace with the couple “inseparable” for the past five weeks.

One friend said: “Meg is not filming in Toronto at the moment so she is free to spend all her time with Harry.”

On Wednesday night the couple went for dinner at Soho House — the private members’ club in West London where Suits star Meghan and Harry met through a mutual friend last year. An onlooker said: “They tried to keep as low-key as possible and were sitting in a small snug area of the restaurant. But it wasn’t a private area and they were happy to be seen. Gary Lineker and a whole host of the Made In Chelsea cast were also there, but they only had eyes for each other.”

Apart from a handful of engagements abroad American divorcee Meghan, 35, and Harry have been staying together since the end of 2016.

The friend added: “They’ve taken things to the next level. They’re practically living together. She cooks for him, he pops out to the gym and they’re just enjoying hanging out. Meg has always enjoyed spending time in London, but she’s really putting down roots.”

[From The Sun]

I imagine it would be fun to put down roots in a new city when you’re dating a prince and staying at his palace-adjacent cottage. I mean, if there’s a “right way” to move to a new city, that’s the way to do it. As for the obvious conversation about where this is heading… Meghan still has a job, as an actress on Suits. She’s due back in Canada for filming in a few months, I think. But it wouldn’t surprise me at all if they got engaged soon. That’s what the royal reporters believe too. This tweet is from Richard Eden, the Deputy Diary Editor at the Daily Mail:

So the royal press pack is expecting it. Harry doesn’t do well with “romantic expectations” in general, but I do think Meghan is different. I think he’s different now too. What do you think? Autumn bride? By that I mean… like, they’ll get married in October or November?

Prince Harry visits the headquarters of the London Ambulance Service

Prince Harry visits the headquarters of the London Ambulance Service

Photos courtesy of WENN.

Related stories

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

220 Responses to “Prince Harry & Meghan Markle are ‘next level’ & ‘practically living together’”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Margo S. says:

    Their children will be beautiful!!!!

  2. Lilac says:

    Woah he looks way taller than I expected!
    Anyway,. I agree… Wedding bells

  3. Digital Unicorn (aka Betti) says:

    It’s going to be an epic wedding Jus the thing to distract and cheer everyone up.

    • Amy says:

      IF there is a wedding it will not be public. She is a divorcee. No Westminster Abbey for her. A registry wedding like Prince Charles and Camilla.

      • AT says:

        It will be a public wedding. No worries.

      • Amy says:

        You don’t understand COE. Meghan is a divorcee. She will not marry Harry in public because of that. Prince Charles is the future King and he had to marry at a registry because he was divorced. No hope for Megs to stroll down WestminsterAbbey like Kate.

      • Fluff says:

        Not true, divorcees can marry in church here in England, at the discretion of the minister. The “she can only have a registry office wedding” is some line the bitter Harry Stans on Tumblr keep spouting, but it’s nonsense. I’ve been to lots of CoE weddings where one or both were divorced.

        I know how desperately you hate Meghan and want this story to be untrue, Amy; your many many posts on the subject have made that clear, but in this case your information is simply incorrect. Prince Charles chose to have a registry office wedding, perhaps because they are older or probably due to Diana’s popularity.

      • Spiderpig says:

        Divorceees can get married in CoE. The rules changed years ago.

      • Luca76 says:

        I’m pretty sure the knives were out for Camilla when they married which is why they didn’t have a big wedding. (Also being older was probably a big part of it too).

      • perplexed says:

        I remember Charles and Camilla’s wedding be on tv. I don’t know if that counts as public, but I’m pretty sure it was televised at least.

      • Sixer says:

        ST MARTIN IN THE FIELD.

        They can marry in church if they want to. There are plenty of CofE vicars and even bishops who are happy to do that.

        But perhaps they won’t want to.

        Either way, it will still be a public wedding.

      • Cerys says:

        Charles and Camilla had a registry office wedding followed by a blessing at St George’s Chapel, Windsor. The latter was attended by all the usual politicians, royals, celebs etc who turn up for these type of things. It was not on the scale of Whiny and Waity’s wedding though.

      • Mads says:

        There are two main guidelines regarding divorcees wanting to re-marry in church: 1) If the ex-spouse is still living and 2) the marriage cannot be seen to condone a relationship that is a result of adultery that lead to the couple divorcing their previous spouse. The living ex is not so much of a problem any more but Charles and Camilla could not overcome the second reason. If Harry and Meghan do get married, there should not be any issue about them getting married in a church.

      • bluhare says:

        We can hold out hope for our Christmas wedding, Sixer!

      • Sixer says:

        bluhare, it’s going to be FABULOUS. There will be golden coaches, choristers in St Martin, choux pastry swans and FLYING ELVI.

      • Maria says:

        Agree with you Sixer. Westminster Abbey is nice, but nothing like St Martins at Christmas. So pretty. And very very romantic.
        Amy. The COE has relaxed its rules quite a bit, so yes at the discretion of the minister, divorced people can marry there. Anyway, at the present time, the Queen is the head of the Church so she can call the shots.

      • Kori says:

        Charles wasn’t a divorcee when he remarried. Diana had died so technically, for the church, he was widowed. Camilla was the divorcee.

      • notasugarhere says:

        I’d hope private-but-televised, either at SMITF or Windsor. Anything to keep Emperor Baby Fists from being in the front row gloating like a toad after getting an invite. Private event they can get out of inviting him, official event it would be difficult to get out of it.

        Timing? Avoiding the anniversary of Diana’s death and HM&PP’s 70th anniversary November 20th would be good.

      • Tina says:

        Don’t worry, Harry is 5th in line to the throne, Trump won’t be there. At Andrew & Sarah’s wedding, Nancy Reagan came but there was no expectation that the president would attend.

      • Moneypenny says:

        @kori, Charles and Diana were officially divorced by the time she died.

      • PennyLane says:

        What if she was not married in the Church of England, does it still count then?

        I know that the rules can change because I was raised Catholic but married in a Jewish ceremony. Even though the marriage ended in divorce, I am still eligible to get married in a Catholic Church because my initial marriage was not a Catholic one and therefore did not “count”.

      • Tina says:

        The rules HAVE changed. All they need is the discretion of the minister. There is no way that the Archbishop of Canterbury is going to say that the fifth in line to the throne cannot have his first marriage (to a woman whose first marriage was a civil one, lasted less than 2 years and produced no children) in the Church of England.

      • Sixer says:

        What Tina said. Divorced people are married up and down the country every week in CofE churches. It’s not simply permitted: it’s common. It’s at the discretion of the officiating minister.

      • Whaaaaaaatttt? says:

        The articles say that she is practically living with him. Is that allowed since the public pays for his housing? Where are the lines drawn with that?

      • Tina says:

        We’ve just paid hundreds of thousands of £ for a wardrobe for a person who does practically no work (Kate), and hundreds of millions of £ to a person to fix up a property that she was already supposed to be keeping up (TQ). The wear and tear and cost of the water that Meghan uses in Harry’s cottage is not exactly material.

      • Rose says:

        Also, Sophie lived with Prince Edward before they were married.

    • Tulip Garden says:

      I do love wedding photos of anyone plus the royals really do know how to do the big wedding thing!

      • Zapp Brannigan says:

        I can’t wait to see the hats, I love a good wedding hat and the royals are ace at that.

    • Amy says:

      She needs to tell her co stars to STFU about this relationship. Always using Harry and the Royal Family to promote that cheap show. But even that couldn’t save the ratings dropping.

      • Olga says:

        I only saw the Suits article yesterday. Her co stars always use his name to promote this show.

      • melissa says:

        Yes, I agree. He calls her his sister. Please. They are using Harry’s name for more fame. That show is a flop and the ratings will continue to drop, I assure you.

    • Lilac says:

      I think she is pretty but I am bummed that she changed her nose to look more white. As a mixed person, I think that really sucks. I get that it’s challenging getting roles in Hollywood if you look “too black” because people are a bunch of sh**y bigots, but ugh… I’ll be damned if anyone “makes” me change my looks to be more white/conventional

      If not for the nose change I would really be into her.

      At any rate, I think they are a good match. Didn’t his exes have a problem with being in the spotlight? She seems super comfortable in it. Hopefully they will do a lot of charity work.

      • Olga says:

        Kate also had two nose jobs. I just don’t think Meghan is pretty, matter of taste.

      • Luca76 says:

        Every actress gets a nose job. I’m not going to judge her for doing the same as many other white actresses because she’s very vocal and proud of her heritage.

      • Lilac says:

        @Luca76
        I’m very vocal and proud of my heritage, that’s why I want to look more white.
        Okay.

        I’m going to be unfair here and make the assumption you’re white/not mixed/no idea what I’m talking about.

      • Pip says:

        My grandfather was Jewish – my best friend’s mother (who didn’t want her to make friends with me because of that) told me that she assumed I’d be getting a nose job to get rid of my “Jewish nostrils”. Bwhahahahaha. WTAF?

        At the age of about ten I had no clue what she was on about or what the hell this “jewishness” was. Bitter old cow.

      • Luca76 says:

        I’m actually Black (half South African so African American) . So yeah that was a huge assumption. I am just saying I don’t hate on any actress that gets work done. So why would I be harder on a woman of African descent? Believe me I know all the pressures that get put on Black women coming from both sides. I don’t make those choices for myself but I don’t choose to hate on black women who make a different choice. And what’s the line? I remember my late father telling me that any black woman that died her hair blonde was betraying her race. So does that mean Beyoncé is a hypocrite for speaking out for BLM? I feel like it’s counterproductive.

      • An says:

        What is a white nose? An upturned miss piggy nose or a hook nose? Please do not make assumptions like that. I have what some ignorant people would call a “white nose”, straight etc but I am as black as black can be.

      • notasugarhere says:

        Amy, do you hate on Michelle Obama for her hair or for being friends with Letizia of Spain (oh no, friends with a white girl!)? You know, Letizia? The divorcee who married into the Spanish Royal Family in a full Catholic mass without problem?

        It appears she kicked out the cheating chef before Harry and she met. Harry pursued a free woman.

      • Can'tRecall says:

        Yes, she has black friends not that it should matter but she has several friends of color. She counts Serena Williams and Priyanka as friends. If you had not noticed Amy her father is cauc and most women date men like their dads not to mention you don’t have a clue to her complete dating history. SMH…AMY and the rest of the troll brigade need to get a grip.

      • Lady D says:

        Feeling a little vicious this morning are we Amy?

      • Mary mary says:

        Oh, please, I am mixed race and had a nose job in my late teens, it wasn’t about looking less ethnic, it was wanting to improve one’s looks..

        A subtle nose job is often to improve on a facial imperfection, so what is wrong with that?

    • Lilac says:

      I’m not familiar with Kate’s nose jobs. I haven’t been following the royals for very long; I’m pretty anti-monarchy :D
      Can you send a link, if you have one?

      • Olga says:

        Go to Google Images and search for “Kate Middleton plastic surgery” and “Kate Middleton nose job”. You’ll see the changes.

      • Lilac says:

        I don’t see it as clearly with Kate.
        With MM and other celebrities (e.g. ScarJo and KimK) it’s more obvious to me.
        Drives me a little crazy though! I get it if you have something really huge that needs to be changed, but why tweak your nose when you looked good in the first place?

      • sarri says:

        Kate’s nose is definitely thinner now. I think she had her first nose job after university.

      • Lilac says:

        Her old nose looks a little more bulbous to me but I can’t tell if it’s the photo angle

        ugh! why the nose jobs, celebs? why?

      • Can'tRecall says:

        @Lilac and all who assume they know…SHE hasn’t had a nose job. No matter how often you state is as fact…she has the same nose she had as a girl. The Sun has pics of her as a kid and well you can believe the altfacts of the troll brigade or your own eyes:

        https://www.thesun.co.uk/tvandshowbiz/2451704/meghan-markle-prince-harrys-girlfriend-suits/

    • perplexed says:

      She’s lost a lot of weight since then. Maybe the weight loss altered a face — she does look more Hollywood now, and usually weight loss helps with that.

      By 21st century standards, those pics don’t look THAT racy. I don’t know what I was expecting, but Kate Middleton showed way more on the runway when she was wearing lingerie (not that I thought even Kate looked all that racy either even in lingerie. Somehow she managed to make that stuff look kind of blah too).

      • Lilac says:

        +1 – totally agree with you
        In fact, after seeing her transition away from real to Hollywood, I sort of like his exes a little more now because they don’t look as fake/Hollywood to me, but I still think she’s probably a better match in terms of the work he has to do

      • Llamas says:

        When I was underweight my nose looked insanely different than it does now at a healthy weight. Although the nose doesn’t change the whole face does when it’s thinner making the nose look different.

      • littlemissnaughty says:

        This was also 2003. Nearly 14 years ago. Who even refers to 14-year-old pics when judging someone’s level of attractiveness?

        I think she’s very pretty but these pics are simply awful and by that I mean was that even a professional photographer? Not “racy” though. That’s how we dressed in 2003. If I could pull off that white top now, I’d probably wear it. She looks great in it.

      • imqrious2 says:

        I can definitely attest to this. I’ve lost a LOT of weight (170 lbs – don’t ask! lol) Now, at my thinnest, my nose looks MUCH bigger than it did before, as do my eyes (and I always had “big” Twiggy/Goldie Hawn type eyes). No more full cheeks to make them look smaller by comparison! lol Now, I gently contour my nose (way too chicken for a nose job lol). But yes, a fuller face can definitely changed features.

      • LanaK says:

        You must be blind, your pictures prove the opposite of what you said. No big deal, lots ladies have nose jobs nowadays!

    • minx says:

      All I can see when I look at her is her nose job.

    • Can'tRecall says:

      Actually she HAS NOT HAD A NOSE JOB. I know the troll brigade are used to stating their lies as if they are proven truth but she has had the exact same nose since before puberty.
      https://www.thesun.co.uk/tvandshowbiz/2451704/meghan-markle-prince-harrys-girlfriend-suits/

      If you are bright enough to realize the face changes with puberty and that she has lost weight you’d realize she hasn’t had a nose job. Neither has she had implants as they are found of claiming.

      • Amanduh says:

        Kinda love her even more now that I know she is/was a calligrapher??!!
        She caught my eye about 4 years ago on a Reitman’s commercial…I remember thinking how gorgeous she was!!

      • LanaK says:

        Your eyes see what they want to see. She has had the tip narrowed at minimum, why defend? Is it a crime to have a nosejob?

    • HappyMom says:

      I think she’s really pretty. I don’t think these are particularly good pictures-but they’re older. And most actresses, if they want to do tv or movies, have had some work done.

    • Sarah says:

      I dont think they will marry. Everyone here is all excited, but they havent been together long, most of the time they lived separately, and the press will crucify her. She has a lot of racy pics out there, she comes from a totally different world, and i cant imagine his group of pampered rich white “nobility” accepting her. Not a Rx for a long and healthy marriage. The best marriages are tough without the extreme pressures they will have on them.
      They should take it slow, but she is 35, pregnancy is tougher if it’s your first, so they may rush it. I think she should have fun, and then run like hell.
      And dont bother calling me a “stan” or whatever. Im 55, dont even know what that means, and think Harry is a cute young guy who is pretty clueless about the real world. I witnessed the tragedies of Diana and Fergie, two women who actually understood that world, and it still crushed them.

      • HappyMom says:

        I think though that there has been so much pushback against “The Gray Men” who made Fergie and Diana’s lives hell. And even though I think William and Kate are work-shy and a waste in their roles, they have definitely set the tone. They are not dictated to. It’s very different than it was in the 80s.

    • Barbara says:

      Me either.

    • Rose says:

      I think she is very pretty—especially when she smiles.

      • wolfpup says:

        Finally, a chance to butt in about nose jobs and other criticisms of this natural sweetheart – hahaha! So sorry for making fun at ya’all, but Jiminy-crickets!!! I almost feel as though I need to bring out my own roster of beauty marks, in order to have some credibility – but even then, yuk, “you weirdo’s” – should I underline my natural button nose inherited from Wales – hahahah!!! Megan is absolutely beautiful – and unique in all the world!

        These two lovers are a complete circuit: sun, moon and Us.
        There is nothing so beautiful, as two people in love.

        Personally, I bless and bless and bless…

  4. AT says:

    They are super cute together. As Harry was seriously lacking any PDA whenever he was seen with Cressida, it’s nice to see him holding hands with Meghan in the pics. This feels like a grown-up relationship, not some puppy love.

  5. Talie says:

    The way you’ll know something serious is happening is if Hollywood Reporter or Deadline reports that Meghan is being written out of Suits.

    • Sharon Lea says:

      I first thought you wrote they had announced it, but yes, that would be a definite sign.

      They look good together! :)

  6. Maria says:

    i assume they will only get married once she is not on the show anymore? Does that work for the Royal family, if the wife of one of their princes has a job on a different continent? Is she expected to fulfill royal duties once they marry?

  7. Maria says:

    also one of my pet peeves: wearing a beanie with a suit and without a coat. If you are that cold on your head, why are you not wearing a coat or at least a scarf?

    • Sharon Lea says:

      He probably thinks it helps him be incognito. I remember William wearing a baseball hat when he and Kate would go to the movies in North Wales.

    • Maria says:

      My first reaction was, she sure as hell isn’t in Toronto. It’s minus whatever. Lucky for her, she doesn’t have to come back until April when she resumes filming.

    • chaine says:

      not cold, hiding bald spot

    • bluhare says:

      Not to mention the red hair. That was my first thought; hiding his hair.

      • wolfpup says:

        I would like to understand the drama around red hair – did it come from Neolithic mating, or is this excuse for not being loving, from Prince Charles’ particular take on the drama between him and his beautiful wife? Actually, Who Cares about this? What is there to say, but God Speed Our sweet dreams…? {{{and ALWAYS walk away from bad drama, MY DEARIES…}}}

        This racial stuff is pretty weird, you guys…

        (I have to mention, I am a woman, saying the words, “you guys”, forgive me…I must be old; believing in the female young. We are powerful, if we do not give our power away to men, who are seldom worthy of that devotion. Babies complicate. Life is so worth living!

  8. Fluff says:

    Oh but I thought they broke up months ago and he was never serious about her in the first place and he actually hates her and is trying his best to get ride of her and anyone saying otherwise was just Meghan herself commenting online under a million fake usernames??

    Are you saying Tumblr LIED to me? /shockedface/

  9. LOLADOESTHEHULA says:

    It’s so sweet that they’ve remained such good friends after the break up, don’t you think so Amy, Kitty et al. ? ;-) #alternativefacts

  10. Megan says:

    Good for them. I think they are a great match.

  11. kaiC says:

    YEAH. I am way more excited about these pictures than I should be… They look great together.

  12. Nosy says:

    Just came to say I’ve got serious hair envy. It’s like hair commercial hair she has! I think she’s gorgeous, he’s handsome, they do make a hot couple just based on looks alone!

  13. Spiderpig says:

    Tumblr are insisting the photos are old/faked and that’s Meghan intentionally released photoshopped pics to carry on the hoax that she’s dating him.

    Tumblr: where Alt Facts meets Fandom.

    • Lilac says:

      That’s pretty funny!

    • Sixer says:

      I bet she fakes a couple of pregnancies after they have a fake marriage because the CofE has never married a divorcee ever, ever, ever. And I bet she fakes the noses of the babies by getting them cosmetic surgery while they’re still in utero. Even the utero bit will itself be faked.

      I’m not even sure Harry is a ginger. Bloody fake news. Can’t be sure of anything these days.

      • SilverUnicorn says:

        A FAKED twin pregnancy!! :D

        Some people should really need to step off the electronic devices they use to connect to the internet!!

      • Olenna says:

        LOL!

        P.S. I’m so happy the DM didn’t get the scoop on this date first!

      • Maria says:

        Those two people probably don’t even exist. All made up. We are so gullible.

      • Sixer says:

        I’m beginning to wonder if even the Queen is true. I’m thinking David Icke was right all along and the whole thing is just a family of lizards. With fake noses.

      • Fluff says:

        Guys guys don’t get freaked out but what if WE’RE the ones who are fake?

        I mean, I’m sitting on what feels like a real couch, eating what feels like real baked beans on toast, but maybe I’m just an elaborate sentient robot invented by Hollywood PR?

      • Sixer says:

        OMG. You’re right. The higher power is no more than a scientist from an uber-advanced civilisation and we are microbes in his petri dish.

      • Liberty says:

        Sixer, is there even really a “Toronto”? You know?

        Also I think when we ride the tube they are putting chemicals into the air to make us think we have arrived at Sloane Square or High Street K, but we are really in a soy field.

        My neighbor’s cousin’s aunt’s friend also said she bought a packet of crisps once and Prince Harry was NOWHERE around. So.

      • Spiderpig says:

        To be fair, I would definitely question reality if I arrived at High Street Kensington, such is the woefulness of District Line branch line service (one of which I am sadly as of very recently living on).

      • wolfpup says:

        Thank you Sixer and friends, for putting me in la la la and laughs di dah!!!

    • M says:

      There are so many creepy and delusional tumblrs — it really is the home for wackos. The garner-affleck tumblr, for instance…

      • redsolesista says:

        These are the same people that still think Kristen Stewart and Robert Pattinson have a secret marriage and secret babies. She isn’t in a relationship with a woman and he isn’t in a relationship with a black woman. SMH

      • Fluff says:

        Tumblr is basically Opposite World. Any male celeb who is married, has kids, or is in a long-term publicly acknowledged relationship is actually faking the entire thing and secretly either in love with some co-star or single and waiting for their fangirl soulmate to come along.

        But any two people who have ever worked together but never dated, are actually secretly married with three invisible babies and keeping the entire thing secret.

    • M.A.F. says:

      God bless Tumblr in these trouble times.

  14. Luca76 says:

    For whatever reason I think they’ll date for a full year before they get engaged. But I totally see them getting married and they better do the huge Royal wedding. I need a frivolous spectacle right now.

  15. perplexed says:

    If they have a wedding, Donald Trump will throw a hissy fit if he’s not invited.

    • HappyMom says:

      I think because he’s the spare they don’t need to invite heads of state. I bet Michelle Obama will be there though!

      • MellyMel says:

        Oh Michelle and Barack will definitely be there. I’d be really surprised if they weren’t. And Trump will probably make a snide comment about it on Twitter but that’s nothing new.

      • Sharon Lea says:

        Yes! I bet they would attend too. I also think they would attend the Invicitus Games in Toronto this summer because of their friendship.

      • Deedee says:

        I hope they invite people associated with Harry’s charities.

    • Bc says:

      Can we keep US politics out of this please? It is getting annoying. Let me read something involving BRF without having to read about someone’s political view in US. Please please. Just let me enjoy reading something that has nothing to do concerning our country . Just a grandma working 60+ hours a week… need a little downtime on Friday night. I love reading opinions of people across the world

      • Tina says:

        You know what? No. Everyone outside of your country has to care about yours 24/7, so no, you don’t get to read about the BRF outside of US political views. Charles cares about politics (climate change). Harry cares about politics (Michelle Obama). William and Kate don’t care about anything besides their own laziness. I am sorry that you have to work so hard. But you have to work hard because your country has no social welfare protection. And that comes down to politics.

      • Tanguerita says:

        if you love reading opinions of people across the world, then deal with the opinions above – ot just scroll down. We wouldn’t have to discuss this orange ball of nasty, if he wasn’t a president of USA. And yes, thanks Tina for summing it up nicely.

      • perplexed says:

        Trump wanted to date Princess Diana (despite calling her crazy), and tried to invite himself to Chelsea Clinton’s wedding therefore, Trump having a Twitter tantrum because of a lack of an invite honestly doesn’t seem to be out of the realm of possibility. I think a Twitter meltdown could very well happen. So I do think my comment is relevant in the case of a Harry wedding.

  16. Lucy says:

    This makes me happy for Harry. They look really good together. AND (superficial note) she has fantastic hair.

  17. PettyRiperton says:

    I hope that if Meghan does marry him she keeps her stylist and/or makeup artist because that other princess is always looking bland and old. Which is a shame because Kate’s a pretty girl I don’t know if she has really bad taste or it’s just a royal thing.

    • notasugarhere says:

      If her stylist or makeup person is in Toronto, she’d have trouble keeping them or having them around often enough.

      Fun note. Letizia of Spain still uses the same makeup and hair person she had when she was a newscaster.

  18. M says:

    All those little girls/old ladies in the DM comments section were so sure that they had broken up over New Year’s. LOL.

    • HappyMom says:

      Right?? Because they’d supposedly stopped following each other on instagram? And she’s just out for publicity! And her awful family! And she talks to the press! She’s not a real classy lady like Kate! (Did I cover them all?)

    • Sarah says:

      Nice ageist comment. Lovely.

  19. Nika says:

    They truly do look great together. And she looks so good!

  20. dumbledork says:

    Maybe she ate some of those magic potatoes that Olivia Munn eats that completely changes your face.

  21. Susan Forsythe says:

    Oh come on, even Harry knows better than this! I didn’t and still don’t approve of Camilla, but she don’t count because she will never be Queen, but even she has the common sense to know if this truly happened between the prince n Meagan, it will begin the downfall of the monarchy! I do love Meagan but for Harry to honestly believe his subjects would stand for it, this writer believes he would be sadly mistaken. And this comes from an American citizen. Most of America is against it. Good gawd, Harry is next in line right after Wills. I feel real strongly if he were to do the unthinkable and marry Meagan, and was ever to have to step up to King, his subjects would call for him to abdicate his thrown, like King Edward v111. The world is going through some really ecclectic changes right now, and what it comes down to, is that the people are looking for leadership and consistent familiarity. Royals don’t mingle, that’s why everyone wants to be royal. Blue bloods. I believe even Di would say, I love you, Harr but you know that you can marry her but you could never ever be King with her as your Queen. I might be wrong, but they( those in charge), will never let her in because she is biracial. I personally don’t care but I do care about the both Princes ,Kate and kids. This is going to turn out real bad/sad. I wished he would have picked on Sarah Rafferty instead. Everyone would have been excited. They would have related her persona to Sarah Ferguson. And though she was the royal black sheep , the people accepted her.

    • Pip says:

      #alternative facts

      • Sarah says:

        I dont think so. Racism is alive and well, as sad as it makes me to say that. Her life will be brutal.

      • Reece says:

        @Sarah As someone with similar skin color and background as Meghan I can tell you she has already had to deal with racism, from both sides of the color spectrum. Not that it won’t bother her but you do have to develop a thick skin.

    • KB says:

      Harry isn’t next in line after William. It’s William’s son George, then his daughter Charlotte, then Harry.

    • Jaii says:

      😳… never knew Harry had such intense fans , or people actively cared that much ! Don’t get me wrong I’m as fond of Harry as the next , but I just didn’t realise he had actual stans ….

    • TotallyBiased says:

      “Most of America is against it”–who ARE you?

    • Tina says:

      I hate to break it to you, but Camilla is going to be Queen Consort. And this “subject” (we’re not, by the way, we’re citizens) is delighted, as are many others. Most people in the UK are completely indifferent, with a minority who are pleased and a tiny minority who are displeased.

    • littlemissnaughty says:

      Thank you, that was such an amusing read. But I suggest you slow down on the alcoholic beverages and Wikipedia that sh*t. As Pip above mentions, those are some alternative facts if I’ve ever seen them.

      Unless you’re joking. Then I kinda love you.

      • Guesto says:

        I’m going with parody since I refuse to believe anyone could seriously hold those opinions. So yeah, funny!

        I particularly liked “Royals don’t mingle, that’s why everyone wants to be royal.” :D

      • Olenna says:

        You guys are being kind. To cop a phrase from Dr. E. M. Dyson about drumpf, this chick has been “unmolested by enlightenment”.

      • Sarah says:

        Why are you all so commited to this marriage? It’s weird here sometimes, to see people attack people with a different opinion over people you dont know, and will never meet. So odd.

      • littlemissnaughty says:

        Sarah, don’t even. That post is not expressing an opinion, it’s stating these so-called alternative facts. So … bullsh*t. That’s not odd?

        And why are we “committed” to this marriage? Because we need some happy news.

    • Moneypenny says:

      Is this “most of America is against it” like “most of America voted for Trump”?

      I’m glad you said “I do love Megan” though. It’s like saying “I have a black friend” before saying something very racist.

    • imqrious2 says:

      @Susanne, DO NOT speak for THIS American! HONK for Meghan and Harry!!!

    • Angel says:

      This article must have been posted somewhere weird…so much weird today here.

    • redsolesista says:

      “I might be wrong, but they( those in charge), will never let her in because she is biracial. I personally don’t care but I do care about the both Princes ,Kate and kids.”

      Oh you care, you care ALOT! You took the time to write a 1,536 character comment about Prince Harry possibly marrying a Bi-racial, divorced, American. Apparently none of those descriptives matter negatively to Harry . If those things really truly matter to the royals as much as they mean to you, I don’t think they would even be dating. IMO

      It is always interesting to me to see SOME (don’t come for me) white women have a breakdown, if a famous (or not famous at all) white man is with a woman of color. They go to great lengths to explain why he cant be with her. As if they had any chance of being with said men themselves, white or not. SMH

    • mar_time says:

      Most of America is against it??? Where are you getting your information from cause we’d love this union!! And yes to the obamas attending their wedding…the people NEED this! 🙏🏻

    • SusanneToo says:

      Satire, right?

    • Sarah says:

      I don’t agree with everything you said, but if this election has taught us anything, it is that racism may hide, but it is alive and well in the US and maybe England too. This may not be an issue for Harry, who will always be the beloved one, but the racists and press and much of the citizenry will set their sights on her and it will be brutal.
      I would again advise her to have fun, then run like hell!

      • Tina says:

        Oh, racism is very much alive and well in both the US and the UK. And the racists will indeed set their sights upon her. But the vast majority of the press and the citizenry will support their ginger prince and his love. I believe that much of the British people. I do not think they will reject her.

      • Bc says:

        Racism is alive in some or most minds because there exists an idea that nothing is ever going change. Boy, the majority of you didn’t grow up in the 50s and 60s in southern US. This country has suffered through many nightmares that were real. But doesn’t ANYONE SEE the tremendous steps we as a people have made comparing now with the 60s. And the 60s abuse came with democratic leadership? I’m amazed that no one knows their history, …….

      • Tina says:

        I’m sorry, you’re claiming that the democrats are to “blame” for the civil rights changes in the 1960s? The Civil Rights Act is one of the most progressive pieces of legislation ever passed in the United States. Who, precisely, are you praising for the “tremendous steps” that have been taken since then? The republicans? What did they do?

      • Nic919 says:

        LBJ only helped pushed through the Civil Rights Bill. No biggie I guess. Whereas the republicans took in the racist Dixiecrats and have allowed the white supremacists to flourish in their parties with the culmination being Cheeto and Bannon. Great job republicans!!

      • Lobbit says:

        I mean, she’s a 35 year old woman of color. Rest assured that racism isn’t new to her. She’s lived with it in some form for her entire life – that’s just the reality of being a person of color in the US, England, and everywhere else. You can’t outrun racism.

    • cynic says:

      This American cheers the relationship. I honestly think most Americans don’t care.

    • Tanguerita says:

      @Susan – are you even for real or just a sad troll?

  22. ellieohara says:

    This is going down better in the US than it is in the UK.

    I personally hope this is the beginning of the paring back of the royal family to something more similar to the european royals. My guess is that when the queen dies, the royal family is done at this level.

    • xo says:

      Yes, my sense is that adjustment is coming and it is inevitable. I think William & Harry have both craved a greater sense of normalcy for themselves, anyway.

    • Carey says:

      Why is it not going down well in the UK? Is it simply racism or general weariness with the Royals or something else?

      • Tina says:

        I’m sure the mouth-breathers on the Daily Mail don’t like it, but most people in the UK simply don’t care. Most people who do care about the royals will be happy for Harry. I still believe that this is a progressive country, despite Brexit.

      • Fluff says:

        It’s not “not going down well” in the UK, that’s just a line/lie the anti-Meghan nutters/Harry stans have invented to give their hate campaign more ammunition.

        Pretty much all the people I’ve seen throwing tantrums about this obviously not British (and many appear to be American, judging by their terminology). And ime, Americans/the American media are far more obsessed with the RF than we are.

        Most Brits couldn’t care less about the royals one way or another, but both Meghan and Harry are liked just fine here, with the exception of the reactionary ‘bring back hanging’ racist Daily Mail commenters. They certainly aren’t especially unpopular (like Camilla used to be).

  23. Cha Cha Slide says:

    So if reports are correct in that they started dating around the summer of 2016, I doubt they would get engaged until the end of 2017, at the soonest. Yes, they’re in their 30s and may know what they want, but that doesn’t mean that taking the time to truly get to know each other isn’t important. But say they get married in the summer of 2018, at the absolute soonest. Meghan will be nearly 37 years old. Many women take at least a year to conceive a baby at that age. There’s nothing wrong with that and certainly nothing wrong with having children in your late 30s. It simply takes longer. So even if they started trying for a baby immediately after their wedding, she would be nearly 39 when she has their first child. I obviously cannot speak for Harry, but for some reason I always pictured him with 3-4 kids. And he has spoken in the past on numerous occasions about how badly he wants children, plural. I’m an American and my life will not be affected whatsoever by his decision to marry either Meghan or some other woman. But statistics and biology are simply not on her side to give him 3-4 children. However, I wish them nothing but happiness, whether they choose to marry or to go their separate ways. I would love to hear other’s opinions about this. Do you think they will eventually break up, given her age?

    • notasugarhere says:

      I presume Harry and Meghan know each other’s ages.

      Rania and Abdullah II met in August, married the following June.

      Letizia and Felipe were engaged around the 5 month mark, married in May (about a year after they started dating).

      Holly Hunter gave birth to twins at 48. Laura Linney and Janet Jackson gave birth at 49.

      Victoria of Sweden had her son at 38. Mary of Denmark had twins at 38. Angela of Liechtenstein had her son at 42.

      Sophie Wessex had Louise at 38 (with many complications). James at 42 without complications. Sophie admitted that she would make use of IVF if necessary, so the BRF doesn’t have any objections to that if needed. IVF success is by no means a given, but these are people who would have no monetary restrictions if they needed reproductive help.

    • Jumpingthesnark says:

      I had my first kid at age 39 and my second at age 41. Took 2 cycles of trying the low tech old fashioned way for each. And I’m not alone in this. I know for some women ii is more difficult to get pregnant with advancing age, but it doesn’t mean that this is the case for everyone.

    • xo says:

      Could they adopt?

    • Maria says:

      i don’t think they would break up for that reason. Anyway, why can’t they adopt? Not like the royal line is that great. They have had their share of scoundrels and what not. This is 2017 not the Victorian era.

    • wolfpup says:

      My opinion is that they will have lots of babies – from all around the world. What is better than loving all babies?

  24. Maria says:

    I never found him attractive in general. But I actually think they make a surprisingly good looking couple. They look good together!

    • An says:

      They look alike to me. Their nose shapes are similar, as well as their eye shape and lower half of the face. Very interesting.

      • xo says:

        @An: Yes, that was the thing I found most interesting when news of their relationship first broke. In my experience, we often feel an increased (false?) sense of familiarity when we meet people whose facial structure mirrors our own. I was inclined to believe the rumors of a relationship based on that alone, frankly.

        That initial sense of intimacy can be misleading though, so that’s something to note.

  25. Pandy says:

    Big deal if she got a nose job. Why would we assume it’s to cover her black heritage and not that she just never liked it and had the $$ to do something about it? I love that her “racy” pix are something a 13 yo would post on Instagram. She’s hardly showing any flesh. Hard to believe/refreshing. i wish them luck. Why not?

  26. An says:

    Harry wouldn’t be the first royal to marry an actress.
    His cousin, Lord frederick windsor, also married an actress who is jewish which for UK royals is a huge deal historically.

  27. suze says:

    She’s a beautiful woman, she seems modern (hopefully she won’t go full Katie Bucket when they marry) and I hope we see some of the wedding. I suspect it won’t be the spectacle the Cambridge wedding, but we deserve a few glimpses, damn it. And flying Elvi.I haven’t given up on that dream.

    • Maria says:

      I don’t think I could take two Katie Buckets!

    • my3cents says:

      Love her!
      She works and does charity of her own free will – this one is definitely an upgrade for the firm!
      The Dolittles are already starting to sweat.
      Go Girl!

  28. A says:

    I don’t know for sure, and I’m basing this on absolutely NO evidence at all–but something tells me that they may have been dating for longer than some folks think. Something just gives me that impression. Like I said, I have no evidence, and no factual way of knowing anything about this, but. Still. It’s also good to hear that her trip to India was fairly low-key. I can’t imagine that the organization she made the trip on behalf of would have appreciated the tabloid press following her and taking the focus away from what she made the trip for. This makes it seem like she is focused on charity work when that’s what the focus should be on, so that’s good.

    At any rate, I’m glad they’re not broken up! :) I don’t know why or how some people can root for someone else’s relationship to fail. Even if you don’t like the people involved, that’s a big thing to wish someone, especially two people who seem to be happy with each other.

  29. HoustonGrl says:

    Sads, I always assumed I’d end up with Harry #Altfacts.

  30. Rocio says:

    Cute couple! She’s 35! I thought she was 25ish. She is from Gabrielle Union club. Her nose is kind of weird though, giving me some Michael Jackson vibes. I will never understand why people F* up with their noses!

    • Can'tRecall says:

      Again keep trying. That’s the nose she’s had since childhood. No matter if you do or don’t like it or the vibes it gives you.

      • Snowflake says:

        @cantrecall
        I thought she had gotten a nose job too but that video you posted shows her nose has always been like that. I think because it curves up at the tip, it looks like something a plastic surgeon would do.

    • wolfpup says:

      Jesus ! Nose jobs! Perhaps one should look at the kindness in her eyes, the light, the sparkle of Megan.

      Why is this about race? – #alternativefacts…

      I will cry about this if you don’t stop.

  31. seesittellsit says:

    I’m wondering if the brouhaha around BREXIT will require them to delay an engagement and big royal wedding. It wouldn’t be the first time in any of the royal houses of Europe that an engagement had to wait upon more settled political times. . .

    • Tina says:

      Nah. The government would be all for it. Circuses to distract from the fact that the economy’s going to take a nose dive.

      • seesittellsit says:

        Could go either way – if things get violent with demonstrations, I’m betting they’ll ask them to wait until Article 50 is through all the hoops and there are no more doubts and it’s just a question of what kind of exit deal is on the table. On the other hand, the government/BRF could be betting on the distraction circus. Royal weddings cost a lot, remember – you don’t want people pointing to the millions spent on security and street decorations to marry off Harry while everyone has an anxious eye on the economy due to BREXIT. Or they could have a quieter wedding to demonstrate how they care about such things – but then they’d lose the big circus.

        These are the questions that keep me up at night. Beats politics and car payments and job stress.

      • Tina says:

        There won’t be any violent demonstrations. Any possible violence is on the Brexiters’ side, and they got what they wanted. Once it gets through Parliament (which it will), the process will proceed smoothly. The economic effects will definitely be felt, but they will not take effect immediately. The people who complain about the cost of royal weddings will complain in any event, and they are generally not Brexiters.

  32. a reader says:

    i love this couple sooooooo much! i want to see this engagement happen!

    suck it, haters!!! <3 <3 <3

  33. PennyLane says:

    I’m looking forward to watching racist people’s heads explode at the engagement announcement. Fingers crossed!

  34. Bonzo says:

    If I was her, I’d be pushing to get married sooner rather than later. No matter how wonderful having full access to his junk may be, I couldn’t stand being hunkered down in his cottage and cooped up for weeks.

    • Sarah says:

      How will getting married get her more freedom? I think they will always be in a gilded prison.

      • Bonzo says:

        If they’re married she’ll be doing official engagements *with* him, rather than being stuck back at his cottage unable to go out in public without a really good disguise. The former is still a measurable improvement over the latter.

        I’d hate that life myself, but she must be considering it something she can live with if she’s living with him at this point.

    • seesittellsit says:

      @Bonzo – well, the first thing she’ll have to learn, as Kate has had to, is that once inside this particular magic circle, what she wants has to take a back seat to other interests – style of thing.

  35. Vinot says:

    Very short engagement, I should think. Like, they’ll announce the engagement after the wedding is planned. Summer bride.

    • jules says:

      As they say in sex and the city it’s not love his lights on. Happened to my brother got to a point in his life decided he’d marry and the next woman that came along he did. They now have two kids and are a lovely couple was it earth shattering love no but they’ve grown into it and now there blissfully happy. Happens to women too, once the decisions made they do it they’re simply tired of looking, and the more that people bash her and drag him the more he’ll dig his heels in happened to my brother too. let them get on with it. no other woman wants to marry him shes comfortable in the spotlight so i say go for it everyone deserves happiness.

  36. Lobbit says:

    Just give me a royal wedding. We deserve a royal wedding.

  37. dorothy says:

    damn amy , your hate on is showing (im mixed race before you jump on my race status too btw) had i her nose I may have fixed it too. thats hollywood (by the way my nose is worse but I’m not trying to live as an actress in Hollywood)

  38. Mimi says:

    Showing my age but this reminds me of Jordan Catalano taking Angela’s hand in that iconic hallway scene on My So Called Life. So many feels. Off to watch Buffalo Tom videos.

  39. terry says:

    All I can think is peter pan syndrome the boy that never grew up, it’s them against the world.

  40. Elaine says:

    Romantic evening out.

    Look!

    She’s wearing HIS SHIRT!!!

    So cute!
    Megs forever!
    Markle Princess Sparkle…

  41. Reece says:

    I just need to know the date because I fully intend to be the crazy woman outside fully dressed in Union Jack/Old Glory ensemble!
    HA!

    • wolfpup says:

      Glory Be to all Colours! Praise be to Us loving One Another…honestly, who hasn’t admired the beautiful tones of brown and beautiful? White is pretty – but so is Other than I, and my child is Mine, whatever. Any child is full of hope, and, seriously, why is the conversation coded white?

      Shame to any who creates an alternative!

  42. bitchy says:

    I think that Markle will use Harry to get her name and the name of her TV show into the news. The ratings of her show are dropping and she is nowhere near a secure career as an actress, not to speak of a stellar career. I haven’t yet seen enough to judge her talent. She seems to take on parts that require her to play an upfront ambitious career girl which seems to fit her character quite well anyway (judging by her interviews). Markle’s colleagues from her show do allegedly name-drop Harry left and right.

    I think Markle will drop Harry as soon as: when she no longer needs him. for now she needs to make news and she needs a career.

    If you look at Markle a bit more closely then it is hard to imagine she would want to become a Royal wife character-wise and spirit-wise. She is outspoken and ambitious and very much into self-promotion. I can’t quite imagine that such a woman would voluntarily limit herself to a Royal life like that doormat Waity Katie.

  43. jenny says:

    As they say in sex and the city it’s not love his lights on. Happened to my brother got to a point in his life decided he’d marry and the next woman that came along he did. They now have two kids and are a lovely couple was it earth shattering love no but they’ve grown into it and now there blissfully happy. Happens to women too, once the decisions made they do it they’re simply tired of looking, and the more that people bash her and drag him the more he’ll dig his heels in happened to my brother too. let them get on with it. no other woman wants to marry him shes comfortable in the spotlight so i say go for it everyone deserves happiness.