Will Prince Harry visit his father again ‘fairly soon’ or will he wait a while?

Since I can barely keep track of all of Prince Harry’s lawsuits and court appearances, it would make sense if he was due back in the UK in the next few months on legal business. While he settled with the Mirror in February, he still has pending cases against News UK (the Murdochs) and the Mail (ANL), in addition to his appeal on his royal protection issue. Plus, Harry will likely go to the UK in May for that ten-year-anniversary event for Invictus. I bring this up because that royal biographer Tom Quinn is trying to make it sound like Harry will be heading back to the UK soon, but solely to see his father.

Prince Harry has revealed his plans to return to the UK and one royal expert believes it could happen sooner than fans think. The Duke of Sussex made a brief return to London last month after his father King Charles was diagnosed with cancer. Harry then gave a rare interview during which he announced he will be returning to the UK again, but he didn’t provide any exact dates.

Royal author Tom Quinn suggested Harry’s return could be “fairly soon”. Speaking exclusively to The Mirror, Tom said Harry will want to show the world “he is a caring member of the Royal Family.”

“The fact that he lost his High Court challenge will definitely make him think twice about coming back to the UK, but on the other hand, he feels under enormous pressure to show the world that he is a caring member of the Royal Family and the only way he can show he cares is to visit his father, even if that is difficult because Meghan won’t want to come and he is still completely unable to make things up with his brother,” Tom said.

He added: “The key thing is that it will look terrible if Harry doesn’t visit his father again – and fairly soon – because Harry and Meghan have made being caring and sharing a central part of their mission, their brand. How will it look if Harry cares about injured soldiers but doesn’t seem to care much about his stricken father?”

[From The Mirror]

Yeah, the fact that Harry immediately rushed to England when he was informed about his father’s cancer diagnosis did show that he cared. He cared more than his brother, who at that time had still not seen Charles in person (and waited a few more weeks to see Charles). Harry adores his dogsh-t father and absolutely wants to visit his dad, but I suspect Harry won’t make another dedicated trip to see Charles anytime soon. Maybe I’m wrong, Harry surprises me sometimes. My guess is that Harry will probably wait until he has other business, like a court appearance or something. As the royal-protection case showed everyone, the Windsors do the most to put the Sussexes in danger constantly, and I doubt Harry will step foot in the UK again without his father ensuring that he has police protection, and Charles probably plays fast and loose with all of that.

Photos courtesy of Cover Images.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

31 Responses to “Will Prince Harry visit his father again ‘fairly soon’ or will he wait a while?”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. I see they are trying to goad Harry back to visit his sickly father. Next it will be he doesn’t want to visit him then it will be Chuckles is needing to see Harry and we will wrap it all up in a neat and tidy bow with Chuckles doesn’t want to see Harry. Rinse and repeat.

    • BayTampaBay says:

      Is KCIII much more ill than we know?

      Does Tom Quinn know something about the progression of KCIII’s illness that we do not?

      • Carmen says:

        In Touch Weekly is reporting Charles has pancreatic cancer. I don’t think they would make such a devastating report without corroboration from a reliable source, but I’ll believe it if/when I see it in the New York Times.

  2. ML says:

    What is the definition of soon?

    I think Harry is going to go back soon. If he can, he will combine visiting his father with business in England. It’s really difficult to cut someone out of your life who doesn’t love you in the way you need to be loved, and it’s normal to show grace when someone is in ill health. You need to be able to look yourself in the mirror at the end of the day, and I think H will want to make sure he did everything in his power to connect to his father.

    • Robert Phillips says:

      Harry will go to England for something or other and would love to see his father. But will Charles see him? That’s the problem. Charles will demand that Harry meet him somewhere totally inconvient for Harry. And demand Harry come to see him and stay with him. Instead of going to one of Charles dozens of other residences he owns.

  3. Amy Bee says:

    Nah Harry’s not making a very special visit to the UK. He’ll go if he has business in the UK. He eluded to visiting Charles when he transits through London. Tom Quinn should jist say he wants Harry to come to the UK more often.

    • BeanieBean says:

      And let’s not forget, one of those visits Harry made last year to London had Charles scampering off to the country or something to avoid Harry. Sorry, no time to see you, sonny boy!

  4. Cathy says:

    Yet another “royal expert” telling the royals what they should be doing? Sigh. Has this one ever even spoken to a Royal? Or even been in the same room with one? But yet he still feels compelled to tell them what they should do and think?

  5. Brassy Rebel says:

    If Harry returns before he has actual business to conduct in GB, it will totally convince me that Charles is much sicker than we have been led to believe. The way he rushed over there when he first learned of the diagnosis was the first clue that we had that this was the case.

  6. Tessa says:

    Charles should apologize to meghan.

  7. Feeshalori says:

    Harry doesn’t need these rota bottom feeders to tell him when to visit his father and how to behave in a filial manner. He what he has to do when he has to do it.

  8. Faye says:

    I think the next time could be that Church service on 8th May for Invictus while he’s in London. He’ll have a reason (not that he needs one) to travel and it will be up to the King whether he arranges for his son to see him or not. We already know they like to jerk him about, but at least he wouldn’t be making the journey just to see him and his whole travel won’t be wasted.

  9. ohwell says:

    Harry come back, come back Harry!!

    Please Harry, beg your evil brother and sister in law for forgiveness , ditch your young family in the sunshine state and comeback and be a third wheel. Come back and be at the mercy of the tabloid media, dog-shit father and step mother.

  10. Rnot says:

    So Charles is definitely terminal then.

    • Cessily says:

      That was my take on this desperate narrative. I’m sorry but they don’t get to shame the son who flew over 10,000 miles roundtrip to only be allowed in his father’s presence for a 45 minute meeting. I hope Prince Harry stays home and starves the media for content. A 45 minute meeting should be a zoom call not an overseas round trip flight.

      • Kingston says:

        Why say “allowed?” Thats the narrative of the shitmedia, not Harry’s.

        H had a schedule. He had a plane to catch so he could get bk home by a certain time, deal wth jetlag, and be at a function for which his attendance was long in the secret planning & logistics.

        The time he allotted to the meeting wth his father was whatever time he had to spare to fit chucky into his busy schedule.

        In fact, H’s flight was a bit late & chucky had to wait. So tht also forced a time crunch on the meeting because H had a scheduled flight to catch to return home.

        Folks who make the mistake of centering britain, the royals and the narratives of the britshitmedia in H&M’s life will ALWAYS miss the real story.

      • Where'sMyTiara says:

        Didn’t Harry also meet with his UK lawyers that afternoon after his meeting w/ “Ray from the trailer park” while “Linda from two trailers down” seethed outside the room b/c she wasn’t allowed to be privy to the conference between father and son?

        (sorry but ever since I saw that redneck royal roundup from thevolunteertexan on TikTok I can’t get it out of my head lol)

  11. Chantale says:

    This post should come with a warning that the Mirror does not know what H is up to because he does not talk to these tabloids. Fantasy, I swear these people write about H&M with their hands between their ” th**g or towel. H&M get them going more ways than one.🙄😏

  12. Beverley says:

    We will be getting so many more of these overwrought articles speculating on what Harry will do, whether Meghan will “allow” him, and whether they’ll bring the children to Britain so that the rota rats and The Firm can mock and abuse them.

    It’s all so tedious and tiresome. But I agree that it says something about Charles’ prognosis. I like to think that if Charles is terminal, he’ll get his house in order and at the very least make a sincere and heartfelt apology to Harry and Meghan. It doesn’t have to be public, but at least make things right. God, the Fates,, the Ancestors, the Universe…whomever…knows that Charles did wrong by the Sussexes. Maybe his conscience will finally work the way it should…

  13. Charfromdarock says:

    “even if that is difficult because Meghan won’t want to come”

    Ahhh yes, it’s all her fault. FFS.

  14. Mary Pester says:

    Two points, Harry’s security issue is going to appeal, and it isn’t an “issue” it’s a stain on Charles and the whole Monarchys reputation that the king is willing to put his son, daughter in law and grand children’s lives at risk. It’s also a stain on the UK world wide.
    Second point, Harry is back for the invictus anniversary service in may, and that’s to soon in my eyes for him to even contemplate seeing this excuse of a father. Plus, I believe the only reason the king wants to see him, is to try and grab invictus for Billy

    • Beverley says:

      But Mary, can they really just snatch IG from Harry? Isn’t there a Board of Directors who would have some say? I’ve seen a few comments about Billy wanting to take IG for himself and I just don’t understand how this could happen.

      • Eurydice says:

        The IG Foundation is a separate charity. I don’t see how William can take it over unless the trustees vote for it – and why would they do that?

  15. Hanna says:

    I hope Harry won’t go unless they give him full security and a place to stay

  16. Faye says:

    He doesn’t need to stay on any of their properties and it’s best if he doesn’t. I doubt he wants them making up lies and gossip if he were under their roof.

  17. Feebee says:

    They just love talking like they know something when they don’t. The stupid takes on if they don’t do A or B it shows they’re horrible people etc. It’s relentless.

    In my book, when it’s almost April then May is “fairly soon” so a visit when he’s over for the Invictus service sounds practical. Of course this is what they do, predict something that’s connected to something already announced and then use that to say “hey I was right”.

  18. Sue says:

    For all they know Harry has been back and forth to England to visit his father. Unless Charles tells the press how would they even know? We’ve seen time and again that the great British media (hah) usually come racing in with sightings of Harry AFTER the fact. No one in the Sussex circle is telling them anything.

    • Tessa says:

      Harry has a wife now and two children. His father took their UK home away. I doubt he us visiting his father a lot.

      • Sue says:

        I agree it’s unlikely but the BM has no idea what Harry does. Even if Harry isn’t visiting personally there could be phone calls, zoom sessions etc that the media will never know about unless, like I said, Charles tells them. They sure won’t be getting any info from the Sussex camp.