Duchess Meghan’s ‘conspicuous absence’ from the UK has been ‘noted’ by the palace

To recap, Prince Harry will fly into England this week and he will attend Wednesday’s anniversary service for Invictus. The Duchess of Sussex is not coming with him to the service or to England. Meghan will fly out of the US later in the week to meet up with Harry in Nigeria, at the invitation of the Nigerian government and Nigeria’s Ministry of Defense. The British media is extremely salty about Meghan’s refusal to come back to them so they can abuse her. The British media and the Windsors are very mad that every time Meghan publicly snubs them, they look like abusive jackasses on the world stage. Thus, there’s been an effort to rewrite Meghan’s motives for why she’s choosing not to play their ridiculous games. We saw this last year, around the coronation, which Meghan made a point of snubbing. Now the Express has gotten quotes from “a senior aide” at Buckingham Palace who thinks Meghan’s “conspicuous absence” on this trip is a missed opportunity to “support her father-in-law.” Curious.

Meghan Markle will snub the UK as sources say she is “done” with the country because she “doesn’t want the drama” of dealing with the Royal Family.

Prince Harry will fly alone to the UK to attend a Wednesday afternoon service at St. Paul’s Cathedral to mark the tenth anniversary of his Invictus Games before privately meeting King Charles afterwards. The Duchess of Sussex will, however, jet out of LA the following day to join Harry in Nigeria for talks with leaders of the West African nation about hosting future Invictus events for injured military personnel. The couple’s spokesman confirmed she will not accompany her husband to St. Paul’s and will completely bypass the London leg of his trip, staying home with their children following a planned fifth birthday party on Monday for Prince Archie.

But her snub comes after sources close to the Duchess have previously been quoted as saying she is “done” with the UK and “doesn’t want the drama” of having to deal with the Royal Family.

Buckingham Palace has declined to formally comment about Harry’s visit but one senior aide observed: “Her conspicuous absence from all his recent trips has been noted. This time she will be missing a key event in Harry’s Invictus diary as well as the opportunity to offer support to her father-in-law.”

Meghan, 42, is also preparing for the imminent launch of her new lifestyle brand American Riviera Orchard with a planned media blitz that is likely to include a string of “soft” interviews on daytime TV chat shows.

But the aide added: “It strikes me as odd that she doesn’t have time to come to England where, however she feels about them, she does have family. But she does have time to join Harry in Africa. I think that speaks volumes.”

[From The Daily Express]

Here’s the thing: they’re trying to publicly guilt-trip Meghan – “why would you miss such an important event for your husband” – while at the same time, they’re drawing attention to their history of abusing this poor woman. Do they know they’re doing that? Do they know that people are like “why would Meghan not return for the Invictus service, oh I know why, it’s because Harry’s dogsh-t family treated her like sh-t and it’s not safe for her and the press would attack her for weeks no matter what.”

“As well as the opportunity to offer support to her father-in-law…” plus “she doesn’t have time to come to England where, however she feels about them, she does have family.” A father-in-law who had concerns about her children’s skin color, a father-in-law who evicted her children from their family home in the UK, a father-in-law who banned her from coming to Scotland to support her husband then bragged about it in the press, a father-in-law who offered zero support to her during the most difficult phase of her life? That’s the dogsh-t father-in-law she’s supposed to support? Clearly, Meghan does NOT believe she has any “family” in the UK.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

117 Responses to “Duchess Meghan’s ‘conspicuous absence’ from the UK has been ‘noted’ by the palace”

  1. equality says:

    Oh good. Now let’s count up all the times KC “missed an opportunity” to support Meghan.

    • truthSF says:

      Exactly!!!😤

    • SIde Eye says:

      Exactly! Just a few that come to mind:

      Silence from him when his unborn grandchild is compared to a chimp

      Silence from him when “straight outta Compton” headlines came out

      Silence from him when an attempt was made on their lives in NYC

      Silence when a false narrative was put out that Meghan made her SIL cry

      Silence when Jeremy wrote a racist, violent, sadistic and disturbing column about her

      Oh and then there was that time he pulled their security knowing very well what would have happened had Tyler Perry not stepped in.

      • Ocean Girl says:

        Nice list! Keep going–they clearly need help understanding this.

      • WiththeAmerican says:

        And not only silence, but his wife was spotted laughing and lunching and drinking with some of the authors of these vile pieces after and before they were published, basically sanctioning them in the public’s mind.

        Perhaps even the source.

      • Proud Mary says:

        Thank you! And BTW, have Charles apologized to Meghan yet? Wasn’t that a part of Harry’s requirement?

      • aftershocks says:

        Charles told his ‘darling boy’ Harry that his DIL and Harry’s dear wife, Meghan, was “not wanted at Balmoral” [to support Harry and to pay her respects to QE-II] because “she’s not family.” Periodt! End of! 🫷🏽

      • Mrs.Krabapple says:

        I also recall ZERO sympathy expressed when it came out that Meghan had a miscarriage. And ZERO sympathy expressed when it was revealed that all the cr@p they threw at her made Meghan have suicidal ideation. And ZERO acknowledgment when a retired security chief said the Sussexes faced “very real, very disgusting threats” from white supremacists. But it’s Meghan who is snubbing Charles?

      • Debbie says:

        I don’t know about any of you guys but I’m actually okay with Meghan snubbing the hell out of them. She’s entitled, after all they’ve put her through. And, not for nothin’ (as they say in New York) but if I looked as great in a funeral hat, I’d got to aaall the funerals.

    • Lulu says:

      Chuck is too busy to attend the IG service, and these same folks are posting daily that Meghan is filming her cooking show? Yes , of course she is too busy to visit Chuck.

      • Christine says:

        Charles became patron of the Royal British Legion last week. Isn’t that the organization that is in charge of the U.K. Invictus team?

        Probably should have held off on that press release.

      • windyriver says:

        Thanks for the head’s up, looks like it was just announced a couple of days ago.

        The RBL is a major organization. QEII was their patron her entire reign. Shouldn’t have taken Charles all this time to decide he’d grace them with his presence. And yes, the RBL has been in charge of selecting and training the UK IG team the last couple of games. And, Charles didn’t need to be the patron to have publicly wished the team well in Dusseldorf last year – but we heard nary a peep from the CIC. Chuck the Turd indeed.

        I’m sure it’s no coincidence this is being announced just before the IG service.

      • Christine says:

        I’m thinking they should have waited, since it will look bad if he isn’t there.

    • Lau says:

      In these people’s minds the fact that he walked her down the aisle means that she has a lifetime debt to KC.

    • StillDouchesOfCambridge says:

      I thought they noted her departure in March 2020

    • JJ says:

      Didn’t KC make a big deal about Meghan not being allowed at Balmoral after the queen died? And then, wasn’t he absent when Harry arrived at Balmoral to see his grandmother? And wasn’t it KC who couldn’t even make an hour for Harry when he flew halfway across the world to see him? KC is getting the attention or lack thereof he deserves from H&M.

      • Gabby says:

        He also put immense pressure on her regarding her own father’s media trainwreck. Tried to tell her how she should handle Toxic Tom’s betrayal. Not out of any concern for Meghan’s well-being, but simply to save face for the Windsors. F Chuckles. May all his remaining days be filled with gloom and regret.

    • westcoastgal says:

      FFS, how can you snub something or someone who rejected you and chased you away? They were evicted from their home, security was removed and they were treated like trash and they expect her to want to return for more abuse? Either the palace is filled with absolute idiots or they enjoy playing stupid for the whole world to see.

    • ales says:

      The invisible cowards who release statements on behalf of the BRF, make everyone in the family out to be inhumane monsters. Recently someone said that they were treating Meghan like a runaway slave, not the accomplished person that she is, let us see some photos of the cowards. Too vile to show themselves in public or too self important to take ownership of their destructive statements. Youtube channel for BRF staff making all the statements, it would be perfect. They all claim to be telling the truth, why are they hiding ?? There could be live interviews of them feeding the royal rota. No need for privacy.

    • Princessk says:

      Will anyone be going to St Paul’s Cathedral to support Harry?
      I am going to go.

  2. Just why should she support him after all the crap he and his incandescent rage monster heir and the gutter press bedmates have put her through? He has taken away security from her husband and she doesn’t feel safe there. This is their fault not hers.

  3. Hypocrisy says:

    The “Her conspicuous absence from all his recent trips has been noted.“ sure comes across as a threat.. seriously who is “noting” her attendance and why exactly? Truthfully I hope she never returns there for her own peace and safety.

    • Chloe says:

      They also forget 1 important thing: Harry made it very clear his wife and children wouldn’t step foot in the UK unless proper security was in place. The ball is quite literally in the UK’s (government) court.

      • Oh come on. says:

        Right? The BRF have fought hard not to provide security for Meghan and Harry and their kids. Then act surprised when she won’t visit 👀

      • Sheila Senescall says:

        They should not take the children to the Uk. DON’T DO IT MEGHAN. If Charles is sooo anxious to see his grandchildren and misses them so much then he can get his butt on a plane and come to the US because it’s very clear that Harry will not have proper security for his family in the UK !

    • GoodWitchGlenda says:

      It certainly does sound like an attempt at a threat – luckily, they have nothing they can take from her or do to her at this point, aside from remove her and Harry’s titles, which wouldn’t matter one bit. Harry and Meghan Mountbatten (sp?) Windsor would still run circles around them.

      • Lawrenceville says:

        Nope, it would be Prince Henry and Princess Henry. Harry’s prince title can’t be taken away from him. If they yank Duke, he reverts back to bring just Prince Harry and Meghan will automatically become Princess Henry.

      • B says:

        If they tried that, it would be hysterical if Harry became Harry Markle.

        The woman has multiple options and she will pick the best one for her and her family. Oh well.

    • KeKe Swan says:

      LOL. Is it going on her **permanent record**?

  4. Brassy Rebel says:

    Clearly, she prefers Nigeria to the UK. Who can blame her? And she has real “family” there!

  5. Whyforthelove says:

    They were just her degree family…

  6. Oh come on. says:

    They can feel however they want about it: Meghan is not coming back to absorb their abuse, ever again.

    If they want to reflect on why that might be, they might learn something.

    More likely, the BM and BRF can just keep crying as if they’re the wronged party here.

  7. Jais says:

    I mean yeah. What family does she have in the UK? The Spencers and we know they’ve actually gone to Cali for visits. Besides that, again, what family? Eugenie and Jack and we know they’ve visited with them in both Cali and Portugal. So again, what family? It ain’t Charles or William or Kate. She very specifically referred to them as her husband’s family.

    • WiththeAmerican says:

      Wish someone could love fact-check this fool: “it’s also noted that this family you speak of withdrew security for the whole Sussex family and won’t allow coordinating security with the experts in the U.K. I don’t know about your family, but my family would never endanger my spouse and my children like that.”

  8. EasternViolet says:

    King Charles refuses to protect Meghan and Harry while in the UK. Duly noted.

  9. Brit says:

    Somebody has been badgering the communications team about why Meghan hasn’t returned because a certain press wants glimpses of her and the children. The problem with the press is that they can’t rewrite history when there is a book and documentary from the Sussexes. We all know Charles could care less about Meghan. The press want her back badly and her not coming is scaring them because she’s their money maker.

  10. Eurydice says:

    The poor, poor royal victims. But you can’t fight 1,000 years of narcissism. It’s not about Meghan’s feelings for the RF, it’s about the RF’s feelings about her.

    • Agnes says:

      Half of her birth family inoculated her against the pure venom of the BRF’s institutionalized narcissism, so I guess they were good for *something.* One reason M has such a big following is because so many of us have experienced the pain of poisonous “family,” and know the only option is to GTFO, and cut off all contact. Nigeria will treat her respectfully, unlike Britain.

      • Christine says:

        Seriously, the Markles were her training wheels for what it’s like to be related to malignant narcissists.

  11. s808 says:

    “It strikes me as odd that she doesn’t have time to come to England where, however she feels about them, she does have family”

    She does not have family in them. They do not consider her family. She’s right to consider them “her husband’s family” because that’s what they are. End of. The press can write whatever they want but she’s not stepping in a toe in the country for the foreseeable future, if ever, they can help it. The press played their part in making this happen so they need to get over it.

    • MrsCope says:

      Agreed. When the queen was dying, Meghan was not allowed to come to Balmoral. The reason given? Only FAMILY is invited to be there. So no, she doesn’t have family there.

    • SussexWatcher says:

      Exactly, S808. How many times and in how many ways have they told her she’s NOT family and she doesn’t belong and isn’t welcome. The “family” members themselves told her over and over again – directly (not welcome in Scotland to support her husband after the queen’s death, numerous messages sent from the Wailses) and indirectly (Camzilla sending her henchmen out to publish violent, racist screeds against Meghan, literally everyone in the “family” abusing her to/via the press). Not to mention the press othering her from the second she was introduced as Harry’s girlfriend.

      Welp, she heard you all loud and clear. You’ve told her she’s not welcome and don’t ever come back and she said, byyyeeeee, no problem at all.

    • Proud Mary says:

      Given how that family (including Kate) has treated her, Meghan has more family in Nigeria than she does in Britain. I hope she understands just how well-played this is. Keep away baby girl, you’re doing just great!

  12. Amy Bee says:

    What family does Meghan have in the UK? Charles said she wasn’t family.

    • Christine says:

      They’re just pissed because she’s not desperately trying to get into their good graces. She should really want them to want her, why doesn’t she know that?!?!

      • lucy2 says:

        Agreed. They’re so used to people doing anything possible to get in the inner circle, they can’t understand that she (and Harry) were like LOL no bye.

  13. nutella toast says:

    Harry in U.K. and gets 1/2 hour after flying 23 hours. Meghan isn’t making the time??? Really? Accusations are confessions.

  14. Maxine Branch says:

    Meghan is protecting her peace she has recaptured by moving back to California. It is this simple.

  15. Lady Digby says:

    If Charles wanted to see Meghan and his grandchildren then he shouldnt have evicted them from Frogmore Cottage! If he’s desperate to make amends then when he last saw Harry he could have asked to see the entire family and insist they stay with him and enjoy full security and protection..

  16. Becks1 says:

    She has zero obligation to do anything to “support” Charles or the rest of the royals. They never once supported her, so why does she owe them anything? She doesn’t. If she doesn’t want to go to the UK, she doesn’t have to, and the british press is just going to have to come to grips with that.

    • Eurydice says:

      But, but, but he’s the King! She should be willing to crawl over broken glass, wearing sack cloth and ashes, just for the honor of basking in his glorious presence.

  17. Moniquep says:

    Kaiser, yes, yes, yes to the millionth power, to everything in your last paragraph. The turd of a FIL who has made it very clear that he doesn’t give a flying fig about her, but she should put herself out to support him. Really!!

    • Chrissy says:

      The fact that he hasn’t even acknowledged his Sussex grandchildren or made any effort to even refer to them, never mind meet and get to know them, must stick in Meghan’s craw as well. Chuck is trash, and he caused this schism all on his own by saying and doing nothing to support his younger son’s family!

  18. OriginalMich says:

    Oh. Sure. I’d also be rushing to return to a country/family that proudly proclaimed I should be paraded through the streets like Cersei while having excrement thrown at me.

  19. Cj says:

    “She does have time to join Harry in Africa. I think that speaks volumes.”

    Yes. It suggests she feels safe and welcome to visit a new country in a way that she does not feel about the U.K. and its colonisers. That she knows a Black Country who have celebrated her history and linkage to them will be a nicer place to be than a country and a FAMILY that disparaged her blackness and then pretended it was never about that.

    So yeah. It speaks volumes about the U.K. in a way they shouldn’t like, but in which too many people here will be proud of. Ugh.

  20. JCallas says:

    Why isn’t Charles supporting the Invictus service?

  21. Aimee says:

    How can she support her father in law if he won’t give the time of day to his own son?

  22. Just Jade says:

    That picture of Meghan breaks my heart.
    We have to go back six years of him not supporting his daughter in law. Didn’t he say Meghan was not family?

    • Debbie says:

      I know what you mean about that photo. She looked diffident, unsure, and very vulnerable with the handwringing and her facial expression; whereas, from the first time she started doing events with Harry she seemed confident, smiling, and sure of her place and her reason for being at those prior events.

  23. amy says:

    They’re complaining that she doesn’t have time to go to London for this event, but the working royals LIVE IN LONDON and they aren’t going to the event. So.

    • MsIam says:

      I guess those “gold standard advisors” at the palace are too dumb to see the irony in that. But it’s all about them you see, the sun revolves around the king.

  24. Paula Ziegler says:

    She had a birthday party for her 1 year old daughter and none of them showed up. If it were me I would never forgive that.

    • Jais says:

      Right? I still think Charles has never actually met lilibet. Sources said they met briefly but I don’t know if I believe it.

      • MsIam says:

        Harry didn’t mention it in Spare, so I too think Charles didn’t bother to show up.

    • Laura D says:

      @Paula Ziegler – ITA.

      I’d go even further and say. I could possibly forgive them for not turning up to the party (it was the Jubbly) BUT to gloat about it to their attack dogs in the MSM was disgraceful. Even now as I’m typing I can feel my blood boiling. That little girl has done nothing wrong. I understand they’ve had a falling out with Harry and Meghan but, to drag Lili into it was shameful. If I were Meghan (and someone had tried to use my daughter that way) I honestly wouldn’t bother crossing the road to spit on them, let alone turn up to offer my “support” for the cameras.

  25. Latine says:

    They don’t have anything to talk about! Its dry in British gossip. They fallback on elizzy, philip, Andrew, Fergie, and Harry. It seems Philip really was the driving force of Being Active. You can actually tell when he started getting ill. The events started getting safer.

    Well it’s obvious they wanted Harry to be the new Andrew. Harry was suppose yo be a beggar prince. Only difference is Andrew kept most of his money while William wanted most of Harry’s.

  26. lucy2 says:

    I am so tired of seeing this story from the media. They drove this woman and her family out of the UK, and then have spent the past few years whining “she’s not coming back, she’s terrible for not coming back!” Just leave her alone.

  27. MsIam says:

    When Meghan didn’t go to the coronation, “sources” said ALL of the Windsors “breathed a sigh of relief” that she didn’t come. And didn’t W&K say in December2023 that they would rather be around a “bucket of sick” than be around the Sussexes? Does the press suddenly have amnesia and forget all of that stuff THEY printed from THEIR sources? And now they have the gall to wonder why Meghan won’t come to the UK. They should be glad that Harry visited his father and that Kate got public well-wishes from the Sussexes because that’s way more than the Left-behinds deserve.

    • Debbie says:

      I read that more as talk from a bitter ex. Like, just after you tell them you’re leaving and don’t want to be with them; they try to pretend that the rejection really came from their side. So, they say things like, “I never wanted you in the first place. You’re not leaving me, I’m leaving you.” In the case of the BRF it’s like, “Oh, you’re not coming? Well, I didn’t want you there in the first place. I’m so relieved you’re not coming (AFTER you show & tell them you are just not into them.)” Then, they spend years bemoaning the fact that you never call and never visit. So transparent.

  28. North of Boston says:

    This is SO bizarre!

    Like:

    Person A resigned from Firm X 4 years ago

    Firm X Spokesperson: “Person A’s absence from Firm X’s HQ and all company events has been noted!”

    And?

    Dear Firm: she doesnt work for you, KCIii is no longer her boss or Supreme Leader. She doesn’t have to come to the picnic or stop by to punch in and show her face. Because … wait for it …
    …she doesn’t work (or live) there anymore!

  29. windyriver says:

    Have they also noted that – excluding the funerals for his grandparents – Harry himself has spent maybe a total of 10 days in the UK since leaving in March 2020?

    This coming week marks the fourth anniversary of the day the grandson of the British queen, and his family, had to leave their besieged home in Canada in the middle of the night, helped ONLY because of a compassionate person they’d never met, because the “family” Meghan has in the UK not only wouldn’t provide help, but had placed them in danger in the first place. The “palace” should feel humiliated and ashamed over that, but clearly don’t. Just because the RF think they’re safely cocooned from any consequences in their royal bubble, doesn’t mean millions of people worldwide didn’t see clearly how ludicrous it was for Harry, son of the future king, to be in such a situation (with his family), and exactly who to hold responsible.

    Hopefully, IG will skip the UK as a location for 2027. Once the lawsuits are over, not much reason for Harry to come back to visit either. The BM and RF should get used to it now.

    • ElleE says:

      @Windyriver
      They didn’t move in May 2020,
      they left Canada on March 24, 2020, about 2 weeks after the March 9 Commonwealth Service.

      Someone shared security camera footage of them doing food drops off in LA for people isolating due to Covid in April, 2020, which I think was the 1st time it dawned that they left Canada.

    • windyriver says:

      Hi @ElleE – double check what I wrote above. I didn’t say May, I did say March.

      Also, they left Canada on March 14, not March 24; Harry says so at the beginning of Episode 6 of the documentary. That’s pretty amazing considering Meghan left the UK on March 9, right after the CS – but Harry didn’t. He left at least a day later. And yet, within just a few more days, they and the rest of the family had gotten everything together and got the heck out of Canada, because they knew the borders would be closing.

      You’re right about the LA food drop articles, I remember the footage and that appears to be mid-April according to an old CNN article. Wonder if the BM didn’t know at that point where they were staying; as per Harry, it wasn’t until the day after Archie’s birthday that the DM publicized they were at Tyler Perry’s house.

  30. paintybox says:

    In a set of punishing moves KC took away their money, their security and their home, which was a so-called gift from the queen even though they paid a fortune to remodel it themselves and paid rent for it. KC and that “family” sat in silence while various friends of the current queen published things like Meghan should be stripped and made to run the gauntlet while people throw excrement at her. She knows where this is all coming from and that Harry’s family are not innocent bystanders. When people intentionally want to subject you (and your children!) to danger and global humiliation, they definitely are not visiting material. Stay far, far away.

  31. Jay says:

    A father-in-law that pulled security after leaking their location and ordering media goons to put a target on their backs in order to “destroy” them. Lol at supporting THAT father-in-law.

  32. Lulu says:

    Sweet if Meghan’s team said, ‘ The Duchess of Sussex would be happy to meet with her in-laws at the IG service.’ LOL. I know it’s better for her to not get pulled into responding but still it would be great.

  33. Chelsea says:

    When the Queen died palace aides rushed to the the British press to let them know that Meghan had been BANNED from Balmoral because she was NOT family and they were furious at her for thinking she was(despite the fact that Sophia went up there). This story was the headline on the Daily Mail’s front page before Betty’s body was even cold so please spare me this BS about how Meghan’s got family in the UK and she should visit her father in law when we know from Spare that it was that dog s*** father in law who not only banned her from supporting her grieving husband but used language so disgusting when talking about her that Harry tell him not to speak about his wife that way.

    I always figured that when Betty died Meghan would disengage more from that island and family because she cared for that old lady for some reason but I think the horrific way she was treated by that family and their disgusting press in the weeks after Betty’s death made her completely disengage and I’m happy for her that she’s set this boundary and moved on with her life. It is not healthy to force yourself to be around people who get off on abusing you and want your destruction. She really is the Patron Saint of Go Where You Are Respected Not Barely Tolerated and i hope others learn from her.

  34. QuiteContrary says:

    That fact that she’s going to Nigeria but not England — well, I couldn’t love it more.

    It is the treatment the left-behind royals earned (the only thing they’ve ever actually earned, really).

  35. Mel says:

    At this point, the best thing to do is ignore the willful delusion. What is she supposed to do, come over and change Chuckles chamber pots? These people are ridiculous.

  36. B says:

    I’m sure her absence has been noted by the palace since history has shown that Meghan and the kids don’t come to the UK unless they are given adequate security. They are blocking her while pretending she’s the bad guy for “snubbing” people.

    It doesn’t work because they’ve been so publicly awful to her so instead of looking bad everyone says I’d do the same but Lord knows they keep trying.

    • Mel says:

      Honestly, I think they could have her surrounded by M16 for security and I think she still wouldn’t go back. The family is toxic AF, I think she’s over subjecting herself or her children to them. If you notice, every time Harry goes, he has his “hanger in hand” so he can hang up his suit jacket and get back on a plane. He doesn’t stay but they don’t want to talk about that and the WHY.

  37. Anna says:

    I don’t read Meghan’s mind but the only one person that she would support is Harry. If I were her, I would probably say: I have zero intention to go, unless you need me to go for your support. And I get the feeling Harry is maybe keeping this option for Chucks funeral. Otherwise Meg stays, he flies in and out as fast as he can.

    Also – she has two small children who need a parent. To leave them, she probably needs a good reason and supporting people who wish she doesn’t exists might not be one of them.

  38. Vanessa says:

    How many headlines have the British tabloids Screamed over and over that Meghan is not welcomed or wanted not only by the royal family but the British public. But the moment she is being asked and welcome with open arms to another country all sudden the British tabloids and Royal family started to scream what about us don’t you want to see us too . The fact that Meghan has walk away for them she and Harry have been successful thriving happy bothers them Meghan and Harry have withstand all that the mudsling and lies . While the others left over Royals are struggling .

  39. sparrow says:

    She can’t do right for doing wrong. If she came, the narrative would be: Meghan “lives it up” at Invictus while her sister in law struggles on with her illness. blah blah blah. For her own sanity and safety, it’s better she stays away. And I say that as someone who’d like to see her back here.

    • Christine says:

      They would just start the process of wailing all over again that Meghan makes everything about herself. It’s such a boring cycle with these people.

    • rosa mwemaid says:

      I agree. I would love to see her come her and get the warm welcome she deserves.

  40. matthewburnet17 says:

    Why is it anybody talking about the real reason? Meghan Markle is not supporting her husband this week. The real reason is they are not providing them with security. Husband does not feel that they are providing them with security. They both said it because they do not feel safe and they will not visit open the family to that toxic British island until the app provided with adequate security. This is not gossip on the court document it.

  41. Jennifer says:

    Is anyone noting the conspicuous absence of a safe, comfortable place (like, I don’t know, Frogmore…) for Meghan and Harry to stay?

  42. GDubslady says:

    It would be nice if Charles or William said Meghan is a lovely person, good, hard working and kind but it’s an experiment that didn’t work. Then add the Sussexes especially Meghan deserve autonomy and happiness. That’s the truth. Just admit she didn’t fit and the family weren’t comfortable. They all tried. Doesn’t make any of us bad people. Do this instead of continuously choosing to demonize the Sussexes. That’s what makes them racists.

    • NikkiK says:

      Exactly! It would be huge coming from William or Charles to just be like “move on”. They aren’t working Royals and there’s some estrangement but we wish them the best.

      Besides the UK press needs to be concerned with the supposed working royal who is apparently so ill she hasn’t been seen in public for almost 6 months. That’s the real story.

    • Maxine Branch says:

      How would that be nice? Racism and a sterling work ethic with results put Harry’s birth family to shame. An experiment? How about a marriage to someone above their station with regards to being fully functional and engaging with empathy to spare. The gravitational pull Meghan had on engagements was something to write home about. Diversity is the problem with Harry’s birth family, they obviously do not like people of color. This is what they should admit.

      • rosa mwemaid says:

        It always has been racism and not only the RF but the media as well. the society of editors have accepted that their coverage is racist.

    • CatMum says:

      No, racism is what makes them racist. This is just how they’re expressing it right now.

  43. Saucy&Sassy says:

    It took me a minute, but I think I get it. They want her to go with Harry to the UK so they can snub her.

    • Dee says:

      They want to make money off of her images and then write countless articles about her body language, about some imaginary breach of protocol, remind us of them many bathrooms in the Montecito mansion, criticize her for leaving the children and wring out every penny they can.

  44. Saucy&Sassy says:

    “The Duchess of Sussex will, however, jet out of LA the following day to join Harry in Nigeria ” Well, well, well. Has someone been doing some blagging?

  45. Normandes says:

    The father in law that evicted them from their home and doesn’t see his grandchildren.

  46. Over it says:

    But how can that woman be family ? Meghan is the same that woman that was not family enough for balmoral when Betty died. She is the same that woman that was thrown out of the house she paid for. She is the same that woman that when her son was called a monkey and British journalist wanted to dangle him off a balcony, Charles the dog shit said nothing. Meghan is the same that woman whose daughter was attacked because she was named after the queen nickname. It was good enough for a horse, but not that woman daughter. So the palace should note that we too take note of all the horrible, dehumanizing, disgusting,
    Racist, abusive things that those people have done to Meghan. Family does not do these things to you . So therefore you ain’t her family. That woman. Meghan the queen that she is . Is over your crusty salty asses. Deal with it

    • B says:

      I like your summary.

      Also- didn’t care to ask how she was doing after she had the baby.

    • Tessa says:

      Charles also talks of beloved Kate like a daughter to him . Kate the one that let a lie about Meghan stay in the media and was openly hostile to meghan.

  47. rosa mwemaid says:

    Last week and many times before the DE has told its readers that the King doesn’t want to see Meghan, I think they rely on all their readers having dementia so they don’t remember what they read last week. Some days you will see two or more leads on the same page contradicting each other.

  48. Beana says:

    As my therapist always said, “When your family is toxic and hurts you, they stop being family – they’re just your relatives.” Outside of Meghan’s Spencer family, I don’t blame her for declining to visit those crappy Windsor relatives.

  49. MelodyM says:

    Meghan does have family in the Uk: The Spencers. But they know how to buy a ticket on a trans-atlantic flight to CA and visit Harry, Meghan and the children in their home.

    • PotatoPuff says:

      Yes, ma’am!!!!

      How great would it be if Meghan wore the Spencer tiara to some future black tie event? Full circle, baby, given what we now know from Spare.

      • Lucky Charm says:

        I’ve been wishing that for years now! It would also have the added benefit of imploding the empty heads at BP & KP if she was able to borrow that tiara for an evening!

  50. JudyB says:

    Ignoring whether or not she has family in the UK, the tone of this sounds like a threat–sort of like you would tell a child that you are watching him or her and keeping track of what that person is doing. You know, keeping a list of bad behavior so you can punish that person? At least that is what I get out of the article putting “noted” in quotation marks. Ditto for calling this a “conspicuous absence.”

    And this constant talk of who is snubbing who is getting more than a bit tiresome.

    The whole thing sounds as if Meghan is disobeying orders of some sort, or doing something that might result in something bad happening to her. Is insinuating a threat the purpose of this article???

  51. Lucky Charm says:

    King Charles’s conspicuous absence from Montecito has been noted by the Sussexes. Why couldn’t he attend Princess Lilibet’s christening last year, again?

  52. bisynaptic says:

    These people are out of their ever-loving minds.
    Also: making IG about Charles—even though he won’t be there. 🙄

  53. JFerber says:

    Okay, it has to be said: Fuck the palace. Note that.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment