DM: Prince George & Charlotte will break the spare cycle because Charlotte is a girl

In 2023, I pointed out that the entire royal-media apparatus decided that Prince Harry’s Spare was “actually a story about how Harry is mad because he was always in William’s shadow.” Instead of delving into the actual story of neglect, grief, mental health, physical abuse and dealing with his family’s constant jealousy, royal reporters decided that Harry was always mad that he wasn’t the heir! Given that the left-behinds always insisted that they never read Spare, I can only assume that this false summary of Harry’s message was provided by courtiers to the Windsors as well. It would explain some of the palace messaging about the Wales children too.

Over the summer, we heard yet again that the Prince and Princess of Wales want to “break the spare cycle” with their children. An implicit admission that the heir/spare dynamic is inherently dysfunctional and that perhaps Harry was right to walk away and start a new life, perhaps? Of course not. William and Kate don’t actually want to break any cycle which benefits them. Hilariously, there’s a new reason why the Wales kids will “break the spare cycle” though – it’s because Charlotte is a girl, you see.

The Prince and Princess of Wales’s children will break the cycle of heir and spare sibling rivalry thanks to a more ‘normal childhood’ and modernised line of succession, royal experts have claimed.

William’s daughter and sons are less likely to suffer the same bitter ‘rift’ he and his brother, the Duke of Sussex, fell to as a result of changes made to 21st century monarchy, insiders speaking in a new Channel 5 documentary have shared. Some believe that this, in part, will be due to the end of a centuries-old primogeniture tradition, which ended in 2013, previously dictating that the first born son would take the throne, and that any resulting spare must be succeeded by the next born male.

‘For the first time in British history, the spare is a princess, even though she has a younger brother,’ Dr Nige Fletcher, a political and contemporary historian, explained. ‘Princess Charlotte is in line after George, after a change in the law, and she now outranks her brother, Louis.’

Ten-year-old Charlotte, will be the first to benefit from the long-needed update, which previously sidelined Princess Anne and made Prince Andrew the spare to Charles. This will also open the door to more harmonious relations between siblings, according to Tom Quinn, historian and author of Scandals of the Royal Palaces.

‘It will make things a lot easier because there won’t be two males like two deer clashing antlers anymore,’ he remarked.

Speaking in the documentary, others suggested that the future will be different for the youngest successors because they are being raised as equals and have a more ‘normal’ upbringing – a ‘key to unpacking and shifting expectations of our heirs and spares’. Ailsa Anderson, former press secretary to Queen Elizabeth II also said they would have more ‘freedom and choice than their father had’.

[From The Daily Mail]

Again, what came between William and Harry wasn’t “sibling rivalry,” nor is Harry “angry” with William because William is the heir. This is quite an admission too: “they would have more ‘freedom and choice than their father had’.” So… Harry was supposed to never seek freedom from the institution because he was ALWAYS supposed to support William and be William’s wingman and be William’s designated scapegoat and do whatever William ordered. All because William never had freedom, but his children will have freedom to do whatever they want! All of the stuff about the spare dynamic not existing because Charlotte is a girl is bizarre as well. Brothers and sisters can have sibling rivalries too.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Backgrid, Cover Images.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

30 Responses to “DM: Prince George & Charlotte will break the spare cycle because Charlotte is a girl”

  1. Lover says:

    Ah yes, female spares have it better. Just ask Margaret!

    • Lauren says:

      To be fair, Anne was the spare for a while and she’s definitely faired better.

      I’ve always felt that Charlotte being a girl would keep her from being too much of a scapegoat. The press and the palace are going to want to play her up as Diana’s heir.

      It’s Louis who they’ll consider the scapegoat. He’s an extra boy, so they can use him to make his brother look good. They’re already starting with it, making him the mischevious one to George’s seriousness.

      • DK says:

        But Anne faired better in no small part because she:
        1) eschewed some of the royal BS (refusing titles for her children, etc.); and
        2) STILL does more royal work than anyone else.

        In other words, my hot take is that Anne’s “doing better” is precisely because she was willing to do more work for less royal shine.

        Still sounds like the short end of the spare stick to me…

        Also, ignoring the fact that Harry was the only male 2nd child spare in the last 3 generations, so Charlotte being a girl is hardly revolutionary, all this updated primogeniture law means is that now the 2nd born, regardless of gender, is the next-in-line-spare. So…how does that change things? It just means she is in the exact same role as Harry was.

        Until they really understand what Harry was talking about in Spare, they will not fix the problems of the heir/spare dynamic.
        So, sorry Charlotte – looks like you’re stuck no matter what, since they refuse to learn from or listen to H.

        (But yes, I also agree, the press is already locking Louis into the scapegoat role of spare, so she’ll be safe in some ways, and the heir/spare terror dynamics will continue with L instead)

      • Plums says:

        Anne was only the spare when she was a small child, and then Andrew became the spare because the primogeniture laws favoring younger brothers over older sisters didn’t change until Kate was first pregnant. Her life very well may have been messier if that wasn’t the case. I mean, look at Andrew.

      • lanne says:

        Anne was spared because she conformed to every upper class convention expected of her–she was pretty in an upperclass horsey way. She loves horses and country pursuits. She’s not particularly intelligent or charismatic in a way that could challenge her brother. She’s dull and dutiful. Charlotte will be acceptable ONLY if she is Anne 2.0–pretty, but not too pretty. Not too smart. Not too outspoken. Not too charismatic. Thin. Likes horses and country stuff. If she deviates one iota from this, the media will make her life hell. The media thinks they own the royal children, and that they have a legitimate say in how those children are raised, how they’re dressed, what activities they pursue. I hate that for them. I also have my doubts that their parents will protect them from those serious boundary stompers. The Wales seem determined to continue the generational trauma instead of trying to stop it.

      • Lawrenceville says:

        @Lauren, first of all, as others already stated above, Ann was a spare for just her childhood, before her brother was born. So, Ann having it easy is like Charlotte (or Margaret) having it easy NOW (caps for emphasis only), as a child(ren). So, in this regard, Ann can’t be used as a yard stick.
        Secondly, Ann is the poster child of upper-class female conformity I have ever read about. She accepted and conformed to every single expectation of her and her offspring, no questions asked. Even if she had accepted titles for her children, her children would still have had it easy because they all were raised to conform to the royal norms and never ever challenge anything, just stay in your lane and do as you are told. Consider the York and Wessex children, all titled but never challenge anything, so the media pretty much leaves them alone, they all do as they’re told and stay out of the way.
        Charlotte will only have it easy if she lives her life just like Ann, stay in your lane, don’t challenge the system, don’t ask questions, do as you are told. Any attempts to be Prince Harry’s version of the spare will not be tolerated in any way, shape or form. And Charlotte is being raised to conform to the system’s norms and not to challenge nor ask anything, period. The UK media will want and expect Margaret out of Charlotte, end of. Now, whether Charlotte, when she grows up, will be what is expected of her is yet to be determined later in her life. Let’s watch and see.

    • Yes I was gonna say Margaret didn’t fair so well.

    • Mtl.ex.pat says:

      Was just coming here to say that about Margaret!

  2. Lightpurple says:

    Princess Margaret would like a word.

  3. Hypocrisy says:

    Sadly these kids won’t break anything because their parents have played along and fed the beast that will control their lives and imagine forever now. Unless they follow Prince Harry’s lead and leave they are going to live under the control of the tabloids, that is their future they will be stuck with because WanK was to busy with their hate campaign against the Sussex’s to worry about protecting their own children’s future and making real change.

  4. Lala11_7 says:

    Insert .gif of ✨️ Viola Davis✨️ as “Annalise Keating” SHMFH as she GATHERS her 🤬 to go…

    Especially since the Royal leaders in 🇬🇧 that have been ICONIC & NOT MONSTERS😠…are ALL QUEENS (2-Elizabeths & 1-Victoria)…like the “Spare” won’t be thinking of THAT!

    • jais says:

      Perfect Annalise Keating moment. To which I say, we’ll see. I hope those kids have it better. Considering that family’s toxic relationship with the tabloids, I won’t hold my breath. But I wish it for them.

  5. M says:

    Yea Charlotte will be ignored because she’s female and Louis will become the spare. When was the last time he was allowed at an event with either parent just by himself? Never. The othering of Louis has already begun. And Charlotte will be made into a clone of her mother by the press.

  6. Neeve says:

    She may not get the male spare treatment because she is a girl but the BM will skip right past that to make sure Loius is the clown. By the time they are in their late teens their age difference wont matter,they still need their scapegoat.

  7. sunnyside up says:

    It would certainly be better if they are treated as equals, but are they? William certainly doesn’t have the same regard for woman’s football as he does for men’s. Will he take George to the final if England are playing in it, where ever it is.

    • Becks1 says:

      Right! I was coming in to say that. They are NOT treated as equals. George is the one who goes to soccer matches with William. Charlotte only got to go this summer because it was becoming too obvious that he doesn’t take her.

      the heir and spare dynamic isn;t just about personality – although that plays a role. Its more about one sibling being raised higher than the others. And we absolutely are seeing that with George.

      Harry wasn’t angry that William was the heir. Harry was angry that he was treated as if he wasn’t worth anything because he WASN’T the heir. He was angry that William and Kate lived in a London mansion with custom furniture and decor while he lived at Nott cott and Meghan used her credit card to buy them a new sofa. He was angry that he was treated as a second class citizen in the family.

  8. Normades says:

    Charlotte will not get the spare treatment because she’s already better at this than her older brother. Louis will be thrown under the bus and already has.

    • Brassy Rebel says:

      Yes, this might be another situation where the second born is more suited to be the heir as is the case with Harry. But it’s too soon to tell. It’s a very basic weakness of monarchy and primogeniture.

      • jais says:

        And that didn’t necessarily work out well for Harry in the long run. But since Charlotte will likely, although who knows, not be marrying a woman who might outshine the heir’s wife, it might go differently.

  9. SuOutdoors says:

    For ten years Princess Anne was the spare – and she is still working as her status hadn’t changed at all. Prince Andrew in comparism…

  10. Tessa says:

    Though some media people talk about Charlotte “supporting” George. which is in the same territory as Harry “supporting” William. She needs to have a life of her own instead of being
    the support to George.

  11. Tessa says:

    The children have been stereotyped. Will says George is always perfectly behaved. And Charlotte “corrects her brothers” and Louis is “cheeky”

  12. That is so! says:

    I think Charles and Anne work well together because Anne was never Charles’ spare.

    Charles and Andrew do not work well together, perhaps because Andrew was the spare. I wonder if Andrew would not be as horrid as he is if he weren’t Charles’ spare. Some of the identity/personality markers the tabloids tried to attach to Harry were similar to what they hung on Andrew (and perhaps Margaret). The rapscallion, the drunk, n’er do well, etc.

    The spare must always be damaged so that the public will never want to fantasize of the birth order being reversed.

    I don’t know if the tabloids with spare Charlotte because she is a female and put all the damage on Louis. A damaged Louis will not protect George, so perhaps not.

    • molly says:

      Charles and Anne work well because she’s never sought the spotlight in her work, appearance, words, or choices.

      She’s always been content to show up in her sensible clothes to the sensible events and act perfectly sensible. She will NEVER outshine the monarch/heir– exactly as the Royal Machine demands.

      Can Charlotte lead the same charisma-free life? Maybe. (Her mother is certainly trying!) Margaret couldn’t, Diana couldn’t, Harry couldn’t, Meghan definitely couldn’t, and their lives were made miserable because of it.

      • Betsy says:

        Anne was the spare until she was 11. And it’s well known she resented fiercely the favoritism shown to Charles.

  13. QuiteContrary says:

    This is all so bizarre and outmoded. Abolish the monarchy.

  14. Nic919 says:

    Charlotte will be dealing with the misogyny of the system as well as the media itself.

  15. Amy Bee says:

    Some derangers blame Harry leaving on Diana treating him and William as equals and they believe that Harry shouldn’t have any expectations of being treated equally because he was the spare. So how is George and Charlotte being treated as equals going to change things?

  16. Eurydice says:

    So, there won’t be any sibling rivalry because Charlotte is a girl? I don’t think that’s how it works.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment