The police ended their inquiry into Andrew Windsor’s smears against Virginia

In October, before Andrew Mountbatten Windsor “gave up” all of his titles, there was a steady stream of grotesque stories, some of the stories from Virginia Giuffre’s memoir and some from the Jeffrey Epstein files. The weekend of October 18-19, we learned that Virginia signed a one-year gag order as part of Andrew’s multi-million-dollar settlement to her in 2022, and the gag order was specifically designed to not ruin QEII’s Jubilee. Alongside that news, the Mail got their hands on years-old emails to and from Andrew in which he was passing along information about Virginia (like her Social Security number and more) to palace officials and his police protection officers with the hope that they would help him smear or harm Virginia. When she was alive, Virginia had some inkling that Andrew was digging into her backstory and trying to find anything to discredit her. She even wrote in her book that he tried to hire internet trolls to hassle her. Well, the Met Police briefly conducted an “investigation” into all of this and… the cops have now shut down the investigation. Nothing to see here, folks!

Virginia Giuffre’s family have hit out over the decision by Scotland Yard to drop its inquiries into claims that Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor tried to smear her by passing confidential information to police. They say the Metropolitan Police decided not to pursue the case without speaking to them first, The Telegraph can disclose.

In October, a leaked email revealed that Mr Mountbatten-Windsor allegedly asked his taxpayer-funded police bodyguard to investigate Ms Giuffre and passed him her date of birth and social security number. He then allegedly told Buckingham Palace aide Ed Perkins, who at the time was Elizabeth II’s deputy press secretary, that he had asked one of his personal protection officers to dig up information about Ms Giuffre.

However, following weeks of assessment into the allegations, the Met has now wound up its investigation into the matter, saying it had found no additional evidence of criminal acts. The Met’s announcement is the latest in a string of decisions not to proceed to a full criminal investigation into allegations surrounding Mr Mountbatten-Windsor, when he was still known as Prince Andrew, over his friendship with the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

In a statement released by Scotland Yard on Saturday, Ella Marriott, Central Specialist Crime Commander, said: “Following recent reporting suggesting that Mr Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor asked his Met Police close protection officer to carry out checks on Ms Giuffre in 2011, the MPS has carried out a further assessment. This assessment has not revealed any additional evidence of criminal acts or misconduct.”

Ms Giuffre’s family, who have called for further investigation into the former prince, told The Telegraph they were not consulted over Scotland Yard’s decision to drop the inquiry and that “justice has not been served”. They said their only interaction with detectives was a single email received last week.

In a statement, the Giuffre family said: “We are deeply disappointed that the Metropolitan Police have dropped their investigation into Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor without explanation and without speaking with us, Virginia’s family.”

“We emailed with a detective from the Metropolitan Police yesterday, Friday, Dec 12, who gave us no indication that this announcement was imminent. Indeed, he asked us if we had any evidence we would like to present; we had not yet replied. With the Epstein files about to be released by Congress since the passage of the Epstein Transparency Act, we are surprised that the Metropolitan Police didn’t wait to see what further evidence might appear.”

Ms Giuffre’s family added: “While we have hailed the UK’s overall handling of the case of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor previously, today we feel justice has not been served. We continue to challenge the system that protects abusers, especially as more evidence comes to light that can hold people accountable. Our sister Virginia – and all survivors – are owed this much.”

[From The Telegraph]

There are three things/situations which give me pause about the state of British policing and how powerful people really do not give a f–k about anyone other than themselves. One, the complete abdication of responsibility from the police when it comes to investigating Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Andrew and their enablers within the UK. Two, the rolling fiasco that is Prince Harry’s years-long quest for security. Three, the police covering up the fact that their own people took bribes and covered up serious crimes for decades at the behest of the British tabloid media. Like, how does anyone within the Met Police or Scotland Yard operate when the public clearly has no reason to believe that cops serve and protect the community?

Photos courtesy of Backgrid, Cover Images. Screencaps courtesy of Surviving Jeffrey Epstein.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

18 Responses to “The police ended their inquiry into Andrew Windsor’s smears against Virginia”

  1. Amy Bee says:

    Not surprising at all. He’s still a Prince and a member of the Royal Family. They were never going to investigate him because that would lead to them investigating the police’s conduct as well. Are we to believe that Andrew stayed at Esptein’s house and Island without his RPOs?

  2. Harla says:

    You know, it’s situations like this that will contribute to the downfall of the British monarchy, people are seeing how they are treated with kid gloves, act above the law and above human decency, not to mention the gizillion homes and bags of cash. It’s yet another chip in the wall of the British monarchy.

  3. Steph says:

    “Following recent reporting suggesting that Mr Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor asked his Met Police close protection officer to carry out checks on Ms Giuffre in 2011, the MPS has carried out a further assessment. This assessment has not revealed any additional evidence of criminal acts or misconduct.”

    The wording of this is confusing. Are they saying they found no evidence of a crime or no evidence of additional crimes on top of sharing protected information without permission?

    • Smart&Messy says:

      I think they are saying they found no evidence that it ever happened. He said/she said… and they’d rather believe him.

    • Maja says:

      No, they say it is an international matter and must therefore be pursued internationally.
      I consider that a shameful excuse.

  4. No surprise! They seem to do as the Royal family dictates so the investigation is done. The powerful and rich get away with everything and control many things!!

  5. Brassy Rebel says:

    Has anyone said how “Mr. Mountbatten-Windsor” obtained her date of birth and social security number? That seems like relevant information in conducting a criminal investigation. I mean, they may be calling him Mr. M-W now, but he is still being treated like a prince.

    • Jay says:

      It’s particularly amazing when you consider that he still claims that he never met Virginia, right? Huh.

      Also, it seems obvious, but if he had her birthdate, that kind of puts to rest the argument that he “didn’t know” Virginia and the other girls were underage.

      • DK says:

        ALLLLL of this is why the police won’t investigate further (guess who probably gave it to him) and ALSO why the public should absolutely be up in arms about this cover up of harm and complicity.

    • jais says:

      This times a hundred. oooh, he’s not being called a prince anymore but he’s still being treated like a prince. Bc this is some bullsht.

  6. Annette says:

    When I hear about the Met police these days, I just think “rapists.”

    • DeeSea says:

      Yep. “Rapists” or “rapist apologists and protectors.” And they all live in the same hideous, corrupt, cruelty-fueled swamp.

  7. Mightymolly says:

    ‘Sup with those Epstein files?

  8. Bumblebee says:

    The UK is a small piece of land, when you used to be able to travel the world with ease. But it’s the only guaranteed safe place for him. Don’t leave, Randy Andy.

  9. Beverley says:

    Of course they did! The British police have been openly corrupt for years and never miss an opportunity to cover up the royals’ crimes. The British police are an organized criminal operation and apparently no one can hold them accountable.

  10. Lady D says:

    RIP, Virginia. You were horribly used and abused. Maybe one day your abusers will face justice.

  11. Me at home says:

    Andrew who? Here, have some hit pieces about the Sussexes and the mean things William wants to do to them.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment