Lauren Boebert has no interest in meeting with ‘King George’ during his state visit

This week, Buckingham Palace tried to confirm the itinerary for King Charles and Camilla’s US state visit. Charles & Cam will arrive on Monday, April 27 and stay in Washington for two days before heading to New York for a day, then they’ll go back to the DMV for a handful of events in Washington and Virginia. Within the first two days, Charles will address Congress. But Charles and Camilla will not meet with Jeffrey Epstein’s victims, despite a very loud pressure campaign to get them to do so. Charles and Camilla claim that meeting the survivors would somehow compromise the ongoing investigations and prosecutions of Epstein’s associates, including the king’s brother. The palace is being extremely fussy over all of these details while simultaneously trying to fluff up Charles as some kind of Trump-whisperer.

All of this is backstory for one of the funniest moments of the week. Rep. Lauren Boebert, the idiot MAGA Republican congresswoman, was asked about the upcoming royal state visit and whether the king should meet with the Epstein survivors. Every single second of this clip is comedy gold, from the reporter calling Charles “King George” to Boebert repeating it back whilst insisting that she has no interest in meeting King George because of 1776.

“1776, I have nothing to do with King George or the royal family, I’m America First.” Please. It’s PERFECTION. I’m reminded once again of that British podcast clip that circulated after QEII kicked the royal bucket, where the two cockney-accented British men were confused about who died and whether Charles was QEII’s husband. My point is that the Windsors can commission all of the emotional-support polls they want, but most people think King George is coming to America for the first time since his wife Liz died.

Photos courtesy of Cover Images.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

22 Responses to “Lauren Boebert has no interest in meeting with ‘King George’ during his state visit”

  1. I’m an American first too and I certainly don’t care about Chuck and Cam’s visit. But I do wonder if Lauren has answered for and repaid the campaign funds she used for personal use back yet? Has she gotten help for her abuser criminal son yet? Do we know?

  2. Digital Unicorn says:

    Am sue he isn’t interested in meeting the grifting public groper either and has likely not even been invited to either hence these comments.

  3. Mirandat says:

    “1776” (without the explanation; if you have to explain, your smart-ass remark has failed), in response to a question about meeting ANY king, would’ve actually been a mic-drop answer had it come from a Democrat. Kings suck. All of them. But this dumb bitch loves her demented pedo rapist king as much as she loves being ill-timed vaping white trash.

  4. Jais says:

    This is funny. But also that lady is not smart.

  5. Jay says:

    When I first read this, I thought she was talking about Trump because his most recent outbursts had people comparing him to the “mad king” George, lol.

  6. Chantal1 says:

    This is hilarious. While I would love for it to be pure shade, I’m aware that Lauren constantly competes for the dumbest MAGA in Congress award. And there’s a lot of them so competition is stiff! Also, isn’t C-Rex scheduled to give a speech to the US Congress during his visit ?

    I’m actually surprised that she remembered the significance of the year 1776. But since she and the rest of the MAGAs in both houses of Congress are continuing to subject the entire world to the ever increasing tyranny of Mad wannabe “king” Don bc they refuse to do their effin jobs, she needs to sit down and stfu.

    • Lightpurple says:

      I doubt she could pass a quiz on the events of 1775-1776 but she does frequently cite it, including in the messages she sent out during the attempted coup

  7. sunniside up says:

    I’m with Charles on the issue of meeting the victims, Would I want to meet the brother of a man who had raped me. No. Especially as the television cameras would be outside of where ever this meeting was held.

  8. Bumblebee says:

    Girl, you bow down to King Trump with the rest of them. Save your 1776 for someone who cares.

  9. Kitten says:

    In her defense, why should any American know the names of or care at all about the British monarchy? Why should any US lawmaker be concerned with what the BRF is doing?

    Maybe it’s a Boston thing. If you live or work here, you’re reminded every day of the Revolutionary War and the sacrifices that were made in the name of American independence and resistance against the monarchy. But I truly cannot stand the BRF and do my best to avoid knowing anything about them.

    • Lightpurple says:

      Hi, Kitten, as a Bostonian, who can’t go 10 feet without seeing some reminder of the events of 1770-1776, I’m curious whether Boebert could pass a simple quiz on the year. I would love to set her loose on the Freedom Trail, Cambridge Common, Dorchester Heights, and Middleman National Park and hear her explanations of what she’s looking at. But she probably would be petrified of being in a big, blue city

      • Kitten says:

        Hi, LP. Ah yes, Boston: another crime-ridden, Democrat-run city!
        Boebert could learn a thing or two from a walk along the Freedom Trail and up the Bunker Hill Monument. Maybe a visit to the Tea Party Museum and the USS Constitution. Not sure her bird brain would absorb any of it though….

      • Elly says:

        My hubby had a business trip in Boston many years ago and I went with him and walked the Freedom Trail. It was a fascinating experience that I still remember enjoying very much.

    • Neeve says:

      She should at least know who the King of the United Kingdom is since she works in Government.

      • Kitten says:

        She should know it because it’s something that most people know, whether they want to or not.

        But she doesn’t need to know it because she works in Congress. The monarchy are not government officials–they are non-political symbolic heads of state or rather, rich nepo babies living off the dime of British taxpayers. They’re essentially freeloaders who have no governmental power or business–the only power they have is social influence.

  10. Amy Bee says:

    Hmm…there’s a faction of MAGA that actually wants the US to become a monarchy and they will be thrilled that Charles and Camilla is visiting the US.

  11. Sue says:

    Lauren Boebert is a terrible person, but I really don’t mean this in a mean way: I truly believe that she has a pretty severe learning disorder.

  12. LK says:

    King George was king in 1776 but neither of these people know what they are talking about. Absolutely funny no one cares who the king is. Time to abolish the monarchy.

  13. Kittenmom says:

    I wonder if she knows the king’s name isn’t really George.

  14. QuiteContrary says:

    Last Fourth of July, I bought my English husband a T-shirt that reads: “The British blew a 13-colony lead.”

    Boebert is a moron, but I also don’t care that King WhatsHisName is coming.

  15. Magdalena says:

    Why do I get the impression that it’s KP staff who have been urging the king to go to the US post-haste, while crossing their fingers and hoping that this provides a quicker route to a Scooter Kingship?

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment