Lindsay Lohan is now accused of stealing $35 K Rolex

wenn5460570

At this point, it’s kind of easier to make a list of things that Lindsay Lohan has NOT stolen. The latest item that Lindsay is accused of stealing is a $35,000 Rolex which belonged to one of her “friends”. Seriously, TMZ put “friends” in quotes, like they can’t believe it either. Like “if you were really Lindsay’s friend you would know she’s a cracked out jewel thief.” So, let’s add “Rolex” to our list of sh-t that Lindsay has stolen throughout the years: a fur coat, clothing and leggings designs, $10,000 worth of clothes from a friend, thousands of dollars worth of jewels in Paris, $400,000 worth of jewelry from a magazine shoot, and those are only the ones I could find in a quick 2-minute search. Ugh. Here’s more from the Rolex heist:

Lindsay Lohan has been named a suspect in the theft of a $35,000 Rolex watch, law enforcement sources tell TMZ.

We’re told the watch belongs to one of Lindsay’s “friends,” who accidentally left it at Lindsay’s house earlier this year — and never got it back.

But sources tell us that cops have photographic evidence which could prove Lindsay knows exactly where the Rolex went. We’re told cops rolled over to Lohan’s pad Wednesday to question the actress about the Rolex — but Lindsay denied any involvement in the theft.

So far, no arrests have been made in the case — but it’s another major issue for Lohan … who seems to be in a downward spiral.

Lindsay’s lawyer, Shawn Chapman Holley, tells TMZ, “The allegations are completely untrue.”

[From TMZ]

Wow, Lindsay still has a lawyer! There’s a silver lining, I suppose. But this Holley dude isn’t the same one who filed the milkaholic lawsuit! Oh, Lindsay must have multiple lawyers to cover up all of her cracked out shenanigans.

Oh, TMZ just updated their story – apparently the cops have a photo of Lindsay wearing the stolen Rolex. TMZ thinks that the photo could be from last week, when Lindsay was doing some cracked out shopping instead of making an appearance at her deposition – but TMZ doesn’t know if it’s the same allegedly stolen watch. Look at me, I dropped an “allegedly” on Lindsay! F-ck me, I know she did it. Here are photos from the same day, with Lindsay wearing this watch that could be the stolen one:

wenn5460585

wenn5460483

Lindsay on April 14, 2010 in LA, Credit: WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

45 Responses to “Lindsay Lohan is now accused of stealing $35 K Rolex”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. isabelle says:

    Her hair looks AWFUL

  2. Lem says:

    perfectly.written.kaiser

  3. Ruby Red Lips says:

    So frustrating that she continually gets away with being above the law

    Maybe a spell in prison would go some way to wake her up

  4. Lem says:

    lest we forget in last night’s tweek(t) -a-polooza LL say’s her lawyer isn’t answering. A clue as to why she would have so many perhaps?

    well that or all the illegal crap she pulls

  5. Risa says:

    I am NOT protecting LL in this case- BUT, there are more than one Rolex watches in the world she “could” have bought that on her shopping spree…

    now I even got in on the hypothetical quoting!!! lol

  6. MARKY MARK says:

    It never ends with this wreck. Her life isn’t a “LIFETIME MOVIE” anymore. I’m looking for this shit on Scy-fy channels, because she actually is some sort of monster that won’t stop

  7. Alarmjaguar says:

    blah, blah, blah, LL is a total wacked out mess…can we take a moment to contemplate the shoes in that first picture, wtf? Are those ankle socks part of the shoe, are they holding up the straps, what’s going on there?

  8. Marjalane says:

    How sad. It isn’t even a question of, “Did she steal it?” It’s “Of course she stole it- she’s got to pay her dealer somehow”. They need to lock this trainwreck up for a year or two.

  9. happymom says:

    I love how she can’t get a ride to her depositions-yet has no problems shopping, clubbing and getting to Coachella.

  10. GatsbyGal says:

    Kinda surprised she hasn’t pawned it for crack money yet.

    What is she going to have to do to get thrown in jail? Hit a kid with her car? Stab a man to death in front of 100 witnesses??

  11. andrea says:

    hey, she’s gotta pay for the crack somehow!

    shawn chapman holley was a member of OJ’s defense team. so basically, she had LOADS of integrity.
    shawn is also a woman, not a dude.

  12. Samantha says:

    I can see her not being able to get a ride from her friends. People who break the law tend to be super paranoid and assume cops do things and know things and smell things, like they are superhuman. “Nah man, I can’t give you a ride…because broad! Remember that one time we smoked crack in back of the car? They can still smell that sh– girl, I don’t wanna go to jail. Coachella? Oh hell yeah I’ll give you a ride, partay!”

  13. Jackson says:

    Don’t pick on her! She’s just a child!!!!!

    ….There. I saved Dina Lohan a press release.

  14. azura says:

    Lindsay Lohan is not accused (at least not yet), she is a suspect

  15. Wow says:

    I almost feel bad for her due to all of these bad pictures various blogs are using of her to go along with these posts. She takes the worse pictures that are captured when her face is all contorted in the most awful positions.

  16. gg says:

    You forgot the mink coat she selected from that club coatroom that time.

    a) What kind of idiot would pay 35K for a watch?

    b) What kind of idiot would leave said watch at LL’s house?

    If she has the watch it’s the idiot’s fault this time.

  17. Bonfire Beach says:

    I’m at the point now where I hate her.

    She always looks like she’s flaring her nostrils. Side effect from snorting God-knows-what, maybe?

  18. lucy2 says:

    Her face is looking totally bizarre.
    If I for some absurd reason had to be around her, I wouldn’t bring anything worth more than $100, and I’d nail down anything light enough for her to carry.

    I think some of her “friends” (and the police) need to go over to her house and start digging through the piles of stuff there. I bet they find a lot of things that have gone missing!

  19. Cheyenne says:

    She doesn’t look a day under 35.

    *looks again* Make that 40.

  20. geesus says:

    damn! she got so ugly now.

  21. I Choose Me says:

    Like “if you were really Lindsay’s friend you would know she’s a cracked out jewel thief.”

    Oh, Lindsay must have multiple lawyers to cover up all of her cracked out shenanigans.

    TMZ thinks that the photo could be from last week, when Lindsay was doing some cracked out shopping instead of making an appearance at her deposition

    So Kaiser, are you saying she’s on crack? 😀

    On a separate note, WTF are those beige things infront of Lindsay masquerading as shoes. Do people seriously purchase then wear such fuggery on purpose?

  22. Victoria says:

    @GG Thank you! I was thinking the SAME thing!

  23. lola lola says:

    What is it gonna take for someone or something to stop this train wreck?

    oh wait. This might be it.

  24. terry says:

    She will be doing soft porn soon, then explicit porn…then pulling tricks with couples.

  25. Wiley says:

    Remember how indignant LL was when her house was burglarized by those young people not long ago?

  26. poiup says:

    Ouch, her hair is screaming to be combed. I’m a guy and I just want to take a brush to it.

  27. TaylorB says:

    Wow you guys are awful hard on her, she looks great for her age, I hope that when I am in my mid 50’s like LiLo I look as good as she does… Wait, isn’t she like 23? Nevermind.

  28. Denver Hotel says:

    Why does it look as she hasn’t washed her hair in a month? :s

  29. TaylorB says:

    Denver,

    Not to speculate, but drunken junkies tend to struggle a titch with personal hygiene and grooming.

  30. e-non says:

    she’ll be lucky if she ends up dead or in prison. a photo earlier this week of her in a vehicle with two other women — one being a rough looking middle-aged woman — gave off a very bad vibe.

    someone is picking up her tab; and pretty soon she’s gonna have to pay up.

  31. gonzo says:

    e-non, i saw that same photo and when i saw the woman in the backseat i initially thought, “good god, what is she doing to herself?” then i realized in the caption that lindsay was sitting in the front, covering her head.

  32. Green Is Good says:

    B*tch better lay off the booze. She’s looking scary bloated.

  33. lurker says:

    I wouldn’t put it past her to think that she owns it simply because she found it in her house.

    Aren’t Rolexes registered or something, so it would be easy to track the owner of the watch?

  34. BW says:

    Kaiser: As far as when you write about LL — I certainly wouldn’t blame you for adding a couple of well-placed
    “allegedlys”. Even if it is true. You just get the feeling you might be glad you did later.

  35. mouth.like.a.sailor says:

    i’m just going to put this out there… did any of you guys see Lindsay’s apartment on (i think)Access Hollywood and how it basically was just piles and piles of clothes and accessories everywhere. they were calling her a “celebrity hoarder” because there was just so much crap everywhere, and even all over the dressers and tv stands, there was just crap everywhere… they had lindsay leave the apartment for 2days or whatever and they had some professional celebrity organizer lady come in and they had a team of people(im assuming) go through all the stuff and then reorganize it, they took all the jewelry they found and belts and accessories and created a whole accessory display area, like something you would see in the store, and they built a walk in closet and reorganized ALL of her clothing and belts and hats and shoes and EVERYTHING, it was crazy….
    now i’m just throwing this out there, but 1st of all: what kind of IDIOT takes off a $35,000 Rolex at lindsay lohans trashed, crazy, hoarder looking apartment?????? i wouldn’t take it off my wrist at all, no matter what!! watches are not that uncomfortable to sleep in.
    2nd: just by chance, lets go along with this and say this person did take off their watch for whatever stupid reason. after they left the next morning and within the next 24-48hrs realized they had lost their watch or forgotten…dont you think they would have made a point to go back to the house to get the watch…not all of a sudden, MONTHS later say that lindsay lohan stole a watch that you left at her apartment cuz lindsay has a horrific reputation for stuff like this and everybody would probably just believe you and then she’ll get trashed in the press for your own stupidity of, FIRST, taking the watch off to begin with, and SECOND, for friggin leaving i there.

    i’m sorry it just sounds fishy. the whole stupid thing. another thing that crosses my mind is that after seeing her apartment and the condition of the mess and clutter i would not be surprised if she had no idea where the hell this watch actually was, and there is the chance that when this team of cleaners/organizers came in they swept it up in all the clutter and put it in the accessory display case with all the all jewels and baubles that she had there, i mean who knows where HALF that stuff came from…certainly not Lindsay, who we all know lives in some sort of drug/alcohol induced stupor half the time. i’m sorry, if you leave a $45 watch in an apartment that looks like that, you can probably expect to NEVER SEE IT AGAIN, much less a $35,000 watch-which i still don’t believe someone would have taken off and then forgotten to put it back on; and then after leaving,forgotten that they didn’t have their $35,000 watch for months so that way several months later (instead of HOURS which it seems to me would have been more likely, or maybe a few days at the most) they are trying to file a police report that someone stole it…
    most likely they had it insured, when they realized they lost it, they got the bright idea to try to file an insurance claim for it and say it was stolen so that way they can just get the $$$ and get a new one OR just get the $$$ and use it pay off THEIR dealer(cuz lets be honest, anyone staying at Linds apartment and forgets where they put $35,000 watches also HAS TO BE On drugs too) anyway, when the theft was mentioned their insurance adjuster would have told them right off the bat that they would need to file a police report first for the claim to be processed as an actual theft, which is the only way that they would pay the money for it. so now they are filing a police report saying that they lost it at lindsay lohan’s house and that it was stolen there. which is then warped into “Lindsay Lohan steals $35,000 Rolex that someone left at her apartment!!!” is that even the definition of stealing…if someone loses something at your house that doesn’t seem like “stealing” i mean, not technically (am i sounding like Dina now?!?) a normal person when they found it would return it to it’s owner. but let’s be totally honest…. if i had a Memorial Day BBQ and a ton of people showed up, if someone was there that was a friend of a friend and they ended up drunk and sleeping on my couch, assuming that there are probably a few other people or couples that are also staying the night just to be safe…if that person, who is totally just a mere aquaintence had gotten shitfaced at my house and then annoyed me and then passed out there left a reeeeally cute hoodie there (or whatever, hoodie is the 1st thing that popped into my head) and then i didn’t hear back from them for a few months or weeks or whatever, i cant guarantee that i wouldn’t have just kept it and been like, “Jesus that girl was annoying, i cant believe she left her hoodie here! thank god i’ll never see her again…” is that actually considered ACTUAL STEALING?? i dunno. anyway, just putting it out there….

  36. mouth.like.a.sailor says:

    ps- sorry for that ridiculously long post above… i’m not good at being concise and to the point i guess! i just wanted to throw some other line of logic at the subject because, for some reason, after reading the story something just didn’t quite seem right about the whole thing.

    not that i’m trying to defend her cuz i’m her #1/only fan…. i just felt the need to put a logical opposing point of view

  37. abbizmal says:

    It could be just allegedly since, like others said, since taking off a watch in her dump of an apt is beyond stupid. If the person did take off the watch, it could be under some crap, but like her sticky fingers got it. And what is wrong with her parents leaving Ali with her? That girl is doing the same things, we just haven’t seen it yet. Hide and watch.

  38. bellaluna says:

    Those fug shoes in the first pic look like a hybrid open-toed ankle-support heel. WTF?

  39. Bodhi says:

    The coming back months later is kinda fishy, IMO, but who knows? I certainly wouldn’t put it past her

  40. Dhavy says:

    I think she’s in a head to head competition with Britney Spears on who looks like the drunk woman that sleeps on a cardboard under the bridge, and so far is a tie!

    Hair not washed for a month-
    Make up smeared all over-
    Clothes worn around the trailer home-
    Smoking-
    Fish lips-
    Nasty chipped/discolored nails-
    Looking 15 yrs older-

    Please feel free to add anything I missed….

  41. Madisyn says:

    First off, Holley didn’t file the lawsuit because she is a respectable attorney, (if there is such a thing) who knew the suit was bogus and wouldn’t attach her name to it. Second, Whorehan paid her debt to her drug dealer the minute she found it. Whatever watch she has on her wrist is, well, could be anyones guess

  42. bb says:

    You forgot the 1 1/2 inches of ginge roots. ugh.

  43. Angie says:

    Puffy face, weight gain, baggie clothing, undyed hair …. is she pregnant?!

  44. Crash2GO2 says:

    About her and Brit Brit’s hair – when you have extensions, combing or brushing is not a straightforward process, or else you would simply pull the extensions out when you hit a good snag. And you can’t blow dry using a comb or brush either. That is why the girls with extensions who can’t be bothered to spend much time on their hair look so bedraggled.

    As for the Rolex: I’m with the who the hell spends 35K on a f*cking watch? crowd. That’s ridiculous.

  45. TaylorB says:

    Angie,

    Dear God I hope not. The last thing LiLo needs is to have a child with FAS or a drug addiction.