Palace insiders: Prince Louis, 8 years old, is ‘media gold’ & ‘the Crown’s secret weapon’

British Royals Attend The Commonwealth Games

On Saturday, the entire Wales family attended the Commonwealth Games in Glasgow. In my opinion, they were likely ordered to show up en masse by Buckingham Palace or perhaps even their own clownish staffers. The Daily Mail was clearly trying to pressure Prince William and Kate into going to the games last week. The old tug on the leash from their media handlers, I guess. What was slightly funny about the family’s appearance at the games is that the over-the-top keenery belied the fact that everyone expects William and Kate to be lazy and hidden away. They’ve succeeded at setting the bar in hell. So once they actually show up, people are like “wow, this is SO unusual, we thought you guys would be on vacation for three solid months!” Which isn’t really a win for W&K, but don’t tell them that.

Anyway, almost as soon as all three Wales kids appeared, everyone focused on Prince Louis, because he rarely gets to join his siblings at public events. Granted, we just saw him at Trooping the Colour in June, but that’s basically the only time they allow him in public these days. Well, royalists have zero chill about Louis, and there are already commentary pieces about “Louis’s charm offensive” and “Louis is the real secret weapon!” The child is 8 years old. Let poor Sophie be the secret weapon for a few more years and leave the kids alone.

Prince Louis has quietly become the Royal Family’s biggest breakout star—and palace insiders tell Naughty But Nice that’s no coincidence. After charming crowds with his infectious grin, playful energy, and effortless confidence at the Commonwealth Games, the youngest Wales child emerged as the royal everyone was talking about. Behind palace walls, we’re told the reaction was one of satisfaction, not surprise.

“Louis is media gold,” a senior palace source tells Naughty But Nice. “You can’t manufacture that kind of charisma. He genuinely loves meeting people, lights up in a crowd, and never looks like he’s performing. What you see is exactly who he is.”

Rather than toning him down, insiders say Kensington Palace views Louis as a vital part of the monarchy’s future.

“He’s the Crown’s secret weapon,” another insider says. “George represents duty, Charlotte projects confidence, and Louis brings joy. Within seconds he can make people smile, and that’s an extraordinary gift for a modern royal.”

The approach stands in sharp contrast to Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s decision to keep Archie and Lilibet largely out of public view. While the Sussexes have also carefully controlled images of their children, William and Catherine have gradually introduced George, Charlotte, and Louis to royal life.

“The Palace believes familiarity builds trust,” says one source. “The public feels they’ve grown up alongside these children, creating a connection that can’t be manufactured.”

Don’t expect Louis to become a full-time royal attraction just yet. Palace aides remain committed to protecting his childhood.

“This wasn’t a one-off,” a royal insider says. “The Palace knows exactly what it has in Prince Louis—and you’ll be seeing a lot more of him in the years ahead.”

[From Rob Shuter’s Substack]

The thing is, I actually think “palace sources” are saying this. Like, dusty old courtiers are gleefully rubbing their hands together and trying to figure out how to push all three kids out into the public sphere, especially Charlotte and Louis (the spares). George is always going to be more protected, as his father was, while the spares are fed to the wolves and mercilessly scapegoated. I’m so uncomfortable with calling an eight-year-old “media gold” as well – he was just acting his age in public, with his family. He was actually very well-behaved at the CG. The sad truth is that the courtiers and the royalists *want* Louis to be gregarious and chaotic because that’s a built-in comparison with George: George is studious, thoughtful, controlled and stable… unlike his brother George. The Windsors are just going to keep reheating these nachos forever.

The Prince and Princess of Wales, Duke and Duchess of Rothesay, attend the Commonwealth Games in Glasgow

The Prince and Princess of Wales, Duke and Duchess of Rothesay, attend the Commonwealth Games in Glasgow

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Cover Images.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

79 Responses to “Palace insiders: Prince Louis, 8 years old, is ‘media gold’ & ‘the Crown’s secret weapon’”

  1. Seaside says:

    They are looking for Harry 2.0

    Do leave that child alone!

    • Nancy says:

      Exactly. They are setting him up just like they did for Harry and people are buying into it. I made a comment on another site about why they hardly ever bring Louis along and so many pearl clutchers were indignant and ready to tell me how Louis is a loose cannon and cannot behave himself. They did stop short of raving about him writing a book though Lolol.

    • SarahCS says:

      My first thought. They are all very excited that they may have another Harry that they can hang out to dry and scapegoat to protect George. Charlotte might be in the middle but it’s easier to compare and contrast two boys, particularly as they already have a template for that.

    • Normades says:

      Exactly. NGL he’s super cute with his hat but that’s what they want. Charming brother to throw under the bus when they need too.

      • Lisa says:

        They have already started and Will and Kate are either to oblivious or don’t care.

        Charlotte = Anne and Louis = Harry

        The press will not make it easy for the spares to forge their own way.

    • MelodyM says:

      This exactly! They are describing him the same way Harry is described! The family doesn’t need adult Harry..they are raising their own Harry…one they think/hope they can control. Louis is cute. That grin is infectious. He was obviously having a great time. He was being a kid. But he’s only 8. Who knows who he will become as he grows. I just hope he will have the chance to become his own person but I fear for his chances at that unless he follows in Uncle Harry’s footsteps.
      PS: George looks completely different when he smiles! Wow!

  2. Shiela Kerr says:

    Exactly what you get when you sell your children for positive press. I pity this child.

  3. Josephine says:

    As if we did not need another reason to abolish the monarchy. Congrats, lazy, you’ll probably get to be queen if you had hold on to ragey, and all you had to do was give up your kids as commodoties to the machine.

  4. Steampug says:

    What is the British media’s obsession with “secret weapon”. That and “poignant tribute”.

  5. Tessa says:

    He’s 8 years old and some in the media want him to be a child actor to entertain and be secret weapon. I thought the keens wanted normal upbringing for the kids.

  6. Tessa says:

    Keen goes in for pointing at things around the kids.

    • Delta Juliet says:

      Right? It’s so strange.

    • Lucy says:

      My kids are a similar age and I think I’ve pointed at stuff for them maybe a handful of times. The only times I can recall is when I was directing them about where they were going. It’s contrived for photos, which is hella weird, and I was raised that pointing was rude so I think it’s odd from a gold standard politeness standard too.

  7. Jegede says:

    At least Louis, is lucky to have a somewhat stable extended family, than the neurotic, never ending Charles/Diana wars that scarred William & Harry badly.

    O/T I say Prince Louis will end up the best looking.
    Though all the Wales’ kids are growing up much more attractive than I pegged for them.

    • Tessa says:

      The boys needed their mother diana things would have imo been better.The queen and charles should have treated diana better. The wales are not perfect.

    • Blubb says:

      You think the Middletons are stable? Have they paid their debts? None of the three children really worked for a living ever. And granny likes to drink. You should doubt their official pr more.

    • Ommia says:

      I agree that the Middletons are more grounded than their royal counterparts. Kate gets on well with BOTH her parents AND her brother. The kids undoubtedly enjoy a closer relationship with the Middleton grandparents than C&C.

      • Iolanthe says:

        Kate may be ok with parents and brother but where are the women and children ..we dont see anything of Alizee , Pippa and their children , there must be at least four cousins . Meghan and her kids are anyway ostracized . No women friends , no relatives on the Middleton side except shady Uncle Gary

  8. Jais says:

    Even just saying an 8 yr old is charismatic feels weird. The way royalists and the media talk about these kids makes me want to take a shower.

  9. Tessa says:

    Louise was called the secret weapon a few years ago now it is Louis.

    • Alicky says:

      Don’t forget Sophie! Honestly, how many ‘secret weapons” does one family need?

      • Kittenmom says:

        Why do families even need “weapons” at all. Weird people.

      • BeanieBean says:

        Yeah, weapons against what?

      • Lorelei says:

        @Beanie, EXACTLY! They give themselves away with stuff like this…they know they’re all nothing but grifters, and just want to keep the con going as long as they can. They reveal their guilty consciences with nonsense like, “secret weapon,” “peacemaker,” etc. They know they’re not in a family, they’re in a viper’s nest.

  10. gaffney says:

    Is the Royal Family still a thing just so it can prop up British trash media?

    • Interested Gawker says:

      I think it’s become a sort of negative feedback loop. The BRF has decoupled from the aristocracy and the general public to the point they put Kate on the front page holding the Wimbledon trophy instead of the actual winner of the tournament because gaining attention for themselves alone is the only priority. WanK and C&C will never have Diana’s popularity- even H&M don’t have that. Diana was practically tortured by the media but her level of fame has always been something the Windsors covet to have for themselves and those papers pray for a lucrative engine to prop up their ever lower readership numbers as well as trying to persuade the public that the royals still matter when they don’t actually do much that’s useful and hoover up tax money for their ‘slimmed down’ operation.

  11. Becks1 says:

    Did someone tell Sophie?!?!?! The royals have a new secret weapon and its not her!!!!

    In all seriousness though, this kind of article is so problematic. they’re literally assigning these children to their permanent media roles – duty, confidence, joy. (why is no one concerned that George doesn’t seem to project joy?)

    These are kids. And Louis seems like an especially happy and outgoing kid. But its clear that the palace isn’t looking at him as a child – they’re looking at him in terms of how he will help the monarchy. That’s the only job of all three of these children – to boost the monarchy’s PR in general and their parents in particular. and they’re not even trying to hide it.

  12. seraphina says:

    Real question here: Were QE2’s kids also pushed into this story line (protect the heir at all costs and throw the rest to the wolves) or is this something that has grown from Charles and his insecurities and Willy is following suit because he too is insecure?

    • Becks1 says:

      i’m not sure they were pushed into the storyline this way, but there was also a big age gap – Andrew is 11 or 12 years younger than Charles, by the time Andrew was interesting for the tabloids, Charles was married to Diana, and then Fergie entered the picture. I think some of the marriage messiness went back and forth in terms of who got the worst of it, but if Andrew wasn’t being protected, we would have heard way more about his crimes than we did until recently.

      The heir and the spare has always been an interesting, sometimes verging on problematic. dynamic, honestly dating back to the sons of William the Conqueror. And I do think its “normal” that the heir is treated differently (we know that Charles was always treated differently by the Queen Mother for example.) would Elizabeth and Margaret have turned out the same, personality wise, if they weren’t the heir and spare? (although that is an interesting case study since Elizabeth wasn’t the heir presumptive until she was, what, 10? and Margaret was 6? so their personalities would have already been relatively well formed.) And remember apparently their father used to say that Elizabeth was his pride, and Margaret was his joy. What does that sound like…..

      But I think the way harry was used essentially as fodder for the press to protect William is something different. Maybe its bc of Charles being a crap father, maybe its because of how the press landscape has changed, maybe its because the monarchy is increasingly seen as a tool for selling papers and generating clicks and nothing else.

      • seraphina says:

        You know Becks, as I came back I do recall the “My pride and my joy” saying from QE2’s father. And it could be everything combined (that you mentioned). And I guess that is why Diana tried to give them a normal childhood and shield the kids from the dysfunction. And she was the most blue blood of the entire family she entered into.

    • YankeeDoodles says:

      That’s a good question, @Seraphina. Definitely Margaret was treated as the lightning rod in contrast to Elizabeth, but that also reflected their personalities — Margaret was a lot more racy, subversive, and bohemian. She had rizz. Unfortunately, she also had a drinking problem, a terribly truncated / tragic romantic life, and a divorce when it was really infra dig. She turned into a sad case. That’s one generation of siblings split by the institution. But Anne wasn’t treated badly, she was sharp with the press and they actually respected her for it, the tone of the coverage was totally different to the fawning you see now. One of them called her “love” at a photo call and she snapped, “I’m not your love, I’m your Royal Highness,” and that was that. She really did pull rank when they stepped on her toes. I love that. Charles would have benefited so much from some of his sister’s backbone. Continuing with siblings, Andrew wasn’t treated at all badly, despite the media and the entire grey men’s flotilla knowing all about how sybaritic, dodgy, corrupt, and disreputable he was. Edward was kind of an awkward afterthought, and way too young to compare to Charles. Siblings don’t have to crash out, even if the media / courtiers are rooting for them to fail. They have a role. Anne really did set the pattern, but you also have to remember, she was only the spare until Andrew was born, that is, until she was 10. So the pressure was off, then.

      • BeanieBean says:

        Huh. I remember a lot of Randy Andy stories in the tabloids. And they really ripped into Edward for quitting the Marines. Charles got a lot of ‘dashing prince future king’ stuff before he married Diana. Anne, hmm, I think they attempted a lot of ‘isn’t she lovely, this princess’ stuff but, well, she’s Anne. Her 21st birthday photo is quite nice, though.

      • Becks1 says:

        I think there’s a difference between negative stories in the press, and negative stories being fed to the press to make the heir look better while never reporting on the heir’s issues or flaws.

        the press definitely reported on charles’ issues – even when they were trying to hush up the marriage troubles, Charles wasn’t portrayed as the perfect heir with no flaws etc. his siblings faults and failures were covered – Edward DID quit the Marines for example – but not used as routinely or regularly to deflect from Charles.

    • Bqm says:

      No this is definitely a product of the Charles and Diana briefing wars and subsequent Camilla push. The queen never needed her kids for good pr. She didn’t fear being overshadowed. She and Margaret were loving despite their different personalities. And Elizabeth’s kids actually did all have different personalities and strengths that their coverage just recognized.

    • monlette says:

      It happened even before that, with her uncle painted as the dashing prince, and her father being the pitiful stutterer, which created quite the upheaval during the abdication crisis.

  13. kelleybelle says:

    “Secret weapon” is a term I’ve come to despise when it comes to palace media. Secret weapon for what, against what, and why? It’s beyond ridiculous. They were saying not too long ago that Kate’s photography was the palace’s “secret weapon,” and then Sophie (*gag*) was their “secret weapon.” I’ve never heard anything so senseless.

  14. Mimi says:

    I don’t think it’s just about trying to find another Harry. They are trying to find someone who can compete with Archie and Lily for public interest. George and Charlotte have been seen in public many times and, respectfully, there doesn’t seem to be any organic interest in either of them, not to the extent that the British media would like. So now they are pivoting to baby boy because he has managed to get attention, albeit for his poor behavior. They want us to believe that him acting up is cheeky and charming, when it’s actually not. We saw how bratty his father was as a young boy and it’s clear that he has picked up some of those habits. Of course, no one wants to talk about that.

  15. amy says:

    Of the three Windsor kids, he was the only one who appeared to be having a good time and wanted to be there. Of the whole family, really.

    • Lisa says:

      Maybe that was because they finally let him go to an outing- he was like ‘I’m free and outside!’.

      They have three children- the heir, the spare and the extra. The other two are paraded around because George is the heir and Charlotte is a girl (so we can comment on how ‘beautiful she is and how like her mother she is’). Louis is just there. It could be due to his age but they could have him sit there for an hour at most and then hand him off to his nanny.

  16. Amy Bee says:

    Poor Louis. These people have learnt nothing from Harry’s experience.

  17. Jensa says:

    How many “secret weapons” does this family need?
    Give me strength.

    • Chrissy says:

      Yes, how do they supposedly have all these “secret weapons”, and yet, that “family” looks like nothing but a totally dysfunctional, back-stabbing sh*t show?

    • Jensa says:

      It’s because the royal family is so lacklustre and there’s no one around with any star quality.
      You never heard talk of a “secret weapon” in Diana’s day, for example.

  18. Turnawry says:

    Desperation for a royal savior, or a distraction, in gutter press catchphrase “journalism” over the years:

    “[Zara Tindall] has often been dubbed the Royal Family’s secret weapon…” — DM 15 May 2026
    “[T]he King has a new’ secret weapon’… Prince Edward…” — DM 28 Feb.2026
    “Inside the life of the ‘secret weapon of the Royal Family’as she celebrates her 10th birthday-and why the princess ‘rules the roost’ at Adelaide Cottage” — DM 1 May 2025
    “Princess Anne is the Royal Family’s ‘secret weapon’…” — Daily Express 7 Feb. 2024
    “Camilla is the real boss’… and the royals’ greatest secret weapon’…” — DM 18 Sept. 2022
    “Lady Louise Windsor has been tipped to be the slimmed down monarchy’s secret weapon’…” DM 24 Sept. 2021
    “Sophie Wessex is the royal family’s ‘secret weapon’…” — DM 10 Nov. 2020

  19. Beverley says:

    But, I thought Lady Louise had taken that title off her mother Sophiesta. What happened to her? Is Louise no longer the Firm’s “secret weapon”?

    I agree with everyone who say that the British media intends to marginalize, attack, and abuse Louis the way they did Harry. And for all their heroic parental energy, WanK is going to let them.

  20. harriet says:

    I’ve actually wondered if William is jealous of the media attention Louis gets.

    I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: Louis is too cute for words. God I loved how he told his sister no when she told him to stop dancing on the balcony.

  21. tamsin says:

    They will always need secret weapons when their principals are rubbish. They’re now into their fourth generation of “dutiful heir” and “naughty spare” that they can scapegoat. Elizabeth held her own by doing her job well, had a certain amount of glamour and had the respect of the world. Charles had randy Andy but they were far apart in age, so he was able to be an excellent PoW but a lousy husband and father. Things really are falling apart because William is the first incompetent and lazy heir in this cycle. The dynamic among the siblings might be different because there is Charlotte in between.

    • Lorelei says:

      I cannot even imagine some of the cruel things that already would have been said/printed if there was no Charlotte and it was just the boys. Louis, unfortunately, seems to have just what it takes for these crap tabloids to make him Harry 2.0 in the media.

    • monlette says:

      Charles had Anne as the dutiful helpmate between him and Andrew.

  22. KC2 says:

    Historically and personally on schedule. Henry VIII was the spare and England’s golden boy. It was only bad luck for his brother and the country he became King. Then look at families you know and see how roles are portioned out. The eldest is usually the sedate, responsible one, the neglected middle scapegoat, and the youngest can be the scamp and prodigal son. I saw it with by SIL’s kids and my best friend’s family.

    • Tessa says:

      Prince Arthur Henry’s elder brothewas sickly and died young. If he had survived Catherine of aragon had a child. Arthur and catherines heir or heiress would have established a line

    • YankeeDoodles says:

      Actually the really interesting case is Charles I — whose older brother was the golden boy of his day, both sons of James I & VI, who was the heir to Elizabeth I but son of Mary, Queen of Scots. Henry VIII was obviously Elizabeth I’s father. She was the last of the Tudors and James founded the Stuart dynasty. I forget the name of James I & VI’s oldest son, but he was expected to consolidate the new dynasty and then died tragically young, leaving a sickly, insecure, wobbly Charles I to inherit. And he was beheaded for overcompensating, effectively, he was a Beta trying to play Alpha, and it didn’t work.

  23. Mel says:

    Oh dear lord, leave that child alone. He’s not a secret weapon , he’s eight, let him eight!!!

  24. Simple chuck says:

    When any of the wales kids act their age, mostly Louis, they compare them to Harry. Harry as a child was super reserved, never “naughty ” always quieting public. They’re rewriting history as usual.

    • harriet says:

      William had awful behavior at Andrew & fergs’ wedding. Of course he was only four and he looked cute in his little sailor outfit.

  25. BeanieBean says:

    Hey, rota rats! May I call you that? I’m going to anyway. So–leave the children alone!!!! They are not media gold, secret weapons, the saviors of the monarchy, none of that. They’re kids! Let them be!

  26. bisynaptic says:

    They’re going to try to paint him into the “cheeky Harry“ role.

  27. QuiteContrary says:

    Unless Louis makes a run for it and escapes that vipers den, he doesn’t stand a chance of a happy adulthood.

    He’s already being set up to play court jester, poor kid.

  28. jferber says:

    How many “secret weapons” do they have and what war are they fighting? What effing world are they living in that an 8 year old can do battle for them? And vanquish the competition? Frigging demented morons.

  29. Rachel says:

    I hope he will be ok. No reason he can’t live a happy private life. Really hope he’s not pitted against George and made to look the fool to embiggen the heir.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment