Experts analyze Elizabeth Holmes’ stare: ‘A lot of psychopaths do that’

Screenshot from trailer for You Can See Everything, two photos of Holmes, one with Fielder
The surprise revelation of Nathan Fielder and Lance Oppenheim’s Elizabeth Holmes documentary, You Can See Everything, has been one of the biggest stories coming out of Fall Film Festival Season so far. People have strong opinions over the fact that someone made another film about the convicted fraudster. Meanwhile, the critics and industry folks invited to Telluride’s super-secret screening last week seemed to go bananas for it. After watching the one-minute teaser trailer, a frighteningly close-up shot of Holmes and filmmaker/protagonist Fielder, I described the interaction as “two humanoids sussing each other out.” The thing is, it’s intentional performance art on Fielder’s part. But Holmes? Let’s just say, her “humanoid” comes more naturally. If you think that’s mean of me to say, it’s nothing compared to the diagnosis of body language expert Susan Constantine, who has been following Holmes since her meteoric rise, and claims she was hip to Holmes’ lies as far back as 2013. Upon studying the teaser, Constantine shared her assessments with the New York Post. In short: Holmes looks like a psychopath.

The stare: Holmes’ wild-eyed, unblinking gaze and repeated insistence that she’s “not deceiving” filmmakers has sparked a flurry of online commentary since a trailer for the doc, titled “You Can See Everything,” was released after its premiere at the Telluride Film Festival over the weekend. … “She’s got laser-focused eye contact, wide-eyed, no blinking — not even a little blinking…It’s like a stalker stare, which is what everybody is talking about,” body language expert Susan Constantine told The Post.

‘Massive clusters of deception’: “A lot of psychopaths do that because they’re trying to be convincing. She has the raised eyebrows, staring eyes and wide-open smile, which is also what we call “dooping delight,’” Constantine said. The phrase refers to “that smile a person gets if they are pulling over a big whopper and they feel like they’re being successful with it,” she explained. “Natural expressions don’t freeze on the face — they are on and off…which is how I know it’s performative,” Constantine said. … Taken altogether, Homes’ questionable body language and bizarre choice of words reveal “massive clusters of deception,” according to Constantine, who also specializes in statement analysis.

Unusual phrasing: As the trailer begins with an extreme close-up of Holmes’ face, she tells Fielder: “I’m not that person. I can promise you that. I don’t have anything to deceive you on. Of course, I’m not deceiving you. I’m engaging with you as a human being. Why would I deceive you? There’s no — there’s no reason for me to do that,” she continues. According to Constantine, Holmes’ use of the present-tense is telling. “It’s like saying, ‘I don’t have anything in my pocket to deceive you on — right now’…instead of just, ‘No, I’m not deceiving you,’” Constantine explained. “She’s answering the logic behind the accusation before giving the denial.”

Always acting: At another point in the clip, Holmes slightly softens her voice while tilting her head to the side — a shift that marks an attempt to seem vulnerable or likeable, Constantine said. … “Here, she’s not as commanding,” Constantine said about the trailer, and pointed to the lower-octave voice Holmes adopted in the early years of her bogus company in order to seem more authoritative in business settings. Today, “Her voice has softened in volume…it seems a little exhausted.” Still, the fraudster has long appeared to be “performative,” Constantine said, as well as “highly aware of how [she’s] being perceived.” “So it’s almost as if she is always acting and she’s not even in touch with her real self.”

[From NY Post]

Body language experts can sometimes seem hit-or-miss (or maybe that’s just the ones the Daily Mail uses), but this observation of Constantine’s intrigued me: “She’s answering the logic behind the accusation before giving the denial.” The accusation being that Holmes was deceiving Fielder, to which (humanoid) Holmes replied, “I’m engaging with you as a human being.” I clocked that phrasing the first time I watched the trailer as especially odd. Not only is it obviously not conversational language, there’s something telling about her instinct to insist she’s behaving like a human. It reminded me of being in an acting class where a teacher pointed out that, contrary to what you’d think would be logical, human behavior tends to direct others to the very thing they’re trying to hide. (My having just stood up and wrapped my cardigan closer around my stomach only served to illustrate the teacher’s point.) And yeah, there’s always something deeply unnerving about someone who doesn’t blink. At all. Anyway, if you want more, Constantine has a new book coming out in February — How to Spot a Liar in 7 Seconds — that uses Holmes as a case study. The sub-title is Protect Yourself from Criminals, Cons, Predators, and More. I assume the “more” refers to presidents.

Embed from Getty Images

screenshot of Elizabeth Holmes on the news outside court

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

16 Responses to “Experts analyze Elizabeth Holmes’ stare: ‘A lot of psychopaths do that’”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. anotherlily says:

    Kate Middleton stares like that.

    • KNB says:

      Oh come on, Kate Middleton isn’t a psychopath. She’s socially nervous and uncomfortable in her role and over performs enthusiasm as a result.

      • MangoAngel says:

        Psychopathic, no, but definitely a narcissist. They’re pretty close in external behaviors.

      • KNB says:

        It’s interesting that you should say that but I disagree. Narcissists are very often quite charming. I don’t sense that she has much personality or charm at all, no social power or ability to draw people to her at all. She’s just a successful social striver, that’s all. I don’t think she has much of a core.

    • Mina_Esq says:

      I would have chosen Princess Beatrice, if I wanted to go down the Windsor comparison path. Kate is just a mean girl, not a psychopath.

      • BrackenSweetwater says:

        I don’t think Beatrice does the stare thing, it’s just that she has slightly protruding eyes and the British media loves to pick photos taken in the 3 milliseconds where her eyes are open the widest and emphasizing that buggyness.

  2. Yup, Me says:

    I always wonder why people don’t call out odd psychopathic and narcissistic behaviors in the moment. It’s a way to break the spell they are trying to cast (but also, they are often really weird behaviors in social interactions). For instance, I would not be able to avoid asking Elizabeth Holmes “What’s with the stare? Aren’t your fucking eyes dry?”

  3. Chanteloup says:

    I have long! ago more than reached my max on psychopaths and liars so there’s not a chance in hell I’ll ever watch this but I’m just here to say Kismet, your last sentence is fire

  4. Anna says:

    A friend was riding her horse in Woodside when Holmes and her part wolf dog went running close by. My friend’s horse threw her, and she ended up crumpled on the ground. Holmes looked over and continued running. No sorry, are you alright Nothing.

  5. KC says:

    Yiiiikes! I was so uncomfortable watching her I couldn’t even finish the 60-second trailer. I haven’t followed this case so I don’t know a many details of the situation, just that she lied a lot and stole a lot of money. I want to watch this documentary, but I’m not sure I can physically stand it.

  6. Cadbury Eggs says:

    Holmes has the same empty look that Sarah Palin has.

  7. Noo says:

    Re “it’s intentional performance art on Fielder’s part” – and it’s also Fielder’s elicitation technique. Many Canadians remember his interviewing work on 22 minutes.

    Including the time when he absolutely destroyed his boss, the CEO of CBC Canada (at the time) in interview. 2.5 mins that is very worthwhile from 2008:
    https://youtu.be/xOl6PO5t6gc?si=PkpjTqEtFzrnMVr6

  8. MFS says:

    There’s a real phenomenon called the psychopath stare. Also, psychopaths don’t move their heads as much when they talk compared to “normal” people. And there are other real neurological differences in people like this, so this body language expert is on to something here.

  9. jferber says:

    I once read that a human response to an interaction with a psychopath is the same fear/discomfort/fast breathing response our ancestors had with animal predators. In other words, your brain is registering “psychopath/predator” before you can know what you’re feeling. The reason for that in ancient times, I believe, is so your flight/fight instinct activates before your thought process kicks in. I read that an emotional response take one thousandth of a second and a thought process takes 1/100th of a second. So we’re already taking defensive/protective action before our thoughts recognize the threat. That makes sense bc you are more likely to survive if you take quick action before your thought processes kick in.

  10. jferber says:

    Having said that, I could totally see myself being caught in this woman’s web.

  11. LAR says:

    Did she get her eyelids done? or is it just the angle of her head?