VF: A source close to Prince Harry said he was ‘properly admitted to the US’

Prince Harry’s immigration/residency status was once again in the news this week after a federal judge authorized a more thorough release of Harry’s visa records. Harry permanently moved to the United States in March 2020, during Donald Trump’s first term, but that didn’t stop the Heritage Foundation from waging a two-year harassment campaign to “force” the Biden administration into releasing Harry’s records. Heritage thought that once Trump was back, his administration would be more forthcoming. Trump’s DHS wasn’t playing Heritage’s game though, and neither was the judge. The document dump was just page after page of black-out records. The DHS lawyers made it clear: there’s nothing untoward happening here and Heritage needs to let this go. Heritage Foundation douchebags reacted by throwing a tantrum and demanding that Harry “self-deport.”

Throughout all of this, it’s worth noting that Harry hasn’t said anything about Heritage’s “case,” nor are Harry’s lawyers involved in any way – this has purely been about Heritage vs. two administrations’ DHS lawyers. Well, Vanity Fair claims that they have a “source close to Harry,” and that source has some idea of how Harry feels about Heritage’s harassment and the “threats” of deportation.

On Tuesday, the Department of Homeland Security released documents related to Prince Harry’s immigration status and the Heritage Foundation’s quest to make his visa-application records public under the Freedom of Information Act. The documents contain private declarations from three DHS officers who had reviewed Harry’s records, as well as the transcript of a hearing with Judge Carl Nichols about the matter. However, they redact all details about the Duke of Sussex’s immigration status and the type of visa he has, with one of the DHS officials stating there was no evidence that Harry received special treatment from the government.

A source close to the duke says the documents show he was properly admitted to the US.

“Allegations that Prince Harry received preferential treatment during his US immigration process were unequivocally dismissed today by the Trump administration,” the source tells Vanity Fair. “Furthermore, the redactions in the case further weaken the Heritage Foundation’s claim that the duke’s immigration records should be considered a matter of public interest.”

The Heritage Foundation, the conservative think tank behind the controversial Project 2025 plans that have helped guide President Donald Trump’s second term, started its quest to acquire Harry’s immigration information in 2023, soon after the publication of his best-selling memoir, Spare. Their early filings in the case claim that Harry admitted to “a long history” of drug use in the memoir, alleging that this raised questions about whether the royal was properly vetted when he moved to the US in 2020 along with his wife, Meghan Markle.

Nile Gardiner, director of the Heritage Foundation’s Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom, told GB News that he was not surprised that Harry’s full application was not released. “We still do not know whether or not Prince Harry lied on his application,” Gardiner added. “The fight continues to release Prince Harry’s immigration application to the American people.”

[From Vanity Fair]

I have no idea what Heritage will do next, but it feels like they’re not done and their harassment campaign will continue in some form. But legally, is there any road left? This source close to Harry doesn’t seem to think so, and I agree that the massively redacted files seem to be the final chapter on the attempted FOIA request. That’s probably why that Heritage idiot was squealing about self-deportation too – that’s the only scam they have left.

Photos courtesy of Cover Images.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

28 Responses to “VF: A source close to Prince Harry said he was ‘properly admitted to the US’”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Tn Democrat says:

    The Heritage Foundation will never stop. I hope Harry figures out some way to sue all these dumb f#ckers into oblivion because these rightwingers influencing politicsand the media is the bane of civilization. Keep earning that money while the left behinds seethe, Good Prince Henry!

    • Bren says:

      They would love for Harry to sue them for harassment. That’s the only way to keep this going and it could open the door for more discovery. Harry ignoring them is the only right thing to do.

  2. lanne says:

    British royals give me the creeps. They are like Scientology and Jehovahs Witnesses and death cults all wrapped together. I’m certain that Diana would have never known a moment’s peace for the rest of her life had she not been killed. The institution has a stranglehold on its primary members, and I feel so sorryu for the Wales kids. I hope they buy into the system for their own sake.

    At least Harry and Meghan had each other, unlike his mother. And I love it for the royals that all of their shennanigans only strengthened the bond the Sussexes have between them. Only a couple truly in love could survive all of this trauma. That’s why they will be the only story worth remembering about the post Elizabeth royals.

  3. Mads says:

    I’ve always thought this was more of a fishing expedition to find out which visa Harry has; the drug reasoning being a smokescreen.

    If he’s there on a diplomatic/Head of State they’ll claim it’s invalid because he’s no longer a working royal (forget logic here, because Heritage certainly has left that behind). They will never stop harassing him.

    That’s why I hope he’s on the EB-5 visa and nothing related to his connection to the institution.

    • maisie says:

      He’s automatically entitled to an A-1 Head of State visa regardless of whether he’s a “working royal”. He holds a diplomatic passport, he’s the son of the king. that visa is virtually unrestricted. that’s the reason that the State Dept blacked everything out, and why Trump has said he won’t deport him.

      these have been granted to Saudi and Jordanian princes who’ve studied at US universities, too.

  4. Advisor2U says:

    One sentence in a clickbait article, without any specifics or name, isn’t proof that anyone near prince Harry gave VF any thee. Besides, why would anyone near Harry talk now that it seems that the case has gone nowhere? What good would talking now do for him?
    Can we stop talking about this visa thing?

  5. aquarius64 says:

    As usual the source is anonymous but the rags have throw this out to save face and not lose readers for ginning up this 2 plus year non trovesy.

  6. AlexandraS says:

    The case is closed. The Heritage Foundation will be allowed to delve into Harry’s private application as this would set a dangerous precedent Nile Gardiner, Dan Wootton and Angela Levin were all enraged that the Heritage Foundation’s case turned out to be a big nothing-burger.

    So now, they have resorted to saying “Harry should leave because he hates America and hates Trump.” This is all being done to rile up the MAGA dummies who, sadly, are taking the bait and aiming their arrows at Harry. All sanctioned by the Palace and British media who are LIVID that MEGHAN continues to thrive. Nile Gardiner was discovered to have a secret X account that regularly bashes Meghan. Deranged!

  7. Noor says:

    unlikely that anyone in Prince Harry circle will speak to Vanity Fair.
    VF becoming tabloid like in their reportings

    • jais says:

      Yeah after that American Hustle piece, you wouldn’t think so.

    • SURE says:

      If this is a legit source then I would imagine it’s someone close to the Windsors.

    • Where'sMyTiara says:

      What I came here to say. No one connected to Harry would lick much less speak to anyone at VF, especially given their infamous connections to Camilla. Who is far likely to be the true source of this scuttlebutt.

  8. Kristen from MA says:

    He’s never going back. Even if he were to get the boot (won’t happen), he’d move to Canada or possibly a country in Africa. He’s never going back to live in the UK.

  9. Nic919 says:

    Isn’t Harry close to being able to qualify for a green card? I don’t know how it works, but he’s been in the states since 2020 and he’s married to an American citizen. It seems like he can probably get a green card soon.

    • Jan says:

      It is 5 years, Harry can apply for citizenship.
      Harry would have been able to get a green card, he has more than 5 million and employs more than 5 people.
      He is married to an American, and has lawyers to navigate his immigration status.

    • maisie says:

      as I said above, he’s entitled to the A-1 Head of State visa that has no restrictions on working or studying. so he would not need a green card. I do not think it includes a path to citizenship, but that visa is basically a permanent golden ticket.

      it’s the highest level of visa that the US grants. A-1 visas are given to people with diplomatic passports, but the Head of State designation is reserved for presidents, sovereigns, and their families. he doesn’t have to be a “working” member to get it.

    • bubblegum dreams says:

      Harry has a green card. Depending on what visa he came in on, if you are married to a US citizen you get a green card as soon as your application for permanent residency is approved.
      Foreign spouses of American citizens can apply for citizenship after 2 years if they are sponsored by the American citizen spouse.
      So they know nothing about what visa he has, whether Meghan was his sponsor, whether he came in on an E visa or as a foreign employee of an American business.

      • Lily says:

        Harry wouldn’t need a green card or even need to apply for permanent resident status. The A-1 Head of State visa is not a path to a green card or to citizenship. It’s a thing of its own, a visa that is unlimited in purpose and in duration. He would only need one qualification for an A-1 but now has both of the possible qualifications. He’s a member of a foreign ruling family, and is still a Counselor of State.

  10. Maxine Branch says:

    Vanity Fair? Doubt anyone close to the Sussexes would speak to them and if they did pretty sure the Sussexes would move beyond them. Anonymous sources once again raises its head.

  11. Eurydice says:

    VF doesn’t need “a source close to Harry” to tell them he was properly admitted into the US. The DHS and judges have been saying the same thing for 2 years.

  12. Jan says:

    Even The NY Times said, it would’ve been illegal to release anyone’s immigration documents.

  13. Amy Bee says:

    The fact that the Heritage Foundation is calling for Harry to self-deport means they know they can’t go any further. I’m going to guess that the source close to Harry is a royal reporter.

  14. Deborah1 says:

    Nile Gardiner writes for the Daily Mail (of course) and today they are bragging:

    ‘Has Prince Harry finally met his match? The US think tank that is doggedly trying to find out if he lied about his past drug use on his visa form is ‘well funded’ and has a ‘top-notch’ legal team, say royal experts on PALACE CONFIDENTIAL’

    Well-funded by whom? That needs to be investigated.

    • Catherine says:

      IMO. They are being funded by the Daily Mail and the mail has the consent of BP to push this story. They are not actually trying to get Harry deported; they just want to harass him. They just want to harass him. They are the one who have most aggressively pursued this story. And the fact that the Mail is now trying to boost the Heritage Foundation seems like proof of that. Even the Murdoch owned Times seems to have stepped back from the story.

    • Eurydice says:

      Well, the Heritage Foundation is a 501-c3 non-profit educational organization. So, its funding would be from grants and donations. Nile Gardiner is the director of a project within HF, whose purpose is to strengthen the ties between the US and UK. I suppose, technically, someone could challenge HF as to whether Gardiner’s witch hunt is a proper use of foundation money in achieving its mission.

    • Blogger says:

      Ummmm…it’s a one-sided match if Harry is not a party to their action.

      “Look at us Harry! We hate you ! We hate you! Sue us!”