Last September, Prince Harry had tea with his father. It was the first time father and son had seen each other since February 2024, and it seemed like a real thaw took place that month and in the months that followed. In December, we learned that Harry had once again requested that the Home Office do a risk assessment on whether or not he (and his wife and children) deserved automatic police protection when they were in the UK. The Home Office agreed to the risk assessment. That’s when things started to get dicey. In January, someone leaked that Harry believed that the assessment would obviously be “automatic security” and that the announcement or decision would be announced any day now. We’re coming up on Easter and no announcement has been made. So what’s going on? Well, this curious piece appeared in the Telegraph:
Home Office officials are trying to block the Duke and Duchess of Sussex from being given taxpayer-funded security over fears of a public backlash. The Royal and VIP Executive Committee (Ravec), which authorises security for senior members of the Royal family on behalf of the Home Office, is assessing whether or not to reinstate security provision for Prince Harry and his wife, Meghan.
Civil servants from the Home Office, the Cabinet Office and the Foreign Office who sit on the committee are understood to oppose granting the couple taxpayer-funded protection whenever they are in the UK because it would carry too much political risk.
A full risk assessment is under way, but a decision has not yet been made. However, a Home Office source told The Telegraph there was a split in the ranks. The source said: “There is nervousness among certain members of the committee who fear a public backlash. The political side believe there is too much political risk while the police and security chiefs believe that he absolutely must have it due to the extant threat.”
A spokesman for the Duke declined to comment, but there were believed to be concerns in his camp that the decision would “again be influenced by politics” rather than security and “the realities of the situation”.
Last year, he lost a legal challenge in which he had argued that he was entitled to an official risk assessment to determine the threat level against him. His last full risk analysis was in April 2019, when he was deemed such a target that he was put in the highest risk category. The Duke described his court defeat as a “good old-fashioned establishment stitch-up” and blamed the royal household for influencing the decision to reduce his protection.
Ravec’s members include a chairman, whose identity The Telegraph has been asked not to reveal, Sir Clive Alderton, the King’s private secretary, and representatives from the Prince of Wales’s household, the Metropolitan Police, the Home Office, the Cabinet Office and the Foreign Office.
The Duke, who lives in Florida, is next due in Britain in July for an event to start the one-year countdown to the 2026 Invictus Games, which will be held in Birmingham. He is concerned the threat against him has worsened since he left the UK. There are thought to be three Britons at large who have been jailed then released after plotting to cause him harm.
The fact that the Telegraph proudly reports that Harry lives in Florida is mind-boggling. It honestly makes me doubt the entire report. Honestly, though, I was suspicious of the lack of information and the fact that there’s been no movement (in public) about this issue for months. This makes sense though – opinion is split within RAVEC, and the committee is dragging their feet. Posing this as a “political risk” is the royal household’s attempt to pass the buck, or avoid accountability for their sh-tty decisions. Harry has said publicly that there was an establishment stitch-up, and that he’s been screwed over repeatedly by Clive Alderton (King Charles’s de facto chief-of-staff) – all of that means that if RAVEC comes out and says “it’s still no, we refuse to give police protection to Harry,” it all comes back onto the royals themselves. My question is: why is the Home Office taking the hit for the dogsh-t father?
Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Backgrid.
-
- Prince Harry departs The Royal Courts Of Justice in London, England, UK on Tuesday 20 January, 2026 after attending a court case with the Associated Newspapers Ltd (ANL) over unlawful surveillance methods.,Image: 1067655138, License: Rights-managed, Restrictions: Please credit photographer and agency when publishing as Justin Ng/UPPA/Avalon., Model Release: no, Credit line: Justin Ng/Avalon
-
- Prince Harry departs The Royal Courts Of Justice in London, England, UK on Tuesday 20 January, 2026 after attending a court case with the Associated Newspapers Ltd (ANL) over unlawful surveillance methods.,Image: 1067655259, License: Rights-managed, Restrictions: Please credit photographer and agency when publishing as Justin Ng/UPPA/Avalon., Model Release: no, Credit line: Justin Ng/Avalon
-
- Prince Harry departs The Royal Courts Of Justice in London, England, UK on Wednesday 21 January, 2026 after attending a court case with the Associated Newspapers Ltd (ANL) over unlawful surveillance methods.,Image: 1068018776, License: Rights-managed, Restrictions: Please credit photographer and agency when publishing as Justin Ng/UPPA/Avalon., Model Release: no, Credit line: Justin Ng/Avalon
-
- Prince Harry departs The Royal Courts Of Justice in London, England, UK on Wednesday 21 January, 2026 after attending a court case with the Associated Newspapers Ltd (ANL) over unlawful surveillance methods.,Image: 1068018822, License: Rights-managed, Restrictions: Please credit photographer and agency when publishing as Justin Ng/UPPA/Avalon., Model Release: no, Credit line: Justin Ng/Avalon
-
- Prince Harry departs The Royal Courts Of Justice in London, England, UK on Wednesday 21 January, 2026 after attending a court case with the Associated Newspapers Ltd (ANL) over unlawful surveillance methods.,Image: 1068018833, License: Rights-managed, Restrictions: Please credit photographer and agency when publishing as Justin Ng/UPPA/Avalon., Model Release: no, Credit line: Justin Ng/Avalon
-
- London, UNITED KINGDOM – Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex, was seen leaving the Royal Courts of Justice after the start of his legal appeal against a High Court ruling on his security arrangements in the UK. Pictured: Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex BACKGRID USA 8 APRIL 2025 BYLINE MUST READ: Zak Hussein / BACKGRID USA: +1 310 798 9111 / usasales@backgrid.com UK: +44 208 344 2007 / uksales@backgrid.com *UK Clients – Pictures Containing Children Please Pixelate Face Prior To Publication*
-
- London, UNITED KINGDOM Prince Harry arrives at the Royal Court of Justice for the start of the trial against publishers of the Daily Mail newspaper over alleged unlawful information gathering dating back 30 years. Pictured: Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex BACKGRID USA 19 JANUARY 2026 BYLINE MUST READ: Zak Hussein / BACKGRID USA: +1 310 798 9111 / usasales@backgrid.com UK: +44 208 344 2007 / uksales@backgrid.com *UK Clients – Pictures Containing Children Please Pixelate Face Prior To Publication*
-
- London, UNITED KINGDOM Prince Harry arrives at the Royal Court of Justice for the trial against publishers of the Daily Mail newspaper over alleged unlawful information gathering dating back 30 years Pictured: Prince Harry BACKGRID USA 21 JANUARY 2026 BYLINE MUST READ: Charlie Pycraft / BACKGRID USA: +1 310 798 9111 / usasales@backgrid.com UK: +44 208 344 2007 / uksales@backgrid.com *UK Clients – Pictures Containing Children Please Pixelate Face Prior To Publication*
-
- London, UNITED KINGDOM Prince Harry was spotted arriving at the Royal Courts of Justice for the fourth day of the high-profile Daily Mail trial, which has attracted widespread attention. Pictured: Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex BACKGRID USA 22 JANUARY 2026 BYLINE MUST READ: J.A. / BACKGRID USA: +1 310 798 9111 / usasales@backgrid.com UK: +44 208 344 2007 / uksales@backgrid.com *UK Clients – Pictures Containing Children Please Pixelate Face Prior To Publication*
Is it just me, or is the claim of a potential political backlash only further proof that harry NEEDS the protection? If he’s such a divisive figure that the thought of protecting him would piss people off, then maybe he needs protection from those people, right? Or is that too obvious an observation?
It says it right in the article! The POLITICIANS are against Harry getting security. The people who actually work in the security sector all agree he needs protection. I love how they keep ignoring that all Harry asked for was to be able to pay for his security himself. The fact that his own country won’t share with his security team any of the threats they are aware of is insane. You are basically putting up a giant flashing sign that says, “Come kill Harry here!”
In case you’re really dumb, we’ll go ahead and put in this article the next time Harry will be visiting the U.K., so you can super be sure to come kill him here! We promise, we won’t stop you!
/rant
It’s disturbing that some of the decision makers would rather have the Sussex family attacked than trying to protect them. Losing political points has nothing to do with making sure people are safe.
You know what would create backlash? something happening to Harry on British soil that could have been prevented with appropriate security. Diana’s death did serious damage to the monarchy. Are they so blind and in such a bubble that they can’t imagine the damage to the monarchy if something were to happen to HER SON because they refused to provide security????
And anyway, this story just proves Harry’s point. It’s not about the actual security risk, its about “politics” and “appearances.” The question should be – does he need the security he’s requesting, full stop. Who cares about “backlash.”
If Prince Harry and his family do not get RAVEC protection reinstated it falls completely on the King and Heir who gave the order.. while still having the royal who 🍇 trafficked children and women and trades state secrets is under full rpo protection. These people are all in the Epstein camp and compromised beyond redemption.
I mean, it doesn’t get much more clear than Andrew hiding in the back seat while his RPOs drove him back home after he’s sprung from jail.
It’s unbelievable to me that William has a representative on RAVEC. All that batsh*t crazy man can do is brief the press about how much he hates his brother, all day, every day. Every single day, there is a new article in the British media about how William is going to strip everything he possibly can from Harry when he is finally king. Charles isn’t much better.
You’ve got a serious problem, U.K. I don’t know how any person with a legitimate security concern can feel safe visiting your country when this kangaroo court made up of representatives from the king and William is allowed to make the decisions for high value targets. It’s DEEPLY unserious, and absurd. The fact that no one can imagine the fallout if something were to happen to Harry, Meghan, or the kids is baffling. This has all happened before. YOU WERE ALL THERE. JFC, what a total joke.
The only logical conclusion is King Charles and Prince William, your current and future head of state, do not care if the Sussex family is murdered. Really sit with that.
Andrew hasn’t had rpos in several years. The queen paid for security then Charles. Then Charles cut off payment or threatened to. It was all covered on here.
RPOs were present the day he was arrested and they drove him to and from the police station.
So someone is paying for his RPOs.
It’s mind boggling. Since it’s in Birmingham then can’t the city of Birmingham give the Sussexes police protection? The city bid on having Invictus so they must want it there.It seems like the Invictus Foundation wouldn’t want to have it in the UK if they can’t provide armed security.
They shouldn’t have the Invictus Games in Birmingham UK because of this mess. Giving IG to Bulliam or Maga loving Mike Tindall would run the org into the ground.
” My question is: why is the Home Office taking the hit for the dogsh-t father?”
I know I’m quoting a TV show and not anything someone actually said, but the crown must win. At the end of the day regardless of which side of the aisle these people purport to stand on, in the establishment the fact that they’re a monarchy means that their wants and desires have to be prioritized.
I’m sure that over the years there have been members of parliament that wanted to investigate Andrew, had an issue with the financial sketchiness of Charles, had concerns about how compromised William could be, wanted to impose more restrictions on the media’s intrusion and illegality, but at the end of the day it hasn’t happened. Not to a large scale, because of the influence of that family and their courtiers.
I wonder why though (the crown must win). The monarch holds no real power anymore. They’re a figurehead. So, why are the citizens and government so afraid of putting some leashes on them? It’s out of control.
The way they’ve phrased this, blaming “Home Office officials” as though it weren’t these same officials (via the actual Home Secretary) who instigated the new round of investigations and assessment into Harry’s security which he had long been denied, is SO obvious and disingenuous.
It is far more likely that William’s people (and perhaps even Charles’ people) on RAVEC are indicating that they do NOT want Harry (and of course Meghan) to receive automatic security when they return to the UK, but are deliberately leaking to their friends in the media that it is the government who will be blocking it. They are not as clever as they think.
The thing is, the minute their security becomes “automatic”, those KP and BP people will cease to get advance knowledge of Harry’s plans to visit the UK, so they will have nothing to leak, and no way of giving Kate and William especially the heads-up so that they can plan busy-work around Harry’s public engagements.
As someone pointed out online, this would have been believable had it been a Tory government in power, because they have been doing the palaces’ bidding for years, but the Labour government has at least appeared to be more receptive towards the idea of the Sussexes’ visiting and willing to concede that they are deserving of security in much the same way that other high profile targets who visit the UK are.
It’s as we said: even if (when!) the assessment reveals the very real need for the Sussexes to have security, RAVEC, thanks to the palace lackeys on the committee, will find a way to deny them this protection.
The Duke who lives in Florida took me out. I was like who? Anyways, yeah idk. I’m a pessimist so I don’t have high hopes but I hope I’m wrong.
Lots of wealthy Brits have second homes in Florida. My guess was that whatever doofus wrote this just assumed Brit in America meant Florida. Europeans can be very shaky on US geography. Florida and California aren’t basically the same thing, right?
Both have palm trees, beaches, sure. 😉
The only “backlash that they will receive “ is from Peg the evil incandescent bald demon!!! That’s their problem they don’t want to piss off the future king they couldn’t give two shits if something horrible happened to Harry in the UK without protection. That’s just what the future king hopes will happen something horrible for his brother!!!
Hmm…it’s more likely that the Palace officials are the ones being obstacles. I believe that the first story was leaked by the Palace. I’m with Kaiser that the Telegraph writing that Harry lives in Florida puts a lot of doubt in the entire story. I think the Telegraph was priming the public to be outraged from the beginning. RAVEC still has to explain why Andrew continues to have security.
Exactly. Who in the palace is still trying to prevent security & trying to instigate backlash against it? Because why would the home office bother initiating a review only to turn around & say there would be backlash.
In January it seemed pretty set from the press that Harry would get security & the press said decision would come in January. Tabloids & royalists like Jennie bond were justifying why Harry would deserve it & saying it would pave way for Charles reunion with the Californian based grandchildren. the press were already planning their desired photo ops. So what has changed?
And this article suggests that Harry’s point that security decisions haven’t been based on his risk assessment is correct. The police & certain officials are saying his risk profile demands security. So that should be only thing that matters & it’s actually dangerous to suggest otherwise. What’s to stop them preventing appropriate security for a high profile figure eg Green Party leader Zack Polanski or Tony Blair if there were threats against them but because it would be unpopular with uk tabloids?
yeah, that picture of Andrew being driven home from JAIL by his RPOs is going to be a little problematic for the palace in more ways than one.
It should be very problematic. Bc who is paying for Andrew to have RPO’s? The taxpayers? Charles? And yet they’re worried about the backlash for protecting the king’s grandchildren. It does not add up.
Indeed, because, as Jais mentioned, WHO is paying for Andrew’s security? It can’t be Charles “paying privately”, as the media dutifully reported, because the same media (and the court) also said that Harry could NOT pay privately “because it was not allowed”. So which is it?
The double standards are glaring, and I hope that the public continue to pick away at this particular issue and press their politicians to explain the discrepancy in the treatment between the two.
Charles leaked that he was paying for Andrew’s security when he was still living at Royal Lodge, so I think the ship has sailed on one standard for whoever the king and his incandescent with anger heir want to receive security, and Harry and his family. The king wanted it known that he wasn’t making the public pay for Prince Andrew, so be it. We see who you don’t want protected, and it’s grotesquely your own son’s family, including very small children. But the pedophile’s going to be a-okay. Fantastic.
Charles is paying for private security not rpos. It’s been that way for years. The queen paid before that. Though some reports say Charles stopped paying and it’s on Andrew. But he does not have rpos. It’s all been widely covered. It was estimated at gpb3 million and Charles was using it as leverage at one point.
The British media in multiple papers referred to them as RPOs. They did not call them security.
It probably would be police security taking him too and from the police station, but no protection the rest of the time. It does seem that the media stirs up hatred of people and then complains when they get protection.
If Ravic or whomever denies security as automatic, then the compromise is to let Harry pay for his security and at the VERY LEAST, let Harry’s team know the current dangers.
I just cannot get over how unbearably stupidly they are acting.
Except the courts said harry could not pay. Despite the fact that Charles is paying for Andrew’s RPO security. Or if Charles is not, then the taxpayers are.
Andrew’s is private security not rpos.
@Bqm, I had thought that the crucial concerns have been allowing private security to be armed, and having access to information about threats in real time. Would you know if Andrew’s private security has the same restrictions that Harry’s does now?
Yes, BQM they’re private security. But the point still remains that if Charles can pay for that, Harry should be able to pay for his own, AND for that private security to have the exact same rights and access to police info as his uncle’s security undoubtedly has. Because there’s no way prince Nonce just has basic private security.
They aren’t private security. They totally blew that narrative up when RPOs drove Andrew home from jail, and all of the British media dutifully reported it was RPOs.
The press reported it as RPOs escorting him to and from jail. Sooooo? Idk what to say. I don’t think the press is lying that he had RPOs escorting him. That was just fact. There were too many photographers there to report otherwise. The question is who is paying for those RPOs that escorted him to and from the jail. Charles or the taxpayers? Idk if he usually has private security v RPOs or not but it mostly only matters for when he leaves royal property. And it seems he had RPOs when he was arrested. Sources can say he does not but on that day it was photographed.
Yep. A public backlash and a DM columnist/William backlash are two different things.
Why would career civil servants be worried about a political backlash? Part of the reason for their involvement (one would think) would be to minimize political decision making in favor of security and public safety. So, aside from the very obvious mistake of locating Harry in Florida, this explanation makes no sense. However, what does make sense is the presence of William’s henchmen on this committee. It’s really shocking to see how much William wants his brother unalived. He, at least, doesn’t care.
But he would “oh, woe is me” should anything happen to H. It would be all about HIS loss…and he wouldn’t be able to work ever again. He’d be forever in “mourning”.
If this story is true then we have a disgusting government and monarchy. But if who ever wrote it doesn’t know the difference between Florida and California then he knows nothing.
Right?! They are on opposite coasts.
The left behinds and rota have colluded for a decade to smear Harry and inflame the fringe lunatics. Security need is based on risk assessment and not based around the Windsors using the horror of Diana’s death due to inadequate security being used to emotionally manipulate Harry. It does not matter if Harry is a working royal or not. He is a high profile person and is at high risk because his family made him high risk. (Keener and Will-not are not working royals either. Combined counting absolute nonsense like phone calls, travel and social media posts they complete less than an “event” a day while draining tens of millions from the tax payers). Reading the bot comments on articles like is horrifying. Willy is deliberately making Invictus unsafe for Harry, the participants and attendees with his psychotic jealousy briefing while attempting to hijack the entire charity and claim it for himself. The games should be moved and everyone involved in the smear campaign should be put on blast. Will the UK be winning if Willy’s loose screws and manic leaking cause a major security breech at an international event? Willy is not a serious person and is a dangerously unhinged. He is a middle aged adult functioning with the intellectual capacity of a warped adolescent.
I agree. It’s scary and if William really is behind this craziness then he needs to be controlled. I just realized that I’ve thought and said the same thing about the 🍊one.
WOAH: “Ravec’s members include a chairman, whose identity The Telegraph has been asked not to reveal, Sir Clive Alderton, the King’s private secretary, and representatives from the Prince of Wales’s household…”
So according to this, Charles only has one man on the committee, yet William has REPRESENTATIVES (plural)??? Didn’t they originally have just one representative each? Does this mean that Simon Case is still on the committee? Has Jason Knauf joined them? Is the chairman who must not be named also one of William’s people?
Either way, it looks REALLY BAD for the UK if the security of high-level VIPs who have genuinely high-level threats against them can be decided on a whim, instead of according to threat level.
Meanwhile, there is Prince Andrew, Duke of York, with his FULL police protection, being driven to and from the police station and protected round the clock by… taxpayers… who presumably are totally fine with this, but against an innocent family under siege being protected, even though Prince Harry offered to pay for his protection. Notice how these articles all manage to wedge “taxpayer funded” into the first paragraph without mentioning his stated offer to pay his own way?
Would love to know who the chairman is. Maybe it’s Simon Case? Who knows?
These people are so incompetent, it’s probably William. Would anyone really be shocked, other than the fact that presumably he’d actually have to do some work if that was the case?
Does Andrew not have police protection?
wtf
@Rachel……exactly. The king is protecting andy….but not his son and his family. Now….. What does andy have on chuck? Because its something…. And its bad😒
He has private security paid for by other Charles or maybe it’s on Andrew now. It’s been that way for years. Same security any rich person can hire. It’s not government protection. The queen was forced to drop that after a fuss because Andrew wasn’t a working royal but was still getting rpo protection. She paid the estimated millions and then Charles.
I thought the issue was that private security can’t be armed in the UK? Only the RPO? I remember reading that Harry (understandably) wants armed security and offered to pay for it but they told him he couldn’t.
Interesting…
1) has the chairman’s name always been a secret? If not, why now?
2) they name checked C-Rex’ private secretary but not W’s representative. Again, why the secrecy for the heir? I could maybe see keeping C-Rex’ rep secret. But the heir’s? Maybe Willy Nilly has more power than we’ve been told. Is he really an informal regent like his father was & the proWilly courtiers are deferring to him more than they are to his father bc C-Rex health continues to decline? We know C-Rex can be ruthless (Diana and H&M) and W keeps pushing him, so why hasn’t he put his heir in his place?
I think the risk assessment was concluded months ago and the findings were so alarming that we were told via the tabs that Harry would likely get security, instead of RAVEC just granting it. It also looked like BP had agreed with them and the Tantrum king has been having multiple hissy fits, thus the endless foot dragging by RAVEC. They should take that same foot that they’re dragging and use it to give Willy Nilly a good swift kick in the butt. Something C-Rex should have done a long time ago, esp after teenage Will pushed Diana. A narcissistic (future) king, or narcissistic jackazz prez, who has never faced consequences for his actions, turns into a bully. An extremely powerful bully who can’t control his emotions and repeatedly lashes out indiscriminately and at the slightest “perceived” provocation, is a danger to EVERYONE, as we in the US are continually being forced to observe.
Protect your peace CBs! And virtual hugs to everyone! Not hijacking, just saying that unfortunately, things are escalating.
“they name checked C-Rex’ private secretary but not W’s representative. Again, why the secrecy for the heir? I could maybe see keeping C-Rex’ rep secret. But the heir’s? Maybe Willy Nilly has more power than we’ve been told.”
Exactly my thoughts – especially as we’re now discovering that unlike Charles, William has more than one representative on RAVEC. Why does the king only get one, but the heir more than one. How many representatives does William actually have on the committee? Why does William need to have representatives on that committee, which he apparently had long before he became the heir? I still don’t see why the royals need to have representatives on that committee at all. The committee can liaise with them re royal protection, but the fact that they sit permanently on the committee and make decisions for ALL VIPs is very odd. They could decide that anyone who is disliked by their principal does not “deserve” protection regardless of the outcome of the risk assessment, just like they are doing here with Harry.
All I can say is… William keeps poking the bear. He clearly has zero sense.
Right. The chairman wasn’t named. And. One of William’s people were named. Although Simon had been named before. I can believe that William will do anything possible to keep Harry and his family without security. And I think when he’s king it will be worse.
@Jais
William’s “power” is the psychological and physical violence he uses to terrorize his father, politicians, the media, etc.
Or at least he tries, with varying degrees of success. If William managed to fight for over two weeks with all his might to make Harry shave his beard for the wedding, throwing tantrums, repeatedly harassing the Queen, his father, and who knows who else, imagine what he’s doing and how crazy he is when it comes to matters more important to him.
After the Sandringham summit, a shocked Camila publicly stated that William had attacked Charles with such terrible fury and rage to force him to make some decisions regarding Harry, that Camila was shocked, that she had never seen anything like it in her life, that she was terrified, that William literally “hung” over the seated Charles, foaming at the mouth, roaring.
I don’t know if Charles is afraid of him, but he certainly hates confrontation, and he didn’t wait all these years for the crown to now fight this psychopath. He’s giving in to William because he wants peace and quiet. I suspect it might have been similar with Frogmore Cottage. It might also be similar with vulnerable decision-makers.
If they don’t provide security, that should be the end of the Sussexes’ visits to England. Harry should come alone for the IG and then not again.
The rota will shriek, realizing they’ve helped to kill their own prospects for interesting story content.
I doubt Harry + family will ever spend a great deal of time in the UK, so why not just give him the protection for the few times he/they are there?
It’s all just so short-sighted and petty. More serious than Frogmore Cottage, but of a piece.
I think they are telling us that William is okay with Harry and his family being killed.
Mr quiet faith is also a quiet psycho.
Simply this: if Harry cannot get police protection in the UK, then he should definitely not go to Birmingham for the Invictus Games. Why did Birmingham, England, win the games anyway? Maybe this is paranoid, but did William want the games in England and have Harry come over, only to be killed in an “accident” that no one will be accountable for? I don’t trust William one inch. He’s already said that it would give him “great satisfaction” to remove all of Harry and his family’s titles. Wouldn’t it give him even more satisfaction if Harry were gone from the Earth for eternity? Because Will is quite mad, in my opinion. And didn’t Charles already say people would get over Harry’s death in a relatively short time? And even if people don’t forget (a la Diana), if the mastermind is a king or a soon-to-be king, will anything really be done to him? The answer is King Charles himself, who never was even accused of Diana’s death. Then William will simply take over the Invictus Games, run them into the ground with his incompetence and laziness and then be supremely satisfied that he destroyed Harry and everything that was important to Harry (excluding Harry’s family, which, God forbid!)