Bond: Princess Kate will ‘feel justified’ in taking as much time off during her spring break

When the Princess of Wales stepped out on Easter Sunday, it was only her second public appearance in nearly three weeks. Kate and Prince William took all of last week off, and in the week prior, Kate had only done one solitary event, the enthronement of the Archbishop of Canterbury. In fact, for much of this year, Kate has generally just done one day of “work,” or one event a week. She’s not really burning the candle at both ends, and yet… her new Busy Thursday schedule is actually a heavier first-quarter workload than she’s ever had. That being said, old habits die hard, and after working her fingers to the nub (again, one day a week on average), Kate feels like she’s completely justified in taking a long-ass spring break.

As royal expert Jennie Bond exclusively tells the Mirror, all this will now be put aside for a few weeks so they can fulfill their other important role – being parents to their three children and enjoying precious time together.

The former BBC royal correspondent explained: “Both William and Catherine have put in quite a shift in recent weeks and months. They’ve been out and about, up and down the country. So I think they’ll feel justified in taking as much time as they can over the Easter holidays to be with their children. I know people say ‘Well, I work hard too, but I don’t get to ring-fence the school holidays’.

“But the fact is that William and Catherine have a job for life: there is no retirement age for a King and Queen. So I don’t begrudge them taking this valuable time to be with their young children as much as they can. Their holiday plans are always private, but the chances are they will spend most of their time at their home in Norfolk, Anmer Hall.

“I’m sure they’ll welcome the chance to get away from the scandal surrounding William’s disgraced uncle, Andrew – who, of course, is now living just a few miles from Anmer Hall. Meanwhile, the children will always enjoy having their granny and grandad around, and the Middletons are also very easy and welcome company for William and Catherine, who adore them.”

Jennie added: “William and Kate are sure to be encouraging their children to enjoy all the outdoor activities they love as a family: romps on the beach, long walks with the dogs, barbecues if the weather is good enough and all sorts of sports. Especially after her cancer diagnosis, the princess relishes every moment she can spend outdoors – no matter what the weather. And she has always encouraged her children to do the same. They love the wide open spaces in Norfolk, the freedom they have to explore the Sandringham estate and also to play, pretty unhindered, on the beaches.

[From The Daily Mirror]

“So I think they’ll feel justified in taking as much time as they can over the Easter holidays…” Royalists are completely delulu. It’s one thing to have the luxury of a five-to-six week spring break, it’s quite another to argue that you’re JUSTIFIED to take that kind of time off by averaging one day of work a week for roughly twelve weeks. “William and Catherine have a job for life: there is no retirement age for a King and Queen…” For fifteen years, we’ve heard variations of that excuse for their laziness too, that they don’t feel the need to work hard now because they’ll be king and queen consort, and THEN they’ll have to work hard. Which no one believes, especially considering that they plan to hide out at their emotional-support manor house Forest Lodge even then. Their big “modernizing the monarchy” plan includes “working less and tweeting out support instead of showing up.”

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Backgrid and Cover Images.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

59 Responses to “Bond: Princess Kate will ‘feel justified’ in taking as much time off during her spring break”

  1. Tessa says:

    George is almost as tall as his mother. They are not young children anymore. Though the spin is they are an average family. Average families need to work for a living.

  2. Well another article white washing laziness.

  3. Tessa says:

    The children down the road might want to spend more time with their friends.

  4. Dee(2) says:

    “Both William and Catherine have put in quite a shift in recent weeks and months” doing what? Going to the BAFTAs? To Borough Market? Sitting in the pews at church? This is stuff that people do outside of going to work. You would go to the theater, outside of going to work. You go shopping, outside of going to work. You go to Church, Mosque, Temple, outside of work.

    It’s really a smack in the face to pretend that they do anything even encompassing the nonsense that is Royal work, let alone actual work that people need to do to survive. They are so terminally lazy that I just cannot believe that they’re not raising incredibly lazy kids too. How can you watch your parents do nothing all day, always be available to vacation, always be available to go to every single event, always be at home and somehow think that they are hard workers?

    • Becks1 says:

      This is the thing for me. We can debate whether what they do is actually work.

      But Will and Kate don’t even do the bare minimum of royal work. Being chauffeured around and shaking hands is too much for them. A dozen engagements means they get to take a month off.

      Normal people don’t get those breaks. Other royals don’t get those breaks.

  5. Me at home says:

    These aren’t tiny little children anymore. They’ll have their own friends and interests.

    It’s starting to feel like the Middleton smother-and-control approach to family management. And yes, a convenient shield for laziness.

  6. YankeeDoodles says:

    This was cute when George was a newborn. It was cute when Charlotte was a newborn. As soon as Meghan came on the scene, it began to look…. Less cute. When Meghan and Harry announced their engagement, and WanK announced they were expecting a baby the same autumn, it was… a bit like a weird competition. That would have been a perfect time to knuckle down to the day job. Not to take a step back. I can believe Kate was genuinely “going through something,” whether it was postpartum anguish, infidelity, etc….. none of that would be novel, in the grander scheme of things. All of it happens to a lot of us. But why she had to conceive this hideous grudge against Meghan, is beyond me. It’s unhinged. She could have found salvation in some good work, with good people. She still could. What does she *do* all day???

    • Tessa says:

      Keen was and is jealous of meghan. She was longer center of attention. Harry was third wheel and keen would get flirty with him. Now keen saw that harry and Meghan were a love match unlike her own marital situation
      Scooter did not want harry to marry Meghan and this suited keen just fine.

    • Unblinkered says:

      Agree with you both above.
      For me, it’s always been a simple case of a plainer insecure woman’s jealousy of a new better looking female arriving on the scene. Not just better looking, but confident and genuinely hardworking – a self-made millionairess who was liked immensely by the Queen and the Duke from the get-go.
      KM’s behaviour to Meghan was abhorrent, and she’ll never know any peace of mind until she apologises. Publically.

      • HuffnPuff says:

        Exactly, Unblinkered! Kate doesn’t have any friends or much staff because she views all women as competition. The only woman she isn’t threatened by is the nanny. I don’t think she even likes her own sister. That had to have upset her when Pippa’s backside was the headline instead of Kate’s wedding. And I agree. She needs to make peace but I don’t see that ever happening. There’s no way Kate is going to let Meghan back into the fold. Meghan is smarter and more capable than Kate and Kate knows it. She likes being the only fish in a little pond.

      • kelleybelle says:

        I agree absolutely. It truly slays me how she can a cross around her neck with her mistreatment and coldness to Meghan. Meghan is everything that Kate is not, and that’s the RF’s issue. Meghan puts them all to shame.

    • convict says:

      It was never cute for the British taxpayers.

  7. Brassy Rebel says:

    They can’t retire? Really? I thought they already were. 🤔

  8. Hypocrisy says:

    I was babysitting young children when I was George’s age so no they are definitely not young or babies by a long shot they need to stop acting like they are infants or toddlers. As for Waity feeling like she is entitled to month long holidays six times a year, of course she does because exactly who is going to hold her accountable? Not the government, press or people they don’t hold any of these leftover parasites accountable for anything even committing financial and/or violently heinous crimes. They are just a burden the subjects are forced to bear it’s time to end the subsidies for the rich and the BRF cost the taxpayers over half a billion pounds a year and bring nothing but hate filled headlines anymore.. they no longer work because their only focus is holidays and hating the Sussex’s or some other family members.

  9. jais says:

    Sorry, Jennie Bond. When they work 1, at most 2 days a week, only on some weeks the sympathy is just not there.

  10. Blujfly says:

    Neither of them has ever felt the need to justify any of their time off. Not working is their default mode and the majority of their royal “career.”

  11. Inge says:

    Romps on the beach? That reminds me of the dogging rumours.

    • Me at home says:

      Brace yourselves for another collection of informal family photos that we’ll be seeing until March 2027.

      That is, if Willy and Kate are even vacationing together.

  12. Becks1 says:

    I can’t believe Jennie Bond wrote this with a straight face. Did anyone ever say of Charles when he was the PoW that he was entitled to 6 months of vacations a year?

    I do think the fact that there is justification being put out for another vacation is interesting bc it tells me that the palace is aware of the criticism. Here, we have all the highlights – “young children,” “future king and queen” and “CANCER.”

    So someone at KP knows this is a bad look but what can they do to force William or Kate to work more? Or to at least be more subtle about the vacations.

    • LRB says:

      The issue for me is not a comparison with Charles – he was at the other extreme where the children with only one parent never seemed a priority for him between Camilla and work. The comparison is with their future subjects – most of whom these days have two working parents ( even if one parent WFH or part time) and they juggle school holidays . They are simply so out of touch.

      • Becks1 says:

        He was at the other extreme which is something that William has taken and run with as an excuse. He hasn’t even pretended to find “balance,” he’s just flat out not working.

        And the other thing is what we’re discussing in the other thread – he’s not working but he’s also just not interested in the work that he does. He’s uninformed, he’s uninterested, etc. Things that can’t be said about Charles.

  13. Amy Bee says:

    What will be the excuse when the children reach of age and William and Kate are still not working?

    • Debbie says:

      “Cancer.” As it says in the article above, if you don’t like the “young kids” excuse, there’s always the vague something-something “cancer” card, it always shuts people up.

    • Blujfly says:

      She’ll be assisting her aged parents. When they are gone, she will need to be a hands-on grandmother.

  14. lady digby says:

    Since 2016 when they supposedly became fultime working royals, Wilbur’s yearly totals are as follows: 188, 171,220,220,153,223,125,175, 166 and last year 202.
    Kate yearly totals are as follows: 63,87,126,126,135,90,134, 13 and 68 .( Maternity leave and sick leave obviously meant time off during certain years and also Kate is Consort to the future monarch and currently PoW ) At no time has either hit the gold standard of 500 engagements a year as established by Will’s grandparents.
    Same decade Charles apart from lockdown years and 2024 cancer treatment performed well over 500 in his role as PoW and then King.

    • Becks1 says:

      When you see those numbers laid out like that……it’s appalling. How are they not embarrassed by their laziness??

    • Mayp says:

      Do you remember as well that many of those “engagements” for Kate were just phone calls…..

      • BeanieBean says:

        And going to church, tennis matches, soccer & rugby, airport meet & greets. Wait til she starts counting reading her emails. 🙄

    • Debbie says:

      It does no good to compare WanK’s hours to each other’s. The real test would be to compare their yearly hours to the elderly royal’s hours, especially the ones with cancer as well, or those who were hospitalized with a head injury but resumed their engagements before their bruises healed. Then, the true picture of their contributions would be revealed.

      • Becks1 says:

        She’s not “comparing” them to each other, she’s presenting them as data points against the “gold standard” of the 500 engagements a year. Even in 2024 I think Charles clocked something like 300 or 350 engagements (when he was also battling cancer.) So when you see that Kate has never broken 200 and William barely has in only a few years – you get a sense of how little they work.

      • Lorelei says:

        She probably counts each individual shamrock as its own engagement

    • Hypocrisy says:

      Numbers don’t lie…and those numbers are shockingly low 😳🤯

      • MsThang says:

        I swear sometimes the powers that be, act like they are at these engagements all day, when they are there no more than 15 to 40 minutes a pop, but Diana called it sheer slog and I do realize that they are incredibly boring sometimes.

    • Dee(2) says:

      The really disgusting part when you see the numbers laid out like this, is that with it being 365 days in the year, these numbers are still ridiculously low not counting the fact that they will do multiple” engagements” per day.

      So let’s just say for each day she ” worked” last year Kate did 2 engagements that day. That still only 34/365 days. That’s a little more than a month of work? How can you honestly justify taking off 11 months of the year because you have ” small children” and cancer that has been in remission for almost 18 months?

      • Lady Digby says:

        The Republic website on a weekly basis should analyse the previous week’s Court Circular printed daily in The Times and breakdown it down into how much each “working royal” is or isn’t working. The King has details of who and where he is meeting but Wilbur sometimes states he held a meeting at St James Palace without any further detail of who and which organisation was involved?! Based on 500 being the gold standard for a senior royal to undertake per year even if you combine PoWs numbers together, they still fall well short of 500!! Also factor in the length and substance of their engagements eg turning up empty handed for twenty minutes to a Foodbank!? Facts are your friends and the republic movement need to brandish these receipts as proof of how little the PoWs have worked over a decade as “full time senior royals.”

  15. Jensa says:

    Royals don’t retire? They’re already retired!
    The rest of us (in the UK) have to work to age 67 or later. And a working day for us doesn’t mean a couple of hours fannying about at Borough Market or turning up at a posh dinner where everything is laid on for you. People with children still have to work. People with (actual, real) cancer too.
    They’re taking the piss.

    • kelleybelle says:

      The way they coddle and infantilize this woman is becoming quite blatant. I’m still laughing about her comment to a bystander about how she too “struggles to find time to exercise.” A bald-faced lie because she has all the time in the world. She does it fanatically … like many others with eating disorders. And Kate isn’t “slender.” She is seriously underweight.

  16. Ang says:

    I don’t understand how what little they do is even considered “work”. Neither would last until lunch break in a “real” job.

  17. QuiteContrary says:

    What do they DO all day long? Seriously?

    Kate, I’m guessing, exercises for a few hours a day. But then what? And what does William do? Ride his scooter? Play video games? Rant on football forums?

    How are they not bored as hell???

  18. KC2 says:

    Nothing says Easter joy and spring like beige.

    This is a small complaint, but why does never switch out the belts on these outfits? Using the same cheesy one that the suit comes with is so bland. She could have used something else for a more polished look.

  19. jferber says:

    B-tch has always felt justified in doing whatever the f-ck she wants. And she mostly wants to take vacations and do no royal duties. It’s always been this way. And her lazy husband has always been on board with this. He’s a taker, not a giver. He will never change and Great Britain will suffer bc of his hideous reign.

  20. Kim says:

    Oof, she is definitely not getting the Photoshop treatment any longer. Those two close-up photos are something else.

    • BeanieBean says:

      The squinting into the sun ones, yes. It’s OK to wear sunglasses, I don’t know why they don’t carry them. I never go anywhere without sunglasses, even on cloudy days.

      • convict says:

        Oh, they do wear sunglasses, even when it is rude to do so. But the protocol is to not wear them around the public and the public gets ignored if they wear sunglasses. 😎

  21. YankeeDoodles says:

    This is where a few extra pounds would do Kate a big favour. Someone said, I think it might have been Kate Moss, when you get to a certain age, you have to choose between your face and your ass. Better face, bigger ass. It is what it is. When you’re too thin, everything sags. IMO, Kate never looked better than — ironically — at Meghan’s wedding, when she was clearly seething and resentful. But she looked stunning. That was just after child no. 3. Add thirty pounds, she’d look fifteen years younger. And her hair would come back. It’s ….sad. Really, she’s a horrible person, but she needs help.

    • C-Shell says:

      Can attest. I’ll be 74 in June. On purpose, I’ve lost 40 pounds over the past year and a half. I’m scrawny but still look better than Kate. Pilates helps. Still, there’s no fighting the loose skin and flat ass that comes with that.

      You’re right. She looked her best around the time of the H/M wedding, bitch that she is.

    • convict says:

      It was the French actress, Catherine Deneauve.

  22. Over it says:

    Well Jenny might not begrudge them but I do . Get off your lazy azzz and go do some work. You get millions a year to do f all . Millions from tax paying people who do actually have to work to support your lazy behinds .These tax paying people also have children that they can’t take weeks off every 6 weeks to be with or they would find themselves unemployed

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment