The usual suspects are doing the most to sabotage Birmingham’s Invictus Games

In recent years, the anti-Sussex factions in the press have been quite clear: they’re gunning for the Invictus Games, and they’ll do anything to take down Invictus to “ruin” Prince Harry. It’s also been perfectly clear for years that this is Prince William’s goal as well, although I think William would actually prefer to have Invictus still exist, and then William can insert himself as the “royal patron.” But who knows – these people are more than willing to lie about Invictus, to harass veterans and target Invictus sponsors, all in an attempt to “put Harry in his place” and destroy yet another brilliant initiative founded by Harry. In July, Harry is due to visit Birmingham, England for the “One Year To Go” Invictus events. Well, because the games will be held on English soil, the British press is already doing the most to sabotage them. The Mail’s Richard Eden has a very Harry-centered exclusive about how Birmingham Invictus’ vice chair has quit. Tom Sykes’ Royalist Substack immediately picked up on Eden’s exclusive, and Sykes laid out the game plan for taking down Invictus:

A distinguished vice chairman has quit the board of Invictus after just 16 months, while four senior communications and marketing roles remain unfilled with barely 14 months to go to Prince Harry’s 2027 games.

Meanwhile my colleague Paula Froelich has reported that the biggest historical sponsor to the Games, Boeing, has jetted away, while the swollen budget for the whole thing means Invictus Games Birmingham 2027 is not exactly shaping up to be a triumphant homecoming for Prince Harry.

Let’s start with the high level departure. Melloney Poole, vice chairman of the Birmingham 2027 board of trustees, has resigned, according to a report by Richard Eden of the Daily Mail. Poole is one of the most experienced figures in the British charity world. She played a key role at the Heritage Lottery Fund, chaired the board of governors for the Regional Committee of the National Lottery Charities Board, and currently chairs the Florence Nightingale Foundation.

Most significantly, in 2015 the Ministry of Defence asked her to set up and run the Armed Forces Covenant Fund — the very heartland of the military charity sector that Invictus claims as its patch. She duly did so, and it is now an independent charitable trust.

Getting Poole, a lawyer, on board with Invictus in December 2024 to deliver the 2027 games was a genuine coup. Losing her barely sixteen months later, with the Games still over a year away, suggests there are real problems in the organisation.

A spokesman for Invictus tells the Mail Melloney “decided to step down to focus on her other interests — not least the Florence Nightingale Foundation,” adding that her “extensive leadership experience” had been “instrumental” in establishing the foundations for next year’s Games.

I’m sure it was. But people of Melloney Poole’s calibre and commitment do not walk away from prestigious board positions before the job is done on a whim, or due to bad personal time planning.

A LinkedIn post by Ritchie Rebbeck, the Games’ director of communications, reveals that Birmingham 2027 is still actively recruiting for a Communications Manager, Digital Manager, Communications Executive and a Marketing Manager—aka a large part of the comms and marketing operation!

The event seems to be running out of time to get the British public to care. But you cannot build a public profile when you haven’t hired the team to build it. This is basic stuff, and the fact that this team isn’t in place yet tells you a great deal about the state of play behind the scenes.

Which brings us to a superb piece of journalism published this week by Paula Froelich on her Substack, which is required reading for anyone following the Invictus story. Froelich has crunched the numbers behind Birmingham 2027 and laid them alongside the event that inspired the whole enterprise — the US Department of Defense Warrior Games.

The comparison is brutal. Froelich’s source, a UK marketing and event production professional, has worked up a total operating budget projection for Birmingham that lands at a working midpoint of £45 million, within a range of £30 million to £60 million. That covers venues and stadia at £5–10 million, event operations and staffing at £6–12 million, ceremonies and broadcasting at £3–9 million, accommodation and catering at £4–9 million, and a marketing and awareness line of £2–8 million.

[Birmingham] declared effective bankruptcy in September 2023, disclosing an £87 million budget deficit. It technically exited its Section 114 notice in February 2026, but remains financially fragile. Pouring tens of millions of pounds of public money into Harry’s pet project in a city that cannot fund its own basic services is, to put it as gently as possible, politically toxic.

So, we have a vice chair of the board heading for the exit, a comms team that hasn’t been hired, a sponsor list that’s shrunk, a budget that could hit £60 million, and a broke host city with a small but virulent Islamic extremist population. On current trends, Birmingham 2027 isn’t exactly going to rescue Harry’s reputation.

[From The Royalist Substack]

They really think that Harry is “in charge” of everything to do with Invictus, and that it’s Harry’s responsibility to: A) oversee Birmingham’s budget crisis, B) personally hand-hold Invictus sponsors, C) hire a communications team fourteen months in advance of the Birmingham games, D) personally stop vice-chairs from leaving, and E) stop providing Invictus-structured support to thousands of veterans in the name of cost-cutting. Don’t get me wrong, I think the Birmingham games are going to be a disaster too, which is why I didn’t understand why the Invictus board gave the 2027 games to the city. You know why they did though? Because the British government and Birmingham’s local government pledged a huge amount of money to support the games and the government wanted to use Invictus to expand their veterans programs. It’s about more than the games themselves, it’s about the support structure Invictus pioneered for wounded warriors. That’s why so many countries welcome Invictus and welcome Harry’s visits.

Photos courtesy of Cover Images.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

48 Responses to “The usual suspects are doing the most to sabotage Birmingham’s Invictus Games”

  1. Tessa says:

    There also seems to be a release of bots lately putting Down invict us

    • Pebbles says:

      I have definitely noticed this. Particularly on youtube but X is a problem as well

      • Julia says:

        Nonsense, if the Birmingham Games is having all these issues how come no one is talking about it apart from Eden, Sykes and that odd Paula lady. None are reliable commentators.

    • Not A Subject says:

      I think this Invictus is going to be a huge success….Bots & tabloids will be foaming at the mouth but…

      There will be so much media attention & shenanigans that the wounded warriors will get their inspirational stories heard. They’ll be supported. Anyone coming for Invictus will just look small and vicious.

    • lucy10 says:

      Way back when I commented that the Invictus Games should have pulled out of B’ham even if it meant delaying the next games to a later date. Everyone knew about the shenanigans the likes of Willie, Chuck & the Royal Rota Rats would pull to sabotage the Games, behind the scenes. And so here we are. Even at this late stage, it’s worth cancelling it & putting resources into planning the next one in South Korea in 2029, where the shady forces of Willie has no power to disrupt!

      • MelodyM says:

        May all these rats kn@ckers get absolutely everything they deserve! From the bottom on up to the very top! PS: Harry wasn’t the one that chose Birmingham…the board did. And! Harry’s rep does not need rescuing.

  2. Cassie says:

    Unfortunately the government here in Australia has pulled funding from Invictus in their latest budget .

    • Gloriana says:

      What is wrong with people? They’d rather tear down a support system for wounded veterans rather than let something PH touches survive. This is shameful, and its made me aware that there is a considerable force (obviously paying people to write things) that wants to “win” (and make the world worse to spite a few people).

      • Meme says:

        — a broke host city with a small but virulent Islamic extremist population.

        Whoa whoa whoa, what is this racist shit?
        Yes Birmingham has many islamic citizens but it’s a normal city and vast majority of them are normal people who are not extremist – this is playing straight into the “Sharia law” nonsense that fascists like Tommy Robinson spout. Come out and say what you mean Sykes! What do you think is going to happen there?!

    • Dee(2) says:

      I don’t know the intricacies of the Australian budget. Is this something that is going to get widespread support because funds are tight in the current economy and it was an expenditure that they couldn’t explain, or get enough popular support around? Or is the general thought this is retribution for the popularity of the Sussexes and the success of their recent trip?

    • Calliope says:

      That’s awful. I thought they were really pulling to host it. Is this Royal/govt pressure?

      (I can imagine that the vice chair stepping down is royal pressure. Not direct threats but I’d expect them to use their pull to target her other work.)

      All these machinations instead of supporting actual veterans and their families. Unconscionable.

  3. My head hurts from all the shit slinging and we are not even to the year out part of the games. It’s going to be a much bumpier ride ahead!

  4. Dee(2) says:

    Sounds more like Birmingham should have never been selected as the option. Given that the other finalist was Washington DC though, who knows how that would have turned out. At the end of the day though this isn’t the patrons responsibility. That is why charities have boards. The Patron is there to do what Harry is doing, travel around and gather interest in the organization so that fundraisers will approach. It’s up to the board to maintain them.

    As for the other stuff, it’s clear and apparent that they are jealous of how successful Invictus has been and how it has bolstered Harry’s international reputation. They don’t have anything in comparison for William, and they hate that the stupid, dim, party Prince is the one that looks more like a leader then the heir. So they will do whatever they can to get him to step down. They thought that they would be able to ruin his reputation more with Sentabale, and they are still aiming for it here.

    • Me at home says:

      Yep, the Birmingham event this year is on July 10. In Washington that comes less than a week after the orange fascist’s self-aggrandizing 250th USA birthday extravaganza. Even a different July date would have been tough.

    • Shanta says:

      Dee(2)……I agree. Invictus should have never gone,anywhere near the UK. Its like being a pig at a barbeque…. Why. So of course they are going to fuc& it up…….the board opened the door and let the rats in😕

  5. Hypocrisy says:

    Willy is coming for Invictus but the Invictus foundation is worldwide and that is not going to go well, this is Prince Harry’s foundation and he is the one who is love and respect by the nations and veterans involved not any of the leftovers.. Willy will come out of this looking like a jealous petty fool, destroying or taking over IG isn’t going to make NATO respect him and meet with him, it’s not going to make veterans look up to him, Willy is obsessed at this point imo he’s never going to stop but it’s what will destroy him in the public eye eventually.. one thing is certain Willy isn’t very bright and the tabloid hacks he sends out to attack Prince Harry and IG are even less intelligent and it shows in the articles they publish.

  6. Beth says:

    What a lot of nonsense. The closing dates for recruitment were 11 May, lol! The Invictus 2027 Birmingham executive team is now in place. The IGF deputy chair/trustee has now left to focus mainly on the role of CHAIR of the Florence Nightingale Foundation. And no mention of the announcement yesterday that Deloitte is partnering with IG Birmingham. Btw, Boeing is still listed on the IGF website, lol!

    Froelich is a joke not taken seriously by anyone who knows anything. These people have no idea how the Invictus operating model works. The UK government (before the current lot) approved the UK bid and pledged £29m and there were/are compelling reasons for them choosing Birmingham. The rest will be made up through sponsorship and donations. The Vancouver/Whistler games was a huge success and delivered a balanced budget.

    • Me at home says:

      Thank you. Froelich’s numbers also omit spending by the thousands of Invictus visitors to Birmingham on its hotels, restaurants, entertainment, etc.

  7. Kel says:

    I just have to remind people that around the same time before Invictus Vancouver there were a couple of resignations and shuffling amongst the team and those games were a huge success.
    Also the other option was Washington DC and we see how that’s going with trump in office.
    I do think there will be budget challenges as there is with anything right now but I do remember them saying they had private money for Invictus.

    In a year the games will be happening and no one will even remember budget/staff stuff just like last time.

  8. Amy Bee says:

    This story is really about the organising committee in Birmingham and not actually about the Invictus Games Foundation. But if you’re not paying close attention you would be led to believe that Harry is involved and that the vice chairman left the Foundation. The press tried the same thing with the Whistler Games so it’s a repeat of that tactic.

    • jais says:

      Yeah, I seem to remember a lot of gloom and doom articles leading up to Whistler so I’m not particularly worried. Will the BM be messy? Yes, but I think the games will flourish, just as they always have.

  9. Mads says:

    Sykes said something in one of his videos that gets to the crux of the issue: Invictus gives Harry access to government Ministers and garners global attention. IMO the selection of Birmingham made sense because of the city’s first class medical facilities for injured service members but it’s in the UK and if the King doesn’t attend it’s a PR nightmare for the palace; plus the UK media will be forced to provide more coverage and not bury it as normal, and shatter the myth that Harry is hated in the UK. They have to sabotage the games even if it’s detrimental to hundreds of veterans and their families.

    • kirk says:

      I remember watching ESPN coverage of Vancouver Whistler IG games and follow-up discussions. Former Royal Marine J J Chalmers, (also former IG competitor and former IG Foundation Trustee) had only good things to say about Birmingham. He said that’s first place that wounded UK personnel go, so he had very positive feelings about the selection of that city. After watching some of the cutting edge healing techniques and approaches they were using in Vancouver, I’m hopeful the Birmingham siting will lead to greater collaboration, knowledge and sharing among the varied medical personnel.

      As for Tom Sycko, I can’t even begin to imagine the humiliation of calling someone like Paula Froelich a collaborator. Good grief. Why would anybody bother reading her substandard (NOT superb) piece of journalism that attempts a comparison between an NGO with participants from multiple countries and US DOD initiative for its own members—that’s USA gov, the world’s largest military spender, by a wide margin. 🙄

    • Tis True, Tis True says:

      Invictus has also become an important place for ministers, military leadership, and other elected officials from around the world to have “back door” unofficial meetings and discussions. Screwing that up will reflect very badly on the UK.

      William is just showing that he doesn’t understand the role of a world leader and doesn’t want to be one. He’s team all-about-me, aligned with the right wing forces that are trying to take down democracy. No real proof, just watching how he moves through the world.

  10. K says:

    They should have never put those games in the UK. I hope this is the wake up call Harry.

    • Blubb says:

      Again, that’s not Harry’s decision to make. And the alternative was Washington DC.

      • K says:

        If Harry has so little power and control as you’re saying, then he should be taking steps to fix that, or he’ll have another Sentebale disaster on his hands. And what poor planning led to these two dumpster fires being the only ones left to host the games? Did no one else put in a bid?

  11. Me at home says:

    For some reason i recently stumbled across a Sykes Daily Beast column from several years ago, where he slammed Willy and Kate and mentioned Rose Hanbury. What happened? The rota kicked him out for publicizing Charles’ advanced funeral planning, so to pay the mortgage and keep his kids in ritzy schools he’s turned to monetizing Sussex, esp. Meghan, hate. Guess it’s fair to say his “journalistic ethics” are for sale to the highest bidder.

    • Pebbles says:

      Yes. He’s trying to find his footing by doing endless YouTube videos bashing Meghan and Harry. Especially Meghan and saying very incendiary things about the children every single time she post on IG. He does a video to rile up haters everytime. Same with his substack.

      I’ll also mention that he did a very obvious apology tour during the US visit for suggesting that Charles was on his deathbed and was weak etc.

      I think he’s trying to get back in the good graces of UK establishment media to get a solid respectable job again after he was kicked out by Tobin.

  12. NorthernLights says:

    I’ll trust in the leadership at the Invictus Games Foundation who has not led an unsuccessful games yet despite all of the useless commentary from the uninformed peanut gallery. As Meghan says, everything else is just noise and people fall for it too easily.

  13. M says:

    The grossest part of that article is where he insinuates that Birmingham is full of terrorists. How else am I supposed to interpret “small but virulent Islamic extremist population”? Totally out of line and racist and frankly reads as a threat.

  14. QuiteContrary says:

    Yeah, I’m not going to worry too much about this bad-faith hand-wringing and concern trolling.

    Sykes says a lot in this line: “The event seems to be running out of time to get the British public to care.”

    Only monsters don’t care about an event for wounded military members and veterans, Psycho.

  15. YankeeDoodles says:

    I really think if I had to choose between D.C. at this point — with Trump in power — and Birmingham, I’d choose Birmingham in a heartbeat. And if Harry is there in July — which I imagine he will be — he will get a hero’s welcome. The North is a lot more robust and down to earth and he slots right in there. William? Not so much……..

  16. Mario says:

    This is why they should have chosen Washington D.C. over Birmingham. We have our own toxicity here in the U.S. and U.S. press but we celebrate veterans and wounded warriors in public culture.

    In Britain, the pop cultural and media instinct and desire to hate on Prince Harry and Meghan, discredit, and tear down all they are associated with is so much stronger than any sense of love or loyalty for veterans, wounded warriors, or the public service of it all.

    Birmingham never should have won out. The goal would be to keep the momentum from Germany and Canada. This muddies it all in an absolutely horrific way and takes all the focus off the competitors, while, if they are successful in damaging the institution, puts the whole thing in danger.

    Why did they choose Birmingham?

    • Gemini says:

      I think Harry’s strategy was to combine IG in the UK with his security court case which is understandable. He had some government officials through Invictus on his side and maybe thought he could leverage that in his favor in his fight for security. It didn’t work out in court but this calculated risk is still at play as we don’t yet know about the outcome of his security arrangements during the Games. From Harry’s standpoint I get it.

      After going through the courts I’m sure by now Harry left his wishful thinking behind, will get the job done in Birmingham and move on to the next games.

      My hope is for Meghan to stay in Montecito, support from there. By the way, without Meghan let’s see if Vogue, Harper’s Bazaar etc care enough to cover the Games.

  17. Kate says:

    I get between the two Birmingham was the better choice, but still not a good idea. Ignoring the fact that willam and the uk press want to ruin Harry, and are going for Invictus, will only make it happen faster. Pretending it can’t happen is only going to help it happen. Hoping Harry is taking this stuff seriously. The goal is to get the board to remove Harry, saying he’s toxic, lying about Meghan’s clothing, if they can’t do that they are fine taking the whole thing down. People only read headlines, and they believe them.

  18. IdlesAtCranky says:

    I really don’t understand why anyone who regularly reads this site puts any faith or credence in what S*kes or Fr**lich have to say.

    When is the last time either one of them wrote anything even vaguely balanced, let alone fair, about Harry or Invictus?

    I’m going to put my trust in Harry, who is a smart man whom I have faith has learned from the Sentebale debacle, and in the IG board and foundation.

    I’m going to support the Invictus Games in Birmingham as I have all the other IGs. I’m going to root for the veterans and their families. I’m going to hope that Harry has a great time, and that Meghan chooses the best and safest option for her to support her beloved in his cherished, important work.

    All the rest, as Meghan so cogently said, is just noise.

    • ArtHistorian says:

      Sykes and Eden have very smal platforms. Why get your panties in a twist about what very small fish write?

  19. Harriet says:

    All of Prince Harry’s people have been removed from the board JJ ect.

    Remember, Prince Harry was not even invited to attend the inuagrual ceremony in Birmingham, nor any of his crew.

    It’s their MO to destroy from the inside of the Board. They would not let him near Birmingham but now they are blaming him for everything.

    Funny how a week after the most bestest tour of the US the American sponsor drops out.

    • Mayp says:

      “Remember, Prince Harry was not even invited to attend the inuagrual ceremony in Birmingham, nor any of his crew.”.

      Yikes, I don’t remember this. That is not good.

    • bisynaptic says:

      What inaugural ceremony? The Birmingham games haven’t happened, yet.

  20. Jferber says:

    Lucy10, Agree with you 110 percent. Cancel!

  21. bisynaptic says:

    Why would they need marketing people, when you’re doing the marketing for them?
    I don’t understand the logic: ceteris paribus, pouring money into a bankrupt city seems like a good thing to do. If the city didn’t have the capacity to host the games, it wouldn’t have been selected.

  22. Jferber says:

    Bisynaptic, agree, it would be good for Birmingham if England didn’t have the propensity of shooting itself in the foot. The media (and Willy) would rather have Birmingham crumble to the ground than give Harry the “win” of another successful Invictus.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment