They’re scandalized because ‘Cookie Queens’ was sold to Paramount+ for streaming

January 2024 was a pretty rough moment for the Windsors. The Princess of Wales disappeared, with Kensington Palace issuing a cover story about a “scheduled abdominal surgery.” King Charles also went to the hospital for what was supposed to be some kind of routine prostate procedure. Keep in mind, on January 23rd, no one knew about Charles or Kate’s cancer diagnoses. On that day, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex popped up in Jamaica for the premiere of Bob Marley: One Love. They posed on the red carpet with Jamaica’s Prime Minister Andrew Holness, and they also posed with Brian and Tracy Robbins. Brian is the CEO of Paramount Pictures, the distributor of Bob Marley: One Love. Tracy is one of Meghan’s close friends and part of Meghan’s mahjong group. Brian and Tracy invited their friends to Jamaica, you see. The British media had a full-blown meltdown over all of it. The Daily Mail hyperventilated, plates were smashed in various palaces, and the Guardian blasted William and Kate for being “soft-power kryptonite.” Good times. Well, guess which studio purchased Cookie Queens for streaming?

There was widespread bemusement when the Duke and Duchess of Sussex turned up in Jamaica in 2024 to attend a film premiere honouring reggae legend Bob Marley. Not only did Prince Harry and Meghan have nothing to do with the film but they were photographed on the night with the Jamaican prime minister, Andrew Holness, who had vowed to push ahead with plans to ditch King Charles as head of state.

To add insult to injury, the King was preparing for hospital treatment for an enlarged prostate at the time. The couple were there as guests of the film’s producer, Paramount Pictures chief executive Brian Robbins, and it appears that the courtship may have paid dividends.

For I can disclose that Robbins’s streaming channel, Paramount+, has bought the rights to Cookie Queens, a documentary of which Harry and Meghan are executive producers.

Paramount+ is a major rival to Netflix, to which the couple were signed when they flew to Jamaica.

Their five-year deal with Netflix, which was said to be worth about $100 million (£75 million), ended in 2025. At that point, the Sussexes announced that they had signed a ‘multi-year, first-look deal’ with Netflix, which would give the US streaming giant a first option on proposals from their Archewell production company.

They said it disproved claims that they were going to part company completely with Netflix.

Cookie Queens, which follows ambitious young Girl Scouts competing to sell the most biscuits, was given its premiere at the Sundance Film Festival in January. Meghan, herself a former Girl Scout, said she was drawn to the project after seeing early footage. However, it fared so badly on its opening weekend in US cinemas that it was beaten by a compilation of cat videos.

[From The Mail+]

They can’t even decide what they’re mad about! Meghan and Harry executive-produced Cookie Queens through their own production company, Archewell Productions, not through Netflix. The Sussexes stepped in as EPs after director Alysa Nahmias appealed to Meghan personally, as a former Girl Scout. Meaning, Cookie Queens was always done outside of the Sussexes’ Netflix contract. Clearly, other studios, directors and producers are interested in working with the Sussexes. And I’m glad Cookie Queens found a good home for streaming. And again, Cookie Queens’ theatrical box office receipts totalled $623,057. This year’s Best Documentary Oscar winner made about $1.2 million.

Photos courtesy of Backgrid.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

14 Responses to “They’re scandalized because ‘Cookie Queens’ was sold to Paramount+ for streaming”

  1. Chelsea says:

    Brian Robbins is no longer at Paramount. He left in 2025 when the merger with Skydance happened. That being said it makes me so happy that the Fail has to keep writing articles now about how the Sussexes know powerful people, have projects that are flourishing, and financial freedom. I know it makes them sick lmao

    • Advisro2U says:

      Yep. And in January Brian Robbins lounged a new family production label – he is going back to his roots of family/kids programming. Nickelodeon (kids TV), is where Brian originally was the CEO of, before the merge with Paramount, and it became Paramount+

      He just collected over $100Mill from investors to produce this kind of content.

      So no, Paramount+ purchasing Cookies and Queens has nothing to do with Meghan and Harry’s friendship with the Robbinses. It’s just that that division of Paramount is the perfect streamer for this kids/teen/family programming.

      So, well done Meghan and everybody behind this lively production.
      I won’t be surprised it gets an Emmy nomination next year.

      • Chrissy says:

        If the Emmy nod happens, I look forward to hearing some brains exploding all the way across the Atlantic lol!

      • Amy Bee says:

        Wouldn’t it be Oscar nominated because it was shown in cinemas?

      • Jais says:

        Interesting. And he just moved to Paris yes? So clearly he can do all that work even if he’s not living in Cali. Much like Meghan.

    • DRN says:

      Was just coming to say the same: https://deadline.com/2026/01/brian-robbins-sony-production-deal-big-shot-1236698090/

      So, sloppy reporting from the Mail—no surprise. Though it may be that Paramount purchased the streaming rights before he left.

      • Advisro2U says:

        Yep. but maybe Meghan can collab with Brian’s “Big Shot Animation” production label to pickup the production of “Pearl” again, her first animation production Netflix stopped working with her on, after Netflix skipped their animation division entirely in 2021/2022.

  2. Mightymolly says:

    Can someone explain this to me like I’m a child who has never executive produced a film? The first look deal means that Netflix passed on the film before it was offered to Paramount+ who purchased it? And this is just how business works?

    • Jais says:

      Or it could have been that Netflix didn’t want to do a screening for the doc in theaters bc they only do that for a few films anyways. It seems clear to me that they wanted a film release for the doc.

  3. C-Shell says:

    Much as I hate how Paramount+ has evolved during this Trump administration, I keep my subscription because I love the Dutton universe and Billy Bob Thornton in Landman. Now, it’s paying me a dividend with Cookie Queens coming out as an excellent antidote to January 6 memories. I hope it gets many award nominations!

  4. Amy Bee says:

    Reading the comments up post, this DM article is embarrassing. Congratulations to the team behind Cooking Queens for it success and getting on a streaming platform.

  5. Eurydice says:

    Congrats, Cookie Queens!

    • Jais says:

      Yes, I feel like the film did well at the box office and was in line with most documentary releases. And it continues to get very good reviews. It just feels very aligned to Meghan so a good choice all around.

  6. Bunbun says:

    @MightyMolly Yes, Netflix passed so H&M took it to Sundance to try to get buyers.

    The first look deal with Netflix means they have to submit any productions to Netflix first. CQ wouldn’t have gone to Sundance if Netflix had picked it up.

    It feels like Sundance was forever ago, but it looks like their efforts to sell CQ there, plus relationships with Paramount honchos, led to the Paramount purchase.

    CQ was already a finished product when it was brought to the attention of H&M. It was the brain child of a different creator. H&M signed on as executive producers, which can mean everything from the primary drivers on the business side of a production to a financial or other type of backer.

    The latter is usually a way to get funds and/or PR from the executive producers, with the executive producers getting their name attached to a project and possibly back end profit. Plus the option to sell the IP rights

    So H&M weren’t the primary drivers of the film, it was a finished product when it got to them.

    They were able to get EP credits and threw in some backing funds and/or PR – visibility.

    Given the box office numbers for CQ, I doubt there was a profit in financial form, but it seems likely that profit came from selling the IP rights to Paramount.

    I think this is a good business model for them if they can replicate it – attach their names to smaller budget projects, do some PR to get the project much greater visibility, then sell the rights.

    The first look deal (right of first refusal) means they have to offer anything through Netflix first.

    I think there was another project that Netflix passed on that they subsequently sold to Amazon, but I’m not sure.

    There’s talk that they are filming in the UK for a “day in the life back in the UK”- type series that Netflix has taken on, but there are a billion rumors so who knows.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment