Stylish Celebrity Escapism
Contributing Writers
Apr 4
'08
Leonardo DiCaprio buys eco-friendly condo in NYC



<< last image     next image >>

Written by JayBird

Posted in Environment, Leonardo DiCaprio, Real Estate

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

22 Responses to “Leonardo DiCaprio buys eco-friendly condo in NYC”

  1. now, this guy: i like.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  2. now, this guy: i like.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  3. This guy and all his contemporary cohorts have set back the cause of environmentalists everywhere by decades, mark my words. The kind of sensationalist crap these celebs spew has the opposite effect they’re looking for.

    Let me elaborate: I would say nearly everyone agrees that it’s not a good idea to spew millions of cubic feet of crap into the atmosphere and water every day, we do breathe and drink that. But when you start going around trying to convince people that the world is ending, when it clearly isn’t, it turns people off the cause.

    It’s the difference between a priest urging people to treat their neighbors better, and a guy standing on the side of the road with a sandwich board stenciled with “THE END IS NEAR!”

    One gets you listened to and respected, the other gets you ridiculed and only serves to hurt the cause. We need small steps in the right direction, not lies to guilt us into changing.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  4. This guy and all his contemporary cohorts have set back the cause of environmentalists everywhere by decades, mark my words. The kind of sensationalist crap these celebs spew has the opposite effect they’re looking for.

    Let me elaborate: I would say nearly everyone agrees that it’s not a good idea to spew millions of cubic feet of crap into the atmosphere and water every day, we do breathe and drink that. But when you start going around trying to convince people that the world is ending, when it clearly isn’t, it turns people off the cause.

    It’s the difference between a priest urging people to treat their neighbors better, and a guy standing on the side of the road with a sandwich board stenciled with “THE END IS NEAR!”

    One gets you listened to and respected, the other gets you ridiculed and only serves to hurt the cause. We need small steps in the right direction, not lies to guilt us into changing.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  5. “DiCaprio is showing people that they don’t need to have a diminished quality of life in order to be good to the earth.”

    No, in fact, he’s making it look like you have to be a multimillionaire to be both green and comfortable.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  6. “DiCaprio is showing people that they don’t need to have a diminished quality of life in order to be good to the earth.”

    No, in fact, he’s making it look like you have to be a multimillionaire to be both green and comfortable.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  7. Scott - I agree with you to a point. Although I think they are two issues. Environmental pollution is a problem to one’s immediate health, however many modern products are almost wholly based on petrochemicals - plastics, paints, carpeting etc. Which create dioxins in their creation - and do emit them as they break down (especially by heat or sunlight). These are nasty substances which are generally carcinogenic and can reduce male fertility.

    The production of CO2 through combustion and manufacturing of items such as concrete have different ramifications.

    I certainly agree that over-sensationalising things, means that many will either ignore it or wholly believe the naysayers because it will require sacrifices.

    The fact of the matter is that while Earth’s temperature has been rising past previous trends of peak temperatures every 30 years or so,(1913 and 1940, 1976 highpoints) - and settling into more gradual patterns over the past number of centuries. The last time the earth had a higher concentration of CO2 than now the sea level was 6m higher. the last time it was 2degrees celcius higher than now the sea level was 2m higher.

    This may not seem like much - but consider how many major cities - including the US - that are built on the coast or in estuaries? That leaves the decision to either abandon the existing infrastructure or protect it. Who is going to pay for that? Where the coast can’t be protected the people living there will have to move, presumably inland, needing services and housing for this migration. By defending coastal infrastructure, that will likely lead to the loss of beaches as they cannot be replenished by dunes, and wipe out areas which need the beaches for tourism (like Florida and California)

    Then you have how that impacts on flood patterns. At present there are certain events that used to happen at statistically regular periods - e.g. 20 year heatwave or drought, 10 year minor flood etc.) The most severe of these would be regarded as a 1-in-100 year event where flood waters rise above the normal flooding. It is believed that rising sea level will compound more minor flooding and droughts, resulting in a 1-in-45 year event, even 1-in-10 should the sea levels rise dramatically.

    So basically, the global temperature is rising - whether one wants to believe it’s down to Mother Earth or Henry Ford. This would happen anyway, but at present it seems to be happening at an unchecked level. Because the world has so much invested in infrastrucure and housing near the points - it is in our interest to reduce the impact that we have now, because we will be dog-poor in the future to pay for it.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  8. Scott - I agree with you to a point. Although I think they are two issues. Environmental pollution is a problem to one’s immediate health, however many modern products are almost wholly based on petrochemicals - plastics, paints, carpeting etc. Which create dioxins in their creation - and do emit them as they break down (especially by heat or sunlight). These are nasty substances which are generally carcinogenic and can reduce male fertility.

    The production of CO2 through combustion and manufacturing of items such as concrete have different ramifications.

    I certainly agree that over-sensationalising things, means that many will either ignore it or wholly believe the naysayers because it will require sacrifices.

    The fact of the matter is that while Earth’s temperature has been rising past previous trends of peak temperatures every 30 years or so,(1913 and 1940, 1976 highpoints) - and settling into more gradual patterns over the past number of centuries. The last time the earth had a higher concentration of CO2 than now the sea level was 6m higher. the last time it was 2degrees celcius higher than now the sea level was 2m higher.

    This may not seem like much - but consider how many major cities - including the US - that are built on the coast or in estuaries? That leaves the decision to either abandon the existing infrastructure or protect it. Who is going to pay for that? Where the coast can’t be protected the people living there will have to move, presumably inland, needing services and housing for this migration. By defending coastal infrastructure, that will likely lead to the loss of beaches as they cannot be replenished by dunes, and wipe out areas which need the beaches for tourism (like Florida and California)

    Then you have how that impacts on flood patterns. At present there are certain events that used to happen at statistically regular periods - e.g. 20 year heatwave or drought, 10 year minor flood etc.) The most severe of these would be regarded as a 1-in-100 year event where flood waters rise above the normal flooding. It is believed that rising sea level will compound more minor flooding and droughts, resulting in a 1-in-45 year event, even 1-in-10 should the sea levels rise dramatically.

    So basically, the global temperature is rising - whether one wants to believe it’s down to Mother Earth or Henry Ford. This would happen anyway, but at present it seems to be happening at an unchecked level. Because the world has so much invested in infrastrucure and housing near the points - it is in our interest to reduce the impact that we have now, because we will be dog-poor in the future to pay for it.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  9. That’s a poor photoshop job on that magazine cover. It looks like deCaprio is hovering above the ice.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  10. That’s a poor photoshop job on that magazine cover. It looks like deCaprio is hovering above the ice.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  11. at least hes trying to help out the environment! i wish more and more people would become aware of this

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  12. at least hes trying to help out the environment! i wish more and more people would become aware of this

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  13. the earth has cooled down and heated up for millions of years. look at the history of the earth. dinosaurs lived in a humid, tropical environment, cooling down happened with an iceage, heating up happening now again. its not a huge deal. el nino and el nina also have a lot to do with the global temperatures.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  14. the earth has cooled down and heated up for millions of years. look at the history of the earth. dinosaurs lived in a humid, tropical environment, cooling down happened with an iceage, heating up happening now again. its not a huge deal. el nino and el nina also have a lot to do with the global temperatures.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  15. I realise my last post was very long-winded. But in a nutshell you’re generally right Rianna…

    However, the Earth is warming up to such a rate that we can’t adapt our lifestyles and infrasturcutre to match - if global sea levels rise, major cities on the sea or on tidal rivers are at risk.

    So either way, millions if not billions will need to be spent to rebuild or defend them. Simple as. So although it may not affect us now - give it 30 - 50 years and it certainly will affect the quality of life then - less money to spend on the interwebz that’s for certain.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  16. I realise my last post was very long-winded. But in a nutshell you’re generally right Rianna…

    However, the Earth is warming up to such a rate that we can’t adapt our lifestyles and infrasturcutre to match - if global sea levels rise, major cities on the sea or on tidal rivers are at risk.

    So either way, millions if not billions will need to be spent to rebuild or defend them. Simple as. So although it may not affect us now - give it 30 - 50 years and it certainly will affect the quality of life then - less money to spend on the interwebz that’s for certain.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  17. The earth is ever changing and we will have to adapt. I think we have to be good stewards of the land we are giving but I don’t think there is much we can do to change the earth’s climate one way or another. I also don’t believe that the short studies we have done in comparison to the earth’s age could possibly be comprehensive enough to give a clear picture of what the earth was like hundreds, thousands or even millions of years ago.

    Bottom line, live responsibly but don’t go spastic with panic.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  18. The earth is ever changing and we will have to adapt. I think we have to be good stewards of the land we are giving but I don’t think there is much we can do to change the earth’s climate one way or another. I also don’t believe that the short studies we have done in comparison to the earth’s age could possibly be comprehensive enough to give a clear picture of what the earth was like hundreds, thousands or even millions of years ago.

    Bottom line, live responsibly but don’t go spastic with panic.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  19. Oh and bravo for Leo. I don’t agree with his sense of doom and urgency but I do commend him for living what he believes and not being terribly obnoxious about it either.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  20. Oh and bravo for Leo. I don’t agree with his sense of doom and urgency but I do commend him for living what he believes and not being terribly obnoxious about it either.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  21. Good on Leo. And right on Mariead. Couldn’t have said it any better.

    The world might not end tomorrow or even in a 100 years, but human beans MUST start living sustainably. Otherwise we’re all screwed

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  22. Good on Leo. And right on Mariead. Couldn’t have said it any better.

    The world might not end tomorrow or even in a 100 years, but human beans MUST start living sustainably. Otherwise we’re all screwed

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

Leave a Reply

Celebitchy aims to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not.

By commenting you agree to the following: That you will strive keep the discussion as civil and friendly as possible and to respect others as if you are having a conversation in person. That you will not make comments that are exceptionally rude, attacking, or baiting to other commenters. That you will not go after people with personal attacks for not agreeing with you. You will try to address their points calmly and not resort to name-calling. That you will not respond to name-calling by lowering yourself to that person's level and calling them names back. Instead of firing back a heated response, you will report comments that you feel are harassing or mean. That you will not post pornographic, obscene, defamatory, abusive, racist or bigoted comments. That you will not post spam or commercial comments at all. This includes promoting your blog, although links relating to the information discussed can be posted. That you will not post large blocks of text from other sources. You may post brief excerpts with links, but please not more than one paragraph. That you will use only one name on the site and not register under more than one alias. This is a bannable offense, and is easily found out. That you are solely responsible for your own comments. If you violate the law or are guilty of defamation you may be held legally responsible. That you will indemnify Celebitchy.com from any responsibility for damages resulting from comments made on this site.

Comments may be deleted for any reason. Celebitchy moderators reserve the right to remove comments that violate the general rules along with any comments deemed distracting, inappropriate, off topic or rude. Celebitchy moderators reserve the right to remove logins, moderate and ban commenters for any reason.

Comments are sporadically moderated due to abuse complaints and spammer's keywords. Celebitchy.com and its moderators will not be held liable for comments in any way. Use the "Report this comment as spam or abuse" link to ask the moderators to delete a comment if it's offensive. If you comment disappears, it has been eaten by the spam filter. Please e-mail cbcomments at gmail.com to get it retrieved.

:D :-) :( :o 8O :? 8) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen:

Get an icon next to your name by signing up for a free Gravatar

Recent Comments:
  • CAA: Why would McD’s wanna ruin my appetite? And what makes the old coot think he can speak for the other...
  • MB Travis: This couple is lovely and enlightened enough that they do not need you to defend them. Remember that...
  • SirWilliamX: She’s beautiful, sexy, and have beautiful voice… and he is an loser. She was not for him. In...
  • CeeJay: O.K. So, nobody else is going to call Jaybird on this one? Las Vegas is not a state. It is a city in the...
  • nen: i think katie never really love tom, I am sure that katie used tom for her career and everything and because tom...
  • Marie: Codzilla, “<3″ = heart so I’m assuming they mean I heart/love whoever.
  • omi: Angelina absolutly glows it is a blessing to be a mom her children are very lucky to have her as a mother
  • Viv: Does anyone else think it’s ironic the pet is named Biscuit?
 
 

Celebitchy is a celebrity gossip site written by several independent authors. The opinions of the authors are their own and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Celebitchy, LLC. All information on this site is for entertainment purposes only. Articles are based on rumor, conjecture, and published information in other sources. Celebitchy, LLC makes no claims that content is valid, accurate, or true. Celebitchy, LLC and the authors contributing to it will not be held liable for damages resulting from errors, omissions or falsehoods published on this site. It is not the site or the contributing authors' intention to defame or malign any particular group, religion, ethnic group, club, organization, company, or individual. Celebitchy, LLC is not responsible for content on linked or quoted sources. All comments made by visitors to the blog are the responsibility of their respective authors and are only sporadically monitored. Celebitchy, LLC will not be held liable for comments in any way.