Stylish Celebrity Escapism
Contributing Writers
Jun 9
'08
Anne Hathaway’s boyfriend in trouble again

Anne Hathaway’s boyfriend Raffaello Follieri seems like he may very well be a totally skeevy jerk. Rumors about his terrible money mismanagement have been circulating for years, and he was sued several years ago by L.A. billionaire Ron Burkle, who claimed Follieri mismanaged funds meant for his charitable foundation and instead used the money to finance his lavish lifestyle with Hathaway.

Follieri settled the lawsuit earlier this year, and was then arrested for writing a bad check – for $215,000. Now that he’s gotten that little issue taken care of, New York’s Attorney General Andrew Cuomo is investigating the children’s charity Follieri runs – for a plethora of financial misdeeds.

Cuomo’s investigators in recent weeks served subpoenas seeking financial documents from the Follieri Foundation, which is headed by Hathaway’s beau, 29-year-old Italian businessman Raffaello Follieri, the AG’s office confirmed yesterday. Cuomo’s office refused to reveal why it was eyeing the Manhattan-based charity, which says its programs include vaccinating Third World children.

Confirmation of the probe came after Cuomo’s office was asked whether it was aware that the foundation might have failed to file tax-disclosure forms required of nonprofit groups. A check of an online database that collects the “990″ IRS forms showed that the Follieri Foundation is required to file the form, yet has never done so.

Hathaway, who also starred in “The Princess Diaries,” served on the foundation’s board until at least last year, when she traveled to Central America with Follieri for a charity-funded vaccination program. “She was on the board, but is no longer,” Hathaway’s spokesman said. “I don’t remember exactly when she ceased to be a board member.” Asked whether Hathaway, 25, knew about the probe and its focus, he said, “Since she is no longer associated with the foundation, why would you expect her to be familiar with all of this?”

Follieri’s spokeswoman, Melanie Bonvicino, said, “Raffaello Follieri and his attorney, Cyrus Vance [Jr.], have been cooperating fully with the Attorney General’s Office to satisfy their routine inquiry. Furthermore, Mr. Follieri looks forward to concluding this matter in a timely and expeditious manner . . . so that he may continue to fulfill his ongoing philanthropic endeavors worldwide.”

[From the New York Post]

Given Follieri’s excessively long record of financial misdeeds, it seems perfectly likely that he’s done something illegal with his charitable foundation. He always manages to buy himself out of his troubles, which is odd because you’d think that if he had that money, he should have just done the right thing in the first place. Which makes it seem like he’s not simply bad at managing money and/or making some dumb financial choices or mistakes. It seems like he’s trying to swindle people. Follieri and Hathaway have been dating since 2004, and there are no signs that she’s wising up to this guy.

Here’s Anne Hathaway and Raffaello Follieri at the American Museum of Natural History in New York on March 13th. Images thanks to Splash.

Written by JayBird

Posted in Anne Hathaway, Legal Troubles, Money, Photos, Raffaello Follieri

Pages: 1 2

13 Responses to “Anne Hathaway’s boyfriend in trouble again”

  1. I read a while back she lived with one of her Devil Wears Prada costars for a while as a romantic situation.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  2. He looks like Zac Braff and I don’t like Zac Braff. Ditch the loser Anne.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  3. Follieri is extremely well-connected, isn’t he? I seem to remember him doing some high-profile deal with Harvey Weinstein…

    But yeah, the guy’s a douche. Anne’s career is on track, and dumping wouldn’t hurt. Just say no to skeevy Italians, Anne!

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  4. i love zac braff, but you’re right, lola… he does look like zac

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  5. He looks like the devil,,look at those red eyes!! I totally love love love love love Anne Hathaway,,,shes got the most beautiful eyes and the nicest porcelain skin. (she must use proactive)

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  6. He is obviously nothing more than a two-bit con man. Hopefully Hathaway isn’t as dumb as I was with my sleazy con man ex nd paying off his troubles for him. Wise up, you will be broke if you stay with him a minute longer-I am!

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  7. Famous does not equal smart. :(

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  8. That’s exactly what I was going to say! A clean-looking Zach Braff! :D

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  9. You’d be in trouble too if you had to have sex with that doughy thing…

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  10. Lose that pudgy dough boy on your arm Anne and in the long run, you’ll be so glad you did.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  11. So they have been dating since she was 21? She probably thinks he can do no wrong

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  12. ‘Nicky Arnstein, Nicky Arnstein’

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  13. Anonymous Realist- I would assume you’re talking about her man, since he’s the one in trouble, so you’re saying Anne Hathaway is doughy? and Hayden is eternally pudgy. wow, so if your bones aren’t jutting out, and your face isn’t concave, you’re pudgy and/or doughy?
    You are no realist, unless of course your reality is a starving third world country.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

Leave a Reply


Comment Policy: Please be courteous as if you are having a conversation in person. No all-caps posts. If you make comments using different nicknames, repeatedly harass others, or spam, you will be banned. If you make an exceptionally rude comment that people complain about, it will be deleted. Do not dominate the threads by making the same point over and over again or you will be banned. We understand and respect that threads can get heated. Threads will occasionally be closed if the conversation gets very nasty. Repeatedly baiting other commenters or giving rude and attacking responses is not allowed. It's a shame we have to mention that because most of you are kind and respectful of other's opinions.

Comments occasionally become moderated due to spammer's keywords and abuse complaints against specific users, but are otherwise not moderated. We are not responsible for comments in any way and while we work hard to moderate hate words and clean them up we do not have the time or inclination to ensure that they're all acceptable to everyone. In other words - do not blame us for stupid or offensive comments. You will find them on almost every open comment site online. Use the "report spam or abuse" link to get us to delete something if it's offensive.

:D :-) :( :o 8O :? 8) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen:

Get an icon next to your name by signing up for a free Gravatar

Recent Comments:
  • Nudgie: I think Casey should do the honorable thing… ASK FOR A DNA TEST. Watch the Spears’ head for the...
  • vdantev: The role of being another smirking, fat unfunny jackass like Jack Black ?
  • vdantev: They forgot a like amount of blow to seal the deal.
  • Orangejulius: ‘Monstrosity’????? She’s not gorgeous, by any means, but come on!!!!!
  • sharon: I don’t love micheal moore, but I love the idea of a slacker uprising HARD. So I can say this movie...
  • morgs: It had to have been luuurve at first sight.
  • vdantev: Who uses the internet? Who are these people ?
  • vdantev: Anyone who still watches Oprah loses all my respect anyway.
 
 

Celebitchy is a celebrity gossip site written by several independent authors. The opinions of the authors are their own and do not necessarily represent the opinions of the site owner. All information on this site is for entertainment purposes only. Articles are based on rumor, conjecture, and published information in other sources. The site makes no claims that content is valid, accurate, or true. The site owner and the authors contributing to it will not be held liable for damages resulting from errors, omissions or falsehoods published on this site. It is not the site owner or the contributing authors' intention to defame or malign any particular group, religion, ethnic group, club, organization, company, or individual. The site owner is not responsible for content on linked or quoted sources. All comments made by visitors to the blog are the responsibility of their respective authors and are only sporadically monitored. The site owner will not be held liable for comments in any way.