Below is a little preview video of Jennifer Aniston’s appearance on Chelsea Lately tonight – the show was pretaped days ago, and from the looks of the preview, Chelsea is still in major Aniston-ass-kissing mode. Aniston must have some kind special access to the best kind of tequila, right? Anyway, just in case you believed those “reports” that Aniston was trying to “distance” herself from Chelsea Handler – she’s not. They’re still BFFs.
If you have a tiny little Chihuahua, I understand the desire to dress your dog up. Sort of. I still think it’s extremely embarrassing for the dog, but I get it when the dog is tiny. I do not understand dressing up a dog bigger than a cat. That’s why Norman walked away – besides the overpowering booze fumes wafting off of his mom and his “Aunt” Chelsea. Norman was embarrassed. Dogs get embarrassed. It’s mean to dress them up.
In other Chelsea Handler news, she’s still boning Andre Balazs, so says Page Six:
Chelsea Handler and Andre Balazs continued their love affair in Dallas for Super Bowl weekend. The comedian and the Hungarian hotelier, who first hooked up during the Sundance Film Festival, were spotted making out at the Don Julio/1Oak Saturday night in Dallas. The couple partied together until about 2 a.m. alongside Jim Carrey, Demi Moore and Ashton Kutcher, Kid Rock and David Spade, who was spotted exiting the party with Selita Ebanks.
[From Page Six]
Chelsea took her man to Dallas for the SuperBowl? It must be love.
Photos courtesy of WENN.
This is actually encouraging news; The faster Jennifer Anniston can flame out her career, the better. Showing up on Chelsea Handlers show as often as she does just speeds up the process. How wasted do we expect her to be?
Her hair color looks gross!!!
Chelsea is an adult, Jennifer is in no way responsible for what Chelsea thinks or says. If a friend of mine put down my exhusbands new piece, I wouldn’t care at all..as long as she left the kids alone.
I love Jen’s shoes. But the PR stunt friendship with the comedienne who makes fun of her ex’s babies not so much.
I like Jen but her taste in bfs & bffs leaves a lot to be desired.
And I agree about dressing up dogs larger than a breadbox….don’t do it!
Ugh, they both need to go away. This little appearance Jen is making is to confirm how petty and immature they both are.
Oh Aniston, you disappoint me. The fact that she is aligning herself with the drunken AJ et al., slamming Chelsea tells me all I need to know about her. And the fact that she has been showing up to speaking events slurring also shows me that she is going down a bitter self destructive path.
Yuck X 100
@ brin & Crash2GO2 – Just wanted to say good morning! (You, too, Rita…wherever you are this morning 🙂 )
I like Jen, too, but completely agree w/ brin about her choices in BF’s & BFF’s. Ugh. And no doubt Norman was embarassed. LOL
Good morning happygirl! I should be hitting the freeway but here I am, frittering away my morning on CeleBitchy. 🙂 Oh well!!
This, more than anything, tells me that Jen does say shit about Angie to her friends, does still hold a torch or is jealous for/about Brad and does enjoy the immature, talky, backstabby, highschool bullshit that she should have grown out of 2 decades ago. Way to be classy, Jen.
Maybe the 2 of them got something going on. How sad, JA can’t bring any kids out to show off she gotta dress up her old dog. Awkward……
@someone: That’s the problem; Handler didn’t leave the kids alone. And the fact that Aniston is obviously okay with this says all anyone needs to know about her.
You Angelina fans are too sensative!
Aniston’s acting is so mediocre and it is unbelievable that this woman makes $8 million per film, but then again I am simply astounded at the type of women who are the leading news makers and money makers in Hollywood. Women like Jennifer Aniston and Kim Kardashian exert much influence over young girls today due to their media exposure. Aniston-the life long victim whose friends bash young children and Kim Kardashian,America’s favorite prostitute, makes millions with her baby voice and nude pictures. Wow, women have not come very far in the U.S. if this is all we have to show for it!!!!!
“How sad, JA can’t bring any kids out to show off”
@ trippin: yes, it is sad. so sad when a woman has no children – just a wasted life, an empty barren shell of an existence. in fact, all barren women should never leave their homes because of the shame of having no children. maybe there could be an island where all the sad, childless women could live together, far away from decent society.
Really, another Handler and Aniston story? They share management. Of course Aniston will appear on her show–regardless of whether she privately loves, hates, or feels indifferent about the woman.
Jennifer whines to Perez, “why are you so mean? You hurt my feelings!!”, but befriends/continues to support one of the biggest racist/child-hating bullies around?? I guess Jen thinks “meanness” is only bad when applied to her…hypocrite.
I think Norman is one of the best dog names ever.
BTW this is interesting
http://www.observer.com/2011/culture/does-anyone-believe-jennifer-aniston-was-cast-snl?utm_medium=partial-text&utm_campaign=home
Apparantly the whole SNL thing is suspected to be a PR stunt who knows.
She can be friends with whomever she likes and she’s not responsible for what her friends say.
Anyway, I find that if a dog doesn’t want to wear clothes, they do NOT wear clothes. I tried to put a sweater on my dog to take him out walking when it was kinda cold and he was just not having it. He was rolling around, biting at it, biting at me, scratching at it until I finally just tried to pull it off at which point he ripped it and chewed it to pieces. I’ve never tried to put clothes on him again.
Norman seems perfectly at ease in his vest-he didn’t seem to like being on stage but the vest was the least of his worries.
My mother has talked sh!t about my dad now for 34 years because he left her 4 months pregnant with her 3rd child and remarried 2 months later…
Sometimes insecure women just dont ever get over it.
Jen’s face at :34 on Oprah, looks like she is so not over her divorce.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2MiJe_hob3E&feature=related
I just watched Lisa Kudrow on Joy Behar. She had never heard the SNL story .I find that in 10 years of filming JA never mentioned that Lorne Michaels wanted her for SNL to her castmates. Maybe she mentioned it to Courtney. Also Lisa had no idea David was out of rehab. Tracking They don’t share managers they have the same publicist,so I guess that’s why they go on vacation together, right.
Jennifer Aniston’s taste in BFF’s is the same as her crappy taste in men.
Chelsea is an old hag and Jennifer is over-rated. They will both be old, alone and drunk.
I previously gave Jennifer the benefit of the doubt and that she was not putting her stamp of approval on Chelsea, but I see that see that I was wrong.
It just shows how petty they both are.
I don’t even like Angelina, but now I can see why Brad dumped her.
There sure is a lot of hate for Jennifer..I have no idea why…do people still think a woman has to have children to validify herself as a woman?????get out of the past and come into the future..children are not for everyone!!!
@ someone on this we agree people should stop making fun of Aniston for not having children or being married.
Between the slurred speeches on interviews & appearances, the increasingly toxed out face, the embarrassing photospread in Allure, the obvious PR fauxmances, the sly references to her marraige that ended years ago and the close friendship with a comiedienne who makes fun of her ex-husband’s children & current partner-there is more than enough material without resorting to tacky and sexist remarks.
@mln76:
Just because the author doesn’t believe her doesn’t mean that she lied. And the author needs to check his facts:
“But by now, SNL is such a venerable brand, Lorne Michaels such a once-again-beloved figure, that even the name of the show lends a star a certain cachet. Why host the show when you can say you almost starred on it?”
Jennifer HAS hosted it. Two times in fact…
Cheyenne:
February 7th, 2011 at 12:22 pm @someone: That’s the problem; Handler didn’t leave the kids alone. And the fact that Aniston is obviously okay with this says all anyone needs to know about her.
Cheyenne: how is it *obvious* she’s ok with the kid issue? Isn’t she on CA’s show to promote a movie? I think it’s irrational to hold Jennifer Aniston responsible for what Chelsea Handler uses in her monologue.
“here sure is a lot of hate for Jennifer..I have no idea why”
Really? All you have to do is read the comments and kaiser’s post because they seem to clearly spell out why some people find her distasteful.
@olivia I don’t think that was the point of that line. I believe he is using hyperbole but I could be wrong 🙂
@skibunny Cheyenne: how is it *obvious* she’s ok with the kid issue? Isn’t she on CA’s show to promote a movie? I think it’s irrational to hold Jennifer Aniston responsible for what Chelsea Handler uses in her monologue.
We know Aniston is fully aware of what is said about her in the tabs she even made a point of stating on Oprah, Ellen, and Conan that she wasn’t adopting a Mexican baby. On her previous Handler appearance she sat and denied verbatim several tab rumours. She also felt so compelled to confront Perez Hilton a blogger in public presumably because what ever he has written about has effected her emotionally. Why wouldn’t she feel the need to call out her ‘friend’ Handler? Why wouldn’t this 42 year old woman with a two decade long career considered to be a television legend refuse to appear on the show so that she specifically wouldn’t appear to support comments made against the children of her ex husband?
No one would care about Aniston not having kids, (see Cameron and Renee and Sandra Bullock for a long time) if she didn’t KEEP BRINGING IT UP HERSELF! For years before and even after her marriage, she would talk about having a baby soon/next year/at some point and it’s just never happened. You can’t blame people for juxtaposing her life after she’s said these words with her ex’s who has gone out and made things happen for himself. She’s just all hot air and not much else frankly.
Well, I really love what she is wearing. I want that dress. I’m impressed that it’s not black.
Also, people shouldn’t make fun of her for not having kids. And yes, kids are not for everyone, but Jennifer has publicly stated she wants them and will have them.
I don’t beleive the SNL story either. Jennifer does well on sitcoms but live comedy? Maybe I’m wrong. And why would she pick a show that was just starting up, she had no idea it would be the hit it turned out to be over a show that was already established and has made a career for many people?
@mln:Why wouldn’t she feel the need to call out her ‘friend’ Handler? Why wouldn’t this 42 year old woman with a two decade long career considered to be a television legend refuse to appear on the show so that she specifically wouldn’t appear to support comments made against the children of her ex husband?
Oh c’mon that’s desperate! Why isn’t every other celebrity that appears on Chelsea Handler’s show feel the need. Why single out Jennifer Aniston? And dont use the friend argument because I’m sure JA isn’t Chelsea’s only friend. Why is Jennifer Aniston the only one held responsible? Why should she defend them? Can’t they defend themselves?
@skibunny Go back and read the headlines, when the story broke Aniston was specifically implicated and associated with it. Someone making fun of Jolie and the kids doesn’t make news, the fact that promptly after vacationing with Aniston, Handler made comments about them was what was interesting to the media. Since Aniston never made an official comment distancing herself from them she is by notion of her appearance giving her stamp of approval to Handler.
EDIT: Yes I am aware of the comments of a ‘friend’ at Popeater that Aniston was angry at Chelsea about the comments. If that was true she wouldn’t be appearing on her show.
In defense of dressing up chihuahuas — not only are they small, but their hair is really sparse & it causes them to get very cold (hence all the shivering you see chihuahuas doing). I’m not into the hats and “costumes” per se, but in the fall & winter a chihuahua definitely needs a sweater. 🙂
Skibunny CH made racist comments about Jen’s ex husband’s kids. I watch the show and I can’t recall her making racist comments about any other celebrities’ kids. Please correct me if I’m wrong.As for the baby issue, JA has being saying she wants to be a mom for almost 6 years starting with the 2005 Vanity Fair and as recently as last week.Paraphrasing on Extra last week The tabloids have stolen my thunder(baby stories) so when I have a baby there won’t be as much excitement because of the false stories.
@mln: Go back and read the headlines, when the story broke Aniston was specifically implicated and associated with it.
Of course she was. Headlines sell. Do you believe everything you read in the *media*? Bottom line. She’s promoting a movie and that’s why she’s on the show. You’re going to have to dig a little deeper here to rationalize your comment to me. You dont like her! Fair enough. But to believe media BS and use it as an excuse to defend your dislike of her is silly to me. Sorry!
I might add she’s looking mighty hot and her dog is adorable.
You’re correct- there is no shame in not being in a relationship and/or not having kids. By her actions, if not by her words, Jen has shown herself to be that type of person – WHICH IS FINE. My boss is a very cool woman with no kids or relationship and SHE LOVES IT. She gently mocks us marrieds and OWNS her life choices- compare to Cameron Diaz before a-rod. Guys want to date her because she is confident & fun- no whining or games. It’s been a few kids since I was in the dating world, but I DO remember how much guys of all ages. HATE whining & passive aggressive BS.
@ skibunny Aniston can and is going on higher rated talk shows with more cache in the public. Oprah, the View, Ellen ..etc etc Handler is not a show she needs to do, she is choosing to go there, and choosing to court whatever backlash (IF there is any) in the media. But I haven’t convinced you of anything. We are going around in circles so lets keep this friendly and stop now 🙂
Kim:
February 7th, 2011 at 3:54 pm Skibunny CH made racist comments about Jen’s ex husband’s kids. I watch the show and I can’t recall her making racist comments about any other celebrities’ kids. Please correct me if I’m wrong.
I have never watched Chelsea Handler’s show. I still dont get why just because Jennifer was married to Brad Pitt a hundred years ago you think she’s responsible for what CH puts in her monologue? You dont know if JA approves. What about everyone else who’s been on CH’s show? Why isn’t Brad or Angie calling out CH if it was so offensive? Why haven’t the producers of the show said something?
You are using it as a lame excuse to justify your dislike. That’s what’s obvious to me.
@mln: I’m not taking any offense. Nor do I mean to offend anyone. Are we not having a friendly debate? Certainly we can agree to disagree. I dont invest myself emotionally into any movie star but I do find the reasoning behind some of the comments to be irrational at times.
You have a right to your feelings and opinions and I respect that.
Isn’t it the studios who choose the talk shows? I didn’t think actors had that option. Just wondering.
@JohnnyDepp’sGirl: That is sad about your mom; sadder still that she had to drag you into it. Thirty-four years is a long time to be harboring a grudge.
____________________________________________
@skibunny: By continuing to appear on Handler’s show after she let loose with that disgusting monologue, Aniston is giving tacit approval to what Handler said. She is making it look like she is using Handler as her pit bull to say up front what she only whines about in private.
@skibunny you aren’t offending me I enjoy your comments in general I also enjoy friendly debate but sometimes the comments on the Aniston/Jolie/Pitt topics get crazy.
I am going to guess that an actor at Aniston’s level has total control of what talk shows and appearances she makes especially in this case when there is such a disparity in Handler and Aniston’s notoriety. But maybe someone with more knowledge can correct me.
@Johnny Depp’s Girl I had a similiar situation in my family. A Female family member was bitter over her divorce for 15 years until her ex died a few years ago. Now she has taken out all the photos and has lauded him as a saint. The children are so angry because she was so bitter and let her anger effect their relationship with their father when they were young.
I think anyone who has known someone like that recognizes some of Aniston’s passive aggressive patterns.
@Cheyenne:By continuing to appear on Handler’s show after she let loose with that disgusting monologue, Aniston is giving tacit approval to what Handler said. She is making it look like she is using Handler as her pit bull to say up front what she only whines about in private.
You don’t know that for a fact. You’re assuming Cheyenne. And again what about all the others who appear on CH’s show? Why aren’t they just as responsible?
@mln: yeah I agree things do get crazy on here. I know you aren’t *one of them* and neither am I. At least I hope I dont come across that way. Anyway it was fun “debating” with you. Have a great day! And Cheyenne, regardless of your answer you have a great day too! I’m outta here!
The thing is people believe birds of a feather, flock together. Jennifer is friends and dates douchey people like Chelsea, Joe Francis, John Mayer, etc so it isn’t ridiculous to believe that Jennifer loves it when Chelsea bashes Angelina and her kids.
I also wonder if the SNL thing is true. She’s talked about early jobs, etc and this has never come up. I’m thinking she was invited to audition but Jennifer is saying she was offered a job.
ITA with: Crash2GO2, Jennifer is a hypocrite and mln76 (especially your comment @26).
Great comments guys, well said. 😀
Oi. There is nothing wrong with dressing up out four legged babies. In winter my King Charles (who passed of old age last week – HEARTBREAKING!!) loved a t-shirt or jumper in winter. She knew she was a ‘showgirl’ when she was dressed up and she would prance around proudly.
Now on Chelsea Handler. I love her. I can’t help it. The worst thing is Im an Angie fan too. Call me crazy but I even like Jen. I have said it before, all 3 chicks would be fun friends to have. I dont get all the hate or why people who dont even know them not have ever met them pick sides. Maybe Im the strange one?
i dont get it. So CH made some comments about a friends ex. Big deal. You mean to tell me none of us has ever sat around with our friends and bashed an ex and/or their newest partner. Please. I must be living under a rock, cuz I never knew the world was so perfect. *eye roll*
Stacy: Some of these folks use whatever excuse they have to dislike Aniston-even 5 year old comments about wanting children, calling her a hypocrite about wanting kids just because she hasn’t had any yet, and squeezing out some bs about holding her accountable for what her friend said about her EX’s kids (her EX whom she’s been over 5 years divorced from-aren’t we supposed to let this go?)-even though they apparently don’t hold E! Entertainment television (which has extended her show through 2012), her manager, her publicist, nor any other guest she’s had on the show, accountable.
Don’t forget folks, Minka Kelly, James Blunt, Kathy Griffin, Tom Bergeron, Keyshia Cole, Bill Bellamy, Kate Bosworth, Rachel Bilson, Sophia Bush, Nicki Minaj, Gwyneth Paltrow, Taylor Swift and countless comedians and other guests also give tacit approval to comments about Angelina Jolie’s children by Chelsea Handler because they agreed to appear on her show after she made the comments.
I’ve said it once and I’ll say it again, I’d hate to be held accountable for some of the dumb nonsense my friends say and do.
Bebe:
February 7th, 2011 at 12:24 pm You Angelina fans are too sensative!
_______________________________________
Yeah, because being offended that someone calls a woman the c word and attacks who black children is not common human response, to Aniston fans (rolls eyes).
Someone, I don’t understand WHY people CAN’T see why others hate Aniston. I guess her and Handler’s behaviour is acceptible to immoral people. How can people NOT see why?
Her associating with Handler, STILL, proves and says everything about Aniston. She is a vile piece of trash. How can people NOT SEE THIS??
Stacy, clearly you DON’T get it. And thats very sad. Rolls eyes.
There are actually bitchy girls who think that as long as they are justified, it is OK to talk shit about people they do not like. Here is the problem: Aniston is a celebrity. Positive deeds make her look good and enhances her image. Also, any negative comment or association has an ugly impact. Furthermore, having your girlfriend “out” your exhusband’s wife and children on your shows and on more than one occasion is in poor taste.
Cheyenne,! there is nothing to do about persons who attack people in public. When you use your position of influence in a abusive way…well, you’ll have a Chelsea Handler. Aniston simply is not the sharpest knife in the drawer. I say let “Maniston” continue on with her rant…soon enough that is all she will have left to keep her relevant.
Lol at people like Skibunny. Its really, REALLY simple. Its been said often enough on other Aniston threads on here. Do people bother reading?
1. Chelsea used to knock Jolie AND Aniston.
2. Chelsea starts being repped by Huvane, Aniston’s management.
3. All of a sudden, Chelsea stops running down Aniston but RAMPS UP her attacks on Jolie.
4. All of a sudden, Aniston and Handler are BEST FRIENDS, even taking FAMILY (what is supposed to be for family) ‘business’ vacations like Thanksgiving together.
5. Immediately thereafter on their return, Handler ramps up the attacks even more on Angelina, calls her the c word, a wh.ore, and attacks her children……
6. WHILST *introducing Aniston as her next guest*. Of which Aniston grins and doesn’t miss a cue.
7. Aniston clearly has no problem with the introduction (of being tied to Jolie and Handler attacking Jolie AND HER CHILDREN) as Handler CONTINUES to introduce Aniston in this manner for several appearances after the first one. If it was a problem for Jen, Handler would have stopped LONG ago.
Are you people this thick, that you can’t see this is no mere “coincidence”? Aniston and Huvane were in on this with Handler from THE VERY BEGINNNING. She is using Handler as a pitbull attack dog, so she keeps her ‘image’ (that people on here swallow hook, line and sinker) clean. Unfortunately for her, on other boards I’ve noticved even the Aniston fans have joined the dots, even if the dopey slow ones on here haven’t.
Aniston is an instigator, a schemer, and a manipulator. And shes fooling you all. Handler is Huvaniston’s puppet, and they are pulling the strings. WAKE UP!
I believe that JA was offered a part on snl. Adam Sadler brought the story up himself and said when he heard she was offered the part he was excited bc he had wanted to work with her.
As far as her choice in friends- friends are not perfect. Handler said some crude things but those jokes probably don’t define their friendship. I don’t know ainston’s thoughts on the jokes nor is it my buisness. If shes okay with it- fine. Its easy to be judgemental standing on the outside looking in.
In any event Handler was no more crude than Ricky G. at the golden globes. Its what they do to get paid and we are watching, so whose at fault?
Umm, Salem? Do you know what “immoral” means? Perhaps you’re criticizing the wrong person in this supposed “love triangle”.
Seriously, people. So what if they’re friends. Just imagine that your worst conspiracy theory is *gasp* true: Aniston is really great pals with Chelsea Handler and the two of them sit around and make fun of Brad and Angie and their circus performer children. WHO THE HELL EVEN CARES? It’s sure not hurting their careers. Perhaps you should be getting angry that America tends to enjoy jokes that make fun of Angelina? Food for thought.
Brangelina fans will never let go of Jennifer Aniston. They say she can’t move on, when in fact, it is the fans of the Brange who continuasly connect her to everything Brange. Jennifer was married to Pitt a long time ago, since then she has dated other men, made tons of movies,she has gone on with her life, and yet, for some reason, the Brange fans can’t stop bringing her up all the time, researching her news,; commenting on her threads, linking her forever to Pitt and Jolie. If, as they say, Jennifer has nothing to do with Pitt anymore, then why in the world would she distance herself from Chelsea because she used the Brange in her monologue. They are nothing to her, they are not connected in anyway, so why would she 1) come to their defense, 2) scold Chelsea ??
Jennifer and the Pitts are in no way related, friends, or anything. The fans can’t have it both ways. On one hand they want Jennifer to “move on” and on the other hand they are the ones always bringing up her ex and her marriage in regards to everything she says or does…
Going from CC to this !!!
People who think that your entourage or your affiliation doesn’t taint you are delusional. Jen is not an exception to that rule of thumb applied universally to anyone.
Some people even officially change their name because of someone close to them being a criminal or caught in some scandal, so that they are not lump in the same category.
Those are the same people who were criticizing Gabe Aubry for dating/being friend with Kardashian but find it harmful to jen image and rep to be even more associated to Chelsea.
I am sorry but Kardashian is nor more obscene, nor harmful to anyone repu than Handler and much less than Joe Francis.
You are defined by your entourage too wether you like it or not. If you have no problems to back up peadophiles who like underage girls like Joe Francis, cheap comedians who publicly lynch specific children so that other adult can heve their daily gloating at their expense, urinators who publicly say that they only date and piss on stupid women as foreplay, fine, but don’t expect people to think of you as a someone recommendable with such an entourage.
You certainly not in the higher classer sphere there, more like the trailer trash company with obscene boozers, scato people like Mayer and peadophiles like Joe Francis. It only needed Lohan and Mel Gibbson to join the selective club and voilà you get the perfect team of trailer trash people and there is no way that you have numerous people of that questionble quality in your close entourage without sharing some of the same specificity !
Birds of a feathers flock together.
_Salem_ are you for real? You are obviously a little bit obsessed… Rolls eyes too, while saying a little prayer for _Salem_ to find a more relevant passion in life.
I agree with the comments of Cheyenne, Salem, nnn, etc.
I have had friends who have done questionable acts. As they continued to do them, rant and NOT change, we would separate because some their of mean-spirited ways presented a conflict with what I believe in.
I could not be friends with Chelsea Handler. I would spend too much of my time trying to change her, which would be wrong of me to do.
Aniston did not/does not have a relationship with Angie, she never knew her. It is because of Brad–that is what makes Angie relevant to Aniston. Again, when Aniston can pass on the need to talk shit about Angie and her kids to her “Goddess Circle of Friends,” who by the way ALL have man problems (most are now divorced or cheaters themselves)—that is the day that Aniston will truly be over Brad. Until then, Aniston, you can start your collection of buying cats now.
Next!
Surprisingly, Aniston was great in that interview. Charming and funny. And it looks like they’re really friends. I don’t like the making fun of Angelina part, but it actually made me like her more.
Oh, and I totally put sweaters on my 80lb. pitbull. He gets cold and I think it’s cute.
Oh.My.God. How judgey are you guys?! So at the age of 41 someone likes to have a drink. And a girlfriend. And a bitch every now and again. And you all don’t I suppose? Whatever.
lol @salem. really? you must be living under a rock to think that women dont have a man bash fest every now and then. get over yourself.
Stacy, who said women don’t bash men every now and then. *I* NEVER said that. What bs excuse is that of yours, to justify your continued willful ignorance of the TRUTH of Aniston? Wake up, smell the coffee, and get over it and yourself.